The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Wednesday, January 6, 2010

So How Good Might the 2010 Red Sox Defense Be?

As Yankee fans, we generally keep an eye on our divisional rivals in the North East. In 2009, the Red Sox fell short of a strong Yankee team before bowing out to the Los Angeles Angels of California in the ALDS. While the Red Sox had a good overall season winning 95 games and taking the wild card, one area where they were pretty poor was on defense.

Here's how the Red Sox rated at each position defensively in 2009 using standard zone rating and UZR.

TM POS zRS uRS aRS
Bos 1B 3 5 4
Bos 2B 7 9 8
Bos 3B -7 -12 -9
Bos CF -11 -20 -15
Bos LF -21 -12 -17
Bos RF -1 9 4
Bos SS -7 8 0
Bos Total -36 -14 -25


zRS: Defensive runs saved above average using zone rating
uRS: Defensive runs saved above average using UZR
aRS: Average of zRS and uRS

The primary big disparity between ZR and UZR is the Green Monster. Standard zone rating counts chances off the wall as playable for some bizarre reason, whereas UZR does not. Shortstop also seems diametrically opposite. When UZR is better than zone rating, it usually means the position saw a higher than normal distribution of difficult chances. Zone rating treats all chances the same, whereas UZR adjusts for batted ball velocity, handedness of the batter/pitcher and GB/FB tendencies which should help adjust for the difficulty of chances.

Because of the issues with LF and SS, the Red Sox were probably closer to a -14 team than a -36 team. Either way, they weren't very good.

Jason Bay has generally not been a good defender, and as a Met he's no longer their problem. Even though Jacoby Ellsbury is really fast and looks like a good defender, the metrics were less than impressed. Mike Lowell's hip issue severely impacted his lateral range, and it looks like he's not long for Boston at this point.

In signing Mike Cameron, Adrian Beltre and Marco Scutaro as the replacements for Bay, Lowell and Nick Green, the Red Sox signed three players who are good defenders. Adding them to Kevin Youkilis, Dustin Pedroia and J.D. Drew who are all good defenders appears to turn a Red Sox weakness into a strength.

So how much of a strength is it? Here's how CAIRO has what looks like their primary roster projected offensively and defensively.

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jacoby Ellsbury lf 640 .291/.348/.403 85 418 18 2 2.1
Dustin Pedroia 2b 650 .304/.373/.458 96 408 34 8 4.2
Victor Martinez C 575 .299/.376/.474 85 359 35 0 3.5
Kevin Youkilis 1b 615 .290/.392/.499 99 374 29 4 3.3
David Ortiz dh 600 .264/.371/.507 94 377 21 0 2.1
J.D. Drew rf 525 .269/.383/.472 79 324 23 2 2.5
Mike Cameron cf 600 .244/.332/.431 77 401 19 5 2.4
Adrian Beltre 3b 575 .264/.315/.439 66 397 8 8 1.6
Marco Scutaro ss 560 .273/.354/.388 67 362 18 3 2.0
Starters Total 5340 .277/.360/.449 748 3418 204 33 23.8
Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jeremy Hermida lf 355 .259/.340/.427 45 234 8 -3 0.5
Bill Hall 3b 234 .218/.287/.390 23 167 0 2 0.2
Jason Varitek c 215 .221/.325/.368 23 145 4 0 0.4
Jed Lowrie ss 120 .251/.332/.414 15 80 4 0 0.4
Tug Hulett 2b 80 .235/.308/.359 8 55 0 0 0.0
Bench Total 1004 .238/.321/.399 114 682 16 -1 1.5
Player PA BR AVG/OBP/SLG Outs BRAR RS WAR
Team Total 6344 861 .271/.354/.441 4100 220 32 25.5


BR: Absolute linear weights batting runs based on estimated playing time, not adjusted for position.
Outs: Outs made while batting. Team outs should add up to around 4100 over a full season.
BRAR: Batting runs above replacement level at position.
RS: Runs saved compared to average, using an average of zone rating and UZR pro-rated to projected playing time.
WAR: Wins above replacement (BRAR + RS).

Moving Ellsbury to LF from CF makes him a plus defender according to my projections, so it looks like the Red Sox can run out a defense that is at least average at every position (I'm not including catchers for now, so Victor Martinez may change that). If these numbers are to be believed, the red Sox have probably made themselves 40 to 50 runs better defensively with the moves they've made this offseason.

Standard caveats about defensive metrics having more uncertainty than offensive or pitching metrics apply here, so don't take this as definitive proof or anything.

I haven't really finalized their pitching depth chart so I'm not going to post it yet, but with the one I have worked up they look like a .598 Pythagenpat team right now, which is .025 points worse than the Yankees were when I ran their numbers. That's the difference between a 97 win team and 101 win team in a neutral league, though we probably want to knock off a couple of wins frome each team to account for being in the AL East.

So right now, I still think the Yankees are better by a few games, but in a 162 game season that's not much of a difference, and of course a lot can change between now and the end of the 2010 season.
--Posted at 8:21 pm by SG / 71 Comments | - (117)



Page 1 of 1 pages: