The Curse of... oh, let's say, Clay Bellinger:








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Yankees.com: Yankees have tough decisions to make
(134 Comments - 10/6/2008 8:19:41 am)

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Relief Pitching Edition)
(128 Comments - 10/3/2008 5:50:16 pm)

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Starting Pitching Edition)
(112 Comments - 10/3/2008 1:20:34 am)

Newsday: O’Brien: Yankees’ Cashman to sign three-year deal
(50 Comments - 10/1/2008 3:29:32 pm)

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Offense Edition)
(73 Comments - 10/1/2008 8:01:57 am)

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Defense Edition)
(50 Comments - 9/30/2008 7:39:48 pm)

Yay Moose!
(79 Comments - 9/29/2008 6:30:14 pm)

Yankees (88-72) @ RedSox (94-66), **Double Header Game Chatter**
(194 Comments - 9/28/2008 10:22:39 pm)

NorthJersey.com - Caldera: Yankees keep Sox from clinching AL East
(30 Comments - 9/28/2008 11:37:16 am)

Baseball America: Brackman Kicks Off HWB
(34 Comments - 9/27/2008 4:49:45 pm)



Player

Current Projected
Brian Bruney
11 G
15 G
12 IP
16 IP
Dan Giese
11 G
15 G
21.7 IP
29 IP
Damaso Marte
5 G
7 G
4.7 IP
6 IP
Edwar Ramirez
37 G
49 G
40.7 IP
54 IP
Mariano Rivera
44 G
58 G
48.3 IP
64 IP
David Robertson
14 G
19 G
16.3 IP
22 IP
Jose Veras
38 G
50 G
38.7 IP
51 IP
Total
274 G
364 G
328.3 IP
435 IP

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Monday, June 16, 2008

Fractured Wang

Well, the news is in on Chien-Ming Wang's injury, and it's not good for Yankee fans. I will resist the temptation to bash the insipid inter-league play that led to this injury. Instead, let's look at the impact of this injury.

The Yankees have 92 games left this year. Divide by five and you get 18 starts for each slot in the rotation. For all intents and purposes, I'm going to assume that Wang is done for the year. First, let's look at what a healthy Wang would be expected to do over his remaining starts, using his 2008 projection weighed at 70% and his 2008 actual performance weighed at 30%. For the numbers that follow, I am assuming a replacement level pitcher would put up an ERA of 5.58.

Healthy Wang ERA G IP/G IP ER RAR WAR
Wang 3.90 18 6.70 121 52 23 2.3


Wang's revised projection was for a 3.90 ERA. He's averaging 6.7 innings per game this year, so I assumed that is what he would have done over the rest of the season. So in 18 starts, Wang would give the team 121 innings and save 23 runs above a replacement level pitcher (RAR). Divide that by 10 to get the wins above replacement (2.3 WAR).

So those 18 starts and 121 innings have to go somewhere. Let's assume they're split over Dan Giese, IPK, and Phil Hughes.

G/K/H/R ERA G IP/G IP ER RAR WAR
Giese 4.21 8 5.00 40 19 6 0.6
Kennedy 5.35 7 5.00 35 21 1 0.1
Hughes 5.42 3 5.00 15 9 0 0.0
Repl Level P 5.58 31 1.00 31 19 0 0.0
Total 5.04 -------- 121 68 7 0.7


Giese's MLE and projection are probably overly optimistic, but this is supposed to be objective. I'm assuming here that none of this trio will be able to average more than 5 innings a start. Kennedy and Hughes both projected better coming into 2008 but at this point I'm going to assume they will be about a hair better than replacement level. So there's a shortfall of 31 innings that I am going to estimate will be picked up by a replacement level reliever, although it's possible one of the kids on the farm could improve on that. So in this case, the Yankees lose about 1.6 wins by going from Wang to this group of pitchers.

If Giese is replacement level, then the Yankees are basically down the 2.3 wins that Wang would have given them.

Lastly, since we'll be hearing and reading about it for the next few weeks, here's what C.C. Sabathia would be projected to do.

Scenario 1 ERA G IP/G IP ER RAR WAR
Sabathia 3.70 18 6.90 124 51 26 2.6


Sabathia's a little more durable than Wang on a per game basis, so he'd be a slight upgrade if he was acquired.

So yeah, this sucks, but it's probably not as dire as it may seem right now.
--Posted at 2:39 pm by SG / 186 Comments | - (90)



Page 1 of 1 pages: