Tuesday, December 1, 2009
2009 Yankees Season in Review: Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the Defense
As requested, here’s a look at how Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the overall team defense did compared to their projections.
After a 2008 season that saw him get to AA, Cervelli was still probably off the radar for 2009 despite a brief cameo at the end of 2008. However, injuries forced him into the picture, and he ended up getting 101 PAs. Here are his projections entering 2009, pro-rated to those 101 PAs.
| francisco cervelli | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 101 | 92 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 25 | .223 | .296 | .304 | 53 | .268 | .174 | .221 | .315 | .362 | 95.3% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 101 | 90 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 18 | .272 | .337 | .422 | 82 | .321 | .221 | .271 | .370 | .420 | 114.2% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 24 | .229 | .300 | .335 | 60 | .277 | .182 | .229 | .324 | .372 | 98.5% |
| 2009 tht projection | 101 | 91 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 18 | .236 | .315 | .321 | 59 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.1% |
| 2009 zips projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 18 | .236 | .317 | .304 | 56 | .281 | .186 | .234 | .329 | .377 | 100.2% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 101 | 91 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 21 | .240 | .314 | .326 | 61 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.2% |
| 2009 average projection | 101 | 90 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 21 | .239 | .313 | .335 | 62 | .286 | .190 | .238 | .334 | .382 | 101.8% |
| 2009 actuals | 101 | 94 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | .298 | .309 | .372 | 55 | .281 | .185 | .233 | .329 | .376 |
Cervelli had shown pretty good plate discipline in the minors, but it deserted him in the majors. Despite that, he was able to come fairly close to his projected OBP because he hit six more singles. That also explains why he was able to exceed his SLG by a fair amount.
The .298 average is nice, but it was sort of empty, and it's doubtful he'll be able to replicate the same type of performance in 2010 if he has to rely on hitting .298 to do it. The good news is he should walk a little more and he's still going to be just 24, so he has room for growth in his offensive game. While it's probably unlikely he'll be more than a backup, he should be a decent one, especially if the good defense he showed in 2009 carries forward.
Sort of like Cervelli, Ramiro Pena hadn't gotten past AA prior to 2009, and he hadn't really impressed there either, slugging a monstrous .297 in 2008 for Trenton. Pena's calling card isn't his bat though, it's his glove. In a surprise, he made the Yankees on opening day as a backup IF, since Alex Rodriguez was out rehabbing his hip and the only other backup IF on the roster was Angel Berroa.
Because of Pena's unimpressive minor league resume, his projections were unimpressive.
| ramiro pena | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 121 | 113 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 25 | .233 | .284 | .297 | 48 | .258 | .173 | .215 | .300 | .342 | 86.7% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 121 | 110 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 20 | .224 | .272 | .320 | 50 | .255 | .170 | .212 | .297 | .339 | 85.7% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 121 | 108 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 16 | .223 | .285 | .286 | 47 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .339 | 85.8% |
| 2009 tht projection | 121 | 113 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 22 | .224 | .276 | .291 | 45 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .294 | .336 | 84.8% |
| 2009 zips projection | 121 | 114 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16 | .224 | .269 | .263 | 39 | .240 | .158 | .199 | .282 | .323 | 80.9% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 121 | 112 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 21 | .232 | .282 | .290 | 46 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .340 | 85.9% |
| 2009 average projection | 121 | 112 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 20 | .227 | .278 | .291 | 46 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .295 | .337 | 85.0% |
| 2009 actuals | 121 | 115 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | .287 | .317 | .383 | 71 | .297 | .208 | .253 | .342 | .386 |
Like Cervelli, Pena hit more and walked less than expected. However, he did show a little more pop than projected, with two extra doubles. Obviously when we're dealing with sample sizes like this we shouldn't try to infer too much about what it means going forward, but Pena's final line in 2009 was better than replacement level, and would have made him about a win better than replacement level on offense if he had done it over 650 PAs.
So, how about the Yankee defense?
Since I started blogging in 2004, there's been one recurring theme with the Yankees. Their defense has generally been bad to awful. While you can hit and pitch well enough to overcome that, it can be frustrating to watch players not making plays other players can make.
When the Yankees let Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi go and replaced them with Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher, that alone looked like a pretty decent defensive upgrade. Here's how the defense projected heading into 2009 compared to what they actually ended up doing.
| Player | Pos | pZR | pUZR | pRAA | zRSAA | uRSAA | aRSAA | diff |
| Jorge Posada | C | -5 | -10 | -5 | ||||
| Jose Molina | C | 2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -4 | ||
| Francisco Cervelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Kevin Cash | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
| Mark Teixeira | 1B | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -4 | 2 | -1 |
| Juan Miranda | 1B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 2 | -2 | 0 | -2 | -5 | -3 | -4 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | -2 | -1 | -2 | -6 | -9 | -7 | -6 |
| Cody Ransom | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 |
| Angel Berroa | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -1 | -1 |
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -1 | -1 |
| Brett Gardner | CF | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Johnny Damon | LF | -1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -9 | -5 | -6 |
| Freddy Guzman | LF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Swisher | RF | 1 | 1 | 1 | -4 | -1 | -3 | -4 |
| Eric Hinske | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Xavier Nady | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Jeter | SS | -5 | -5 | -5 | -2 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Ramiro Pena | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | -2 | -27 | -25 |
pZR: Projected runs saved above average according to zone rating, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pUZR: Projected runs saved above average according to UZR, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pRAA: Average of pZR and pUZR
zRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to zone rating
uRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to UZR
aRSAA: Average of zRSAA and uRSAA
diff: aRSAA - pRAA (negative means worse than projected)
The Yankee defense actually didn't play as well as projected, with the primary culprits being Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. Cody Ransom and Angel Berroa's contributions also didn't really help. On the plus side, Derek Jeter was seven runs better than projected and Brett Gardner was two runs better.
Last year's team was about 40 runs below average, so at the very least they were better than that.
Interestingly, I completely forgot to do a season review for Mark Teixeira and Alex Rodriguez, so I'll post that next, then Mo's and then that should wrap up the backwards-looking stuff for now.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
2007 ALDS: Yankee Run Values
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | BRAA | DRAA | TRAA |
| R Cano | 16 | .333 | .375 | .800 | 1.175 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| S Duncan | 4 | .500 | .500 | .500 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A Rodriguez | 17 | .267 | .353 | .467 | .820 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M Cabrera | 16 | .188 | .188 | .375 | .563 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
| B Sardinha | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| J Damon | 19 | .278 | .316 | .611 | .927 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| H Matsui | 16 | .182 | .438 | .182 | .620 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| J Giambi | 4 | .250 | .250 | .250 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D Mientkiewicz | 8 | .000 | .143 | .000 | .143 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| J Posada | 17 | .133 | .235 | .200 | .435 | -2 | 0 | -2 |
| B Abreu | 17 | .267 | .353 | .533 | .886 | 1 | -4 | -3 |
| D Jeter | 17 | .176 | .176 | .176 | .352 | -2 | -1 | -3 |
BRAA: Batting runs above average by linear weights
DRAA: Defensive runs saved above average by linear weights
TRAA: BRAA + DRAA
| Player | IP | H | HR | BB | SO | RA | ERA | RSAA |
| A Pettitte | 6.3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| M Rivera | 4.7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| P Hughes | 5.7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 2 |
| K Farnsworth | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| M Mussina | 4.7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3.86 | 3.86 | 1 |
| J Veras | 0.7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| R Villone | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| J Chamberlain | 3.7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4.91 | 4.91 | 0 |
| L Vizcaino | 0.7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13.50 | 13.50 | -1 |
| R Clemens | 2.3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11.57 | 11.57 | -2 |
| R Ohlendorf | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 27.00 | 27.00 | -2 |
| C Wang | 5.7 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 19.06 | 19.06 | -9 |
RSAA: Runs saved above average
| Player | TRAA |
| A Pettitte | 3 |
| M Rivera | 3 |
| P Hughes | 2 |
| R Cano | 1 |
| K Farnsworth | 1 |
| M Mussina | 1 |
| J Veras | 0 |
| S Duncan | 0 |
| A Rodriguez | 0 |
| R Villone | 0 |
| M Cabrera | 0 |
| B Sardinha | 0 |
| J Chamberlain | 0 |
| J Damon | 0 |
| H Matsui | 0 |
| J Giambi | 0 |
| L Vizcaino | -1 |
| D Mientkiewicz | -1 |
| J Posada | -2 |
| R Clemens | -2 |
| R Ohlendorf | -2 |
| B Abreu | -3 |
| D Jeter | -3 |
| C Wang | -9 |
| Total | -13 |
TRAA: TRAA/RSAA
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
Lohud Yankees Blog - Abraham: Torre announces lineup for Game 1
From the ever vigilant Peter Abraham:
Johnny Damon LF
Derek Jeter SS
Bobby Abreu RF
Alex Rodriguez 3B
Jorge Posada C
Hideki Matsui DH
Robinson Cano 2B
Melky Cabrera CF
Doug Mientkiewicz 1B
Chien-Ming Wang RHP
No surprises really. The Yankees also added Ross Ohlendorf and Jose Veras to the bullpen and subtracted Ron Villone. I guess I need to project them both.
2007 Yankees vs. Indians ALDS Breakdown - Part Three
Today I conclude my ALDS preview with a look at the Yankee and Indian bullpens. First up, here's the Indians' pen.| Pitcher | G | IP | H | HR | R | ER | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | ||
| Closer | Borowski | 2007 | 69 | 65.7 | 77 | 9 | 39 | 37 | 17 | 58 | .289 | .315 | .436 |
| Proj | 60 | 59 | 60 | 8 | 31 | 30 | 21 | 50 | .261 | .305 | .415 | ||
| Setup | Betancourt | 2007 | 68 | 79.3 | 51 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 9 | 80 | .183 | .197 | .277 |
| Proj | 60 | 69 | 55 | 5 | 21 | 20 | 12 | 69 | .215 | .235 | .332 | ||
| Middle | Laffey | 2007 | 9 | 49.3 | 54 | 2 | 26 | 25 | 12 | 25 | .287 | .338 | .388 |
| Proj | 37 | 205 | 233 | 19 | 120 | 111 | 12 | 25 | .279 | .287 | .412 | ||
| Perez | 2007 | 44 | 60.7 | 41 | 5 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 62 | .187 | .229 | .292 | |
| Proj | 33 | 40 | 28 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 42 | .190 | .235 | .297 | ||
| Fultz | 2007 | 49 | 37 | 31 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 28 | .228 | .304 | .346 | |
| Proj | 57 | 56 | 51 | 5 | 24 | 22 | 23 | 44 | .245 | .302 | .388 | ||
| Mastny | 2007 | 51 | 57.7 | 63 | 6 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 52 | .283 | .336 | .435 | |
| Proj | 36 | 40 | 43 | 4 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 36 | .282 | .337 | .422 | ||
| Lewis | 2007 | 26 | 29.3 | 26 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 34 | .234 | .288 | .315 | |
| Proj | 26 | 115 | 121 | 15 | 57 | 56 | 43 | 93 | .261 | .321 | .415 | ||
| Pitcher | GB% | FB% | LD% | RA | ERA | ERC | FIP | HR+ | BB+ | K+ | RS/G | ||
| Closer | Borowski | 2007 | 36% | 31% | 19% | 5.34 | 5.07 | 3.90 | 3.56 | 85 | 146 | 116 | -.067 |
| Proj | 38% | 32% | 17% | 4.82 | 4.61 | 3.92 | 4.11 | 95 | 124 | 117 | -.012 | ||
| Setup | Betancourt | 2007 | 29% | 37% | 19% | 1.48 | 1.48 | 2.07 | 2.74 | 190 | 274 | 162 | .419 |
| Proj | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2.68 | 2.55 | 2.42 | 2.59 | 141 | 255 | 155 | .261 | ||
| Middle | Laffey | 2007 | 64% | 15% | 17% | 4.75 | 4.56 | 3.69 | 3.88 | 272 | 147 | 71 | -.022 |
| Proj | 64% | 15% | 17% | 6.92 | 6.40 | 1.42 | 1.66 | 118 | 607 | 17 | -1.364 | ||
| Perez | 2007 | 55% | 20% | 17% | 2.22 | 1.78 | 2.87 | 2.55 | 124 | 134 | 154 | .381 | |
| Proj | 55% | 22% | 16% | 2.51 | 2.12 | 2.16 | 3.03 | 121 | 133 | 160 | .297 | ||
| Fultz | 2007 | 37% | 35% | 22% | 2.92 | 2.92 | 3.77 | 4.57 | 208 | 75 | 104 | .150 | |
| Proj | 40% | 31% | 20% | 3.80 | 3.56 | 3.63 | 3.80 | 146 | 101 | 113 | .098 | ||
| Mastny | 2007 | 44% | 29% | 19% | 4.68 | 4.68 | 4.05 | 3.96 | 115 | 70 | 116 | .004 | |
| Proj | 45% | 28% | 20% | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.41 | 4.00 | 133 | 90 | 120 | -.015 | ||
| Lewis | 2007 | 36% | 33% | 18% | 2.46 | 2.15 | 2.35 | 3.17 | 328 | 107 | 159 | .282 | |
| Proj | 36% | 33% | 18% | 4.45 | 4.37 | 1.42 | 1.66 | 90 | 101 | 107 | .128 |
AVG: Opponents' batting average against
OBP: Opponents' on base percentage against
SLG: Opponents' slugging against
GB%: Groundball percentage
FB%: Fly ball percentage
LD%: Line drive percentage
ERA: Earned run average
ERC: Component ERA (31 times OBP times SLG)
FIP: Fielding independent pitching
HR+: HRs per batters faced compared to league average. 100 is average, > 100 is better
BB+: BBs per batters faced compared to league average 100 is average, > 100 is better
K+: Ks per batters faced compared to league average. 100 is average, > 100 is better
RS/G: Runs saved per game compared to league average
Despite an ERA over 5, Joe Borowski racked up 45 saves. Borowski's peripherals are actually better than you'd expect by looking at his ERA. Opponents are hitting .289/.315/.436 against him, which translates to a component ERA of 3.90. His FIP is also decent at 3.56.
He's appeared in 69 games and allowed 37 earned runs. However, 14 of those runs came in just three appearances, April 19 against the Yanks, May 13 against Oakland and August 14 against Detroit. If you remove those three outings from his ledger, you get a more respectable 3.23 ERA. Of course you can play that game with anyone, but Borowski's not as bad as it first appears.
Borowski isn't the main reason to be concerned about the Indians bullpen. They have Rafael Betancourt setting him up, and he's been flat out dominant all season. His HR+, BB+, and K+ are all off the charts good. Opponents hit .183/.197/.277 against him this season. He's probably pitching over his head, but he's been a solid reliever for a few years now (career ERA of 2.80).
The other primary reason that the Indians' bullpen should concern us as Yankee fans are the lefties they'll be carrying.
Their primary lefty reliever is Rafael Perez. He throws a 92-94 mph fastball and a nasty slider, and has been nasty this season. He's not just a lefty killer, as he's pitched 60.2 innings in 44 games after getting called up from Buffalo where he was a starter. Betancourt and Perez are a sick combo to set up Borowski.
Aaron Fultz has bounced around a bit, and has been fairly pedestrian, but he has done well against lefties.
The third lefty that the Indians will carry in the bullpen is Aaron Laffey, who they've used exclusively as a starter. His splits against lefties aren't very good, but as the third man on the depth chart that shouldn't matter that much since he probably wouldn't have to be used in high-leverage situations.
Here's how the three lefties splits look for 2007 and over their careers.
| Pitcher | Split | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | K | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
| Fultz | 2007 | vs RHB | 79 | 68 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 16 | .265 | .342 | .353 |
| vs LHB | 79 | 68 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 12 | .191 | .291 | .338 | ||
| Career | vs RHB | 1227 | 1072 | 295 | 65 | 7 | 39 | 121 | 223 | .275 | .350 | .458 | |
| vs LHB | 830 | 728 | 172 | 39 | 5 | 11 | 66 | 171 | .236 | .303 | .349 | ||
| Perez | 2007 | vs RHB | 144 | 136 | 29 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 40 | .217 | .257 | .324 |
| vs LHB | 92 | 83 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 22 | .145 | .209 | .241 | ||
| Career | vs RHB | 173 | 162 | 36 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 48 | .222 | .272 | .352 | |
| vs LHB | 119 | 106 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 29 | .142 | .214 | .217 | ||
| Laffey | 2007 | vs RHB | 139 | 129 | 35 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 15 | .271 | .304 | .357 |
| vs LHB | 68 | 59 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 10 | .322 | .412 | .458 |
Tom Mastny and Jensen Lewis round out the Indians pen. Mastny's nothing special. Lewis has been great in his major league debut but his projections coming into the season weren't very impressive.
Overall this season, Cleveland's bullpen ranked fourth in the AL in ERA at 3.75. Late inning comebacks will be hard to come by in this series for the Yankees.
Here's the Yankee pen minus the 11th pitcher that they will announce at some point.
| Pitcher | G | IP | H | HR | R | ER | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | ||
| Closer | Rivera | 2007 | 67 | 71.3 | 68 | 4 | 25 | 25 | 12 | 74 | .248 | .285 | .350 |
| Proj | 67 | 75 | 62 | 3 | 20 | 19 | 14 | 69 | .224 | .263 | .300 | ||
| Setup | Chamberlain | 2007 | 19 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 34 | .145 | .200 | .229 |
| Proj | 44 | 49 | 32 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 63 | .180 | .245 | .279 | ||
| Middle | Vizcaino | 2007 | 77 | 75.3 | 66 | 6 | 38 | 37 | 44 | 62 | .235 | .301 | .384 |
| Proj | 72 | 71 | 63 | 8 | 33 | 31 | 35 | 61 | .237 | .300 | .398 | ||
| Farnsworth | 2007 | 64 | 60 | 60 | 9 | 35 | 32 | 27 | 48 | .256 | .327 | .415 | |
| Proj | 69 | 64 | 58 | 8 | 32 | 29 | 28 | 67 | .237 | .309 | .376 | ||
| Villone | 2007 | 37 | 42.3 | 36 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 18 | 25 | .234 | .324 | .344 | |
| Proj | 57 | 66 | 59 | 7 | 36 | 33 | 36 | 54 | .241 | .327 | .367 | ||
| Hughes | 2007 | 13 | 73 | 64 | 8 | 39 | 36 | 29 | 58 | .235 | .310 | .386 | |
| Proj | 13 | 73 | 67 | 8 | 35 | 32 | 26 | 59 | .246 | .310 | .397 | ||
| Pitcher | GB% | FB% | LD% | RA | ERA | ERC | FIP | HR+ | BB+ | K+ | RS/G | ||
| Closer | Rivera | 2007 | 53% | 21% | 19% | 3.16 | 3.16 | 2.53 | 2.64 | 194 | 210 | 147 | .184 |
| Proj | 56% | 21% | 15% | 2.43 | 2.25 | 2.45 | 2.58 | 265 | 209 | 139 | .281 | ||
| Setup | Chamberlain | 2007 | 38% | 28% | 24% | 0.75 | 0.38 | 1.42 | 1.66 | 255 | 144 | 229 | .556 |
| Proj | 38% | 28% | 24% | 2.02 | 1.84 | 2.12 | 2.40 | 172 | 104 | 188 | .333 | ||
| Middle | Vizcaino | 2007 | 37% | 34% | 20% | 4.54 | 4.42 | 3.98 | 4.41 | 147 | 65 | 108 | .018 |
| Proj | 42% | 31% | 17% | 4.12 | 3.99 | 3.71 | 4.10 | 92 | 58 | 115 | .064 | ||
| Farnsworth | 2007 | 30% | 43% | 18% | 5.25 | 4.80 | 4.90 | 4.88 | 78 | 84 | 106 | -.056 | |
| Proj | 36% | 35% | 18% | 4.43 | 4.09 | 3.61 | 4.04 | 99 | 85 | 146 | .030 | ||
| Villone | 2007 | 37% | 31% | 22% | 4.26 | 4.26 | 4.83 | 4.65 | 92 | 83 | 83 | .058 | |
| Proj | 38% | 32% | 19% | 4.93 | 4.52 | 3.72 | 4.54 | 123 | 74 | 113 | -.028 | ||
| Hughes | 2007 | 38% | 32% | 22% | 4.83 | 4.46 | 3.72 | 4.31 | 108 | 84 | 115 | -.073 | |
| Proj | 38% | 32% | 22% | 4.31 | 3.98 | 3.82 | 4.04 | 101 | 100 | 113 | .249 |
Unlike the Indians, the Yankees don't have depth in their bullpen. Mariano Rivera had a down year by his lofty standards, but he was still very effective, and his peripherals are all solid. He gave up more line drives this year, and more hits in general, but there's no reason to be concerned about him.
Joba Chamberlain. Man, myth, legend. We like Joba so much we sponsored his Baseball Reference page. The Joba rules are out the window for the postseason with the importance of the games and the added off days, so expect to see him late in any games the Yankees are leading.
It's been a tale of three seasons for Luis Vizcaino. From April 2 through June 2, Vizcaino pitched 27 innings and had an ERA of 7.33. Opponents hit .248/.381/.436 against him. From June 3 to August 29 Vizcaino pitched 40.1 innings with 1.12 ERA. He fanned 37 while opponents hit .181/.268/.264 against him. In September he struggled due to fatigue and was shut down several times. In 8 September innings he allowed 15 hits and had an ERA of 10.13, and opponents hit .417/.464/.722. Hopefully the rest he's getting now will get him back to form.
Phil Hughes will be the primary long reliever in the bullpen, likely to pick up the slack should one of the starters get bombed. Hughes has not pitched out of the pen yet. He showed glimpses of the promise that he had in the minors over his last five outings, throwing 29.2 innings with an ERA of 2.73. Hughes beat Cleveland on Aug 10, going six strong innings and allowing just one run.
Kyle Farnsworth scares me. Thankfully, Chamberlain's emergence has removed him from the nominal 8th inning role. Ron Villone scares me too, although less so than Farnsworth. Villone was actually decent this year overall, he held opponents to a .234/.324/.344 and put up an ERA around league average. He really had only two bad outings this year, where he gave 8 runs over 2/3 of an inning. If we could take those out, he'd have had an ERA of 2.59. But we can't, so he doesn't.
I'm not sure who the sixth man will be. Based on usage patterns over the last week of the season I think it's going to be Jose Veras. I'm not sold on him because of his lack of command, but his stuff is pretty good so maybe he could surprise us. Edwar Ramirez looks like he's pitched his way off the roster. I still like Ramirez's chances of contributing in the future, but I don't think he's ready yet. Ross Ohlendorf could end up being the choice, and that's probably who I'd like to see go. He had an unimpressive season in AAA but he has looked good in the big league pen, with a good sinking fastball and a sharp slider, and he has better command than Veras.
The Yankee bullpen struggled most of the year, and were tenth in the league in ERA.
This is going to be a tough series for the Yankees to take. The Yankees are the better offensive team, but the Indians have better pitching. The defenses are comparable. I think it's going to be up to the Yankee starting pitchers getting deep enough in the games that they can go to Vizcaino, Chamberlain, and Mo. If that happens the Yanks should be in good shape. I won't predict what might happen, because I have no idea. After the way this season started, I'm just glad to see the Yanks playing in October right now. I'm sure I'll feel differently after the first pitch on Thursday though.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Picking the 2007 Postseason Roster
Now that the Yankees are officially in the playoffs, I can finally talk about the postseason roster. With the injuries to Carl Pavano, Darrell Rasner, Humberto Sanchez, and Andy Phillips, the Yankees basically have the flexibility to use anyone they want from their 40 man roster. Here’s a look at the candidates, with the players on the bubble separated out.
Starting Pitchers(4)
Andy Pettitte
Roger Clemens
Chien-Ming Wang
Mike Mussina
Relief Pitchers(5)
Mariano Rivera
Joba Chamberlain
Phil Hughes
Kyle Farnsworth
Luis Vizcaino
On the Bubble
Chris Britton
Brian Bruney
Tyler Clippard
Matt DeSalvo
Chase Wright
Jose Veras
Ron Villone
Sean Henn
Kei Igawa
Jeff Karstens
Ian Kennedy
Ross Ohlendorf
Edwar Ramirez
Catchers(2)
Jose Molina
Jorge Posada
Infielders(5)
Robinson Cano
Derek Jeter
Doug Mientkiewicz
Alex Rodriguez
Wilson Betemit
On the Bubble
Alberto Gonzalez
Outfielders (5)
Bobby Abreu
Melky Cabrera
Johnny Damon
Shelley Duncan
Hideki Matsui
On the Bubble
Bronson Sardinha
Designated Hitters(1)
Jason Giambi
There are 22 players I consider locks to make the roster, four starting pitchers, five relievers, two catchers, five infielders, five outfielders, and one DH. That gives the Yanks three slots to fill. If it were up to me, I’d take two more pitchers and one position player.
The position player seems like an easy choice to me, if choosing between Alberto Gonzalez or Bronson Sardinha I’d take the more valuable defensive player. Either can pinch-run, but Gonzalez gives the Yankees a little more depth in case of multiple injuries to their starting infielders.
The pitching situation is a little less clear-cut. Phil Hughes slots in as a long reliever, but the rest of the choices are mainly short relievers and that’s a concern with a gimpy Roger Clemens and Mike “Box of Chocolates” Mussina taking two starts. Because of this, one of the extra relievers should probably be someone who can pitch multiple innings. Out of the players on the bubble, the best choices for that kind of role in my mind are Kei Igawa or Ron Villone. Neither inspires much confidence, but we have to remember that you don’t have to win every single game in the playoffs, you just have to win 3 or 4 before your opponent does. If Clemens can’t go past the second inning, odds are the game is lost but you don’t want to have to burn out your bullpen either. The off days built into the schedule mitigate that to some degree. The other thing the Yankees should do is break up Pettitte and Wang. Since they’ll be starting on the road, I’d start Pettitte in game one, Clemens in game two, and Wang in game three at home. However, to be safe I think the Yankees should take Igawa. I know he hasn’t been good this year, but he could come into a game in the early innings and pitch 5 or 6 innings and put the Yankees in a position to win the next game. Now all the readers can proceed to tell me I’m insane.
That leaves one other pitcher to take. Ian Kennedy’s hurt so scratch him. Realistically it comes down to taking one of Chris Britton, Brian Bruney, Jose Veras, Villone, Ross Ohlendorf or Edwar Ramirez.
Britton - had success in the AL East last year and did well in AAA this season. For whatever reason he doesn’t seem to be well-regarded by the organization right now, and his stuff isn’t really that great for a short reliever.
Bruney - You know the deal with this guy. Great fastball, horrendous command.
Veras - See Bruney, although with a slightly better breaking pitch. I swear I have not seen Veras hit the catcher’s target on a single pitch yet this season.
Villone - Chock full of veterany-goodness. Hasn’t been horrible this year, but his control scares the hell out of me and he has a very high likelihood to implode in any given outing.
Ohlendorf - He’s looked pretty good so far in the majors, but it’s only been three innings. He’s got good stuff but his minor league numbers are pretty bad, but he was injured for much of the year and converted from a starter to a reliever so that should be considered.
Ramirez - I was pulling like hell for Edwar to come up the majors and succeed, but he still needs to work on his approach IMO. Until he can consistently get ahead in the count and make optimal use of his killer changeup, I wouldn’t have any faith in him in a tight spot. He does have strikeout ability (29 Ks in 19.3 innings), but he also has giving up HR ability (6 in 19.3 innings). He’s probably pitched himself off the postseason roster at this point.
Not a very inspiring bunch. I’d imagine we’ll get a healthy dose of all of these guys over the last four games of the year to see if one becomes a hot hand. I find Ohlendorf the most intriguing of this group, so he’d probably be my pick.
I’d like to see what other people would do instead of me, so let’s hear it…
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
2007 Yankee Defense at the All Star Break
Wrapping up my All Star Break review of the Yankees so far, here's how their defense rates by zone rating. If you want to read a good explanation about zone rating, you should read this article by Chris Dial, but I am going to run through an example as well, to try and clarify exactly what the numbers that will follow mean.I could pick on Derek Jeter, but I'm not going to go there. Instead I'm going to look at the brightest spot on the Yankee defense so far, Robinson Cano. We all know Cano's been a disappointment on offense, but let's look at his defense.
To help clarify the numbers I'm about to run through, here's the Stats Inc. Zone Rating grid, with the 2B area of responsiblity highlighted.

Any ball hit in that highlighted area that is converted into an out at least 50% of the time is considered a fieldable chance for a second baseman. This is based on observation by Stats Inc. scorers, but there are three people scoring these at every game and they score them independently to help cut down on subjectivity.
When a fielder has a ball hit into their zone of responsiblity, they are given a fieldable chance, which is the denominator in ZR. When they convert that into an out, it's considered a play made. When a fielder makes a play that is not his defined zone, it gets added to his chances and plays made so they get credit for it. The question is if they get enough credit for doing so, which is one limitation of zone rating. Another limitation is the zones of responsiblity are fixed, and do not account for positioning. This is a limitation when trying to assess a player's actual talent, but as far as their value in any given time, I don't think it's much of one. If a player is not put into position to make more plays than he is, that means they are not as valuable to their team as they should be, regardless of who is responsible for the positioning.
ZR is expressed as a three digit decimal from 0 to 1, and it's just plays made divided by fieldable chances. So if a player has 10 fieldable chances hit into his defined zone and converts 8 of them into outs, his ZR is .800. Plays are either made or not made in ZR. If a player makes an error, it's no worse than if their range never let them get to the ball in the first place.
So let's get back to Cano. Cano has played 84 games this season, and 747 defensive innings at second base. He has seen 274 fieldable chances, and has a ZR of .880. So we multiply his fieldable chances by .880 to get his plays made, which is 241.
The next thing we do is multiply the chances that Cano has had times the average ZR, to get an average plays made. This assumes that the types of chances a player faces over the course of a period are the same, and it's not necessarily true. Players could have stretches where they face easier chances or more difficult chances, which is why you will see players' defensive numbers fluctuate from season. Again, I consider this a limitation when trying to assess a player's ability, but not their value. This is the type of thing that should even out over time, which makes multi-year zone rating a decent gauge of a player's defensive talent.
In the American League, the average 2B has a ZR of .831. I separate the leagues because I've noticed systemic differences in the infields, and I assume it's at least partly due to pitchers "hitting." So, using the .831 avg ZR times Cano's 274 chances, we get an average plays made of 228. We subtract this from Cano's actual plays made to get a difference. 241 - 228 = 13, so Cano has converted 13 more plays into outs than average. This difference is then multiplied by the average run value of a play at that position, which was calculated by Dial and is based on the linear weights values of the single or XBH that the play would turn into if it is not made, as well as the marginal value of the out that was not recorded.
Here are the run values for the average plays at each position.
POS RV
1B: .798
2B: .754
3B: .800
CF: .842
LF: .831
RF: .843
SS: .753
For 2B, the average play is worth .754 runs, so we multiply that by Cano's +13 plays made and get a runs saved above average of 10. To calculate this over a full season, you just divide the runs saved by the innings played and multiply by 1440 innings.
Credit for this methodology goes to Chris Dial and his article Dr. StrangeGlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Zone Rating and to Chone Smith and his article Tweaking Zone Rating. Without them breaking zone rating down this clearly for me I never would have been able to understand it.
The same basic idea is used for figuring out all players except pitchers and catchers, and here are the numbers for the Yanks.
| Player | TM | LG | Pos | G | GS | INN | PO | A | E | DP | Ch | PM | ZR | Avg ZR | AvgPM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Cano, Robinson | NYY | AL | 2B | 84 | 84 | 747 | 178 | 271 | 6 | 78 | 274 | 241 | .880 | .831 | 228 | 13 | 10 | 19 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | NYY | AL | 3B | 83 | 83 | 724 | 63 | 149 | 5 | 15 | 207 | 168 | .812 | .762 | 158 | 10 | 8 | 16 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | CF | 59 | 48 | 445 | 154 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 166 | 152 | .916 | .889 | 148 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | LF | 18 | 16 | 142 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 31 | .912 | .872 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 3B | 7 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | .900 | .762 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 45 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | SS | 8 | 2 | 36.2 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 16 | .889 | .824 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 35 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | RF | 4 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1.000 | .859 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 48 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | RF | 4 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | .859 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Giambi, Jason | NYY | AL | 1B | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | .842 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Basak, Chris | NYY | AL | 3B | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | .762 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 91 |
| Posada, Jorge | NYY | AL | 1B | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | 1B | 3 | 0 | 4.1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nieves, Wil | NYY | AL | 1B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phillips, Andy | NYY | AL | 3B | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .762 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | CF | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .889 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Basak, Chris | NYY | AL | SS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .824 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | LF | 4 | 1 | 13.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | .833 | .872 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -21 |
| Phillips, Andy | NYY | AL | 1B | 13 | 10 | 90.1 | 85 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 16 | 13 | .813 | .842 | 13 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 2B | 2 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6 | .750 | .831 | 7 | -1 | 0 | -41 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | LF | 3 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | .667 | .872 | 3 | -1 | -1 | -57 |
| Phelps, Josh | NYY | AL | 1B | 29 | 20 | 162.2 | 167 | 9 | 3 | 16 | 27 | 22 | .815 | .842 | 23 | -1 | -1 | -5 |
| Abreu, Bobby | NYY | AL | RF | 84 | 81 | 720 | 156 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 183 | 156 | .852 | .859 | 157 | -1 | -1 | -2 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | LF | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | .333 | .872 | 3 | -2 | -1 | -215 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | CF | 41 | 38 | 318 | 106 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 119 | 104 | .874 | .889 | 106 | -2 | -1 | -7 |
| Mientkiewicz, Doug | NYY | AL | 1B | 48 | 36 | 330.1 | 353 | 14 | 2 | 46 | 59 | 47 | .797 | .842 | 50 | -3 | -2 | -9 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 1B | 21 | 17 | 155.1 | 161 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 42 | 32 | .762 | .842 | 35 | -3 | -3 | -25 |
| Matsui, Hideki | NYY | AL | LF | 68 | 67 | 586.1 | 131 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 152 | 127 | .836 | .872 | 132 | -5 | -5 | -11 |
| Jeter, Derek | NYY | AL | SS | 84 | 83 | 726.1 | 128 | 246 | 13 | 69 | 295 | 227 | .769 | .824 | 243 | -16 | -12 | -24 |
| Total | 678 | 601 | 5345.2 | 1765 | 748 | 42 | 261 | 1633 | 1370 | .839 | .840 | 1371 | -1 | -1 | -2 |
Legend
INN - Innings
PO - Putouts
A - Assists
E - Errors
DP - Double plays
Ch - Fieldable chances
PM - Plays made
ZR - Zone Rating
AvgZR - Average ZR
AvgPM - Average PM
Diff - PM minus AvgPM
RS - Runs saved
RS/162 - Runs saved pro-rated to 162 games
So yeah, Cano's been great. Also great, Alex Rodriguez, who has rebounded from two sub-par years at third after a solid 2004 defensively. Melky's flashing a plus glove in LF and CF and this doesn't even include his arm.
The rest of the numbers seem to match my observations pretty well, although I'd have pegged Abreu to be a little worse and Matsui to be a bit better. This is part of the reason I've grown fond of zone rating. It's freely available, it's easy to convert to runs, and for the most part the players I think are good and bad defenders show up as such in ZR.
These numbers are not meant to be an absolute assessment of either a players' defensive ability or value. First of all, we're dealing with a small sample size. The difference between Jeter being average or horrible is about one play a week. Second of all, as I've listed above, there are limitations in zone rating which need to be acknowledged and understood. Over at Bronx Banter the other day there was a heated discussion about defensive metrics and their pros and cons. The way I described it to someone over there is this. Let's say you have a group of hitters, and the only thing you know about him is their batting averages. Would you prefer to use your visual observations of the players' abilities and whether they have good at bats, or would you rather use batting average to determine their skill at least partially, even acknowledging that batting average has limitations? That's kind of where I think defensive metrics should fall into place.
For catchers, I use a combination of passed balls and stolen base percentage. It's not a great method because pitchers deserve some of the blame for stolen bases, but again, if we think of it in terms of value instead of ability it's better than nothing.
| NAME | GP | GS | INN | TC | PO | A | E | DP | FPCT | PB | SB | CS | CS% | CERA | RS | RS/150 |
| Jorge Posada, NYY | 77 | 68 | 621 | 427 | 394 | 30 | 3 | 2 | .993 | 3 | 61 | 19 | 0.24 | 4.42 | -3 | -7 |
| Wil Nieves, NYY | 21 | 18 | 142 | 105 | 99 | 5 | 1 | 1 | .990 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 0.23 | 4.12 | -1 | -5 |
| Josh Phelps, NYY | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Posada's defense has typically been average or slightly below, but he was great last year. He's back below average this year, but he's hitting more than well enough to compensate. Wil Nieves has a wonderful smile, which is apparently all he needs to have to be the Yankees' backup catcher.
With the pitching, offense and defense all assessed it's time to see where everyone on the Yankees ranks in terms of overall value, so here you go.
| Last | BR | DR | PR | TR |
| Rodriguez | 33 | 8 | 42 | |
| Wang | 18 | 18 | ||
| Posada | 19 | -3 | 16 | |
| Bruney | 8 | 8 | ||
| Cano | -2 | 10 | 8 | |
| Myers | 7 | 7 | ||
| Clemens | 6 | 6 | ||
| Matsui | 8 | -5 | 4 | |
| Rivera | 3 | 3 | ||
| Villone | 3 | 3 | ||
| Jeter | 15 | -12 | 2 | |
| Pettitte | 2 | 2 | ||
| Hughes | 2 | 2 | ||
| Britton | 2 | 2 | ||
| Giambi | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Proctor | 1 | 1 | ||
| Cabrera | -5 | 5 | 1 | |
| Mussina | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ramirez | 0 | 0 | ||
| Phillips | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Basak | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rasner | -1 | -1 | ||
| Thompson | -1 | 0 | -1 | |
| Pavano | -1 | -1 | ||
| Henn | -1 | -1 | ||
| Farnsworth | -1 | -1 | ||
| Bean | -2 | -2 | ||
| Wright | -3 | -3 | ||
| Vizcaino | -3 | -3 | ||
| Desalvo | -3 | -3 | ||
| Phelps | -3 | -1 | -4 | |
| Clippard | -4 | -4 | ||
| Karstens | -5 | -5 | ||
| Damon | -4 | -3 | -6 | |
| Cairo | -5 | -2 | -7 | |
| Abreu | -6 | -1 | -7 | |
| Nieves | -7 | -1 | -8 | |
| Mientkiewicz | -6 | -2 | -8 | |
| Igawa | -13 | -13 | ||
| Total | 38 | -6 | 15 | 47 |
BR = Batting runs
DR = Defensive runs
PR = Pitching runs
TR = Total runs
I'd take Bruney and Myers's high ranking with a big grain of salt. It may be better to use a linear weights type formula for relievers' value to the team since ERA or RA can hide their performances with inherited runners.
I was surprised to see that Cano's defense makes him such a plus contributor, but I guess that's the case at least by this methodology. If you want to get angry, you can figure out how much the "contributions" of Abreu, Mientkiewicz and Igawa have cost the team this year.
Monday, July 9, 2007
Yankee Pitching at the All Star Break
I'm still mad about Saturday's game, but we must soldier on I guess. Anyway, the All Star Break is a good time to catch up on the team's performances to this point. I think I've been neglecting pitching this season because of how much "fun" it's been harping on the offense and defense, so today I'm going to look at the pitching staff so far. First, here are the Yankees pitchers sorted by most valuable to least valuable by runs saved above average. Read after the chart for explanations of all the columns.| Last | RSAA | G | IP | Hit | HR | BB | K | ERA | RA | FIP | ERC | ERA+ |
| Wang | 18 | 15 | 104.3 | 98 | 6 | 27 | 48 | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.98 | 3.53 | 128 |
| Bruney | 8 | 39 | 35 | 28 | 2 | 25 | 27 | 2.57 | 2.57 | 4.69 | 3.70 | 168 |
| Myers | 7 | 41 | 31 | 27 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 5.04 | 3.57 | 165 |
| Clemens | 6 | 7 | 39.7 | 34 | 4 | 10 | 29 | 3.63 | 3.63 | 3.87 | 3.00 | 119 |
| Rivera | 3 | 32 | 34 | 33 | 3 | 5 | 32 | 3.71 | 3.71 | 3.15 | 3.09 | 116 |
| Villone | 3 | 14 | 19.3 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 3.26 | 3.26 | 3.78 | 2.28 | 132 |
| Pettitte | 2 | 20 | 112.3 | 127 | 8 | 34 | 62 | 4.25 | 4.73 | 4.00 | 4.40 | 102 |
| Hughes | 2 | 2 | 10.7 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 3.37 | 3.37 | 2.33 | 1.80 | 128 |
| Britton | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 5.67 | 0.91 | 240 |
| Proctor | 1 | 45 | 47.7 | 40 | 4 | 24 | 34 | 3.59 | 4.34 | 4.38 | 3.52 | 120 |
| Mussina | 0 | 14 | 78 | 83 | 10 | 17 | 49 | 4.62 | 4.85 | 4.37 | 4.37 | 93 |
| Ramirez | 0 | 2 | 2.3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.86 | 3.86 | 2.41 | 5.32 | 112 |
| Rasner | -1 | 6 | 24.7 | 29 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 4.01 | 5.11 | 5.70 | 5.12 | 108 |
| Pavano | -1 | 2 | 11.3 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4.76 | 5.56 | 4.24 | 3.86 | 91 |
| Henn | -1 | 17 | 19.3 | 16 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 4.66 | 5.12 | 5.28 | 3.62 | 93 |
| Farnsworth | -1 | 37 | 34.3 | 38 | 3 | 16 | 23 | 4.46 | 4.98 | 4.46 | 4.20 | 97 |
| Bean | -2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 6.93 | 8.16 | 36 |
| Wright | -3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7.88 | 7.88 | 12.14 | 9.85 | 55 |
| Vizcaino | -3 | 42 | 43 | 37 | 3 | 31 | 29 | 5.02 | 5.23 | 4.29 | 4.21 | 86 |
| Desalvo | -3 | 6 | 23 | 27 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 5.87 | 6.26 | 6.35 | 6.30 | 74 |
| Clippard | -4 | 6 | 27 | 29 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 6.33 | 6.33 | 6.60 | 5.81 | 68 |
| Karstens | -5 | 2 | 4.3 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 14.54 | 14.54 | 7.19 | 10.79 | 30 |
| Igawa | -13 | 9 | 46.7 | 52 | 11 | 23 | 33 | 7.14 | 7.33 | 6.59 | 5.84 | 60 |
| Total | 15 | 366.0 | 763.9 | 760 | 80 | 305 | 466 | 4.36 | 4.62 | 4.66 | 4.32 | 98 |
RSAA is runs saved above average, which I calculate by subracting the pitcher's runs allowed average from the league average runs allowed average, dividing by nine and then multiplying times innings pitched. Starters are compared to starters, relievers are compared to relievers, as relievers collectively have an RA of about .5 runs less than starters.
RA is just the equivalent of ERA, but includes unearned runs.
FIP is Tango Tiger's Fielding Independent Pitching, which is calculated using the formula 13 times HR plus 3 times BB + HBP - 2 times K divided by IP. 3.2 is added to that to give a # that should closely match ERA. The idea here is to regress a pitcher's batting average on balls in play to average by focusing on his peripherals. If you see a big difference between a pitcher's FIP and his ERA, you should expect them to move closer to each other if he continues to pitch the way he has to this point.
ERC is Component ERA. Kind of like FIP, it looks a player's components to see if their results match their actual performance. The one difference is it uses a pitcher's actual hit rate, so it does not penalize pitchers who do happen to have the ability to suppress hits on balls in play.
| Last | LD% | GB% | FB% | BABIP | HR+ | BB+ | K+ | BF | AB | AVG | OBP | SLG |
| Wang | 18.0% | 58.7% | 23.2% | .277 | 181 | 133 | 69 | 418 | 383 | .256 | .311 | .366 |
| Bruney | 17.5% | 29.9% | 52.9% | .268 | 200 | 53 | 105 | 154 | 122 | .230 | .364 | .328 |
| Myers | 15.7% | 61.8% | 22.1% | .238 | 113 | 93 | 60 | 131 | 114 | .237 | .313 | .368 |
| Clemens | 20.7% | 50.0% | 29.2% | .261 | 103 | 135 | 110 | 158 | 147 | .231 | .278 | .347 |
| Rivera | 16.3% | 53.1% | 30.6% | .309 | 120 | 238 | 138 | 139 | 130 | .254 | .288 | .346 |
| Villone | 16.4% | 36.1% | 47.7% | .217 | 203 | 111 | 69 | 78 | 69 | .203 | .282 | .261 |
| Pettitte | 18.4% | 49.3% | 32.3% | .321 | 155 | 120 | 78 | 476 | 434 | .293 | .340 | .417 |
| Hughes | 15.4% | 57.7% | 26.9% | .269 | inf | 88 | 161 | 41 | 37 | .189 | .268 | .216 |
| Britton | 14.3% | 28.6% | 57.1% | .000 | 44 | 146 | 71 | 17 | 16 | .063 | .118 | .250 |
| Proctor | 16.0% | 28.5% | 56.0% | .252 | 134 | 74 | 99 | 207 | 174 | .230 | .319 | .356 |
| Mussina | 20.6% | 39.9% | 39.5% | .295 | 85 | 164 | 90 | 326 | 298 | .279 | .316 | .446 |
| Ramirez | 0.0% | 66.7% | 25.0% | .500 | inf | 86 | 240 | 10 | 7 | .286 | .400 | .429 |
| Rasner | 20.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | .291 | 72 | 119 | 59 | 111 | 100 | .290 | .351 | .470 |
| Pavano | 17.9% | 46.2% | 34.9% | .282 | 119 | 197 | 52 | 46 | 44 | .273 | .304 | .409 |
| Henn | 13.6% | 42.4% | 44.1% | .237 | 114 | 58 | 89 | 88 | 73 | .219 | .341 | .343 |
| Farnsworth | 19.0% | 33.6% | 48.0% | .310 | 135 | 83 | 88 | 156 | 138 | .275 | .353 | .384 |
| Bean | 8.3% | 58.3% | 33.3% | .417 | inf | 33 | 63 | 19 | 14 | .357 | .526 | .500 |
| Wright | 14.3% | 25.0% | 58.7% | .217 | 21 | 57 | 90 | 40 | 34 | .294 | .400 | .794 |
| Vizcaino | 20.8% | 35.4% | 43.4% | .259 | 169 | 54 | 89 | 195 | 159 | .233 | .354 | .384 |
| Desalvo | 17.6% | 37.6% | 44.6% | .294 | 145 | 60 | 32 | 112 | 91 | .297 | .411 | .495 |
| Clippard | 6.7% | 39.3% | 54.3% | .277 | 54 | 62 | 87 | 124 | 107 | .271 | .371 | .505 |
| Karstens | 35.0% | 25.0% | 41.7% | .454 | 68 | 111 | 23 | 26 | 23 | .478 | .500 | .696 |
| Igawa | 18.7% | 31.0% | 50.5% | .283 | 51 | 80 | 92 | 215 | 189 | .275 | .363 | .519 |
| Total | 17.9% | 43.6% | 38.5% | .288 | 127 | 110 | 85 | 3287 | 2903 | .269 | .334 | .417 |
LD%, GB%, and FB% are the percentage of balls in play that a pitcher allows that end up as line drives, ground balls, or fly balls, respectively.
BABIP is batting average on balls in play. This looks at all balls in a play that a pitcher gives up and what ratio they become hits. The formula used is (H - HR) / (AB - HR - SO + SF). The AL average this season is .300 on the nose. In theory, most pitchers should be close to that number, so most anyone who's above or below it has a probability of regressing towards it.
HR+, BB+, and K+ are my own numbers. These are similar to Baseball Reference's ERA+, in that they calculate a pitcher's HR allowed rate, walk allowed rate, and strikeout rate per batters faced as a ratio compared to league average. < 100 is below average, >100 is above average for all three. So if you look at Chien-Ming Wang, you see he prevents HRs at a rate 81% better than the average pitcher, walks 33% fewer, and strikes out 31% fewer. You have to love Chase Wright's 21 HR+.
BF is batters faced. AB is at bats by opposing hitters, and AVG, OBP, and SLG are what opposing hitters are hitting against the pitcher in question.
So what do all these numbers really mean?
First of all, Chien-Ming Wang rocks. He's been a win better than any Yankee pitcher despite missing a month. Yeah, he doesn't strike out a lot of people, but last year his K+ was 51, so he's improved significantly in that area this year. He's a master at keeping the ball in the park, and he pitches with good control. That has worked for Wang for 439 innings at the major league level now.
Brian Bruney's had a decent year as far as preventing runs, but his control is awful and he appears to have fallen out of favor in the bullpen pecking order. Bruney was released by Arizona for a reason, but he's still young enough to put it together. I wouldn't trust him over most of the rest of the pen right now though.
Mike Myers' has had what looks like a good year superficially, but he has failed at his job, which is to get out lefty hitters. Lefties are hitting .327/.410/.462, following up a line of .257/.297/.443 last year. Expect more of the same going forward. From what I can see, he's lost what little velocity he had and his slider is not as tough to hit as it used to be.
It's both a credit to Roger Clemens and an indictment of the rest of the team that he's been their fourth most valuable pitcher despite only starting six games. He's not throwing as hard as he used to, but he's succeeding. His K rate is still better than league average, and he's combining that with above average control and a good HR rate. He can probably pitch until he's 50.
Mariano Rivera's ERA is way out of line from what we are used to seeing, but he's been good recently. Over his last 24 games, he's pitched 27.1 innings and fanned 24 with a more Mo-like 1.65 ERA. He still doesn't look like MO to me, but he should be good going forward. His FIP and his component ERA both point to that as well. Interestingly, Rivera's already given up as many earned runs this year as he gave up in five full seasons in the past.
Everyone wants to dump Ron Villone, but he's been good at his role, pitching good baseball in low leverage spots. I don't see a pressing need to get rid of him. I'd probably lose Myers before Villone.
Andy Pettitte has been brutal his last few starts, but you could argue that it should have been seen coming. He had a 2.51 ERA after his first 11 starts, but 23 BB and just 38 strikeouts, and having allowed 70 hits in 71 innings. Since then, he's got a putrid 7.30 ERA. For the first half overall, he's been a hair above average, and he's eaten innings for the team and helped rest the pen for the majority of his starts. He's right around where he was projected to be overall, even though he took a circuitous rout to get there. Let's hope he's just in a rut and not hurting.
Phil Hughes pitched twice. We hope to see him back by the end of the month. He makes his first rehab start today I think.
Chris Britton has done nothing in the majors or Scranton to warrant still being in Scranton.
Scott Proctor's been up and down. It looks like he's made an adjustment recently, using his slow curve to freeze hitters looking for his fastball, and so far it's working. As a durable reliever who can give the team average or better innings, he's a useful piece.
Mike Mussina started out crappy. He still doesn't look great stuff wise, but he's been getting results. Over his last six starts he's got a 2.87 ERA, over his last eight it's 3.49. Take out his first start of the year and he's got an ERA of 4.14. I was hoping for a repeat of 2006, but it looks more that we will see the 2004-2005 version of Moose, who is useful if not great. Moose's FIP and ERC seem to agree that he'll be ok going forward, but not great.
Edwar Ramirez is the last of the Yankee pitchers who has not been below average. He should get a few chances to show if he can handle the majors yet. He's a great story so I'll be pulling for him.
I won't go through everyone else on the list, but I'll touch on a few of 'em.
Pavano. Heh.
I have nothing good to say about Kyle Farnsworth. I'd love to see the Yankees dump him somewhere, for anything they could get.
Luis Vizcaino has been the best part of the Randy Johnson trade, which tells you how well that whole thing worked out. In his defense, he's pitched better of late although he's still got mediocre peripherals. Did you know Vizcaino already has 11 IBB this year? That really skews his numbers.
Kei Igawa. I expected a 5.00 ERA with hopes of a 4.00, and instead I've gotten a 7.14 ERA with hopes that he doesn't pitch any more. Igawa's K rate is passable, but his control has been poor, and his HR rate is off the charts bad. The league is hitting .275/.363/.519 against him. Eeesh.
Overall, the Yankee pitching staff has actually been a touch above average (15 RSAA overall). That's because even with a slightly below average ERA, they have allowed fewer unearned runs than average so fewer overall. Their team RA is 4.66 compared to the AL average of 4.80. That's the fairly good news. The bad news is that as a team they have the worst K rate in the league, with a K+ of 85.
I'll look at either the offense or defense tomorrow.
Update: A couple of links some of you may have interest in. Over at the Hardball Times, Chris Jaffe looks at a simulation of the 28 worst teams of all time. I helped Chris run these. No, the 2007 Yankees are not on the list, yet.
Also, Top Prospect Alert has posted their Top 100 prospects at midseason. Hughes is still considered a prospect, and they have him as #2 behind Justin Upton. Six Yankees make the grade, although one name is a bit surprising.
Monday, June 18, 2007
The Surge
I'm a bad Yankee fan. On May 28, the Yankees fell to 21-28 and I wrote them off. They lost the next game to fall to 21-29. Since then, the Yanks have played 17 games, and won 14 of them, moving themselves from 14.5 games back of the AL East division lead and 8.5 games back of the wild card lead to 8.5 games back in the AL East, and 3.5 games back in the wild card.How have they been doing it? It's a team effort, on offense, on defense, and with the pitching.
Here's how the offense has performed since May 30, sorted by batting runs by linear weights above average. These are not position-adjusted, but are compared to the league average for all players. Players are sorted from most to least valuable.
| Player | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RB | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BR +/- |
| Rodriguez, Alex | 77 | 60 | 22 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 29 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 1 | .383 | .494 | .850 | 1.344 | 12 |
| Abreu, Bobby | 75 | 59 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | .407 | .533 | .678 | 1.211 | 9 |
| Cano, Robinson | 73 | 67 | 10 | 23 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | .343 | .397 | .567 | .964 | 4 |
| Posada, Jorge | 69 | 59 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 15 | 1 | 0 | .305 | .377 | .559 | .936 | 4 |
| Jeter, Derek | 79 | 69 | 18 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 0 | .319 | .392 | .493 | .885 | 3 |
| Matsui, Hideki | 76 | 65 | 13 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 1 | .338 | .408 | .477 | .885 | 2 |
| Cabrera, Melky | 70 | 60 | 10 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 1 | .300 | .357 | .417 | .774 | 0 |
| Mientkiewicz, Doug | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .333 | .333 | .333 | .667 | 0 |
| Giambi, Jason | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .250 | .200 | .250 | .450 | 0 |
| Cairo, Miguel | 48 | 44 | 5 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 1 | .295 | .313 | .364 | .676 | 0 |
| Damon, Johnny | 70 | 64 | 9 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | .250 | .314 | .391 | .705 | -1 |
| Nieves, Wil | 13 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .167 | .231 | .167 | .397 | -1 |
| Phelps, Josh | 29 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | .231 | .310 | .231 | .541 | -2 |
| Total | 690 | 595 | 121 | 190 | 41 | 5 | 21 | 112 | 72 | 98 | 19 | 6 | .319 | .394 | .511 | .905 | 29 |
Almost everyone on the team has been average or above, but it's been the A-Rod and Abreu show. After a down May, Alex Rodriguez is on fire. For all the talk about how Johnny Damon has been hitting better as a DH, he really hasn't been that good. The big thing is that the whole team is hitting fairly consistently overall. Even Miguel Cairo hasn't been horrendous, although the more he plays the more he's going to cost the team on offense, and I say this as one of his biggest fans. Overall, they're 29 runs above average over the last 17 games on offense.
Of course, we all know that pitching wins championships™. Not really, but it sure helps. Here's how the pitching staff has done so far. RSAA is runs saved above average, which is simply the difference between how many runs a pitcher has given up compared to what an average pitcher would have in the same number of innings (earned and unearned runs). FIP is Fielding Independent Pitching ERA, which regresses a pitcher's non HR hits to average in an attempt to remove the factors out of their control. It's a good way to see if a pitcher is over or under-performing their peripherals and what we should expect from them going forward.
| Player | GS | GF | W | L | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | ERA | FIP | BB/9 | HR/9 | K/9 | RSAA |
| Wang, Chien-Ming | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 30.3 | 27 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 2.08 | 3.20 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 5.0 | 9 |
| Myers, Mike | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5.7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.9 | 3 |
| Rivera, Mariano | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 9.3 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 8.7 | 3 |
| Vizcaino, Luis | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 1.35 | 3.35 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 3 |
| Mussina, Mike | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18.7 | 19 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 3.86 | 4.65 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 5.8 | 2 |
| Clemens, Roger | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12.3 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 3.65 | 2.55 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 10.9 | 2 |
| Henn, Sean | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 5.70 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 1 |
| Pettitte, Andy | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.3 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 4.43 | 3.74 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 1 |
| Britton, Chris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3.00 | 6.87 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1 |
| Bruney, Brian | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 4.50 | 7.87 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Farnsworth, Kyle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 5.14 | 3.20 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 0 |
| Proctor, Scott | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.3 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 2.61 | 2.81 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 0 |
| Villone, Ron | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13.50 | 12.70 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | -2 |
| DeSalvo, Matt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13.50 | 7.70 | 6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -2 |
| Clippard, Tyler | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17.0 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 7.94 | 7.44 | 7.4 | 2.1 | 5.8 | -6 |
| Total | 17 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 152.0 | 152 | 68 | 64 | 14 | 54 | 111 | 3.79 | 4.16 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 6.6 | 13 |
We all love Wang. Despite being the biggest fluke ever, he has been the Yankees most valuable pitcher since May 30, and last night he put on a clinic. He threw one changeup to Jose Reyes that Reyes fell over trying to hit, and did a masterful job of mixing in his secondary pitches last night, fanning a career-high 10 in the process. Roger Clemens followed up an ok start against Pittsburgh with a better one against a better team on Friday. RLYW whipping boy Luis Vizcaino has been outstanding of late, showing more life on his fastball and slider and has fanned 7 in 6.2 innings. The BB rate is still high, but he's working around that. The only pitchers who have been below average are Matt DeSalvo, Tyler Clippard, and Ron Villone. DeSalvo and Clippard have been optioned back to Scranton, and Villone's relegated to extreme mopup. Overall Yankee pitchers have saved 13 runs above average over the last 17 games.
The Yankees' defense has been a sore spot for most of the last few years. However, even that's been doing well over this recent stretch.
| Player | Pos | G | GS | Ch | INN | PO | A | E | DP | ZR | PM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Cano, Robinson | 2B | 17 | 17 | 53 | 151 | 35 | 58 | 0 | 17 | .906 | 48 | 5 | 4 | 35 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | 3B | 15 | 15 | 45 | 139 | 12 | 29 | 1 | 3 | .778 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Cairo, Miguel | SS | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 72 |
| Damon, Johnny | CF | 3 | 3 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .900 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Cabrera, Melky | CF | 15 | 13 | 37 | 129 | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .892 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Basak, Chris | 3B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 92 |
| Cabrera, Melky | RF | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Abreu, Bobby | RF | 16 | 15 | 32 | 143 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .875 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cairo, Miguel | 3B | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | .667 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -36 |
| Cairo, Miguel | 1B | 9 | 7 | 22 | 76 | 76 | 6 | 0 | 10 | .818 | 18 | -1 | -1 | -10 |
| Matsui, Hideki | LF | 16 | 16 | 37 | 151 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .838 | 31 | -1 | -1 | -8 |
| Mientkiewicz, Doug | 1B | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 6 | .500 | 2 | -2 | -1 | -102 |
| Phelps, Josh | 1B | 10 | 7 | 9 | 56 | 52 | 4 | 2 | 6 | .667 | 6 | -2 | -1 | -35 |
| Jeter, Derek | SS | 16 | 15 | 57 | 142 | 26 | 48 | 3 | 15 | .754 | 43 | -3 | -2 | -24 |
| Total | 16 | 16 | 313 | 1056 | 330 | 153 | 8 | 58 | .827 | 259 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
| Player | G | GS | INN | PO | A | E | PB | SBA | CS | CS% | CERA | RS | RS/162 |
| Nieves | 4 | 4 | 33 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 4.64 | -1 | -32 |
| Posada | 14 | 13 | 119 | 95 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 3 | 18.8% | 3.55 | -2 | -22 |
| Total | 18 | 17 | 152 | 122 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 15.0% | 3.79 | -3 | -25 |
Robinson Cano has disappointed on offense this year, but his defense as tracked by ZR has been outstanding. Over the last 17 games he's saved 4 runs above average, which would be the equivalent of saving 35 runs over a full season. To my eye, Miguel Cairo's defense at first has been much better than reflected in his ZR. The main thing is that overall, the team is playing close to average defense to support the pitching staff. The catchers haven't been very good defensively, but Posada and Nieves have combined for 82 hits and 22 doubles this year, so that's something.
The numbers above have led to the Yankees having a run differential of 121 runs scored and 68 allowed. That translates to a pythagorean record of 12-5, but they've gone 14-3 instead. So we can add at least some good fortune into the mix as well.
| Standings | W | L | RS | RA | WPct |
| Actual | 14 | 3 | 121 | 68 | 0.824 |
| Pythag | 12 | 5 | 121 | 68 | 0.742 |
Add it all up, and you have a team that's been on fire. They still have a lot of ground to make up, but I'll have an updated look at their playoff odds tomorrow.
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Looking Ahead to 2007: The Yankee Bullpen
Opening Day is less than just around the corner, so it’s time to wrap up my 2007 Yankees previews with a look at the Yankee bullpen. Last year, Yankee relievers pitched a total of 510 innings, and ended up being about 3 runs above average collectively as a group. The bulk of that was the performance of the incomparable Mariano Rivera and Scott Proctor finally getting results that matched his talent.
This year’s collection of bullpen arms has quite a bit of promise, but just like it has since 1996, it starts with The Sandman.
Mariano Rivera had another outstanding season in a career full of outstanding seasons. Over the last four seasons, Rivera’s ERA has not topped 2. In 303 innings, he has an ERA of 1.69. There were two minor issues in 2006 that might be of some concern going forward. The first was a drop in his K rate. Rivera’s K rate dropped from 80 in 78.3 innings in 2005 to 55 in 75 innings. Rivera’s K rate has fluctuated throughout his career, so I don’t think is a huge issue.
The other issue was some elbow soreness that he had at the tail end of the season. Rivera eventually recovered after some time off and pitched well at the end of the season, and so far this spring he’s been outstanding, so this is also a minor concern.
Rivera is difficult to project accurately. Projection systems are designed to work with the aggregrate population of baseball players, but Rivera is unique. He’s consistently outperformed the league with regards to his batting average against on balls in play. He controls the HR better than most pitchers when you compare his ratio of HRs/flyball to other pitchers.
Rivera’s projections for 2007 are still solid.
Rivera’s 2006 was worth 23 runs above average. Most of the projection systems predict a falloff(except ZiPS), but as I stated above that’s at least partly because of how hard it is to predict someone like Rivera. That being said, Mo is 37, and at some point he’s going to start slowing down.
This spring, camp started with noise about Rivera testing free agency. Part of that was surely the emotional response to seeing Bernie Williams not being brought back. With his new changeup, and playing for his next and perhaps final contract, I think Rivera is primed for yet another excellent season. If that happens, the Yankees will pay him what he is worth, and hopefully we’ll get to see Rivera closing games in the new Yankee Stadium.
In 2006, Kyle Farnsworth showed why he drove Cubs fans nuts for years. When Farnsworth is on his game, you wonder how anyone ever hits him. Unfortunately, too often he was either not on his game, or fighting a balky back and unable to pitch. Farnsworth still delivered one of the most enjoyable moments of the season, when he worked out of a bases loaded jam (induced by his own crappy control) to catch David Ortiz looking at a full count slider with two outs and the bases loaded and the Yankees up by two in Fenway.
Farnsworth’s not a lights-out reliever like Tom Gordon was. He’ll have his moments, good and bad, and may not be the primary setup man in 2007 depending on how the people behind end up performing. Here are Farnsworth’s projections for 2007.
Last year, Farnsworth’s 4.64 RA was exactly average for a reliever, so he was average overall. Farnsworth projects to be a bit better than that this year. He has the talent to be even better than that, and the inconsistency to be worse. Like most Yankee fans, I’ll be holding my breath whenever he comes in.
One of the biggest stories of 2006 had to be the emergence of Scott Proctor. Acquired in the Robin Ventura trade of 2003, Proctor has always had a good fastball, but bad command and mediocre secondary pitches had led to him being tatooed in the Yankee pen in 2004 and 2005. Proctor wasn’t expected to make the team out of spring training until injuries got him on the roster. After a rough debut, losing a game in Oakland, Proctor became one of the most valuable Yankee relievers. He pitched often, and pitched well. Like many, I felt he was being overused, and I also felt he was pitching over his head. However, he actually improved as the season went on.
Last year was way out of line from everything in Proctor’s prior performance history, which is reflected in his 2007 projections.
Projecting pitchers is often an exercise in futility. In the case of someone like Proctor, it’s tough to know how much of last year was a fluke, and how much of it was a genuine change in his talent/ability. We won’t know that until we see more. Proctor’s looked outstanding this spring, and I’m starting to think he’s at least somewhat for real. Even if he falls back towards his projections, he should be a useful part of the pen in 2007.
Luis Vizcaino seems like a decent middle reliever, but I doubt he’ll be much more than that. Historically, he’s exhibited a reverse platoon split.
vs LH: .229/.310/.400
vs RH: .249/.321/.427
He projects to be around average, which is fine.
I can’t shake this feeling that Vizcaino = Felix Rodriguez, but hopefully it turns out better than that.
Mike Myers was supposed to be the Yankees’ answer to David Ortiz. Not only did that not work out, but Myers was actually better against righties last year. There’s a lot of noise in a single year’s splits, so I’d expect Myers to revert to form this year.
When projecting Myers, you have to remember that he’s a tactical option, and shouldn’t really be assessed in terms of his overall production towards preventing runs. Myers is in the last year of a two year deal, and I’d imagine that if he doesn’t do the one thing he was brought in to do early on, he may get buried in the back of the pen or even released.
Brian Bruney throws gas. Unfortunately, it doesn’t often go where he wants it to go. Bruney’s still pretty young, and has been pretty nasty this spring, fanning 14 in seven innings, with just two walks to go with it. His control keeps him from projecting very well.
Bruney’s the wild card in the pen to me. He could end up being the second best reliever in the pen if it clicks for him. Even if it doesn’t, there’s nothing wrong with having inconsistent guys who can strike people out around in the pen. If I had to pick one guy who could blow his projections away on the pitching staff this year, it’d be Bruney.
Ron Villone may or may not be a Yankee this year. Most of you know the deal with Villone. Great first half, horrible second half. Whether it was overuse or regressing back towards his mean, the real Villone is probably somewhere in the middle. I don’t think Villone has any upside, but you could do worse with a long reliever/mop up guy.
Villone’s looked lousy this spring. He may not have anything left.
If Villone doesn’t make the Yankees, it’ll likely be because Sean Henn does. Henn’s been in the Yankee organization for what seems like decades, and has been fighting his way back from a pretty severe arm injury and surgery a few years ago. Henn used to deal in the high 90s, but now he’s more of a lows 90s guy. He hasn’t impressed in his brief major league stints, but a move to the pen may end up helping him find his niche.
Henn doesn’t project as well as Villone for 2007, but sometimes you have to balance the needs of the present with planning for the future. Is the .5 difference in projected ERA really worth not finding out what you have in Henn for future? Henn will be 26 in April, it’s probably time to give him a shot or let him go. With the news that he has a fourth option year, he also gives the Yankees roster flexibility, something that has often been an issue for the team.
The Yankees used the theory of sunk cost to acquire Chris Britton from the Orioles after picking up the option on Jaret Wright’s 2007 contract. Britton had a decent season with Baltimore last year, but I have this nagging concern that Orioles fans didn’t seem to care that he got traded. He’s not a particularly hard-thrower, but works in the low 90s, and looks like he’ll start the year in the minors after a shaky spring. He should get some innings this year and projects pretty well if he does.
Britton’s struggled this spring, which has helped make the decision to farm him out easier.
Although he may start his season in the rotation, I’m listing Jeff Karstens in the bullpen since if all goes well, he’ll be a long relief candidate. That’s not a slight on Karstens, but if the Yankees plans go well, he’s just not as likely to be good as any of the projected starting five.
Karstens looked much better than the guy who finished 2006 this spring until his last two starts. He had better velocity (91-92 on his fastball, compared to high 80s last year), seemed to have a sharper hook, and he was getting more grounders. While I think making judgements based on spring training stats is not smart, visual observations of players (especially pitchers) can be pretty useful. I like Karstens a lot more this year than I did last year, and it’s primarily because his stuff now looks like it’s major league quality. The elbow issue he’s having now complicates any assessment of him.
It’s tough to know if the Karstens we saw most of the spring just reverted to form recently, or if the stiff elbow was to blame. His projections seem harsh, but Karstens did have a 4.28 ERA in AAA last year, although he was outstanding after a rough start. I think Karstens will be useful reliever/spot starter this year, and am cautiously optimistic that he will exceed his projections.
Last on the list, Darrell Rasner. See Jeff Karstens. As far as I’m concerned, they’re basically interchangeable, and will probably get moved up and down as needed all year.
Rasner projects a bit better than Karstens, but Karstens seems to have the organization’s attention more than Rasner.
So what do all the numbers and projections mean? Here’s a comparison of last year’s pitching staff to this year’s projections. I adjusted the innings totals of some of the pitchers to try and make them line up with last year.
Despite pessimistic projections for Chien-Ming Wang and Mike Mussina relative to last season, improved depth replacing some really bad contributions by Aaron Small, Shawn Chacon, and others should put the team in a position to end up with a better overall pitching staff. The rotation isn’t spectacular, but it should be solid enough to get through the regular season. Whether they’ll be pitching well when October starts is the $190 million question.
So, with all the previewing out of the way, let’s see where the Yankees end up. When I looked at the Yankee bench I summed up the projections for the position players on offense and defense. They came out to 142 runs above average on offense, and 32 runs below average on defense. Add in the pitching staff’s projected 44 runs above average, and the team ends up at 156 runs above average.
So they project to be about 16 wins above an average team, or a 97 win team overall. You can knock off a couple of wins if you want to add in some more replacement level pitching, but this is still a damn good team. If Phil Hughes and/or Roger Clemens replace some of the worse innings in the projections above, they could be even better than that. Should be a fun season, and it’s only three days away.
Cheap Plug Alert: I wrote an article for the Hardball Times previewing five questions that will tell the tale of the Yankees in 2007.
Breaking News: Abraham - Yankees Set Roster From Peter Abraham’s great Yankee blog:
LHP Sean Henn, C Wil Nieves and 1B Josh Phelps are on the team.
No word on yet on the No. 5 starter other than that
RHP Jeff Karstens is headed to the DL.
NJ.com - Yankees: Phelps’ chance has come, but Villone may go
TAMPA, Fla.—Josh Phelps has apparently won a spot on the Yankees roster. Andy Phillips, who had been competing with Phelps to platoon at first base with Doug Mientkiewicz, yesterday was placed on outright waivers. The move (which was revealed by a major-league official who asked not to be identified because waivers are confidential)
means that by tomorrow Phillips will be claimed by another team or sent to the minors by the Yankees. Meanwhile, lefty reliever Ron Villone might have clinched his fate last night by failing to retire any of the three men he faced in a 12-2 loss to the Houston Astros.
The roster is tightening up. While I’m happy to see Phelps make the team, I do feel for Andy Phillips. I hope Phillips does get claimed and gets a chance to play in the majors somewhere. I still think he may have a chance at being a productive player, but I don’t the Yankees are in the position to wait for it to happen.
Ron Villone looks shot. It would seem that Sean Henn’s going to get the spot that was supposed to go to Villone, and I think that’s a good move as well.
I’ll wrap up the looking ahead pieces with the bullpen tomorrow.
Friday, December 8, 2006
Yankees.com - Villone declines Yanks’ arbitration offer
Ron Villone declined the Yankees’ arbitration offer Thursday, leaving the left-hander available on the free-agent market.
Villone, who returned Thursday from a 12-day vacation in Italy, spoke with his agent, Scott Boras, before making his decision. Villone has drawn interest from five or six teams, several of which may be willing to give the reliever a two-year contract.
I wouldn’t mind bringing Villone back for one year, but if he can get a better offer somewhere the Yankees get a sandwich pick in the draft. That’s good, but it then puts them in a position where they’re going to need to get a second lefty for the pen, unless they think Sean Henn can do the job (which I think is pretty unlikely).
No news on Andy Pettitte, or the exciting hunt for a backup catcher and utility infielder. The Yankees did make some news when they selected Josh Phelps in the Rule 5 draft. Phelps had a solid season in AAA Toledo this year, hitting .308/.370/.532. His ZiPS projection for 2007 is .279/.338/.486. Unfortunately, Phelps is a butcher with the glove. He’s played only 31 games at 1B in his career, and has a career zone rating of .744. That is actually better than Jason Giambi’s .722 last year, but would equate to about a -18 over a full season. He probably doesn’t replace Andy Phillips on the roster, but he could be useful as a backup DH against lefties and an occasional game at 1B. He does have a background as a catcher, although he hasn’t played there in years so that’s probably not a viable option for him either.
One interesting name did pop up yesterday as a potential backup catcher. Jim Leyritz is talking about making a comeback. He’ll be 42 and hasn’t played in six years. In this market that’s probably worth $4 million.
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Run Values of the 2006 Yankees
With the Yankees’ 2006 season at its end, I wanted to take one last look back at the contributions of everyone who wore pinstripes this season. I posted the details of a lot of these calculations in this entry a while back, so if you want more background you can check that out.
First up, the offense.
Next up, the defense.
Lastly, the pitching.
Add it all up, and here’s the sum total of everyone’s contributions to the Yankees in 2006.
Do these numbers make sense? The Yankees were 167 runs better than an average team, or 16.7 wins better. Add 16.7 wins to an 81 win team, you get a 97.8 win team. I guess they do.
In other Yankee news, Joe Torre is staying.
Monday, October 2, 2006
ALDS Preview - Tigers vs. Yankees
It’s ALDS preview time, as the Yankees will be taking on Detroit Tuesday night on FOX at 8 PM.
First up, here is a look at the position players on the 25 man playoff rosters. As I am wont to do, I’m using linear weights for offense and zone rating converted to runs for defense. BR is the player’s total output above/below average on the season compared to others listed at the same position. DR are the defensive runs above/below average. For the bench players who played multiple positions, I’ve combined all their defensive numbers.
I’ve combined the lines for players who played for multiple teams. I’ve removed the defensive stats of Marcus Thames and Jason Giambi as their primary roles will be as DH. Matt Stairs was acquired post Sept 1 so I don’t think he can be on the Tigers’ post-season roster.
As you can see from this list, Detroit’s is a much better defensive team than the Yankees, but overall they’re not on the same level. The Yankees have the edge on a per game basis at C, 1B, 2B, LF, CF, RF, and DH, and the difference between Derek Jeter and Carlos Guillen is basically negligible. They Yankees have 8 of the top 9 players as far as total run value per game (based on this season’s performance).
The Tigers’ starting nine hit .280/.337/.458 compared to a league average of .275/.338/.437. It should be noted that they play in a pitcher’s park, so this is not a bad overall line for them. As a team overall, their season OPS was 100, or exactly league average. The starting nine put up an OPS of around 105. That’s around what Mike Lowell hit this season.
On the Tigers bench, they don’t pack much offensive punch, although Chris Shelton may get a start against Randy Johnson in Game 3.
The Yankees’ starting nine hit .299/.392/.499, which is the equivalent of an OPS of 129. That’s around what Miguel Tejada had, with a bit less batting average and bit more OBP.
The Yankee bench isn’t too bad this season for once, although I’m not sure how much time they’ll get. Bernie would seem to be a good pinch-hitter against a lefty, but which lefty do you pinch hit for? Melky Cabrera will be there to back up all three OF and perhaps to spot Matsui for defense late in games. That is the right role for him. Matsui is right now the clearly superior player. Miguel Cairo will mainly just be around in case of an emergency, and I’d guess we’ll see Andy Phillips replacing Sheffield in the 8th and 9th innings for defense. Hopefully, Sal Fasano doesn’t get an AB.
On paper, it’s a pretty clear position player edge for the Yanks.
Of course, there’s the matter of pitching. First, a look at the starters. I’m using linear weights for the pitchers as well.
One thing about the chart above, I’m only using the pitchers’ numbers as starters.
In Game 1, the Yankees seem to have a fairly good-sized edge. Chien-Ming Wang has been better than Nate Robertson in most measures this season except for strikeout rate. His ERC (component ERA) also indicates that his success to this point hasn’t been fluky. I remain concerned about Wang’s workload on the season, as he’s thrown 218 innings this season after never topping 160 prior to this year, but I think/hope he’ll be fine.
Robertson’s a pretty good pitcher, and a fellow blogger, so I have a soft spot for him. Being left-handed is a slight advantage for him facing Abreu, Giambi, Cano, and Damon. I think he’ll pitch reasonably well, but I doubt he’ll shut the Yankees down completely or anything.
Game 2 seems like a very big edge for the Yankees by the numbers, but you never know with rookie pitchers that throw 100 mph. Justin Verlander’s been solid for Detroit, and was rated as the AL starter with the highest average fastball velocity this season by Basebll Info Solutions. Fatigue seems to have caught up with him a bit recently, and Jim Leyland had him skip a start to rest him a bit. He has the stuff to dominate, although his BB rate is a touch below average which would seem to be a benefit for the Yankees.
Mike Mussina started the season out great, but has faltered a bit lately. He typically pitches well in the postseason, and his last start was very impressive (particularly his velocity, which was up to 91-92). I think Moose will be fine.
Game 3 is about as big of a tossup as you can get. Kenny Rogers didn’t face the Yankees this season, but had a solid season, and amazingly did not push any cameramen. He’s a lefty nibbler who has had pretty good control and a good HR rate but doesn’t have much stuff. I think the Yankees could light him up.
Unfortunately, with Randy Johnson opposing him, they may have to. Johnson’s got a herniated disk and had an epidural to relieve the pain he was feeling. In some ways, the fact that there is a physical explanation for Johnson’s recent struggles is encouraging. The problem is if the epidural was done too late to rectify it. Johnson supposedly had a good BP session and is on target to pitch this game. He could be great, or he could be shelled. Hopefully the Yanks are up 2-0 when he pitches.
Johnson’s had an odd season. If you look at his component ERA (3.80), he’s been solid. The problem he’s had is the hits and walks and HRs he’s allowed have not come scattered, but tend to come in bunches, something ignored when looking a pitcher’s peripherals. This is very likely a manifestation of his health issues, and probably likely to continue.
If Game 4 is needed, it’ll be Jeremy Bonderman vs. Jaret Wright. If Game 4 is needed, the Yankees may be in trouble. Bonderman’s another guy with a lot of talent who has tired in the season’s homestretch, but he’s a lot better than Wright.
That’s a little harsh-sounding on Wright, who did a serviceable job this season and ended up a touch about average. His peripherals indicate that it’s not likely to continue, but he was an important part of the rotation this season and was useful, even if he’s a bit painful to watch at times.
And if Game 5 is needed, it’ll be a rematch of Game 1.
So the Yankees seem to have a slight edge in the starting pitching with 3 out of 5 matchups being favorable, which is a bit surprising honestly. How about the bullpen?

Joel Zumaya has been dominant out of Detroit’s pen, but that below average walk rate seems to scream out as an advantage for the Yankees. Baseball Info Solutions rated him as the hardest throwing pitcher in baseball, with an average fastball velocity of 98 MPH.
Fernando Rodney’s been pretty solid as well. His season has been remarkably similar to Scott Proctor’s, minus 20 appearances.
It’s a rare bullpen where the closer is probably the third or fourth worst option, but that’s where Todd Jones sits.
The Tigers also have two solid lefties in Jamie Walker and Wil Ledezma, who will be used in key spots to try and neutralize the Giambi/Abreu/Matsui/Cano/Damon contingent, which makes it imperative for Joe Torre to keep the lefties as separated as possible in the lineup. Zach Miner and Jason Grilli will round out the pen. Despite appearing in the chart above, Andrew Miller will not be a part of Detroit’s bullpen.
The Detroit pen as listed above (minus Miller) has held opposing hitters to a line of .230/.308/.350, and saved 44 runs above average. This is the biggest strength on the team, and their only statistical advantage over the Yankees.
The Yankee bullpen starts and ends at the top, with Mariano Rivera. He appears to be healthy heading into the postseason, and he has had a lot of rest and has proclaimed that he is ready to do whatever is needed (pitch on back-to-back days, pitch two innings). He may have to, because the bridge to him is shaky.
Scott Proctor had a great season as the most used reliever in the American League(holy crap, Salomon Torres pitched in 94 games???). At this point, he’s probably the Yankees second best reliever as long as he’s got some juice left in his arm. Proctor pitched in 16 games in September, and pitched well, posting a 1.65 ERA over 16.1 innings, walking 3, and fanning 14, so if he’s tired, it’s not showing.
Someone on the Nomaas discussion board has coined Kyle Farnsworth “It is high, it is Far-nsworth”. I can’t disagree with that. At times he’s unhittable, at other times he scares the crap out of me. While I don’t think his past post-season results indicate some inability to pitch in the playoffs, I think his general inconsistency might. I guess we’ll find out, but I’m not looking forward to it.
Brian Bruney brings a great fastball and bad command as the fourth RHP in the pen. Thankfully, patience is not a strength of the Tigers.
The Yankee pen is rounded out with Ron Villone, who had a great first half that led to many(including yours truly) whining about his lack of use, and an awful August and September that led to the same many (including yours truly) whining about him being used all the time. I think he’s on the roster as more of a reward for a solid half season, and less in a role where he’ll be expected to get many key outs. Detroit’s heavily right-handed, so the Yankees don’t need to worry about platoon advantages when they have Mike Myers on hand. Myers had a reverse platoon split this year, but I’m not ready to think that those 132 batters faced are more meaningful than the 2008 he had faced prior to this season. He’ll likely be asked to come in to get Sean Casey or Curtis Granderson out, and that’s about it. Cory Lidle will sit in the pen as well, in case any of the starters gets bombed.
All these numbers seem to indicate a classic mismatch. I’m not ready to go that far. Detroit’s a good team in a great baseball town. They led arguably the toughest division in baseball almost all season. They’re not just the team that went 26-30 over their last 56 games, they’re also the team that went 71-35 over their first 106.
This is an organization that lost 119 games just three seasons ago. Their turnaround has been remarkable and a credit to all involved. I think they can beat the Yankees, and I wouldn’t take them lightly. A great defensive team loaded with hard throwers can beat anyone if things break right.
But I don’t think they will. Yankees in four.
Peter Abraham posted the Game 1 lineup on his fine blog.
Johnny Damon CF
Derek Jeter SS
Bobby Abreu RF
Gary Sheffield 1B
Jason Giambi DH
Alex Rodriguez 3B
Hideki Matsui LF
Jorge Posada C
Robinson Cano 2B
Rodriguez 6th? Interesting.
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Yankees.com: Torre sets postseason roster
NEW YORK—Joe Torre settled on his 25-man roster for the American League Division Series, choosing Andy Phillips and Miguel Cairo to round out his bench.
In addition, Torre announced that Brian Bruney would be the final man in the bullpen, as the Yankees will take 11 pitchers into the opening round of the postseason.
New York will take seven infielders (Gary Sheffield, Jason Giambi, Robinson Cano, Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez, Cairo and Phillips), two catchers (Jorge Posada and Sal Fasano) and five outfielders (Hideki Matsui, Johnny Damon, Bobby Abreu, Bernie Williams and Melky Cabrera).
The 11 pitchers will be Chien-Ming Wang, Mike Mussina, Randy Johnson, Jaret Wright, Cory Lidle, Ron Villone, Bruney, Mike Myers, Scott Proctor, Kyle Farnsworth and Mariano Rivera. If Johnson’s back injury causes him to miss his Game 3 start, the Yankees would leave him off the roster and add either Jeff Karstens, Darrell Rasner or Sean Henn.
The decision to take Phillips as the backup first baseman over Craig Wilson or Aaron Guiel had as much to do with Phillips’ ability to play second and third base as his defense at first.
“We felt Phillips gave us the defense at first base,” Torre said. “Plus, in the event we want to use Cairo as a pinch-runner, we have a backup infielder who can play third, second or first.”
I can’t say have much issue with any of the choices. While I’d rather see them take 10 pitchers and add Aaron Guiel or Craig Wilson, given Johnson’s uncertain status taking 11 pitchers is the safer move.
Update: I saw this posted on Baseball Think Factory and thought it was interesting.
Another update: Since the batting race is the hot topic of the day, I’ll keep the table below updated in real-time.
| Player | Today | AVG |
|---|---|---|
![]() | 2-4 | .347 |
![]() | 1-5 | .343 |
![]() | 2-4 | .342 |
Monday, September 18, 2006
Good thing this weekend’s four game series with Boston was meaningless
It’s a good thing this weekend’s four game series with Boston was meaningless, because the Yankees played like garbage.
Game 1: Boston 5, Yankees 2
Game 2: Yankees 7, Boston 5
Game 3: Boston 6, Yankees 3
Game 4: Boston 5, Yankees 4
The game that really irritated me was the last one. Mike Myers is a lefty specialist. His job is to get lefties out. He’s actually had better success against righties this year (200/.321/.267 vs. .250/.292/.412 against lefties), but that’s over 28.2 innings. From 2003-2005, he held lefies to a line of .208/.278/.318 compared to .331/.450/.509. Joe Torre had Myers face five straight right-handed hitters, in the process turning a 4-2 lead into a 4-4 tie.
My thought is that Torre was trying to see if he can get away with not carrying Ron Villone on the postseason roster. If Myers can get an occasional righty out, they may not need Villone, whose effectiveness has decreased sharply whether due to regression towards his true talent level or overwork in the month of August or some combination of the two. Unfortunately, it cost the Yankees the game in the process.
The Yankees only have to win four of their 13 remaining games to clinch the division, so they’re not really in trouble, but it was annoying that they wasted the opportunity to bury Boston when they threw their three best starters against a Boston team that didn’t have Manny Ramirez and had to start the likes of Kevin Jarvis, Kyle Snyder, and Julian Tavarez.
For all the talk about the Yankees not needing Gary Sheffield, the lack of offense over the weekend seems to indicate that they might. Sheffield’s supposed to play in a simulated game tomorrow, so he may be ready to see game action by the end of the week.
The Yanks take on Toronto now, who have an elimination number of three, so if they can take two of three they’ll eliminate the Jays. Darrell Rasner takes on AJ Burnett. Another solid start by Rasner could get him into the postseason mix as a long reliever.
Thursday, September 7, 2006
Matsui, Thunder take opener
This Matsui kid looks like a keeper. More impressive than Hideki’s first game action back, check out Phil Hughes’s line for those who haven’t yet seen it.
6 IP, 5 H, 1 R, 1 BB, 13 K.
The big club whipped up on the Royals 8-3 last night. Randy Johnson was great, almost Anibal Sanchez-like, taking a no-hitter into the seventh before allowing a double. Johnson was pulled after seven innings and 81 pitches, and I was fine with this. The Yankees were winning 8-0 when he would have started the eighth, and with the game well in hand, many of the regulars in the lineup had been pulled. Gone were Johnny Damon, Derek Jeter, Jason Giambi, Bobby Abreu, Alex Rodriguez, and Jorge Posada.
If the game was so obviously over, why was Scott Proctor brought in? The Yankees currently have the following bullpen:
T.J. Beam
Brian Bruney
Octavio Dotel
Kyle Farnsworth
Sean Henn
Jeff Karstens
Mike Myers
Scott Proctor
Darrell Rasner
Mariano Rivera
Jose Veras
Ron Villone
Jaret Wright
Scratch Mo, who’s working his way back from a muscle strain. Scratch Villlone too, who has been acknowledged as perhaps slightly fatigued. Hell, scratch Bruney, Henn, and Dotel since they had pitched Tuesday night. You still had SEVEN other options with an 8-0 lead to get 6 outs before allowing eight runs. Instead, Torre went to Proctor, who leads all of baseball in appearances and innings and pitches by a reliever, in a low leverage situation. The same Scott Proctor who had pitched in two of the previous three games, once with a six run lead. With Mo ailing and Kyle Farnsworth being Kyle Farnsworth, there’s a chance that Proctor may be the Yankees’ most useful reliever if they get to the postseason. Why Joe? Why?
Eh, enough whining. It was a nice win to take the series against a Kansas City team that’s been playing pretty well since the All Star Break. Yanks have a day off today, then open up a 3 game series in Baltimore.
Page 1 of 1 pages:











































