The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Re-assessing the 2010 Yankees as of December 23, 2009

Since I last assessed the Yankees for 2010, they’ve added Nick Johnson to DH and Javier Vazquez to slot into the rotation, so it’s probably a good time to use my CAIRO projections and re-assess them.

Here's how the lineup and bench looks now.

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Derek Jeter SS 625 .307/.371/.425 84 393 29 -4 2.5
Nick Johnson DH 450 .271/.412/.418 65 265 10 0 1.0
Mark Teixeira 1b 670 .280/.379/.529 111 416 34 3 3.8
Alex Rodriguez 3b 605 .282/.389/.546 105 370 44 -4 4.0
Curtis Granderson CF 625 .257/.338/.462 87 414 26 5 3.1
Jorge Posada C 425 .266/.352/.455 58 276 21 -5 1.6
Robinson Cano 2b 625 .311/.348/.494 90 407 30 -1 3.0
Nick Swisher RF 550 .235/.355/.444 74 355 16 0 1.6
Brett Gardner LF 500 .262/.348/.351 59 326 7 2 0.9
Starters Total 5075 .277/.365/.463 733 3221 217 -2 21.5
Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jamie Hoffmann RF 350 .242/.317/.359 35 239 -2 2 0.0
Juan Miranda 1b 300 .247/.331/.427 37 201 3 0 0.3
Francisco Cervelli C 250 .251/.322/.357 24 170 2 0 0.2
Ramiro Pena SS 225 .240/.301/.316 19 157 -1 0 -0.1
Reegie Corona 2b 167 .246/.325/.335 17 113 1 0 0.1
Bench Total 1292 .245/.319/.363 131 879 2 2 0.4
Player PA BR AVG/OBP/SLG Outs BRAR RS WAR
Team Total 6367 864 .270/.356/.442 4100 219 -1 21.9


BR: Absolute linear weights batting runs based on estimated playing time, not adjusted for position.
Outs: Outs made while batting. Team outs should add up to around 4100 over a full season.
BRAR: Batting runs above replacement level at position.
RS: Runs saved compared to average, using an average of zone rating and UZR pro-rated to projected playing time.
WAR: Wins above replacement (BRAR + RS).

I've held the playing time for the holdover starters constant to my last post, but the addition of Johnson and the subsequent increased PAs for the entire team, as well as more playing time for TSBG over Melky leads to the Yankee position players projecting to score about 21 more runs (from 843 to 864) than the team as of December 16 without Johnson. The defense is essentially unchanged, going from -2 to -1.

On the pitching side, there are two scenarios right now. One has Joba Chamberlain as the fifth starter and Phil Hughes in the pen, and the other has the converse. For now I'll assume that whomever loses the rotation spot battle isn't going to get any starts, so extra starts will go to the 6-8 pitchers.

With Joba in the rotation, the pitching staff looks like this:

Pitching Role IP H R ER HR BB HBP K RA ERA FIP RSAR WAR
CC Sabathia SP1 200 179 77 72 15 49 7 176 3.48 3.24 3.26 55 5.5
Javier Vazquez SP2 200 183 84 78 21 46 5 194 3.76 3.52 3.37 49 4.9
A.J. Burnett SP3 175 161 84 78 18 72 8 169 4.30 4.02 3.95 33 3.3
Andy Pettitte SP4 175 184 89 80 16 59 4 131 4.59 4.12 3.94 27 2.7
Joba Chamberlain SP5 151 151 79 70 15 66 8 140 4.71 4.19 4.11 21 2.1
Chad Gaudin SP6 50 48 28 26 5 22 2 41 5.04 4.64 4.30 5 0.5
Sergio Mitre SP7 40 50 25 22 5 10 2 24 5.70 4.87 4.37 1 0.1
Zachary McAllister SP8 40 48 26 23 5 15 0 21 5.87 5.12 4.73 0 0.0
Starter Total 1031 1004 492 449 98 338 0 897 4.30 3.92 3.68 192 19.2
Mariano Rivera CL 69 51 20 18 5 11 2 71 2.55 2.36 2.70 21 2.1
Phil Hughes SU 70 62 30 29 6 24 3 69 3.92 3.67 3.54 10 1.0
Damaso Marte SU 50 48 25 21 5 18 2 49 4.54 3.81 3.76 4 0.4
David Robertson MR 65 57 30 26 4 35 1 76 4.14 3.60 3.25 8 0.8
Alfredo Aceves MR 65 66 35 33 9 16 2 45 4.87 4.60 4.42 3 0.3
Mark Melancon MR 50 53 29 26 5 18 2 35 5.27 4.72 4.42 0 0.0
Edwar Ramirez LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Ivan Nova LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Reliever Total 369 337 170 153 34 123 12 345 4.14 3.74 3.64 46 4.6
Pitching Total 1400 1340 662 602 132 461 12 1242 4.25 3.87 3.67 238 23.8


RA: Runs allowed per nine innings
ERA: Earned runs allowed per nine innings
FIP: Fielding independent pitching
RSAR: Runs saved above replacement level
WAR: Wins above replacement level (RSAR divided by 10)

Flipping Hughes and Chamberlain looks like this:

Pitching Role IP H R ER HR BB HBP K RA ERA FIP RSAR WAR
CC Sabathia SP1 200 179 77 72 15 49 7 176 3.48 3.24 3.26 55 5.5
Javier Vazquez SP2 200 183 84 78 21 46 5 194 3.76 3.52 3.37 49 4.9
A.J. Burnett SP3 175 161 84 78 18 72 8 169 4.30 4.02 3.95 33 3.3
Andy Pettitte SP4 175 184 89 80 16 59 4 131 4.59 4.12 3.94 27 2.7
Phil Hughes SP5 151 147 82 77 14 58 7 126 4.89 4.59 4.06 22 2.2
Chad Gaudin SP6 50 48 28 26 5 22 2 41 5.04 4.64 4.30 5 0.5
Sergio Mitre SP7 40 50 25 22 5 10 2 24 5.70 4.87 4.37 1 0.1
Zachary McAllister SP8 40 48 26 23 5 15 0 21 5.87 5.12 4.73 0 0.0
Starter Total 1031 1001 495 456 97 330 0 883 4.32 3.98 3.68 193 19.3
Mariano Rivera CL 69 51 20 18 5 11 2 71 2.55 2.36 2.70 21 2.1
Joba Chamberlain SU 70 63 29 26 6 27 4 77 3.77 3.35 3.51 10 1.0
Damaso Marte SU 50 48 25 21 5 18 2 49 4.54 3.81 3.76 4 0.4
David Robertson MR 65 57 30 26 4 35 1 76 4.14 3.60 3.25 8 0.8
Alfredo Aceves MR 65 66 35 33 9 16 2 45 4.87 4.60 4.42 3 0.3
Mark Melancon MR 50 53 29 26 5 18 2 35 5.27 4.72 4.42 0 0.0
Edwar Ramirez LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Ivan Nova LR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.0
Reliever Total 369 338 168 151 35 126 12 353 4.11 3.68 3.63 45 4.5
Pitching Total 1400 1339 664 606 132 456 12 1236 4.27 3.90 3.66 239 23.9


Although Joba will be without innings limits this year, I restricted him to 151 to allow for a direct comparison with Hughes, who I believe will have an innings limit, although I'm guessing at the 151.

There is one key point about the pitching projections. Projection systems don't understand that player skill/talent is static and never changes. They incorrectly assume that a weighted average of the most recent seasons adjusted for context such as league, park and defense combined with regression towards the mean and adjusting for aging tells us more about a player than what that player may have done five or six years ago for a team. So even though Javier Vazquez projects to put up a nice 3.52 ERA, we know for a fact that he is going to have a 4.91 ERA in 2010 because that's what he did in 2004 for the same exact Yankee team in the same exact stadium against the same exact opposition he faced back then with the same exact pitching coach and the same exact defense behind him.

Anyway, I went a little conservative on the IP by the starters to account for the fact that expecting your entire rotation to stay healthy all season is not particularly realistic. In the Hughes rotation/Joba bullpen scenario, the Yankees' team would project to do this:
Component R WAR
Offense 864 21.9
Defense -1 -0.1
Starting Pitchers 495 19.3
Relief Pitchers 168 4.5
RS/RA 864-663 45.8
Pythagenpat wpct .623
W-L 101-61


And in the converse scenario, they'd project to do this:
Component R WAR
Offense 864 21.9
Defense -1 -0.1
Starting Pitchers 492 19.2
Relief Pitchers 170 4.6
RS/RA 864-661 45.7
Pythagenpat wpct .625
W-L 101-61


Last year's team projected to be about a 95 win team heading into the season, and although they won 103 games their Pythagenpat record was around 95-96 wins. So even though the Yankees have had a terrible offseason, they look like they're six wins better while costing no more than last year's team did. If they can find a league average LF they would pick up maybe one more win.

I'll sign up for terrible offseasons like this every year.

Update: Here's a more optimistic version of the position player depth chart:

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Derek Jeter SS 670 .307/.371/.425 90 421 31 -4 2.7
Nick Johnson DH 560 .271/.412/.418 81 329 13 0 1.3
Mark Teixeira 1b 670 .280/.379/.529 111 416 34 3 3.8
Alex Rodriguez 3b 605 .282/.389/.546 105 370 44 -4 4.0
Curtis Granderson CF 670 .257/.338/.462 93 444 28 6 3.4
Jorge Posada C 475 .266/.352/.455 65 308 23 -5 1.8
Robinson Cano 2b 650 .311/.348/.494 93 424 31 -1 3.1
Nick Swisher RF 620 .235/.355/.444 84 400 18 0 1.9
Brett Gardner LF 525 .262/.348/.351 62 342 7 3 1.0
Starters Total 5445 .276/.366/.461 784 3454 230 -2 22.8
Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Jamie Hoffmann RF 300 .242/.317/.359 30 205 -2 2 0.0
Juan Miranda 1b 200 .247/.331/.427 25 134 2 0 0.2
Francisco Cervelli C 250 .251/.322/.357 24 170 2 0 0.2
Ramiro Pena SS 100 .240/.301/.316 8 70 -1 0 -0.1
Reegie Corona 2b 100 .246/.325/.335 10 67 0 0 0.0
Bench Total 950 .245/.320/.365 97 646 2 2 0.3
Player PA BR AVG/OBP/SLG Outs BRAR RS WAR
Team Total 6395 881 .271/.359/.446 4100 232 -1 23.1


--Posted at 10:29 am by SG / 137 Comments | - (235)




Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Assessing the 2010 Yankees as of December 16, 2009

I figured it’s time to take a look at how the Yankees’ roster for 2010 looks right now so we can see where the big holes are and speculate on how they should be resolved, so here’s how they look using CAIRO.

First, here’s my stab at the projected lineup and playing time.

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Derek Jeter SS 625 .307/.374/.425 84 391 29 -4 2.5
Curtis Granderson CF 625 .257/.339/.462 87 413 26 5 3.1
Mark Teixeira 1B 670 .280/.380/.529 111 416 34 3 3.8
Alex Rodriguez 3b 605 .282/.389/.546 105 370 44 -4 4.0
Robinson Cano 2B 625 .311/.348/.494 90 407 30 -1 3.0
Jorge Posada C 425 .266/.352/.455 58 276 21 -5 1.6
Nick Swisher RF 550 .235/.356/.444 74 354 16 0 1.6
Melky Cabrera LF 500 .263/.328/.390 56 336 4 -2 0.2
Juan Miranda DH 463 .247/.331/.427 57 310 1 0 0.1
Starters Total 5088 722 3272 205 -7 19.8


BR: Absolute linear weights batting runs based on estimated playing time, not adjusted for position.
Outs: Outs made while batting. Team outs should add up to around 4100 over a full season.
BRAR: Batting runs above replacement level at position.
RS: Runs saved compared to average, using an average of zone rating and UZR pro-rated to projected playing time.
WAR: Wins above replacement (BRAR + RS)

Playing time is a bit optimistic here right now for most of the starters, but I did that intentionally so we can see exactly which positions profile as the weakest over a full season. Shocking no one, it’s LF and DH, although I should note that Melky’s defensive projection in LF does not factor in his CF numbers and is based on a very small sample. Since he projects a hair above average in CF(+2), it’s more likely than not that he’d be a plus defender in LF. Maybe a +7 or so.

The bench looks like this.

Player Pos PA AVG/OBP/SLG BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Francisco Cervelli C 235 .251/.326/.357 23 158 2 0 0.2
Brett Gardner CF 275 .262/.353/.351 32 178 6 5 1.1
Ramiro Pena SS 240 .240/.306/.316 20 166 -2 0 -0.2
Kevin Russo 2B 175 .249/.313/.338 16 120 -1 0 -0.1
Jamie Hoffmann CF 300 .242/.319/.359 30 204 1 0 0.1
Bench Total 1225 121 827 7 5 1.1


Adding that up gets us this.

Player PA BR Outs BRAR RS WAR
Team Total 6313 843 4100 212 -2 21.0


We can probably add about a win to that if we assume Melky’s a +7 defender in LF instead of a -2. My version of WAR sets replacement level a touch higher than most (around a 52 win team) so this means the Yankee position players would push the Yankees to around 73 wins. For every WAR they can add at DH or LF, add another win to that.

As far as what they should do, I’ll say this:
1) I hate the concept of a rotating DH. It makes the assumption that the Yankees will be healthy all year. As soon as you lose one of your starters, you are now facing a situation where you’ll have a replacement level hitter at a position that can only provide value on offense.
2) I’m starting to cool on the idea of bringing back Johnny Damon at almost any cost. His projection scares me (.264/.345/.427) even though I know projections are limited. His defense scares me, even though last year wasn’t bad enough to drag down his defensive projection far below average. While Damon has every right to ask for whatever he wants in his next contract, I have every right to be annoyed about him doing it and I think I am now.

The Yankees probably need at least one bat, and preferrably two. One to put at DH, and one to put in LF. Their current payroll commitment for 2010 is around $188M according to Cot’s. That seems reasonably close to their rumored budget in 2010, so I don’t know what they can do.

Here’s how the pitching staff looks.

Pitching Role IP R WAR
CC Sabathia SP1 200 76 6.0
A.J. Burnett SP2 180 84 3.8
Andy Pettitte SP3 180 90 3.2
Joba Chamberlain SP4 170 87 2.8
Phil Hughes SP5 150 64 2.0
Chad Gaudin SP6 60 33 0.8
Sergio Mitre SP7 50 31 0.3
Zachary McAllister SP8 25 16 0.1
Starter Total 1015 480 19.0
Mariano Rivera CL 70 19 2.2
Damaso Marte SU 50 25 0.5
David Robertson SU 60 27 0.9
Alfredo Aceves MR 70 37 0.5
Mark Melancon MR 50 29 0.1
Romulo Sanchez MR 50 33 -0.4
Edwar Ramirez LR 25 13 0.2
Kei Igawa LR 25 20 -0.5
Ivan Nova LR 25 19 -0.4
Reliever Total 425 222 3.1
Pitching Total 1440 702 22.0



I’m just showing an estimated innings pitched and then the runs allowed over those innings for everyone, and how it translates to WAR. I use RA to calculate WAR, so it’s simply the difference in runs allowed over the projected innings compared to a replacement level pitcher.

I went a little more conservative here with the innings. CC’s projected to throw 230 but I knocked him down to 200. Burnett’s projected to throw 187, I knocked him down by a game, and also knocked Pettitte down by about 20 IP. I’m assuming Joba can throw 15 more innings than last year, and I’m also assuming Hughes’s prior time as a starter means he can get to 150 IP in 2010. Then I threw in some innings for Chad Gaudin, Sergio Mitre and Zach McAllister.

Using these estimated innings, the starters would project to be somewhere around 19.0 WAR, which is pretty good.

The bullpen ended up looking worse than I’d have expected. The top four are fine, but after that they’re essentially replacement level. Obviously we know that Mark Melancon is talented, but we also don’t know how good he’ll be in 2010. Romulo Sanchez has good stuff, but he’s never really done much with it, in either the majors or the minors. While I still think Edwar Ramirez can pitch at the major league level, the numbers right now aren’t too supportive. And even if Kei Igawa himself doesn’t actually pitch for the Yanks in 2010, someone who’ll give a similar performance very likely will which is why I have him in here.

Overall though, the pitching staff looks every bit as valuable as the position players, so this version of the Yankees on paper would look to be about 43.0 WAR in total. Add that to 52 and you get about a 95 win team. Looking at the runs scored (BR) and runs allowed (pitching and defense) and plugging it into Pythagenpat gives us a 94.8 - 67.2 record. In both cases we should subtract 2-3 wins from that to account for the AL East.

While this is encouraging, it makes a few big assumptions.
- Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes will be healthy and effective in the rotation all year
- No disastrous injuries in the rest of the pitching staff
- Good health from all the starting position players
- At least replacement level play by the bench

So now the question becomes, what bat(s) should they add?

--Posted at 10:29 am by SG / 199 Comments | - (240)




Monday, April 6, 2009

Looking Ahead to 2009: Pitching Staff Wrapup

The Yankees re-made their starting rotation by bringing in C.C. Sabathia and A.J. Burnett. With Chien-Ming Wang back from his injury, Andy Pettitte back as the #4 starter instead of the #2 starter and Joba Chamberlain hopefully spending a full season in the rotation and giving them 30-40 more innings, they should be pretty clearly improved over last year, but let's look at what the projections think. Defense is already incorporated in these projections so I will not double-count it by adding it in again.

Scenario 1: Optimistic
Because of the volatility of projecting pitchers in both health and effectiveness, I don't like doing just one projection for the pitching staff. So I'm going to present three different scenarios. First scenario will be what happens if everything goes to plan.
Pitcher Role IP cairo chone hbt marcel
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 220 95 3.48 3.44 91 3.41 3.33 86 3.25 3.28 84 3.07 3.13
A.J. Burnett SP2 200 100 4.07 3.58 93 3.88 3.76 92 3.85 3.76 97 3.99 3.72
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 200 97 4.16 4.04 107 4.47 3.97 93 3.88 4.07 90 3.83 3.89
Andy Pettitte SP4 200 109 4.45 3.98 104 4.31 3.93 102 4.27 4.04 106 4.38 3.99
Joba Chamberlain SP5 150 62 3.45 3.36 61 3.39 3.39 58 3.20 3.19 56 3.07 3.14
Phil Hughes SP6 70 37 4.53 3.94 36 4.28 4.21 36 4.28 4.27 38 4.61 4.19
Ian Kennedy SP7 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Alfredo Aceves SP8 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 20 2.38 2.61 24 2.86 2.79 21 2.52 2.57 25 3.09 3.08
Damaso Marte SU 60 30 4.09 3.77 28 3.78 3.76 27 3.73 3.72 28 3.92 3.62
Brian Bruney SU 50 29 4.95 4.84 25 4.11 4.29 23 3.80 4.22 22 3.56 4.10
Jose Veras MR 50 26 4.53 4.34 24 4.05 3.95 23 3.85 3.70 24 4.09 4.22
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 22 3.72 3.77 20 3.38 3.43 24 3.92 3.69 26 4.42 4.22
Phil Coke MR 40 22 4.62 4.10 16 3.38 3.73 21 4.32 5.33 15 3.13 3.64
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 25 5.29 4.67 23 4.75 4.76 19 4.03 4.44 19 4.09 3.90
David Robertson MR 20 8 3.47 3.04 10 4.08 4.11 10 4.08 3.99 11 4.50 3.95
Mark Melancon LR 20 12 4.79 3.96 12 4.73 4.85 10 4.19 4.39 10 4.32 4.32
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 692 4.01 3.75 674 3.89 3.63 645 3.73 3.76 653 3.76 3.68


Pitcher Role IP pecota zips Average
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 220 92 3.43 3.38 81 3.07 3.23 88 3.29 3.28
A.J. Burnett SP2 200 93 3.82 3.73 95 3.97 3.86 95 3.93 3.71
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 200 109 4.39 4.19 94 3.92 3.80 98 4.11 3.98
Andy Pettitte SP4 200 107 4.41 4.02 106 4.43 3.99 106 4.37 3.98
Joba Chamberlain SP5 150 57 3.09 3.05 68 3.77 3.61 60 3.33 3.27
Phil Hughes SP6 70 40 4.74 4.27 36 4.27 3.83 37 4.45 4.10
Ian Kennedy SP7 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Alfredo Aceves SP8 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 21 2.42 2.54 19 2.28 2.24 22 2.59 2.61
Damaso Marte SU 60 27 3.76 3.84 26 3.58 3.60 28 3.81 3.70
Brian Bruney SU 50 27 4.47 4.69 28 4.63 4.90 26 4.25 4.48
Jose Veras MR 50 22 3.70 3.75 26 4.31 4.36 24 4.09 4.03
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 21 3.51 3.69 23 3.86 3.58 23 3.80 3.71
Phil Coke MR 40 19 3.97 4.21 19 3.90 4.53 19 3.88 4.25
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 22 4.58 4.49 23 4.87 4.87 22 4.60 4.51
David Robertson MR 20 9 3.62 3.40 10 4.13 3.78 10 3.98 3.69
Mark Melancon LR 20 11 4.34 4.09 12 5.02 4.82 11 4.56 4.39
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 678 3.86 3.75 666 3.86 3.76 668 3.85 3.72


With this pitching staff, the Yankees would project to win 99 games on paper, although we have to adjust that downward for strength of AL East, so figure around 97.

Scenario 2: More Realistic
Pitcher Role IP cairo chone hbt marcel
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 200 86 3.48 3.44 82 3.41 3.33 78 3.25 3.28 77 3.07 3.13
A.J. Burnett SP2 180 90 4.07 3.58 84 3.88 3.76 83 3.85 3.76 88 3.99 3.72
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 175 85 4.16 4.04 93 4.47 3.97 81 3.88 4.07 79 3.83 3.89
Andy Pettitte SP4 175 95 4.45 3.98 91 4.31 3.93 90 4.27 4.04 93 4.38 3.99
Joba Chamberlain SP5 125 52 3.45 3.36 51 3.39 3.39 48 3.20 3.19 47 3.07 3.14
Phil Hughes SP6 100 54 4.53 3.94 51 4.28 4.21 51 4.28 4.27 55 4.61 4.19
Ian Kennedy SP7 50 30 4.84 4.48 27 4.41 4.51 28 4.63 4.68 30 5.01 4.35
Alfredo Aceves SP8 35 20 4.83 4.37 21 4.95 4.96 21 4.95 4.87 16 3.86 4.34
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 20 2.38 2.61 24 2.86 2.79 21 2.52 2.57 25 3.09 3.08
Damaso Marte SU 60 30 4.09 3.77 28 3.78 3.76 27 3.73 3.72 28 3.92 3.62
Brian Bruney SU 50 29 4.95 4.84 25 4.11 4.29 23 3.80 4.22 22 3.56 4.10
Jose Veras MR 50 26 4.53 4.34 24 4.05 3.95 23 3.85 3.70 24 4.09 4.22
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 22 3.72 3.77 20 3.38 3.43 24 3.92 3.69 26 4.42 4.22
Phil Coke MR 40 22 4.62 4.10 16 3.38 3.73 21 4.32 5.33 15 3.13 3.64
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 25 5.29 4.67 23 4.75 4.76 19 4.03 4.44 19 4.09 3.90
David Robertson MR 20 8 3.47 3.04 10 4.08 4.11 10 4.08 3.99 11 4.50 3.95
Mark Melancon LR 20 12 4.79 3.96 12 4.73 4.85 10 4.19 4.39 10 4.32 4.32
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 703 4.07 3.80 683 3.94 3.70 658 3.81 3.84 664 3.83 3.74


Pitcher Role IP pecota zips Average
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 200 83 3.43 3.38 74 3.07 3.23 80 3.29 3.28
A.J. Burnett SP2 180 84 3.82 3.73 86 3.97 3.86 86 3.93 3.71
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 175 95 4.39 4.19 82 3.92 3.80 86 4.11 3.98
Andy Pettitte SP4 175 94 4.41 4.02 93 4.43 3.99 93 4.37 3.98
Joba Chamberlain SP5 125 47 3.09 3.05 57 3.77 3.61 50 3.33 3.27
Phil Hughes SP6 100 58 4.74 4.27 51 4.27 3.83 53 4.45 4.10
Ian Kennedy SP7 50 28 4.71 4.52 27 4.57 4.39 28 4.70 4.47
Alfredo Aceves SP8 35 21 5.03 4.84 22 5.19 5.18 20 4.80 4.75
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 21 2.42 2.54 19 2.28 2.24 22 2.59 2.61
Damaso Marte SU 60 27 3.76 3.84 26 3.58 3.60 28 3.81 3.70
Brian Bruney SU 50 27 4.47 4.69 28 4.63 4.90 26 4.25 4.48
Jose Veras MR 50 22 3.70 3.75 26 4.31 4.36 24 4.09 4.03
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 21 3.51 3.69 23 3.86 3.58 23 3.80 3.71
Phil Coke MR 40 19 3.97 4.21 19 3.90 4.53 19 3.88 4.25
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 22 4.58 4.49 23 4.87 4.87 22 4.60 4.51
David Robertson MR 20 9 3.62 3.40 10 4.13 3.78 10 3.98 3.69
Mark Melancon LR 20 11 4.34 4.09 12 5.02 4.82 11 4.56 4.39
Kei Igawa LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 690 3.93 3.82 678 3.92 3.82 679 3.92 3.79


In this scenario, I removed innings from the starting five, but kept the bullpen the same. Removing those innings cost the Yankees a win, thanks to reasonably good projections for Hughes/Kennedy/Aceves. That may or may not be a faulty assumption

Scenario 3: Disaster (or when Kei Igawa strikes)
Let's say Sabathia's workload catches up to him and he misses some time. Let's also say A.J. Burnett misses a chunk of the season too, and let's under-estimate the Wang/Pettitte/Chamberlain innings>

Pitcher Role IP cairo chone hbt marcel
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 175 75 3.48 3.44 72 3.41 3.33 68 3.25 3.28 67 3.07 3.13
A.J. Burnett SP2 150 75 4.07 3.58 70 3.88 3.76 69 3.85 3.76 73 3.99 3.72
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 150 73 4.16 4.04 80 4.47 3.97 70 3.88 4.07 67 3.83 3.89
Andy Pettitte SP4 150 82 4.45 3.98 78 4.31 3.93 77 4.27 4.04 80 4.38 3.99
Joba Chamberlain SP5 100 41 3.45 3.36 41 3.39 3.39 38 3.20 3.19 38 3.07 3.14
Phil Hughes SP6 50 27 4.53 3.94 26 4.28 4.21 26 4.28 4.27 27 4.61 4.19
Ian Kennedy SP7 50 30 4.84 4.48 27 4.41 4.51 28 4.63 4.68 30 5.01 4.35
Alfredo Aceves SP8 50 29 4.83 4.37 30 4.95 4.96 30 4.95 4.87 23 3.86 4.34
Kei Igawa SP9 165 116 5.95 5.01 94 4.77 4.82 111 5.59 5.61 98 5.08 4.89
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 20 2.38 2.61 24 2.86 2.79 21 2.52 2.57 25 3.09 3.08
Damaso Marte SU 60 30 4.09 3.77 28 3.78 3.76 27 3.73 3.72 28 3.92 3.62
Brian Bruney SU 50 29 4.95 4.84 25 4.11 4.29 23 3.80 4.22 22 3.56 4.10
Jose Veras MR 50 26 4.53 4.34 24 4.05 3.95 23 3.85 3.70 24 4.09 4.22
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 17 2.95 3.44 16 2.68 3.08 19 3.11 3.70 21 3.51 3.92
Phil Coke MR 40 27 5.82 4.33 20 4.25 4.02 26 5.44 5.33 19 3.94 3.89
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 25 5.29 4.67 23 4.75 4.76 19 4.03 4.44 19 4.09 3.90
David Robertson MR 20 8 3.47 3.04 10 4.08 4.11 10 4.08 3.99 11 4.50 3.95
Mark Melancon LR 20 12 4.79 3.96 12 4.73 4.85 10 4.19 4.39 10 4.32 4.32
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 740 4.30 3.95 699 4.03 3.82 694 4.02 4.05 682 3.95 3.87

Pitcher Role IP pecota zips Average
R ERA FIP R ERA FIP R ERA FIP
C.C. Sabathia SP1 175 73 3.43 3.38 64 3.07 3.23 70 3.29 3.28
A.J. Burnett SP2 150 70 3.82 3.73 71 3.97 3.86 71 3.93 3.71
Chien-Ming Wang SP3 150 81 4.39 4.19 71 3.92 3.80 74 4.11 3.98
Andy Pettitte SP4 150 80 4.41 4.02 80 4.43 3.99 79 4.37 3.98
Joba Chamberlain SP5 100 38 3.09 3.05 45 3.77 3.61 40 3.33 3.27
Phil Hughes SP6 50 29 4.74 4.27 26 4.27 3.83 27 4.45 4.10
Ian Kennedy SP7 50 28 4.71 4.52 27 4.57 4.39 28 4.70 4.47
Alfredo Aceves SP8 50 30 5.03 4.84 31 5.19 5.18 29 4.80 4.75
Kei Igawa SP9 165 105 5.31 5.05 117 5.91 5.71 107 5.43 5.17
Mariano Rivera Cl 70 21 2.42 2.54 19 2.28 2.24 22 2.59 2.61
Damaso Marte SU 60 27 3.76 3.84 26 3.58 3.60 28 3.81 3.70
Brian Bruney SU 50 27 4.47 4.69 28 4.63 4.90 26 4.25 4.48
Jose Veras MR 50 22 3.70 3.75 26 4.31 4.36 24 4.09 4.03
Edwar Ramirez MR 50 17 2.79 3.38 18 3.06 3.22 18 3.02 3.43
Phil Coke MR 40 24 4.99 4.43 24 4.91 4.72 23 4.89 4.44
Jonathan Albaladejo MR 40 22 4.58 4.49 23 4.87 4.87 22 4.60 4.51
David Robertson MR 20 9 3.62 3.40 10 4.13 3.78 10 3.98 3.69
Mark Melancon LR 20 11 4.34 4.09 12 5.02 4.82 11 4.56 4.39
Dan Giese LR 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total 1440 715 4.09 3.96 718 4.16 4.05 708 4.09 3.95




That costs the Yankees about four wins.

Conclusion
So assuming the Yankees will score 851 runs, here's what we're looking at:
Scenario 1: 851 RS/666 RA, 99-63 Pythagenpat W-L, 97-65 AL East adjusted.
Scenario 2: 851 RS/678 RA, 98-64 Pythagenpat W-L, 96-66 AL East adjusted.
Scenario 3: 851 RS/708 RA, 95-67 Pythagenpat W-L, 93-69 AL East adjusted.

It's possible more could go wrong than that on both offense and defense, but it's Opening Day! Let's be a little optimistic.

Since the possiblities as far as playing time are basically limitless, I've uploaded my projection spreadsheet for anyone who wants to play around with different combinations. The only fields that you have to edit are highlighted in light green. You have to type in the player's name as First Name "space" Last Name, then fill in their plate appearances/innings and then the rest of the sheet should automatically populate. Team totals should add up to around 6500 PA on offense, 1440 innings for pitching.

How awesome is Opening Day?
--Posted at 10:59 am by SG / 34 Comments | - (210)




Thursday, January 15, 2009

MLB.com: Yanks extend Spring Training invites

With four weeks remaining before the official report date for Spring Training, the Yankees announced 20 non-roster invitations on Wednesday for Major League camp.

On New York’s list are four pitchers, five catchers, seven infielders and four outfielders, increasing the total number of players scheduled to report to 60.
...
Eleven of those invited had previously played in the Yankees’ organization. On that list are catcher Kyle Anson, outfielder Colin Curtis, left-hander Kei Igawa, outfielder Austin Jackson, right-hander Mark Melancon, catcher Jesus Montero, infielder Eduardo Nunez, infielder Ramiro Pena, catcher P.J. Pilittere, catcher Austin Romine and infielder Kevin Russo.

The Yankees announced that first baseman Shelley Duncan, who made the Yankees’ 25-man roster out of Spring Training last season, will attend this year as a non-roster player. He cleared waivers Wednesday and was outrighted to Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre.

Kei Igawa?  Really?

--Posted at 9:39 am by SG / 185 Comments | - (266)




Monday, December 15, 2008

NJ Star-Ledger: Deal for Cameron still possible for New York Yankees

While the Yankees’ trade talks with the Milwaukee Brewers appeared stalled Monday, there is good reason to believe the deal will eventually come to fruition.

New ace CC Sabathia, whose signing by the Yankees is expected to be made official this week, became close with center fielder Mike Cameron and infielder Bill Hall during his two-plus months with Milwaukee last season. The Yankees pulled out all the stops to convince Sabathia to sign with them, and there are indications they told Sabathia they would pursue his pals as well.

--Posted at 11:48 pm by Jonathan / 323 Comments | - (750)




Sunday, November 16, 2008

If the 2009 Season Started On November 16, 2008

It’d be pretty damn cold for baseball, but I thought it would be interesting to look at how the Yankees project right now, prior to any free agent signings.  So here are the CAIRO projections for the presumed starting nine and for the pitching staff.

BR: Raw batting runs using linear weights
BRAR: Position-adjusted batting runs above replacement
RS: Runs saved defensively at listed position
WAR: Wins above replacement level

For now the bench is set to replacement level, although that could change.  The playing time for the starting nine is probably a little optimistic, but the offseason is the time for optimism, right?

So as presently constituted, the Yankees look like a team that should score around 830 runs next season if they don’t add any more offense.  They also look to be about a win below average defensively, which is much better than last season.  Brett Gardner’s defensive projection is probably too generous, but that could be countered by Nick Swisher’s 1B defense if the scouting reports are more accurate than his zone rating.  Melky Cabrera and Gardner are basically projected to be worth the same in total, so swapping one with the other shouldn’t make a ton of difference on virtual paper.

The offense may very likely not change this offseason, but the pitching will very likely change quite a bit.

RSAR: Runs saved above replacement level pitcher
WAR: Wins above replacement level

I am trying to be pessimistic with the pitching staff on purpose, so I’m using the players’ projected innings rather than adjusting for 2009 expectations (ie, Joba pitching 117 innings instead of around 140).  As a squad, the Yankees look to allow around 760 runs with the pitching staff as currently constituted.  Obviously, more innings by Chamberlain, Wang and Hughes could fix that somewhat.  The releiver numbers aren’t adjusted for leverage, so that’s another area where they could see a little boost.  The current Yankee defense is already included in the pitcher projections, so we don’t need to add the below-average defense projection in.

A team that would score 828 runs and allow 761 would have a PythagenPat winning percentage of .540, which is equivalent to an 88 win team.  If you add C.C. Sabathia and his projected 229 innings to the mix, taking away Kei Igawa and reducing Aceves’s and Kennedy’s innings, this is how the staff would look.

With the same offense, that’s a 93 win PythagenPat team, although given the strength of the AL East, we would probably want to knock that down by a few wins. 

We can play the ‘what if they sign _____?’ game now, so if you’d like to get a feel for how much adding certain players would be worth, ask in the comments.

--Posted at 5:57 pm by SG / 111 Comments | - (396)




Thursday, October 2, 2008

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Relief Pitching Edition)

After looking at a bunch of underperformance, there was one bright spot in the 2008 Yankees’ season, the bullpen.  Like with the starters, I’m just going to look at the optimistic scenario from the pitching projection entry back in March.

Mariano F’ing Rivera

FR: FIP converted to runs allowed
FIP: Fielding independent-pitching
RSAR: Runs saved above a replacement level pitcher.

Mariano Rivera is awesome.  Mo rebounded from what looked like the start of his decline to put up what was arguably the best season of his career, at least on a rate basis.  How dominant was Rivera?

It was only the second season EVER where a pitcher pitched 60 or more innings and had a WHIP less than 0.675.

It was only the second season EVER where a pitcher pitched 60 or more innings and had a K/BB ratio greater than 12.

Opponents hit .165/.190/.233 against him.

It was the third lowest OPS+ ever allowed by a pitcher who pitched at least 60 innings.

Rivera passed 1000 innings pitched this year, putting him on the top of Baseball Reference’s ERA+ career leaderboard.  No pitcher has ever prevented runs relative to his era and ballpark better than Rivera has.

So yeah, Mo’s pretty good. And he did all this with bone spurs in his throwing shoulder.  We are fortunate to have watched him.

Rivera’s season was 14 runs better than projected.

Joba Chamberlain

Somewhere, Mike Francessa is sighing wistfully about Joba the reliever.  Joba did pretty well in the pen again in 2008, although he was more valuable as a starter.  I am hoping that Chamberlain will start 2009 in the rotation, even if it takes some juggling to keep his innings down, and early offseason talk is that Joba will start exclusively in 2009.

Chamberlain was about 4 runs better than projected to be in relief, partially because he pitched 5 more innings than expected out of the pen. 

The Farns

Raise your hand if you miss the Farns.  While his ERA was respectable during his 2008 Yankee stint, his HR rate led to a very frightening FIP.  Although the Ivan Rodriguez trade didn’t really work out, the Yankees sold Farns at the right time.  Still, he saved a couple of runs more than projected.  He’s a free agent this year, maybe the Yankees should re-sign him.  NOT!

The Hawk

So we were 3-3 with guys exceeding expectations, but LaTroy Hawkins breaks the string.  He seems like a good guy but his Yankee stint was disappointing.  He was 7 runs worse than expected before being traded to Houston, where he ripped up AAAA.

Chris Britton

Britton’s probably begging for a trade at this point.  He projected decently but didn’t get much work, and when he did he didn’t do much with it, ending the year at 4 runs worse than projected.  I’d be surprised to see him on the Yankees in 2009.

Brian Bruney

Bruney was very effective in 2008, although his peripherals indicate a fair bit of luck.  His walk rate is still pretty high, but his stuff is dominant.  He was throwing a 90 mph slider at the end of the year.  He missed a good chunk of the year with a foot injury, but was quite good on both sides of that.  He saved 10 runs more than expected.  I wouldn’t expect him to be quite this good next year, but I think his FIP is a reasonable expectation for what he may do, an ERA in the mid 3s.

Edwar Ramirez

Despite what some beat writers will tell you, Edwar Ramirez had a pretty good year.  Yeah, he’s HR prone, but that’s really his only major weakness, although I guess I’d like to see him walk fewer people too.  I wouldn’t necessarily trust him to be a setup man right now, but he was a good solid arm to have in the middle of the pen and should be next year as well.  Edwar pitched more than I expected him to and did pretty well, saving 4 runs above his projections.

Ross Ohlendorf

Gone and not really missed.  The Yankees have a bunch of guys who profile better on the way.  Ohlendorf has good stuff, but it didn’t translate to the field as he got hammered in the bigs, allowing 9 runs more than his relief projection.  He didn’t do much better in Pittsburgh, matching his 66 ERA+, although that came as a starter.

The Others

I didn’t include any of these guys in my original projections so they get lumped together here.  Jose Veras had a surprisingly good start to the season before faltering over the last month.

May 3 - Aug 24
IP: 46.7
H: 38
R: 14
ER: 14
HR: 6
BB: 17
K: 50
ERA: 2.70
FIP: 3.82
xFIP: 3.68
tRA: 4.45

His peripherals indicated that he was probably lucky to have an ERA of 2.70, and sure enough a correction came.

Aug 27 - Sep 28
IP: 11.3
H: 16
R: 9
ER: 9
HR: 1
BB: 12
K: 14
ERA: 7.15
FIP: 5.05
xFIP: 5.55
tRA: 5.51

I’m still skeptical about Veras because his command is still not very good.  I do think he can be a useful middle inning reliever, although I’d probably peg him as a true talent 4.50 ERA guy, not the 3.64 ERA guy he was this year.

Phil Coke is a bad-ass.  I wouldn’t read too much into the results of 14.7 innings, but he just looks like he’s got the goods to be a strong lefty reliever.  In his last outing of the year he was hitting 96 mph.  I’d still probably try him out as a starter first though, with the bullpen as a fall-back if that doesn’t work.

Dan Giese is probably a decent depth guy to have as a fifth starter or long reliever, and he had a pretty good season, although I don’t see the Yankees keeping a spot on the roster open for him to start 2009.

Alfredo Aceves impressed after his callup, although his FIP says we should expect him to not be quite so good. Still, I liked what I saw from him in his limited time and think he could be average or slightly below as a swingman.

Damaso Marte did not impress in 2008 as a Yankee, although his FIP is encouraging.  His option isn’t cheap, and he’s a type A free agent, so the Yankees may think long and hard about picking up his option.  If I had to guess, they will eventually do so.  He’ll still be a Type A free agent next season, and he buys the Yankees more time to sift through the kids.  He could also be traded mid-season for prospects like Jeff Karstens.

David Robertson’s ERA isn’t pretty, but really, he pitched pretty well in the majors for the most part.  A 3.60 FIP is very good for a young relief prospect, and 5 of the 18 runs he gave up came in one brutal outing.  Take that outing out of his line, and his ERA falls to 3.90.  And I know you can play that game with almost anyone, but it makes me feel better.

I won’t run through the rest, but overall, even the non-projected relievers pitched pretty well, putting up a 4.11 ERA and saving 17 runs above replacement.

Here’s what the final tally for the bullpen looks like.

If you wanted to draw one positive from this year’s Yankees, the emergence of the bullpen has to be it.  While the bulk of the credit for that has to go to the pitchers, Joe Girardi also deserves some credit.  For the most part he seemed to spread the work around (although I think Jose Veras may be Spanish for Scott Proctor), and the bulk of the pen was effective because of it.  They were collectively 64 runs better than replacement level, or 31 runs better than projected. Take away Hawkins, Ohlendorf and Traber since they’re no longer on the team and they would have saved 79 runs above replacement level.  While we have to rationally expect Mo to give back some of his 2008 value and Joba to not be in the pen (hopefully), there’s enough good depth here to make the bullpen a strength again in 2009.

The even better part is, there’s more potential help on the way in Jonathan Albaladejo, Humberto Sanchez, and Mark Melancon.

So we should change the title of this entry, because the relief pitching had nothing to do with the disappointment.  In fact, if you factor in leverage, they may have been the difference between this being an 81 win team or an 89 win team. 

Looking at the final numbers, we have an offense that underperformed by 141 runs, a defense that underperformed by 18 runs, a starting rotation that underperformed by 30 runs, and a bullpen that overperformed by 31 runs.  We probably shouldn’t separate out the defense from the pitching since that would double-count it, so we basically have a team that had a run differential 140 runs worse than expected.  Adding those 140 runs to the Yankees’ Pythagenpat wins (87) and re-calculating Pythagenpat would have made them a 100 win team.  Factor in their strength of schedule, and you end up right around the optimistic projection of 97 wins.

So as long as the Yankees fix the offense, defense and starting rotation for 2009, they should be fine.

--Posted at 6:47 am by SG / 128 Comments | - (277)




Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Starting Pitching Edition)

Although Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy disappointed this season, overall the pitching staff was not nearly the biggest problem on the team.  Projecting pitching kind of sucks, so when I wrote this entry back in March, I looked at two different scenarios.  Scenario 1 was more optimistic about pitcher health, Scenario 2 added in more missed time and more scrub time, although I had no idea that the Yanks would go back to Snacks at some point. 

For the player comparisons I’m going to use the optimistic scenarios, then at the end I’ll also look at the pessimistic one on a team-wide level.  I decided to break the pitching up by starters and relievers, so here’s the starting pitching part.

Scenario 1

FR: FIP converted to runs allowed
FIP: Fielding independent-pitching
RSAR: Runs saved above a replacement level pitcher.

I think a lot of us took Chien-Ming Wang for granted.  No, he’s not as good as C.C. Sabathia or Johan Santana.  News flash, hardly anyone is.  Is he an ace?  Well, he’s one of the top 30 starters in baseball.  Whether that makes him an ace or not is open to interpretation I suppose.

Wang pitched right around where he was projected to, rate-wise.  The problem is he got hurt and only pitched 95 innings, which cost the Yankees 13 runs.  Thankfully it’s not an arm injury and Wang should be back at full strength next year.  If you are wondering how the Yankees are going to move from 89 wins to 95 or so, here’s one of those missing wins(hopefully).

Thanks to a dreadful end to his season, it’s easy to forget that Pettite pitched well for a large part of 2008.  Through July 26 he had an ERA of 3.76.  It didn’t appear to be a fluke, as his FIP was 3.68 and his xFIP was 3.58 through that point.

Then, the wheels seemed to come off over his last 12 games, as Pettitte gave up 50 runs in 71 innings, an RA of 6.34.  Interestingly, his FIP was only 3.72 and his xFIP was only 4.03 over this stretch.  He just gave up a lot more hits on balls in play.  This period coincided with a reported sore shoulder, so it’s possible Pettitte still has something left in the tank.  I’m still not sure if I’d bring him back or not, although a lot of that depends on if Mike Mussina retires.  Anyhoo, Pettitte was about six runs worse than expected.

Phil Hughes’s 2008 probably could have gone a little better.  Instead of 160 good innings, the Yankees got 34 mostly awful ones.  Hughes suffered a rib injury early in the year that supposedly affected his mechanics.  When it got diagnosed it led to him being shelved for most of the year, although he ended the season on a positive note with eight innings of two run ball against Toronto in his last start of the year.  Hughes was a 25 run disappointment compared to his projection.

As disappointing as Hughes was, Ian Kennedy was worse.  Like Hughes, Kennedy failed to win a start.  Unlike Hughes, his peripherals don’t show much promise, and he never really had Hughes’s ceiling.  While his minor league track record is impressive, I have a feeling the Yankees have soured on Kennedy and there’s a very good chance that if he makes an impact in MLB it’ll be in another uniform.  Kennedy was 29 runs worse than expectations.

After a whole bunch of disappointments comes one of the two best stories of the Yankee season IMO.  Mike Mussina had a horrible 2007, putting up an ERA of 5.15 and for all intents and purposes he looked like he was cooked.  When he started the year 1-3 with a 5.75 ERA, it seemed like just a matter of time before he was going to be out of the rotation.  Some dolt even wrote a blog entry about it.

A funny thing happened though.  Moose won his next five starts, putting up an ERA of 2.76 and saving his spot in the rotation.  From there, he finished the year by going 14-6 with a 3.17 ERA, culminating in his 20th win of the season on the season’s final day.  Most of us know that win/loss records are not really a good indicator of a pitcher’s skill since it’s so heavily dependent on run support, but we do know that Moose was great.  Instead of being worth 10 runs above replacement, he was worth 40.

I don’t know if Moose is going to retire.  I’d love to have him back for another season, even though I’d expect him to decline a bit next year.

Unlike Hughes and Kennedy, Joba Chamberlain kicked ass as a starter.  Unfortunately, he came up with tendinitis in Texas and that cost him about a month.  When he came back he went back to the bullpen since the Yankees felt he wouldn’t be able to stretched back out into a starter in time.  This gave the ‘Joba should pitch teh eight’ clowns more ammunition for their silly battle, but the good news is that Joba wants to start, Joe Girardi wants him to start, and Brian Cashman wants him to start.  Anyone with a brain should understand that 200 innings of Joba as a starter is more valuable than 80 innings of Joba as a reliever, even if you factor in leverage.

Oops, I went off on a tangent.  Since we only had one season of data to project Joba in 2008, his projection was pretty conservative.  Despite pitching 35 fewer starter innings than expected, he was four runs better than projected.

Since we’re looking at the optimistic scenario, I don’t really have anything to compare every one else who started this year with, but here’s how they did collectively.

Update: Fixed the two charts below.

And here’s how it all looks in terms of RSAR (assuming replacement level for all non-projected pitchers)

So we have the starters collectively being worth 67 - 6 RSAR, a total of 61.  The optimistic projection had the Yankees’ starters giving up 498 runs, and the pessimistic had them giving up 518 runs.  Yankee starters actually gave up 528 runs.  So overall, the difference between the optimistic projection of the starting pitching and what actually happened is -30 runs, and between the pessimistic projection and what actually happened it’s -10 runs.  I guess I need to be more pessimistic next year. 

One last thing, if you look at the ERA compared to FIP for the Yankee starters, you’ll see a fairly significant difference, on the order of around 60 runs.  FIP regresses BABIP to average (aka, an average defense), so this ties into the -40 defense the Yankees played this year.  There’s still a 20 run difference, which is most likely an issue with hit location.  According to the team stats page at the Hardball Times, the Yankees didn’t give up a higher percentage of line drives than the average team.

So you can add starting pitching to the 2008 Yankees’ list of underperformances, although it’s not nearly as much to blame as the offense is.  That won’t stop some people from blaming Hughes/Kennedy and the non-Santana trade of course…

--Posted at 7:44 am by SG / 112 Comments | - (283)




Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Batting Runs Above Average Using Run Expectancy

My post about contextualizing linear weights got linked over at The Book Blog, which led to a new discovery for me.  Fangraphs, which is really a wonderful site for stat dorks, tracks a version of batting runs above average that is not context-neutral.  Instead, they use the difference in run expectancy before and after every plate appearance or batters faced.  The full glossary definition is here, but here’s the heart of it. 

BRAA (batting runs above average): BRAA is the difference in run expectancy (RE) between the start of the play and the end of the play. That difference is then credited/debited to the batter and the pitcher.

What I like about this is it adds the out state to the base states I was using, and it includes pitchers, and it doesn’t give different weights based on innings or scores.  Basically, you look at what an average player adds to his team on each specific play for each of the 24 base/out states, then you compare that to what each player actually does.

Since it includes pitchers we can do direct comparisons of everyone on the team and see how they’ve stacked up this year as well.

Here’s the offense.


Here are the starting pitchers.


Here are the relievers.


And here’s everyone.


These numbers are not position-adjusted, so you may want to account for that.  Here are my 2008 AL position adjustments based on 650 PAs.

C 10
1B -5
2B 0
3B 0
SS 12
LF -4
CF -3
RF -6
DH -6

So you’d subtract around 5 runs from Giambi’s value, you’d add around 12 to Jeter’s (pro-rated).  Here’s how the overall chart looks if we position-adjust for the offensive players.


These numbers are against average, not replacement level.  Also as a reminder, a measure like this is not necessarily supposed to be predictive, it’s retroactive.

This says that in total, the Yankees have been about four wins better than average including everything except baserunning and defense, although I think the bulk of defense is included in the pitchers’ BRAA.  An average team over 151 games would be 76-75 or so, and the Yankees are 80-71, or four games better than average.

Update(s):
As requested by DaPuj, I’ve added the context neutral batting runs above average for the position players to the overall Yankee chart.

And here’s the top 25 in the AL for contextualized, position adjusted BRAA for position players.

And the bottom 25.

Lastly, adding in pitchers here’s the top 50.

--Posted at 12:08 pm by SG / 23 Comments | - (375)




Wednesday, September 3, 2008

tRA and the 2008 Yankees

By way of Baseball Think Factory, I was introduced to a new stat called tRA.  What is tRA?  It’s a way to evaluate pitchers based on their peripheral stats and batted ball types allowed, developed by Graham MacAree who writes for Lookout Landing.  He also has a new site called StatCorner which looks like it’s going to be a cool site for more in-depth statistical analysis.

What tRA does is assign run values to each event a pitcher allows, but removing the defense.  It’s more in depth than FIP or DIPS which regress BABIP to league average, because it makes use of an important factor that FIP and DIPS ignore.  All batted ball types are NOT created equal.  A pitcher who allows more line drives should allow a higher BABIP, all other things being equal.  So ground balls, fly balls, and line drives are given average run values for those events.

tRA also assigns out values for each event that a pitcher allows.  The events are park-adjusted and out values are for what an average defense would do, so what tRA should give us is the net performance of a pitcher in a neutral park with an average defense behind him, but with more information than something like FIP, xFIP, or DIPS gives us.  If you want to read more about the actual run values and out values and park adjustments, it’s all discussed at this link.

Here’s what tRA says for the 2008 Yankees.

RV: Run value of all events.
OV: Out value of all events.
tRSAA: Runs saved above average using tRA
tRSAR: Runs saved above replacement using tRA
tWAR: Wins above replacement using tRA (tRSAR/10)

This doesn’t account for leverage, but Mo is still the best pitcher on the Yankees by this measure.  The Yankee pitching staff scores decently by this measure, but when you factor in a team defense that’s 48 runs below average overall by zone rating, you go from a run prevention unit that’s 15 wins better than replacement to one that’s 10 wins better.

And lastly, here’s how the AL teams stack up using this measure.

Seems about right.  The White Sox raw pitching stats may look middling, but when you factor in their ballpark they may be the best pitching staff in the league.  Toronto and Tampa have them beat in ERA+, but that’s most likely a function of defense (Toronto is +48!!! by zone rating as far as runs saved, and Tampa is +8, the White Sox are +3).

I think this a pretty cool way to look at pitching in more depth, but I’d be interested to see what everyone else thinks.  The methodology certainly seems sound to me.

--Posted at 12:19 am by SG / 83 Comments | - (362)




Friday, May 9, 2008

NY Post: WELLS WOULD LOVE YANKEE RETURN

May 9, 2008—For his 45th birthday in 11 days, David Wells wants something pinstriped.

The free-agent left-hander told The Post yesterday he has been working out near his home in San Diego and believes he could bolster a Yankees New York Yankees rotation suddenly besieged by question marks.

In case you needed a chuckle.

--Posted at 12:34 pm by Jonathan / 14 Comments | - (433)




Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Courant.com: Yankees Rotation Forced To Regroup

NEW YORK - Though the Yankees (17-16) showed significant fight over the weekend, shaking their hitting funk and sweeping the Mariners to recoup the three losses to the Tigers last week, there are serious questions about their starting rotation.

At the moment, it’s Andy Pettitte, Mike Mussina and Chien-Ming Wang - then everything goes wrong. It was enough to have co-chairman Hank Steinbrenner, who was talked out of trading Hughes and Kennedy for Johan Santana, doubting the Yankees can make the playoffs in his most recent rant.

“You’d like for things to go exactly the way you planned it,” general manager Brian Cashman said, “but if you truly have a strong organization, then when someone struggles, there is going to be someone else you can turn to.”

On Sunday, that candidate was Darrell Rasner, a career minor leaguer who replaced Kennedy and threw six innings to get a win. So for this week Rasner’s in, but a No.5 starter hasn’t been identified, with Kei Igawa the logical but far-from-inspiring option.

You can’t be upset with what Wang, Mussina, and Pettitte have given the team.  Everything Moose has provided is almost enough to make you forget about the Hughes and Kennedy starts.  Almost.  But if Kei Igawa ends up starting for this team at any point this season it may get ugly.  Really ugly.

--Posted at 10:47 am by Jonathan / 45 Comments | - (274)




Friday, March 28, 2008

Looking Ahead to 2008 - Pitcher and Team Wrapup

We're finally through all the projections so it's time to look at what they mean. First up, here are the links to all the pieces for anyone who wants to get caught up.

Position Players
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Jorge Posada
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Jason Giambi
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Robinson Cano
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Derek Jeter
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Alex Rodriguez
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Johnny Damon
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Melky Cabrera
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Bobby Abreu
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Hideki Matsui
Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Bench

Pitchers
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Chien-Ming Wang
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Andy Pettitte
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Mike Mussina
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Phil Hughes
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Ian Kennedy
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Joba Chamberlain
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Mariano Rivera
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Kyle Farnsworth and LaTroy Hawkins
Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Rest of the Pen

If you've been keeping up with these you'll recall that I projected the position players and bench to score 938 runs in 2008 using estimated playing time and depth charts. I projected their defense to be about 13 runs below average. For the pitching, that's a little bit trickier, so I'm going to present two scenarios.

Scenario 1
In this scenario, I'm going to assume that everything that I think the Yankees are planning for falls into place fairly well. This is basically the best case scenario assuming everyone plays to their average projections and innings limits.

Starters IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Chien-Ming Wang 200 215 97 90 95 13 58 97 4.05
Andy Pettitte 200 220 103 94 98 19 62 137 4.25
Phil Hughes 160 152 78 72 77 16 57 129 4.07
Ian Kennedy 170 170 89 82 91 20 67 130 4.35
Mike Mussina 150 170 83 77 75 18 38 103 4.61
Joba ChamberlainS 100 94 47 43 45 11 33 99 3.90
Starters Total 980 1020 498 459 482 98 314 696 4.22
Relievers IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Mariano Rivera 70 64 24 22 23 4 15 60 2.88
Joba ChamberlainR 40 34 15 14 16 4 14 48 3.10
Kyle Farnsworth 60 57 30 28 31 7 25 55 4.19
LaTroy Hawkins 60 66 31 29 32 6 20 34 4.36
Chris Britton 40 39 19 18 20 5 13 31 3.99
Brian Bruney 40 39 23 22 24 5 23 33 4.88
Edwar Ramirez 40 37 20 18 19 5 18 44 4.12
Ross OhlendorfR 40 44 21 19 23 6 13 27 4.37
Jonathan Albaladejo 40 41 22 20 23 6 14 30 4.59
Scott Patterson 40 40 20 19 20 5 12 33 4.23
Relievers Total 470 461 226 209 231 53 169 396 4.01
IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Starters + Relievers 1450 1481 723 669 713 151 483 1092 4.15
Average 1450 1513 783 720 769 163 535 1070 4.47
Difference 0 -32 60 51 57 -12 -52 22 -0.32


FR in the table above is FIP(fielding independent pitching) runs allowed, which is an approximation of what the Yankee pitchers would allow with an average defense. You can probably move the innings around in the pen but most of the relievers project fairly closely to each other so it shouldn't make a ton of difference. In this scenario, the Yankees as a team would allow 723 runs in total, with the defense being responsible for about ten of them.

Scenario 2
Starters IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Chien-Ming Wang 180 193 87 81 86 12 52 87 4.05
Andy Pettitte 160 176 83 75 79 16 50 110 4.25
Phil Hughes 150 143 73 68 73 15 53 121 4.07
Ian Kennedy 150 150 78 73 80 17 59 115 4.35
Mike Mussina 150 170 83 77 75 18 38 103 4.61
Kei Igawa 100 111 62 58 62 17 36 73 5.26
Jeff Karstens 90 105 60 56 58 15 33 53 5.56
Joba ChamberlainS 70 65 33 30 31 8 23 69 3.90
Starters Total 1050 1113 560 518 544 118 344 731 4.44
Relievers IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Mariano Rivera 60 55 21 19 19 4 13 52 2.88
Joba ChamberlainR 30 25 11 10 12 3 11 36 3.10
Kyle Farnsworth 50 47 25 23 26 6 21 46 4.19
LaTroy Hawkins 50 55 26 24 27 5 17 29 4.36
Chris Britton 30 29 14 13 15 3 10 24 3.99
Brian Bruney 30 29 17 16 18 4 18 25 4.88
Edwar Ramirez 30 27 15 14 15 4 13 33 4.12
Ross OhlendorfR 30 33 16 15 18 4 10 20 4.37
Jonathan Albaladejo 30 31 16 15 17 4 11 22 4.59
Scott Patterson 30 30 15 14 15 4 9 25 4.23
Sean Henn 30 33 19 17 18 4 15 20 5.24
Relievers Total 400 396 196 182 199 45 147 331 4.09
IP H R ER FR HR BB SO ERA
Starters + Relievers 1450 1509 756 700 742 163 490 1063 4.34
Average 1450 1513 783 720 769 163 535 1070 4.47
Difference 0 -4 27 20 27 0 -45 -7 -0.12


Here the assumption is the Yankees lose some time from their penciled-in starters and have to give Igawa and Karstens 190 innings. Sean Henn makes an appearance in the pen as well and the better-projected relievers pitch a little less. It should be noted that any or all of the pitchers could also pitch worse than projected, so this is not exactly the worst-case scenario by any means. I'd consider this more of a realistic/likely scenario assuming average fortune with health and performance. Here the Yankees as a team allow 783 runs, with 14 of them due to the defense.

So we have a runs scored of 938, and two different runs allowed totals. I'll use Pythagenpat to estimate the Yankees' schedule-neutral winning percentage. Pythagenpat is a more accurate way to estimate a team's pythagorean winning percentage by using a custom exponent instead of either the standard 2 or slightly more accurate 1.83. The formula to get the custom exponent is (RS/G + RA/G)^.28. Then we take RS^custom exponent and divide by (RS^custom exponent + RA^custom exponent).

Scenario 1
Runs Scored: 938
Runs Allowed: 723
Exponent: 1.92
Pythagenpat%: .62
Neutral Schedule Wins: 101

Scenario 2
Runs Scored: 938
Runs Allowed: 783
Exponent: 1.94
Pythagenpat%: .59
Neutral Schedule Wins: 95

We're not quite done yet, because now we have to look at the strength of the Yankees' schedule. Thankfully someone already did this on a post related to my Diamond Mind projections on Baseball Think Factory.

The AL East minus the Yanks has an expected winning percentage of .523. If we use Bill James's log 5 method to calculate the Yankees' expected winning percentage over their AL East games we get a winning percentage of .598 for scenario 1 and a winning percentage of .568 for scenario 2. I'm going to assume the rest of the schedule is .500 which is probably lazy but should be close enough with the margin of error.

Scenario 1: .598*76 + .62* 86 = 98.7 wins
Scenario 2: .568*76 + .59* 86 = 93.8 wins

I'm going to assume that the Yankees' luck will fall somewhere between scenarios 1 and 2. Split the difference and they should end up at 96 wins. Of course this depends on the key players staying healthy and hitting their projections, but on paper this is a very good team. Let's hope they show it starting Monday. The long off-season is almost over. Thanks to everyone who's stopped by over the last few months. Writing the blog and having people read and comment makes the off-season go by much faster for me.

Update: My Hardball Times' season preview for the Yankees has been posted on their site today for anyone who wants to check it out. Link: Five Questions: New York Yankees

--Posted at 8:52 am by SG / 38 Comments | - (957)




Thursday, March 27, 2008

Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Rest of the Pen

I've pretty much hit the key pitchers on the Yankees individually, so now it's time to close out the Looking Ahead to 2008 series with the guys in the back of the bullpen. THere's quite a few candidates for just a few slots, so I'll just give the projections and a little summary about each guy.

Jonathan Albaladejo
Jonathan Albaladejo G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 37 2 59 64 33 31 7 23 45 4.73 4.39 -2 4 0 5
marcel 17 10 32 30 15 14 3 11 25 3.94 3.89 2 5 2 4
pecota 49 4 58 59 31 28 7 23 40 4.36 4.57 1 6 -1 4
zips 42 2 75 79 46 42 15 25 56 5.04 5.31 -5 3 -8 -2
cairo 18 0 29 27 14 14 4 9 21 4.34 4.48 0 3 0 2
average 33 3 51 52 28 26 7 18 37 4.59 4.65 -1 4 -2 3
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 18 0 29 22 10 10 2 6 26 3.18 2.95 4 7 5 7
65% 18 0 29 24 12 12 3 8 23 3.76 3.71 2 5 2 5
Baseline 18 0 29 27 14 14 4 9 21 4.34 4.48 0 3 0 2
35% 18 0 29 30 16 16 5 11 19 4.93 5.24 -1 1 -3 0
20% 18 0 29 32 18 18 6 12 16 5.51 6.00 -3 0 -5 -3


RSAA: Runs saved above average
RSAR: Runs saved above replacement
FRSAA: FIP runs saved above average
FRSAR: FIP runs saved above replacement

Albaladejo came over from the Washington Nationals for Tyler Clippard in the offseason. According to his scouting report here his fastball has been clocked as high as 95 mph at times but varies a lot. His projections aren't particulary impressive, but he's relatively young and his stuff supposedly grades well. My guess is he won't break camp with the team but will see some time over the course of the season.

Chris Britton
Chris Britton G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 53 0 66 67 33 31 7 23 53 4.23 4.02 2 8 2 8
marcel 22 12 37 35 18 16 4 13 27 3.89 4.20 2 6 1 4
pecota 51 2 56 55 29 27 7 22 42 4.26 4.60 1 7 -2 3
zips 56 0 78 74 35 32 9 22 67 3.69 3.83 7 14 5 11
cairo 35 0 51 52 23 22 5 14 37 3.88 3.85 3 8 3 7
average 44 3 58 57 28 26 6 19 45 3.99 4.07 3 9 2 7
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 35 0 51 45 18 17 3 10 43 3.05 2.82 8 13 9 13
65% 35 0 51 48 21 20 4 12 40 3.47 3.33 6 11 6 10
Baseline 35 0 51 52 23 22 5 14 37 3.88 3.85 3 8 3 7
35% 35 0 51 56 25 24 6 16 34 4.30 4.36 1 6 0 4
20% 35 0 51 59 28 27 7 18 31 4.71 4.88 -1 4 -3 1


There must be something about Britton that the Yankees don't like. He's done nothing but get batters out in the minors (2.90 ERA) and majors (3.39 ERA) but he only got 12.2 innings with the Yanks in 2007 and has been assigned to Scranton to start the season. He's in a similar situation as Albaladejo I"d guess, competing for the role of first callup.

Brian Bruney
Brian Bruney G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 51 0 50 50 28 26 6 27 43 4.68 4.66 -1 4 -2 3
marcel 43 18 52 50 28 26 5 28 44 4.50 4.37 0 5 0 4
pecota 27 0 30 27 16 15 4 19 27 4.60 4.86 0 3 -2 1
zips 62 0 61 62 39 36 8 37 48 5.31 5.15 -6 0 -5 0
cairo 41 0 42 40 25 24 5 27 34 5.14 5.06 -3 1 -3 0
average 45 4 47 46 27 25 6 28 39 4.88 4.82 -2 3 -2 2
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 41 0 42 34 20 19 3 22 40 4.09 3.72 2 6 3 7
65% 41 0 42 37 23 22 4 24 37 4.62 4.39 -1 3 0 3
Baseline 41 0 42 40 25 24 5 27 34 5.14 5.06 -3 1 -3 0
35% 41 0 42 43 28 26 6 30 31 5.67 5.73 -6 -1 -6 -3
20% 41 0 42 46 30 29 7 32 28 6.19 6.40 -8 -4 -10 -6


Great fastball, awful command. Bruney lost about 20 lbs this offseason AND grew a mullet. If Bruney can throw with better control he could be great in the pen, but to this point there's nothing in his track record that suggests he will. If he does what he's projected, he's a below average reliever, but he has the talent to be better than that and he's young enough that improvement is a very real possibility.

Sean Henn
Sean Henn G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 33 9 70 79 44 41 9 33 49 5.27 4.89 -6 1 -4 2
marcel 20 13 47 51 30 28 6 23 35 5.36 4.84 -5 0 -3 1
pecota 39 1 43 43 25 23 5 21 31 4.72 4.73 -1 3 -2 2
zips 32 12 90 101 58 53 11 43 55 5.30 5.00 -8 1 -7 1
cairo 20 3 38 45 25 23 4 20 25 5.45 4.83 -4 0 -2 1
average 29 8 58 64 36 34 7 28 39 5.24 4.88 -5 1 -3 2
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 20 3 38 38 20 18 2 16 30 4.31 3.53 1 4 3 7
65% 20 3 38 42 23 21 3 18 28 4.88 4.18 -2 2 1 4
Baseline 20 3 38 45 25 23 4 20 25 5.45 4.83 -4 0 -2 1
35% 20 3 38 48 28 25 5 22 23 6.02 5.48 -7 -3 -5 -2
20% 20 3 38 52 30 28 6 24 20 6.58 6.13 -9 -5 -8 -4


I'm only listing him here because he's still in the organization. He is expected to start the season on the DL, but I don't see a spot for him when he comes off. Unfortunately for Henn, Tommy John surgery robbed him of some of his velocity and he hasn't been able to compensate by improving his secondary pitches or throwing more strikes. Those projections are decidedly ugly.

Kei Igawa
Kei Igawa G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 26 26 155 174 95 88 24 60 121 5.11 4.81 -11 4 -8 5
marcel 16 15 89 96 54 52 14 40 67 5.26 5.09 -8 1 -7 0
pecota 33 13 90 98 56 52 14 38 67 5.16 4.92 -7 2 -6 2
zips 27 26 168 188 108 97 29 53 114 5.20 5.03 -14 3 -13 2
cairo 21 20 132 151 83 82 28 38 93 5.59 5.41 -16 -3 -16 -4
average 25 20 127 141 79 74 22 46 92 5.26 5.05 -11 1 -10 1
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 21 20 132 139 74 73 23 32 103 4.97 4.60 -7 6 -4 8
65% 21 20 132 145 78 77 25 35 98 5.28 5.01 -12 1 -10 2
Baseline 21 20 132 151 83 82 28 38 93 5.59 5.41 -16 -3 -16 -4
35% 21 20 132 157 88 87 31 41 88 5.90 5.82 -21 -8 -21 -10
20% 21 20 132 163 92 91 33 44 83 6.21 6.22 -25 -12 -27 -16


Not sure what to say about Igawa except that the more he pitches in the bigs this year, the more trouble the Yankees will obviously be in. Unless he can consistently keep the ball down he'll keep giving up too many HRs.

Jeff Karstens
Jeff Karstens G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 23 20 110 129 71 66 17 43 66 5.40 5.18 -11 0 -10 -1
marcel 13 11 56 61 34 31 7 21 35 4.98 4.70 -3 2 -2 3
pecota 31 10 82 96 59 55 15 36 48 6.01 5.72 -14 -6 -12 -5
zips 28 26 160 190 111 101 30 49 91 5.68 5.42 -22 -6 -19 -5
cairo 10 8 50 58 31 30 8 17 30 5.40 5.10 -5 0 -4 0
average 21 15 92 107 61 57 15 33 54 5.56 5.29 -11 -2 -10 -2
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 10 8 50 50 25 25 5 13 35 4.41 3.90 0 5 3 7
65% 10 8 50 54 28 27 7 15 33 4.91 4.50 -2 3 -1 3
Baseline 10 8 50 58 31 30 8 17 30 5.40 5.10 -5 0 -4 0
35% 10 8 50 62 34 33 9 19 27 5.89 5.70 -8 -3 -8 -3
20% 10 8 50 66 37 35 11 21 25 6.39 6.30 -11 -6 -11 -7


Karstens is kind of in the same boat as Henn Igawa. He's on the team and he'll probably get some time this year, but it won't be good if he does.

Ross Ohlendorf
Ross Ohlendorf G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 26 17 109 135 74 68 16 42 66 5.61 5.05 -14 -3 -9 1
marcel 7 6 28 28 14 13 3 10 22 4.18 4.09 1 4 1 3
pecota 26 7 63 79 45 42 9 24 37 5.94 5.08 -10 -4 -5 0
zips 27 23 162 198 105 96 24 42 81 5.33 4.90 -16 1 -10 4
cairo 23 16 109 141 68 67 17 29 60 5.53 4.92 -13 -2 -7 2
average 22 14 94 116 61 57 14 29 53 5.46 4.92 -10 -1 -6 2
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 23 16 109 129 60 59 13 24 68 4.86 4.14 -5 6 3 12
65% 23 16 109 135 64 63 15 26 64 5.19 4.53 -9 2 -2 7
Baseline 23 16 109 141 68 67 17 29 60 5.53 4.92 -13 -2 -7 2
35% 23 16 109 147 72 71 19 32 56 5.87 5.32 -17 -6 -12 -2
20% 23 16 109 153 76 75 21 34 52 6.21 5.71 -21 -10 -16 -7
Relief Projection G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
65 0 71 78 37 34 10 24 47 4.37 4.79 -8 -1 -4 2


Ohlendorf's projections are pretty bad, but if we convert them to relief they're not that bad. He doesn't have much experience coming of the pen yet but I think with some work in AAA he could possibly be a big contributor in the second half. He has very good stuff coming out of the pen.

Scott Patterson
Scott Patterson G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 35 2 48 51 27 25 5 20 41 4.69 4.10 -1 4 1 5
zips 41 0 52 52 26 24 7 14 43 4.15 4.10 2 7 1 6
cairo 39 2 64 63 29 28 8 17 51 3.94 4.03 4 10 2 8
average 23 1 33 33 16 15 4 10 27 4.23 4.07 1 4 1 4
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 39 2 64 55 24 23 5 13 58 3.19 3.04 9 15 9 15
65% 39 2 64 59 26 25 7 15 55 3.57 3.53 6 13 6 11
Baseline 39 2 64 63 29 28 8 17 51 3.94 4.03 4 10 2 8
35% 39 2 64 67 32 31 9 19 47 4.31 4.52 1 7 -1 4
20% 39 2 64 71 34 33 11 21 44 4.68 5.02 -2 5 -5 1


Patterson came out of the independent leagues and put up a very good year in Trenton last year. His stuff isn't overwhelming, but he has very good deception with his delivery and frame and has excelled this spring. While spring training status are too small of a sample to make any definitive assessment of a player's ability, Patterson has looked really good.

Edwar Ramirez
Edwar Ramirez G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 40 0 53 46 23 21 5 23 64 3.57 3.31 5 11 6 11
marcel 24 13 35 37 21 20 5 15 31 5.14 4.57 -3 1 -1 2
pecota 58 1 61 48 26 24 7 31 76 3.61 3.65 6 12 5 10
zips 49 0 64 64 37 34 11 27 65 4.78 4.67 -2 4 -2 3
cairo 21 0 33 29 14 13 4 13 37 3.55 3.72 3 7 2 5
average 38 3 49 45 24 22 6 22 55 4.12 3.98 2 7 2 6
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 21 0 33 24 10 9 2 9 43 2.56 2.23 7 10 8 11
65% 21 0 33 26 12 11 3 11 40 3.05 2.97 5 8 5 8
Baseline 21 0 33 29 14 13 4 13 37 3.55 3.72 3 7 2 5
35% 21 0 33 32 16 15 5 15 34 4.04 4.46 2 5 0 2
20% 21 0 33 34 18 17 6 17 31 4.53 5.20 0 3 -3 0


Another Indy league signing, Edwar has an outstanding changeup which he used to good effect to tear up the minors last year. At the major league level Edwar struggled last year and will likely continue to struggle until he is able to better set up the changeup by getting ahead in the count with his fastball and slider. His fastball is about 88-90, which is fine if he can put it where he wants. Hell, it's worked for Trevor Hoffman for a long time. His projections aren't too bad, but I think his MLEs probably overstate his ability against major leaguers and he needs some more time in the minors to get his fastball command where it needs to be.

Darrell Rasner
Darrell Rasner G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 17 14 73 87 45 42 10 23 41 5.18 4.80 -6 2 -4 3
marcel 21 14 64 66 34 31 7 22 43 4.36 4.31 1 7 0 6
pecota 22 8 60 71 38 35 8 21 30 5.24 5.01 -5 1 -4 1
zips 23 19 114 135 71 65 15 27 54 5.13 4.67 -8 3 -4 6
cairo 8 7 38 44 22 21 5 11 22 4.97 4.62 -2 2 -1 2
average 18 12 70 81 42 39 9 21 38 5.00 4.69 -4 3 -3 3
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 8 7 38 37 17 16 3 8 27 3.89 3.35 2 6 4 7
65% 8 7 38 41 20 19 4 9 24 4.43 3.98 0 4 2 5
Baseline 8 7 38 44 22 21 5 11 22 4.97 4.62 -2 2 -1 2
35% 8 7 38 47 24 23 6 13 20 5.52 5.26 -4 -1 -4 -1
20% 8 7 38 51 27 26 7 14 17 6.06 5.89 -7 -3 -7 -3


Rasner's a guy who probably deserves a role in the majors somewhere as a swingman. He doesn't have much upside but he's above replacement level. If the Yankees are insistent on taking a long man, he's a better choice than Karstens or Igawa IMO.

