The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Wednesday, March 8, 2006

Looking Ahead to 2006 - Chien-Ming Wang

From the depths of allegedly the worst farm system in the history of organized baseball, emerged a Taiwanese flame-thrower who did not strike anyone out.  Somehow, despite this inability to whiff batters, and playing in front of a defensively challenged infield, Chien-Ming Wang managed to pitch 116 innings to an ERA of just 4.02, and helped the Yankees rebound from an 11-19 start to win the AL East.
Wang was called up on April 30, and beat the Blue Jays 4-2.  From there through July 8, Wang went with a 3.89 ERA.  Then came the news that Wang had a rotator cuff tear and would miss the season.A check with James Andrews downgraded the severity of Wang’s injury, and he was able to return in September to make five more starts.

Wang had major shoulder surgery in 2000 that caused him to miss 2001. Here’s a pre-season scouting report on Wang

Wang’s low strikeout rate is the chief reason to be concerned about his performance in 2006.  The injury history and the fact that last year was a career-high in innings is another.  However, a look at Wang’s BB rate and K rate over the course of 2005 gives some cause for optimism.



Wang’s BB rate decreased slightly and his K rate increased slightly as the season progressed.  Unfortunately, the HR rate creeped up a bit as well. 

Wang was an extreme groundball pitcher last year, which kept his HR rate low enough to pitch to a 4.22 FIP, despite his obscenely low strikeout rate. 

How extreme of a groundballer can be seen in the pie chart below (thanks to Gotham Dark Knight for upgrading us so we are no longer one of the worst Yankee blogs):



HR rate tends to correlate more closely to fly ball rate than to itself every year, which is reflected in the statistic xFIP (expected fielding independent pitching), which normalizes a pitcher’s HR rate to 10% of his fly ball rate.  Wang’s xFIP was 4.39, which is still a very good number for a young starting pitcher, and would make him an average starter.

The graph below shows Wang’s ERA and FIP over the course of 2005.  As you can see, they line up very closely post-surgery.  As much as people want to point to Wang’s K rates as “proof” that he was a complete fluke, there is a mountain of other evidence that shows that they are wrong.  He pitched about as well as his final numbers say he did.



While I am concerned about his ability to miss bats, I’m less concerned from watching him pitch.  This is a guy who throws in the low to mid 90s with sick downward movement.  For comparison, here are Wang’s peripherals from the minors vs. the majors:


Minors Majors
HR/9: .41 .7
BB/9: 2.07 2.48
K/9: 7.16 3.64



I think he will bump his K rate up a bit, enough to off-set any regression in either his control or his HR rate.

The other concern, which I think is far more valid, is Wang’s durability.  Prior to last season, Wang’s high for innings in a season was 149.1.  Last year he pitched 150.1. 

I think the Yankees need to be careful with him this year, and try to skip him a few times if possible.  I wouldn’t want to see him pitch more than 170-180 innings this year.

So how about the projection systems and what they see for Wang in 2006?



In 2005, Wang was responsible for 43 pitching runs created over 116 innings, which was actually about 3 runs below average due to his low K rate.  Still, average to slightly below average pitching is still a valuable thing, particularly for a strong offensive team.

The projection systems call for something in the neighborhood of 140 innings for Wang.  I have no idea if he will get hurt or not, but if he is healthy all season, this is a low estimate.  I’ll assume that he gets up to 180 innings or so this year, and taking the average of the 3 projections would make Wang worth about 69 PRC. 

As far as a comparison to last year, I’ll say Wang is taking his 116 innings and then another 64 from the dearly departed Kevin Brown.  Wang 2005 64 innings of Brown 2005 were worth 60 PRC, so 2006 Wang should be about 9 more PRC, or close to one win.

So now we have 570 innings taken up by RJ, Moose, and Wang, at a total value of 264 PRC.  Compared to 570 innings from RJ, Moose, and Wang Brown last year, which were worth 254 PRC.  There’s another win upgrade, relative to last year.

Spring Training Update
The Yankees shut the Twins out

5-0 yesterday. 

Hideki Matsui is killing the ball right now, and Jorge Posada went yard off Brad Radke.  Kevin Thompson showed that he still has some learning

to do in the OF, horribly reading a fly ball from Torii Hunter that became a triple, but following it up with very nice catch later in the game.

Shawn Chacon pitched three solid innings, although his velocity is still not where I’d like to see it.  The man just seems to know how to pitch.

Mariano Rivera made his spring debut and threw 6 pitches in a 1-2-3 inning. 

I wouldn’t pay too much mind to the Giambi and Sheffield situation yet.  Older guys who

are just reporting to camp are a bit sore?  Hardly a shock, and hardly worth worrying about, yet.

--Posted at 7:38 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (100)



Page 1 of 1 pages: