The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Saturday, January 16, 2010

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16

Obviously it's way too early to make much of these, but here's how I have the AL East projected with CAIRO given current rosters and my estimated playing times.
Team W L RS RA Div% WC% PL%
Yankees 100.3 61.7 864 664 66.4% 24.5% 90.9%
Red Sox 94.9 67.1 861 700 26.1% 44.8% 70.9%
Rays 89.3 72.7 804 706 7.4% 21.9% 29.3%
Blue Jays 70.1 91.9 696 761 - 0.2% 0.2%
Orioles 70.4 91.6 778 854 0.1% 0.2% 0.3%


W: Average projected win total
L: Average projected loss total
RS: Projected runs scored
RA: Projected runs allowed
Div%: Percentage of times team won division
WC%: Percentage of times team won wild card
PL%: Percentage of times team made the playoffs (Div% + WC%)

Although it looks like Boston's offense is on par with the Yankees superficially, it's not once you consider the park factors. The Yankees are probably about forty runs better than Boston offensively in a neutral park right now, although the converse applies to the pitching staffs.

Interestingly enough, for all the talk about Boston's great defense, they're not even the best defense in the division, with Tampa Bay projecting close to 20 runs better than Boston.

Anyway, expect lots to change before we can really have useful projected standings, so please don't take these too seriously.

--Posted at 11:22 am by SG / 35 Comments | - (122)




Wednesday, January 6, 2010

So How Good Might the 2010 Red Sox Defense Be?

As Yankee fans, we generally keep an eye on our divisional rivals in the North East. In 2009, the Red Sox fell short of a strong Yankee team before bowing out to the Los Angeles Angels of California in the ALDS. While the Red Sox had a good overall season winning 95 games and taking the wild card, one area where they were pretty poor was on defense.

Here's how the Red Sox rated at each position defensively in 2009 using standard zone rating and UZR.

TM POS zRS uRS aRS
Bos 1B 3 5 4
Bos 2B 7 9 8
Bos 3B -7 -12 -9
Bos CF -11 -20 -15
Bos LF -21 -12 -17
Bos RF -1 9 4
Bos SS -7 8 0
Bos Total -36 -14 -25


zRS: Defensive runs saved above average using zone rating
uRS: Defensive runs saved above average using UZR
aRS: Average of zRS and uRS

The primary big disparity between ZR and UZR is the Green Monster. Standard zone rating counts chances off the wall as playable for some bizarre reason, whereas UZR does not. Shortstop also seems diametrically opposite. When UZR is better than zone rating, it usually means the position saw a higher than normal distribution of difficult chances. Zone rating treats all chances the same, whereas UZR adjusts for batted ball velocity, handedness of the batter/pitcher and GB/FB tendencies which should help adjust for the difficulty of chances.

Because of the issues with LF and SS, the Red Sox were probably closer to a -14 team than a -36 team. Either way, they weren't very good.

Jason Bay has generally not been a good defender, and as a Met he's no longer their problem. Even though Jacoby Ellsbury is really fast and looks like a good defender, the metrics were less than impressed. Mike Lowell's hip issue severely impacted his lateral range, and it looks like he's not long for Boston at this point.

In signing Mike Cameron, Adrian Beltre and Marco Scutaro as the replacements for Bay, Lowell and Nick Green, the Red Sox signed three players who are good defenders. Adding them to Kevin Youkilis, Dustin Pedroia and J.D. Drew who are all good defenders appears to turn a Red Sox weakness into a strength.

So how much of a strength is it? Here's how CAIRO has what looks like their primary roster projected offensively and defensively.

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jacoby Ellsbury lf 640 .291/.348/.403 85 418 18 2 2.1
Dustin Pedroia 2b 650 .304/.373/.458 96 408 34 8 4.2
Victor Martinez C 575 .299/.376/.474 85 359 35 0 3.5
Kevin Youkilis 1b 615 .290/.392/.499 99 374 29 4 3.3
David Ortiz dh 600 .264/.371/.507 94 377 21 0 2.1
J.D. Drew rf 525 .269/.383/.472 79 324 23 2 2.5
Mike Cameron cf 600 .244/.332/.431 77 401 19 5 2.4
Adrian Beltre 3b 575 .264/.315/.439 66 397 8 8 1.6
Marco Scutaro ss 560 .273/.354/.388 67 362 18 3 2.0
Starters Total 5340 .277/.360/.449 748 3418 204 33 23.8
Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jeremy Hermida lf 355 .259/.340/.427 45 234 8 -3 0.5
Bill Hall 3b 234 .218/.287/.390 23 167 0 2 0.2
Jason Varitek c 215 .221/.325/.368 23 145 4 0 0.4
Jed Lowrie ss 120 .251/.332/.414 15 80 4 0 0.4
Tug Hulett 2b 80 .235/.308/.359 8 55 0 0 0.0
Bench Total 1004 .238/.321/.399 114 682 16 -1 1.5
Player PA BR AVG/OBP/SLG Outs BRAR RS WAR
Team Total 6344 861 .271/.354/.441 4100 220 32 25.5


BR: Absolute linear weights batting runs based on estimated playing time, not adjusted for position.
Outs: Outs made while batting. Team outs should add up to around 4100 over a full season.
BRAR: Batting runs above replacement level at position.
RS: Runs saved compared to average, using an average of zone rating and UZR pro-rated to projected playing time.
WAR: Wins above replacement (BRAR + RS).

Moving Ellsbury to LF from CF makes him a plus defender according to my projections, so it looks like the Red Sox can run out a defense that is at least average at every position (I'm not including catchers for now, so Victor Martinez may change that). If these numbers are to be believed, the red Sox have probably made themselves 40 to 50 runs better defensively with the moves they've made this offseason.

Standard caveats about defensive metrics having more uncertainty than offensive or pitching metrics apply here, so don't take this as definitive proof or anything.

I haven't really finalized their pitching depth chart so I'm not going to post it yet, but with the one I have worked up they look like a .598 Pythagenpat team right now, which is .025 points worse than the Yankees were when I ran their numbers. That's the difference between a 97 win team and 101 win team in a neutral league, though we probably want to knock off a couple of wins frome each team to account for being in the AL East.

So right now, I still think the Yankees are better by a few games, but in a 162 game season that's not much of a difference, and of course a lot can change between now and the end of the 2010 season.
--Posted at 8:21 pm by SG / 71 Comments | - (118)




Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Roy Halladay vs. Cliff Lee

Answering Rich‘s request, here’s how CAIRO would project Roy Halladay and Cliff Lee over the next four years.  Both are projected as Phillies with the same offense behind them.

Roy Halladay

Year Age W L IP H R ER HR BB SO RA ERA FIP RSAR WAR
2010 32 18 8 233 206 82 79 20 40 204 3.18 3.03 3.15 71.6 7.2
2011 33 17 8 224 199 81 75 19 37 183 3.25 3.00 3.24 67.3 6.7
2012 34 16 8 208 185 74 68 18 33 171 3.19 2.95 3.22 63.6 6.4
2013 35 15 7 198 176 71 66 17 32 163 3.25 3.01 3.25 59.5 6.0
Total 66 31 863 765 308 288 73 142 721 3.22 3.00 3.21 262.1 26.2


Cliff Lee

Year Age W L IP H R ER HR BB SO RA ERA FIP RSAR WAR
2010 31 17 9 233 231 97 88 20 51 189 3.73 3.39 3.43 57.5 5.7
2011 32 15 9 211 211 84 78 18 42 164 3.59 3.30 3.40 55.4 5.5
2012 33 14 8 200 199 80 73 17 39 149 3.59 3.31 3.46 52.3 5.2
2013 34 13 8 191 192 77 71 16 37 143 3.61 3.32 3.46 49.7 5.0
Total 59 35 835 834 337 309 71 169 645 3.63 3.33 3.43 214.9 21.5


RA: Runs allowed per nine innings
ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings
FIP: Fielding independent pitching
RSAR: Runs saved above replacement level
WAR: Wins above replacement level (RSAR divided by 10)

I upped Lee's 2010 forecast innings to match Halladay, but his 2007 still affects his 2010 forecast. Of course, an objective projection system shouldn't ignore that 2007, even if we have reasons to think it's irrelevant.

It's an upgrade for Philly in the area of about one win per season, even assuming they could've inked Lee to the same extension going forward, which doesn't sound like it was ever a realistic possibility.

--Posted at 6:39 pm by SG / 72 Comments | - (137)




Friday, October 30, 2009

2009 World Series Odds after Game 2

With the Yankees win last night, here's how the revised playoff odds look. First, here are the estimated team numbers for the remaining games.



#games 5
home games 2
#outs 125
offense 29.2
pitching 20.2
defense -0.2
wpct .661
162 gm equiv 107-55




#games 5
home games 3
#outs 125
offense 27.8
pitching 21.7
defense 0.8
wpct .638
162 gm equiv 103-59


World Series Odds
Yankees: 54.4%
Phillies: 45.6%


On an unrelated note, The Hardball Times has posted their top ten Yankee prospect list (along with some other team's). Top Prospect Alert also has a top ten list up.
--Posted at 9:05 am by SG / 181 Comments | - (197)




Thursday, October 29, 2009

Updated World Series Odds after Game 1

Yankees: 41.8%
Phillies: 58.2%

Wonderful.

--Posted at 7:55 am by SG / 140 Comments | - (177)




Tuesday, October 27, 2009

2009 World Series Preview: Phillies vs. Yankees

We’re down to the final two in the quest for the World Series Championship. Can the Phillies make it two in a row, or will getting through the Yankees be too much for them? Let’s take a look…

Phillies
The Phillies beat Colorado 3-1 in the NLDS, scoring 20 runs and allowing 15. They followed that up by beating the higher-seeded LA Dodgers 4-1 in the NLCS, scoring 35 runs and allowing 16. Here's how their position players project offensively and defensively.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
jimmy rollins ss 34 .274 .330 .452 .338 .309 -.029 5 23 3
shane victorino cf 33 .291 .352 .437 .346 .350 .004 5 21 -1
chase utley 2b 33 .299 .393 .519 .395 .394 -.001 6 20 11
ryan howard 1b 32 .280 .376 .567 .399 .391 -.008 6 20 0
jayson werth rf 31 .273 .374 .481 .372 .378 .006 5 19 6
raul ibanez lf 31 .294 .362 .513 .375 .378 .003 5 20 -5
pedro feliz 3b 30 .260 .303 .410 .310 .304 -.006 3 21 10
carlos ruiz c 19 .256 .342 .395 .328 .341 .014 2 12 2
greg dobbs 3b 8 .283 .333 .433 .334 .296 -.037 1 5 -3
matt stairs lf 8 .257 .347 .439 .344 .336 -.008 1 5 2
paul bako c 2 .222 .301 .311 .279 .292 .013 0 1 -1
ben francisco rf 8 .258 .326 .424 .328 .330 .002 1 5 -2
eric bruntlett 2b 1 .231 .307 .313 .282 .207 -.075 0 1 -6
miguel cairo 2b 1 .241 .292 .335 .278 .296 .018 0 1 4
total 271 .279 .352 .467 .356 .352 -.004 39 175 1


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Jimmy Rollins did not have a good season this year, and so far in the postseason he's hit just .244/.279/.317. Despite that, he's locked in at the leadoff spot. We also know that we have a long track record of Rollins being better than he was in 2009, and we should assume that he'll be better going forward because of that. The more frequently he can get on base, the harder it will be to beat the Phillies because of the power that hits behind him and the fact that he's a very good base stealer (he's stolen 155 bases over 176 attempts since 2006, a success rate of 88.1%, about +26 runs). Rollins is a switch-hitter that doesn't have much of a platoon split, with an OPS of .762 vs. RHP and .783 vs. LHP. Rollins's defense at SS projects a touch above average over a full season.

Shane Victorino will likely bat second most of the time in this series. He's another switch-hitter. He's historically hit better against righties (.762 OPS vs. LHP compared to .836 vs. RHP). With the Yankees possibly throwing lefties in five of the seven games, that will be important for the Phillie since Ryan Howard becomes a much less effective player against lefties. Victorino's defensive projection is essentially average in CF.

Chase Utley generally bats third. He's probably one of the top ten players in baseball, even though he seems to get overlooked compared to Rollins and Howard. He's a very good hitter and a very good defender and he manages to hold his own against lefties despite being left-handed.

Ryan Howard is a monster against RHP. In his career he's hit .307/.409/.661 vs, righties in 2085 PAs, and has homered around once every 9.6 ABs. Against lefties, he falls off a ton as he's hit .226/.310/.444 in 1060 PAs. Even though it's 3000+ PAs, we still have to assume that those splits are more extreme than Howard's actual talent, but there's definitely a disparity there. It will be in the Yankees' best interest to use Phil Coke and Damaso Marte, even if neither inspires a ton of confidence, as often as they can if he comes up in a crucial situation late. Howard had a reputation as a horrible defender, but he's rated close to average recently and projects as average right now.

Jayson Werth's had a pretty interesting career path. He was drafted as a catcher in 1997 by the Orioles with the 22nd pick of the draft. After hitting poorly in A+ and AA in 2000, he was traded to Toronto for John Bale. He was moved to the OF and debuted in 2002 with the Blue Jays, seeing sporadic playing time over 2002 and 2003 before being traded to the Dodgers for Jason Frasor. He hit pretty well in 2004, but an A.J. Burnett pitch broke his left wrist in spring training of 2005, and caused him to scuffle when he played. It took him almost two seasons to recover from continued wrist injuries and he was signed to a one-year deal by the Phillies in 2006. He's hit .276/.376/.494 for the Phillies since then, while seeing time in all three OF spots.

Werth has been much better against lefties in his career (.284/.391/.570 vs. LHP compared to .252/.347/.423 vs. RHP). Again, like with Howard, we need to be aware that 2300 PAs with that kind of split doesn't necessarily mean that Werth's quite that good against lefties/bad against righties, but there's definitely some difference there. While the idea of protection in the batting order in and of itself has generally been shown to be more myth than fact, when you have two guys with diametrically opposite platoon splits like that back to back, it makes it a little harder for the other team to match up with them strategically. If you bring in Coke to get Howard with Werth on deck followed by Raul Ibanez, do you risk Coke against the righty Werth to deal with Ibanez after that, or do you pull Coke for a righty then figure out where to go with Ibanez after that?

Geez, I didn't expect to write so much about Werth.

Anyway, next is the aforementioned Ibanez. From the start of the season through July 30, Ibanez hit .305/.370/640. From July 3 on he hit .219/.311/.411. His overall line was right around where he'd project to be going forward. From 2006 to 2008 Ibanez was rated as one of the worst defenders in baseball, with a combined UZR of -38 in LF. For whatever reason in 2009 he was much better, at +7. He'd project around a -5 defender right now going forward. According to Phillies' manager Charlie Manuel, Ibanez may be DH'ed for the games at DNYS, which obviously makes him a little less harmful defensively.

Pedro Feliz is a very good defensive 3B. He's good enough defensively at 3B that it makees up for a bat that is often close to replacement level. Feliz is only slightly less abysmal against lefties (.252/.288/.417 vs. RHP compared to .259/.307/.438 vs. LHP in his career).

I have this nightmare of Carlos Ruiz playing the Jeff Mathis 'Johnny Bench' role in the World Series for some reason.

The Phillies have Greg Dobbs, Matt Stairs, Ben Francisco, Paul Bako, Eric Bruntlett and Miguel Cairo(Yay!) around on the bench. I'd expect we'll see Stairs and Francisco quite a bit, Stairs as a possible pinch-hitter DH, and Francisco spotted in the OF.

I know that we'll have pitchers "hitting" in at least two games in this series, but I don't do pitcher hitting projections so I just gave a few more PAs to the bench on the assumption that pitchers will be pinch-hit for when necessary. I'll do the same for the Yankees.

Moving on to the Phillies pitching, here are their projections.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cliff lee SP1 180 189 16 54 126 4.02 3.75 3.87 3.14 3.30 17 7.6
pedro martinez SP2 93 90 12 31 79 4.60 4.36 4.25 3.62 4.12 11 5.6
cole hamels SP3 187 179 24 49 169 4.27 4.00 3.84 4.32 3.74 12 5.7
joe blanton SP4 202 210 25 61 140 4.45 4.24 4.29 4.06 4.43 3 1.5
brad lidge CL 67 64 9 32 79 5.24 4.77 3.94 7.21 5.30 4 2.3
ryan madson SU 84 86 8 27 71 4.30 4.07 3.76 3.26 3.21 4 1.9
brett myers SU 97 84 10 33 97 3.88 3.67 3.60 4.84 6.07 4 1.7
j.a. happ MR 122 114 13 47 100 3.85 3.72 4.09 2.93 4.34 2 0.9
antonio bastardo MR 87 91 17 19 67 5.42 5.07 4.81 6.46 4.93 2 1.2
chad durbin MR 109 109 16 44 71 5.27 4.87 5.03 4.39 4.94 2 1.2
scott eyre MR 44 42 5 20 40 4.09 3.79 4.07 1.50 4.63 1 0.5
chan ho park LR 66 62 8 24 39 5.30 4.83 4.73 4.02 4.46 1 0.6
Total 63 61 7 20 52 4.29 4.03 4.00 30.6


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

The Phillies don't have a set rotation and have been moving pitchers creatively to deal with a bullpen that was less than stellar in 2009. It looks like what we know for sure is that Cliff Lee will start Game 1, Pedro Martinez will start Game 2, and Cole Hamels will start game 3. I'll revise the odds of the games and series as we go, but for now I'm going to go with the assumption that they will try and start Lee three times with Hamels and Pedro going twice each.

As far as the pen, I just mixed the innings around a bit.

Add it all up, and here's what we're looking at.

#games 7
home games 3
#outs 175
offense 39.3
pitching 30.6
defense 1.2
wpct .633
162 gm equiv 102-60


#outs: 25 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

So you're essentially looking at the equivalent of 102 win team once you factor in offense, defense, pitching and a one game home field disadvantage. How does that stack up against the Yankees and what does it mean as far as the World Series odds? I need to step away from Mom's basement for a bit but I'll add the Yankees to this post in a little while.

And here it is.

Yankees

The Yankees, who have a payroll of $200 million, were able to get through the Twins and Angels to make it to the World Series in the inaugural season of their $1.4 billion disgrace of a new stadium. Of course, the Yankees didn't earn their way to the World Series, they got here by buying a pennant, just like they did in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Oh wait, they didn't? You mean that you can spend a bunch of money but it doesn't guarantee anything? Weird.

Anyway, the Yankees were probably the best team in baseball in 2009. Here's how their position players project as we head into the Fall Classic.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
derek jeter ss 33 .314 .382 .440 .364 .384 .020 5 20 -3
johnny damon lf 32 .282 .357 .453 .354 .369 .015 5 21 0
mark teixeira 1b 32 .292 .386 .542 .397 .402 .005 6 20 4
alex rodriguez 3b 31 .293 .399 .546 .405 .402 -.003 6 19 -4
jorge posada c 31 .288 .378 .485 .376 .377 .002 5 19 -6
robinson cano 2b 28 .305 .339 .485 .354 .372 .018 4 18 -1
nick swisher rf 26 .243 .359 .461 .357 .373 .016 4 17 2
melky cabrera cf 24 .270 .328 .394 .318 .328 .010 3 16 0
hideki matsui dh 15 .279 .363 .474 .363 .375 .012 2 10 0
brett gardner cf 6 .257 .338 .342 .310 .318 .008 1 4 13
eric hinske rf 6 .238 .330 .449 .339 .347 .008 1 4 -1
jose molina c 6 .226 .270 .319 .261 .259 -.001 0 4 1
jerry hairston ss 5 .266 .317 .404 .314 .302 -.012 1 3 -3
ramiro pena ss 0 .240 .287 .304 .267 .306 .039 0 0 5
total 275 .285 .366 .476 .362 .372 .010 40 175 0


Derek Jeter, who makes $20M a year, had a nice rebound season in 2009 and has hit .297/.435/.595 so far in the postseason with three HRs, which is second on the team. Although he's still considered a horrendously awful defender by most of the sabermetrically savvy, the empirical fact is that he's been closer to average than bad of late and projects similarly going forward.

JohnnY 'Trader' Damon will bat second and play LF. Damon made $13M this year. His overall postseason line is an unimpressive .238/.273/.405, but he did hit .300/.323/.533 in the ALCS.

I could tell you about Mark Teixeira's offense and defense, but frankly, what I would rather talk about is that he was signed to an eight year/$180M contract. I really wish we'd stop getting articles about the Yankees that don't mention their payroll and budget and the cost of their new stadium.

I guess I'll mention that Teixeria's bat has been MIA for most of the postseason (.205/.273/.308). He's been playing stellar defense though.

Alex Rodriguez will bat cleanup, just like he has since he returned from his hip surgery. Did you know Rodriguez made $32M this season? I wish someone would let us know about that. Rodriguez has just about completely erased the stupid notion that he had some kind of psychological issue or character flaw that caused him to do all his producing in meaningless situation and that he was an unclutch postseason performer. If he can continue this type of play for just four more wins, he may even get honored as a True Yankee™. If I were Rodriguez, I'd tell all the people who are suddenly eager to embrace him after years of crapping on him to kiss my $32M ass.

Hideki Matsui or Jorge Posada will bat fifth most of the time. Matsui won't be able to play in the NL parks because they don't have the DH, although he'll likely get some PH appearances. Posada's defense has looked a little shaky in the postseason, but he's hit pretty well (.258/.361/.484). I could have sworn Matsui has hit .000/.000/.000 so far this postseason, but actually he's hit .233/.395/.367. Interesting note about Matsui and Posada, they both make money to play for the Yankees.

Robinson Cano, Nick Swisher and Melky Cabrera round out the bottom of the lineup. A good ALCS has Cabrera's postseason numbers up to respectability. Cano's numbers are kind of bleh, and Swisher has been awful. It'd be nice to get at least one of Cano or Swisher hitting more like they did in the regular season, especially in those silly games without a DH.

Some combination of Brett Gardner, Jose Molina, Eric Hinske, Francisco Cervelli, Freddy Guzman and Ramiro Pena will make up the bench. Molina will probably get a start or two with A.J. Burnett, even though their great chemistry didn't help much last time out.

As far as the pitching goes, here's how it looks.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cc sabathia SP1 229 213 20 63 198 3.84 3.44 3.42 3.37 3.38 17 7.2
a.j. burnett SP2 197 186 22 71 185 4.42 4.06 3.84 4.04 4.29 17 8.3
andy pettitte SP3 205 219 21 68 149 4.82 4.35 4.05 4.16 4.19 10 5.4
mariano rivera CL 71 55 5 12 69 2.32 2.18 2.72 1.76 2.94 6 1.5
phil hughes SU 79 66 5 27 81 3.45 3.25 3.02 3.03 3.15 3 1.2
david robertson SU 68 60 5 22 69 3.70 3.43 3.05 3.30 3.09 3 1.2
joba chamberlain MR 79 69 6 32 88 3.52 3.18 3.16 4.75 4.69 3 1.2
alfredo aceves MR 84 72 8 13 59 3.91 3.63 3.46 3.54 3.68 1 0.4
damaso marte MR 43 39 4 19 41 5.02 4.68 3.97 9.47 5.53 1 0.6
phil coke MR 61 63 6 15 46 4.73 4.41 3.62 4.50 4.73 1 0.5
chad gaudin MR 102 104 13 42 79 4.82 4.45 4.54 3.43 5.18 1 0.5
mark melancon LR 62 62 8 8 37 5.11 4.70 3.95 3.87 3.81 0 0.0
Total 63 59 6 20 56 4.02 3.66 3.55 28.1


The assumption here is the Yankee will risk going with a three man rotation of CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Andy Pettitte. With Sabathia, the evidence shows it's a risk worth taking. With Burnett, we do have a handful of starts that show he's been able to do it in the past as well. With Pettitte, we have 14 games started on three days rest in his career but none since 2006. I think it's a chance worth taking, the Yankees probably just need to have a long reliever shadowing in case of disaster, be it Gaudin or Aceves.

As far as the pen, it's Mo and the Musketeers. Hopefully Hughes pitches more like he did in the regular season than he has in the postseason so far. I'd like to see David Robertson pitch a little more, and as I mentioned with the Phillies we're probably going to see more Coke and Marte.

Adding up the Yankees offense, defense and pitching gives us this

#games 7
home games 4
#outs 175
offense 40.4
pitching 28.1
defense -0.3
wpct .666
162 gm equiv 108-54


So even before we think about the possible difference in leagues, the Yankees should be slight favorites in this series.

So what of the league difference? I haven't had the time to see if it's changed in 2009, but prior to this season I had the AL around 4% better than the NL. I arrived at this by looking at players who switched leagues and comparing how they ended up doing compared to how we should have projected them to do. In general, players who moved from the NL did 4% worse than they'd have projected to, and players who made the opposite switch did 4% better.

As far as translating that to wins at a team level, I'd probably just multiply the expected winning percentage of the Phillies by 0.96 to get them to an AL equivalent. So instead of being a .633/102 win team, they'd be more like a .607/98 win team in the AL.

So what happens if we play out the World Series 10,000 times in my Monte Carlo simulator using the projections and playing time estimates in this post?

Yankees: 58.7%
Phillies: 41.3%

Go Yankees.
--Posted at 1:54 pm by SG / 97 Comments | - (206)



Yahoo: Yankees may add Hinske to World Series roster

The New York Yankees and Philadelphia Phillies have until 10 a.m. Eastern tomorrow to set their rosters for the World Series and the rumor is that both could make some slight alterations.

The Yankees are apparently flip-flopping between adding left-handed hitter Eric Hinske(notes) or a 12th pitcher, according to the New York Post. The pitcher in question is supposedly right-handed reliever Brian Bruney(notes). “You could see us with 12 pitchers and you could see us change our roster,” Yanks general manager Brian Cashman coyly told the Post.

With three potential games without a DH, I think they HAVE to add Hinske, even if they have Hideki Matsui available as the first pinch hitting option.  Getting Freddie Guzman off the roster may be necessary to Girardi-proof things.  I also think it’s pretty hard to make a case to add Brian Bruney to the bullpen when you look at how the pen was used in the ALCS:

Mariano Rivera: 7 IP
Phil Hughes: 2.2 IP
David Robertson: 2 IP
Joba Chamberlain: 1.2 IP
Damaso Marte: 1.1 IP
Alfredo Aceves: 1.1 IP
Chad Gaudin: 1 IP
Phil Coke: 0.2 IP

Maybe instead of adding Bruney they could use Robertson for an extra third of an inning or something.  Marte and Coke will also need to be used more in the World Series because of the Phils’ lefty bats.  I was thinking dump Gaudin if they want to add Bruney, but he could be very useful in a ‘get Jayson Werth’ ROOGY type spot or two.

I’m waiting for rosters to be announced before doing any preview type crap, so I’ll look to get that up later today or tomorrow morning.

--Posted at 7:54 am by SG / 76 Comments | - (147)




Monday, October 26, 2009

2009 ALCS Run Values

I was thinking about the fact that CC Sabathia was named ALCS MVP over Alex Rodriguez, so I thought I should see if there was a way to compare their actual contributions. Then I figured I may as well do it for everyone who played in the ALCS, so here it is.

Name TEAM Pos PA/IP BR/Rsaa
Alex Rodriguez NYY 3B 29 5.72
CC Sabathia NYY SP 16.0 5.17
Jeff Mathis LAA C 12 3.25
Mariano Rivera NYY RP 7.0 2.14
Vladimir Guerrero LAA DH 28 2.01
Andy Pettitte NYY SP 12.7 1.68
Melky Cabrera NYY CF 26 1.37
Derek Jeter NYY SS 33 0.99
Johnny Damon NYY LF 31 0.95
David Robertson NYY RP 2.0 0.90
Howard Kendrick LAA 2B 15 0.86
Kevin Jepsen LAA RP 3.7 0.64
Damaso Marte NYY RP 1.3 0.60
Robinson Cano NYY 2B 27 0.56
Brett Gardner NYY CF 3 0.48
Chad Gaudin NYY RP 1.0 0.45
Torii Hunter LAA CF 28 0.43
Brian Fuentes LAA RP 3.0 0.34
Jorge Posada NYY C 25 0.31
Phil Coke NYY RP 0.7 0.30
Phil Hughes NYY RP 2.7 0.20
Jerry Hairston Jr. NYY 3B 2 0.13
Jason Bulger LAA RP 2.3 0.05
Reggie Willits LAA CF 0 0.00
Jose Molina NYY C 3 -0.09
Darren Oliver LAA RP 6.3 -0.16
Jered Weaver LAA SP 6.3 -0.16
Francisco Cervelli NYY C 1 -0.22
Freddy Guzman NYY LF 1 -0.22
Joba Chamberlain NYY RP 1.7 -0.25
Erick Aybar LAA SS 21 -0.33
Joe Saunders LAA SP 10.3 -0.37
Ervin Santana LAA RP 5.7 -0.46
Hideki Matsui NYY DH 26 -0.49
Gary Matthews LAA CF 5 -0.70
Maicer Izturis LAA 2B 11 -1.07
Alfredo Aceves NYY RP 1.3 -1.40
Mike Napoli LAA C 9 -1.41
John Lackey LAA SP 12.3 -1.47
Mark Teixeira NYY 1B 30 -1.60
Bobby Abreu LAA RF 29 -1.74
Kendry Morales LAA 1B 25 -1.89
Nick Swisher NYY RF 23 -2.15
Juan Rivera LAA LF 25 -2.27
A.J. Burnett NYY SP 12.3 -2.47
Matt Palmer LAA RP 2.7 -2.80
Chone Figgins LAA 3B 26 -2.81
Scott Kazmir LAA SP 4.7 -2.91


I still haven't found any place that is tracking postseason defense, so I'm just looking at offense and pitching. The last column is the runs above average for each player. In this case, for hitters, I'm comparing their linear weights batting runs per PA to the ALCS average. So if we look at Rodriguez, he created 9.2 BR(batting runs) in 29 PAs, compared to the ALCS average of 59.35 in 494 PA. (9.2/29 - 59.35/494) gives us how many BR per PA he was above average, then multiplying that by his actual PA (29) gives us a total. In this case, 5.72. I'm not adjusting for park or for position.

For pitchers, I'm just using ALCS average RA minus pitcher RA divided by nine to get the rate of runs allowed per IP, then multiplying by IP. So for CC, it's 4.03 minus 1.13 divided by nine, which gives us CC saving .323 runs per IP compared to the ALCS average. Multiply that by the 16 IP and we get 5.17 runs saved above average.

It's pretty interesting to see how much greater Mo's impact can be in the postseason, simply by virtue of the percentage of IP he is responsible for compared to the regular season. Factoring in leverage, you can probably go back through the years and make a case for Mo as MVP in several postseasons.
--Posted at 9:21 am by SG / 179 Comments | - (232)




Sunday, October 25, 2009

Should the Yankees Pitch Sabathia Instead of Pettitte in Game 6?

Since this topic has come up, here's what the numbers say. Bear in mind, the Yankees have no intention of changing their rotation, so this is simply theoretical.

First up, here's what it looks like if neither team changes who is scheduled to pitch Games 6 and 7.

Matchup LAA NYY
Saunders vs. Pettitte .396 .604
Weaver vs. Sabathia .389 .611
ALCS Win Probability .154 .846


The listed numbers are the probabilities for each team to win based on the pitching matchups and adjusting for homefield advantage, assuming each team uses their best lineup. So the Yankees have a 84.6 probability of winning the ALCS with the current matchups

If they throw Sabathia in Game 6 and reserve Pettitte for a Game 7 if needed, here's what those numbers look like, assuming no changes for the Angels.

Matchup LAA NYY
Saunders vs. Sabathia .334 .666
Weaver vs. Pettitte .451 .549
ALCS Win Probability .151 .849


If the Angels take advantage of the extra off day to pitch Weaver tonight and Lackey on three days rest in a Game 7 if needed, here's what that looks like, but given the fact that Saunders has pitched well over the second half of the season and pitched well in Game 2, it's doubtful the Angels would skip him.

Matchup LAA NYY
Weaver vs. Pettitte .451 .549
Lackey vs. Sabathia .382 .618
ALCS Win Probability .172 .828


Lastly, if the Angels do shuffle their rotation and the Yankees counter it with Sabathia in Game 6, here's what that would look like.

Matchup LAA NYY
Weaver vs. Sabathia .389 .611
Lackey vs. Pettitte .444 .556
ALCS Win Probability .173 .827


I've assumed no difference in any of the pitchers' projections based on them pitching with a varying rest.

Basically, it makes a minimal difference overall if the Yankees pitch Pettitte tonight and reserve Sabathia in case a Game 7 is needed, whether the Angels juggle their rotation or not. With the fact that holding Sabathia tonight makes him available sooner in the World Series if by some miracle the Yankees win today, I don't see an argument to pitch Sabathia in tonight's game. It's not like they're throwing Sergio Mitre out there if they use Pettitte.

--Posted at 9:54 am by SG / 54 Comments | - (124)




Thursday, October 22, 2009

2009 AL/NL Postseason Batting Stats Through Game Four of the ALCS

player tm lg pa ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb ibb so hbp gdp sb cs avg obp slg woba braa
Alex Rodriguez NYY AL 32 27 9 11 1 0 5 11 4 1 4 0 0 1 0 .407 .469 1.000 .579 7.14
Carlos Gonzalez COL NL 19 17 5 10 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 .588 .632 .882 .643 4.99
Ryan Howard PHI NL 35 29 7 11 4 1 2 14 5 1 7 0 0 0 1 .379 .457 .793 .490 4.54
Carlos Ruiz PHI NL 30 23 4 9 1 0 1 7 6 0 2 1 1 1 0 .391 .533 .565 .493 3.98
Derek Jeter NYY AL 36 31 7 10 2 0 3 5 5 2 3 0 1 0 1 .323 .417 .677 .443 3.77
Andre Ethier LAD NL 31 27 6 9 3 1 2 5 3 0 5 1 0 0 1 .333 .419 .741 .462 3.26
Jorge Posada NYY AL 28 24 3 8 1 0 2 3 4 0 5 0 0 1 0 .333 .429 .625 .455 3.23
Shane Victorino PHI NL 37 32 7 11 1 1 2 4 3 0 3 1 0 2 1 .344 .405 .625 .431 2.90
Chase Utley PHI NL 36 29 7 10 0 0 1 2 7 0 4 0 0 2 0 .345 .472 .448 .433 2.88
Howie Kendrick LAA AL 16 16 4 5 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 .313 .313 .625 .518 2.72
Colby Rasmus STL NL 11 9 1 4 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 .444 .545 .778 .551 2.01
Nick Punto MIN AL 12 9 0 4 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 .444 .583 .556 .508 1.94
Erick Aybar LAA AL 27 25 3 8 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 .320 .296 .480 .403 1.90
Bobby Abreu LAA AL 33 25 5 7 3 0 0 1 8 3 6 0 0 0 1 .280 .455 .400 .383 1.75
James Loney LAD NL 28 26 2 8 0 0 1 2 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 .308 .357 .423 .411 1.72
Jayson Werth PHI NL 34 28 7 6 0 1 3 6 6 1 10 0 2 0 0 .214 .353 .607 .396 1.65
Joe Mauer MIN AL 14 12 1 5 1 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 .417 .500 .500 .449 1.54
Hideki Matsui NYY AL 29 23 1 6 1 0 1 4 6 0 7 0 1 0 0 .261 .414 .435 .382 1.52
Jeff Mathis LAA AL 10 9 0 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .444 .400 .778 .462 1.22
Vladimir Guerrero LAA AL 32 29 4 9 1 0 1 4 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 .310 .375 .448 .363 1.15
Julio Lugo STL NL 6 5 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 .400 .500 .600 .560 1.15
Denard Span MIN AL 15 15 1 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 .400 .400 .467 .399 1.01
Yorvit Torrealba COL NL 15 14 1 5 2 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 .357 .333 .714 .414 0.96
Michael Cuddyer MIN AL 14 14 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .429 .429 .429 .386 0.77
Skip Schumaker STL NL 8 6 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 .333 .500 .500 .451 0.77
Manny Ramirez LAD NL 30 29 3 8 3 0 1 4 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 .276 .300 .483 .363 0.59
Jim Thome LAD NL 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 .333 .600 .333 .474 0.58
Seth Smith COL NL 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 .200 .333 .200 .423 0.43
Albert Pujols STL NL 13 10 0 3 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 .300 .462 .300 .374 0.38
Matt Stairs PHI NL 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .667 .000 .480 0.36
Cole Hamels PHI NL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .667 .000 .480 0.36
Mark DeRosa STL NL 13 13 1 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .385 .385 .462 .372 0.36
Torii Hunter LAA AL 33 27 2 6 2 0 1 3 5 1 4 1 2 0 1 .222 .364 .407 .334 0.34
Jason Hammel COL NL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 1.000 .000 .720 0.33
J.D. Drew BOS AL 10 9 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 .222 .300 .556 .355 0.29
Melky Cabrera NYY AL 32 29 3 8 1 0 0 4 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 .276 .344 .310 .332 0.27
Jerry Hairston NYY AL 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 .450 0.22
Mark Loretta LAD NL 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 .450 0.19
Aaron Cook COL NL 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 .450 0.19
Ian Stewart COL NL 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .500 .000 .360 0.03
Russell Martin LAD NL 27 21 2 5 1 0 0 3 4 0 3 2 0 0 0 .238 .407 .286 .341 0.02
Eric Bruntlett PHI NL 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Brad Lidge PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
George Sherrill LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Hong-Chih Kuo LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Scott Eyre PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Chan Ho Park PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Ryan Madson PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Ronald Belisario LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Chad Durbin PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Scott Elbert LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Ramon Troncoso LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Hiroki Kuroda LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Juan Castro LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Antonio Bastardo PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Franklin Morales COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Huston Street COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Joe Beimel COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Rafael Betancourt COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Jose Contreras COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
John Smoltz STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Jason Motte STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Dennys Reyes STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Ryan Franklin STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Trever Miller STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Brett Myers PHI NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Jeff Weaver LAD NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Kyle McClellan STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Jason Marquis COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Matt Daley COL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Mitchell Boggs STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Blake Hawksworth STL NL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.00
Jose Molina NYY AL 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .300 -0.06
Ryan Ludwick STL NL 13 12 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .333 .385 .333 .332 -0.09
Brett Gardner NYY AL 4 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 .667 .500 .667 .293 -0.10
Jason Giambi COL NL 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 .300 -0.11
Ron Belliard LAD NL 29 26 3 8 0 0 0 1 3 0 6 0 0 1 0 .308 .379 .308 .331 -0.23
Matt Tolbert MIN AL 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 .200 .333 .200 .275 -0.25
Clayton Kershaw LAD NL 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .333 .000 .240 -0.26
Francisco Cervell NYY AL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.28
Freddy Guzman NYY AL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.28
Casey Kotchman BOS AL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.28
Jonathan Broxton LAD NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Chad Billingsley LAD NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
J.A. Happ PHI NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Eric Young COL NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Matt Belisle COL NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Jason LaRue STL NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Joel Pineiro STL NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Joe Thurston STL NL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.30
Ubaldo Jimenez COL NL 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .250 .250 .250 .225 -0.40
Carlos Gomez MIN AL 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 .000 .333 .000 .245 -0.40
Maicer Izturis LAA AL 14 12 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 .167 .214 .250 .288 -0.42
Jason Bay BOS AL 11 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 .125 .364 .125 .278 -0.42
Yadier Molina STL NL 13 13 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 .308 .308 .385 .303 -0.42
Brendan Harris MIN AL 12 12 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 .250 .250 .417 .280 -0.44
Raul Ibanez PHI NL 32 27 5 6 1 0 1 8 5 0 7 0 1 0 0 .222 .344 .370 .324 -0.46
Ryan Spilborghs COL NL 10 9 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 .222 .300 .333 .286 -0.47
Johnny Damon NYY AL 34 33 4 7 1 0 2 3 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 .212 .235 .424 .304 -0.53
Alex Gonzalez BOS AL 7 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 .167 .286 .167 .231 -0.55
Jed Lowrie BOS AL 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.56
Juan Pierre LAD NL 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.59
Pedro Martinez PHI NL 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.59
Rick Ankiel STL NL 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.59
Troy Glaus STL NL 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.59
Todd Helton COL NL 19 16 5 3 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 .188 .316 .188 .304 -0.60
Jacoby Ellsbury BOS AL 13 12 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .250 .231 .417 .258 -0.72
Matt Holliday STL NL 13 12 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 .167 .231 .417 .275 -0.74
Gary Matthews LAA AL 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 .000 .200 .000 .144 -0.77
Jose Morales MIN AL 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.84
Joe Blanton PHI NL 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.89
Orlando Hudson LAD NL 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.89
Adam Wainwright STL NL 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.89
Chris Carpenter STL NL 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -0.89
Mike Lowell BOS AL 11 10 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 .200 .273 .200 .229 -0.89
Garrett Atkins COL NL 13 13 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 .231 .231 .385 .260 -0.91
Troy Tulowitzki COL NL 18 16 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 .250 .278 .375 .279 -0.96
Mike Napoli LAA AL 15 13 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 .154 .267 .231 .243 -1.04
Dustin Pedroia BOS AL 13 12 1 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .167 .231 .250 .220 -1.15
Orlando Cabrera MIN AL 15 13 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 .154 .267 .154 .233 -1.17
Victor Martinez BOS AL 12 11 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 .182 .250 .182 .210 -1.17
Rafael Furcal LAD NL 32 28 2 8 0 1 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 .286 .313 .357 .298 -1.17
Cliff Lee PHI NL 10 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 .250 .200 .250 .205 -1.18
Greg Dobbs PHI NL 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.18
Ben Francisco PHI NL 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.18
Miguel Cairo PHI NL 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.18
Brad Hawpe COL NL 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.18
Delmon Young MIN AL 14 12 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 1 0 .083 .214 .167 .211 -1.35
Randy Wolf LAD NL 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.48
Vicente Padilla LAD NL 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -1.48
Robinson Cano NYY AL 32 29 3 6 1 1 0 3 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 .207 .281 .310 .268 -1.49
Kendry Morales LAA AL 30 26 2 4 0 0 2 5 2 0 5 1 1 0 0 .154 .233 .385 .262 -1.58
Mark Teixeira NYY AL 34 30 4 4 0 0 1 1 4 0 8 0 1 0 0 .133 .235 .233 .248 -2.19
Kevin Youkilis BOS AL 12 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .083 .083 .167 .103 -2.28
Dexter Fowler COL NL 18 14 1 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 .214 .222 .214 .190 -2.36
Matt Kemp LAD NL 31 30 4 6 0 0 2 3 1 0 14 0 0 0 1 .200 .226 .400 .250 -2.45
Brendan Ryan STL NL 12 12 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .083 .083 .167 .103 -2.47
David Ortiz BOS AL 12 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 .083 .083 .083 .075 -2.58
Nick Swisher NYY AL 28 24 1 3 1 0 0 1 3 0 9 1 0 0 0 .125 .250 .167 .213 -2.67
Casey Blake LAD NL 28 26 1 5 0 0 0 2 2 0 5 0 1 1 0 .192 .250 .192 .221 -2.91
Jason Kubel MIN AL 14 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 .071 .071 .071 .064 -3.14
Jimmy Rollins PHI NL 38 38 4 9 3 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 .237 .237 .316 .240 -3.32
Pedro Feliz PHI NL 29 27 2 4 1 1 0 1 2 0 5 0 2 0 0 .148 .207 .259 .208 -3.33
Juan Rivera LAA AL 28 28 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 .179 .179 .214 .182 -3.42
Clint Barmes COL NL 15 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 -4.44
Chone Figgins LAA AL 34 28 1 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 8 1 0 0 0 .071 .176 .071 .139 -5.43


wOBA: Weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights scaled to OBP.
braa: Linear weights batting runs above 2009 AL/NL postseason average (not position or park-adjusted). So far in 2009 the AL averages are .238/.315/.394 and .322 wOBA. This is calculated as player wOBA minus league wOBA divided by 1.15 (which gets us to the difference in run values per plate appearance between player and league) then multipled by # of PAs.

You know what'd be tight? If our number three hitter hit better than our backup catcher going forward.

Anyway, while our natural tendency is to focus on the people who are doing poorly, like Mark Teixeira and Robinson Cano, having the top three offensive players (Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter and Jorge Posada) in the AL postseason has been a nice thing.

Here are the team totals for offense.

tm pa ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb ibb so hbp gdp sb cs avg obp slg woba braa
BOS 104 95 6 15 2 1 1 7 8 0 16 0 1 0 0 .158 .221 .232 .208 -9.0
LAA 277 242 26 54 14 2 5 23 23 5 44 5 6 5 2 .223 .296 .360 .296 -2.7
MIN 125 113 6 29 4 1 0 5 9 0 34 3 1 3 0 .257 .328 .310 .294 -1.4
NYY 296 260 37 67 9 1 14 35 32 4 57 2 5 3 3 .258 .341 .462 .357 12.8
AL 802 710 75 165 29 5 20 70 72 9 151 10 13 11 5 .232 .308 .372 .307 -0.1


Are we still allowed to complain about the offense if they've been better than anyone else in the AL? I say yes... I forgot to do the team pitching in yesterday's post, so here it is.

tm split ip h r er bb so hr ra era fip rsaa
NYY SP 47.7 33 11 10 12 39 3 1.89 2.27 3.26 6.8
MIN SP 17.3 15 8 8 3 15 3 4.16 1.56 4.24 -1.9
LAA SP 42.3 37 19 17 17 27 5 3.62 3.62 4.67 -2.1
BOS SP 17.7 15 9 9 6 11 2 4.59 3.06 5.30 -2.8
AL SP 125.0 100 47 44 38 92 13 3.17 2.74 3.99


fip: Fielding independent pitching. Regresses batting average on balls in play to average by focusing on HRs, BBs and Ks by a pitcher.
rsaa: Runs saved above average, calculated as lg RA (in the postseason) minus pitcher RA divided by nine times IP by the specific pitcher.

Yay Yankee starters.

Tm Split IP H R ER BB SO HR ra era fip rsaa
NYY RP 22.9 26 5 5 10 21 0 1.97 3.93 2.81 3.1
LAA RP 24.9 22 10 9 14 24 4 3.25 5.05 5.29 -0.2
MIN RP 9.6 8 7 6 6 7 3 5.60 5.60 7.66 -2.6
BOS RP 7.3 9 7 7 4 7 0 8.61 4.92 2.93 -4.4
AL RP 64.8 65 29 27 34 59 7 3.75 4.72 4.36


Yay Yankee relievers.

--Posted at 8:09 am by SG / 64 Comments | - (150)




Sunday, October 18, 2009

2009 AL Postseason Hitting Stats Through Game 2 of the ALCS (plus AL/NLCS probabilities update)

Tm PA AB R H 2B 3B HR BB SO HBP GDP SB CS AVG OBP SLG wOBA BRAA
NYY 150 134 19 33 5 0 6 14 28 1 2 1 0 .246 .320 .418 .329 5.1
LAA 142 124 17 28 7 1 2 12 26 3 2 3 1 .226 .303 .347 .303 1.7
MIN 125 113 6 29 4 1 0 9 34 3 1 3 0 .257 .328 .310 .295 0.6
BOS 104 95 7 15 2 1 1 8 16 0 1 1 0 .158 .221 .232 .208 -7.4
AL 521 466 49 105 18 3 9 43 104 7 6 8 1 .225 .298 .335 .290


wOBA: Weighted on-base average.
BRAA: Batting runs above average using linear weights. Average is for what all AL teams have combined for in the postseason so far (ALDS and ALCS).

Yeah, maybe we shouldn't be complaining about the Yankee offense...

I said I was going to write about some annoyances that came out of yesterday's game, but it looks like you all have beaten me to it.

So far it hasn't come back to haunt the Yankees, but I think that Joe Girardi is a little too quick with the hook on his relievers. While you should exploit platoon advantages where it makes sense, if you bring in Joba Chamberlain to get the last out in the seventh and he does it, why must you automatically pull him for Hughes, especially if there's no match up reason for doing so? Chamberlain and Hughes can both be effective for longer outings, and I think using up three or four relievers to get out of one inning can handicap the team if the game goes longer.

And here are the latest Monte Carlo playoff probabilities for the two leagues.

Team CS Win Odds
Yankees 69.9%
Phillies 53.9%
Dodgers 46.1%
Angels 30.1%
Red Sox 0.0%


Team WS Win Odds
Yankees 43.2%
Phillies 24.3%
Dodgers 19.8%
Angels 12.7%
Red Sox 0.0%


--Posted at 4:40 pm by SG / 85 Comments | - (169)




Thursday, October 15, 2009

2009 ALCS Preview: Angels vs. Yankees

Angels in Four.

OK, even though we already know what's going to happen, I'll run through the numbers for the hell of it.

Angels

After constantly having to hear and read about how they couldn't beat Boston, the Angels showed that they could in fact do so, sweeping the Red Sox out of the ALDS. John Lackey and Jered Weaver both pitched gems against Boston, which helped make up for the team hitting .228/.318/.351. Then again, when facing not one, not two, not three, not four, not five, not six, not seven, not eight, not nine, not ten, not eleven, BUT TWELVE aces, .228/.318/.351 is actually pretty respectable.

So here are the Angels' position player projections for offense and defense.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
chone figgins 3b 30 .288 .371 .381 .340 .354 .015 4 19 9
bobby abreu rf 30 .284 .379 .440 .362 .366 .004 4 19 -11
torii hunter cf 30 .285 .349 .492 .362 .375 .013 5 20 -2
vladimir guerrero dh 29 .304 .365 .511 .376 .344 -.033 5 18 0
juan rivera lf 29 .275 .320 .462 .336 .348 .012 4 20 8
kendry morales 1b 28 .290 .335 .495 .354 .388 .034 4 19 6
maicer izturis 2b 27 .281 .343 .401 .329 .346 .017 3 18 4
mike napoli c 25 .259 .355 .499 .367 .362 -.005 4 16 -5
erick aybar ss 24 .281 .317 .388 .308 .334 .025 3 16 6
howie kendrick 2b 7 .297 .332 .446 .337 .337 .000 1 5 6
gary matthews jr. lf 2 .257 .330 .401 .323 .315 -.008 0 1 -1
reggie willits lf 1 .261 .351 .322 .310 .213 -.097 0 1 5
jeff mathis c 5 .213 .276 .334 .270 .264 -.006 0 4 -4
robb quinlan lf 1 .263 .310 .374 .303 .271 -.031 0 1 0
total 268 .283 .348 .452 .347 .354 .008 37 175 1


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Although the MSM is going to beat us to death about the fact that the Angels have owned the Yankees in the postseason, let's look at some facts.

Here are the batters from the Angels who played against the Yankees in the 2002 postseason.

Troy Glaus
Brad Fullmer
Darin Erstad
David Eckstein
Garret Anderson
Scott Spiezio
Tim Salmon
Bengie Molina
Adam Kennedy
Shawn Wooten
Benji Gil

Here are the pitchers from the Angels who played against the Yankees in the 2002 postseason.

Brendan Donnelly
Scott Schoeneweis
Jarrod Washburn
Ben Weber
Kevin Appier
Troy Percival
Francisco Rodriguez
John Lackey
Ramon Ortiz

Here are the batters from the Angels who played against the Yankees in the 2005 postseason.

Bengie Molina
Casey Kotchman
Adam Kennedy
Vladimir Guerrero
Steve Finley
Chone Figgins
Darin Erstad
Orlando Cabrera
Garret Anderson
Juan Rivera
Robb Quinlan
Jose Molina

Here are the pitchers from the Angels who played the Yankees in the 2002 postseason.

Bartolo Colon
Scot Shields
John Lackey
Francisco Rodriguez
Kelvim Escobar
Paul Byrd
Brendan Donnelly
Ervin Santana

Players in bold are members of the 2009 Angels that will be facing the Yankees.

Wow. So we have one player who was on the 2002 Angels on the 2009 Angels (John Lackey). And we have four players who were on the the 2005 Angels that are on the 2009 Angels (Figgins, Lackey, Vlad Guerrero, and Juan Rivera).

More facts.

Here are the batters from the Yankees who played against the Angels in the 2002 postseason.

Bernie Williams
Rondell White
Robin Ventura
John Vander Wal
Alfonso Soriano
Juan Rivera
Jorge Posada
Raul Mondesi
Derek Jeter
Jason Giambi
Nick Johnson
Ron Coomer
Here are the pitchers from the Yankees who played against the Angels in the 2002 postseason.

Roger Clemens
Steve Karsay
Ramiro Mendoza
Mariano Rivera
Andy Pettitte
Mike Stanton
Jeff Weaver
Orlando Hernandez
Mike Mussina
David Wells

Here are the batters from the Yankees who played against the Angels in the 2005 postseason.

Bernie Williams
Gary Sheffield
Alex Rodriguez
Jorge Posada
Hideki Matsui
Derek Jeter
Jason Giambi
Bubba Crosby
Robinson Cano
Tino Martinez
John Flaherty
Ruben Sierra

Here are the pitchers from the Yankees who played against the Angels in the 2005 postseason.

Tom Gordon
Al Leiter
Mike Mussina
Mariano Rivera
Tanyon Sturtze
Scott Proctor
Chien-Ming Wang
Randy Johnson
Aaron Small
Shawn Chacon

So we have two hitters (Jeter and Posada) and two pitchers (Mo and Pettitte) who played for the Yanks against the Angels in 2002 who will be playing in this series. We have five hitters (Alex Rodriguez, Posada, Matsui, Jeter and Cano) and ONE pitcher from the 2005 Yankees (Mo) who will be playing in this series.

In what freaking way is what happened in 2002 and 2005 relevant to what will happen in 2009?

Anyway, looking at 2009, we'll keep reading about how the Yankees have to keep Chone Figgins off the bases if they want to win, and that's probably at least partially true.

Even though Bobby Abreu's power is below average for a corner OF, he still does a great job at getting on base and works long counts. Abreu loses about .040 points of OBP and .050 points of SLG versus lefties, so between Sabathia, Pettitte, Coke and Marte (maybe?) they have some potential to match up with him in an important situation

Torii Hunter had a great year in exceeding his projections, but it's an uncertain proposition that he's quite as good as he was in 2009. Hunter is about .050 points of OBP and .040 points of SLG better against lefties, which will be an issue if the Yankees go with Coke or Marte against Abreu in a situation that doesn't end an inning.

In terms of exceeing projections, Vlad Guerrero was the polar opposite of Hunter. He had a down year although it looks like it may have been at least partially health-related. If he's healthy he should probably be better than he was in 2009. Guerrero has a history of underachieving in the postseason but he got the biggest hit of the Angels/Red Sox ALDS.

Former Yankee and glove thief Juan Rivera (yeah, I know it was actually Ruben) will be an important factor in the Angels lineup. With the likelihood of the Yankees starting Sabathia and Pettitte in five of the seven games, Rivera's ability to hit lefties better than righties (career .293/.334/.516 vs. LHP, .281/.330/.448 vs. RHP) will undoubtably come into play at some point.

Kendry Morales had a very good year after what had been a disappointing start to his career. However, until we have more evidence that he's as good as he was in 2009 we have to assume he may have been a little bit over his head. Mike Napoli's a very good hitting catcher, but like the Yankees with Jose Molina and A.J. Burnett, the Angels may use Jeff Mathis as John Lackey's personal catcher, which is a downgrade of almost .100 pts of wOBA. The middle infield will generally consist of some combination of Maicer Izturis, Erick Aybar and Howie Kendrick.

Defensively, the Angels were about a win better than average as a team according to Fangraphs' UZR(+11.6). Standard zone rating thinks they were even better than that (+26). Aside from Abreu and Napoli, most of their defense projects as at least average, with Figgins and Rivera standing out as their best defenders.

On the pitching side, here's how they look.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
john lackey SP1 192 191 20 55 153 4.23 3.82 3.78 3.83 3.68 12 5.6
joe saunders SP2 192 211 25 62 105 4.94 4.61 4.76 4.60 5.17 12 6.6
jered weaver SP3 185 180 23 57 149 4.13 3.94 4.10 3.75 4.09 12 5.5
scott kazmir SP4 128 115 15 50 128 3.94 3.57 3.87 1.74 2.95 6 2.6
brian fuentes CL 62 53 5 22 58 3.94 3.66 3.52 3.93 4.25 5 2.2
ervin santana SU 72 65 7 24 68 3.51 3.30 3.17 5.03 4.91 5 2.0
darren oliver SU 70 66 7 20 53 3.74 3.54 3.77 2.71 3.21 4 1.7
jason bulger MR 59 48 4 24 66 3.18 3.10 2.97 3.56 3.88 4 1.4
kevin jepsen MR 54 55 3 20 44 4.40 4.08 3.26 4.94 2.96 2 1.0
matt palmer MR 134 136 10 40 84 4.49 4.26 3.85 3.93 4.71 1 0.5
jose arredondo MR 68 74 9 26 52 5.44 5.15 4.47 6.00 4.38 0 0.0
sean o'sullivan LR 119 154 16 21 54 6.84 6.45 4.51 5.92 6.02 0 0.0
Total 63 61 7 21 51 4.15 3.87 3.93 29.1


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

Based on what I've read, it looks like they're slotting their rotation as Lackey -> Saunders -> Weaver -> Kazmir, which sets up the first three to pitch twice in this series. In terms of projected ERA, Lackey is the third best starting pitcher in this series behind his Game 1 mound opponent, CC Sabathia and Angels Game 4 starter Scott Kazmir. Lackey's a good pitcher who pitched very well against Boston in the ALDS, and with free agency looming he's got a shot at making himself even wealthier with more shutdown pitching in the ALCS. Lackey pitched once against the Yankees, allowing two runs over seven innings. Of course that doesn't mean much when trying to predict how he'll do in this series.

Although he's scheduled to start Game 2, Joe Saunders doesn't have a great projection. In fact, he projects worse than any other starter in this series. He's a lefty, which may be beneficial in Yankee Stadium since it will force Teixeira, Posada, Swisher and Cabrera to bat righty. He's a low strikeout pitcher (4.89 K per 9 in 2009, 4.94 projected) with decent control. He gave up 29 HRs in 2009, let's hope he gives up a few more before the year is out. Saunders faced the Yankees twice in 2009 and allowed three HRs in 13.1 IP, with a 4.72 ERA.

Jered Weaver is probably neck and neck with A.J. Burnett as far as being the third best starter in this series if we don't trust Scott Kazmir's projection. The Yankees saw him three times this year and hit him pretty well (5.59 ERA against them) but againt that is not necessarily predictive.

Scott Kazmir pitched very well once acquired by Los Angeles, but blew up against Boston in the ALDS. His projection is based on a long history of being really good, but I think it's probably a little too rosy given where he is right now.

It's a good rotation, even if they don't have someone like Roy Halladay at the top.

The bullpen is where things get interesting. Brian Fuentes has been the nominal closer, but he didn't pitch as well Darren Oliver or Jason Bulger. I'd guess Fuentes will still get the opportunity to close based on platoon matchups, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Scioscia use anyone of his top relievers in the closer role if needed.

Oliver is a lefty who can give the Angels full innings, and he has actually had a reverse platoon split over the last three years (.259/.301/.415 vs. LHB compared to .233/.299/.317 vs. RHB).

Bulger had a very good season and gets into the mid-90s with his fastball which he throws about 55% of the time. He's also got a curve that he throws about 40% of the time and a changeup that he doesn't throw a lot.

Ervin Santana didn't pitch against Boston, but like I said in the ALDS preview, he's got a 97mph fastball and could be the Angels' equivalent of Phil Hughes. The projection above is the relief equivalent of his starter projection, he'd project about .75 runs of ERA worse as a starter. Jepsen throws even harder (average fastball velocity in 2009 was 96.2). His peripherals were very good this year (2.96 FIP) even if his ERA doesn't really impress.

This is a NOT an 85-87 win adjusted standings team. This is a very good team. How good? I'll tell ya.

#games 7
home games 3
#outs 175
offense 36.6
pitching 29.1
defense 0.7
wpct .615
162 gm equiv 100-62


#outs: 27 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

Will that be good enough? I'll let you know in a bit.

Update: It's been a bit.

Yankees

I'm still saying Angels in four, but consider this me playing devil's advocate.

Even though the Yankees have an unfair advantage due to market size and basically bought the World Series this year, rumor has it they are actually going to play the games. If they really are, here's what we have to look forward to.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
derek jeter ss 33 .314 .382 .440 .364 .384 .020 5 20 -3
johnny damon lf 32 .282 .357 .453 .354 .369 .015 5 21 0
mark teixeira 1b 31 .292 .386 .542 .397 .402 .005 5 19 4
alex rodriguez 3b 30 .293 .399 .546 .405 .402 -.003 5 18 -4
hideki matsui dh 28 .279 .363 .474 .363 .375 .012 4 18 0
jorge posada c 27 .288 .378 .485 .376 .377 .002 4 17 -6
robinson cano 2b 27 .305 .339 .485 .354 .372 .018 4 18 -1
nick swisher rf 24 .243 .359 .461 .357 .373 .016 3 15 2
melky cabrera cf 20 .270 .328 .394 .318 .328 .010 2 13 0
brett gardner cf 7 .257 .338 .342 .310 .318 .008 1 5 13
freddy guzman cf 5 .239 .308 .320 .286 .129 -.157 0 3 0
jose molina c 8 .226 .270 .319 .261 .259 -.001 1 6 1
jerry hairston ss 3 .266 .317 .404 .314 .302 -.012 0 2 -3
ramiro pena ss 0 .240 .287 .304 .267 .306 .039 0 0 5
total 275 .285 .366 .476 .361 .368 .007 40 175 0


You probably don't need a narrative from me on the Yankees, so I'm just presenting the projections. I will add this though.

Players AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB AVG OBP SLG BR
Rodriguez,. Jeter, Posada, Matsui 41 10 15 2 0 5 12 7 7 0 .366 .458 .780 15
Everyone Else 61 5 8 1 0 1 3 2 15 1 .131 .159 .197 6
Total 102 15 23 3 0 6 15 9 22 1 .225 .288 .431 21


BR are batting runs as calculated using linear weights. Those are the Yankees' stats from the ALDS. Against the Angels, that won't cut it.

As far as the pitching, here are the projections.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cc sabathia SP1 229 213 20 63 198 3.84 3.44 3.42 3.37 3.38 17 7.2
a.j. burnett SP2 197 186 22 71 185 4.42 4.06 3.84 4.04 4.29 12 5.9
andy pettitte SP3 205 219 21 68 149 4.82 4.35 4.05 4.16 4.19 12 6.4
mariano rivera CL 71 55 5 12 69 2.32 2.18 2.72 1.76 2.94 4 1.0
phil hughes SU 79 66 5 27 81 3.45 3.25 3.02 3.03 3.15 4 1.5
david robertson SU 68 60 5 22 69 3.70 3.43 3.05 3.30 3.09 3 1.2
alfredo aceves MR 84 72 8 13 59 3.91 3.63 3.46 3.54 3.68 3 1.3
joba chamberlain MR 131 114 10 54 146 3.52 3.18 3.16 4.75 4.69 3 1.2
damaso marte MR 43 39 4 19 41 5.02 4.68 3.97 9.47 5.53 2 1.1
phil coke MR 61 63 6 15 46 4.73 4.41 3.62 4.50 4.73 2 1.1
chad gaudin MR 102 104 13 42 79 4.82 4.45 4.54 3.43 5.18 1 0.5
mark melancon LR 62 62 8 8 37 5.11 4.70 3.95 3.87 3.81 0 0.0
Total 63 59 6 20 55 4.08 3.72 3.56 28.5


I'm assuming the Yankees will throw CC Sabathia on short rest in Game 4. I'm also assuming that Sabathia will not lose effectiveness on a rate basis, but will likely need to have his innings in Games 1 and 4 managed judiciously, so I gave him six innings in Games 1 and 7 and five innings in Game 4. I'll account for the fact that a rain out may require Chad Gaudin to get a start at the end.

So adding that up, here's how the Yankees look.

#games 7
home games 4
#outs 175
offense 40.2
pitching 28.5
defense -0.2
wpct .658
162 gm equiv 107-55


If we replace five innings of Sabathia with five innings of Gaudin, they look like this.

#games 7
home games 4
#outs 175
offense 40.2
pitching 29.1
defense -0.2
wpct .650
162 gm equiv 105-57


So, if we run the ALCS with three Sabathia starts 10,000 times, here's what the Monte Carlo Simulator sees.

Yankees 60.6%
Angels 39.4%
Red Sox 0.0%

I think that's probably a little high on the Yankees and low on the Angels, although I guess HFA is a big part of it.

And if we instead run it with two Sabathia starts and one Gaudin start 10,000 times, here's what the Monte Carlo Simulator sees.

Yankees 58.7%
Angels 41.4%
Red Sox 0.0%

Go Yankees.
--Posted at 12:07 pm by SG / 77 Comments | - (197)




Wednesday, October 14, 2009

2009 NLCS Preview: Dodgers vs. Phillies

Two teams enter. One team will win. The winning team will be able to claim themselves the best team in the National League, which is akin to being the most insightful Baseball Tonight anchor, or the best trade made by the Twins’ Bill Smith.

Who will the Angels be facing in the World Series? Let's see what the numbers think... The idea behind this preview is the same as these DS previews.
Yankees
Twins
Red Sox/Angels
Phillies/Rockies
Dodgers/Cardinals

Instead of just looking at 2009 data and using whatever the teams did over the course of 2009 as an estimate of team talent, I feel it's far more instructive to use revised projections that incorporate past data and to make sure we are only looking at the rosters as presently constituted.

The projections that I'm using here are not any different than the projections I used in the NLDS preview. The only difference is I've adjusted the number of games to 7 and adjusted playing time estimates.

Phillies
The Phillies are the only one of the four Championship Series teams to lose a game in the Divisional Series. They should be ashamed of themselves.

The projections are the same as they were for the DS,

First up, the position players.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
jimmy rollins ss 34 .274 .330 .452 .338 .309 -.029 5 23 3
shane victorino cf 33 .291 .352 .437 .346 .350 .004 5 21 -1
chase utley 2b 33 .299 .393 .519 .395 .394 -.001 6 20 11
ryan howard 1b 32 .280 .376 .567 .399 .391 -.008 6 20 0
jayson werth rf 31 .273 .374 .481 .372 .378 .006 5 19 6
raul ibanez rf 30 .294 .362 .513 .375 .378 .003 5 19 0
pedro feliz 3b 29 .260 .303 .410 .310 .304 -.006 3 20 10
carlos ruiz c 25 .256 .342 .395 .328 .341 .014 3 16 2
greg dobbs 3b 7 .283 .333 .433 .334 .296 -.037 1 5 -3
matt stairs lf 7 .257 .347 .439 .344 .336 -.008 1 5 2
paul bako c 3 .222 .301 .311 .279 .292 .013 0 2 -1
ben francisco cf 2 .258 .326 .424 .328 .330 .002 0 1 -8
eric bruntlett 2b 2 .231 .307 .313 .282 .207 -.075 0 1 -6
miguel cairo 2b 2 .241 .292 .335 .278 .296 .018 0 1 4
total 270 .279 .352 .467 .355 .352 -.004 39 175 1


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Chase Utley(.429/.556/.643) and Jayson Werth(.357/.500/.929) were the Key offensive players in the NLDS. Although Ryan Howard has the highest projected wOBA in the Phils' lineup, the Dodgers are going to likely to have at least four lefties on their NLCS roster (starters Randy Wolf and Clayton Kershaw, relievers Hong-Chih Kuo and George Sherrill). In any situations where Howard is facing one of those pitchers, we should expect him to perform significantly worse than that projection. I don't see the Phillies benching Howard against Wolf or Kershaw, so that means they probably need Werth to have a big series. Utley has generally done pretty well against lefties. He actually has a higher OBP in his career, although he loses some power. In his career, Ibanez has been about .090 OPS points worse against lefties, although he did hit them better than righties this year.

Defensively, the Phils look strong, with Utley and Pedro Feliz as the standouts.

Taking a look at the pitching staff...

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cole hamels SP1 187 179 24 49 169 4.27 4.00 3.84 4.32 3.74 12 5.7
joe blanton SP2 202 210 25 61 140 4.45 4.24 4.29 4.06 4.43 5 2.5
cliff lee SP3 180 189 16 54 126 4.02 3.75 3.87 3.14 3.30 12 5.4
pedro martinez SP4 93 90 12 31 79 4.60 4.36 4.25 3.62 4.12 5 2.6
brad lidge CL 67 64 9 32 79 5.24 4.77 3.94 7.21 5.30 4 2.3
ryan madson SU 84 86 8 27 71 4.30 4.07 3.76 3.26 3.21 4 1.9
brett myers SU 97 84 10 33 97 3.88 3.67 3.60 4.84 6.07 4 1.7
j.a. happ MR 122 114 13 47 100 3.85 3.72 4.09 2.93 4.34 3 1.3
jack taschner MR 48 54 5 21 38 5.46 5.01 4.31 4.91 5.28 3 1.8
chad durbin MR 109 109 16 44 71 5.27 4.87 5.03 4.39 4.94 2 1.2
scott eyre MR 44 42 5 20 40 4.09 3.79 4.07 1.50 4.63 3 1.4
joe blanton LR 202 210 25 61 140 4.45 4.24 4.29 4.06 4.43 6 3.0
Total 63 57 6 19 48 3.95 3.70 3.92 30.6


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

All we know for certain is that Cole Hamels is scheduled for Game 1 and Cliff Lee will start Game 3. The assumption here is that they will both pitch twice. That leaves three games to be started by some combination of Joe Blanton, Pedro Martinez and J.A. Happ. So I am giving them each five innings, assuming that if one of them isn't starting he'll pitch relief.

As far as the bullpen, I'm just going to spread the load around to get the Phils to 63 innings pitched. It looks like they're back to Brad Lidge as closer, with Ryan Madson getting the all-important 8th.

Add up the offense, defense and pitching, and here's what you get:

#games 7
home games 3
#outs 175
offense 39.0
pitching 30.6
defense 1.5
wpct .633
162 gm equiv 102-60


#outs: 27 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching and defense for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

Seems about right to me.

Dodgers
One of the stories that hasn't gotten enough play is about the Dodgers' manager facing the team he used to work for if circumstances allow both teams to advance to World Series. Joe Torre will be trying to lead his team into the World Series to face the Angels, for whom he worked as a broadcaster.

The Dodgers had the best record in the National League, and vanquished a very good St. Louis team in three games. Here's how they shape up in the NLCS, starting with the position players.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
rafael furcal ss 35 .282 .349 .408 .335 .317 -.019 4 23 2
orlando hudson 2b 34 .293 .362 .428 .348 .338 -.010 5 22 -1
manny ramirez lf 33 .303 .418 .549 .417 .411 -.006 6 19 -14
matt kemp cf 32 .301 .355 .493 .365 .362 -.003 5 21 2
james loney 1b 31 .293 .355 .443 .350 .337 -.013 4 20 -2
andre ethier rf 31 .292 .371 .507 .378 .373 -.005 5 19 -2
russell martin c 30 .278 .375 .406 .351 .315 -.036 4 19 -2
casey blake 3b 25 .271 .345 .459 .348 .360 .012 3 16 1
juan pierre cf 7 .297 .340 .378 .319 .333 .014 1 5 3
ronnie belliard 2b 7 .291 .344 .454 .346 .436 .089 1 5 -1
jim thome 1b 7 .253 .372 .476 .368 .374 .005 1 4 0
brad ausmus c 1 .239 .309 .313 .283 .306 .023 0 1 4
juan castro ss 1 .241 .280 .328 .269 .286 .017 0 1 -4
mark loretta 2b 1 .273 .346 .349 .316 .273 -.043 0 1 -2
total 275 .290 .363 .452 .360 .353 -.007 40 175 -1


The Dodgers' lineup actually has a higher projected wOBA than the Phillies, although their defense looks worse. One thing that will bear watching is how the Dodgers use Andre Ethier against Hamels and Lee. In his career, Ethier has hit .253/.317/.382 vs. LHP compared to .305/.377/.538 vs. RHP. They don't have a ton of options to platoon Ethier with as far as I can tell, although maybe Juan Pierre gets a look.

As far as the pitching goes...

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
clayton kershaw SP1 159 140 13 74 150 4.07 3.91 3.75 2.79 3.16 12 5.4
randy wolf SP2 164 157 20 56 128 4.37 4.11 4.24 3.23 3.97 12 5.8
vicente padilla SP3 147 162 19 52 95 5.61 5.18 4.68 4.92 4.72 5 3.1
hiroki kuroda SP4 163 161 14 45 109 4.50 3.97 3.84 3.76 3.66 5 2.5
jonathan broxton CL 79 61 5 33 101 3.52 3.13 2.69 2.61 2.03 5 2.0
george sherrill SU 47 40 4 24 47 3.59 3.53 3.85 2.40 3.20 4 1.6
ramon troncoso SU 73 81 4 23 48 4.30 3.93 3.60 2.72 3.57 3 1.4
ronald belisario MR 62 69 8 18 41 5.44 4.92 4.42 2.04 3.36 3 1.8
guillermo mota MR 64 52 5 25 55 3.57 3.44 3.71 3.45 4.30 3 1.2
hong-chih kuo MR 60 54 5 26 63 3.93 3.73 3.49 3.00 3.23 2 0.9
chad billingsley MR 181 168 17 88 162 4.26 3.99 4.06 4.03 3.82 5 2.4
jeff weaver LR 119 137 19 35 77 5.63 5.30 4.88 3.65 3.98 4 2.5
Total 63 55 6 23 51 4.01 3.75 3.85 30.6


It looks like the Dodgers will be starting Clayton Kershaw in Game 1 and Randy Wolf in Game 2. They are also rumored to be activating Hiroki Kuroda with an eye on starting him in Game 4. Although Vicente Padilla is penciled in as the third starter and would conceivably pitch a game 7, because his projection is pretty bad I restricted him to one start and game those innings to Chad Billinsgsley who will likely be in the pen.

The Dodgers's pen is pretty good, and as mentioned with the Phillies, having Sherrill and Kuo around will help them in trying to neutralize Ryan Howard in any crucial situations.

Adding up the Dodger's offense, defense and pitching looks like this:

#games 7
home games 4
#outs 175
offense 39.5
pitching 30.6
defense -0.8
wpct .613
162 gm equiv 99-63


So you've got a 99 win team with a one game home field advantage vs. a 102 win team with a one game home field disadvantage. If they played each other in a seven game series 10,000 times, here are the probabilities of advancing according to my Monte Carlo simulator

Phillies: 54.3%
Dodgers: 45.7%
Red Sox: 0%

--Posted at 5:06 pm by SG / 65 Comments | - (195)




Monday, October 12, 2009

2009 ALDS Run Values for Pitchers

Pitcher Bos G GS IP H R ER HR BB K RA ERA FIP RSAA
John Lackey LAA 1 1 7.1 4 0 0 0 1 4 0.00 0.00 2.52 2.99
Jered Weaver LAA 1 1 7.1 2 1 1 0 2 7 1.23 1.23 2.11 1.99
Andy Pettitte* NYY 1 1 6.1 3 1 1 0 1 7 1.42 1.42 1.46 1.58
Mariano Rivera NYY 3 0 3.2 4 0 0 0 1 7 0.00 0.00 0.20 1.49
A.J. Burnett NYY 1 1 6 3 1 1 0 5 6 1.50 1.50 3.70 1.44
Nick Blackburn Min 1 1 5.2 3 1 1 0 2 3 1.59 1.59 3.20 1.31
Daniel Bard Bos 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.00 0.00 0.53 1.22
Darren Oliver* LAA 3 0 2.1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.95
Carl Pavano Min 1 1 7 5 2 2 2 0 9 2.57 2.57 4.34 0.85
Matt Guerrier Min 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.81
CC Sabathia* NYY 1 1 6.2 8 2 1 0 0 8 2.70 1.35 0.80 0.72
Brian Fuentes* LAA 2 0 1.2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.68
Joba Chamberlain NYY 3 0 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.68
Jason Bulger LAA 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.41
Alfredo Aceves NYY 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.41
David Robertson NYY 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.41
Phil Coke* NYY 2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.27
Hideki Okajima* Bos 1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 3.20 0.14
Clay Buchholz Bos 1 1 5 6 2 2 1 1 3 3.60 3.60 5.20 0.04
Ramon Ramirez Bos 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00 - 0.00 0.00
Damaso Marte* NYY 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 - 0.00 0.00
Ron Mahay* Min 3 0 1.2 0 1 1 0 1 2 5.40 5.40 2.60 -0.32
Kevin Jepsen LAA 2 0 1.1 3 1 1 0 0 1 6.75 6.75 1.70 -0.46
Jon Rauch Min 3 0 1.1 1 1 1 0 2 0 6.75 6.75 7.70 -0.46
Jon Lester* Bos 1 1 6 4 3 3 1 4 5 4.50 4.50 5.70 -0.56
Takashi Saito Bos 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 9.00 9.00 3.20 -0.59
Jose Mijares* Min 2 0 0.2 1 1 1 1 1 0 13.50 13.50 27.20 -0.73
Francisco Liriano* Min 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 9.00 4.50 10.20 -1.19
Joe Nathan Min 2 0 2 5 2 2 1 1 2 9.00 9.00 9.20 -1.19
Phil Hughes NYY 3 0 2 5 2 2 0 1 3 9.00 9.00 1.70 -1.19
Josh Beckett Bos 1 1 6.2 5 4 4 0 1 3 5.40 5.40 2.75 -1.28
Billy Wagner* Bos 2 0 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 18.00 18.00 2.20 -1.59
Jonathan Papelbon Bos 2 0 2 4 3 3 0 2 1 13.50 13.50 5.20 -2.19
Scott Kazmir* LAA 1 1 6 5 5 5 1 3 1 7.50 7.50 6.53 -2.56
Brian Duensing* Min 1 1 4.2 7 5 5 1 1 3 9.64 9.64 5.34 -3.10
Lg Total 56 12 101.7 91 44 42 9 36 90 3.67 3.50 3.62


RSAA: Runs saved above average (postseason lg RA - pitcher RA divided by 9 times IP).

G G GS IP H R ER HR BB K RA ERA FIP RSAA
NYY 17 3 26.9 29 6 5 0 9 34 2.01 1.67 1.68 5.8
LAA 11 3 25.6 15 7 7 1 8 16 2.46 2.46 3.40 4.0
MIN 16 3 24.9 23 15 14 6 9 22 5.42 5.06 5.65 -4.0
BOS 12 3 24.3 24 16 16 2 10 18 5.93 5.93 4.02 -4.8


The pitchers are dominating the hitters so far in the AL postseason. Aside from Phil Hughes and Damaso Marte (who got bailed out by David Robertson and Mark Teixeira after allowing three hits to two batters), the Yankee pitching is kicking ass. Of course, it helps that they faced the worst of the AL postseason offenses.
--Posted at 3:10 pm by SG / 58 Comments | - (146)




Sunday, October 11, 2009

MLB.com: Angels 7, Red Sox 6

Looks like we know who’ll be playing the Twins in the 2009 ALCS, although Baseball Prospectus still gives the Red Sox a 15% chance of winning this round.

--Posted at 2:59 pm by SG / 37 Comments | - (148)




Saturday, October 10, 2009

Updated Division Series Odds Through Games of October 10, 2009

Team DS Win Odds G/L
Yankees (up 2-0) 94.0% 5.9%
Angels (up 2-0) 83.9% 18.2%
Dodgers (up 2-0) 82.7% -1.1%
Phillies (tied 1-1) 59.9% -4.2%
Rockies (tied 1-1) 40.1% 4.2%
Cardinals (down 0-2) 17.3% 1.1%
Red Sox (down 2-0) 16.1% -18.2%
Twins (down 2-0) 6.0% -5.9%


G/L: Gain/Loss (percentage change in probability of advancing to the next round since the prior run on Sept 9)

The NLDS odds changed slightly even though both series were idle because the Monte Carlo simulator makes random tweaks in the winning percentages during each iteration to account for the volatility of how a team may actually play over a small sample.

The key numbers to look at are the ones in the AL, where the Yankees and Angels made big gains by going up 2-0 with their wins tonight..
--Posted at 1:45 am by SG / 85 Comments | - (149)




Thursday, October 8, 2009

2009 ALDS Preview: Satan’s East Coast Team vs. Satan’s West Coast Team

Here’s a quick look at the Twins’ possible opponents for the next round…

Red Sox
The plucky underdogs from New England finished with the third-best record in the American League and took the wild card by eight games. Let's see how they look as presently constituted.

Although the Yankees ended up finishing eight games ahead of Boston, the actual difference between the two teams is more than likely smaller than that. Here's how their position players project for the ALDS, using my guess at the postseason roster (which isn't finalized yet).
Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
jacoby ellsbury cf 23 .300 .353 .420 .341 .336 -.005 3 15 -10
dustin pedroia 2b 22 .305 .370 .459 .362 .358 -.004 3 14 8
victor martinez c 22 .301 .376 .458 .366 .398 .032 3 14 1
kevin youkilis 1b 21 .294 .394 .510 .392 .414 .021 3 13 4
david ortiz dh 21 .270 .378 .539 .391 .342 -.049 4 13 0
jason bay lf 20 .274 .377 .517 .384 .394 .009 3 12 -14
j.d. drew rf 19 .276 .389 .493 .383 .394 .011 3 12 4
mike lowell 3b 19 .281 .336 .465 .345 .348 .003 3 13 -1
alex gonzalez ss 10 .270 .317 .417 .319 .324 .005 1 7 5
casey kotchman 1b 10 .279 .350 .427 .342 .339 -.003 1 7 7
rocco baldelli rf 4 .269 .327 .475 .344 .322 -.022 1 3 -1
jason varitek c 2 .230 .331 .396 .324 .311 -.013 0 1 1
jed lowrie ss 2 .253 .329 .407 .324 .211 -.112 0 1 14
nick green ss 1 .253 .312 .409 .314 .295 -.019 0 1 2
total 196 .286 .366 .475 29 124 0


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Keep in mind that these projections are for Fenway, which boosts run-scoring even more than DNYS. So even though the raw numbers look better than any other team's, once you adjust for park they go down a little. Still, this is a good offensive team, especially if they are starting Victor Martinez at catcher. In a neutral environment they're probably a little worse than the Yankees, but better than any other team in the postseason.

I know we like to mock the media's fascination with the Red Sox, but they deserve credit for how they've put their team together. In Dustin Pedroia and Kevin Youkilis they have two players among the best at their positions in baseball that they've drafted and developed themselves, and while additional farm product Jacoby Ellsbury is overrated because of his speed, he's a pretty valuable player on offense. The only player on offense that is below average is probably Alex Gonzalez, although we can probably add Jason "C" Varitek if he gets any starts.

So yeah, they can hit. What about the defense? Funny you should ask. The Red Sox weren't a very good defensive team this year if you go by the numbers (-17 UZR, -36 ZR). The ZR number is "not" adjusted for Fenway's disgraceful LF wall, the normal effect of that is around 15 runs, so they're probably closer to that -17 UZR number.

Jason Bay is pretty bad in LF, and it's not just a Fenway thing. His numbers in Pittsburgh since a knee injury a few years ago were also not that good. Jacoby Ellsbury "looks" good, and he had decent numbers before this year, but for whatever reason his numbers aren't so good this year. I'd probably split the difference with him. He's probably not as good as Red Sox fans think, but he's also probably not as bad as this year's numbers indicate. Pedroia, Youkilis, Alex Gonzalez and J.D. Drew all probably classify as good to great defensively. Mike Lowell used to be a good defender, but his mobility has been hampered by his hip injury. Overall, they were a below average defense in 2009 but they project around average now.

The pitching staff of the Red Sox gets a lot of attention, as well they should with somewhere in the order of 12 different aces. Here's how they look.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
jon lester SP1 182 184 18 66 154 4.22 4.06 3.88 3.41 3.21 12 5.6
josh beckett SP2 198 190 23 52 178 4.35 4.08 3.70 3.86 3.63 6 2.9
clay buchholz SP3 115 124 14 39 87 5.08 4.77 4.31 4.21 4.73 6 3.4
daisuke matsuzaka SP4 143 134 16 70 128 4.48 4.33 4.28 5.77 5.09 5 2.5
jonathan papelbon CL 65 50 5 18 73 2.58 2.26 2.72 1.85 2.98 3 0.9
billy wagner SU 46 34 4 14 54 3.37 2.71 2.94 1.97 2.47 3 1.1
daniel bard SU 77 69 6 32 70 4.55 4.19 3.60 3.65 3.30 3 1.5
hideki okajima MR 65 55 7 22 56 3.30 3.25 3.89 3.39 4.20 3 1.1
takashi saito MR 60 50 4 23 62 2.79 2.63 3.18 2.42 4.08 2 0.6
ramon ramirez MR 83 94 15 31 61 6.10 5.69 5.25 2.84 4.39 1 0.7
paul byrd MR 134 159 20 31 64 5.41 4.93 4.87 5.82 5.05 1 0.6
manny delcarmen LR 68 67 5 31 55 4.50 4.16 3.93 4.52 4.52 0 0.0
Total 45 43 5 16 40 4.18 3.92 3.82 20.9


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP
The Red Sox haven't officially announced a game 4 starter so I put Matsuzaka in there. If they are down 2-1 I could see them going back to Lester.

Although Josh Beckett projects slightly better, Lester is probably the best Red Sox starter. His projection underrates him because it still includes data from when he was recovering from cancer. If I were to go with my gut, I'd knock about 0.50 off his ERA and FIP, but I am not going to start making manual adjustments to my projections because I want to be as objective as possible. But yeah, figure Lester is better than his projection, and probably one of the top five starters in the postseason.

Beckett has a good postseason resume and generally has pretty good peripherals, but he's struggled some with the long ball this year. Whether it was a HR/FB fluke (12.8% in 2009, compared to 10.6% career) or a symptom of some back problems he's supposedly been having is probably the key question. Still, you'd be hard pressed to find a #2 starter who is as likely to dominate as Beckett.

Clay Buchholz has been hyped for a few years now and had shown both promise and awfulness, but he pitched pretty well this year for both Pawtucket and eventually Boston. He's already exceed his previous high for innings pitched in a season this year by about 40 innings so he may be starting to hit the wall as evidenced by his last two starts (8 IP, 13 H, 13 R, 6 HR, 3 BB and 10 K). It could also just be a blip.

Matsuzaka had a rough year after a very good (if somewhat lucky) 2008. He pitched well upon his return from the DL over his last four starts, with a 2.22 ERA and 4.23 FIP, but it's pretty tough to know what the Sox will get from him.

The Sox bullpen is probably the best one in the postseason. Their top five relievers have a collective projected ERA of 3.46 and the highest projected K rate of any of the teams at 8.77.

Overall, this roster and distribution of playing time has the best strikeout rate of all the postseason teams at 8.01 per 9. Their projected walk rate is 3.15 per nine, which is worse than all other teams but the Rockies and Dodgers. HR rate of 0.93 per nine is essentially middle of the pack.

In summary, here's what all that means.

#games 5
home games 2
#outs 125
offense 29.2
pitching 20.8
defense 0.0
wpct .656
162 gm equiv 106-56


#outs: 27 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching and defense for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

As much as it pains me to say it, the Red Sox are at the very least the second best team in the postseason if you penalize the Cardinals for playing in a weaker league. The difference in winning percentage between them and the Yankees is essentially due to home field advantage.

So how about their opposition?

Angels

A lot of analysts are fond of saying the Angels are an 86-90 win team who got lucky and exceeded their Pythagorean record this year. Maybe that's at least somewhat true, but it is irrelevant in the context of this series. Let's see what the team that's going to be playing Boston actually looks like.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
chone figgins 3b 23 .288 .371 .381 .340 .354 .015 3 14 9
bobby abreu rf 22 .284 .379 .440 .362 .366 .004 3 14 -12
torii hunter cf 22 .285 .349 .492 .362 .375 .013 3 14 -3
vladimir guerrero dh 21 .304 .365 .511 .376 .344 -.033 3 13 0
juan rivera lf 21 .275 .320 .462 .336 .348 .012 3 14 8
kendry morales 1b 20 .296 .341 .505 .369 .388 .019 3 13 5
maicer izturis 2b 19 .281 .343 .401 .329 .346 .017 2 12 4
mike napoli c 19 .259 .355 .499 .367 .362 -.005 3 12 -6
erick aybar ss 10 .281 .317 .388 .308 .334 .025 1 7 5
howie kendrick 2b 10 .297 .332 .446 .337 .337 .000 1 7 5
gary matthews jr. lf 4 .257 .330 .401 .323 .315 -.008 0 3 -2
reggie willits lf 2 .261 .351 .322 .310 .213 -.097 0 1 5
jeff mathis c 2 .213 .276 .334 .270 .264 -.006 0 1 -4
robb quinlan lf 1 .263 .310 .374 .303 .271 -.031 0 1 0
total 196 .284 .349 .453 27 128 0


The Angels were third in baseball in team wOBA at .352 (behind the Yankees at .366 and the Red Sox at .352). They were second in runs scored at 883 (behind the Yankees at 915) although that's partially due to a better performance with runners on base. Their context-neutral runs scored would have been around 50 runs less.

It starts at the top with Chone Figgins, who's a very good overall player. In fact, if you factor in defense and baserunning, he was probably the Angels' most valuable player at around 5.7 WAR despite not having much power. Although noted for his defensive versatility, he's essentially settled in at third base and has shown a very good glove, projected around +9 over a full season.

Our old friend Bobby Abreu had a good year offensively as well, slightly better than he'd be expected to do going forward. He gives the Angels a good OBP at the top of the lineup and has been credited with helping the Angels be a little more patient overall as a team. The Angels saw 3.88 pitches per PA in 2009 compared to 3.65 per PA in 2008, which translates to about 9 extra pitches per game. Defensively, Abreu was better than 2008 with the Yanks, but still bad, and he projects pretty bad going forward.

Torii Hunter had a decent year as well on both sides of the ball, although his projection would be for him to do a little worse in both areas.

Let's consider a player who's probably heading to the Hall of Fame. This player bats cleanup for a very good team and has been an MVP. In the postseason, this player has hit .240/.337/.293 in the postseason in his career. Yet, Chip Caray doesn't seem to feel the need to continually recite those stats. That's what Vlad Guerrero has done in the postseason in his career. It doesn't mean he's a bad postseason player or is unclutch, it just means that he's had 86 bad PAs. Just like it means for another former MVP who's probably heading to the Hall of Fame as well. Guerrero's projection may look a little generous given his 2009 performance, but he did hit .300/.347/.498 after returning from the DL on August 4th.

Juan Rivera and Kendry Morales both had solid years as well. Maicer Izturis is really more of a glove man, although he does project to get on base at a better than league average clip. Mike Napoli's low batting average is probably the reason he doesn't get a lot of credit for being one of the better hitting catchers in baseball, but he is. Erick Aybar's another mostly glove guy, and Howie Kendrick should also get some of the playing time at 2B.

Defensively, you have Figgins, Rivera, Morales, Izturis, Aybar and Kendrick as projected plusses, Hunter a little below average, and then Abreu and Napoli as less than great defenders.

And for the pitching...

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
john lackey SP1 192 191 20 55 153 4.23 3.82 3.78 3.83 3.68 12 5.6
jered weaver SP2 185 180 23 57 149 4.13 3.94 4.10 3.75 4.09 6 2.8
scott kazmir SP3 128 115 15 50 128 3.94 3.57 3.87 1.74 2.95 6 2.6
joe saunders SP4 192 211 25 62 105 4.94 4.61 4.76 4.60 5.17 5 2.7
brian fuentes CL 62 53 5 22 58 3.94 3.66 3.52 3.93 4.25 3 1.3
ervin santana SU 72 65 7 24 68 3.91 3.66 3.52 5.03 4.91 3 1.3
darren oliver SU 70 66 7 20 53 3.74 3.54 3.77 2.71 3.21 3 1.2
jason bulger MR 59 48 4 24 66 3.18 3.10 2.97 3.56 3.88 3 1.1
kevin jepsen MR 54 55 3 20 44 4.40 4.08 3.26 4.94 2.96 2 1.0
matt palmer MR 134 156 16 39 72 5.65 5.35 4.51 3.93 4.71 1 0.6
jose arredondo MR 68 74 9 26 52 5.44 5.15 4.47 6.00 4.38 1 0.6
sean o'sullivan LR 119 154 16 21 54 6.84 6.45 4.51 5.92 6.02 0 0.0
Total 45 43 5 15 37 4.18 3.88 3.86 20.9


Lackey gets the nod in Game 1, with Weaver in Game 2 and Kazmir in Game 3. It looks like Ervin Santana will be in the bullpen, so I gave the Game 4 start to Joe Saunders.

Lackey's one of the better pitchers in the league, I had him at 19th in the league in runs saved above replacement level, despite missing 5-6 starts. It could be his last hurrah as an Angel, as he's likely to be the best free agent starting pitcher available in 2010.

Jered Weaver backs up Lackey and he's also a good starter, probably on par with A.J. Burnett as a #2. Although Kazmir's overall 2009 looks ugly, he pitched very well for the Angels after being acquired from Tampa Bay. Looking at all the third starters in the postseason, Kazmir projects better than any of them.

Joe Saunders kind of reminds me of Andy Pettitte. He's going to give up hits and runs, but he'll pitch well enough to keep the Angels in the game most of the time.

The bullpen is going to be interesting to watch. The Angels have almost always had one of the better bullpens in baseball since Mike Scioscia took over, but that's probably not true this year. Brian Fuentes isn't awful, but he's a little shaky and probably not someone you want to see pitching when trying to save a one run lead in Fenway.

The wild card is Ervin Santana. The projection above has been converted to a relief equivalent, but he's got great stuff and could be the Angels' equivalent of Phil Hughes the reliever in the postseason.

The rest of the bullpen isn't too bad, with Darren Oliver, Jason Bulger and Kevin Jepsen around.

So how good are the Angels?

#games 5
home games 3
#outs 125
offense 27.0
pitching 20.9
defense 0.3
wpct .631
162 gm equiv 102-60


They're maybe a hair worse than the Yankees and Boston. So if someone tells you they're an 86 win team that got lucky, tell that person they are wrong.

So you have the equivalent of a 102 win team hosting the equivalent of a 106 win team. What happens if they play each other 10,000 times?

Red Sox 59.2%
Angels 40.8%

Ignore those, they're wrong. These are the correct numbers.

Red Sox: 53.1%
Angels: 46.9%

I don't really care who wins, because I think the Yankees can beat either team and lose to either team, so I'm just going to root for a five game series where each game goes 20 innings.

--Posted at 1:58 pm by SG / 192 Comments | - (217)




Wednesday, October 7, 2009

2009 NLDS Preview: Dodgers vs. Cardinals

Next up, the Dodgers vs. the Cardinals.

Dodgers

The Dodgers had the best record in baseball for many days during 2009, although they tailed off a bit towards the end. Here's their position player breakdown.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
rafael furcal ss 23 .282 .349 .408 .335 .317 -.019 3 15 2
orlando hudson 2b 22 .293 .362 .428 .348 .338 -.010 3 14 -1
manny ramirez lf 22 .303 .418 .549 .417 .411 -.006 4 13 -14
matt kemp cf 21 .301 .355 .493 .365 .362 -.003 3 14 2
james loney 1b 21 .293 .355 .443 .350 .337 -.013 3 14 -2
andre ethier rf 20 .292 .371 .507 .378 .373 -.005 3 13 -2
russell martin c 19 .278 .375 .406 .351 .315 -.036 3 12 -2
casey blake 3b 19 .271 .345 .459 .348 .360 .012 3 12 1
juan pierre cf 10 .297 .340 .378 .319 .333 .014 1 7 3
ronnie belliard 2b 10 .291 .344 .454 .346 .436 .089 1 7 -1
jim thome 1b 5 .253 .372 .476 .368 .374 .005 1 3 0
brad ausmus c 2 .239 .309 .313 .283 .306 .023 0 1 4
juan castro ss 2 .241 .280 .328 .269 .286 .017 0 1 -4
mark loretta 2b 1 .273 .346 .349 .316 .273 -.043 0 1 -2
total 197 .290 .363 .452 28 126 0


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

The Dodgers have a well-balanced offense, with all of their starters projected at better than league average offensively in terms of wOBA. Obviously their key offensive players are Manny Ramirez, Matt Kemp, and Andre Ethier. With Jim Thome on the bench they have a very good pinch-hitting option for situations where the pitcher comes up in a key spot. Juan Pierre and Ronnie Belliard also give them some depth on the bench, although Pierre's best usage is probably as a pinch-runner and defensive replacement.

Defensively, the Dodgers project slightly below average. Manny Ramirez's defensive numbers may overstate how bad he is because we still have years in Fenway LF murking up the numbers. But they don't really have any glaring weaknesses or strengths defensively aside from Manny in LF if he really is a -14 defender.

On the pitching side, the Dodgers will be going with Randy Wolf in game 1, even though Clayton Kershaw projects as their best starter. Kershaw gets the nod in Game 2, with Vicente Padilla (really?) and Chad Billingsley rounding out the rotation.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
randy wolf SP1 164 157 20 56 128 4.37 4.11 4.24 3.23 3.97 12 5.8
clayton kershaw SP2 159 140 13 74 150 4.07 3.91 3.75 2.79 3.16 6 2.7
vicente padilla SP3 147 162 19 52 95 5.61 5.18 4.68 4.92 4.72 6 3.7
chad billingsley SP4 181 168 17 88 162 4.26 3.99 4.06 4.03 3.82 5 2.4
jonathan broxton CL 79 61 5 33 101 3.52 3.13 2.69 2.61 2.03 3 1.2
george sherrill SU 47 40 4 24 47 3.59 3.53 3.85 2.40 3.20 3 1.2
ramon troncoso SU 73 81 4 23 48 4.30 3.93 3.60 2.72 3.57 3 1.4
ronald belisario MR 62 69 8 18 41 5.44 4.92 4.42 2.04 3.36 3 1.8
guillermo mota MR 64 52 5 25 55 3.57 3.44 3.71 3.45 4.30 2 0.8
hong-chih kuo MR 60 54 5 26 63 3.93 3.73 3.49 3.00 3.23 1 0.4
james mcdonald MR 115 120 18 32 87 5.36 4.94 4.54 4.00 4.34 1 0.6
jeff weaver LR 119 137 19 35 77 5.63 5.30 4.88 3.65 3.98 0 0.0
Total 45 43 5 18 38 4.42 4.13 4.02 22.1


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

The Dodgers have a pretty good rotation and a very good bullpen. One area of concern may be the fact that the Dodgers project to have the worst BB rate of any of the playoff teams at 3.50 per 9, but that is at least partially mitigated with the second best HR rate per 9 (0.82) and the third best K rate per 9 (7.80).

Adding that all up looks like this:

#games 5
home games 2
#outs 125
offense 28.0
pitching 22.1
defense -0.5
wpct .606
162 gm equiv 98-64


#outs: 27 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching and defense for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

Cardinals

Before I get to the numbers, I will tease that what I found shocked me.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
julio lugo ss 23 .262 .328 .369 .311 .322 .011 3 15 -8
mark derosa 3b 22 .275 .356 .438 .349 .345 -.003 3 14 -3
albert pujols 1b 22 .339 .448 .646 .460 .459 -.001 5 12 7
matt holliday lf 21 .293 .375 .494 .377 .366 -.011 3 13 5
ryan ludwick rf 21 .278 .347 .501 .363 .334 -.029 3 14 0
skip schumaker 2b 20 .303 .359 .402 .340 .339 -.001 3 13 -7
colby rasmus cf 19 .254 .323 .408 .321 .309 -.012 2 13 10
yadier molina c 19 .286 .345 .385 .325 .335 .009 2 12 8
brendan ryan ss 11 .271 .323 .366 .307 .323 .016 1 7 10
rick ankiel cf 5 .259 .317 .473 .338 .292 -.045 1 3 -4
troy glaus 3b 4 .268 .371 .475 .370 .229 -.140 1 3 -2
jason larue c 3 .213 .294 .340 .284 .274 -.010 0 2 2
joe thurston 2b 2 .276 .337 .401 .326 .291 -.035 0 1 3
tyler greene ss 2 .233 .287 .353 .284 .263 -.021 0 1 -2
total 194 .285 .356 .446 27 125 0


Even if you account for a disparity in talent level between the AL and NL, it's really hard to argue that Albert Pujols is not the best player in baseball. Yeah, Joe Mauer had a great season at 6.9 WAR (using my version of WAR). Pujols? 8.0 WAR.

The midseason additions of Mark DeRosa and Matt Holliday have helped tremendously, and even Julio Lugo played decently although CAIRO is skeptical about that. Colby Rasmus is one of the better prospects in baseball and although his offense was a little disappointing, his defense was very good. Yadier Molina can't hit much, although he's fine for a catcher, but his glove is his calling card and he's probably one of the top two or three defensive catchers in the league.

And lastly, their pitching.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
chris carpenter SP1 132 113 7 29 100 2.98 2.81 3.07 2.24 2.77 12 4.0
adam wainwright SP2 180 177 15 51 144 3.72 3.42 3.52 2.63 3.18 6 2.5
joel pineiro SP3 174 192 17 39 95 4.75 4.41 4.01 3.49 3.27 6 3.2
john smoltz SP4 113 128 12 30 90 4.72 4.49 3.79 8.33 4.83 5 2.6
ryan franklin CL 80 77 8 29 49 3.90 3.71 4.38 1.92 3.36 3 1.3
jason motte SU 56 59 7 15 54 4.36 4.06 3.67 4.76 4.80 3 1.5
dennys reyes SU 46 43 3 19 36 3.57 3.20 3.68 3.29 3.76 3 1.2
kyle mcclellan MR 67 67 5 25 49 4.28 3.99 3.92 3.37 3.98 3 1.4
kyle lohse MR 162 175 17 47 102 4.84 4.51 4.16 4.74 4.58 2 1.1
trever miller MR 48 40 5 16 47 3.59 3.38 3.51 2.06 3.34 1 0.4
todd wellemeyer MR 128 136 16 53 88 5.32 4.85 4.74 5.89 5.34 1 0.6
brad thompson LR 98 108 12 28 48 5.40 5.04 4.69 4.84 4.51 0 0.0
Total 45 44 4 12 33 3.94 3.67 3.65 19.7


You can make a very good argument that no team can match the Cardinals #1/#2 punch. I don't know who will get start in game 4, it will probably be either Smoltz or Lohse, but the difference between their projections is small so it shouldn't change things too much.

The bullpen is a little less impressive if you go by projections instead of by what happened in 2009. Yeah, Ryan Franklin had a great year, but he's Ryan Franklin and he's 36. The odds of him making a real tangible improvement in his talent level to the degree shown in 2009 are small. His FIP in 2009 was 3.22 and his xFIP was 4.23, so he's fine, he's just not 1.92 ERA good. Jason Motte projects better than he actually did in 2009, and they have other useful arms in the pen with Dennys Reyes, Kyle McClellan, Trever Miller and one of Smoltz/Lohse.

So what was so shocking?

#games 5
home games 3
#outs 125
offense 26.9
pitching 19.7
defense 0.4
wpct .658
162 gm equiv 107-55


Before we account for league differences, the Cardinals look to be just about as good as the Yankees, who I have as the best team in the postseason. If we apply a league correction of about 4% (I have the NL as about 4% worse than the AL over the last four seasons) they're more like a .630 Wpct (102 win team).

That doesn't matter until the World Series, so here's what the Monte Carlo Simulator says for Dodgers vs. Cardinals.

Cardinals: 56.7%
Dodgers: 43.3%

--Posted at 2:38 pm by SG / 2 Comments | - (129)



2009 NLDS Preview: Rockies vs. Phillies

Since I have the numbers I used to look at the Twins, Tigers and Yankees for all the playoff teams, I figured I’d throw them up for anyone who’s curious. First up, the Rockies vs. the Phillies.

Phillies

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
jimmy rollins ss 23 .274 .330 .452 .338 .309 -.029 3 15 3
shane victorino cf 22 .291 .352 .437 .346 .350 .004 3 14 -1
chase utley 2b 22 .299 .393 .519 .395 .394 -.001 4 13 11
ryan howard 1b 21 .280 .376 .567 .399 .391 -.008 4 13 0
raul ibanez lf 21 .294 .362 .513 .375 .378 .003 3 13 -5
jayson werth rf 20 .273 .374 .481 .372 .378 .006 3 13 6
pedro feliz 3b 19 .260 .303 .410 .310 .304 -.006 2 13 10
carlos ruiz c 19 .256 .342 .395 .328 .341 .014 2 12 2
greg dobbs 3b 10 .283 .333 .433 .334 .296 -.037 1 7 -3
matt stairs lf 10 .257 .347 .439 .344 .336 -.008 1 7 2
paul bako c 4 .222 .301 .311 .279 .292 .013 0 3 -1
ben francisco cf 1 .258 .326 .424 .328 .330 .002 0 1 -8
eric bruntlett 2b 1 .231 .307 .313 .282 .207 -.075 0 1 -6
miguel cairo 2b 0 .241 .292 .335 .278 .296 .018 0 0 4
total 193 .279 .352 .467 28 125 1


The Phillies have a solid lineup, with Chase Utley as probably their best all around player. In fact, you can make a case that Utley was the second most valuable player in the NL after Albert Pujols. Although they have a fairly minor platoon split this year (.248/.335/.452 vs. LHP compared to .262/.334/.445 vs. RHP), Ryan Howard is very susceptible to lefties with a career split of (.207/.298/.356 vs. LHP compared to .319/.395/.691 vs. RHP). The Rockies have Franklin Morales, Randy Flores and Alan Embree as lefties in the pen, which may help them when faced with Howard in a high leverage situation.

The Phils' defense is a bit above average overa all, with Utley and Pedro Feliz both amongst the best at their positions in baseball.

On the pitching side, the Phils have only announced the Games 1 and 2 starters, Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels. They are planning on having Joe Blanton, J.A. Happ and Pedro Martinez in the pen for Games 1 and 2, so I have no idea who may start games 3 and 4, For now I'll assume it's Blanton and Pedro, with Lee going in Game 5 if necessary.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cliff lee SP1 180 189 16 54 126 4.02 3.75 3.87 3.14 3.30 12 5.4
cole hamels SP2 187 179 24 49 169 4.27 4.00 3.84 4.32 3.74 6 2.8
joe blanton SP3 202 210 25 61 140 4.45 4.24 4.29 4.06 4.43 6 3.0
pedro martinez SP4 93 90 12 31 79 4.60 4.36 4.25 3.62 4.12 5 2.6
brad lidge CL 67 64 9 32 79 5.24 4.77 3.94 7.21 5.30 3 1.7
ryan madson SU 84 86 8 27 71 4.30 4.07 3.76 3.26 3.21 3 1.4
brett myers SU 97 84 10 33 97 3.88 3.67 3.60 4.84 6.07 3 1.3
j.a. happ MR 122 114 13 47 100 3.85 3.72 4.09 2.93 4.34 3 1.3
jack taschner MR 48 54 5 21 38 5.46 5.01 4.31 4.91 5.28 2 1.2
chad durbin MR 109 109 16 44 71 5.27 4.87 5.03 4.39 4.94 1 0.6
scott eyre MR 44 42 5 20 40 4.09 3.79 4.07 1.50 4.63 1 0.5
paul byrd LR 134 159 20 31 64 5.41 4.93 4.87 5.82 5.05 0 0.0
Total 45 45 5 15 37 4.35 4.08 4.01 21.7


Obviously, the big question facing the Phillies is the closer role. Brad Lidge has had a brutal season after having a great one. While his projection is reasonable, there may be a physical reason that he was so bad this year that the projections wouldn't pick up. Ryan Madson and Brett Myers should give them the possibility of dealing with an ineffective Lidge, but their bullpen is probably their biggest Achille's heel right now.

Add it all up, and here's how the Phils look overall.

#games 5
home games 3
#outs 125
offense 27.6
pitching 21.7
defense 0.8
wpct .634
162 gm equiv 103-59


Rockies

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
carlos gonzalez cf 23 .265 .318 .435 .327 .367 .040 3 16 3
seth smith lf 22 .304 .376 .489 .376 .382 .006 3 14 12
todd helton 1b 22 .309 .414 .467 .390 .396 .006 4 13 2
troy tulowitzki ss 21 .291 .367 .483 .369 .393 .024 3 13 3
brad hawpe rf 21 .288 .387 .495 .384 .389 .005 3 13 -18
yorvit torrealba c 20 .267 .323 .387 .313 .323 .010 2 14 0
ian stewart 3b 19 .262 .345 .465 .352 .337 -.014 3 12 4
clint barmes 2b 19 .263 .305 .419 .312 .311 -.001 2 13 4
dexter fowler cf 9 .271 .355 .392 .334 .334 .000 1 6 -9
garrett atkins 3b 9 .288 .355 .444 .350 .293 -.056 1 6 -5
chris iannetta c 4 .265 .375 .464 .368 .347 -.021 1 2 -1
ryan spilborghs rf 2 .288 .360 .436 .350 .308 -.042 0 1 1
omar quintanilla ss 2 .270 .330 .370 .312 .224 -.088 0 1 2
matt murton lf 1 .265 .332 .395 .323 .309 -.014 0 1 7
total 194 .280 .354 .448 27 125 0


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Carlos Gonzalez had a pretty good year in 2009 although his projection thinks he was playing over his head. Seth Smith had a very good year offensively and defensively and deserves to be one of the better candidates in the NL Rookie of the Year balloting. Although he's lost his power, Todd Helton is still probably the best offensive player on the Rockies, and Troy Tulowitzki is also a solid offensive and defensive contributor. Brad Hawpe can hit, but he can't field. Chris Iannetta seems like the better hitting catcher on the roster, but for whatever reason the Rockies seem to prefer playing Yorvit Torrealba.

Defensively, they look to be about a touch above average, with Hawpe canceling out a lot of the good from Smith and the infield.

And the pitching...

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
ubaldo jimenez SP1 193 187 18 83 156 4.98 4.67 4.05 3.47 3.33 12 6.6
aaron cook SP2 194 225 17 43 88 4.98 4.61 4.08 4.16 4.67 6 3.3
jason marquis SP3 196 209 21 79 106 5.38 5.00 4.70 4.04 4.15 6 3.6
jorge de la rosa SP4 151 155 18 62 138 5.29 4.98 4.17 4.38 3.86 5 2.9
huston street CL 65 53 6 19 72 3.56 3.34 3.15 3.06 3.04 3 1.2
rafael betancourt SU 57 50 6 19 53 3.88 3.60 3.82 3.52 3.85 3 1.3
franklin morales SU 106 118 15 41 72 6.30 5.96 4.79 4.50 4.18 3 2.1
matt daley MR 67 74 10 14 49 5.41 5.19 4.32 4.24 3.63 3 1.8
alan embree MR 49 53 6 19 39 5.28 4.93 4.29 5.83 5.26 2 1.2
josh fogg MR 115 124 18 35 64 6.03 5.59 5.00 3.74 5.32 1 0.7
jose contreras MR 151 139 11 63 117 4.60 4.08 3.86 5.41 4.07 1 0.5
randy flores LR 37 43 3 13 30 5.40 4.85 3.86 5.25 3.53 0 0.0
Total 45 46 5 16 33 5.05 4.72 4.17 25.2


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

Obviously the pitching projections are skewed by Coors field, but Ubaldo Jimenez and Aaron Cook are solid at the top. Jason Marquis had a very good year, but it was way out of character from his past history and CAIRO ain't buying it.

Huston Street and Rafael Betancourt are a good closer and setup man combination, but the rest of the pen isn't particularly awe-inspiring.

In summary:

#games 5
home games 2
#outs 125
offense 26.9
pitching 24.8
defense 0.2
wpct .539
162 gm equiv 87-75



#outs: 27 outs times # of games if the series goes the distance.
offense: Total BR for the series using # of outs
pitching: Total runs allowed by the pitching and defense for the series
defense: Estimated impact of defense over series
wpct: Estimated winning percentage for the team based on these playing time estimates and adjusted for home field advantage using the offense, pitching and defense plugged into Pythagenpat
162 gm equiv: wpct translated to a 162 game season

And running the Phils and Rockies through the Monte Carlo Simulator yields the following odds of advancing past the first round.

Phillies: 67.0%
Rockies: 33.0%

Of course anything can happen in a short series.
--Posted at 1:50 pm by SG / 47 Comments | - (143)



How Good Are the 2009 ALDS Version of the Yankees On a Spreadsheet?

Since this is a Yankee site, it's probably time to run the Yankees through the same numbers that I ran the Tigers and Twins through.

The idea here is that using just 2009 data and stats for the entire team doesn't really do a good job of telling how good a team as currently constituted really is. Does it matter that Cody Ransom, Angel Berroa, Chien-Ming Wang and Anthony Claggett combined to be be 51 runs worse than replacement level when trying to assess how good the Yankees are right now? Obviously not, just like it doesn't matter how awful John Smoltz and Brad Penny where when assessing how good the Red Sox are. The same holds for every other team in the postseason. This is why using Pythagorean record or actual winning percentage doesn't really give us that much useful information.

So let's look at the Yankees' postseason roster and their projections and try to figure out how good they really are right now. First up, the position players.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
derek jeter ss 23 .314 .382 .440 .364 .384 .020 3 14 -3
johnny damon lf 22 .282 .357 .453 .354 .369 .015 3 14 0
mark teixeira 1b 22 .292 .386 .542 .397 .402 .005 4 14 4
alex rodriguez 3b 21 .293 .399 .546 .405 .402 -.003 4 13 -4
hideki matsui dh 21 .279 .363 .474 .363 .375 .012 3 13 0
jorge posada c 16 .288 .378 .485 .376 .377 .002 2 10 -6
robinson cano 2b 19 .305 .339 .485 .354 .372 .018 3 13 -1
nick swisher rf 19 .243 .359 .461 .357 .373 .016 3 12 2
melky cabrera cf 10 .270 .328 .394 .318 .328 .010 1 7 0
brett gardner cf 10 .257 .338 .342 .310 .318 .008 1 7 13
eric hinske rf 4 .238 .330 .449 .339 .347 .008 1 3 -1
jose molina c 6 .226 .270 .319 .261 .259 -.001 0 4 1
jerry hairston ss 2 .266 .317 .404 .314 .302 -.012 0 1 -3
ramiro pena ss 1 .240 .287 .304 .267 .306 .039 0 1 5
total 196 .285 .366 .476 29 125 0


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

As you can see from these numbers, just about every Yankee player had better numbers in '09 than they'd be projected to have going forward. That may seem harsh, but it doesn't change the fact that this is a very good team, probably the best team in the postseason right now.

Derek Jeter had an outstanding 2009. Unfortunately, he didn't have an outstanding 2008 and we can't ignore that. Still, he's probably the best leadoff hitter on any of the playoff teams, although you can possibly make a case for Chone Figgins if you squint a little. Jeter even played passable defense this year, and at this point the defensive metrics project him to be just a touch below average. Of course, these metrics were infallible when they showed Jeter at -20, but now that they show him as decent we need to ensure we are aware of their limitations.

Johnny Damon also had a very good 2009, although he hit .215/.319/.278 over his last 92 PAs. A free agent in 2010, Damon's probably auditioning for his next contract, and a good postseason probably earns him a few extra million. His glove and arm in LF have left something to be desired this year, although his projected range is about average. The arm though...

Mark Teixeira had a great year, although he's not really a worth MVP candidate. He's a switch-hitter who has generally had a higher OBP versus lefties and a little more power against righties (.282/.373/.579 career vs. righties and .305/.400/.511 vs. lefties). Despite what 2009 UZR says, Teixeira's glove projects as a slight positive once you factor in past performance.

Until he actually does well in the postseason, the spotlight is going to be on Alex Rodriguez. We know he has the ability to carry the team if he gets hot, and we also know we're going to keep reading about if if he doesn't do well.

Hideki Matsui may be nearing the end of his Yankee career. If so, he had a fine last season and could really punctuate it with a good postseason. Matsui has hit .302/.372/.506 in five postseasons with the Yanks, although he's had a couple of clunkers in there as well.

I guess this is where I'm supposed to flip out about Jose Molina being penciled in to catch A.J. Burnett since it will take Jorge Posada's bat out of the lineup. The thing is, I can't seem to really get that worked up about it. I wouldn't try to deny that there's something to a pitcher-catcher relationship that we can't quantify, and I'd also imagine that Molina would only bat 2-3 times in a game anyway. If you end up with Molina batting in a high-leverage situation after the fifth inning, is there any doubt that he'll be pinch-hit for? Anyway, this paragraph is supposed to be about Jorge Posada. I've adjusted the playing time in the table to assume Molina starts twice. Posada's generally had poor postseasons in his career, but I'm sure fatigue was an issue. He got plenty of rest this year, so despite his advanced age I think he's primed for a good postseason. Maybe the Molina thing will give him an extra kick in the ass too...

Robinson Cano rebounded from a dismal 2008 to have a nice offensive year, although his performance with runners on base was pretty bad. Whether that's due to a change in approach or just due to the vagaries of a selected set of PAs, we don't know. Cano seemed to have a good defensive year, so I'm having trouble reconciling the fact that zone rating and UZR saw him as a touch below average.

Nick Swisher and Melky Cabrera round out the probable starters in RF and CF respectively, then you have the bench of Brett Gardner, Eric Hinske, the aforementioned Molina, Jerry Hairston and probably Freddy Guzman. I gave Gardner 10 PAs but he probably won't start if Girardi wants to keep him as a tactical option for baserunning and as a defensive replacement, but no matter how you allocate the playing time between Gardner and Melky the difference is probably negligible over five games.

The Yankee offense is probably the best one in the postseason once you adjust for park and league. The defense looks around average too, which is very unusual for the Yankees.

So, the pitching...

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
cc sabathia SP1 229 213 20 63 198 3.84 3.44 3.42 3.37 3.38 12 5.1
a.j. burnett SP2 197 186 22 71 185 4.42 4.06 3.84 4.04 4.29 12 5.9
andy pettitte SP3 205 219 21 68 149 4.82 4.35 4.05 4.16 4.19 6 3.2
mariano rivera CL 71 55 5 12 69 2.32 2.18 2.72 1.76 2.94 3 0.8
phil hughes SU 99 95 10 33 86 4.34 4.08 3.70 3.03 3.15 3 1.4
david robertson SU 68 60 5 22 69 3.70 3.43 3.05 3.30 3.09 3 1.2
alfredo aceves MR 140 120 13 22 98 3.91 3.63 3.46 3.54 3.68 2 0.9
joba chamberlain MR 131 114 10 54 146 3.52 3.18 3.16 4.75 4.69 2 0.8
damaso marte MR 43 39 4 19 41 5.02 4.68 3.97 9.47 5.53 1 0.6
phil coke MR 61 63 6 15 46 4.73 4.41 3.62 4.50 4.73 1 0.5
chad gaudin MR 102 104 13 42 79 4.82 4.45 4.54 3.43 5.18 0 0.0
mark melancon LR 62 62 8 8 37 5.11 4.70 3.95 3.87 3.81 0 0.0
Total 45 42 4 14 40 4.08 3.73 3.57 20.4


The assumptions here are that C.C. and A.J. get two starts each, and that Joba Chamberlain is in the bullpen.

The only starting pitcher in the postseason with a better projection than Sabathia is Chris Carpenter, although you can probably make a case that Jon Lester's projection contains data that isn't very relevant to him anymore from when he was fighting cancer. Critics point to the fact that Sabathia has had a bad postseason track record (in a whopping five starts), but I generally weigh 288 starts of good to great quality more than five starts. THat's just me though.

A.J. Burnett is the wild card for the Yankees. He could pitch a gem or he could be torched in any start against any opponent. Let's hope for gems.

Andy Pettitte had a very solid season in 2009 and slots in comfortably in the #3 slot. I thought that pitching him in game 3 on turf was a bad idea, but looking at his three year splits he's actually been better on turf.

As far as the pen. You've got Mo, who continues to excel even though he's lost a tick off his velocity. Phil Hughes was the most effective setup reliever in the American League. David Robertson brings the stuff to get a big strikeout when needed, Alfredo Aceves can come in and give you 3-4 innings if you need it. I have no idea what Joba will do, but we all know about his ability. Note that Hughes and Chamberlain's projections are as relievers. Phil Coke and Damaso Marte give the Yankees a couple of lefties with decent stuff to matchup with, which will be important against Mauer, Kubel and Span. Both are not without flaws though. I threw Chad Gaudin's projection up but didn't give him any innings. He could be very useful out of the pen, especially if spotted against righties.

The Yankee staff has the second best projected strikeout rate of any of the teams in the postseason, just a hair behind Boston (7.96 to 8.05). They have the third best projected walk rate and third best projected HR rate (just look at the Twins post for all the rankings).

So what does all this tell us?

#games 5
home games 3
#outs 125
offense 28.6
pitching 20.4
defense 0.0
wpct .660
162 gm equiv 107-55


Standard disclaimer about the inherent limitations of projections goes here. Player talent can change in ways that objective projection systems won't pick up on, so nothing here is absolute.

The ALDS version of the Yankees looks like a team that would win close to 2/3 of their games. So running the Twins vs. Yankees 10,000 times on my Monte Carlo playoff simulator, I get these ALDS odds:

Yankees: 79.5%
Twins: 20.5%

The Twins can beat the Yankees, and they might. But the odds are pretty long against it.

Update: Yankees.com has the ALDS roster up.
--Posted at 10:11 am by SG / 52 Comments | - (157)




Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Twins or Tigers (Twins Edition)?

Well, we finally know who the Yankees will be seeing in the ALDS this year after one of the best baseball games you'll ever see. The Twins beat the Tigers 6-5 in 12 innings in a game that saw both teams fail to capitalize on numerous scoring chances in extra innings. Anyway, following the format from this post about the Tigers that turned out to be unnecessary, here's a similar look at the Twins as presently constituted.

The same idea here, it's lazy to just use 2009 numbers and pretend that you're doing trenchant analysis of a team. For example, yes, Joe Mauer's very good, but he's probably not a .364 hitter.

So here's a look at the Twins' position players and their updated CAIRO projections based on the 35% 2009, 65% 2006-2008 split I am using right now.

Lineup Pos PA AVG OBP SLG pwOBA 09wOBA Diff BR Outs dRS
denard span cf 23 .305 .365 .397 .327 .357 .030 3 15 -2
orlando cabrera ss 22 .277 .324 .382 .312 .314 .002 2 15 0
joe mauer c 22 .333 .417 .503 .402 .440 .039 4 13 8
jason kubel rf 21 .278 .344 .487 .357 .386 .029 3 14 -7
michael cuddyer 1b 21 .269 .343 .469 .352 .367 .015 3 14 -2
delmon young lf 20 .285 .318 .417 .320 .317 -.003 2 14 -11
brendan harris dh 19 .263 .318 .389 .311 .296 -.015 2 13 0
matt tolbert 3b 19 .245 .301 .343 .286 .265 -.022 2 13 -6
nick punto ss 15 .245 .321 .320 .291 .284 -.007 1 10 6
jose morales c 4 .268 .317 .354 .300 .344 .044 0 3 1
carlos gomez cf 3 .241 .289 .345 .281 .272 -.010 0 2 13
brian buscher 3b 0 .256 .327 .372 .312 .318 .005 0 0 -9
mike redmond c 0 .275 .320 .341 .297 .271 -.026 0 0 2
joe crede 3b 0 .243 .300 .425 .313 .304 -.010 0 0 13
total 189 .278 .339 .412 .329 .339 .009 23 125 0


PA: Estimated plate appearances for the series, assuming it goes the distance.
pwOBA: projected weighted on-base average, a rate version of linear weights
09wOBA: 2009 actual wOBA
Diff: 09wOBA minus pwOBA. As a rough rule of thumb, a difference of .010 in wOBA is worth about five runs over 600 PAs.
BR: Estimated batting runs for the series using linear weights for estimated PA
Outs: Estimated outs for the series based on revised projection and estimated PA
dRS: Defensive projection over 150 games using an average of zone rating and UZR for non-catchers, and for 120 games using a system similar to the one described here for catchers.

Denard Span has a career line of .305/.391/.423 in the majors, so why the mediocre projection? It's because he hit .287/.357/.358 in his minor league career. He's young enough to have tangibly improved from where he's projected, so take that projection with a grain of salt. . Interesting fact, his first name is NOT Denard. It's Keiunta.

Orlando Cabrera came over at the trade deadline in a trade with Oakland, and helped them by getting Alexi Casilla out of the lineup. He hit .292/.316/.424 as a Twin after hitting just .280/.318/.365 for the A's, and at this point in his career he's probably about an average defender.

Obviously, the key to the Twins offense is Joe Mauer. He's by far their best offensive player, and his projection may be underrating him.

Losing Morneau is a big blow to the Twins on paper, but the Twins have averaged 6.35 runs per game since September 13 which was the day after Morneau was lost for the season. While that is very impressive, it's worth noting that it came primarily against Cleveland, Detroit and Kansas City. Jason Kubel has replaced Morneau in the cleanup spot, and Michael Cuddyer has replaced him at first base. Incidentally, Cuddyer's hit .333/ .402/.679 since Morneau has been out.

Delmon Young was once one of the top prospects in baseball, but as you can see his projection and his overall 2009 line is rather unimpressive, and his glove looks like a negative. He's another player who's been tearing it up since Morneau went down, hitting .382/.402/.632. Small sample size blip, or has something finally clicked? It's only 82 PAs, so we probably need to assume it's the former.

I don't know who's going to get the bulk of the DH at bats, so I gave them to Brendan Harris since he had the best offensive projection of the remaining players who weren't penciled into a starting spot. Matt Tolbert and Nick Punto aren't much of an offensive threat on paper.

If you look up and down the 'Diff' column, you can see that several Twins have performed better in 2009 than we'd have expected, but using the distribution of playing time in the table above it would work out to around a .010 difference in collective wOBA between their actual 2009 performance and their revised projections. Over a full season, that's a difference of around 50 runs.

The Twins looked to have a good defense on paper heading into the season, but for whatever reason their team UZR has been really bad at -36. That's 20 runs worse than the Yankees, who aren't exactly the 1985 St. Louis Cardinals. Zone rating likes their defense better than UZR, showing them as +4, but that includes a +6 by Justin Morneau who's no longer part of the equation. Their revised defensive projections have them as a little below average overall, but better than the Yankees by a hair. Over 162 games using the same allocation of playing time, this version of the Twins would project to score around 771 runs and be about 15 runs below average defensively. That's basically an average offensive team.

I'll add the pitching staff when I see the Twins' postseason roster and rotation.

I decided not to wait and am going ahead with the pitching based on the following assumptions:

The Twins have already said Brian Duensing will pitch Game 1 tomorrow. Game 2 would be on Friday and Nick Blackburn would be able to pitch on normal rest so I'm assuming he gets the call there. Scott Baker can pitch game 3 on Sunday on normal rest, then they would probably use Carl Pavano in game 4 on Monday if necessary. If a game 5 (Wednesday) is necessary, Baker Blackburn can pitch again on normal rest.

Pitcher Role IP H HR BB K pRA pERA pFIP 09ERA 09FIP sIP sR
brian duensing SP1 128 158 18 27 62 5.36 5.03 4.43 3.64 4.13 6 3.6
nick blackburn SP2 180 217 22 37 83 4.86 4.40 4.46 4.03 4.43 12 6.5
scott baker SP3 184 191 24 42 137 3.73 3.62 4.09 4.36 4.07 6 2.5
carl pavano SP4 81 97 12 18 52 5.28 4.88 4.31 5.37 4.31 5 2.9
joe nathan CL 69 46 6 19 80 2.26 2.13 2.76 2.15 2.95 3 0.8
matt guerrier SU 78 73 10 22 52 3.65 3.37 4.30 2.26 4.06 3 1.2
jose mijares SU 57 49 7 23 52 3.64 3.46 3.68 2.33 4.01 3 1.2
jon rauch MR 56 54 7 16 48 3.97 3.71 3.60 1.80 3.40 3 1.3
jesse crain MR 55 53 5 21 40 4.64 4.16 4.05 4.65 3.96 2 1.0
jeff manship MR 89 109 11 16 48 5.93 5.56 4.20 5.68 4.94 1 0.7
luis ayala MR 55 61 6 15 35 5.20 4.68 4.22 4.18 4.25 1 0.6
bobby keppel LR 108 143 15 27 43 7.21 6.83 4.98 4.95 4.09 0 0.0
Total 45 49 6 11 30 4.45 4.13 4.24 22.2


pRA: Projected runs allowed per nine innings
pERA: Projected earned runs allowed per nine innings
pFIP: Projected Fielding independent pitching
sIP: Estimated innings in the series
sR: Estimated runs allowed in the series based on revised projection and sIP

The Twins rotation doesn't have a Justin Verlander type who really scares you, but they have some pretty nice balance in the rotation. CAIRO thinks Scott Baker is their best starter, but unless they're willing to go with him on short rest he'll probably only be able to start once if the series goes 5 games. Brian Duensing had a very good year, although based on his prior track record he projects to be worse than he was in 2009. Nick Blackburn is a solid pitcher who projects to be better than league average and is probably the most likely candidate to get two starts, and while Carl Pavano didn't have a good ERA in 2009, he actually had decent peripherals and a very respectable 4.31 FIP.

As far as the pen, the Twins have a closer as good as any closer in the game, and they have quality arms in front of him in Matt Guerrier, Jose Mijares, Jon Rauch and Jesse Crain. Not sure how the back end of the pen will shake out, but it's doubtful that whomever they take will have a ton of impact in this series.

The one thing that pops out at me in these numbers is the control of the Twins pitchers, particularly the starters. Out of the eight playoff teams, the Twins team has the best BB/9 rate using my best guess at postseason rosters and innings allocation at 2.25 per 9. Here's how I have all the teams ranked.

Team BB/9
Twins 2.25
Cardinals 2.59
Yankees 2.84
Angels 2.87
Phillies 2.97
Red Sox 3.19
Rockies 3.23
Dodgers 3.61


The bad news for Twins fans is they have the worst K rate out of those same eight teams.

Team K/9
Red Sox 8.05
Yankees 7.96
Dodgers 7.80
Phillies 7.31
Angels 6.92
Rockies 6.69
Cardinals 6.67
Twins 6.25


More bad news for the Twins.

Team HR/9
Cardinals 0.78
Dodgers 0.82
Yankees 0.83
Red Sox 0.92
Rockies 0.96
Angels 0.98
Phillies 1.04
Twins 1.13


Anyway, if we combine the offense, defense and pitching using these projections and playing time estimates, here's how the Twins look on paper.

#games 5
home games 2
#outs 125
offense 23.5
pitching 22.2
defense -0.4
wpct .512
162 gm equiv 83-79


If the Twins had home field advantage they'd look about two wins better, but they don't, so they don't. That doesn't mean they don't have a fighting chance to beat the Yankees, because they most definitely do.

How much of a chance? I'll tell you tomorrow.
--Posted at 8:53 pm by SG / 49 Comments | - (178)




Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Oakland 9, Texas 1

With Texas losing to Oakland tonight, the Yankees have backed their way into clinching a playoff spot.  Yay, I guess. 

--Posted at 11:31 pm by SG / 5 Comments | - (119)




Monday, September 21, 2009

Is the AL East Rolling Over for the Red Sox?

With the way Baltimore didn't seem to even put up a fight against Boston at home after taking two of three from the Yankees on the road, this question has been coming up a fair bit. Here's a look at some numbers to see if there's anything to it.

I'm just going to look at the plate appearances(hitters) or batters faced(pitchers) and wOBA for each of Baltimore, Tampa and Toronto versus Boston or versus the Yankees. Then I'll calculate the difference in runs given the wOBA splits.

Team Split PA wOBA Diff
Baltimore Boston Red Sox 689 .298 10
New York Yankees 673 .314
Tampa Boston Red Sox 696 .328 -22
New York Yankees 556 .292
Toronto Boston Red Sox 557 .287 14
New York Yankees 729 .317
Total 3


PA/BF: Plate appearances/Batters faced
wOBA: Weighted on base average
Diff: Run difference based on wOBA difference for the team versus Boston or New York

Offensively, both Toronto and Baltimore have been better against the Yankees, although Tampa Bay's been much worse, which essentially evens it out. Of course, the fact is that Tampa Bay is a better team than either Toronto or Baltimore so it's pretty freaking annoying that the Yankees can't handle them as well as Boston has.

And on the pitching side:

Team Split BF wOBA Diff
Baltimore Boston Red Sox 758 .392 -17
New York Yankees 715 .366
Tampa Boston Red Sox 693 .323 11
New York Yankees 577 .340
Toronto Boston Red Sox 567 .337 6
New York Yankees 726 .350
Total 0


Team Split ERA FIP
Baltimore Boston Red Sox 6.87 5.96
New York Yankees 6.72 6.23
Tampa Boston Red Sox 4.41 4.81
New York Yankees 5.25 5.76
Toronto Boston Red Sox 4.67 5.15
New York Yankees 5.28 5.22


These numbers are in terms of how the opponent has done against the pitching, so a higher wOBA means the pitching has been worse. Baltimore's again been awful against Boston pitching-wise, 17 runs worse than against the Yankees. Toronto and Tampa Bay both have higher wOBAs against the Yankees, but the difference in PAs means the run values are so far tilted towards the Yankees. That could change based on how the rest of the season plays out.

The fact that all three AL East teams have higher wOBAs against the Yankees could point to Boston having a better pitching staff, but the Yankees have held opposing teams to a wOBA of .311 compared to Boston's .314. Once you adjust for park, they are essentially even, so that's not it.

In total, the AL East isn't really rolling over for Boston, but you can make a case that Baltimore is. Jerks.
--Posted at 5:08 pm by SG / 25 Comments | - (127)




Sunday, August 30, 2009

MLB Monte Carlo Playoff Odds As Of August 30, 2009

It's been about two weeks since I last posted these, so here's an update through today's games (sans Atlanta vs. Philadelphia).
Last Upate 8/30/2009
Iterations 10,000
Team W 1 Std RS RA TmStr Div WC PL Max Min G/L
Yankees 101.0 95-107 887 737 .604 94.3% 5.5% 99.8% 111 90 0.5%
Cardinals 94.2 89-100 745 685 .564 99.4% 0.2% 99.6% 104 86 14.8%
Dodgers 97.2 92-103 793 678 .585 94.8% 4.3% 99.1% 105 87 4.0%
Phillies 95.5 90-101 830 744 .594 98.0% 1.1% 99.1% 104 86 8.9%
Angels 95.1 89-101 851 776 .561 91.2% 1.4% 92.6% 104 86 -1.2%
Red Sox 94.8 89-101 849 716 .592 5.7% 85.1% 90.8% 104 86 21.0%
Tigers 87.5 82-93 762 748 .537 89.5% 0.0% 89.5% 99 79 15.4%
Rockies 89.2 84-95 803 769 .531 2.9% 44.3% 47.2% 98 80 0.2%
Giants 88.4 83-94 684 669 .538 2.4% 33.2% 35.6% 97 80 13.3%
Rangers 88.9 83-95 779 791 .518 8.7% 4.3% 13.0% 99 80 -11.5%
Braves 86.2 81-92 762 692 .539 1.7% 10.4% 12.1% 96 78 -4.6%
Twins 81.6 76-87 776 781 .509 8.5% 0.0% 8.5% 92 73 0.1%
Marlins 84.6 79-90 750 794 .523 0.4% 4.0% 4.3% 93 76 -14.8%
Rays 87.3 82-93 814 714 .553 0.0% 3.9% 3.9% 95 79 -7.6%
Cubs 83.6 78-89 768 703 .530 0.7% 2.4% 3.0% 92 74 -19.8%
White Sox 79.0 73-85 746 788 .490 1.8% 0.0% 1.8% 89 69 -15.9%
Indians 73.1 67-79 808 802 .469 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 84 66 0.1%
Mariners 82.9 77-89 680 722 .502 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 90 73 -0.9%
Astros 76.0 70-82 700 793 .452 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 85 66 0.0%
Athletics 72.0 66-78 742 766 .467 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 81 62 0.0%
Blue Jays 73.8 68-79 800 800 .500 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 83 65 -0.1%
Brewers 78.4 73-84 783 794 .493 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 88 69 -2.0%
Diamondbacks 73.2 68-79 737 743 .482 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 83 65 0.0%
Mets 73.1 67-79 757 761 .462 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 82 63 0.0%
Nationals 57.5 52-63 751 862 .395 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 68 49 0.0%
Orioles 66.2 61-72 768 849 .438 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75 57 0.0%
Padres 68.3 63-74 672 794 .412 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 76 59 0.0%
Pirates 67.5 62-73 696 794 .430 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 78 59 0.0%
Reds 71.5 66-77 690 769 .449 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 79 62 0.0%
Royals 62.1 56-68 694 817 .412 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 71 53 0.0%


W: Projected wins
1 Std: Win range within one standard deviation
RS: Projected runs scored
RA: Projected runs allowed
TmStr: Team strength (estimated using 1/3 YTD WPCT, 1/3 YTD Pythagenpat, 1/3 2009 Projection)
Div: Division title percentage
WC: Wild card percentage
PL: Div + WC
G/L: Gain/loss. Current playoff percentage minus playoff percentage on August 15. Greater than zero means improved playoff odds, less than zero means playoff odds have dropped.

The Yankees were already in very good shape for making the playoffs, but their odds moved up by a touch. The Monte Carlo simulations see the Yankees floor as 90 wins now, with a high of 111. That'd be sweet.

The biggest gainer over the last two weeks has been the Red Sox actually, who are playing well aside from when they play the Yankees. Since August 16, Boston is 9-2 and has scored 69 runs while allowing 44 against everyone but the Yankees. Against the Yankees, they went 1-2 and scored 29 runs while allowing 29. Overall, they're 10-4 since August 15. Their chances also have gone up thanks to the Rays going 8-5 and the Rangers going 7-7 (despite taking 2 of 3 from Boston).

Other big gainers are the Tigers who've moved from an 86.5 win pace to an 87.5 win pace while the White Sox went from an 81.7 win pace to a 79.0 win pace and saw their playoff chances drop by around 16%.. The Twins have now moved past the White Sox as the second most likely team to take the AL Central, although the odds are against them.

Not much really changed in the AL West, with the Angels continuing to run away with the division.

Over in the JV league, the Cardinals and Giants were the biggest gainers of the last two weeks. The Cardinals now have the best odds of any team to take their division. The NL wild card race is shaping up as an interesting one with less than one game separating the Giants and Rockies according to these simulations after the Giants swept Colorado this weekend. They have three more games against each other in mid-September. Meanwhile, the Marlins and Cubs have essentially dropped out of playoff contention at this point,
--Posted at 7:43 pm by SG / 6 Comments | - (154)




Saturday, August 22, 2009

2009 Yankee Splits vs. Boston Through the First 13 Games

Yankees' offense vs. Boston
Split PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
First 8 games 329 288 31 77 14 0 10 29 33 67 9 0 .267 .343 .420 .764
Last 5 games 232 203 45 69 16 1 11 45 26 33 1 1 .340 .414 .591 1.005
Total 561 491 76 146 30 1 21 74 59 100 10 1 .297 .373 .491 .863


Yankees' pitching vs. Boston
Split IP H R ER HR HBP BB SO ERA FIP BF AVG OBP SLG OPS
First 8 games 68.3 78 55 46 13 9 48 65 6.06 6.27 334 .287 .404 .515 .919
Last 5 games 51.0 37 19 17 5 3 30 46 3.00 4.61 217 .204 .323 .320 .643
Total 119.3 115 74 63 18 12 78 111 4.75 5.56 551 .254 .372 .437 .809


--Posted at 9:29 am by SG / 27 Comments | - (165)




Friday, August 21, 2009

Behind Enemy Lines

For the better half of the 2009 MLB season I have been covering games for STATS Inc.  I mainly enter game data off the broadcasts and occasionally analyze specific pitch data when called upon.
In June, STATS had an opening for a live press box reporter.  They asked me if I would be interested.  I don’t need to tell you my response.  It turned out that the offer was somewhat bittersweet, however.  The only opening they had at the time was at Fenway.  I took it without hesitation. 
I had only been to Fenway once in my life.  My 15 year old Connecticut All-Star team had made the regionals in Pittsfield, MA in the Summer of 1995.  Our success was mainly due to Craig Breslow’s left arm and my uncanny ability to bunt.  Our gracious Massachusetts hosts awarded every team with a trip to Fenway at the end of the Summer.  On September 3rd, Tim Wakefield pitched 8 strong innings of 4-hit ball to beat the California Angels 8-1.  I was indifferent.  I was more concerned with eying the scoreboard, as the Yankees were blowing an 8-5 lead against the A’s in the Bronx (a game they would eventually lose 10-9 in 10 innings with Eckersley getting the win).

My first game as a press box reporter came on Sunday, June 20th this year, between the Braves and the Red Sox.  And who else should be the starting pitcher for the Red Sox but Tim Wakefield.  That’s right, my second game ever at Fenway, 14 years after my first, and the same guy is toeing the mound.  Somehow Nick Green would manage a walk-off HR in the ninth to win the game for Boston.

I’d be lying if I said this wasn’t the best opportunity I’ve ever had.  That may sound kind of sad.  But, I really do appreciate every game I get to cover (even if I have to suffer through “Dirty Water” after the last out).  And two months after my first game, the powers that be finally saw fit to assign me a Yankees-Red Sox game.  I have been planning to make the most of this opportunity, particularly by posting to RLYW things I think some of you all might find interesting.  When the Yankees take BP, I’ll try and go down and snap a shot or two, or even get some audio to post.  I hope I can bring you something worthwhile.

Stay tuned.

--Posted at 3:00 pm by Jonathan / 23 Comments | - (96)



Postseason Odds Implications of this Weekend’s Yankees/Red Sox Series

Using my aforementioned Monte Carlo simulator and running 10,000 iterations of each scenario:

If the Red Sox xweep
Yankees: 92.0% Div, 7.2% WC, 99.2% PL
Red Sox: 6.9% Div, 62.0% WC, 68.9% PL

If the Red Sox take two of three
Yankees: 94.7% Div, 4.5% WC, 99.2% PL
Red Sox: 4.9% Div, 64.2% WC, 69.1% PL

If the Yankees take two of three
Yankees: 96.0%Div, 3.8%WC, 99.9%PL
Red Sox: 3.9%Div, 66.6%WC, 70.5%PL

If the Yankees sweep
Yankees: 98.6% Div, 1.4% WC, 100.0% PL
Red Sox: 1.3% Div, 66.5% WC, 67.8% PL

Div: Odds of winning the AL East
WC: Odds of winning the wild card
PL: Odds of making the postseason (Div + PL)

--Posted at 2:45 pm by SG / 13 Comments | - (126)



The Importance of The Upcoming Boston Series, Part Deux

About two weeks ago, I looked at the Yankees/Red Sox series using revised projections and pitching matchups to predict that the Yankees would win 2.3 of the 4 scheduled games. Of course the Yankees ended up sweeping Boston to open up a commanding lead in the AL East.

At this point, up by six games in the loss column with 41 games to play, the division is the Yankees' to lose. If The Yankees go 21-20, they end the season at 97-75, and Boston would have to go 28-14 to tie them. However, if the Red Sox are able to sweep this series, their task becomes a lot easier.

Realistically, as long as the Yankees win one of the three games, they should be in good shape over the rest of the season, but let's see how the games break down. I'm going to use the best starting lineups for both teams, as well as the top relievers, even though we know bench players and lesser relievers will likely see some time as well.

Lineup PA AVG OBP SLG BR Outs
derek jeter 5 .316 .381 .446 .732 3
johnny damon 5 .283 .358 .470 .743 3
mark teixeira 5 .287 .384 .541 .862 3
alex rodriguez 5 .281 .395 .531 .871 3
hideki matsui 5 .275 .361 .476 .732 3
jorge posada 5 .282 .367 .477 .751 3
robinson cano 5 .304 .338 .481 .632 3
nick swisher 4 .242 .360 .457 .569 3
melky cabrera 4 .268 .326 .399 .464 3
total 43 .282 .363 .475 6.4 27


Lineup PA AVG OBP SLG BR Outs
jacoby ellsbury 5 .299 .349 .416 .679 3
dustin pedroia 5 .304 .369 .453 .730 3
victor martinez 5 .298 .374 .462 .737 3
kevin youkilis 5 .297 .401 .519 .852 3
jason bay 5 .270 .379 .516 .762 3
david ortiz 5 .261 .367 .518 .801 3
mike lowell 5 .285 .339 .473 .686 3
j.d. drew 4 .264 .378 .462 .592 2
alex gonzalez 4 .268 .316 .409 .461 3
total 43 .283 .364 .470 6.3 27


The lineups are essentially the same, with the Yankee lineup projected to score around 6.4 runs per 27 outs and the Red Sox lineup projected to score around 6.3. Now onto the pitching matchups.

Friday, August 21: Pettitte vs. Penny
Pitchers IP R
andy pettitte 6.00 3.23
mariano rivera 1.00 0.27
phil hughes 1.00 0.52
phil coke 1.00 0.68
total 9.00 4.69


Pitchers IP R
brad penny 5.50 3.28
jonathan papelbon 1.00 0.31
hideki okajima 1.00 0.35
manny delcarmen 1.00 0.46
ramon ramirez 0.50 0.37
total 9.00 4.77


I won't run through all the math, you can go to the linked post in the beginning if you want to see how it works, but thanks to the home field advantage, Boston rates as a slight favorite in this game, as the Yankees' probability to win this game is 46.9%.

Saturday, August 22: Burnett vs. Tazawa
I didn't have Tazawa projected this year, so I'm using his MLE and his MLB performance as his projection.

Pitchers IP R
a.j. burnett 6.40 3.12
mariano rivera 1.00 0.27
phil hughes 1.00 0.52
david robertson 0.60 0.24
total 9.00 4.15


Pitchers IP R
junichi tazawa 5.00 2.70
jonathan papelbon 1.00 0.31
hideki okajima 1.00 0.35
manny delcarmen 1.00 0.46
ramon ramirez 1.00 0.73
total 9.00 4.56


The Yankees rate as slight favorites in this win, as their win probability is 50.3%.

Sunday, August 23: Sabathia vs. The Guardian of Playing the Game the Right Way
Pitchers IP R
cc sabathia 6.90 2.96
mariano rivera 1.00 0.27
phil hughes 1.00 0.52
david robertson 0.10 0.04
total 9.00 3.79


Pitchers IP R
josh beckett 6.80 3.26
jonathan papelbon 1.00 0.31
hideki okajima 1.00 0.35
manny delcarmen 0.20 0.09
total 9.00 4.02


Another close one, with the Yankees as very slight underdogs with a win probability of 48.2%.

Regardless of the win probabilities, I think the Yankees should be able to take one of the first two games, and they have a decent chance of taking both. The Sunday game is a tossup, as both pitchers are capable of shutting down the other team.

Now, bear in mind that I have it on good authority that you CAN'T PREDICT BASEBALL. So I have no idea what will actually happen.
--Posted at 12:34 am by SG / 89 Comments | - (150)




Thursday, August 6, 2009

The Importance of This Red Sox Series

You may or may not be aware that there’s a somewhat important series coming up between the Yankees and the Red Sox.  After a 5-4 road trip where the Yankees were able to maintain a 2.5 game lead, here’s a look at how things stand.

Yankees: 65-42, 58.7% Div, 29.4% WC, 88.1% PL (chances at winning division, wild card, and making playoffs respectively)
Red Sox: 62-44, 36.7% Div, 41.4% WC, 78.1% PL

So let’s run through the possible outcomes:

Red Sox sweep
Yankees: 65-46, 31.4% Div, 45.4% WC, 76.8% PL
Red Sox: 66-44, 62.1% Div, 28.0% WC, 90.0% PL
Me breaking lots of stuff.

Red Sox take three of four
Yankees: 66-45, 43.4% Div, 42.5% WC, 85.9% PL
Red Sox: 65-45, 50.2% Div, 38.1% WC, 88.4% PL
Me breaking a fair amount of stuff.

Red Sox and Yankees split four
Yankees: 67-44, 60.7% Div, 30.3% WC, 91.0% PL
Red Sox: 64-46, 33.6% Div, 48.1% WC, 81.6% PL
Me breaking a thing or two.

Yankees take three of four
Yankees: 68-43, 69.4% Div, 24.8% WC, 94.2% PL
Red Sox: 63-47, 25.5% Div, 51.4% WC, 76.9% PL
Me slightly happy.

Yankees sweep
Yankees: 69-42, 80.2% Div, 15.9% WC, 96.1% PL
Red Sox: 62-48, 15.6% Div, 53.4% WC, 69.0% PL
Me very happy.

The Yankees realistically don’t have to win this series to remain solidly in the playoff hunt.  Even if they get swept, their playoff odds still look to be around 77%.  Split, and they are better off than they were entering the series.

However, after dropping eight of eight to a team that I’m very comfortable is no better than them, I think they need to win this series just to shut some people up. 

--Posted at 9:06 am by SG / 58 Comments | - (145)




Monday, August 3, 2009

Guarantee Revealed

Back on April 27, I made the following proclamation.

My bold prediction: The Yankees will beat the Red Sox at least once this season. Book it.


The Yanks had dropped their third straight game against Boston in 2009 at that point. Of course, they've since lost another five games, and are winless in eight games. If we assume the two teams are essentially equal talent-wise, the odds of that happening are around one in 250.

Anyway, since we're all getting antsy about the Yankees ever beating Boston, I figured I should take my guarantee one step further and reveal the game the Yankees will win. I've decided it will be part of the upcoming four game series at home.

I could have just done this using POOMA, but I think it's better if I go about it empirically. So the first thing I did was re-project the starting lineups for both teams going forward, then figured out how many runs per game we would expect each lineup to score in an average game based on these new projections.

Lineup PA AVG OBP SLG BR Outs
jacoby ellsbury 5 .294 .343 .414 0.7 3
dustin pedroia 5 .306 .366 .448 0.7 3
victor martinez 5 .285 .364 .450 0.7 3
kevin youkilis 5 .291 .394 .515 0.8 3
david ortiz 5 .265 .367 .508 0.8 3
jason bay 5 .265 .366 .490 0.8 3
j.d. drew 5 .264 .375 .458 0.7 3
jason varitek 4 .234 .336 .421 0.5 2
nick green 4 .246 .285 .391 0.3 3
total 42 .272 .355 .455 6.0 27


I'm giving the Red Sox their best possible offensive lineup here, which means sitting Mike Lowell for Victor Martinez and Jed Lowrie for Nick Green. That lineup projects to score around 6.0 runs per game.

Lineup PA AVG OBP SLG BR Outs
derek jeter 5 .308 .378 .430 0.7 3
johnny damon 5 .280 .357 .460 0.7 3
mark teixeira 5 .285 .383 .532 0.8 3
alex rodriguez 5 .273 .393 .540 0.9 3
hideki matsui 5 .268 .359 .468 0.7 3
jorge posada 5 .280 .369 .485 0.8 3
robinson cano 5 .303 .340 .473 0.7 3
nick swisher 4 .240 .361 .452 0.6 3
melky cabrera 4 .276 .334 .407 0.4 2
total 43 .279 .364 .472 6.3 27


This version of the Yankee lineup looks to be a touch better than the Red Sox's over 27 outs, at 6.3 runs per game. And yes, I'm aware that the starters won't play all four games for both teams, but this is all hypothetical anyway.

The Yankee defense has actually been better than Boston's this year, according to both ZR and UZR. However, I've incorporated the defense into the pitching projections that follow so I won't treat it separately here.

The next thing to do is estimate runs allowed per game by the pitching staff. The assumption here is that each starter will pitch around their average innings pitched per start in 2009 while allowing their re-projected runs allowed pro-rated to those innings. Remaining innings to get to nine will be filled by the top relievers on the team, using one inning for closer, one inning for setup man, then remaining innings to be adjusted accordingly. Obviously, the top relievers won't pitch in every game, but they should pitch in any game with a lead. Since I'm trying to figure out the probabilities of winning each game, I'll stick with the top relievers exclusively.

Thursday, August 5: Smoltz vs. Chamberlain
Pitchers IP R
john smoltz 5.2 2.66
manny delcarmen 0.8 0.34
takashi saito 1 0.34
hideki okajima 1 0.40
jonathan papelbon 1 0.32
total 9 4.06


And yes, I'm aware that pitchers can't pitch 5.2 innings or 0.8 innings, but innings have to add up to exactly 9 so that's how I made it work.

Pitchers IP R
joba chamberlain 5.5 2.35
mariano rivera 1 0.30
phil hughes 1 0.42
alfredo aceves 1 0.43
phil coke 0.5 0.23
total 9 3.73


Since we now have an estimate for runs scored per game and runs allowed per game for both teams, we can use Pythagenpat to calculate an estimated winning percentage, then use log5 to estimate the probability of each team winning that game.

For the Red Sox, that means their Pythagenpat exponent for this game is (6.0 + 4.06)^.287 = 1.94, and their estimated winning percentage is 6.00 ^ 1.94 divided by (6.00 ^ 1.94 + 4.06 ^ 1.94) = .681. For the Yankees, their Pythagenpat exponent for this game is (6.3 + 3.73)^.287 = 1.94, and their estimated winning percentage is 6.3 ^ 1.94 divided by (6.4 ^1.94 + 3.73 ^ 1.94) = .734. Before factoring in homefield advantage (+ 0.02 to home team winning percentage, - 0.02 to road team), that means the Yankees should have a 55.3% probability of winning this game. Add in homefield and the probability would go to 59.3%.

Friday, August 6: Beckett vs. Burnett
Pitchers IP R
josh beckett 6.8 3.10
hideki okajima 1 0.40
jonathan papelbon 1.2 0.39
total 9 3.88


Pitchers IP R
a.j. burnett 6.3 2.95
mariano rivera 1 0.30
phil hughes 1 0.42
phil coke 0.7 0.33
total 9 4.00


As fascinating as the detailed breakdown of the math involved surely is, I'll just put the estimated winning percentages here.
Yankees: .510, .550 HFA

Saturday, August 7: Buchholz vs. Sabathia
Pitchers IP R
clay buchholz 5.1 2.70
hideki okajima 1 0.40
jonathan papelbon 1 0.32
manny delcarmen 1 0.42
takashi saito 0.9 0.31
total 9 4.15


Pitchers IP R
c.c. sabathia 6.7 2.72
mariano rivera 1 0.30
phil hughes 1 0.42
phil coke 0.3 0.14
total 9 3.58


Yankees: .577, .617 HFA

Sunday, August 9: Lester vs. Pettitte
Pitchers IP R
jon lester 6.3 3.10
hideki okajima 1 0.40
jonathan papelbon 1 0.32
manny delcarmen 0.7 0.29
total 9 4.12


Pitchers IP R
andy pettitte 6 3.22
mariano rivera 1 0.30
phil hughes 1 0.42
phil coke 1 0.47
total 9 4.41


Yankees: .494, .534 HFA

So overall, here's what the numbers say.

Game % %HFA
Sat, Aug 8 - Sabathia vs. Buchholz .577 .617
Thu, Aug 6 - Smoltz vs. Chamberlain .553 .593
Fri, Aug 7 - Beckett vs. Burnett .510 .550
Sun, Aug 9 - Lester vs. Pettitte .494 .534
Total 2.134 2.294


Good news, as the Yankees should win 2.3 games against Boston over the weekend.

Looking at these numbers, I'm therefore going to guarantee that the Yankees win the game on Saturday August 8, with the caveat that you can't predict baseball.
--Posted at 8:39 am by SG / 95 Comments | - (147)




Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Yankees.com: Amazing Joba mows down Rays

ST. PETERSBURG—Joba Chamberlain took his new attitude on the road and kept the results coming, hurling eight strong innings, as the Yankees defeated the Rays, 6-2, on Wednesday at Tropicana Field.

Chamberlain returned for the second half refreshed, vowing to bid farewell to his earlier starting troubles. For a third consecutive start, he kept his word, continuing to mow down opposing lineups and turning in his best effort so far.

The 23-year-old right-hander limited Tampa Bay to just three hits in the contest, facing the minimum through the first four frames. Chamberlain walked two and struck out five, improving to 3-0 with an 0.83 ERA since he spent four days relaxing in his Nebraska backyard during the All-Star break.

Joba’s obviously the big story out of tonight’s game.  Since the All Star Break, he’s put up an 0.83 ERA over three starts and 21.2 innings.  He’s allowed 8 hits and has held opposing batters to a line of .114/.222/.200.  He’s got a component ERA of 1.38.  His FIP is 3.43, which is still very respectable, even if it it’s a bit higher than his ERA and CERA. 

I sometimes overstate the importance of games, but this series was very important.  The Yankees have now put the Rays in a position where they have to be eight games better than the Yanks over 60 odd games to catch them.  Even if you believe the Rays are better than the Yankees (and most current evidence indicates that’s NOT the case), it’s pretty hard to make a case that they would be 21 games better over a full season, which is what they’d have to be over the rest of the season to catch the Yankees.

With Oakland taking two of three from Boston while the Yankees were taking two of three from Tampa Bay, the Yankees gained another game in the AL East lead.  That they did it on the road against one of the better teams in baseball while Boston was playing one of the worst teams in baseball at home makes it even more critical.  While the division race is far from over, the statistical outcome that should have been expected over the last three days would be Boston gaining a game.  Further proof that you just can’t predict baseball.

So yeah, even though Chien-Ming Wang is done for the year, and even though Brian Bruney continues to disappoint, and even though Alfredo Aceves is fatigued, things are going pretty well.

--Posted at 9:34 pm by SG / 119 Comments | - (181)




Monday, July 27, 2009

The Importance of This Tampa Bay Series

I was fiddling around with the standings to see how important this next series against Tampa Bay was.  Coming off their 9-1 home stand, the Yankees are 60-38 and lead Tampa Bay (54-45) by 6.5 games.  Here are the four scenarios:

Tampa Bay sweep
Yankees: 60-41
Rays: 57-45, 3.5 GB

Tampa Bay takes two of three
Yankees: 61-40
Rays: 56-46, 5.5 GB

Yankees take two of three
Yankees: 62-39
Rays: 55-47, 7.5 GB

Yankees sweep
Yankees: 63-38
Rays: 54-48, 9.5 GB

If the Yankees can take two of three then go 31-30 over their final 60 games of the season, the Rays would have to go 38-22 (.633 WPCT) over their final 60 games to catch them.  That’s the equivalent to a 103 win pace.  If the Yankees sweep, the Rays would have to go 40-20 (.666 WPCT / 108 win pace) to catch a 31-30 Yankee team.

Log5 would tell us the Rays should take two out of three, but if the Yankees can improve on that, they’ll be setting themselves up really nicely for the rest of the season.

Matchups for the series are:

Monday July 27
NYY: A.J. Burnett, RHP (9-4, 3.74) vs. TB: James Shields, RHP (6-6, 3.70)

Tuesday July 28
NYY: CC Sabathia, LHP (10-6, 3.67) vs. TB: Scott Kazmir, LHP (4-6, 6.69)

Wednesday, July 29
NYY: Joba Chamberlain, RHP (6-2, 3.86) vs. TB: Matt Garza, RHP (7-7, 3.68)

Since a wise man once said ‘You can’t predict baseball’, I won’t try.  In fact, I may throw all my stats into the East River.  But I will say that the first and third matchups look like they’re basically tossups, and the middle matchup seems like the key one for the Yankees, although we know Kazmir is better than he’s pitched so far this year.

Update: Part 2 of Chris Jaffe’s look at the best teams to never win a World Series is posted at the Hardball Times for anyone who may be interested.

--Posted at 1:29 am by SG / 77 Comments | - (144)




Monday, July 20, 2009

Remaining Strength of Schedule for Boston, Tampa Bay and the Yankees

I was curious about the remaining strength of schedule for the big three in the AL East to see if it would impact what looks to be a tight race for the division and wild card, so I played around with Bill James's log5 to see if I could estimate it. Regular readers are probably familiear with log5, but if you're not there's a good synopsis of it here.

Although the original formula is a little more involved, it can essentially be reduced to winning percentage = .500 + A - B (where A is the estimated WPCT of one team, and B is the estimated WPCT of the other team). This assumes the teams are in the .400 to .600 area, which is generally true in 2009 MLB aside from Cleveland and Washington.

So, I looked at the strength of schedule using a few different ways of estimating team true talent. I'm looking at games from July 20th forward. Team winning percentages are adjusted for home field advantage (add .02 to WPCT for the home team, subtract .02 from WPCT for the road team). 2009 projection data is adjusted for roster changes, but projections themselves were not revised.

2009 WPCT(33.3%), 2009 PythagenPat WPCT(33.3%), 2009 Project WPCT(33.3%)
Team GR HGR Opp W% log5 W Final W
Yankees 71 36 .512 40.8 94.8
Red Sox 71 36 .512 41.7 96.7
Rays 70 36 .521 38.6 89.6


GR: Games remaining
HGR: Home games remaining
Opp W%: Estimated winning percentage of remaining opponents, adjusted for home field advantage
log 5 W: Estimated log 5 wins over remainder of season
Final W: Final estimated wins (YTD wins + log5 W)

2009 WPCT(25.0%), 2009 PythagenPat WPCT(25.0%), 2009 Project WPCT(50.0%)
Team GR HGR Opp W% log5 W Final W
Yankees 71 36 .511 41.1 95.1
Red Sox 71 36 .511 41.6 96.6
Rays 70 36 .518 38.7 89.7


2009 PythagenPat WPCT(100.0%)
Team GR HGR Opp W% log5 W Final W
Yankees 71 36 .516 39.1 93.1
Red Sox 71 36 .516 41.3 96.3
Rays 70 36 .525 39.7 90.7


2009 WPCT(50.0%), 2009 PythagenPat WPCT(50.0%)
Team GR HGR Opp W% log5 W Final W
Yankees 71 36 .514 40.1 94.1
Red Sox 71 36 .514 41.9 96.9
Rays 70 36 .528 38.5 89.5


No matter which methodology you look at, the numbers say the Yankees and Red Sox essentially have the same schedule going forward, with Tampa's schedule about one game harder. Realistically, what this tells me is that head-to-head matchups are probably going to be the determining factor going forward.

On an unrelated note, Chris Jaffe from The Hardball Times asked me to help out with an article he wanted to write about the best teams to never win a World Series. Part 1 is up for anyone who may want to check it out.

--Posted at 11:22 am by SG / 37 Comments | - (196)




Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Yankees.com: Burnett no help as Yankees fall into tie

Burnett allowed five runs (three earned) in just 2 2/3 innings and suffered his first career defeat against Boston, dropping a 7-0 decision on Tuesday at Fenway Park.

“It’s disappointing to everybody,” Burnett said. “I think the toughest thing is you come out of a game like that and you’ve got to look all of those guys in the face when you come in. That’s a feeling you don’t want to have.”

The loss was the Yankees’ sixth in six games this season against the Red Sox, giving both teams even records at 34-24 and equal shares of first place in the American League East with two games remaining in this midweek rivalry series.

Was it really too much to ask Burnett to keep the Yankees in the game for at least 3 innings?  Then again, I guess it was too much to ask the Yankee offense to muster more than 2 hits all night.

Also, the Yankees took Slade Heathcott with their 29th pick overall in the draft.

--Posted at 12:56 am by Jonathan / 39 Comments | - (117)




Monday, June 8, 2009

MLB.com: Yankees power up, pound Rays

NEW YORK—Shipping up to Boston to renew their most intense rivalry, the Yankees left town in style, hitting four home runs to power a 5-3 victory over the Rays on Monday at Yankee Stadium.

Tampa Bay starter Andy Sonnanstine served up all four of the round-trippers. Johnny Damon’s solo blast put the Yankees ahead in the sixth inning after Mark Teixeira hit a solo shot in the first inning and Nick Swisher clubbed a two-run shot in the second.

Now they will only be two games back of first going into the weekend.

--Posted at 9:10 pm by Jonathan / 128 Comments | - (166)




Sunday, June 7, 2009

MLB.com: Yankees rally past Rays in eighth

Trailing by two runs to begin the inning, the Yankees rallied to score three off a beleaguered Rays bullpen to come away with a 4-3 victory in front of 46,465. Hideki Matsui drove in the eventual winning run with a fielder’s-choice groundout off reliever J.P. Howell.

I guess it makes up for yesterday’s bad loss.

--Posted at 4:42 pm by Jonathan / 70 Comments | - (140)




Wednesday, May 6, 2009

MLB.com: No panic, but no comfort, for Yankees

“We know why,” said Damon, when asked how the Red Sox had been able to coast through the first five games of the season series. “They outplayed us. They outpitched us. All of the games were fairly close, but at this point of the season, they’re a better team than we are.”

With their loss on Tuesday in the finale of an abbreviated two-game series, the Yankees have lost their first five games against the Red Sox for the first time since 1985. That year, the punishment was manager Yogi Berra’s job—he was fired one series later, after 6-10 start. The Yankees have not lost their first six contests against the Red Sox since 1912, when they finished the season 50-102 and were still called the New York Highlanders.

The Yankees are back at .500 with a record of 13-13.  When #13 returns, can the real season begin?

--Posted at 11:31 am by Jonathan / 71 Comments | - (139)




Friday, May 1, 2009

April Review

April is the cruelest month.  Well, maybe not exactly cruel in the case of the Yankees.  But, the Bombers haven’t exactly hit the ground running in April the last few years.  The Yankees were 14-15 in April of 2008; 9-14 in 2007; and 13-10 in 2006. 
A record of 12-10, while not quite spectacular, is fairly good all things considered. 

Here’s a quick glance at the Yankee’s month of April in 2009:

The Good

Robinson Cano - Cano’s line of .366/.400/.581 is a bit of a surprise considering that one year earlier he sported a line of .151/.211/.236 and .270/.320/.337 in April of 2007.  The Yankee’s second baseman has, with some exceptions, traditionally been a bit of a slow starter offensively.  We heard reports of a hard-working Cano in the off-season.  It appears that hard work has paid off. 

Nick Swisher - When Xavier Nady went down with an injury, Swisher got his chance to shine, as well as send Ozzie Guillen a message.  Hitting .312/.430/.714, and sporting a 192 OPS+, the message is loud and clear.  While you can expect Swisher to come back to earth as the season progresses, his contributions in April were certainly huge with Alex Rodriguez on the DL and Mark Teixeira struggling.

Andy Pettitte - The off-season drama that was the “will they or won’t they resign Andy” took a back seat to the Teixeira and Sabathia headlines.  However, through the first month of the season, the Pettitte signing has turned out to have had the most impact.  The veteran left hander is 2-1 with a 161 ERA+ so far this season.  Not bad from your #5 starter.

Hideki Matsui - After a somewhat slow start, Matsui has settled into a nice offensive groove.  With a few crappy games at the plate to begin the season, all we heard was that his balky surgically repaired knee was shot and he’d never be the same.  Nineteen games worth of a .903 OPS may suggest otherwise.

The Bad

Brian Bruney -  The guy was rolling.  Sporting a .111 BAA with 12 strikeouts through 9 innings, Bruney was making his case as the setup man to Mariano Rivera.  But a strained flexor muscle placed him on the DL.  The good news is that it looks like he will be able to return to the team soon.

Mark Teixeira - OK, so perhaps Mark does not deserve to grace Lee Van Cleef’s title category.  However, he certainly hasn’t excelled in his first month in pinstripes.  He barely escaped a sub .200 AVG for the month of April with a 1-4 night on April 30th, if that means anything to anyone.  Personally, I am still concerned about the wrist injury he suffered early in the month; although there hasn’t been any word from the team that he is feeling any discomfort.  Bottom line: Teixeira is a great hitter.  If he’s healthy going forward, his production will pick up eventually.  And if that happens to coincide with A-Rod’s return, OMGWTFBBQ!

Xavier Nady - The loss of Xavier Nady to a right elbow injury was a hit on the Yankees’ depth.  However, Nady will not need surgery and could return to the team by the end of May.

The Ugly

The New Yankee Stadium Home Opener - Yeah, it might be a bit superficial, but a Yankee win in the first game at the new Yankee Stadium would have been nice.  The game was within reach until an Orioles 9-run 7th inning.  There’s your ugly.

Chien-Ming Wang - Yeah, he’s been pretty bad.  A 34.50 ERA through 3 starts speaks for itself.  It’s tough to get a read on exactly what his major malfunction really is.  After not pitching at all last year after his injury on June 15th, it is possible he’s just not fully recovered.  Or perhaps Wang simply needs to iron out his mechanics.  Whatever the case may be, he continues to work on getting back to form in extended spring training games, but it is unclear as to his exact return date.

Sat. 04/18: CLE 22, NYY 4 - A 14-run second inning for the Indians pretty much took the Yankees out of the game early.  But the worst part was the lack of a Swisher relief appearance.

Sox Sweep Yankees - It was a brutal weekend featuring a Mo blown save, 25 Boston runs, and a steal of home by Jacoby Ellsbury.  Better it happen in April than in September.


There are plenty of other goods that could be listed (Hughes call up and great start, Joba’s recent performance, Burnett’s first few starts, Melancon’s call up, Melky’s revival?, Phil Coke’s pitching), as well as a number of bads (Sabathia’s slow start, Burnett’s meltdown in Boston, Marte’s 15.19 ERA, Gardner’s inability to hit). 
SG will hopefully post the log5 numbers for April, which will likely show the Yankees not too far off pace.  As of today, PECOTA projects the Yankees with a better than 45% chance to take the AL East (highest % of any team) and a 74.21% chance to make the playoffs.

Bring on May!

--Posted at 11:05 am by Jonathan / 70 Comments | - (165)




Friday, April 24, 2009

Boston Herald: Scouting report: Yankees at Red Sox

TONIGHT - RHP Joba Chamberlain (0-0, 5.06 ERA) vs. LHP Jon Lester [stats] (1-2, 5.50). TV - NESN. Radio - WRKO-AM (680). 7:10.

TOMORROW - RHP A.J. Burnett (2-0, 3.20) vs. RHP Josh Beckett [stats] (2-1, 3.79). TV - Ch. 25. Radio - WRKO. 4:10 p.m.

SUNDAY - LHP Andy Pettitte (2-0, 2.53) vs. RHP Justin Masterson (1-0, 3.18). TV - ESPN. Radio - WRKO. 8:05 p.m.

Anything less than two out of three is unacceptable Yanks.

--Posted at 8:40 am by SG / 75 Comments | - (128)




Thursday, April 9, 2009

Daily News: A.J. Burnett sharp, bats come alive as Yankees avert sweep against Orioles

Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher both homered in support of A.J. Burnett, who gave up two runs in 5 1/3 innings to pick up his first win, as the Yankees avoided a season-opening sweep with an 11-2 win over the Orioles.

Burnett gave up seven hits and walked one, striking out six - the first strikeouts this season by a Yankees starter - giving the Bombers the type of performance that neither CC Sabathia nor Chien-Ming Wang was able to provide.

Swisher had three hits - including a two-run homer that put the Yankees ahead for good - and matched a career-high with five RBI in his first start of the year, while Teixeira went 2-for-4 with a home run and two runs scored, silencing the Camden Yards crowd that had lustily jeered him for three consecutive days.

--Posted at 6:37 pm by Jonathan / 18 Comments | - (180)




Tuesday, January 13, 2009

NY Daily News: A tale of two stoves: While Yankees break bank, Red Sox hit bargain bin

If you didn’t know better, you’d think the Yankees were oblivious to this wretched economy and the Sawx were going overboard to make a statement for austerity. But the fact is both teams have operated the way they have this winter due to some unfavorable circumstances

How can Boston compete without a salary cap?  Bud Selig, do your job…

--Posted at 9:39 am by SG / 93 Comments | - (159)




Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Daily News: Mark Teixeira’s wife Leigh nudged hubby toward Yankees

Every Friday night, Mark Teixeira and his wife, Leigh, have “date night” - dinner at their country club near their home in Texas. Two weeks before Christmas, it was more than just a chance to spend time together - it was the night Leigh Teixeira nudged her husband toward the Bronx.

Throughout his free agency, Teixeira solicited his wife’s opinion and she kept saying, “I just want you to be happy,” Teixeira recalled. On date night, Teixeira asked, “Everything’s equal, where do you want to go? She finally said, ‘I want you to be a Yankee.’”

God bless that woman.

And:
NY Times: Teixeira’s Wife Made the Call

As sweet as Teixeira’s reliance on his wife may seem to some, the Red Sox surely do not think it was cute. John Henry, the owner of the Red Sox; Larry Lucchino, their president; and General Manager Theo Epstein trekked to Texas to meet with Teixeira on Dec. 18, six days after Leigh revealed a preference for the Yankees. The Red Sox would not have sent three executives to Teixeira’s home unless they were confident about signing him.

Also,
Yankees Sign Angel Berroa
Thanks to DaPuj for the link.

--Posted at 11:05 pm by Jonathan / 63 Comments | - (191)




Friday, December 26, 2008

An Early Look at the 2009 AL East

I used Sean Smith’s CHONE projections and built depth charts for offense, pitching and defense to get a rough idea of how the AL East would look right now on paper.

Offense

BR Batting runs using linear weights
RS Runs saved compared to average on defense using CHONE’s projections, which are a combination of the standard zone rating that I use and John DeWan’s revised zone rating that is used on the Hardball Times site.

I did not use a replacement level for the bench here, I filled in the actual bench players for each team based on MLB.com’s depth charts.  Playing time for the starters was primarily based on their projected playing time in CHONE, with the gaps filled in by the bench, ensuring that it all added up to 4100 outs which is the average of the outs made during batting by all teams last season.

Defense is already factored into the pitching projections that follow, so I did not double-count it.  I’m just displaying it for informational purposes.

Pitching

According to CHONE, the Yankee pitching will lead the division in Ks and fewest HRs allowed.  You can see by FIP they project to be the best staff in the AL East, although defense looks like it will narrow the gap between them and Tampa pretty significantly.  BTW, the Yankee pitching projection no longer includes Andy Pettitte, as the inevitable may have not been inevitable after all.  Ya snooze, ya lose Pettitte.

So what do all these dorky numbers really mean?

Overall

RS: Runs scored
RA: Runs allowed
Pyth W: PythagenPat Wins
Pyth L: PythagenPat losses
Opp W%: Projected winning percentage for the other four teams in the division

This table lists the projected runs scored, runs allowed and Pythagenpat wins and losses for each AL East team.  The Opp W% column is the Pythagenpat record for each of the four AL East teams besides the listed team.  I use this to calculate an AL East penalty for each team’s record.  Which is 38 - Opp W% times 76.  That works out to:

NYA (-2.6)
BOS (-2.8)
TBA (-3.3)
TOR (-4.8)
BAL (-5.3)

I add that to the PythagenPat wins to get a revised win/loss record.

And there you have it.  The Yankees do look like the favorite in the AL East by this particular methodology, although it’s by no means a runaway.

--Posted at 9:42 am by SG / 70 Comments | - (491)




Monday, December 22, 2008

So Who’s Got the Best Rotation in the AL East Now (CHONE edition)?

One of the things I will freely acknowledge is that my CAIRO projection system is somewhat limited (as are all projection systems).  That’s why I like to look at lots of different projections to get a feel for what other formulas and algorithms predict.  Because of this, I’m going to look at the same question as I did yesterday regarding the best rotation in the AL East, but this time I’ll use Sean Smith’s recently posted CHONE projections instead of CAIRO.

One difference here is that Sean’s projections are not neutral, but are adjusted for park and defense.  RSAR are still comparable since they’re park-adjusted, but keep the park and defense impact in mind when looking at the raw numbers like ERA.


RSAR: Runs saved above replacement-level
IP/S: Innings pitched per start

CHONE is more conservative than CAIRO on projected innings pitched both per game started and over a full season, so I had to adjust some pitchers innings up and there are more innings from the sixth starters to get each team to 162 starts.  Also, CHONE’s replacement level is lower (worse) than CAIRO’s, so the RSAR totals are bigger here, although it’s all relative so it’s not a problem.

CHONE likes Boston’s rotation a little more than CAIRO, primarily Beckett and Matsuzaka.  Overall, CHONE says the Red Sox rotation should save 163 runs above replacement level using my estimated playing time.

Tampa is basically even with Boston at 162 RSAR, although David Price’s projection is a lot more pessimistic here.  That’s mitigated by better projections for Shields, Kazmir, Sonnanstine and Garza though.

Lower innings across the board here for everyone, but the Yankee rotation still looks like the class of the AL East with these numbers, although the gap narrows from the 6 wins I had with CAIRO to 4 wins.

And here’s a final comparison of the CHONE totals.

Looks like further encouraging data to me, at least on the starting pitching front.

Reader zellyanks91 emailed me an interesting blog entry he wrote about his interaction with Phil Hughes on a baseball card forum.  Hughes seems like a really good guy from reading this.

--Posted at 1:01 pm by SG / 50 Comments | - (189)




Sunday, December 21, 2008

So Who’s Got the Best Rotation in the AL East Now?

With the Yankees’ signings of C.C. Sabathia and A.J. Burnett, many pundits are saying they now have the best starting rotation in the AL East.  Let’s use CAIRO to see if that’s actually true or not.  With all due respect to Baltimore and Toronto, I’m leaving them out of this analysis.

Here’s a look at Boston, New York and Tampa’s neutral CAIRO projections.  These are not adjusted for the AL, for park, or for defense in order to have a level playing field for comparison.  The neutral league I use is 2% worse than the AL.  For now I’m assuming good health for every team, so I’m using only the top six starters on each team’s depth chart and pro-rating the teams to 162 starts.

RSAR: Runs saved above replacement-level
IP/S: Innings pitched per start

Jon Lester’s projection in particular is probably too pessismistic since it includes his 2006 and 2007 which were severly impacted by his illness.  Still, until we have more data we shouldn’t expect him to continue to pitch as well as he did in 2008, although I’d probably bet on him to be around his 65% projection (neutral: 3.81 ERA, 30 RSAR). Matsuzaka’s 2008 ERA was way out of line with his peripherals, and CAIRO expects him to regress back towards those peripherals quite a bit in ‘09, as do I. The ERA projections go up once you move the pitchers to the AL and Fenway, but this is a pretty good rotation.

Obviously, Tampa’s a media darling now after their meteoric rise in 2008, although several statheads saw it coming beforehand.  They also look to have a pretty solid rotation now, fronted by James Shields and Scott Kazmir.  Edwin Jackson’s gone, replaced by David Price, whose projection is based on a single year’s data and is probably not very useful.  He could be a lot better, or he could be worse, but he’s definitely got the talent to be a difference-maker in Tampa’s rotation.

Yeah, adding C.C. and A.J. looks pretty sweet on paper here.  I’m including Andy Pettitte here based on this article that says Pettitte’s return is ‘inevitable’.  Joba’s projection is probably too optimistic, but he’s a bad-ass regardless.

Assuming health out of Burnett, Chamberlain, Wang and Hughes, this rotation projects to blow away Boston and Tampa, to the tune of 6 wins above replacement.  Part of that is in a better rate performance (ERA of 3.72 vs. 4.19 and 4.24), but there’s also an important factor here that could have a cascade effect.  The Yankee rotation projects to have four separate pitchers who would average 6.2 to 6.9 innings per start.  None of the other teams have more than one such pitcher.  That means fewer bullpen innings, which helps a) rest the pen b) keep the ball away from the worse pitchers in the back of the pen. 

Of course, I’ll again reiterate that this assumes good health which is a massive assumption, although the same holds in varying extents for Tampa and Boston.  I’d also be interested in seeing what other projection systems besides CAIRO say.

Here’s a final comparison of the totals for each of the three teams.

This doesn’t mean the Yankees should be favored to win the AL East by any means.  We have to look at the bullpens, offenses and defenses and how they all fit together.  Before doing that though I’d assume Boston is still the AL East favorite, with the Yankees probably ahead of Tampa now, but a lot can change over the next three months.  Now, if the Yankees can sign Teixeira, they probably jump ahead of Boston.

On a completely unrelated note, Sean Smith has opened a new website for his CHONE projections.  Sean’s projections are some of the better ones out there, and are completely free.  You can check it out at baseballprojection.com

--Posted at 2:26 pm by SG / 122 Comments | - (281)




Monday, De