Billy Traber
Billy Traber G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 34 15 107 117 57 53 12 33 71 4.46 4.26 0 11 1 10
marcel 16 11 56 63 32 30 6 20 39 4.82 4.27 -2 3 0 5
pecota 28 3 40 45 23 21 5 14 26 4.65 4.54 -1 3 -1 3
zips 35 19 133 150 82 75 19 40 64 5.08 5.00 -9 4 -10 2
cairo 22 10 77 87 41 40 8 22 51 4.68 4.08 -2 6 2 9
average 27 12 83 92 47 44 10 26 50 4.77 4.49 -3 5 -1 6
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 22 10 77 78 35 34 5 17 58 3.94 3.24 5 12 10 16
65% 22 10 77 82 38 37 7 20 55 4.31 3.66 1 9 6 12
Baseline 22 10 77 87 41 40 8 22 51 4.68 4.08 -2 6 2 9
35% 22 10 77 92 44 43 9 24 47 5.04 4.51 -5 3 -1 5
20% 22 10 77 96 47 46 11 27 44 5.41 4.93 -8 0 -5 2
Career Splits AVG OBP SLG PA AB H 2B 3B HR BB K HR/BF BB/BF K/BF
Overall .299 .361 .461 887 786 235 53 1 24 67 140 0.03 0.08 0.16
Vs RHB .329 .382 .512 655 586 193 45 1 20 44 87 0.03 0.07 0.13
Vs LHB .210 .303 .310 232 200 42 8 0 4 23 53 0.02 0.10 0.23
Platoon Differential 157% 126% 165% 177% 68% 172%
Projected Splits AVG OBP SLG PA AB H 2B 3B HR BB K HR/BF BB/BF K/BF
Overall .292 .343 .442 391 355 104 20 1 11 26 56 0.03 0.07 0.14
Vs RHB .321 .366 .491 289 265 85 17 1 9 17 35 0.03 0.06 0.12
Vs LHB .205 .280 .298 102 90 19 3 0 2 9 21 0.02 0.09 0.21
Platoon Differential 157% 130% 165% 177% 68% 172%


Billy Traber is a failed starter who's always done pretty well against lefties. He's been added to the 40 man roster and it looks like he has a very good chance to make the team. I added his projected lines against LHB and RHB, which I calculated by using his projected overall line against and then applying his career platoon ratios to it. If he really can hold lefties to a .205/.280/.298 then he's a very good tactical option in a role where he has to get a key lefty out. What's scary is righties hit him like 2006 Robinson Cano.

Jose Veras
Jose Veras G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
chone 40 0 44 45 24 22 5 20 37 4.50 4.36 0 4 0 4
marcel 26 12 31 30 17 16 3 12 22 4.65 4.20 -1 2 1 3
pecota 41 2 47 48 27 25 5 24 39 4.66 4.41 -1 4 0 4
zips 54 0 61 67 38 35 9 25 41 5.16 5.00 -5 1 -4 1
cairo 24 0 33 36 17 17 4 13 26 4.64 4.38 -1 3 0 3
average 37 3 43 45 25 23 5 19 33 4.76 4.53 -1 3 -1 3
CAIRO % G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO ERA FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR
80% 24 0 33 30 13 13 2 9 31 3.51 2.96 4 7 5 8
65% 24 0 33 33 15 15 3 11 29 4.07 3.67 1 5 2 5
Baseline 24 0 33 36 17 17 4 13 26 4.64 4.38 -1 3 0 3
35% 24 0 33 39 19 19 5 15 23 5.20 5.09 -3 1 -3 0
20% 24 0 33 42 21 21 6 17 21 5.76 5.81 -5 -1 -5 -3


Veras is basically the same story as Bruney, with maybe a little less velocity and a little bit better breaking pitch. He's another guy who can't seem to put the ball where he wants and unless he can learn to do that he's not much more than a back-end of the pen guy.

The Yankees are likely going with 12 man pitching staff this year. Here are the guys who seemingly have spots locked up:

SP - Wang
SP - Pettitte
SP - Mussina
SP - Hughes
SP - Kennedy
CL - Mo
SU - Joba
MR - Farnsworth
MR - Hawkins

That's nine, which leaves 3 more slots open. WIth Hughes and Kennedy's workload being closely monitored one slot should go to a longman, which is probably Rasner. They may not take Traber, but I can't see why they wouldn't, so that leaves one more slot to one of Albaladejo, Britton, Bruney, Ohlendorf, Patterson, Ramirez or Veras. I am fairly certain that all but Bruney have options so that may end up keeping Bruney on the team, although injuries and/or ineffectiveness will surely lead to some shuffling along the way. Based on the projections the best of the group is Britton, although the difference between him, Patterson and Ramriez is negligble.

Conclusion
There's some intriguing talent in some of the names listed above, but a lot of uncertainty about how good they may be in 2008. My WAG is they go with Bruney, Traber, and Rasner. One thing the Yankees should have is the flexibility to mix and match with people until they find a combination that works, and hopefully with Joe Girardi they have a manager who's willing to be flexibile with his bullpen.

Tomorrow I wrap up the pitching staff and look at how the Yankees as a team project.

--Posted at 8:45 am by SG / 24 Comments | - (752)




Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Newsday - O’Brien: Four combine for five perfect innings

DUNEDIN, Fla. - Phil Hughes got pulled from a perfect game again yesterday.

OK, so this one - a spring training game in which he didn’t continue after a rain delay in the second inning - had little or nothing in common with the no-hitter he had going in Texas last year in his second major-league game when he pulled a hamstring in the seventh inning. But this one was also different in that Yankees pitchers Scott Patterson, Kei Igawa and Billy Traber finished off the rain-shortened perfect game, a 2-0, five-inning win over Toronto.

The Yankees are a juggernaut. For those worried about Mike Mussina after a bad spring training outing, are you excited because of Kei Igawa’s two perfect innings?  Patterson and Traber are in the bullpen mix so this game probably helps them in the pecking order.  I like Patterson’s chances of being useful.  Traber, I’m not so sure…

--Posted at 9:15 am by SG / 42 Comments | - (867)




Sunday, December 23, 2007

Johan and the AL East

Johan Santana continues to be a topic of discussion during the Hot Stove season. Although there are probably other teams in the mix, the most likely scenario sees him going to either Boston or the Yankees, with Boston the probable favorite right now. Long-time lurker and first-time poster plank asked:

I'd love to see the standing simulations done with the proposed yankees and red sox trades for Santana. How far ahead would the Sox be with him? Would the Yankees pull ahead with Johan?


Since I take requests, I ran three sets of Diamond Mind Simulations, with three hypothetical scenarios:

Scenario 1
Santana to the Yankees for Phil Hughes and Melky Cabrera. While the Yankees would likely have to include other prospects in the deal, I don't have any idea which prospects they would be so I left that out of the equation.

Scenario 2
Santana to Boston for Jacoby Ellsbury and Jed Lowrie. Same deal with the prospects here.

Scenario 3
Santana to Boston for Jon Lester and Jed Lowrie. Same deal again with the prospects.

First off, let's revisit the CAIRO/Diamond Mind simulations with no trades.

Team W L RF RA Div WC
Bos08 97.0 65.0 879 716 50 30
NYA08 96.1 65.9 941 769 45 34
Tor08 87.1 74.9 804 741 6 14
Tam08 78.1 83.9 820 848 0 1
Bal08 69.1 92.9 785 912 0 0


So this is our baseline to see what kind of a difference Santana would make, although I think it's a little bullish on the Yankees..

Let's look at scenario 1 first.

Team W L RF RA Div WC
NYA08 97.6 64.4 942 758 56 28
Bos08 96.1 65.9 869 708 38 44
Tor08 86.3 75.7 802 747 7 12
Tam08 78.3 83.7 824 851 0 1
Bal08 69.7 92.3 786 908 0 0


Getting Santana improved the Yankees by 11 runs allowed, and 1.5 wins. It took them from a 45% chance of winning the division to a 56% chance. This doesn't mean that Santana was only worth 11 runs above Phil Hughes, but it does mean this:

a) 220 innings of Santana vs. 160 innings of Phil Hughes plus 60 innings of Kei Igawa = 30 run upgrade.
b) Moving Johnny Damon to CF to replace Melky = -10 runs saved defensively (range plus arm)
c) Moving Hideki Matsui to LF instead of DH = -9 runs saved defensively
d) More AB for Jason Giambi and Brett Gardner, who would probably be the fourth OF if Melky gets traded= no net change in runs scored. Any upgrade from Giambi playing more (although I still restricted his playing time to about 300 PA per season) would be mitigated by more PA from Gardner.

So the Yankees upgrade their pitching by 30 runs and downgrade their defense by 19 runs, an 11 run overall improvement.

For Scenario 2 here's what happened:

Team W L RF RA Div WC
Bos08 99.7 62.3 883 691 61 22
NYA08 95.1 66.9 936 773 31 44
Tor08 87.1 74.9 811 748 7 15
Tam08 77.9 84.1 823 857 1 1
Bal08 68.8 93.3 792 922 0 0


Santana to Boston for Ellsbury+ improves Boston's pitching by about 25 runs (mainly replacing Wakefield and Lester innings). It changes them from a projected 97 wins to a projected 99.7 wins and improves their odds of winning the AL East to 61%. It's also worth noting that the Yankees got a win worse, ostensibly because they'd face Santana 3-5 times a season.

Lastly, scenario 3:

Team W L RF RA Div WC
Bos08 99.7 62.3 881 684 66 25
NYA08 95.7 66.3 937 775 30 50
Tor08 86.6 75.4 807 747 5 16
Tam08 77.4 84.6 824 857 0 1
Bal08 70.4 91.6 797 911 0 0


In this instance, Boston saved even more runs as they lost more innings by Lester and kept Ellsbury AND Coco Crisp which gave them a better defense when they were able to play the two together. This scenario improves the Red Sox's chances at the AL East to 66%.

So put it all together and what does it mean? Santana makes the Yankees a slightly better team than Boston although the difference is fairly small. If Boston gets Santana in either case, they gain a 3 win advantage on the Yankees. It is worth noting that the Yankees are still the second-most likely favorites to make the playoffs but once they get there they'd be staring at the specter of matching up against Santana and Beckett.

--Posted at 11:52 am by SG / 23 Comments | - (1328)




Thursday, September 27, 2007

Picking the 2007 Postseason Roster

Now that the Yankees are officially in the playoffs, I can finally talk about the postseason roster.  With the injuries to Carl Pavano, Darrell Rasner, Humberto Sanchez, and Andy Phillips, the Yankees basically have the flexibility to use anyone they want from their 40 man roster.  Here’s a look at the candidates, with the players on the bubble separated out.

Starting Pitchers(4)
Andy Pettitte
Roger Clemens
Chien-Ming Wang
Mike Mussina

Relief Pitchers(5)
Mariano Rivera
Joba Chamberlain
Phil Hughes
Kyle Farnsworth
Luis Vizcaino

On the Bubble
Chris Britton
Brian Bruney
Tyler Clippard
Matt DeSalvo
Chase Wright
Jose Veras
Ron Villone
Sean Henn
Kei Igawa
Jeff Karstens
Ian Kennedy
Ross Ohlendorf
Edwar Ramirez

Catchers(2)
Jose Molina
Jorge Posada

Infielders(5)
Robinson Cano
Derek Jeter
Doug Mientkiewicz
Alex Rodriguez
Wilson Betemit

On the Bubble
Alberto Gonzalez

Outfielders (5)
Bobby Abreu
Melky Cabrera
Johnny Damon
Shelley Duncan
Hideki Matsui

On the Bubble
Bronson Sardinha

Designated Hitters(1)
Jason Giambi

There are 22 players I consider locks to make the roster, four starting pitchers, five relievers, two catchers, five infielders, five outfielders, and one DH.  That gives the Yanks three slots to fill.  If it were up to me, I’d take two more pitchers and one position player. 

The position player seems like an easy choice to me, if choosing between Alberto Gonzalez or Bronson Sardinha I’d take the more valuable defensive player.  Either can pinch-run, but Gonzalez gives the Yankees a little more depth in case of multiple injuries to their starting infielders.

The pitching situation is a little less clear-cut.  Phil Hughes slots in as a long reliever, but the rest of the choices are mainly short relievers and that’s a concern with a gimpy Roger Clemens and Mike “Box of Chocolates” Mussina taking two starts.  Because of this, one of the extra relievers should probably be someone who can pitch multiple innings.  Out of the players on the bubble, the best choices for that kind of role in my mind are Kei Igawa or Ron Villone.  Neither inspires much confidence, but we have to remember that you don’t have to win every single game in the playoffs, you just have to win 3 or 4 before your opponent does.  If Clemens can’t go past the second inning, odds are the game is lost but you don’t want to have to burn out your bullpen either.  The off days built into the schedule mitigate that to some degree.  The other thing the Yankees should do is break up Pettitte and Wang.  Since they’ll be starting on the road, I’d start Pettitte in game one, Clemens in game two, and Wang in game three at home.  However, to be safe I think the Yankees should take Igawa.  I know he hasn’t been good this year, but he could come into a game in the early innings and pitch 5 or 6 innings and put the Yankees in a position to win the next game.  Now all the readers can proceed to tell me I’m insane.

That leaves one other pitcher to take.  Ian Kennedy’s hurt so scratch him.  Realistically it comes down to taking one of Chris Britton, Brian Bruney, Jose Veras, Villone, Ross Ohlendorf or Edwar Ramirez.

Britton - had success in the AL East last year and did well in AAA this season.  For whatever reason he doesn’t seem to be well-regarded by the organization right now, and his stuff isn’t really that great for a short reliever.

Bruney - You know the deal with this guy.  Great fastball, horrendous command.

Veras - See Bruney, although with a slightly better breaking pitch.  I swear I have not seen Veras hit the catcher’s target on a single pitch yet this season.

Villone - Chock full of veterany-goodness.  Hasn’t been horrible this year, but his control scares the hell out of me and he has a very high likelihood to implode in any given outing.

Ohlendorf - He’s looked pretty good so far in the majors, but it’s only been three innings.  He’s got good stuff but his minor league numbers are pretty bad, but he was injured for much of the year and converted from a starter to a reliever so that should be considered.

Ramirez - I was pulling like hell for Edwar to come up the majors and succeed, but he still needs to work on his approach IMO.  Until he can consistently get ahead in the count and make optimal use of his killer changeup, I wouldn’t have any faith in him in a tight spot.  He does have strikeout ability (29 Ks in 19.3 innings), but he also has giving up HR ability (6 in 19.3 innings).  He’s probably pitched himself off the postseason roster at this point.

Not a very inspiring bunch.  I’d imagine we’ll get a healthy dose of all of these guys over the last four games of the year to see if one becomes a hot hand.  I find Ohlendorf the most intriguing of this group, so he’d probably be my pick.

I’d like to see what other people would do instead of me, so let’s hear it…

--Posted at 8:08 am by SG / 67 Comments | - (1735)




Wednesday, September 26, 2007

The Waiting…

As frustrating as last night’s 7-6 loss to Tampa Bay was, in the big picture it’s just a speed bump.  The Yankees aren’t winning the AL East this year, and honestly, it doesn’t matter all that much anymore given the way MLB is currently structured.  I think that’s unfortunate, but I have no say in it.

For the Yankees to miss the postseason now, they would have to lose five straight games to Tampa Bay and Baltimore while Detroit wins five straight games against Minnesota and the White Sox.  If both of those things happened, then the Yankees would host Detroit for a play-in game for the rights to go to the postseason.  If the Yankees can’t take advantage of this scenario at some point, then getting to the postseason seems like a waste of time anyway.

What was scary about last night’s game was the continued ineffectiveness of Edwar Ramirez and Brian Bruney.  I don’t want to talk about the potential postseason roster yet because I’m superstitious, but the back-end of the bullpen is starting to look problematic for a meaningful October run, especially with the question marks surrounding both Roger Clemens and Mike Mussina.

Anyway, last night’s game sucked, but at least Jeff Karstens made it quick.  Besides, who wanted to see the Yankees clinch a postseason berth in a game started by Kei Igawa?

--Posted at 7:21 am by SG / 91 Comments | - (1153)




Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Lohud Yankees Blog - Abraham:  Breaking news: Clemens scratched again

The Yankees just announced that Roger Clemens (left hamstring) has been scratched from tonight’s game and will not pitch in this series.

He has been replaced by LHP Kei Igawa.

--Posted at 4:00 pm by SG / 13 Comments | - (479)




Monday, August 27, 2007

So, who gets Moose’s spot in the Rotation?

Obviously, Mike Mussina was again awful tonight. With the Yankees in jeopardy of missing the postseason, it's very likely that they may not risk running him out there again in his next turn.

So that of course begs the question, who can start in his stead? According to Jayson Stark, the following pitchers have cleared waivers:
Steve Trachsel, Jose Contreras, Josh Towers, Odalis Perez.

None of those guys seem like much of a choice, so here's a list of the possible in-house candidates and their MLEs (major league equivlancies) plus any time they've spent in the majors this year.

Last First W L S ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO
*Kennedy Ian 8 7 0 4.15 26 25 141 131 65 14 66 109
*White Steven 4 6 0 5.01 17 16 97 113 54 11 34 41
DeSalvo Matt 6 10 0 5.02 25 24 127 135 71 11 73 74
Wright Chase 7 12 0 6.25 26 25 144 171 100 32 77 59
Igawa Kei 5 8 0 6.26 24 23 132 156 92 32 51 99
Clippard Tyler 6 7 0 6.37 24 24 113 134 80 22 67 69
*Not on 40 man roster

Ian Kennedy is the best option according to these numbers, but the Yankees are supposedly not considering him since he's up against an innings cap. Next up are Steven White and Matt DeSalvo. White has always had a reputation for having good stuff, but never the results to go with it. Also a consideration, neither Kennedy or White are on the 40 man roster so a move would have to be made. That's not a huge deal, I'm sure they can DFA someone like Jim Brower.

We've seen DeSalvo, Wright, Clippard, and Igawa and none have been very good. If I had to choose one of them I'd probably try Igawa again.

I suppose the Yankees should try White on the off-chance that unfamiliarity and plus stuff translates to a few good starts. Other than that, I'd run Igawa out there on the condition that he pitches six innings every start, regardless of how bad he is. The Yankees cannot afford to get three inning starts going forward.

Mussina's body has failed him. He lost his fastball, and he hasn't been able to compensate. It's not his fault, and I don't think his character should be criticized. I thought keeping Moose was a smart idea at the time, although I preferred the Yankees picking up his option and paying a bit more for a one year committment, in case this happened. He still projected to be at least an average starter this year.

The AL East race is basically over now. Unless the Yankees sweep Boston in the series starting tomorrow they don't have a chance. The playoff chase is still very much alive though, so I'm not about to give up on this team yet. .
--Posted at 9:16 pm by SG / 46 Comments | - (1084)




Sunday, July 29, 2007

Trade Winds Swirling

Lots of rumors out there, which probably doesn't mean anything. I personally feel that any trades the Yankees make now which do not make them younger and better prepared for 2008 on are like putting a Band Aid on a gunshot wound. This team stinks, and adding a short reliever or a bench player isn't going to change that fact.

Anyway: NY Post: FARNSWORTH, PROCTOR ARE LIKELY CHIPS
If the Yankees make a trade before Tuesday afternoon's deadline it's highly likely that Kyle Farnsworth and or Scott Proctor will be in it. And even if they aren't moved, neophyte Joba Chamberlain is a solid bet to be added to the bullpen mix as early as Tuesday.


I'd rather see Farnsworth moved than Proctor, but Proctor would bring back the better return.

Sherman: METS, YANKS AFTER GAGNE
The Yankees and Mets join the Red Sox as the teams still trying to land Rangers closer Eric Gagne as the trade deadline nears, The Post has learned.


Yeah, because the Yankees' biggest need is an 8th inning reliever who missed most of the last two seasons with arm injuries and who is even more fragile than Farnsworth. Gagne's rebuilt arm would never be able to withstand the Yankees' setup role, although considering how much the Yankees stink he probably wouldn't have to pitch all that much.

Heyman: Kei to the Mariners?
Word is, the Mariners were considering making a run at Kei Igawa, but their interest appears to have cooled after watching Igawa's latest disappointment, a four-inning outing in a 7-0 defeat to the Royals. While Igawa's been a disaster, the Yankees would want any acquiring team to pay part of the $26 million posting fee.


Finally, a trade rumor that has my complete and unconditional approval.

As you probably know, the Yankees lost to Baltimore again, 7-5 last night. It wasn't that close, the Yankees only managed to score when the Orioles put in a kid to close out a laugher. The Yankees are 2-6 against the Orioles this season. It was pretty fitting that the Yankees' rally fell short due to Johnny Damon and Bobby Abreu, as they are two of the biggest reasons the team has underachieved this year.

In wins this season, Damon is hitting .280/.394/.402 in 226 plate appearances. In losses, he's hitting .192/.270/.253 in 163 PA. Yep, in the games the Yankees have lost, the player who's been in the position to get the most plate appearances on the team in the games he starts is hitting .192/.270/.253. .192/.270/.253. In 1 and 2 run losses, Damon's hit .216/.341/.311 in 88 PA. Thanks for nothing Johnny.

Update: In the interest of full disclosure. Here's a look at the primary starters in wins and losses. As bad as Damon has been in losses, Bobby Abreu has been the player with the biggest disparity between his performances in Yankee wins and Yankee losses.

Player W/L PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO HB DP SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS BR+/- per 650 Ratio
Abreu W 247 214 55 78 14 2 7 48 27 31 2 6 10 4 .364 .449 .547 .996 15 40 3.98
Abreu L 204 179 17 27 8 0 1 11 21 47 1 4 4 0 .151 .255 .212 .467 -16 -51
Cabrera W 210 180 31 59 5 3 3 25 18 15 3 2 5 2 .328 .390 .439 .829 3 9 1.49
Cabrera L 161 145 9 34 7 2 2 13 10 24 1 6 4 0 .234 .304 .352 .656 -5 -21
Cano W 235 217 41 78 18 4 6 38 11 24 4 3 1 4 .359 .409 .562 .971 11 32 2.29
Cano L 191 179 13 40 9 1 2 15 10 35 1 6 1 0 .223 .272 .318 .591 -9 -32
Damon W 226 189 44 53 14 0 3 27 35 26 1 0 13 2 .280 .398 .402 .800 5 14 2.24
Damon L 163 146 12 28 1 1 2 9 16 25 0 2 6 0 .192 .276 .253 .529 -10 -39
Jeter W 265 236 50 89 15 3 4 37 22 31 5 8 7 3 .377 .438 .517 .955 14 35 1.65
Jeter L 212 189 16 51 11 0 3 13 17 29 4 6 4 5 .270 .344 .376 .720 -4 -11
Matsui W 222 195 43 68 15 0 11 50 23 25 1 3 2 1 .349 .428 .595 1.023 15 44 1.66
Matsui L 178 157 21 35 6 0 8 18 19 23 1 4 1 0 .223 .315 .414 .729 -2 -6
Posada W 217 181 38 58 16 1 7 39 30 36 3 10 2 0 .320 .433 .536 .969 12 36 1.12
Posada L 176 161 15 55 12 0 4 19 15 35 0 5 0 0 .342 .398 .491 .888 6 23
Rodriguez W 252 205 68 70 14 0 27 82 33 36 10 4 7 2 .341 .464 .805 1.269 33 85 1.74
Rodriguez L 209 177 29 46 11 0 8 20 27 45 3 7 4 0 .260 .373 .458 .831 5 14
W/L PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RB BB SO HB DP SB CS BA OBP SLG BR+/- Ratio
Total W 1874 1617 370 553 111 13 68 346 199 224 29 36 47 18 .342 .427 .553 .980 109 1.79
Total L 1494 1333 132 316 65 4 30 118 135 263 11 40 24 5 .237 .318 .359 .677 -35


BR+/-: Batting runs above average (not position-adjusted) using linear weights
per 650: BR+/- pro-rated to 650 plate appearances
Ratio: BR+/- per plate appearance in wins divided by BR+/- per plate appearance in losses. The higher the ratio, the bigger the disparity.
--Posted at 6:17 am by SG / 28 Comments | - (607)




Monday, July 9, 2007

Yankee Pitching at the All Star Break

I'm still mad about Saturday's game, but we must soldier on I guess. Anyway, the All Star Break is a good time to catch up on the team's performances to this point. I think I've been neglecting pitching this season because of how much "fun" it's been harping on the offense and defense, so today I'm going to look at the pitching staff so far. First, here are the Yankees pitchers sorted by most valuable to least valuable by runs saved above average. Read after the chart for explanations of all the columns.

Last RSAA G IP Hit HR BB K ERA RA FIP ERC ERA+
Wang 18 15 104.3 98 6 27 48 3.36 3.36 3.98 3.53 128
Bruney 8 39 35 28 2 25 27 2.57 2.57 4.69 3.70 168
Myers 7 41 31 27 3 12 13 2.61 2.61 5.04 3.57 165
Clemens 6 7 39.7 34 4 10 29 3.63 3.63 3.87 3.00 119
Rivera 3 32 34 33 3 5 32 3.71 3.71 3.15 3.09 116
Villone 3 14 19.3 14 1 6 9 3.26 3.26 3.78 2.28 132
Pettitte 2 20 112.3 127 8 34 62 4.25 4.73 4.00 4.40 102
Hughes 2 2 10.7 7 0 4 11 3.37 3.37 2.33 1.80 128
Britton 2 3 5 1 1 1 2 1.80 1.80 5.67 0.91 240
Proctor 1 45 47.7 40 4 24 34 3.59 4.34 4.38 3.52 120
Mussina 0 14 78 83 10 17 49 4.62 4.85 4.37 4.37 93
Ramirez 0 2 2.3 2 0 1 4 3.86 3.86 2.41 5.32 112
Rasner -1 6 24.7 29 4 8 11 4.01 5.11 5.70 5.12 108
Pavano -1 2 11.3 12 1 2 4 4.76 5.56 4.24 3.86 91
Henn -1 17 19.3 16 2 13 13 4.66 5.12 5.28 3.62 93
Farnsworth -1 37 34.3 38 3 16 23 4.46 4.98 4.46 4.20 97
Bean -2 3 3 5 0 5 2 12.00 12.00 6.93 8.16 36
Wright -3 2 8 10 5 6 6 7.88 7.88 12.14 9.85 55
Vizcaino -3 42 43 37 3 31 29 5.02 5.23 4.29 4.21 86
Desalvo -3 6 23 27 2 16 6 5.87 6.26 6.35 6.30 74
Clippard -4 6 27 29 6 17 18 6.33 6.33 6.60 5.81 68
Karstens -5 2 4.3 11 1 2 1 14.54 14.54 7.19 10.79 30
Igawa -13 9 46.7 52 11 23 33 7.14 7.33 6.59 5.84 60
Total 15 366.0 763.9 760 80 305 466 4.36 4.62 4.66 4.32 98


RSAA is runs saved above average, which I calculate by subracting the pitcher's runs allowed average from the league average runs allowed average, dividing by nine and then multiplying times innings pitched. Starters are compared to starters, relievers are compared to relievers, as relievers collectively have an RA of about .5 runs less than starters.

RA is just the equivalent of ERA, but includes unearned runs.

FIP is Tango Tiger's Fielding Independent Pitching, which is calculated using the formula 13 times HR plus 3 times BB + HBP - 2 times K divided by IP. 3.2 is added to that to give a # that should closely match ERA. The idea here is to regress a pitcher's batting average on balls in play to average by focusing on his peripherals. If you see a big difference between a pitcher's FIP and his ERA, you should expect them to move closer to each other if he continues to pitch the way he has to this point.

ERC is Component ERA. Kind of like FIP, it looks a player's components to see if their results match their actual performance. The one difference is it uses a pitcher's actual hit rate, so it does not penalize pitchers who do happen to have the ability to suppress hits on balls in play.

Last LD% GB% FB% BABIP HR+ BB+ K+ BF AB AVG OBP SLG
Wang 18.0% 58.7% 23.2% .277 181 133 69 418 383 .256 .311 .366
Bruney 17.5% 29.9% 52.9% .268 200 53 105 154 122 .230 .364 .328
Myers 15.7% 61.8% 22.1% .238 113 93 60 131 114 .237 .313 .368
Clemens 20.7% 50.0% 29.2% .261 103 135 110 158 147 .231 .278 .347
Rivera 16.3% 53.1% 30.6% .309 120 238 138 139 130 .254 .288 .346
Villone 16.4% 36.1% 47.7% .217 203 111 69 78 69 .203 .282 .261
Pettitte 18.4% 49.3% 32.3% .321 155 120 78 476 434 .293 .340 .417
Hughes 15.4% 57.7% 26.9% .269 inf 88 161 41 37 .189 .268 .216
Britton 14.3% 28.6% 57.1% .000 44 146 71 17 16 .063 .118 .250
Proctor 16.0% 28.5% 56.0% .252 134 74 99 207 174 .230 .319 .356
Mussina 20.6% 39.9% 39.5% .295 85 164 90 326 298 .279 .316 .446
Ramirez 0.0% 66.7% 25.0% .500 inf 86 240 10 7 .286 .400 .429
Rasner 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% .291 72 119 59 111 100 .290 .351 .470
Pavano 17.9% 46.2% 34.9% .282 119 197 52 46 44 .273 .304 .409
Henn 13.6% 42.4% 44.1% .237 114 58 89 88 73 .219 .341 .343
Farnsworth 19.0% 33.6% 48.0% .310 135 83 88 156 138 .275 .353 .384
Bean 8.3% 58.3% 33.3% .417 inf 33 63 19 14 .357 .526 .500
Wright 14.3% 25.0% 58.7% .217 21 57 90 40 34 .294 .400 .794
Vizcaino 20.8% 35.4% 43.4% .259 169 54 89 195 159 .233 .354 .384
Desalvo 17.6% 37.6% 44.6% .294 145 60 32 112 91 .297 .411 .495
Clippard 6.7% 39.3% 54.3% .277 54 62 87 124 107 .271 .371 .505
Karstens 35.0% 25.0% 41.7% .454 68 111 23 26 23 .478 .500 .696
Igawa 18.7% 31.0% 50.5% .283 51 80 92 215 189 .275 .363 .519
Total 17.9% 43.6% 38.5% .288 127 110 85 3287 2903 .269 .334 .417


LD%, GB%, and FB% are the percentage of balls in play that a pitcher allows that end up as line drives, ground balls, or fly balls, respectively.

BABIP is batting average on balls in play. This looks at all balls in a play that a pitcher gives up and what ratio they become hits. The formula used is (H - HR) / (AB - HR - SO + SF). The AL average this season is .300 on the nose. In theory, most pitchers should be close to that number, so most anyone who's above or below it has a probability of regressing towards it.

HR+, BB+, and K+ are my own numbers. These are similar to Baseball Reference's ERA+, in that they calculate a pitcher's HR allowed rate, walk allowed rate, and strikeout rate per batters faced as a ratio compared to league average. < 100 is below average, >100 is above average for all three. So if you look at Chien-Ming Wang, you see he prevents HRs at a rate 81% better than the average pitcher, walks 33% fewer, and strikes out 31% fewer. You have to love Chase Wright's 21 HR+.

BF is batters faced. AB is at bats by opposing hitters, and AVG, OBP, and SLG are what opposing hitters are hitting against the pitcher in question.

So what do all these numbers really mean?

First of all, Chien-Ming Wang rocks. He's been a win better than any Yankee pitcher despite missing a month. Yeah, he doesn't strike out a lot of people, but last year his K+ was 51, so he's improved significantly in that area this year. He's a master at keeping the ball in the park, and he pitches with good control. That has worked for Wang for 439 innings at the major league level now.

Brian Bruney's had a decent year as far as preventing runs, but his control is awful and he appears to have fallen out of favor in the bullpen pecking order. Bruney was released by Arizona for a reason, but he's still young enough to put it together. I wouldn't trust him over most of the rest of the pen right now though.

Mike Myers' has had what looks like a good year superficially, but he has failed at his job, which is to get out lefty hitters. Lefties are hitting .327/.410/.462, following up a line of .257/.297/.443 last year. Expect more of the same going forward. From what I can see, he's lost what little velocity he had and his slider is not as tough to hit as it used to be.

It's both a credit to Roger Clemens and an indictment of the rest of the team that he's been their fourth most valuable pitcher despite only starting six games. He's not throwing as hard as he used to, but he's succeeding. His K rate is still better than league average, and he's combining that with above average control and a good HR rate. He can probably pitch until he's 50.

Mariano Rivera's ERA is way out of line from what we are used to seeing, but he's been good recently. Over his last 24 games, he's pitched 27.1 innings and fanned 24 with a more Mo-like 1.65 ERA. He still doesn't look like MO to me, but he should be good going forward. His FIP and his component ERA both point to that as well. Interestingly, Rivera's already given up as many earned runs this year as he gave up in five full seasons in the past.

Everyone wants to dump Ron Villone, but he's been good at his role, pitching good baseball in low leverage spots. I don't see a pressing need to get rid of him. I'd probably lose Myers before Villone.

Andy Pettitte has been brutal his last few starts, but you could argue that it should have been seen coming. He had a 2.51 ERA after his first 11 starts, but 23 BB and just 38 strikeouts, and having allowed 70 hits in 71 innings. Since then, he's got a putrid 7.30 ERA. For the first half overall, he's been a hair above average, and he's eaten innings for the team and helped rest the pen for the majority of his starts. He's right around where he was projected to be overall, even though he took a circuitous rout to get there. Let's hope he's just in a rut and not hurting.

Phil Hughes pitched twice. We hope to see him back by the end of the month. He makes his first rehab start today I think.

Chris Britton has done nothing in the majors or Scranton to warrant still being in Scranton.

Scott Proctor's been up and down. It looks like he's made an adjustment recently, using his slow curve to freeze hitters looking for his fastball, and so far it's working. As a durable reliever who can give the team average or better innings, he's a useful piece.

Mike Mussina started out crappy. He still doesn't look great stuff wise, but he's been getting results. Over his last six starts he's got a 2.87 ERA, over his last eight it's 3.49. Take out his first start of the year and he's got an ERA of 4.14. I was hoping for a repeat of 2006, but it looks more that we will see the 2004-2005 version of Moose, who is useful if not great. Moose's FIP and ERC seem to agree that he'll be ok going forward, but not great.

Edwar Ramirez is the last of the Yankee pitchers who has not been below average. He should get a few chances to show if he can handle the majors yet. He's a great story so I'll be pulling for him.

I won't go through everyone else on the list, but I'll touch on a few of 'em.

Pavano. Heh.

I have nothing good to say about Kyle Farnsworth. I'd love to see the Yankees dump him somewhere, for anything they could get.

Luis Vizcaino has been the best part of the Randy Johnson trade, which tells you how well that whole thing worked out. In his defense, he's pitched better of late although he's still got mediocre peripherals. Did you know Vizcaino already has 11 IBB this year? That really skews his numbers.

Kei Igawa. I expected a 5.00 ERA with hopes of a 4.00, and instead I've gotten a 7.14 ERA with hopes that he doesn't pitch any more. Igawa's K rate is passable, but his control has been poor, and his HR rate is off the charts bad. The league is hitting .275/.363/.519 against him. Eeesh.

Overall, the Yankee pitching staff has actually been a touch above average (15 RSAA overall). That's because even with a slightly below average ERA, they have allowed fewer unearned runs than average so fewer overall. Their team RA is 4.66 compared to the AL average of 4.80. That's the fairly good news. The bad news is that as a team they have the worst K rate in the league, with a K+ of 85.

I'll look at either the offense or defense tomorrow.

Update: A couple of links some of you may have interest in. Over at the Hardball Times, Chris Jaffe looks at a simulation of the 28 worst teams of all time. I helped Chris run these. No, the 2007 Yankees are not on the list, yet.

Also, Top Prospect Alert has posted their Top 100 prospects at midseason. Hughes is still considered a prospect, and they have him as #2 behind Justin Upton. Six Yankees make the grade, although one name is a bit surprising.

--Posted at 8:34 am by SG / 27 Comments | - (1111)




Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Newsday: Damon an option at first

BOSTON—Johnny Damon brought his first baseman’s glove to Fenway Park yesterday. He might get to use it in a game sometime soon.

Yankees centerfielder Damon was in the lineup as the DH last night, but he worked out at first base before the game for the second straight day.

With Doug Mientkiewicz out for six to eight weeks after his scary collision with Mike Lowell on Saturday, Josh Phelps will get a turn as the everyday first baseman for a while, according to manager Joe Torre. But the day is coming when Damon will make a mid-career position change, from everyday centerfielder to everyday utilityman.

“Even before Mientkiewicz [got hurt], he was taking ground balls,” Torre said. “I talked about it with him. I talked about not only taking balls at first base but taking fly balls in left and rightfield. He says, ‘Fine,’ and that’s what he’s been doing. This could be an option, probably even more so now.”

The article’s a couple of days old, but after Josh Phelps’s struggles yesterday we’ll probably hear more about this. 

Damon as a first baseman would project to be about eight runs worse than average over a full season.  However, he’d be replacing the current Yankee 1B, and not an average one.  Phelps may or may not be able to hit decently, but as we’ve all seen, he’s a butcher defensively.  If you make Phelps the full-time DH and Damon can play first at an average pace, it probably saves the Yankees some runs.

Ideally, if Damon was healthy, he could be shifted to LF.  Melky appears to have come into his own defensively, and has been hitting well recently (.304/.375/.522 since May 2).  Damon has not played LF since 2001, but he owns a career ZR of .907 in left, equal to around a +11 per 150 rating.  Even if we assume an average defensive decline of 1.5 runs per season from 2001, that still puts him as solidly average, minus his throwing arm.  That’s probably a ten run upgrade over Hideki Matsui going forward.  I don’t know if Matsui could play first, or if the hit of Phelps as a full-time 1B instead of Damon nullifies that advantage, but it may be something that needs to be looked at.

A few people asked about the Jermaine Dye for Bobby Abreu rumors, and what it would mean, so here’s what it looks like. 

Coming into the season, Abreu projected to be worth 19 batting runs above an average RF over 650 plate appearances.  Dye projected to be worth 22 above average (both numbers after park adjustments).  So there’s a slight offensive edge for Dye.  Defensively, here are their runs saved per 162 games in RF over the last six years by zone rating.

Abreu
2002: +12
2003: +6
2004: +1
2005: -5
2006: -6
2007: -3
Wt. Avg: -2

Dye
2002: -8
2003: -3
2004: +9
2005: +6
2006: -3
2007: -22
Wt. Avg: 0

Another slight edge to Dye according to these numbers.  I haven’t seen Dye play enough to know about his defense, but I know that Abreu’s projection likely overstates his current true talent.  I’d have to assume Dye would be a defensive upgrade.  Their throwing arms are probably close in value.

Basically, if they play to their projections from here on out, they’ll be within a couple of runs of each other one way or the other.  Dye makes about half of what Abreu makes, so if a swap could be made without taking on salary it makes sense.  Other than that, it’s not really a difference-making exchange, although it would be a safer risk to offer Dye arbitration at the end of the season for free agent compensation due to his lower salary, probably something that should be kept in mind.

I didn’t see last night’s game, so I can’t really get into it much.  It was good to see Chris Britton making a case for a role in the pen.  Why he hasn’t overtake Luis Vizcaino is a real head-scratcher.  It’s called a sunk cost Cashman.  Just because Vizcaino is being paid $4 million or whatever, you don’t have to keep running him out there.

Matt DeSalvo stunk again, although his defense didn’t help him out.  I don’t think you can keep him in the rotation at this point, it’s killing the bullpen.  At some point they should probably just go back to Kei Igawa, who at least showed the ability to last five innings more often than not.

This team just can’t get on a roll.  I can’t imagine being forced to play a night game on Sunday and then travelling to Chicago overnight and playing in the rain helped, but them’s the breaks.

Update: I just saw that Clete Boyer passed away.  Boyer retired before I was born, but he was part of the 1961 Yankee team I loved whipping my brother with in Microleague Baseball.  RIP Mr. Boyer.

--Posted at 7:08 am by SG / 31 Comments | No Trackbacks - (975)




Sunday, June 3, 2007

Sunday Links - June 3

Sunday News Links

It looks like any chance of Roger Clemens saving the Yankees’ season (which is a ridiculous notion) are on hold for at least two weeks, as Clemens has a fatigued groin.  It’s expected that the “new and improved” Kei Igawa will get the start in his stead on Monday.  The rebuilt Igawa has pitched 14 innings in the minors, and allowed 15 hits, 1 HR, with 4 BB and 12 K, and an ERA of 3.86.  I don’t think this will go well.

Doug Mientkiewicz was involved in a nasty collision at first base yesterday, and will be placed on the 15 day DL.  The list of injuries is pretty long, a concussion, a cervical sprain (aka whiplash), and a fractured wrist.  That last one is the scariest, because you never know how a hitter’s wrist is going to heal.

No word on who will be called up to replace him, although a 40 man roster move will probably have to be made if one of Andy Phillips or Shelley Duncan is the choice.

According to the Daily News, Hal Steinbrenner is the new managing general partner of the Yankees.  Your guess is as good as mine as to what that means.

I did not see yesterday’s game, and I’m pretty happy that I didn’t.  I’m just wondering why no one in the media is killing Derek Jeter for making two errors in the seventh inning that ended up costing the Yankees the game?  Can you imagine if that had been Alex Rodriguez?  Add in Jeter’s two double plays, and Jeter was as responsible for that loss as anyone else on the team yesterday, go-ahead HR aside. 

And can someone explain why Scott Proctor was pitching yesterday, after having pitched on three of the past four days, and with all the drama that occurred in Friday night’s game? 

--Posted at 8:26 am by SG / 26 Comments | No Trackbacks - (990)




Sunday, April 15, 2007

Gut Punch

With two outs in the ninth inning of today’s game in Oakland, the Yankees were holding a 4-2 lead.  There were one out away from going 4-2 on their first road trip of the season, and taking two of three from both Minnesota and Oakland on the road.  The pitching staff had a 2.02 ERA on the trip to this point.  The much-maligned starting staff had an ERA of 1.38, and the much-used bullpen had an ERA of 2.84.  Unfortunately, Mariano Rivera did what doesn’t do all that much, and blew the save, and the Yanks fell 5-4.  It was a painful loss, so close to victory with Mo on the mound.  As I watched Marco Scutaro’s ball praying it would curve foul, I felt like I got punched in the gut.

It’s amazing how one pitch can change our perception of a week’s worth of games, but that’s exactly what happened.  Instead of a successful 4-2 road trip and a 6-5 start to the season, the Yankees limp home with a 3-3 road trip, a 5-6 record,  and down two starters with Carl Pavano and Mike Mussina getting DL’ed..  You can pin this loss on Mo.  It happens a few times every year, and it is always a surprise, and it’s always painful.  Why did you walk Kendall Mo?  Why?

The road trip itself had good and bad.  I thought the pitching staff was very good, and they finished the trip with a 2.48 ERA.  Granted, the teams they faced have not been offensive powerhouses to this point, but they’re still major league teams with good players.  The pitching staff, especially the rotation, is probably the biggest concern with the Yankees right now, so it was good to see credible outings from Andy Pettitte, Kei Igawa, and Darrell Rasner.  Pavano would’ve been lumped in there too if he didn’t get injured.

The real issue on the road trip was the position players, on offense and defense.  The team hit a collective .260/.331/.381.  They played good defense in Minnesota, but looked awful against Oakland, giving up five unearned runs.  Better defense, and they probably sweep Oakland.  We know the team is limited as far as their range, so it’s doubly frustrating when they fail to make plays they get to, and it’s inexcusable.

So now the Yankees are 5-6, largely because their main strength(offense) is still not showing itself.  The oft-touted minor league pitching depth that Brian Cashman has been accumulating will start being pressed into action, with Chase Wright the next to get the call on Tuesday, weather permitting.  If Cashman’s stated goal of making the team younger and more flexible is true, then this is an opportunity for people like Wright. 

I’m not even close to worried.  There are 151 games to go, and Chien-Ming Wang is due back soon.  Wang and Pettitte should be solid starters.  I’d trust that a healthy Moose will be at least league average, and probably better than that.  Kei Igawa showed signs of being useful in his last start, and there’s still Jeff Karstens and the entire rotation of Scranton-WB to fill in if needed.  From there, if the Yankees need Roger Clemens, they’re probably in the position to go get him, with Houston looking bad and with Boston not needing him.

In other words, there’s no reason to worry yet.  We can’t have the 1998 Yankees every year, and that would get boring anyway. 

--Posted at 7:15 pm by SG / 19 Comments | No Trackbacks - (749)




Saturday, April 14, 2007

Derek Jeter Zone Rating Update - April 14

Since I last posted about Derek Jeter's awful ZR and pace, he's been playing much better, so it's only fair to recognize that now. Here is a day by day log of Jeter's defense, logging playable chances as defined by zone rating and the actual plays made.
Player Date G GS INN PO A E DP PM Ch ZR
Jeter 2-Apr 1 1 9 2 3 1 2 3 5 0.600
Jeter 5-Apr 1 1 9 3 2 2 1 2 6 0.455
Jeter 6-Apr 1 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.455
Jeter 7-Apr 1 1 9 0 2 0 0 2 2 0.538
Jeter 8-Apr 1 1 9 1 2 0 0 2 2 0.600
Jeter 9-Apr 1 1 9 5 4 0 2 5 5 0.700
Jeter 10-Apr 1 1 9 1 5 0 1 4 4 0.750
Jeter 11-Apr 1 1 8 3 3 0 2 1 1 0.760
Jeter 13-Apr 1 1 10.1 1 4 0 0 5 6 0.774
Jeter Total 9 9 80.1 16 25 3 8 24 31 0.774

His ZR has gone from .455 to .774 over the last six games, and his RS/162 pace has gone from -212 to -25. Really though, this post is not about Jeter's defense. The sample size is too small for it to be particularly meaningful. It's more to make a larger point, that looking at a 4-5 record after 9 games and being ready to panic is pretty short-sighted. Yesterday's loss sucked, and should have been a win, but at least we saw signs that Kei Igawa may end up being a serviceable back of the rotation starter. In the big picture, that is more important than one loss.

Kyle Farnsworth should be demoted to garbage time BTW.

I'm also stunned that Carl Pavano has an arm issue. Stunned.
--Posted at 12:32 pm by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (236)




Tuesday, April 10, 2007

2007 Yankee Run Values - Through April 9

I figure it's a good time for a small sample-size look at how the Yankees have performed so far. Here's the position players on offense and defense. The last 3 columns are if you pro-rate over the rest of the season.
Player BR Def Total pBR pDef pTotal
A Rodriguez* 6.7 -0.3 6.3 180 -9 171
J Damon* 2.5 0.7 3.2 68 18 86
B Abreu* 1.8 1.2 2.9 48 32 79
J Posada* 1.6 0.2 1.8 43 4 48
J Phelps* -0.1 0.7 0.5 -4 18 15
W Nieves* -0.4 0.0 -0.4 -12 0 -12
M Cairo* -0.9 0.3 -0.6 -23 8 -15
J Giambi* -0.8 0.0 -0.8 -23 0 -23
D Mientkiewicz* -1.0 -0.3 -1.3 -26 -8 -34
H Matsui* -0.4 -0.9 -1.4 -11 -26 -37
M Cabrera* -3.0 1.4 -1.7 -82 37 -45
D Jeter* 0.2 -1.9 -1.7 6 -52 -46
R Cano* -0.8 -1.8 -2.6 -22 -48 -71
Total 5.2 -1.0 4.3 142 -26 115


Alex Rodriguez is on fire. Damon's not getting the hype, but he's doing really well too. The middle infield is sucking it up so far on both sides of the ball, but I don't expect that to continue for long. And what about the pitching?

Player RSAA pRSAA
S Henn* 2.2 59
M Myers* 1.9 51
B Bruney* 1.7 46
K Farnsworth* 1.4 38
M Rivera* 0.9 25
L Vizcaino* 0.6 15
A Pettitte* 0.3 9
S Proctor* -0.3 -8
C Pavano* -0.7 -18
D Rasner* -3.0 -80
M Mussina* -4.1 -111
K Igawa* -4.7 -126
Total -3.7 -100


BR Batting Runs above average (linear weights)
Def Runs saved above average by Zone Rating
Total BR + Def
RSAA Runs saved above average (lgERA - ERA)/9 x IP

The bullpen is carrying the pitching staff so far, which isn't exactly news to anyone who's been watching. They won't be able to keep up their performance, because if they're pitching as much as they have to this point they're going to get worn out, but you have to figure Moose will get better, and Igawa will either get better or be pitching in Scranton. Wang should return by the end of the month. As I mentioned at the top, small sample size clearly applies, but this should give you a rough idea of where the Yankees should get better. The fact that they've been scoring like they have with minimal to negative contribution from the bulk of their players is a very good sign. If they get their starting pitching to be serviceable, they'll be in pretty good shape.
--Posted at 7:58 am by SG / 13 Comments | No Trackbacks - (683)




Sunday, April 8, 2007

InstaWin!

One of the things I like about doing a liveblog is how it captures how I feel at a particular moment in the game.  If I write a recap, it’s inevitably colored by my feelings about the ultimate outcome of the game.  A bad play early doesn’t seem so bad if they win, and a great play early seems futile if they lose.  But in that liveblog, each event is described with the feelings I had at that time.  If you go back and read yesterday’s liveblog, you’ll see the utter feeling of resignation I felt.

It was dreadful.  Kei Igawa somehow pitched five innings, but he’d given up the game in the second, when the Orioles jumped to a 5-2 lead.  Two innings later it was 7-2, and the game just felt over.  It wasn’t just because they were down by 5—they’ve got a good enough offense to come back from that—it’s that they were going down so very meekly.  They weren’t making Trachsel work, they weren’t generating rallies that were falling short, they were just making outs.

Every time they make this kind of comeback, I tell myself that I’ll never doubt again, but really, you can’t keep that kind of promise.  It happens, but not often enough to expect it.  Early on, it was plausible, but they weren’t putting up much of a fight.  As the game got later, though the bullpen shut the O’s down again, a comeback became even less and less likely.  The turning point, when a comeback seemed plausible for the first time, was when A-Rod came back from 0-2 to walk in the eighth inning to put the tying run on deck.  And with Jason Giambi’s three-run homer, a tie was just one swing away.

But still, even then, my mind fixed not on how they could have win, but on the things they did to lose.  If only Jeter hadn’t dropped the ball at second base, if only he’d gotten on base in front of A-Rod’s 1st inning homer, or Abreu’s eighth inning walk.  If only Cano had been able to get a hit, or if that pop fly that fell behind first had gone just a little further.  If only that pitch to Markakis in the first was just a little further outside…

The Yanks went down meekly to Chris Ray in the ninth on Friday, and they were well on their way to doing that again yesterday.  Doug Mientkiewicz ripped a ball to start the inning, but a diving grab by Chris Gomez turned a double into an out.  And you had to figure that if they weren’t going to get that break, they had no chance.  Then Melky got blown away, and Cano fell behind 0-1.  But then Cano got a hit, and Jeter was up with a chance to tie or win it.

My thoughts went to Jeter’s earlier failures, and how even if he grounded out to end the game, he’d be given a pass in the media for the loss, while A-Rod gets crucified for doing anything wrong in a game where everyone failed.  And Jeter came very close to blowing it, swinging at a pitch that nearly hit him, turning either a 3-1 count (or maybe a HBP) into a 2-2 count.  But Jeter was able to work the walk, and the game continued.

Before Jeter’s AB, I joked that maybe the O’s should walk the bases loaded so they could strike out A-Rod.  I wasn’t really serious, but I knew that if they did get to A-Rod, and he did strike out, that A-Rod would be the goat… despite having carried the team the whole game.  And when Abreu was hit with the second pitch… up came A-Rod with the bases loaded and two outs, do-or-die.

Maybe he’d hit a single to win, or draw a walk to tie.  He could hit a deep fly out, or a weak grounder.  He could pop up, line out, strike out looking, or strike out swinging.  Or he could hit a homer.  There were so many things he could do to lose the game, so few things he could do to tie or win it.  Just the mere fact that he makes outs 60% of the time made it more likely he’d fail here than succeed.  But I also knew that this was the golden opportunity.

A-Rod’s reputation is unfair for so many reasons.  If he makes a first inning out with RISP, people remember that.  If he drives the runner home, people cheer, then forget about it.  And it’s just the first inning, so what does it matter?  Unless, of course, he made an out.  Which he’s more likely than not to do anyway.

The reputation really snowballed since he first came to New York.  He “struggled” in his first season, never hitting like the MVP he was in Texas.  That disappointed fans, and there were the inevitable questions about whether he was “cut out” for New York.  Then he singlehandedly carried them to victory in the ALDS, and was poised to be the ALCS MVP.  Then Bill Mueller singled, and all was lost.  The slap play in Game Six became the lasting image of the series for the Yankees, and A-Rod was blamed far more than his fair share for the loss.  Jeter, Sheffield and Matsui deserved far more of the blame.

Then came 2005, where he was obviously the MVP the moment the Yankees got back into the playoff hunt.  He was hitting as well as he’d ever had, but in August, there started a movement to give David Ortiz the MVP.  Ortiz’s numbers weren’t as good as A-Rod’s, and he played DH while A-Rod played a strong 3B.  So Ortiz’s clutch numbers, which were spectacular, were introduced.  Ortiz hit better in the clutch.  A-Rod hit worse.  A-Rod’s numbers were still pretty good in those situations, but in order to make Ortiz seem like the better candidate, his supporters started to preach that A) Clutch Hitting was basically the only thing that mattered, and B) A-Rod wasn’t just worse than normal in the clutch, he outright STUNK in the clutch.

It didn’t work, A-Rod hung on to his MVP, though the vote shouldn’t have been nearly as close.  Then came a 2-15 ALDS against the Angels, including some crucial failures in big spots, and the reputation grew.  The 2004 ALDS was forgotten, the blame for the ALCS in 2004 was placed even more on him, and he was blamed almost entirely for the 2005 ALDS loss, while Gary Sheffield and Hideki Matsui got off blameless.

And the reputation stuck, and when A-Rod struggled through the month of June in 2006, and failed in several clutch spots, critics jumped on him.  “Ah-ha!  We told you he stunk in the clutch!  See?  He can’t do it!  He never could!”  A come-from-behind walkoff against the Braves was discounted because it was off a crap pitcher and a mediocre team in interleague play.  And then came a 1-14 ALDS against the Tigers, a loss that he was against blamed for (while—guess who?—Gary Sheffield wasn’t criticized for).  And so it goes.

And now he was up in the bottom of the ninth.  Without him, the game would be 7-3, or maybe worse.  It would stink if he made an out here, but you couldn’t blame him for the loss, not with all he’d already done.

But they were going to blame him.  You KNOW they were going to blame him.  If he walked, they’d ignore it, if he singled, they’d cheer it, then forget it.  There was only one thing he could do to make them remember, at least for a little while.

The first pitch was outside, and the second was over the outside corner for strike one.  The third was over the plate, and A-Rod swung through it.

Oh no.  1-2… a strike looking at the knees.  Or maybe a swinging strike on a ball off the plate, or worst of all, swinging through a high pitch he could drive.  It happens all the time, but if he did that here, they’d remember it… for a long time.  I didn’t expect a strikeout… but I dreaded the fallout of one.  As though a strikeout was worse than a fly ball to the warning track.  But to the media, it is.  Because it just seems so much more inept.

The 1-2… a swing… contact!  Good contact!  Is Patterson going to be able to get that one?  It looks like it’s going to get over him, he’s pulling up…. IT’S GONE!  IT’S GONE!!!

A-Rod knew it the moment he swung the bat, he knew he’d won the game, he knew he’d hit a grand slam.  And maybe they’d boo him Sunday if he hit into a first inning double play, but this was a game that mattered to this team at this point, off a pitcher who isn’t just good, but very good.

If the Yankees had lost, they’d be 1-3, in last place.  They’d have had terrible pitching for every game, their bullpen would be spent, and it would be panic time in the tabloids.  The pitching has still stunk, the bullpen is still beat, but they’re now 2-2, and things are looking okay enough to avoid any kind of panic in the media.  This team didn’t need extra pressure, and A-Rod’s blast took it off of them for a couple of days, and off of him for a couple of weeks, at least.  There are, and always will be, a number of clutch failures that people will point to with A-Rod.  There have been plenty for Jeter and Ortiz, too, but people never point to them.  This is one that his defenders can point to.  No, he’s not as clutch as Papi, but nobody is.  A-Rod can get it done when the game’s on the line, and he gets it done when the game’s being contended, too.  There are actually people out there who think the Yankees would be somehow better off without A-Rod, that they should let him walk this offseason and get someone else—anybody else—to take over at third.  That he’s just so inept when they need him he’s worthless.  We call these people idiots, but they’re also loud people.  This will shut them up for a day or two.  On this point, at least.

So the Yankees head into the series finale 2-2.  You know, they’ve been terrible on defense and with starting pitching, but they’re still outscoring their opponents 29-25.  If you extrapolate that ratio to 162 games, they’d score nearly 1200 runs while giving up more than 1000.  But they’d win 93 games.

And really, you’ve gotta expect things to get better.  Worst case scenario, they’re not going to have a starting rotation ERA of 9.87.

John Mileskey (SJ) will be liveblogging today’s game, so join us this afternoon for some Grade A snark.  Happy baseball!

(One last note: it’s been mentioned that the liveblogs are replacing our “usual” analysis.  Not really.  The liveblogs are replacing our usual non-posts.  For me, they’re like a writing exercise, and hopefully they’ll get my gears clicking enough to get me back into a groove.  I’m about to turn 30, and I’ve wasted my life.  If there’s a way for me to accomplish anything in life, it’s with my words.  So I’ve got to find a way to make it work.  And hopefully the liveblogs will help.

Plus, the Game Chatters are just pure fun!)

--Posted at 2:43 am by Larry Mahnken / 6 Comments | No Trackbacks - (374)




Thursday, April 5, 2007

North Jersey: Yankees Notebook April 5

Veteran left-hander Ron Villone has signed a minor league contract with the Yankees and will report to their Class AAA Scranton affiliate, general manager Brian Cashman said Wednesday.

This isn’t a bad thing, I don’t think.  Villone will be insurance against injuries or struggles by Sean Henn or Brian Bruney.

With Wednesday’s rainout moving the rotation back, lefty Kei Igawa will make his Yankee debut Saturday afternoon against the Orioles. Darrell Rasner still gets the Sunday start against Baltimore, while Carl Pavano opens the road schedule Monday in Minnesota. Pavano originally was to make his second start Saturday.

Manager Joe Torre said pitching coach Ron Guidry finally made contact with Chien-Ming Wang in Florida, and the right-hander said his rehab from a right hamstring strain was right on schedule. Wang is on the 15-day disabled list.

While Torre said Wang may pitch in a simulated game this weekend, Cashman said the Yankees will not offer detailed information about their rehab players (including Wang and Jeff Karstens) because it could affect trade talks down the road.

The Cashman regime is like The Kremlin.

It’s cold in the Bronx, but it looks like the rain will stay away, so they should get tonight’s game in.  It’ll be Moose Andy Pettitte vs. James Shields Jae Seo.

Credit to nomaas.org

--Posted at 8:27 am by SG / 7 Comments | No Trackbacks - (355)




Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Looking Ahead to 2007: Andy Pettitte & Kei Igawa

With the regular season approaching faster than I realized, it’s time to start doubling up my preview posts.  So I’ll take a look at Andy Pettitte and Kei Igawa together.

Yankee fans already know a lot about Pettitte, as one of the faces of the Yankee run from 1996-2001.  I always considered Pettitte to be a little overrated, but he’s a good pitcher, whose peripherals improved after 2000.

In the chart above, HR+ is league HR / league batters faced divided by HR/Batters Faced.  It’s a way to compare a pitcher’s HR rate to the league, where a number higher than 100 is better than average, less than 100 is worse than average.  BB+ is calculated the same way for BB, and K+ is calculated by dividing the pitcher’s K rate by the league K rate, so it scales the same way. 

Pettitte’s K+ spiked after 2000, and has remained above league average since.  He’s always been fairly good at controlling HRs until 2006, and his control has been pretty good for most of his career.Pettitte picked up some velocity when the Yankees got Roger Clemens, which was credited to him working out with his idol.  That led to improvement across the board.  I actually felt Pettitte went from being overrated to underrated from 2001-2003. However, when his contract was up at the end of 2003, Pettitte left as a free agent.  Whether it was the Yankees not giving him the ‘respect’ he felt he deserved or the rumors of family-related reasons, the Yankees watched Pettitte go to Houston, where he pitched pretty well for the most part, with an injury-shortened first season and a lousy first half in 2006 marring his record.

04/04/2006 - 6/28/2006
IP: 108
H: 136
R: 74
ER: 67
HR: 18
BB: 38
K: 81
ERA: 5.58

07/04/2006 - 9/30/2006
IP: 106.3
H: 102
R: 40
ER: 33
HR: 9
BB: 32
K: 97
ERA: 2.79

I have no idea why Pettitte was so bad in the first half, but the second half numbers are a good sign that he’s got something left in the tank.

When Pettitte left, the Yankees got a compensation first round draft pick from the Astros.  They used that pick to take Phil Hughes.

I’ve seen a little of Pettitte in spring training, and he’s looked pretty good.  He’s not throwing as hard as he did during his peak, but he’s a different pitcher now, using a curve and changeup more frequently.  Pettitte won’t be asked to repeat his 1997 greatness, but he should be above average this year. 

The other lefty in the Yankee rotation is Kei Igawa, the consolation prize when the Yankees failed to land the more coveted Daisuke Matsuzaka.  Fairly or not, he’ll be compared to Matsuzaka all year, but let’s ignore that and just look at what he brings to the table on his own merits. 

I took a look at Igawa a few months ago, so I won’t rehash the scouting report stuff here.  Now that I’ve seen Igawa pitch a couple of times, I’m more comfortable with his signing than I was at the time.  He has good stuff for a lefty.  His fastball sits at 89-90, and I’ve seen him hit 92 once in a while.  His breaking ball isn’t as sharp as I’d like to see, but it’s passable.  His changeup is pretty good, probably his best pitch.  He has struck out 19 in 17 spring innings.  He’s also kept the ball in the park, allowing just one HR.  Unfortunately, he’s also walked 12 in those 17 innings.  Even ignoring the walk total, his command has been pretty shaky, as he seems to miss the catcher’s target a lot.  If that’s just nerves or getting used to the difference between the MLB ball and the Japanese League ball, it will hopefully get worked out.

The HR has been the biggest issue with Japanese League pitchers coming over to the majors. Here are my latest Japanese League to MLB translations.  I refined these from the previous Igawa post by matching the innings totals for both samples so that the numbers wouldn’t be skewed.

H: 1.10
R: 1.14
ER: 1.16
HR: 1.84
BB: 0.78
SO: 0.87

What these numbers mean is that a pitcher from the Japanese leagues coming over to the majors will give up hits at a 10% higher rate, runs at a 14% higher rate, etc.  Their walk rate
actually decreases in the majors, as does their strikeout rate.  The number that really stands out is the spike in HR rate.

In 2004, Igawa gave up 29 HRs in 200 IP.  In 2005, he gave up 23 in 172 IP.  In 2006 he gave up 17 HRs in 209 IP.  Controlling the HR will be the key in Igawa being successful.  He supposedly changed his approach last year, knowing that his old style wouldn’t work in MLB.  If you translate just his 2006 using the numbers above, you get an ERA in the mid 3s, which would be great.  However, we can’t ignore 2004 and 2005 when projecting him.So, speaking of projecting Igawa (and Pettitte), here you go…

Full spreadsheets available at this link

I’d take a combined 380 innings of above average pitching.  If you slot Pettitte and Igawa to replace Randy Johnson and Jaret Wright, you go from 340 innings of -10 RSAA(runs saved above average) to 380 innings with an RSAA of 8.  So an 18 run or so upgrade, roughly two wins.

--Posted at 6:29 pm by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (165)




Friday, March 16, 2007

Yankees.com - Notes: Igawa still making adjustments

Eight of Kei Igawa’s first nine pitches missed the strike zone Thursday, and with two Atlanta Braves on base and none out, Ron Guidry made an unexpectedly early trot to the mound.

Communication has been just one hurdle for the Japanese left-hander this spring, but whatever Guidry said in his Louisiana twang, it seemed to help.

Igawa struck out the side to end the inning and, even as he battled spotty control, finished off three scoreless frames to complete his third Grapefruit League start.

I got to watch Igawa for the first time last night.  His fastball was better than I expected, pretty consistent at 90-91, but his command was horrible.  Even on his strikes, he was missing Jorge Posada’s target on pretty much every pitch.  Like Philco said in the comments of the last post, the strikeouts are a good sign that his stuff can get big league hitters out, but if he doesn’t get his command that’s not going to fly. 

With the Yankees not needing a fifth starter for at least a few weeks, I think the Yankees should probably start Igawa in AAA.  Putting him in the major league bullpen as the long reliever won’t give him the work he needs to get his mechanics in order. I’m still not expecting great things from Igawa, but from what little I saw last night he’s got the potential to be a decent fourth or fifth starter.

--Posted at 8:31 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (123)




Thursday, February 8, 2007

Hartford Courant: Igawa Off To Early Start

Kei Igawa has already started his first spring training with the Yankees.
Igawa, who agreed to a five-year, $20 million contract in December, has been throwing on flat ground at the Yankees’ minor league complex in Tampa, Fla.

“He looks like he is going to be a real good pitcher,” Yankees vice president Billy Connors said Wednesday after Igawa’s second workout. “He throws a heavy ball. He should be very good.”



Spring training is coming…


--Posted at 7:46 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (125)




Monday, December 18, 2006

NY Times: Yanks May Deal Cabrera; Igawa Contract Is Close

  The Yankees are in discussions with the Atlanta Braves and the Pittsburgh Pirates about a three-way deal that would send outfielder Melky Cabrera to the Braves from the Yankees, reliever Mike Gonzalez to the Yankees from the Pirates, and first baseman Adam LaRoche to the Pirates from the Braves, according to a baseball official.

  The official, who was granted anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss trade possibilities publicly, also said that the Yankees were close to completing a five-year, $20 million deal with the Japanese pitcher Kei Igawa. The deal is likely to be completed tomorrow and is pending a physical

A possible Cabrera/Laroche/Gonzalez trade was a hot topic over the weekend, but seems to have cooled down quite a bit. While I’d hate to see Melky go, Gonzalez is a potentially great setup man, especially if he can recover his control to go with his mid 90s fastball.

If the Igawa deal is correct, the Yankees will have paid $46 million for 5 years. I guess he can’t be worse than Carl Pavano, right?

Update: Regarding Melky and what his potential is, I noticed that his Baseball Reference Page did not have his list of similar players. However, I used their methodology to figure them out, and here’s a list.

Gregg Jefferies 1989 (868)
Luis Rivas 2001 (861)
Adrian Beltre 2000 (844)
Wil Cordero (829)
Alan Trammel 1979 (823)
Harold Baines 1980 (821)
Mike Caruso 1998 (818)
Gary Sheffield 1990 (818)
Ivan Rodriguez 1993 (811)
Ozzie Guillen 1985 (804)

I guess he could end up being really good, or really bad.

Update 2: Igawa, Yanks reach 5-year deal.

  The New York Yankees and Kei Igawa both played second fiddle in the posting sweepstakes. Igawa, though, got a first-rate deal it was learned on Monday, agreeing to a five-year, 20 million dollars contract with the Bronx Bombers.

  The Yanks earned the right to negotiate with Igawa in late November and wasted little time getting the southpaw in pinstripes.

  The deal for the 27-year-old, who was 14-9 this past season with a 2.97 ERA for the Hanshin Tigers, also includes incentives.

  Negotiations were smooth thanks Igawa’s agent, Arn Tellem, who has strong ties with the Yankees. Talks opened on Nov. 29 and Tellem made it clear that Igawa wanted a long-term deal.

  The Yanks, who earned negotiating rights with a bid of a little more than 26 million dollars, thought highly of the Hanshin ace and both sides were determined to hammer out a deal before the 30-day negotiating deadline.

--Posted at 8:29 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (194)




Monday, December 4, 2006

12/4/06: Odds and Ends

With baseball’s Winter Meetings beginning to roll, there’s no shortage of rumors and speculation rampant.

According to Newsday, the Yankees are holding a roster spot open for Andy Pettitte should he decide to come back to the Bronx, even though it’s not very likely. Pettitte wouldn’t be a bad option, as he’d likely come with a shorter time committment than someone like Barry Zito. He was overrated during his Yankee tenure, but he’s a solid pitcher, and could probably put up an ERA in the 4.00 area while giving the team innings as long as he can stay healthy, something that is occasionally a problem for him.

In good news for Yankee fans, Tanyon Sturtze has signed with Atlanta. For some reason, the Braves are guaranteeing him $750,000. I guess a bellyful of guts is a valued commodity. There are rumors that the Yankees may look to deal Kyle Farnsworth. I don’t think it’d hurt the Yankees to see what he could bring back, although I don’t necessarily think he has to be dealt or anything. He had his good stretches and bad stretches last season, just like he has throughout his entire career. He’s a decent bet to be useful next year, although his 2005 is pretty apparently the outlier in an inconsistent career.

A reader emailed me this page of Kei Igawa’s 2006 splits from Yahoo! Japan. Since I can’t read Japanese real well, I ran it through the World Lingo translator. Igawa had a Defense Ratio (ERA) of 2.97 last season. He had 3 Nothing Point Victories (shutouts). He suffered 180 Hits, 17 book Base Hits (HRs), got Three Swings (Strikeouts) 194 times, he gave 49 Annie Oakleys (BB, WTF?), and also gave six dead spheres (HBP). He allowed 77 losing points (Runs) and 69 Self-reproach points (Earned Runs).

Fun with translations aside, the lefty/righty splits were interesting.

Vs. Righties
AB: 518
H: 106
HR: 7
K: 138
BB: 33
HBP: 4
AVg: .205
OBP: .258
K/PA: .25
BB/PA: .06

Vs. Lefties
AB: 251
H: 74
HR: 10
K: 56
BB: 16
HBP: 2
Avg. .295
OBP: .342
K/PA: .21
BB/PA: .06

One year’s splits can have a lot of noise, and it’s also probable he was facing only the better lefties in Japan, but these aren’t very good splits for a team that will be facing David Ortiz 19 times this season. This also tells me he’s probably primarily a changeup pitcher, and his breaking ball is not very good.

The Yankees are still in the market for a 1B, backup C, and a utility IF. They may bring Miguel Cairo back, who isn’t great by any means but isn’t as bad as his offensive numbers make him seem thanks to his ability to play multiple positions quite well defensively. I still think Mike Lieberthal as a backup C makes all kinds of sense. As far as 1B, I still think Craig Wilson would be the best option, because he can help balance what’s become a very heavily left-handed lineup. And yeah, I know he had 105 bad AB as a Yankee. Putting stock in that over the 1848 other AB he’s had in his career is not really good player evaluation.

I pray the rumors about the Yankees interest in Shea Hillenbrand aren’t valid, because I don’t think I can stand rooting for him, and he’s just not that good. I’ve seen mention of Doug Mientkiewicz. I’m not a huge fan of his, although he’s a decent OBP guy and a pretty good glove. He’s also a lefty with no pop, and spelling his name all the time on this blog would be a royal pain in the ...

--Posted at 7:18 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (196)




Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Projecting Kei Igawa

With the Yankees winning the posting for Kei Igawa with what seems like an excessively high bid of $26 million, I guess that we should try to figure out what a reasonable expectation for him might be. Cliff Corcoran took an interesting look at Igawa on Bronx Banter already, and I’m going to take a shot as well.

Instead of using the method I used for Daisuke Matsuzaka, I’m going to try a different method which I found by Jim Albright.

Here are Igawa’s career stats for Hanshin.

I took a weighted average of Igawa’s last four seasons and then used Albright’s factors to figure out the MLB translation. One thing to keep in mind is that Igawa played in a non-DH league, so I’ve added another adjustment, to account for the fact that he’ll now be playing in a DH league.

That line looks a lot better than I expected. I’d take that in a heartbeat.

Of course, how a player puts up his numbers is often as important as the numbers themselves, particularly when they are coming from a new league with whole bunch of differences. So I dug around and found a scouting report on Igawa here.

  “He uses a four-seamer in the 88-91 mph range, with that 92+ capability on occasion, and an above-average change that I had in the 78-81 mph area. His breaking ball is a solid slider he’ll throw mostly to lefthanders, though he did use it to backdoor some right-handed bats.

  “It looked like he was playing with a different heater in some starts, perhaps a two-seamer or a sinker of some sorts, but his command of that pitch was very ordinary. His overall control is above average and he’ll probably need to be aware of the base on balls in America.

  “He gets most of his strikeouts on the change and the fastball up in the zone, and I suspect he’s going to continue that trend wherever he ends up. His ground ball tendencies aren’t heavy enough to think he can be considered even a mild version of a ground ball pitcher, and the best hitters in the world will get more lift on his pitches.”

There’s a lot more in the entry above, so you should check out the link. An NL Central scout says:

  “He does make me think of (Jarrod) Washburn,” says one NL Central scout who was assigned to Matsuzaka, and later Igawa by his employers, who were expected to be serious contenders for both pitchers this offseason. “He’s got a little swagger in him, more than Matsuzaka, at least demonstrably. He’ll sit right in the 90mph range until he needs a big strikeout and than he reaches back for added gas. But, like Washburn, he throws quite a few fastballs up in the zone and if he misses with it, it gets hit, and that will be big for him in the U.S,”

Great. A high fastball pitcher who tops out in the low 90s.

After reading more about Igawa and running the numbers, I’m not as down on this signing as I was yesterday. While I think the Yankees overpaid for the rights to just talk to someone who looks like he’ll be putting up a 4.00 ERA, there are benefits to spending the money on the posting fee. It doesn’t count against the luxury tax as many readers here have mentioned, it won’t cost the team a draft pick if he’s signed, and it potentially opens up even more Yankee visiblity in Japan. If the projection above is right, he’ll be about as good as the Ted Lilly/Gil Meche types, with a lot less salary cap impact, even if the total outlay is the same.

--Posted at 4:52 pm by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (236)




Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Lohud Yankees Blog - Abraham: Yankees get rights to Igawa

  WFAN is reporting the Yankees had the high bid for LHP Kei Igawa. More on this as it becomes available.

  Igawa was 14-9 with a 2.97 ERA last season. Given what they have, he’s no better than the No. 4 starter going into spring training. The winning bid was $25 million, which seems like a lot to spend on a No. 4 starter.

I don’t like this very much at all. $25 million plus a contract for a guy who projects as a #4 or #5 at best? Lame.

--Posted at 7:39 pm by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (175)



Page 1 of 1 pages: