The Curse of... oh, let's say, Clay Bellinger:








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


The Curious Case of Robinson Cano’s Defense in 2008
(64 Comments - 9/6/2008 12:22:32 pm)

NY Post: ‘FRAUD’ IS ‘JOBA’ THE NUT
(31 Comments - 9/5/2008 4:56:42 pm)

MLB Team Defense by Zone Rating through September 4, 2008
(99 Comments - 9/5/2008 2:51:47 pm)

Yankees (75-64) @ Rays (84-53), 7:10pm **Game Chatter**
(89 Comments - 9/5/2008 9:40:32 am)

Yankees (74-64) @ Rays (84-52), 7:10pm **Game Chatter**
(170 Comments - 9/4/2008 8:39:38 am)

tRA and the 2008 Yankees
(83 Comments - 9/4/2008 12:40:22 am)

Yankees (73-64) @ Rays (84-51), 7:10pm **Game Chatter**
(133 Comments - 9/3/2008 11:17:45 am)

Newsday - O’Brien: Chamberlain back today, will work out of bullpen
(33 Comments - 9/2/2008 5:26:24 pm)

NY Daily News: Yankees’ Minor League Report
(18 Comments - 9/2/2008 4:47:20 pm)

Yankees.com: Joba to face hitters in next rehab phase
(189 Comments - 9/1/2008 10:25:06 pm)



Player

Current Projected
Brian Bruney
11 G
15 G
12 IP
16 IP
Dan Giese
11 G
15 G
21.7 IP
29 IP
Damaso Marte
5 G
7 G
4.7 IP
6 IP
Edwar Ramirez
37 G
49 G
40.7 IP
54 IP
Mariano Rivera
44 G
58 G
48.3 IP
64 IP
David Robertson
14 G
19 G
16.3 IP
22 IP
Jose Veras
38 G
50 G
38.7 IP
51 IP
Total
274 G
364 G
328.3 IP
435 IP

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Monday, February 25, 2008

Looking Ahead to 2008 - Alex Rodriguez

Alex Rodriguez opted out of his contract with the Yankees during the World Series. For a few weeks it looked like his time with the Yankees was over and the team would have a huge hole to fill at third base.

What happened after that is open to several interpretations. The market seemingly did not bear what Rodriguez's agent Scott Boras had promised him, so he initiated contact with the Yankees who had made bold proclamations that if Rodriguez had opted out, they would not re-sign him. From there the Yankees and Rodriguez negotiated, allegedly without Boras and Rodriguez was brought back on a ten year contract.

It is my opinion that Rodriguez put the blame on Boras to help him get some of the egg off his face after what was a PR disaster. Boras works for Rodriguez, it's not the other way around.

Frankly, none of that really matters in the big picture. Business is business, and I have no problems with Rodriguez using the opt-out clause that was negotiated into his contract, although I will admit I was pretty pissed when he first opted out.

The Yankees are a much better team with Rodriguez than without him. If Rodriguez performs well, all this contract stuff should end up being a non-issue although it's doubtful the media will let it go away if at all possible. We've reset the A-Rod cover counter for 2008, but for 2007 Rodriguez made the front or back page of the NY Post and NY Daily News 137 separate times. Let's see if he can top that in 2008.

2007
By just about any objective measure, Rodriguez was the best player in baseball last season. How good was Rodriguez? His lowest OPS at any point in the season was .976, which was his OPS after three games. That was the only day that his OPS was under 1, and the last day of the season that his OPS was under 1.022.

Here's how Rodriguez performed compared to his projections going into 2007.

2007 PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BR/650
Avg Projection 650 557 107 162 26 1 34 110 15 4 81 127 10 .292 .390 .529 108
Actual 708 583 143 183 31 0 54 156 24 4 95 120 21 .314 .422 .645 136
% Diff 9% 5% 22% 3% 8% -100% 45% 31% 46% -3% 7% -14% 102% 8% 8% 22% 26%


The percentage differences for everything except PA and AB are on a rate basis. Rodriguez was disgraceful, hitting no triples despite being projected to hit one in what was clearly a disappointing season.

I kid of course. Rodriguez blew away his projections. He hit 22 pts higher than projected on batting average, hit 45% more HRs on a rate basis, walked 7% more frequently and struck out 14% less frequently (this was key IMO). He stole more bases than expected, and he provided 26% more offense according to linear weights on a rate basis. Rodriguez illustrates one of the major limitations with projection systems, they just aren't designed to handle the outliers.

Rodriguez was also able to get the "unclutch" monkey off his back, by hitting several key game-winning HRs in the ninth inning.
April 7 vs. Chris Ray
April 19 vs. Joe Borowski
June 3 vs. Jon Papelbon

Rodriguez hit .318/.448/.776 with runners in scoring position and two outs. He hit .357/.439/.686 in Late & Close situations (PA in the 7th or later with the batting team tied, ahead by one, or the tying run at least on deck.). His worst split? When the margin of the game was greater than four runs (.218/.375/.540).

Unfortunately, Rodriguez had another disappointing post-season as the Yankees were eliminated in four games by Cleveland in the ALDS. He didn't hit particularly poorly overall thanks to a two hit game in Game 4 including a HR, but he got some grief regardless. Anyone that says that losing the ALDS was Rodriguez's fault is being foolish, but he didn't help as much as he could have.

Offense
2007 is over and done, so what can we look for in 2008? Thanks to last season, all the projection systems expect better from Rodriguez at age 32 than they did in heading into his age 31 season.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 653 551 124 167 25 1 47 123 16 4 88 122 14 .303 .412 .608 51 67
marcel 621 525 108 157 26 1 36 116 17 4 79 118 12 .299 .399 .558 39 54
pecota 684 572 120 169 34 2 36 116 23 4 94 130 11 .294 .401 .550 43 59
zips 698 590 127 180 30 1 44 151 16 3 93 132 15 .305 .413 .583 51 68
cairo 689 581 123 174 27 1 43 129 19 4 90 128 14 .299 .403 .570 46 63
average 669 564 121 169 28 1 41 127 18 4 89 126 13 .300 .406 .574 46 62


For more information on the projections being used here, you can look at the first entry in this series.

Rodriguez projects to be somewhere between 5 to 7 wins better than a replacement level 3B in 2008, on average around 6 wins better. CAIRO lines up fairly well with the other projections, sort of in the middle. Here's how CAIRO sees Rodriguez's range of projections.

CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 689 581 135 187 33 2 49 140 24 2 99 117 18 .322 .442 .639 68 85
65% 689 581 129 181 30 1 46 134 21 3 95 122 16 .311 .422 .604 57 74
Baseline 689 581 123 174 27 1 43 129 19 4 90 128 14 .299 .403 .570 46 63
35% 689 581 118 167 25 0 39 123 17 5 85 134 12 .288 .384 .536 35 51
20% 689 581 112 161 22 0 36 117 15 6 80 139 10 .277 .365 .501 24 40


Rodriguez is so good that even the 80% projection doesn't seem that unrealistic. His 20% projection would be considered disappointing but it would STILL be 4 wins better than a replacement level 3B. This is a great player, and he's going to be a Yankee for the next ten years, so for the vocal minority that still dislikes him, WTF is wrong with you? To quote the great Ric Flair:
Whether you like it, or you don't like it, learn to love it, because it's the best thing going today.


The sooner the Yankee fans who dislike Rodriguez embrace him, the sooner they'll get to enjoy the play of the best player on the team.

Defense
Lost in the monstrous season by Rodriguez offensively was the fact that he played much better defense as well. He ended the season a smidgen above average by zone rating, but he was actually pretty solidly above average most of the season. On July 23 Rodriguez's zone rating was .821 compared to the AL average of .765 and he had made around 14 plays more than an average AL 3B, which was roughly equivalent to saving 11 runs above average to that point and 19 runs over 162 games. Over the remaining 57 games Rodriguez's zone rating was only .669 and he made somewhere around 11 plays fewer than average. To my eyes he didn't seem to play any worse in the second half although he made 7 errors over 130 chances as opposed to 6 errors over his first 240 chances, so he may have just faced harder opportunities. Still, overall it was a nice rebound after a couple of pretty bad defensive seasons.

Year Pos GP Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RSAA/162
2004 3B 155 1364 100 262 13 25 286 364 .786 14 11 12
2005 3B 161 1385 115 288 12 26 321 436 .736 -15 -12 -13
2006 3B 151 1288 96 262 24 24 289 390 .741 -10 -8 -9
2007 3B 154 1330 106 251 13 30 283 370 .765 2 1 1
Projection 155 1334 104 262 16 27 292 387 .755 -4 -3 -4


Between his below average play in 2005 and 2006 and the fact that he's going to be another year older, I project Rodriguez to be about 3-4 runs below average in 2008. I think his bat can carry that though...

Baserunning
Not only can Rodriguez hit well and field passably, he's an outstanding baserunner too. By Lee Panas's bases gained above average, Rodriguez gained 11.8 bases above average on hits, 2.7 on grounders, 2.5 on fly outs, and another 11.1 on other situations. Good for 28.1 total BGAA, which ranked sixth in the AL. I'd regress that some for 2008 and say a conservative projection would be something like +15.

Value
Well, Rodriguez has the biggest contract in baseball history. Is he worth it?

Value Runs Wins
Offense 62 6.2
Defense -3 -0.3
Baserunning 4 0.4
Overall Value 63 6.3
2008 Value (in millions) 27.2
2008 Salary (in millions) 27.0
Difference 0.2


At least for 2008, Rodriguez's compensation is in line with his projection of being 6.3 wins above replacement level overall. His contract is going to start looking worse as he gets older and further away from his peak, although inflation will help to mitigate that at least partially. I also tend to think that a linear look at value penalizes a star player like Rodriguez. What I mean by that is in theory a pair of three win players are as valuable as one six win player on paper, but the fact that Rodriguez only takes up one roster spot to get you those six wins has some inherent value as well, especially for a large revenue team.

Conclusion
As a fan, I really looked forward to Rodriguez's at-bats last season. It's hard to put it in words, but there was something cool about the anticipation watching the people in front of Rodriguez doing whatever they could to get on base to set up the big guy in the cleanup spot to do his magic, and he did it all year. This is a Hall of Famer who may have just had the best season of his career at age 31 and he should continue to be the best player on the team for the next few years. More than any player on the team, Rodriguez will be the difference between the Yankees making or missing the playoffs. Let's hope he can stay healthy, and let's hope the rest of the team can contribute to get them to the playoffs. From there, maybe Rodriguez will have the postseason that he probably needs to have to FINALLY get accepted as a Yankee.

Plug Time
Francis Gasparini, bka fgasparini in the comments section here pointed me to his podcast called Widely Ranging Interests, which can be accessed at widelyranginginterests.com. It's not about baseball, but there is more to life than baseball, isn't there?
--Posted at 8:46 am by SG / 33 Comments | - (878)



Page 1 of 1 pages: