Tuesday, December 1, 2009
2009 Yankees Season in Review: Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the Defense
As requested, here’s a look at how Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the overall team defense did compared to their projections.
After a 2008 season that saw him get to AA, Cervelli was still probably off the radar for 2009 despite a brief cameo at the end of 2008. However, injuries forced him into the picture, and he ended up getting 101 PAs. Here are his projections entering 2009, pro-rated to those 101 PAs.
| francisco cervelli | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 101 | 92 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 25 | .223 | .296 | .304 | 53 | .268 | .174 | .221 | .315 | .362 | 95.3% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 101 | 90 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 18 | .272 | .337 | .422 | 82 | .321 | .221 | .271 | .370 | .420 | 114.2% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 24 | .229 | .300 | .335 | 60 | .277 | .182 | .229 | .324 | .372 | 98.5% |
| 2009 tht projection | 101 | 91 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 18 | .236 | .315 | .321 | 59 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.1% |
| 2009 zips projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 18 | .236 | .317 | .304 | 56 | .281 | .186 | .234 | .329 | .377 | 100.2% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 101 | 91 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 21 | .240 | .314 | .326 | 61 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.2% |
| 2009 average projection | 101 | 90 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 21 | .239 | .313 | .335 | 62 | .286 | .190 | .238 | .334 | .382 | 101.8% |
| 2009 actuals | 101 | 94 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | .298 | .309 | .372 | 55 | .281 | .185 | .233 | .329 | .376 |
Cervelli had shown pretty good plate discipline in the minors, but it deserted him in the majors. Despite that, he was able to come fairly close to his projected OBP because he hit six more singles. That also explains why he was able to exceed his SLG by a fair amount.
The .298 average is nice, but it was sort of empty, and it's doubtful he'll be able to replicate the same type of performance in 2010 if he has to rely on hitting .298 to do it. The good news is he should walk a little more and he's still going to be just 24, so he has room for growth in his offensive game. While it's probably unlikely he'll be more than a backup, he should be a decent one, especially if the good defense he showed in 2009 carries forward.
Sort of like Cervelli, Ramiro Pena hadn't gotten past AA prior to 2009, and he hadn't really impressed there either, slugging a monstrous .297 in 2008 for Trenton. Pena's calling card isn't his bat though, it's his glove. In a surprise, he made the Yankees on opening day as a backup IF, since Alex Rodriguez was out rehabbing his hip and the only other backup IF on the roster was Angel Berroa.
Because of Pena's unimpressive minor league resume, his projections were unimpressive.
| ramiro pena | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 121 | 113 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 25 | .233 | .284 | .297 | 48 | .258 | .173 | .215 | .300 | .342 | 86.7% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 121 | 110 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 20 | .224 | .272 | .320 | 50 | .255 | .170 | .212 | .297 | .339 | 85.7% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 121 | 108 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 16 | .223 | .285 | .286 | 47 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .339 | 85.8% |
| 2009 tht projection | 121 | 113 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 22 | .224 | .276 | .291 | 45 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .294 | .336 | 84.8% |
| 2009 zips projection | 121 | 114 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16 | .224 | .269 | .263 | 39 | .240 | .158 | .199 | .282 | .323 | 80.9% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 121 | 112 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 21 | .232 | .282 | .290 | 46 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .340 | 85.9% |
| 2009 average projection | 121 | 112 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 20 | .227 | .278 | .291 | 46 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .295 | .337 | 85.0% |
| 2009 actuals | 121 | 115 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | .287 | .317 | .383 | 71 | .297 | .208 | .253 | .342 | .386 |
Like Cervelli, Pena hit more and walked less than expected. However, he did show a little more pop than projected, with two extra doubles. Obviously when we're dealing with sample sizes like this we shouldn't try to infer too much about what it means going forward, but Pena's final line in 2009 was better than replacement level, and would have made him about a win better than replacement level on offense if he had done it over 650 PAs.
So, how about the Yankee defense?
Since I started blogging in 2004, there's been one recurring theme with the Yankees. Their defense has generally been bad to awful. While you can hit and pitch well enough to overcome that, it can be frustrating to watch players not making plays other players can make.
When the Yankees let Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi go and replaced them with Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher, that alone looked like a pretty decent defensive upgrade. Here's how the defense projected heading into 2009 compared to what they actually ended up doing.
| Player | Pos | pZR | pUZR | pRAA | zRSAA | uRSAA | aRSAA | diff |
| Jorge Posada | C | -5 | -10 | -5 | ||||
| Jose Molina | C | 2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -4 | ||
| Francisco Cervelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Kevin Cash | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
| Mark Teixeira | 1B | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -4 | 2 | -1 |
| Juan Miranda | 1B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 2 | -2 | 0 | -2 | -5 | -3 | -4 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | -2 | -1 | -2 | -6 | -9 | -7 | -6 |
| Cody Ransom | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 |
| Angel Berroa | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -1 | -1 |
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -1 | -1 |
| Brett Gardner | CF | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Johnny Damon | LF | -1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -9 | -5 | -6 |
| Freddy Guzman | LF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Swisher | RF | 1 | 1 | 1 | -4 | -1 | -3 | -4 |
| Eric Hinske | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Xavier Nady | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Jeter | SS | -5 | -5 | -5 | -2 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Ramiro Pena | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | -2 | -27 | -25 |
pZR: Projected runs saved above average according to zone rating, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pUZR: Projected runs saved above average according to UZR, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pRAA: Average of pZR and pUZR
zRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to zone rating
uRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to UZR
aRSAA: Average of zRSAA and uRSAA
diff: aRSAA - pRAA (negative means worse than projected)
The Yankee defense actually didn't play as well as projected, with the primary culprits being Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. Cody Ransom and Angel Berroa's contributions also didn't really help. On the plus side, Derek Jeter was seven runs better than projected and Brett Gardner was two runs better.
Last year's team was about 40 runs below average, so at the very least they were better than that.
Interestingly, I completely forgot to do a season review for Mark Teixeira and Alex Rodriguez, so I'll post that next, then Mo's and then that should wrap up the backwards-looking stuff for now.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Putting Linear Weights in Context, 2009 Edition
About a year ago, I wrote a post about putting linear Weights in context. The linked post has a detailed description of the hows and whys of doing this, so I'll just summarize the process briefly here. I found the spreadsheet I used to calculate that, so I figured I would re-run it for 2009.Linear weights assigns run values to events based on their average impact to a team's run scoring. For example, a single is worth something like 0.47 to 0.49 runs on average. However, that same hit in context can actually be more or less valuable than that. If there is no one on base, a single is only worth about 0.29 runs on average. If the bases are loaded, that exact same single would be worth 1.38 runs on average.
A player can't control the context of when he bats, so looking at something like contextual linear weights should not be used as a way to evaluate a player's talent. However, it can be somewhat useful in looking at how the season has unfolded for that player and/or his team.
So, here's a table showing the Yankees' hitters, their PAs and triple slash stats, their wOBA, then two more columns. The first is context-neutral batting runs using linear weights (cnBR). The next column is also for batting runs, but this time adjusted for whatever baserunners are on base when the player hit (cBR). You can go even further into that by also accounting for the number of outs, but that changes my spreadsheet from eight worksheets to 24, so I don't do that. Fangraphs does calculate these using base out state, which I believe they call wRAA.
The final column (diff) is just cBR - cnBR. A positive number here means the player was better in situations with men on base, a negative number means that he was worse. I'm sure you can guess who's going to be have the largest difference without even looking at the table, but here it is.
One note, the data source I use for this (David Pinto's day by day database) does not split players by team, so players like Eric Hinske and Jerry Hairston Jr. will have their combined stats represented below. Also note that these numbers are NOT position-adjusted, and are compared to AVERAGE, not replacement level.
| player | pa | avg | obp | slg | wOBA | cnBR | cBR | diff |
| Mark Teixeira | 676 | .292 | .383 | .567 | .376 | 43.3 | 39.7 | -3.6 |
| Hideki Matsui | 499 | .278 | .371 | .525 | .367 | 24.8 | 31.1 | 6.3 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 508 | .283 | .402 | .519 | .375 | 29.2 | 26.2 | -3.0 |
| Nick Swisher | 573 | .251 | .368 | .495 | .354 | 21.3 | 22.9 | 1.6 |
| Johnny Damon | 598 | .285 | .366 | .497 | .358 | 22.1 | 21.3 | -0.8 |
| Jorge Posada | 419 | .283 | .360 | .529 | .355 | 16.4 | 20.3 | 4.0 |
| Derek Jeter | 684 | .329 | .399 | .460 | .367 | 26.8 | 14.4 | -12.4 |
| Brett Gardner | 257 | .279 | .354 | .397 | .327 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Eric Hinske | 211 | .242 | .351 | .444 | .331 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 0.2 |
| Robinson Cano | 645 | .320 | .350 | .515 | .352 | 19.2 | 0.5 | -18.8 |
| Freddy Guzman | 1 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Juan Miranda | 1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | .900 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Shelley Duncan | 10 | .200 | .200 | .200 | .180 | -1.3 | -0.7 | 0.6 |
| Xavier Nady | 29 | .286 | .310 | .429 | .303 | -0.8 | -0.9 | -0.1 |
| Ramiro Pena | 108 | .282 | .315 | .359 | .292 | -3.3 | -1.7 | 1.5 |
| Melky Cabrera | 511 | .273 | .335 | .416 | .313 | -1.5 | -2.2 | -0.7 |
| Francisco Cervelli | 89 | .279 | .292 | .349 | .276 | -3.6 | -2.4 | 1.2 |
| Kevin Cash | 28 | .231 | .250 | .308 | .235 | -2.1 | -2.6 | -0.5 |
| Cody Ransom | 86 | .190 | .256 | .329 | .244 | -6.0 | -3.7 | 2.3 |
| Angel Berroa | 53 | .143 | .208 | .184 | .168 | -7.1 | -5.9 | 1.2 |
| Jose Molina | 136 | .221 | .294 | .270 | .259 | -9.1 | -7.2 | 1.9 |
| Jerry Hairston | 415 | .251 | .313 | .397 | .300 | -5.1 | -8.0 | -3.0 |
| Total | 6103 | .284 | .361 | .479 | .366 | 168.8 | 152 | -17 |
wOBA:Weighted on base average
cnBR:Context-neutral batting runs using linear weights
cBR:Batting runs adjusted for base runner state
diff:cBR - cnBR
I expected Cano to look pretty bad here, but not quite this bad. Jeter's number surprised me, considering he's so clutchy and all. At first I thought my calculations must have been wrong, but in actuality, the Yankees component stats on offense say they should have scored something like 20-30 runs more than they have to this point, which this data support (a cumulative total of -17).
On the positive side, you have Hideki Matsui, TSBG and Jorge Posada leading the pack. Most of the rest of the team is clustered right around average, which is what we should expect.
I totally forgot that Kevin Cash was a Yankee this year.
Just for the hell of it, here are the top 100 players in baseball sorted by cBR.
| player | pa | avg | obp | slg | wOBA | cnBR | cBR | diff |
| Albert Pujols | 660 | .330 | .447 | .676 | .399 | 77.5 | 79.6 | 2.2 |
| Prince Fielder | 671 | .297 | .408 | .595 | .385 | 55.1 | 58.6 | 3.6 |
| Jason Bay | 604 | .267 | .387 | .549 | .378 | 36.6 | 52.2 | 15.6 |
| Joe Mauer | 552 | .371 | .442 | .606 | .416 | 55.6 | 49.5 | -6.1 |
| Derrek Lee | 595 | .308 | .392 | .588 | .388 | 43.1 | 49.2 | 6.2 |
| Hanley Ramirez | 621 | .350 | .414 | .553 | .387 | 46.7 | 48.6 | 1.9 |
| Ryan Braun | 659 | .315 | .384 | .541 | .380 | 38.5 | 46.7 | 8.2 |
| Adam Dunn | 627 | .280 | .410 | .556 | .381 | 45.9 | 45.4 | -0.5 |
| Chase Utley | 651 | .294 | .412 | .530 | .390 | 45.4 | 45.2 | -0.2 |
| Kevin Youkilis | 553 | .302 | .410 | .542 | .387 | 38.4 | 42.0 | 3.5 |
| Matt Holliday | 637 | .312 | .391 | .520 | .370 | 34.9 | 40.4 | 5.5 |
| Mark Teixeira | 676 | .292 | .383 | .567 | .376 | 43.3 | 39.7 | -3.6 |
| Miguel Cabrera | 630 | .332 | .402 | .556 | .382 | 41.0 | 39.7 | -1.3 |
| Pablo Sandoval | 590 | .326 | .381 | .545 | .366 | 34.2 | 34.7 | 0.5 |
| Ryan Howard | 660 | .272 | .353 | .564 | .359 | 32.0 | 34.1 | 2.1 |
| Ben Zobrist | 557 | .287 | .400 | .523 | .378 | 34.0 | 33.6 | -0.4 |
| Adrian Gonzalez | 641 | .274 | .399 | .554 | .367 | 40.2 | 33.4 | -6.8 |
| Adam Lind | 631 | .300 | .366 | .541 | .361 | 29.6 | 32.9 | 3.4 |
| Joey Votto | 503 | .314 | .408 | .543 | .380 | 34.5 | 32.0 | -2.5 |
| Hideki Matsui | 499 | .278 | .371 | .525 | .367 | 24.8 | 31.1 | 6.3 |
| Manny Ramirez | 400 | .298 | .420 | .553 | .367 | 31.1 | 30.1 | -0.9 |
| Kendry Morales | 591 | .303 | .349 | .560 | .352 | 26.1 | 29.9 | 3.8 |
| Jayson Werth | 628 | .271 | .376 | .516 | .360 | 29.5 | 29.9 | 0.4 |
| Jason Bartlett | 531 | .319 | .382 | .494 | .364 | 24.2 | 29.3 | 5.1 |
| Torii Hunter | 480 | .303 | .371 | .521 | .361 | 22.2 | 29.0 | 6.8 |
| Justin Upton | 553 | .304 | .371 | .545 | .369 | 28.1 | 28.9 | 0.9 |
| Todd Helton | 602 | .317 | .409 | .480 | .371 | 31.6 | 28.8 | -2.7 |
| Justin Morneau | 590 | .274 | .363 | .516 | .345 | 24.0 | 28.6 | 4.6 |
| Lance Berkman | 521 | .268 | .395 | .504 | .357 | 26.9 | 27.4 | 0.5 |
| Victor Martinez | 636 | .299 | .377 | .473 | .355 | 21.9 | 27.3 | 5.4 |
| Aramis Ramirez | 325 | .322 | .391 | .521 | .377 | 17.0 | 26.5 | 9.5 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 508 | .283 | .402 | .519 | .375 | 29.2 | 26.2 | -3.0 |
| Carlos Pena | 570 | .227 | .356 | .537 | .347 | 25.4 | 25.9 | 0.5 |
| Chipper Jones | 553 | .268 | .391 | .436 | .335 | 18.7 | 24.9 | 6.2 |
| Bobby Abreu | 636 | .293 | .393 | .424 | .348 | 19.5 | 24.6 | 5.1 |
| Brian McCann | 510 | .284 | .347 | .497 | .341 | 12.5 | 24.3 | 11.8 |
| Andre Ethier | 651 | .279 | .364 | .525 | .352 | 26.2 | 23.9 | -2.3 |
| Ichiro Suzuki | 634 | .355 | .388 | .472 | .351 | 27.3 | 23.7 | -3.5 |
| Shin-Soo Choo | 643 | .303 | .397 | .481 | .366 | 30.7 | 23.1 | -7.6 |
| Nick Swisher | 573 | .251 | .368 | .495 | .354 | 21.3 | 22.9 | 1.6 |
| Jim Thome | 427 | .248 | .368 | .485 | .350 | 14.5 | 22.9 | 8.3 |
| Casey McGehee | 362 | .302 | .365 | .503 | .355 | 12.2 | 22.6 | 10.4 |
| Yunel Escobar | 553 | .299 | .378 | .441 | .349 | 12.2 | 22.4 | 10.2 |
| Mark Reynolds | 625 | .266 | .357 | .560 | .365 | 30.7 | 22.4 | -8.3 |
| Nick Johnson | 558 | .291 | .421 | .407 | .364 | 21.5 | 22.3 | 0.8 |
| Paul Konerko | 596 | .283 | .354 | .503 | .347 | 19.1 | 21.4 | 2.3 |
| Jason Kubel | 532 | .300 | .370 | .530 | .356 | 24.7 | 21.4 | -3.3 |
| Johnny Damon | 598 | .285 | .366 | .497 | .358 | 22.1 | 21.3 | -0.8 |
| Brian Roberts | 670 | .286 | .355 | .458 | .336 | 15.8 | 21.2 | 5.4 |
| Evan Longoria | 632 | .283 | .364 | .532 | .352 | 24.3 | 21.2 | -3.1 |
| Andrew McCutchen | 443 | .281 | .354 | .472 | .340 | 12.3 | 20.8 | 8.5 |
| Matt Kemp | 628 | .304 | .360 | .500 | .349 | 21.0 | 20.6 | -0.4 |
| Adam LaRoche | 584 | .283 | .360 | .505 | .344 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 0.0 |
| J.D. Drew | 520 | .267 | .387 | .495 | .362 | 24.5 | 20.5 | -4.0 |
| Raul Ibanez | 533 | .277 | .347 | .565 | .353 | 23.0 | 20.4 | -2.6 |
| Jorge Posada | 419 | .283 | .360 | .529 | .355 | 16.4 | 20.3 | 4.0 |
| Chone Figgins | 686 | .301 | .399 | .401 | .354 | 19.7 | 20.0 | 0.3 |
| Josh Willingham | 466 | .272 | .380 | .520 | .368 | 22.2 | 19.9 | -2.3 |
| Ryan Zimmerman | 651 | .290 | .361 | .518 | .352 | 23.6 | 19.9 | -3.7 |
| Luke Scott | 476 | .252 | .338 | .486 | .331 | 10.8 | 19.9 | 9.1 |
| Christopher Coghlan | 520 | .314 | .385 | .452 | .356 | 18.3 | 19.8 | 1.5 |
| Carlos Beltran | 328 | .332 | .421 | .512 | .374 | 20.9 | 19.4 | -1.5 |
| Troy Tulowitzki | 587 | .288 | .370 | .538 | .365 | 26.8 | 18.9 | -7.8 |
| Brad Hawpe | 558 | .285 | .385 | .506 | .361 | 25.1 | 18.6 | -6.6 |
| Seth Smith | 367 | .302 | .387 | .528 | .371 | 20.5 | 18.2 | -2.4 |
| Alberto Callaspo | 592 | .301 | .355 | .451 | .334 | 9.8 | 18.0 | 8.2 |
| David Wright | 587 | .310 | .395 | .448 | .354 | 20.0 | 17.6 | -2.5 |
| Matt Diaz | 396 | .318 | .391 | .494 | .371 | 17.0 | 17.4 | 0.4 |
| Marco Scutaro | 675 | .282 | .379 | .409 | .344 | 14.4 | 17.1 | 2.7 |
| Aaron Hill | 686 | .286 | .328 | .492 | .335 | 10.6 | 17.1 | 6.5 |
| Billy Butler | 629 | .299 | .358 | .483 | .345 | 15.8 | 16.4 | 0.6 |
| Ryan Ludwick | 506 | .271 | .334 | .449 | .324 | 4.9 | 16.4 | 11.4 |
| Shane Victorino | 648 | .295 | .363 | .448 | .342 | 15.6 | 16.4 | 0.8 |
| Nate McLouth | 538 | .267 | .355 | .447 | .337 | 10.6 | 16.2 | 5.6 |
| Nelson Cruz | 504 | .262 | .335 | .525 | .339 | 15.4 | 16.1 | 0.6 |
| Russell Branyan | 504 | .251 | .347 | .520 | .343 | 18.0 | 16.0 | -1.9 |
| James Loney | 616 | .288 | .364 | .413 | .324 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 8.9 |
| Carlos Lee | 624 | .304 | .349 | .498 | .343 | 16.8 | 15.7 | -1.1 |
| Denard Span | 611 | .305 | .388 | .409 | .347 | 15.4 | 14.9 | -0.5 |
| Michael Young | 573 | .322 | .375 | .523 | .368 | 26.1 | 14.8 | -11.3 |
| Ian Kinsler | 594 | .249 | .320 | .481 | .326 | 7.6 | 14.7 | 7.2 |
| Derek Jeter | 684 | .329 | .399 | .460 | .367 | 26.8 | 14.4 | -12.4 |
| Dustin Pedroia | 666 | .300 | .374 | .446 | .347 | 16.3 | 14.0 | -2.3 |
| Miguel Montero | 439 | .298 | .358 | .479 | .340 | 12.4 | 13.9 | 1.5 |
| Rajai Davis | 383 | .319 | .376 | .435 | .348 | 8.5 | 13.3 | 4.8 |
| Garrett Jones | 310 | .301 | .371 | .594 | .374 | 20.3 | 13.1 | -7.2 |
| Felipe Lopez | 637 | .309 | .380 | .429 | .345 | 16.9 | 13.0 | -3.9 |
| Marlon Byrd | 569 | .282 | .325 | .468 | .322 | 5.8 | 12.8 | 7.0 |
| Scott Rolen | 509 | .308 | .367 | .452 | .345 | 15.0 | 12.6 | -2.4 |
| Cody Ross | 598 | .273 | .323 | .473 | .326 | 3.2 | 12.1 | 8.9 |
| Lyle Overbay | 465 | .269 | .374 | .470 | .345 | 15.6 | 12.1 | -3.5 |
| Nick Markakis | 668 | .293 | .344 | .448 | .332 | 9.2 | 12.1 | 2.8 |
| David DeJesus | 619 | .283 | .349 | .436 | .332 | 7.5 | 11.9 | 4.4 |
| Asdrubal Cabrera | 545 | .305 | .360 | .436 | .336 | 7.5 | 11.8 | 4.3 |
| Adam Jones | 519 | .277 | .335 | .457 | .326 | 4.3 | 11.6 | 7.3 |
| Casey Blake | 554 | .280 | .365 | .472 | .339 | 16.2 | 11.2 | -5.0 |
| Dan Uggla | 629 | .240 | .353 | .458 | .337 | 13.7 | 10.7 | -3.1 |
| Nolan Reimold | 411 | .279 | .365 | .466 | .348 | 11.3 | 10.7 | -0.7 |
| Jonny Gomes | 302 | .268 | .341 | .543 | .351 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 0.2 |
| Michael Cuddyer | 599 | .276 | .336 | .519 | .343 | 13.6 | 10.0 | -3.6 |
When I run these esoteric type stats, there are always names that jump out at me. In this case, it's Jason Bay.
And Albert Pujols is so good in the National League, he could probably hit league average in the AL.
One last table, showing players with an ABS(diff) >= 5.0.
| player | pa | avg | obp | slg | wOBA | cnBR | cBR | diff |
| Jason Bay | 604 | .267 | .387 | .549 | .378 | 36.6 | 52.2 | 15.6 |
| Aubrey Huff | 571 | .245 | .310 | .394 | .289 | -11.2 | 0.9 | 12.1 |
| Brian McCann | 510 | .284 | .347 | .497 | .341 | 12.5 | 24.3 | 11.8 |
| Ryan Ludwick | 506 | .271 | .334 | .449 | .324 | 4.9 | 16.4 | 11.4 |
| Gary Matthews Jr. | 343 | .247 | .335 | .357 | .300 | -4.9 | 5.8 | 10.7 |
| Casey McGehee | 362 | .302 | .365 | .503 | .355 | 12.2 | 22.6 | 10.4 |
| Yunel Escobar | 553 | .299 | .378 | .441 | .349 | 12.2 | 22.4 | 10.2 |
| Pedro Feliz | 584 | .262 | .308 | .381 | .290 | -13.7 | -3.5 | 10.2 |
| Edgar Renteria | 505 | .250 | .307 | .328 | .273 | -21.3 | -11.8 | 9.5 |
| Aramis Ramirez | 325 | .322 | .391 | .521 | .377 | 17.0 | 26.5 | 9.5 |
| Luke Scott | 476 | .252 | .338 | .486 | .331 | 10.8 | 19.9 | 9.1 |
| Cody Ross | 598 | .273 | .323 | .473 | .326 | 3.2 | 12.1 | 8.9 |
| James Loney | 616 | .288 | .364 | .413 | .324 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 8.9 |
| David Eckstein | 515 | .260 | .320 | .333 | .287 | -15.4 | -6.5 | 8.9 |
| Andrew McCutchen | 443 | .281 | .354 | .472 | .340 | 12.3 | 20.8 | 8.5 |
| Kaz Matsui | 481 | .252 | .301 | .354 | .280 | -15.3 | -7.0 | 8.4 |
| Jim Thome | 427 | .248 | .368 | .485 | .350 | 14.5 | 22.9 | 8.3 |
| Alberto Callaspo | 592 | .301 | .355 | .451 | .334 | 9.8 | 18.0 | 8.2 |
| Ryan Braun | 659 | .315 | .384 | .541 | .380 | 38.5 | 46.7 | 8.2 |
| Kurt Suzuki | 581 | .269 | .308 | .411 | .301 | -9.4 | -1.5 | 7.9 |
| Randy Winn | 571 | .260 | .317 | .353 | .288 | -13.7 | -6.1 | 7.6 |
| Adam Jones | 519 | .277 | .335 | .457 | .326 | 4.3 | 11.6 | 7.3 |
| Ian Kinsler | 594 | .249 | .320 | .481 | .326 | 7.6 | 14.7 | 7.2 |
| Kevin Kouzmanoff | 556 | .257 | .304 | .421 | .297 | -12.0 | -4.9 | 7.1 |
| Jason Giambi | 350 | .204 | .349 | .391 | .320 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 7.0 |
| Marlon Byrd | 569 | .282 | .325 | .468 | .322 | 5.8 | 12.8 | 7.0 |
| Josh Anderson | 272 | .240 | .279 | .306 | .258 | -17.0 | -10.1 | 6.9 |
| Torii Hunter | 480 | .303 | .371 | .521 | .361 | 22.2 | 29.0 | 6.8 |
| Nick Punto | 385 | .232 | .332 | .291 | .285 | -12.1 | -5.6 | 6.6 |
| Aaron Hill | 686 | .286 | .328 | .492 | .335 | 10.6 | 17.1 | 6.5 |
| Hideki Matsui | 499 | .278 | .371 | .525 | .367 | 24.8 | 31.1 | 6.3 |
| Chipper Jones | 553 | .268 | .391 | .436 | .335 | 18.7 | 24.9 | 6.2 |
| Derrek Lee | 595 | .308 | .392 | .588 | .388 | 43.1 | 49.2 | 6.2 |
| Rod Barajas | 425 | .231 | .264 | .409 | .270 | -14.3 | -8.2 | 6.1 |
| Chase Headley | 574 | .264 | .340 | .402 | .316 | -3.4 | 2.5 | 6.0 |
| Mark DeRosa | 549 | .256 | .324 | .447 | .320 | 1.5 | 7.4 | 5.9 |
| Nate McLouth | 538 | .267 | .355 | .447 | .337 | 10.6 | 16.2 | 5.6 |
| Brett Gardner | 257 | .279 | .354 | .397 | .327 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Matt Holliday | 637 | .312 | .391 | .520 | .370 | 34.9 | 40.4 | 5.5 |
| Brian Roberts | 670 | .286 | .355 | .458 | .336 | 15.8 | 21.2 | 5.4 |
| Victor Martinez | 636 | .299 | .377 | .473 | .355 | 21.9 | 27.3 | 5.4 |
| Gabe Gross | 311 | .239 | .341 | .373 | .309 | -1.7 | 3.5 | 5.3 |
| Brandon Inge | 585 | .232 | .323 | .418 | .314 | -3.2 | 2.0 | 5.2 |
| Khalil Greene | 187 | .205 | .278 | .355 | .265 | -8.3 | -3.1 | 5.1 |
| Casey Kotchman | 404 | .271 | .342 | .391 | .306 | -1.8 | 3.3 | 5.1 |
| Jason Bartlett | 531 | .319 | .382 | .494 | .364 | 24.2 | 29.3 | 5.1 |
| Bobby Abreu | 636 | .293 | .393 | .424 | .348 | 19.5 | 24.6 | 5.1 |
| Jeff Mathis | 250 | .206 | .288 | .309 | .265 | -12.1 | -7.1 | 5.0 |
| Gerardo Enrique Parra | 462 | .292 | .327 | .408 | .310 | -6.4 | -1.3 | 5.0 |
| Alex Gonzalez | 388 | .239 | .276 | .354 | .259 | -17.5 | -12.5 | 5.0 |
| Carlos Ruiz | 363 | .253 | .353 | .423 | .316 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 5.0 |
| Placido Polanco | 616 | .284 | .330 | .404 | .312 | -5.2 | -0.2 | 5.0 |
| Casey Blake | 554 | .280 | .365 | .472 | .339 | 16.2 | 11.2 | -5.0 |
| Rafael Furcal | 641 | .264 | .331 | .367 | .303 | -10.5 | -15.6 | -5.1 |
| Wladimir Balentien | 279 | .233 | .308 | .382 | .290 | -5.8 | -11.1 | -5.3 |
| Yadier Molina | 527 | .291 | .366 | .383 | .328 | -1.9 | -7.2 | -5.3 |
| Chris Dickerson | 295 | .277 | .373 | .375 | .329 | 2.8 | -2.8 | -5.6 |
| Brendan Harris | 436 | .262 | .310 | .364 | .290 | -14.2 | -20.2 | -6.0 |
| Luis Valbuena | 359 | .234 | .284 | .387 | .279 | -12.7 | -18.7 | -6.0 |
| Fernando Tatis | 351 | .267 | .328 | .415 | .308 | -3.4 | -9.5 | -6.0 |
| Curtis Granderson | 652 | .247 | .328 | .447 | .319 | 6.0 | -0.1 | -6.0 |
| J.J. Hardy | 453 | .228 | .300 | .356 | .283 | -16.3 | -22.3 | -6.1 |
| Joe Mauer | 552 | .371 | .442 | .606 | .416 | 55.6 | 49.5 | -6.1 |
| Dexter Fowler | 472 | .270 | .371 | .414 | .337 | 9.0 | 2.9 | -6.1 |
| Carl Crawford | 640 | .305 | .363 | .452 | .345 | 15.3 | 8.7 | -6.6 |
| A.J. Pierzynski | 516 | .307 | .339 | .436 | .320 | 1.1 | -5.5 | -6.6 |
| Brad Hawpe | 558 | .285 | .385 | .506 | .361 | 25.1 | 18.6 | -6.6 |
| Cameron Maybin | 159 | .218 | .296 | .345 | .272 | -5.8 | -12.4 | -6.6 |
| Adrian Gonzalez | 641 | .274 | .399 | .554 | .367 | 40.2 | 33.4 | -6.8 |
| Garrett Jones | 310 | .301 | .371 | .594 | .374 | 20.3 | 13.1 | -7.2 |
| Ryan Hanigan | 275 | .268 | .360 | .339 | .299 | -2.8 | -10.0 | -7.3 |
| Shin-Soo Choo | 643 | .303 | .397 | .481 | .366 | 30.7 | 23.1 | -7.6 |
| Troy Tulowitzki | 587 | .288 | .370 | .538 | .365 | 26.8 | 18.9 | -7.8 |
| Mike Napoli | 410 | .268 | .346 | .481 | .340 | 9.6 | 1.7 | -8.0 |
| Skip Schumaker | 556 | .304 | .363 | .396 | .329 | 5.3 | -3.0 | -8.2 |
| Mark Reynolds | 625 | .266 | .357 | .560 | .365 | 30.7 | 22.4 | -8.3 |
| Dioner Navarro | 384 | .219 | .260 | .319 | .247 | -26.5 | -34.9 | -8.4 |
| Fred Lewis | 323 | .265 | .356 | .403 | .321 | 2.3 | -6.3 | -8.6 |
| Jeff Francoeur | 597 | .277 | .307 | .411 | .293 | -10.1 | -19.0 | -9.0 |
| Vernon Wells | 639 | .262 | .315 | .402 | .300 | -10.4 | -20.1 | -9.7 |
| Carlos Gonzalez | 283 | .280 | .353 | .520 | .348 | 10.8 | 1.0 | -9.8 |
| Michael Young | 573 | .322 | .375 | .523 | .368 | 26.1 | 14.8 | -11.3 |
| Derek Jeter | 684 | .329 | .399 | .460 | .367 | 26.8 | 14.4 | -12.4 |
| Robinson Cano | 645 | .320 | .350 | .515 | .352 | 19.2 | 0.5 | -18.8 |
Again, I'll reiterate that this doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the skill of these players. All it tells us is the timing of their hits/walks/outs with respect to the state of baserunners when they occurred. It doesn't care about the score of the game, or how many outs there are. A two run single in the first inning of a 15-0 blowout would be worth the same as a two run single that turned a 3-2 deficit into a 4-3 walkoff win. Also, as I stated earlier, these are not position-adjusted and are compared to average, not replacement level. So knock down 1B and corner OFs some and boost catchers and middle infielders.
Monday, October 20, 2008
2009 Defensive Projections for Current and Former Yankees

GP: Games
Inn: Defensive Innings at Position
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double Plays
PM: Plays Made
CH: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
Avg ZR: ZR by average defender at the same position
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games

Inn : Defensive innings at position
PO : Putouts
A : Assists
TE : Throwing errors
FE : Fielding errors
WP+PB: Wild pitches plus passed balls
SBA: Stolen base attempts
SB: Stolen bases
CS: Caught stealings
CS%: Caught stealing percentage (CS / SBA)
RS: Runs saved compared to average
RS/130: Runs saved pro-rated to 130 games
Projections are based on zone rating over the last four seasons for non-catchers, weighted, regressed and aged. For catchers, projections are based on the stats listed for the last five seasons, again weighted, regressed and aged. Don’t read too much into the numbers for players with small sample sizes at their listed positions.
In other Hot Stove stuff:
Agent: Peavy won’t be pitching for Mets, Yankees.
I like Peavy, but I think his numbers get a fair boost from Petco and the NL. Put him in the AL and with the Yankee defense behind him and he’s probably a non-zero amount worse, although still pretty good.
NY Post: YANKS WANT TO OFFER BOWA SECOND THIRD CHANCE.
I can’t see the Dodgers letting him go, but it’d be nice…
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Defense Edition)
Before getting to the pitching, here’s a quick look at how the 2008 Yankees performed defensively compared to their projections. For my defensive statistics, I use zone rating. If you want to read more about how these numbers are calculated you can read this post or this post. If you want a good general overview of zone rating, read this article by Chris Dial.
First up, here’s how I had the Yankees projected on a team level at each position compared to how they actually ended up doing.

Anyone that wants to look at the details behind the defensive projections can check out this entry so I won’t rehash all that here.
Here’s a rundown by position.
Catcher

rvTE +/-: Run value of throwing errors
rvFE +/-: Run value of fielding errors
rvWP+PB+/-: Run value of wild pitches and passed balls
rvSBA+/-: Run value of stolen base attempts
rvSB+/-: Run value of stolen bases
rvCS+/-: Run value of caught stealings
RSAA: Runs saved above average
Jorge Posada’s a very valuable player at catcher, but that’s because of his bat. His defense is usually average or slightly below average. Posada’s injury led to Jose Molina playing a lot more than expected. As we know, he hit like 1991 Bob Geren, but his glove was outstanding. Using my catcher defense system, he was the best defensive catcher in the AL, and second in MLB behind Jason Kendall.
Posada’s shoulder problems led him to be awful, 5 runs below average in just 234 innings. It’s going to be tough to project the 2009 Yankees without knowing if Posada can handle catching the majority of the time. If he can’t throw better than he did in 2008, he probably gives back the majority of his offensive value on defense.
First Base

G: Games
GS: Games started
INN: Defensive innings at position
Ch: Fieldable chances
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double plays
ZR: Zone rating (PM/Ch)
PM: Plays made
AvgPM: Plays made by an average defender over the same # of chances
Diff: PM - AvgPM
RS: Runs saved above average (Diff times run value of play not made)
This projected to be a sore spot defensively because Jason Giambi is just not a good defender. Giambi had a ZR of .801 compared to his projected .796, which is basically the same thing. The Richie Sexson pickup cost the Yankees another four runs at 1B in just 19 games. Nice.
Replacing Giambi with an average defender is probably a ten run upgrade. If they replace him with Teixeira it’s probably close to a 15 run defensive upgrade.
Second Base

Robinson Cano had a very strange season on both sides of the ball. We know he hit like garbage for most of the year. What’s interesting about his defense is he was actually playing very well through July 9, as detailed here. Cano went from a zone rating of .865 and a runs saved above average of +8 to a zone rating of .799 and a runs saved above average of -8 in a span of 49 games. From September 5 on he seemed to recover, putting up a zone rating of .884 and saving 4 runs above average over the rest of the season.
Cano will probably project as an average defender next year instead of a plus defender because of this year, but that’d be a 5 run upgrade.
Third Base

If you just look at the runs saved total for Rodriguez it may seem like he was disappointing, but it’s interesting to note that his zone rating of .786 is actually the highest of his career at 3B. So what happened? The average AL 3B zone rating shot way up to .791 this year, after being about .767 from 2004 - 2007. In a league where .767 is average, Rodriguez would have been a +6 defender.
Morgan Ensberg and Wilson Betemit were both craptacular in limited action, and that’s the main reason 3B was so negative overall. As someone who thought an Ensberg/Betemit platoon could approach league average when Rodriguez opted out, let’s just say it’s a good thing I’m not running the Yankees…
Rodriguez probably won’t be any better defensively next year. At his age we should expect him to lose a run or two of value defensively, so I’d say we should expect 3B to be 2 runs worse next year.
Shortstop

He’s the poster boy for defensive ineptitude, and many of the people who use defensive metrics can barely contain their glee when using them to tear apart his game, but Derek Jeter had a good defensive season this year if you believe zone rating. Whether it was an offseason training regimen that improved his agility, better positioning, or a more favorable distibution of balls in play, the difference between last year was stark, both statistically and visually. Realistically we shouldn’t expect it to happen again in 2009, but he was projected around a -10 coming into 2008, and probably will project to be a -6 or -7 in 2009. 2008 Jeter was more valuable than 2007 Jeter because of the glove.
With the AG gone, backup SS is looking like a problem next year. Cody Ransom did not impress in Fenway defensively.
Left Field

I thought Johnny Damon would end up better in LF and for a while he was above average before falling off, but if he’s the LF next year he should be average or slightly below. Xavier Nady didn’t really impress in LF, but for his career he’s been an average RF (-2 LF in a very small sample size). Hideki Matsui has to be a full-time DH at this point. He was awful this year in LF, and his knees won’t help that.
Center Field

We all know Melky couldn’t hit this year, but he did play solid defense. Damon wasn’t awful in CF, although I doubt he could hold up full-time. Brett Gardner only got 22 games in CF, but his ZR was ridiculously good and he saved 3 runs in very limited time. While I still am not sold on him being able to hit enough to be a starting CF, if his glove and baserunning are as good as they appear to be, it’s very possible he can start in CF with a slightly below average bat. It depends on how below average he is of course.
Right Field

Coming into 2008, Bobby Abreu projected to be about average in RF. Instead he was the absolute worst defensive player in the AL according to zone rating. Abreu’s not obviously bad as far as making errors, but he’s extremely tentative and just doesn’t seem to get to balls that most other players get to. Still, he’s probably not as bad of a defender as his 2008 stats make him look. If I had to project him next year I’d probably project him around a -10 or so. If I were the Yankees I’d still offer him arbitration and hope he declines, because he probably will still be a pretty good player next year if you get stuck with him. I wouldn’t entertain the thought of signing him to a multi-year extension though. Xavier Nady should be able to fill RF next year and play average or slightly below average defense, although he’s not going to hit like Abreu has.
So going into 2008, the Yankees looked to be about two wins worse than an average defense. They actually wound up four wins worse, and that’s almost entirely on Abreu. They should be able to upgrade 1B fairly easily (let’s say +10), Cano should be better at 2B(+5), Jeter will likely be a fair bit worse(-10), Rodriguez and Damon will probably be a little worse(-4 combined). CF depends on if they go with Melky/Gardner or bring someone in(??), and Nady should be better than 2008 Abreu(+15). If Posada is the catcher, that’s a defensive hit(-15).
So minus CF, adding all that up we get +1 compared to 2008. So yeah, don’t expect a much better defense next year.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Offense Edition)
Coming into this season, the Yankees looked to be a contender for best team in baseball. Although they were taking a calculated risk in relying on some very young pitchers, they were returning the bulk of a team that has scored 968 runs last year. Even with expected declines in their older players, they still projected to have the best offense in baseball.
When I ran the Diamond Mind Projection Blowout, they were the best team in the AL in most of the projection systems I used. When I looked at the position players and the pitching staff I arrived at the same basic conclusion, the the Yankees should have won somewhere between 93-97 games.
As we all know, things didn’t work out that way. The question I want to look at is why? Were the projections wrong? Was it injuries? Was it a lack of testicular fortitude? Let’s see if we can figure it out.
The projections I’ll be referencing here are the composite projections of several different systems, as detailed in this February blog entry. I’m going to go through position by position looking at the projected starters compared to what the actual primary starters ended up doing, then looking at the bench as a unit.
One other thing, while offense in the AL was down for most of this year compared to last year, the difference has narrowed signficantly of late to the point that it’s probably no longer statistically significant. The league average line of .268/.336/.420 equates to a BR/650 of 80 this season compared last year’s line of .271/.338/.423 which equates to a BR/650 of 81. The BR(batting runs) I’ll be using here are context-neutral raw batting runs using linear weights, not position-adjusted or adjusted for base-out states.
Catcher
Coming off his career year in 2007, Jorge Posada was projected to give back a fair amount of value in 2008. Posada was projected to hit .286/.380/.469, a performance that would have been worth 76 batting runs according to linear weights using my assumed 500 plate appearances.
Posada went down to a shoulder injury after just 195 PA, which made Jose Molina (Molino for the regulars) the primary starter. While Molino had a strong defensive season, he hit like crap. Molina hit .216/.263/.313 over 297 PA, which was worth 21 batting runs. The difference between Posada’s projection and Molina’s actual performance as the primary starter was 55 runs, which was a 5.5 win underperformance. BTW, disparities in playing time at all the positions will be accounted for when we get to the bench.
First Base
Another risk the Yankees took entering 2008 was that Jason Giambi would be able to
-Out-produce a disastrous 2007
-Play passable defense at first base
-Stay healthy all season
If you had asked me the likelihood of all three of those things happening, I’d have put it around the same likelihood as Mike Mussina winning 20 games.
Giambi managed to achieve all three things for the most part. His glove was bad, but not horrifically bad, and he was productive and healthy for most of the year, although 45% of his production came in the 45 games from April 22 - Jun 17 where he hit .319/.441/.694 (40 BR). Over the other 100 games he played, he hit .213/.342/.414 (48 BR). I don’t know if this type of split is particularly meaningful, so consider it just a random factoid.
The 2008 projections for Giambi weren’t bad on a rate basis (.245/.387/.474) but his playing time projections were pretty pessimistic (300 PA). He projected to be worth about 46 batting runs because of that. Instead, Giambi hit for a little more power but a little less OBP (.247/.373/.502), but thanks to exceeding his playing time projections he was far more valuable than he projected to be, exceeding his projected batting runs by 42 runs, a 4.2 win offensive upgrade. The 2008 Yankees’ underperformance from their pre-season projections can’t be laid at Giambi’s feet.
Second Base
Pass.
Well, I wish I could pass anyway. Robinson Cano seemed to be on the cusp of becoming the best 2B in the AL. Cano projected to hit .308/.348/.482 and play plus defense and was at an age where he could still realistically be expected to improve. Cano’s projected offense over 585 plate appearances would have made him worth 84 batting runs. Instead, Cano digressed in just about every facet of his game, hitting .271/.305/.410 over 634 PA, which was only worth 68 BR. This was a downgrade of 1.6 wins.
Third Base
Boo.
Alex Rodriguez was justifiably the AL’s MVP in 2007. He was rightfully expected to regress somewhat in 2008, projected to hit .300/.406/.574 over 650 PA, which would have been worth 123 batting runs. On a rate basis, he basically hit his projection, but thanks to a leg injury that cost him 56 PA compared to his projection, he was 14 runs less valuable than projected, a downgrade of 1.4 wins. It’s also a fact that Rodriguez’s performance in more crucial plate appearances were less productive than his context-neutral numbers show. This was not a problem exclusive to Rodriguez, so I’ll devote a section to that as well.
Shortstop
Derek Jeter came into 2008 projected to hit .307/.379/.438 over 600 PA, which would have been worth 86 BR. A late hot streak pushed him closer to his projections as he ended the season at .300/.363/.408 over 668 PA, a total of 82 BR. He was less valuable than projected on a rate basis, but by exceeding his projected playing time his overall value was only about four runs less than projected.
Left Field
Johnny Damon was shifted to LF due to his defensive decline, the seeming emergence of Melky Cabrera and Hideki Matsui’s bad knees. This looked like a disaster in the making coming off a poor offensive 2007, although it did also seem like a defensive upgrade. Damon projected to hit .280/.353/.423 over 585 PA, a line that would have been worth 78 batting runs. He blew that away by hitting .303/.375/.461 over 623 PA. So like first base, left field ended up as a net gain on the pre-season projections, to the tune of 15 runs, or 1.5 wins.
Center Field
After a promising rookie season, Melky Cabrera declined in 2007. The projections expected him to bounce back, thanks in part to his youth. Melky was projected to hit .282/.344/.406 over 550 PA for a total of 68 BR. Instead, he got even worse, hitting .249/.301/.341 over 453 PA before mercifully being demoted to Scranton. Cabrera’s line was a downgrade of 27 BR, or 2.7 wins. And that’s all I have to say about that.
Right Field
Bobby Abreu came into 2008 projected to hit .277/.383/.439 over 600 PA, which would have been worth 89 BR. He exceeded that by hitting .296/.371/.471 over 684 PA, worth a total of 101 BR. Luckily for Abreu, we’re ignoring defense for now, and this was an offensive upgrade of 12 runs or 1.2 wins.
Designated Hitter
Hideki Matsui was penciled in as the primary DH coming into 2008 and his projection was pretty good, .287/.367/.477 over 500 PA, equivalent to around 74 BR. Unfortunately, after a hot start to the season, Matsui’s knees gave out on him and he missed a significant part of the season and when he managed to come back was very unproductive, ending 2008 with a line of .294/.370/.424 over 378 PA for a total of 50 BR. That’s a 24 run/2.4 win falloff.
So just looking at the starting nine, we see that the Yankees projected to hit .289/.372/.465 over 4870 PA, which would have been worth 724 BR. Instead, the starting nine hit .280/.352/.443 over 4896 PA, for a total of 653 BR. That’s a 71 run drop off or 7.1 win drop off.

The Bench
Projecting the bench is usually tricky, but at least on paper the Yankee bench looked to be serviceable this year, with Wilson Betemit, Morgan Ensberg, Jose Molina, Shelley Duncan, Brett Gardner, Alberto Gonzalez, Nick Green, Jason Lane and Chris Woodward the likely candidates to see playing time. I had the bench projected to hit .247/.319/.404 over 1811 PA, which would have been worth 209 BR. Instead, the collection of Betemit, Ensberg, Posada, Duncan, Gardner, Gonzalez, Justin Christian, Francisco Cervelli, Juan Miranda, Chad Moeller, Xavier Nady, Ivan Rodriguez, Richie Sexson, Chris Stewart and Cody Ransom hit over .244/.306/.380 over 1339 PA for a total of 140 BR. That’s a 69 run underperformance.
Clutchness
Regular watchers of the 2008 Yankees as well as regular readers of this blog also know from a variety of different methods that the Yankees underperformed with runners on base. Using the method I like best (Fangraph’s batting runs above average based on run expectancy), here’s a look at how the Yankees’ players context neutral batting runs compared to their contextualized batting runs in 2008.

Overall, the difference was small, but I think we can all pick out several games where the Yankees failure to come up with hits in big spots cost them wins.
cnBRAA: context-neutral batting runs above average.
cxtBRAA: contextualized batting runs above average.
Diff: cxtBRAA - cnBRAA.
I don’t know how good or bad the team baserunning has been aside from stolen bases, which are already included in the batting runs above, so we’ll assume they were average.
Let’s roll all that up.

So we had a team that was supposed to score 933 runs or so. Their starting nine created 71 fewer runs than expected, and their bench created 69 fewer than expected, for a total shortfall of around 141 runs. Subract another three runs for unclutchness.
933 run projection - 141 actual underperformance - 3 clutchness = 789.
How many runs did the 2008 Yankees score? 789. That’s creepy, huh?
If you were to rate the biggest reasons for the Yankees’ offensive underperformance, it’d be:
1) Losing Jorge Posada (55 runs)
2) Melky Cabrera sucking ass (27 runs)
3) Hideki Matsui’s knee causing him to both miss time and to underperform when he returned (24 runs)
4) Robinson Cano becoming Wayne Tolleson (16 runs)
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Batting Runs Above Average Using Run Expectancy
My post about contextualizing linear weights got linked over at The Book Blog, which led to a new discovery for me. Fangraphs, which is really a wonderful site for stat dorks, tracks a version of batting runs above average that is not context-neutral. Instead, they use the difference in run expectancy before and after every plate appearance or batters faced. The full glossary definition is here, but here’s the heart of it.
BRAA (batting runs above average): BRAA is the difference in run expectancy (RE) between the start of the play and the end of the play. That difference is then credited/debited to the batter and the pitcher.
What I like about this is it adds the out state to the base states I was using, and it includes pitchers, and it doesn’t give different weights based on innings or scores. Basically, you look at what an average player adds to his team on each specific play for each of the 24 base/out states, then you compare that to what each player actually does.
Since it includes pitchers we can do direct comparisons of everyone on the team and see how they’ve stacked up this year as well.
Here’s the offense.

Here are the starting pitchers.

Here are the relievers.

And here’s everyone.

These numbers are not position-adjusted, so you may want to account for that. Here are my 2008 AL position adjustments based on 650 PAs.
C 10
1B -5
2B 0
3B 0
SS 12
LF -4
CF -3
RF -6
DH -6
So you’d subtract around 5 runs from Giambi’s value, you’d add around 12 to Jeter’s (pro-rated). Here’s how the overall chart looks if we position-adjust for the offensive players.

These numbers are against average, not replacement level. Also as a reminder, a measure like this is not necessarily supposed to be predictive, it’s retroactive.
This says that in total, the Yankees have been about four wins better than average including everything except baserunning and defense, although I think the bulk of defense is included in the pitchers’ BRAA. An average team over 151 games would be 76-75 or so, and the Yankees are 80-71, or four games better than average.
Update(s):
As requested by DaPuj, I’ve added the context neutral batting runs above average for the position players to the overall Yankee chart.

And here’s the top 25 in the AL for contextualized, position adjusted BRAA for position players.

And the bottom 25.

Lastly, adding in pitchers here’s the top 50.
Monday, August 11, 2008
Clutchness and the 2008 Yankees
In the previous thread, PhilRizzuto raised a question about how bad the Yankees have been hitting this year with runners in scoring position. I think anyone who's watched this team all season knows they've been bad even without looking at the numbers, but since I'm a stat dork, let's look at some stats.First off, let's take a look at the 2008 Diamond Mind Projection Blowout. According to the aggregate of six different projection systems, the Yankees projected to score 924 runs this year. Losing Alex Rodriguez for a month and losing Jorge Posada obviously put a damper on that.
In addition, the run environment in the AL is down this year. Last year, AL teams averaged 4.93 runs per game and hit for a line of .271/.338/.423. This year they are averaging 4.71 runs per game and are hitting .266/.334/.416. So that's around a 4% reduction in run scoring. The standard deviation on the AL runs scored using last year's total of 11185 is 106 runs, so one standard deviation in either direction gives us 4.88 runs per game to 4.98 runs per game. Two standard deviations gives us 4.84 runs to 5.02 runs per game. So the lower AL scoring this season appears to be statistically significant.
| Rank | Team | RF/G |
| 1 | Texas | 5.61 |
| 2 | Detroit | 5.09 |
| 3 | Chicago Sox | 5.01 |
| 4 | Boston | 5.00 |
| 5 | Minnesota | 4.97 |
| 6 | Baltimore | 4.92 |
| 7 | NY Yankees | 4.82 |
| 8 | LA Angels | 4.73 |
| 9 | Cleveland | 4.66 |
| 10 | Tampa Bay | 4.61 |
| 11 | Toronto | 4.24 |
| 12 | Kansas City | 4.20 |
| 13 | Seattle | 4.12 |
| 14 | Oakland | 4.02 |
Still, the Yankees are 7th in the league in actual runs scored.
But what about the park factors you ask? Using a weighted average of 2006-2008, here's how the rankings would look (park factors from The 4 letter.com).
| Rank | Team | PkAdj RF/G |
| 1 | Texas | 5.39 |
| 2 | Minnesota | 5.30 |
| 3 | Detroit | 4.91 |
| 4 | Tampa Bay | 4.81 |
| 5 | Chicago Sox | 4.81 |
| 6 | Boston | 4.75 |
| 7 | Baltimore | 4.73 |
| 8 | NY Yankees | 4.66 |
| 9 | LA Angels | 4.61 |
| 10 | Cleveland | 4.60 |
| 11 | Toronto | 4.33 |
| 12 | Seattle | 4.26 |
| 13 | Oakland | 4.23 |
| 14 | Kansas City | 4.14 |
Either way, the Yankee offense has been mediocre this year, despite projecting to be one of the better ones in the league. They are on pace to score 781 runs, That's a falloff of almost 200 runs from last season.
According to linear weights, the context-independent batting events that the Yankee offense has accrued this year should total 586 runs. Using runs created instead of linear weights says they should have scored 598. So why have they only scored 568?
First of all, the Yankees have hit into what seems like a million double plays. The actual number is 109, which is the fourth highest total in the league. Adding those DPs into linear weights knocks the runs scored estimate down by 11 runs. But getting back to the clutch thing, The Hardball Times tracks a stat called 'clutch' coincidentally enough. Now the whole concept of clutch is murky and hard to define, so this is just one of probably a million different ways to measure it. Anyway, the definition of clutch they are using is based of the 2002 version of Bill James's runs created and is defined as:
Hits(with runners in scoring position) - (AB with RISP times BA) + HR(with runners on base) - (AB(with runners on base) times HR)/AB).
or

Clutch is expressed in terms of runs above and below average. Here's how the Yankees rate.
| Tm | Clutch |
| MIN | 37 |
| LAA | 35 |
| BAL | 27 |
| OAK | 22 |
| KC | 20 |
| CHA | 14 |
| CLE | 14 |
| TEX | 12 |
| DET | -9 |
| TOR | -11 |
| SEA | -11 |
| BOS | -15 |
| TB | -18 |
| NYA | -26 |
I know it's hard to believe, but yes, the Yankees are the unclutchest(is that a word?) team in the AL this year. Here are the individuals and their clutch rankings.
| Last, First | Tm | Lg | Pos | Clutch |
| Damon, Johnny | NYA | AL | LF | 7 |
| Abreu, Bobby | NYA | AL | RF | 4.5 |
| Gardner, Brett | NYA | AL | LF | 3.6 |
| Christian, Justin | NYA | AL | LF | 1.8 |
| Matsui, Hideki | NYA | AL | DH | 0.8 |
| Sexson, Richie | NYA | AL | 1B | 0.5 |
| Moeller, Chad | NYA | AL | C | 0.4 |
| Jeter, Derek | NYA | AL | SS | 0.1 |
| Stewart, Chris D | NYA | AL | C | 0 |
| Duncan, Shelley | NYA | AL | 1B | -0.3 |
| Posada, Jorge | NYA | AL | C | -1.2 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto R | NYA | AL | SS | -1.3 |
| Ensberg, Morgan | NYA | AL | 3B | -1.6 |
| Cano, Robinson | NYA | AL | 2B | -1.7 |
| Nady, Xavier | NYA | AL | LF | -2.1 |
| Molina, Jose | NYA | AL | C | -3.5 |
| Betemit, Wilson | NYA | AL | 1B | -3.9 |
| Rodriguez, Ivan | NYA | AL | C | -5.3 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYA | AL | CF | -5.5 |
| Giambi, Jason | NYA | AL | 1B | -10.3 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | NYA | AL | 3B | -13.2 |
Now I'm not really going to get into the whole clutch hitting as a skill thing here. Well, maybe just for a second. This is not a measure of a player's clutch skill/ability, it's a measure of their value in the current season. Last year, Alex Rodriguez's clutch rating was +9.8. Did Madonna make him unclutch? In 2006 it was +3.2, in 2005 it -8.8.
It's definitely a problem when your two best offensive players aren't hitting with runners in scoring position though. And how the hell is Pudge -5.3 already? He's only played in like 5 games.
If we add those clutch values to the players' position-adjusted batting runs above replacement level here's how the players rank.
| Last, First | Tm | Lg | Pos | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | pBRAR | Clutch | Total |
| Damon, Johnny | NYA | AL | LF | 443 | .322 | .392 | .459 | 26.9 | 7 | 33.9 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | NYA | AL | 3B | 420 | .315 | .402 | .599 | 45.4 | -13.2 | 32.2 |
| Abreu, Bobby | NYA | AL | RF | 500 | .287 | .358 | .467 | 19.2 | 4.5 | 23.7 |
| Giambi, Jason | NYA | AL | 1B | 397 | .252 | .393 | .517 | 29.5 | -10.3 | 19.2 |
| Jeter, Derek | NYA | AL | SS | 499 | .283 | .346 | .398 | 18.9 | 0.1 | 19.0 |
| Matsui, Hideki | NYA | AL | DH | 285 | .323 | .404 | .458 | 14.5 | 0.8 | 15.3 |
| Posada, Jorge | NYA | AL | C | 195 | .268 | .364 | .411 | 8.6 | -1.2 | 7.4 |
| Nady, Xavier | NYA | AL | LF | 58 | .365 | .431 | .731 | 8.0 | -2.1 | 5.9 |
| Christian, Justin | NYA | AL | LF | 39 | .278 | .333 | .361 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Sexson, Richie | NYA | AL | 1B | 30 | .292 | .400 | .458 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 2.2 |
| Moeller, Chad | NYA | AL | C | 84 | .227 | .310 | .333 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Stewart, Chris D | NYA | AL | C | 3 | .000 | .000 | .000 | -0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| Gardner, Brett | NYA | AL | LF | 68 | .153 | .227 | .169 | -4.8 | 3.6 | -1.2 |
| Duncan, Shelley | NYA | AL | 1B | 65 | .175 | .262 | .281 | -2.9 | -0.3 | -3.2 |
| Cano, Robinson | NYA | AL | 2B | 461 | .263 | .300 | .397 | -3.1 | -1.7 | -4.8 |
| Rodriguez, Ivan | NYA | AL | C | 19 | .278 | .316 | .444 | 0.2 | -5.3 | -5.1 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto R | NYA | AL | SS | 58 | .173 | .232 | .212 | -3.9 | -1.3 | -5.2 |
| Betemit, Wilson | NYA | AL | 1B | 153 | .253 | .276 | .411 | -2.2 | -3.9 | -6.1 |
| Ensberg, Morgan | NYA | AL | 3B | 80 | .203 | .263 | .243 | -5.1 | -1.6 | -6.7 |
| Molina, Jose | NYA | AL | C | 237 | .230 | .278 | .315 | -4.1 | -3.5 | -7.6 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYA | AL | CF | 435 | .245 | .299 | .341 | -7.9 | -5.5 | -13.4 |
Alex Rodriguez and Jason Giambi's clutch performances hurt their value, but they still have been valuable this year, just not as valuable as the raw numbers may show. Johnny Popup isn't a bad player, but if he's your most valuable offensive performer you probably have issues. And boy, does Melky stink.
Do I think clutch hitters exist? Not really, but I do think unclutch hitters can exist, and I do think pressure can have some impact, although it's my opinion that it's not nearly as big of a deal as it's made out to be by the mass media. Also, this is just one definition of clutch, a different definiton may show something totally different, so keep that in mind.
So yeah, the 2008 Yankees have been unclutch by this measure. I'm guessing you didn't need a blog entry to know that though.
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Yankee Defense by Zone Rating through May 18, 2008
| Player | Pos | G | INN | PO | A | E | DP | Ch | ZR | Avg ZR | PM | AvgPM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Giambi, Jason | 1B | 31 | 268.2 | 296 | 13 | 2 | 26 | 59 | .814 | .867 | 48 | 51 | -3 | -3 | -14 |
| Duncan, Shelley | 1B | 8 | 63 | 59 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 1.000 | .867 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| Ensberg, Morgan | 1B | 6 | 34 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1.000 | .867 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 |
| Betemit, Wilson | 1B | 2 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.000 | .867 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| Posada, Jorge | 1B | 1 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | .667 | .867 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | -86 |
| Damon, Johnny | 1B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .867 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cano, Robinson | 2B | 43 | 364.2 | 86 | 140 | 4 | 32 | 151 | .841 | .829 | 127 | 125 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto | 2B | 3 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 9 | .778 | .829 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | -24 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | 3B | 21 | 178 | 15 | 47 | 2 | 6 | 56 | .893 | .800 | 50 | 45 | 5 | 4 | 34 |
| Ensberg, Morgan | 3B | 17 | 124 | 8 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 45 | .689 | .800 | 31 | 36 | -5 | -4 | -47 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto | 3B | 10 | 53.2 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 14 | .857 | .800 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 17 |
| Betemit, Wilson | 3B | 5 | 30 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 15 | .667 | .800 | 10 | 12 | -2 | -2 | -77 |
| Cabrera, Melky | CF | 42 | 352.2 | 98 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 107 | .907 | .901 | 97 | 96 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Damon, Johnny | CF | 4 | 33 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | .714 | .901 | 5 | 6 | -1 | -1 | -48 |
| Damon, Johnny | LF | 33 | 272.1 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | .892 | .846 | 58 | 55 | 3 | 2 | 13 |
| Matsui, Hideki | LF | 14 | 113.1 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | .694 | .846 | 25 | 30 | -5 | -5 | -58 |
| Abreu, Bobby | RF | 42 | 353.2 | 77 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 94 | .830 | .867 | 78 | 81 | -3 | -3 | -12 |
| Matsui, Hideki | RF | 3 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.000 | .867 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| Duncan, Shelley | RF | 3 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.000 | .867 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| Jeter, Derek | SS | 38 | 328.2 | 45 | 95 | 4 | 19 | 113 | .796 | .837 | 90 | 95 | -5 | -3 | -15 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto | SS | 5 | 41 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 1.000 | .837 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 52 |
| Betemit, Wilson | SS | 3 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | .833 | .837 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
Pos: Position
G: Games
INN: Defensive Innings at Position
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double Plays
Ch: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
Avg ZR: ZR by average defender at the same position and in the same league
PM: Plays Made
AvgPM: Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Why The Yankees Are Losing
The chart below shows the Yankees' average projections pro-rated to their actual playing time this season on the left. On the right are the actual YTD performance.| Team | NYA | Proj | Actual | |||||||||||
| Starters | POS | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | Diff | ||
| Jorge Posada | C | 66 | .293 | .392 | .499 | 11 | 66 | .302 | .333 | .476 | 9 | -2 | ||
| Jason Giambi | 1B | 139 | .256 | .399 | .499 | 23 | 139 | .193 | .345 | .468 | 19 | -3 | ||
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 164 | .312 | .347 | .489 | 24 | 164 | .208 | .256 | .318 | 10 | -13 | ||
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | 99 | .300 | .402 | .569 | 18 | 99 | .286 | .343 | .495 | 15 | -4 | ||
| Derek Jeter | SS | 163 | .318 | .388 | .463 | 25 | 163 | .314 | .346 | .431 | 20 | -5 | ||
| Johnny Damon | LF | 175 | .286 | .357 | .438 | 24 | 175 | .257 | .341 | .454 | 24 | 0 | ||
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 158 | .281 | .341 | .403 | 19 | 158 | .262 | .325 | .426 | 19 | 0 | ||
| Bobby Abreu | RF | 176 | .284 | .392 | .461 | 28 | 176 | .288 | .352 | .450 | 23 | -5 | ||
| Hideki Matsui | DH | 163 | .291 | .370 | .489 | 25 | 163 | .306 | .387 | .458 | 24 | -1 | ||
| Starters Total | 1303 | .292 | .373 | .471 | 197 | 1303 | .287 | .336 | .436 | 163 | -34 | |||
| Bench | POS | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | Diff | ||
| Shelley Duncan | 1B | 41 | .257 | .322 | .480 | 6 | 41 | .194 | .293 | .250 | 3 | -3 | ||
| Chad Moeller | C | 41 | .231 | .287 | .373 | 4 | 41 | .243 | .317 | .378 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Alberto Gonzalez | SS | 41 | .250 | .300 | .351 | 4 | 41 | .257 | .333 | .314 | 4 | 0 | ||
| Jose Molina | C | 84 | .250 | .287 | .375 | 8 | 84 | .203 | .220 | .304 | 5 | -4 | ||
| Chris Stewart | C | 3 | .250 | .300 | .375 | 0 | 3 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | -1 | ||
| Morgan Ensberg | 3B | 76 | .261 | .368 | .467 | 11 | 76 | .214 | .276 | .257 | 4 | -7 | ||
| Wilson Betemit | SS | 27 | .265 | .338 | .443 | 4 | 27 | .269 | .296 | .462 | 3 | 0 | ||
| Bench Total | 313 | .256 | .316 | .410 | 36 | 313 | .233 | .275 | .308 | 22 | -14 | |||
| Team Total | 1616 | .285 | .362 | .459 | 233 | 1616 | .258 | .325 | .410 | 186 | -48 |
BR here are batting runs by linear weights (not position-adjusted or compared to average). Apart from Johnny Damon and Melky Cabrera, every Yankee starter has provided less offense than projected and overall the starters are 34 runs below their expectations. The bench has also significantly underperformed to the tune of 14 runs below expectations.
The Yankees are 48 runs below expectations even accounting for the injuries to Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. That's five wins, and it at least partially explains why they are 20-23. If the offense had played as expected, they'd be 25-18, which is a 94 win pace and right around where they should have been. Offense is down in the AL by around 11% this season, but the Yankees are scoring 20% less frequently than expected so that's not the whole explanation.
The pitching and defense have not been the problem. The defense is below average but it was supposed to be. The pitching staff has been a little worse than average, but not egregiously so (-2 runs saved above average). It's the lack of offense that's killing this team. Unfortunately, I don't see any moves that can be done to fix that.
Monday, April 21, 2008
April 21 - Yankee Offense Projections vs. Actuals
So the team that I projected to score around 930 runs this year is on pace to score 689, which would rank ninth in the AL if things held up. Here's a look at each player's contributions to that.| Player | pAVG | pOBP | pSLG | pBR | aAVG | aOBP | aSLG | aBR | Brdiff |
| Jose Molina | .243 | .280 | .360 | 3 | .333 | .333 | .528 | 6 | 3 |
| Chad Moeller | .225 | .299 | .348 | 2 | .350 | .435 | .600 | 5 | 3 |
| Hideki Matsui | .287 | .367 | .477 | 11 | .323 | .405 | .523 | 13 | 2 |
| Melky Cabrera | .282 | .344 | .406 | 8 | .281 | .353 | .456 | 10 | 1 |
| Alberto Gonzalez | .253 | .301 | .348 | 2 | .333 | .400 | .467 | 3 | 1 |
| Morgan Ensberg | .248 | .365 | .446 | 3 | .333 | .333 | .500 | 3 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | .243 | .311 | .453 | 1 | .200 | .200 | .200 | 0 | -1 |
| Johnny Damon | .280 | .353 | .423 | 11 | .215 | .333 | .400 | 10 | -1 |
| Bobby Abreu | .277 | .383 | .439 | 12 | .306 | .367 | .458 | 11 | -1 |
| Alex Rodriguez | .300 | .406 | .574 | 16 | .308 | .357 | .551 | 14 | -1 |
| Wilson Betemit | .258 | .333 | .445 | 2 | .154 | .214 | .154 | 0 | -2 |
| Derek Jeter | .307 | .379 | .438 | 8 | .309 | .339 | .418 | 7 | -2 |
| Jorge Posada | .286 | .380 | .469 | 7 | .261 | .306 | .391 | 5 | -2 |
| Jason Giambi | .245 | .387 | .474 | 9 | .109 | .288 | .283 | 5 | -4 |
| Robinson Cano | .308 | .348 | .482 | 12 | .169 | .200 | .234 | 2 | -9 |
| Total | .280 | .362 | .453 | 107 | .265 | .331 | .425 | 93 | -13 |
pAVG: Projected batting average
pOBP: Projected on base percentage
pSLG: Projected slugging average
pBR: Projected batting runs (pro-rated to actual playing time, not position-adjusted)
aAVG: Actual batting average
aOBP: Actual on base percentage
aSLG: Actual slugging average
aBR: Actual batting runs (pro-rated to actual playing time, not position-adjusted)
Brdiff: Difference between projected batting runs and actual, pro-rated to actual playing time
There are some rounding issues in the table above so if things don't seem to add up here, trust me, they actually do in Excel. The batting runs are adjusted for actual playing time so it's a direct comparison, but no position-adjusment is included. The Yankee offense theoretically should have scored 13 fewer runs than you'd expect given the allocation of playing time and the players' projections on offense. They're actually even worse than that at 85 runs, thanks to poor hitting in the clutch primarily.
God bless Molino and Moello, or they'd be six runs worse than that. Add in the pitching staff, which has the fifth worst RA in the AL at 4.82 and has saved five fewer runs than average, and you have a 23 run deficit, which is about 2.3 wins. Not coincidentally, they sit 10-10 while log5 says they should have expected to be 11.6 - 8.4 to this point.
For all the crap Giambi's been getting, Cano is the single biggest problem on this team. He's been so bad offensively that even with the +1 defense he's played so far, his overall "value" to the team is -8 runs. Let's hope for a heat wave soon.
Friday, April 11, 2008
Worst Offense Ever Takes a Night Off
In a shocking turn of events, the Yankees managed to score a decent number of runs last night, beating the Royals 6-1. Granted, two of the runs came in the ninth inning against Hideo Nomo, who I could have sworn has been retired for a few years, but it was still good to see. Jorge Posada's HR was especially nice considering the way he has started the season off with his injury and ineffectiveness.More important than the offensive outburst was Andy Pettitte's good pitching. Pettitte went six and two-thirds innings and allowed just one run and five hits. The Yankees really need Pettitte and Wang to do what they are projected to do this season if they want to have a shot at the postseason. it was still a save situation when Pettitte was pulled so Joba Chamberlain pitched the end of the seventh as well as the eighth. I like seeing Joba pitch more than one inning because I still think he should end up in the rotation. Mariano Rivera came in to pitch the ninth despite the Yankees adding a couple of runs, which was fine, he hadn't pitched for a few days and was already warmed up anyway. One thing that I noticed last night is Mo was throwing a lot of two-seamers. I'd like to see him continue to do that.
Now comes three games against some .500 team. Your pitching matchups for the weekend:
Friday April 11: C. Wang (2-0,1.38) vs. C. Buchholz (0-1,5.40)
Saturday April 12: M. Mussina (1-1,3.09) vs. J. Beckett (0-1,9.64)
Sunday April 13: P. Hughes (0-1,5.00) vs. D. Matsuzaka (2-0,1.47)
I hate these series, mainly because of the ridiculous hype certain media outlets try to give these games. It's an interesting set of matchups. Wang makes his first road start of the year and the Yankees haven't seen Buccholz before, so hopefully he doesn't no-hit them. Beckett's still working his way back to full strength but Moose is going to have to try to trick one of the better lineups in baseball, and who knows what either Hughes or Matsuzaka will bring on Sunday night?
Since I don't know how long this will last, here's an early meaningless and small sample size look at how the Yankee defense has performed according to zone rating so far this season.
| Player | Pos | G | INN | Ch | ZR | PM | AvgPM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Giambi, Jason | 1B | 6 | 43 | 11 | .818 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 0 | -15 |
| Ensberg, Morgan | 1B | 3 | 17 | 3 | 1.000 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Betemit, Wilson | 1B | 2 | 11 | 2 | 1.000 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| Duncan, Shelley | 1B | 1 | 9 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cano, Robinson | 2B | 10 | 88 | 43 | .837 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | 3B | 10 | 87 | 29 | .931 | 27 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 50 |
| Betemit, Wilson | 3B | 1 | 1 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Molina, Jose | C | 7 | 55 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Posada, Jorge | C | 4 | 33 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Cabrera, Melky | CF | 8 | 70 | 21 | .810 | 17 | 19 | -2 | -2 | -31 |
| Damon, Johnny | CF | 2 | 18 | 3 | 1.000 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| Damon, Johnny | LF | 6 | 53 | 9 | 1.000 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 28 |
| Matsui, Hideki | LF | 3 | 27 | 7 | .571 | 4 | 6 | -2 | -2 | -90 |
| Abreu, Bobby | RF | 8 | 70 | 10 | .900 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Matsui, Hideki | RF | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Duncan, Shelley | RF | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 137 |
| Jeter, Derek | SS | 7 | 56 | 26 | .731 | 19 | 22 | -3 | -2 | -54 |
| Gonzalez, Alberto | SS | 2 | 17 | 5 | 1.000 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 52 |
| Betemit, Wilson | SS | 2 | 15 | 5 | 1.000 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 58 |
| Total | 84 | 680 | 178 | .854 | 152 | 150 | 2 | 1 | 21 |
INN: Defensive Innings at Position
Ch: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
PM: Plays Made
AvgPM: Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games
Melky's had some tough chances so I wouldn't pay much heed to his numbers yet, but I think Hideki Matsui needs to be kept out of the outfield whenever possible. For those of you thinking Alex Rodriguez is playing Gold Glove caliber defense this year, you're right.
In bad news down on the farm, Alan Horne suffered some kind of injury in his start last night and will have an MRI today. Let's hope for good news there.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Oh Where, Oh Where Has My Little Offense Gone?
While my head knows that nine games is still way too small of a sample size to draw undue distinctions from, it sure didn’t feel like it while I watched the again punchless Yankees fall to Kansas City 4-0 last night. Granted, sometimes you run into a Roy Halladay. Sometimes you run into A.J. Burnett. Sometimes you run into Dustin McGowan. Sometimes you run into Andy Sonnastine. Sometimes you run into Edwin Jackson. Sometimes you run into James Shields. Sometimes you run into Jason Hammel. Sometimes you run into Brian Bannister. Sometimes you run into Zach Greinke. But come on, ALL NINE OF THEM?
With a forecast of rain all night, Joe Girardi pulled Ian Kennedy from starting the game and went with Brian Bruney to start the game. The reason given was so that they wouldn’t start the game with Kennedy and then lose him if the rain stopped the game. Considering the grief Girardi got for bringing back Josh Johnson from a long rain delay when he managed the Marlins in 2006 and Johnson’s subsequent breakdown which may or not have been related, this was pretty interesting out of the box thinking. For the most part it seemed to work well, although it likely cost the Yankees the use of Bruney and Farnsworth in today’s game. That’s probably bad in the former case but not necessarily so in the latter case. Kennedy ended up pitching the 6th through 8th, starting off poorly but finishing off pretty well.
The pitching didn’t really matter because the offense continued to stink. Here’s how the Yankees rate by position-adjusted batting runs above average using linear weights to this point.
Matsui : 2
Abreu : 1.5
Rodriguez : 0.7
Molina : 0.3
Gonzalez : 0.2
Cabrera : 0.1
Ensberg : -0.5
Damon : -0.5
Duncan : -0.5
Betemit : -1
Jeter : -1.5
Posada : -1.9
Giambi : -2.4
Cano : -4.4
How is Damon not worse? Hey Robinson, feel free to stop sucking. How bad has Cano been? Here are the five worst offensive players so far in the AL this season by position-adjusted BRAA:
Crawford : -4.3
Johjima : -4.3
Ortiz : -4.3
Cano : -4.4
Polanco : -4.6
Only Placido Polanco has been worse. He’s in good company with David Ortiz and Carl Crawford at least.
Like I said, it’s still too early to panic, but it’s probably not too early to get irritated or annoyed.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Position Player Wrapup
So now that I've gone through the position players, it's time to close out what the outlook is on a team level. To do that I've built depth charts on offense and defense which we can use as a rough gauge,Offensively, there's little question that the Yankees are probably the most talented team in baseball. The one question that could impact that is the health of their regulars given their ages. Projections of single players are for the most part objective, but when we try to roll them up into a team-wide performance we will run into subjective issues with playing time, so keep that in mind.
This is my projected lineup for the Yankees this year. I am basing the playing time on their projected playing time with some downward adjustments for potential injuries. I am allocating total playing time based on expected outs by each player, with the assumption that the team will have 27 outs per game minus about 80 outs to account for ninth innings in home victories, so a total of 4294 outs. I didn't subtract more outs than that to account for extra innings.
The projections below are the average of five systems (CHONE, MARCEL, PECOTA, ZiPS and CAIRO). The last column (BR) is batting runs by linear weights. There are no position adjustments or comparisons to average in the batting runs calculated here, since I am looking for a total number.
| Starters | POS | AVG | OBP | SLG | PA | Outs | BR |
| Johnny Damon | LF | .280 | .353 | .423 | 585 | 379 | 78 |
| Derek Jeter | SS | .307 | .379 | .438 | 600 | 373 | 86 |
| Bobby Abreu | RF | .277 | .383 | .439 | 600 | 370 | 89 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | .300 | .406 | .574 | 650 | 386 | 123 |
| Jason Giambi | 1B | .245 | .387 | .474 | 300 | 184 | 46 |
| Jorge Posada | C | .286 | .380 | .469 | 500 | 310 | 76 |
| Hideki Matsui | DH | .287 | .367 | .477 | 500 | 316 | 74 |
| Robinson Cano | 2B | .308 | .348 | .482 | 585 | 381 | 84 |
| Melky Cabrera | CF | .282 | .344 | .406 | 550 | 361 | 68 |
| Starters Total | .289 | .372 | .465 | 4870 | 3060 | 724 |
I can't account for the event of catastrophic injury here, so I tried to spread the injury risk among everyone with the exception of Giambi, who I'm assuming will be restricted to around 300 plate appearances. Outs are just calculated as (1 - OBP) times PA.
Here's how the bench looks.
| Bench | POS | AVG | OBP | SLG | PA | Outs | BR |
| Wilson Betemit | 3B | .258 | .333 | .445 | 350 | 233 | 46 |
| Morgan Ensberg | 1B | .248 | .365 | .446 | 290 | 184 | 40 |
| Jose Molina | C | .243 | .280 | .360 | 250 | 180 | 23 |
| Shelley Duncan | 1B | .243 | .311 | .453 | 250 | 172 | 32 |
| Brett Gardner | OF | .253 | .325 | .327 | 150 | 101 | 15 |
| Alberto Gonzalez | SS | .253 | .301 | .348 | 140 | 98 | 13 |
| Nick Green | UT | .246 | .308 | .397 | 129 | 89 | 14 |
| Jason Lane | OF | .235 | .311 | .414 | 127 | 87 | 15 |
| Chris Woodward | UT | .234 | .294 | .339 | 125 | 88 | 11 |
| Bench Total | .247 | .312 | .404 | 1811 | 1234 | 209 |
I have no idea if any of Jason Lane, Nick Green or Chris Woodward will see any playing time but I figure they will be stashed at Scranton so there's at least some possibility of it. What should be obvious is that the Yankees have two potentially strong bench players in Betemit and Ensberg, who both project well enough to be starters at their respective positions. That helps mitigate any potential injuries in the infield with Betemit's ability to cover any position and with Ensberg presumably able to cover 3B and 1B.
Add it up, and here's what you get.
| Team Total | AVG | OBP | SLG | PA | Outs | BR |
| Starters + Bench | .277 | .355 | .448 | 6681 | 4294 | 933 |
The sigma on a team's runs scored in a season is around 30, so that puts the Yankees in a range of 903-963 runs scored this year on paper using the projections I'm using and the playing time assumptions I'm using.
Looking at baserunning using Lee Panas's bases gained above average, here's how the players that Lee had data for did last year:
| Player | Team | BGAA Hits | BGAA Ground | BGAA Air | BGAA Other | BGAA Total |
| Damon | NYA | 3.7 | 2.3 | 12.3 | 15.3 | 33.6 |
| Rodriguez | NYA | 11.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 11.1 | 28.1 |
| Abreu | NYA | 1.1 | 1.2 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 8.7 |
| Jeter | NYA | 9 | -3.6 | 1.3 | -3 | 3.7 |
| Matsui | NYA | 4.5 | 1.5 | -2.3 | -2.8 | 0.9 |
| Cabrera | NYA | 4.9 | 2.6 | -6.9 | -1.4 | -0.8 |
| Cano | NYA | 4.6 | 6 | -5.3 | -8.7 | -3.4 |
| Giambi | NYA | -9.1 | 0.5 | -1 | -0.6 | -10.3 |
| Posada | NYA | -7.5 | -5 | -5.1 | -0.6 | -18.2 |
| Ensberg | NYA | -6.3 | 2.8 | -2.4 | -0.2 | -6.1 |
| 16.7 | 11 | -1.2 | 9.8 | 36.2 |
A team total of 36 would be worth an additional 10 runs, but we should regress that towards average since we only have one year of data. Let's assume the Yankees will be about 5 runs better than average on the bases this year.
So we've got 933 runs at the plate and another 5 on the bases, but unfortunately, we're not quite done yet.
Projecting defense is tricky, but I'm going to take a stab at it anyway. Using zone rating projections and defensive depth charts, here's how that looks.
First up, the expected starters. A full season is about 1450 defensive innings.
| Starters | POS | Inn | Proj CH | Proj ZR | Proj PM | Avg ZR | Avg PM | PMAA | RSAA |
| Jason Giambi | 1B | 500 | 96 | .796 | 77 | .841 | 81 | -4 | -3 |
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 1300 | 479 | .833 | 399 | .823 | 394 | 5 | 4 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | 1300 | 392 | .758 | 298 | .761 | 298 | -1 | -1 |
| Derek Jeter | SS | 1300 | 487 | .806 | 392 | .825 | 402 | -9 | -7 |
| Johnny Damon | LF | 1000 | 257 | .869 | 223 | .862 | 222 | 2 | 1 |
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 1100 | 361 | .898 | 324 | .885 | 320 | 5 | 4 |
| Bobby Abreu | RF | 1300 | 325 | .864 | 280 | .868 | 282 | -1 | -1 |
| Total | 13050 | 2397 | 1993 | 1999 | -5 | -4 |
POS: Position
Inn: Defensive innings
Proj CH: Projected chances
Proj ZR: Projected zone rating
Proj PM: Projected plays made
Avg ZR: Average projected ZR at POS
Avg PM: Average plays made
PMAA: Plays made above average
RSAA: Runs saved above average
That looks like the best defensive team the Yankees have run out there in a while, with only Giambi and Jeter as big minuses. In Giambi's case he probably won't play enough to really hurt the team, and in Jeter's case the more he plays the more he bats so I guess it's not really all that bad.
Filling in the remaining innings with bench guys, here's what I get.
| Bench | POS | Inn | Proj CH | Proj ZR | Proj PM | Avg ZR | Avg PM | PMAA | RSAA |
| Wilson Betemit | 1B | 400 | 77 | .816 | 63 | .841 | 65 | -2 | -2 |
| Wilson Betemit | 2B | 80 | 29 | .813 | 24 | .823 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Wilson Betemit | 3B | 50 | 15 | .786 | 12 | .761 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Wilson Betemit | SS | 100 | 37 | .793 | 30 | .825 | 31 | -1 | -1 |
| Shelley Duncan | 1B | 100 | 19 | .834 | 16 | .841 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | LF | 50 | 13 | .871 | 11 | .862 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | RF | 50 | 12 | .875 | 11 | .868 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Lane | LF | 50 | 13 | .869 | 11 | .862 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Lane | CF | 200 | 66 | .833 | 55 | .885 | 58 | -3 | -3 |
| Jason Lane | RF | 100 | 25 | .828 | 21 | .868 | 22 | -1 | -1 |
| Morgan Ensberg | 1B | 450 | 87 | .816 | 71 | .841 | 73 | -2 | -2 |
| Morgan Ensberg | 3B | 90 | 27 | .791 | 21 | .761 | 21 | 1 | 1 |
| Nick Green | 2B | 40 | 15 | .804 | 12 | .823 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Green | SS | 40 | 15 | .825 | 12 | .825 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Woodward | 2B | 30 | 11 | .807 | 9 | .823 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Woodward | 3B | 10 | 3 | .846 | 3 | .761 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Woodward | SS | 10 | 4 | .842 | 3 | .825 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Hideki Matsui | LF | 350 | 90 | .833 | 75 | .862 | 78 | -3 | -2 |
| Johnny Damon | CF | 150 | 49 | .881 | 43 | .885 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
The Yankee bench may end up hitting pretty well for a bench, but they don't look to field particularly well.
Let's add in the catchers:
| Catchers | Inn | SB | CS | CS% | PBWPR | TER | FER | Tot R | R/140 |
| Posada | 1022 | 83 | 31 | 27% | -2 | 1 | 0 | -4 | -4 |
| Molina | 428 | 20 | 14 | 40% | -2 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -8 |
And let's then add it all up.
| Pos | Inn | Proj CH | Proj ZR | Proj PM | Avg ZR | Avg PM | PMAA | RS |
| 1B | 1450 | 279 | .810 | 226 | .841 | 235 | -9 | -7 |
| 2B | 1450 | 534 | .831 | 443 | .823 | 439 | 4 | 3 |
| 3B | 1450 | 438 | .762 | 333 | .761 | 333 | 1 | 0 |
| SS | 1450 | 543 | .806 | 438 | .825 | 448 | -10 | -8 |
| LF | 1450 | 373 | .860 | 321 | .862 | 321 | -1 | -1 |
| CF | 1450 | 476 | .887 | 423 | .885 | 422 | 1 | 1 |
| RF | 1450 | 362 | .862 | 312 | .868 | 314 | -2 | -2 |
| C | 1450 | -7 | ||||||
| Total | 11600 | 3005 | .831 | 2496 | .836 | 2513 | -17 | -13 |
So overall, the Yankees are projecting to be about 13 runs worse than an average team defensively, which seems bad but for them is pretty good considering some of the teams that they've run out there recently.
So what do all these dorky numbers really mean? The Yankee position players project to score about 938 runs and allow 13 runs more than an average team. According to my Diamond Mind projections which should be released sometime around March 24, the average non-Yankee AL team projects to score 786 runs and be average defensively (shocking, I realize).
938 - 13 - 786 = 139
So the Yankee position players project to be about 14 wins better than an average (81 win team). Now injury or a bigger decline than projected could certainly affect those numbers, but then again a meteor could hit earth and make it all moot too. 81 + 14 = 95 wins. The next question will be whether the pitching staff is going to be able to do their part, which I'll try and answer over the next couple of weeks.
Update: In case any one wants to mess around with different playing times, I've made a spreadsheet that you can use. You can download it here. You can change the players and plate appearances on offense, and on defense you can mess around with innings and positions.
For offense, the projected outs should = the expected outs, you'll have to adjust the plate appearances to get to that. On defense, defensive innings at a position should sum up to 1450.
Friday, March 7, 2008
Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Bench
We've gone through the likely starters for the 2008 Yankees, so now it's time to take a look at the guys on the bench. I won't look back at 2007 for these guys, I'll just look at what they project to do this year.Wilson Betemit
Scott Proctor and his tattered arm were shipped to Los Angeles of Los Angeles last season to acquire Betemit. Betemit's a fairly young player who was once a highly touted prospect in the Braves' farm system. Although he's a switch-hitter, he has exhibited a very significant platoon split in his career.
Vs RHP: .268/.347/.464 in 800 PA
Vs LHP: .232/.281/.353 in 227 PA
Now, 227 plate appearances aren't enough to give us a solid window of Betemit's actual skill vs LHP. The sigma on his OPS vs lefties is .149, so we can say we can estimate his true talent OPS against lefties to be somewhere in the range of .485 - .783. So it's tough to say that Betemit is really a platoon player just yet.
Here's how Betemit's 2008 projections look. I am comparing him to the average 3B here.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 368 | 331 | 46 | 84 | 17 | 1 | 14 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 89 | 1 | .254 | .329 | .438 | -1 | 9 |
| marcel | 383 | 338 | 47 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 51 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 89 | 1 | .266 | .339 | .453 | 2 | 12 |
| pecota | 265 | 234 | 31 | 60 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 69 | 1 | .255 | .331 | .437 | -1 | 6 |
| zips | 336 | 301 | 42 | 78 | 17 | 1 | 14 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 34 | 86 | 1 | .259 | .336 | .462 | 2 | 11 |
| cairo | 228 | 200 | 30 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 51 | 1 | .254 | .326 | .428 | -2 | 4 |
| average | 316 | 281 | 39 | 72 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 77 | 1 | .258 | .332 | .443 | 0 | 8 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 228 | 200 | 35 | 58 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 44 | 2 | .290 | .382 | .530 | 9 | 15 |
| 65% | 228 | 200 | 33 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 47 | 1 | .272 | .354 | .479 | 3 | 9 |
| Baseline | 228 | 200 | 30 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 51 | 1 | .254 | .326 | .428 | -2 | 4 |
| 35% | 228 | 200 | 27 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 54 | 0 | .236 | .298 | .377 | -7 | -1 |
| 20% | 228 | 200 | 24 | 44 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 58 | 0 | .219 | .270 | .326 | -13 | -7 |
Betemit projects to hit about as well as an average 3B. which is pretty damn good for a backup IF.
Defensively, Betemit could see some time at first base depending on how the great Giambi experiment pans out, or in the late innings for defense, but right now his primarily role will be backing up the entire infield. He's a good bat for an infielder, but reviews are mixed on his defense. The numbers aren't great, but we have the small sample size issue to contend with.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 1B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 14 | 9 | 74 | 67 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 18 | .778 | -1 | -1 | -18 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 77 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 10 | 9 | 69 | 26 | 20 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 22 | .773 | -1 | -1 | -15 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | .857 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | .000 | -2 | -1 | -291 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 22 | 7 | 4 | 39 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 1.000 | 2 | 1 | 47 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 63 | 46 | 431 | 26 | 94 | 6 | 6 | 103 | 124 | .831 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 30 | 20 | 204 | 8 | 40 | 3 | 9 | 41 | 51 | .804 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 2006 | NL | LA | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 49 | 45 | 398 | 24 | 83 | 4 | 9 | 83 | 109 | .761 | -3 | -2 | -7 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 14 | 5 | 56 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 19 | .789 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 53 | 39 | 353 | 20 | 60 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 86 | .721 | -4 | -4 | -15 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 22 | 11 | 7 | 75 | 12 | 30 | 3 | 5 | 29 | 35 | .829 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 25 | 10 | 136 | 24 | 40 | 1 | 10 | 36 | 48 | .750 | -4 | -3 | -36 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 18 | 10 | 92 | 20 | 33 | 5 | 10 | 27 | 40 | .675 | -6 | -5 | -75 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | SS | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 8 | 4 | 39 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | .889 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | SS | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Projection | 1B | 14 | 9 | 223 | 67 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 18 | .778 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Projection | 2B | 4 | 4 | 92 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | .791 | -2 | -2 | -27 | ||||
| Projection | 3B | 43 | 32 | 896 | 17 | 59 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 79 | .779 | -1 | 0 | -1 | ||||
| Projection | SS | 15 | 7 | 239 | 15 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 30 | .750 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
I debated including the defensive numbers for any of the bench candidates since there are sample size issues, but I'll present them with the caveat that there is not enough data to make any definitive assessment of what they may tell us. I'd say Betemit is a decent glove at third and first and probably a bit stretched in the middle infield although he can handle it. Betemit's a lock to be on the roster, and for good reason. He could very well be the best backup infielder in baseball.
Jose Molina
After the Wil Nieves Experience™ got to be too much, the Yankees picked up Molina mid-season from the hated Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for Jeff Kennard. Molina's not a good hitter, but that's why he's a backup catcher. Here are his projections for 2008, prepare to be underwhelmed.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 267 | 254 | 28 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 57 | 1 | .240 | .277 | .370 | -3 | 3 |
| marcel | 326 | 299 | 30 | 74 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 64 | 2 | .247 | .285 | .371 | -2 | 4 |
| pecota | 170 | 155 | 14 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 1 | .240 | .278 | .346 | -3 | 1 |
| zips | 203 | 194 | 17 | 47 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 44 | 1 | .242 | .276 | .340 | -4 | 1 |
| cairo | 222 | 203 | 21 | 49 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 1 | .242 | .281 | .362 | -2 | 2 |
| average | 238 | 221 | 22 | 54 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 49 | 1 | .242 | .279 | .358 | -3 | 2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 222 | 203 | 25 | 56 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 37 | 3 | .276 | .333 | .450 | 7 | 12 |
| 65% | 222 | 203 | 23 | 53 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 40 | 2 | .259 | .307 | .406 | 2 | 7 |
| Baseline | 222 | 203 | 21 | 49 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 1 | .242 | .281 | .362 | -2 | 2 |
| 35% | 222 | 203 | 18 | 46 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 47 | 1 | .224 | .254 | .318 | -7 | -3 |
| 20% | 222 | 203 | 16 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 50 | 0 | .207 | .228 | .274 | -12 | -7 |
Pray for Jorge Posada's continued good health, although to be fair Molina's defense might make him worthy of a roster spot.
| Year | Last | First | Tm | Lg | Inn | SB | CS | CS% | PBWPR | TER | FER | Tot R | R/140 |
| 2004 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 524 | 23 | 19 | 45% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 14 |
| 2005 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 480 | 19 | 18 | 49% | -3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 2006 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 603 | 27 | 19 | 41% | -5 | 0 | -2 | -4 | -8 |
| 2007 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 323 | 18 | 7 | 28% | 0 | -1 | 0 | -2 | -8 |
| 2007 | Molina | Jose | NYA | AL | 169 | 13 | 5 | 28% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Projection | Molina | Jose | NYA | AL | 428 | 20 | 14 | 40% | -2 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -8 |
Molina projects to be below average defensively, mainly due to a poor projection on passed balls and wild pitches. His throwing and error rate are about average. Maybe he can recover some of that 2004 defensive magic.
Although Francisco Cervelli has had a couple of promising seasons in the minors, Molina's probably got his spot on the bench locked up this year.
Morgan Ensberg
Ensberg is coming off a very disappointing season after hitting 59 HRs and walking 186 times combined over 2005 and 2006. His performance was attributed at least partially to a shoulder injury. If that was indeed the case and he is healthy now, he has a lot of upside as not just a bench player, but as a potential starting first baseman. Here's how Ensberg projects for 2008 as compared to an average 1B.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 420 | 356 | 54 | 86 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 82 | 3 | .242 | .357 | .419 | -3 | 8 |
| marcel | 412 | 346 | 56 | 87 | 17 | 1 | 17 | 54 | 3 | 3 | 59 | 81 | 3 | .251 | .362 | .454 | 1 | 12 |
| pecota | 277 | 229 | 38 | 57 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 38 | 2 | 1 | 42 | 57 | 2 | .249 | .367 | .457 | 2 | 9 |
| zips | 475 | 395 | 60 | 96 | 18 | 1 | 20 | 59 | 1 | 3 | 76 | 105 | 4 | .243 | .371 | .446 | 1 | 14 |
| cairo | 431 | 363 | 56 | 93 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 58 | 2 | 3 | 62 | 77 | 3 | .255 | .366 | .459 | 2 | 14 |
| average | 403 | 338 | 53 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 16 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 81 | 3 | .248 | .365 | .447 | 0 | 12 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 431 | 363 | 63 | 102 | 22 | 3 | 22 | 65 | 3 | 1 | 70 | 68 | 5 | .282 | .411 | .538 | 17 | 29 |
| 65% | 431 | 363 | 59 | 97 | 20 | 2 | 20 | 62 | 3 | 2 | 66 | 73 | 4 | .268 | .388 | .499 | 10 | 22 |
| Baseline | 431 | 363 | 56 | 93 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 58 | 2 | 3 | 62 | 77 | 3 | .255 | .366 | .459 | 2 | 14 |
| 35% | 431 | 363 | 52 | 88 | 16 | 1 | 16 | 54 | 1 | 4 | 58 | 82 | 2 | .242 | .344 | .419 | -6 | 6 |
| 20% | 431 | 363 | 48 | 83 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 50 | 1 | 5 | 54 | 86 | 1 | .229 | .321 | .379 | -14 | -2 |
Again, we don't know how healthy he is, but the projections are pretty encouraging and there is some upside here.
Also of note are Ensberg's career splits. Versus lefties he has hit .284/.406/.530 in his career over 686 PA, compared to .258/.350/.456 versus righties. Even in his down 2007 he hit .257/.345/.486 versus lefties.
Ensberg's primarily played 3B in his career, but I think he should be reasonably competent at first base because of that infield experience. Here are his career defensive numbers at 3B.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 27 | 43 | 37 | 328 | 28 | 76 | 8 | 5 | 80 | 110 | .727 | -5 | -4 | -16 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 27 | 111 | 89 | 818 | 77 | 184 | 9 | 18 | 195 | 248 | .786 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 28 | 118 | 103 | 921 | 80 | 164 | 13 | 23 | 180 | 243 | .741 | -7 | -6 | -9 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 29 | 148 | 147 | 1286 | 100 | 296 | 15 | 31 | 324 | 403 | .804 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 30 | 117 | 106 | 975 | 80 | 230 | 12 | 25 | 247 | 301 | .821 | 11 | 9 | 13 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 32 | 68 | 52 | 492 | 36 | 107 | 11 | 12 | 118 | 161 | .733 | -6 | -5 | -15 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 32 | 12 | 10 | 93 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 32 | .906 | 4 | 3 | 53 |
| 3B | 102 | 91 | 2474 | 67 | 183 | 11 | 20 | 198 | 252 | .786 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
I'd worry about how Ensberg may handle scooping throws, but other than that I think anyone that can play an average 3B should at the very least be average at 1B. Couple that with a bat that projects around average and with a tendency for lefty-mashing, and Ensberg seems like a good guy to have on the bench as well.
Shelley Duncan
The man, the myth, the legend. Duncan scuffled around the minors for most of his career until breaking through in 2007 and getting a shot at the majors as a 27 year old rookie. Duncan slammed 7 HRs in 74 MLB at bats and ended the season with a line of .257/.329/.554. Duncan's projections for 2008 aren't very good because of his lackluster performance in the minors before 2007.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 465 | 425 | 58 | 98 | 19 | 1 | 21 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 36 | 113 | 4 | .231 | .297 | .428 | -11 | 2 |
| marcel | 242 | 215 | 35 | 58 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 45 | 2 | .270 | .339 | .465 | 0 | 7 |
| pecota | 460 | 412 | 51 | 98 | 19 | 1 | 21 | 70 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 112 | 4 | .239 | .308 | .439 | -7 | 5 |
| zips | 446 | 405 | 45 | 98 | 18 | 1 | 24 | 74 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 103 | 3 | .242 | .312 | .469 | -4 | 9 |
| cairo | 369 | 334 | 44 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 77 | 2 | .250 | .316 | .477 | -2 | 9 |
| average | 396 | 358 | 48 | 88 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 59 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 88 | 3 | .246 | .314 | .456 | -4 | 7 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 369 | 334 | 51 | 93 | 20 | 2 | 24 | 66 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 69 | 4 | .278 | .360 | .560 | 12 | 23 |
| 65% | 369 | 334 | 47 | 88 | 18 | 1 | 22 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 73 | 3 | .264 | .338 | .518 | 5 | 16 |
| Baseline | 369 | 334 | 44 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 77 | 2 | .250 | .316 | .477 | -2 | 9 |
| 35% | 369 | 334 | 41 | 79 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 82 | 2 | .236 | .294 | .435 | -9 | 2 |
| 20% | 369 | 334 | 37 | 74 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 51 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 86 | 1 | .223 | .272 | .393 | -16 | -5 |
I think Duncan may be better than what those numbers show because I think he made some adjustments in his game that allowed him to play like he did in 2007. I can see him as a .250/.320/.480 type hitter with HR power, and that's a damn fine bench player.
Defensively, we don't have much data on Duncan, but the scouting reports see him as a below average defender at either first base or the OF corners.
Jason Lane
Lane's a long-shot to make the roster. He's a similar player to Shelley Duncan, but 3 years older and with a couple of bad seasons in his recent past (.201/.318/.392 in 2006 and .175/.254/.345 in 2007). Despite being a righty he doesn't have a huge platoon split (.768 OPS vs RPH, .779 vs LHP). His projections for 2008, as you may imagine, are a little ugly.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 407 | 363 | 48 | 87 | 18 | 1 | 14 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 40 | 74 | 4 | .240 | .322 | .410 | -8 | 3 |
| marcel | 332 | 294 | 39 | 68 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 44 | 3 | 2 | 30 | 63 | 3 | .231 | .304 | .418 | -7 | 2 |
| pecota | 321 | 285 | 35 | 66 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 43 | 4 | 1 | 28 | 61 | 3 | .232 | .302 | .404 | -8 | 1 |
| zips | 434 | 391 | 46 | 90 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 56 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 88 | 5 | .230 | .306 | .402 | -11 | 1 |
| cairo | 342 | 302 | 39 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 3 | .245 | .319 | .434 | -4 | 5 |
| average | 367 | 327 | 41 | 77 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 47 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 69 | 4 | .236 | .311 | .413 | -8 | 2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 342 | 302 | 45 | 83 | 20 | 2 | 17 | 53 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 54 | 5 | .274 | .365 | .518 | 9 | 18 |
| 65% | 342 | 302 | 42 | 78 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 49 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 58 | 4 | .259 | .342 | .476 | 2 | 12 |
| Baseline | 342 | 302 | 39 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 3 | .245 | .319 | .434 | -4 | 5 |
| 35% | 342 | 302 | 36 | 70 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 43 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 66 | 2 | .231 | .295 | .392 | -11 | -2 |
| 20% | 342 | 302 | 33 | 65 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 39 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 70 | 1 | .217 | .272 | .350 | -18 | -9 |
Defensively, Lane does have the ability to play CF which Duncan does not. However, he doesn't grade well defensively if you believe zone rating.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | 1B | Jason Lane | 27 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | 1B | Jason Lane | 29 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 26 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 53 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 26 | 6 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .500 | -1 | -1 | -78 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 27 | 17 | 3 | 49 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 | .700 | -2 | -1 | -39 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 28 | 6 | 4 | 37 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 13 | .846 | 0 | 0 | -13 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 29 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | .833 | 0 | 0 | -15 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 31 | 36 | 27 | 261 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 88 | .875 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | CF | Jason Lane | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 137 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 26 | 11 | 1 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 28 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 26 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 27 | 35 | 6 | 102 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 24 | .917 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 28 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | .429 | -3 | -3 | -153 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 29 | 6 | 1 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 43 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 31 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 26 | 27 | 16 | 151 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 49 | .796 | -4 | -4 | -35 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 26 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 27 | 24 | 13 | 141 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 31 | .871 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 28 | 137 | 126 | 1116 | 225 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 203 | 248 | .819 | -13 | -11 | -14 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 29 | 89 | 73 | 679 | 155 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 183 | .814 | -11 | -9 | -19 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 31 | 18 | 15 | 128 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 47 | .851 | -1 | -1 | -13 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | RF | Jason Lane | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 32 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | CF | 32 | 16 | 9 | 285 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 31 | .859 | -4 | -3 | -17 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | LF | 32 | 9 | 2 | 86 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | .843 | -4 | -4 | -62 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | RF | 32 | 57 | 48 | 1314 | 98 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 91 | 111 | .823 | -6 | -5 | -5 |
I'd have a tough time building a case for Lane over Ensberg or Duncan, unless the Yankees need an OF more than they need a backup corner IF.
Nick Green
The triumphant return of a Yankee legend. Green's the prototypical utility player. He projects to be bad on offense.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 388 | 358 | 43 | 85 | 16 | 2 | 12 | 44 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 101 | 5 | .237 | .296 | .394 | -9 | 1 |
| marcel | 216 | 189 | 27 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 49 | 4 | .238 | .315 | .360 | -5 | 0 |
| pecota | 457 | 410 | 47 | 97 | 21 | 2 | 12 | 51 | 6 | 4 | 34 | 129 | 6 | .237 | .300 | .385 | -10 | 1 |
| zips | 370 | 341 | 36 | 88 | 17 | 2 | 11 | 38 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 90 | 4 | .258 | .316 | .416 | -4 | 6 |
| cairo | 265 | 237 | 30 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 57 | 4 | .266 | .321 | .418 | -2 | 5 |
| average | 339 | 306 | 37 | 76 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 83 | 5 | .247 | .310 | .395 | -6 | 3 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 265 | 237 | 35 | 71 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 49 | 6 | .299 | .374 | .511 | 10 | 16 |
| 65% | 265 | 237 | 33 | 67 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 53 | 5 | .283 | .348 | .464 | 4 | 10 |
| Baseline | 265 | 237 | 30 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 57 | 4 | .266 | .321 | .418 | -2 | 5 |
| 35% | 265 | 237 | 27 | 59 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 61 | 3 | .249 | .294 | .371 | -8 | -1 |
| 20% | 265 | 237 | 24 | 55 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 65 | 2 | .232 | .267 | .325 | -14 | -7 |
He can play pretty much any infield position, although not necessarily all that well.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 1B | Nick Green | 27 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 194 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 2B | Nick Green | 25 | 75 | 61 | 572 | 137 | 203 | 8 | 44 | 187 | 222 | .842 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 2005 | AL | TB | 2B | Nick Green | 26 | 91 | 83 | 731 | 141 | 195 | 4 | 44 | 186 | 240 | .775 | -11 | -8 | -16 |
| 2006 | AL | TB | 2B | Nick Green | 27 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | .778 | 0 | 0 | -14 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 2B | Nick Green | 27 | 19 | 11 | 103 | 37 | 29 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 35 | .743 | -3 | -2 | -30 |
| 2007 | AL | Sea | 2B | Nick Green | 29 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 3B | Nick Green | 25 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | AL | TB | 3B | Nick Green | 26 | 13 | 11 | 104 | 4 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 30 | .767 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 3B | Nick Green | 27 | 17 | 8 | 80 | 7 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 27 | .704 | -2 | -1 | -25 |
| 2006 | AL | TB | SS | Nick Green | 27 | 10 | 7 | 67 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 28 | .786 | -1 | -1 | -17 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | SS | Nick Green | 27 | 10 | 3 | 35 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 15 | .733 | -1 | -1 | -42 |
| 2007 | AL | Sea | SS | Nick Green | 29 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 65 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 2B | 38 | 32 | 853 | 63 | 85 | 2 | 19 | 79 | 99 | .799 | -2 | -2 | -3 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 3B | 13 | 7 | 213 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 22 | .739 | -1 | 0 | -3 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | SS | 6 | 3 | 86 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 | .795 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
Green is probably the best choice if the Yankees decide they want a second backup middle infielder, although if they carry 12 pitchers that may make it tough to squeeze him on.
Chris Woodward
Take Nick Green and make him worse and make him a few years older and you have Chris Woodward.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 242 | 222 | 23 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 51 | 1 | .234 | .298 | .333 | -9 | -3 |
| marcel | 301 | 268 | 32 | 64 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 61 | 2 | .239 | .299 | .351 | -10 | -2 |
| pecota | 84 | 75 | 8 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1 | .240 | .310 | .333 | -3 | 0 |
| zips | 179 | 165 | 18 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 40 | 1 | .224 | .285 | .321 | -8 | -3 |
| cairo | 238 | 212 | 23 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 48 | 1 | .231 | .286 | .330 | -10 | -4 |
| average | 209 | 188 | 21 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 43 | 1 | .234 | .295 | .334 | -8 | -2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 238 | 212 | 28 | 56 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 41 | 2 | .264 | .337 | .412 | 0 | 6 |
| 65% | 238 | 212 | 25 | 53 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 45 | 2 | .248 | .311 | .371 | -5 | 1 |
| Baseline | 238 | 212 | 23 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 48 | 1 | .231 | .286 | .330 | -10 | -4 |
| 35% | 238 | 212 | 21 | 46 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 51 | 1 | .215 | .260 | .289 | -14 | -8 |
| 20% | 238 | 212 | 18 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 55 | 0 | .198 | .234 | .248 | -19 | -13 |
Woodward has seen some spot duty in the OF which could theoretically give him an edge on Green.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 1B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 1B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 34 | 21 | 199 | 206 | 10 | 2 | 16 | 30 | 33 | .909 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 1B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 1B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 6 | 4 | 35 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | .875 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 2B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 6 | 3 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 13 | .846 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 2B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 | .700 | -1 | -1 | -41 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 2B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 39 | 33 | 292 | 72 | 93 | 4 | 20 | 76 | 91 | .835 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 2B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 11 | 6 | 54 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 23 | .652 | -4 | -3 | -70 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 3B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 121 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 3B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 6 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | .923 | 2 | 1 | 79 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 3B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 11 | 6 | 66 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 16 | 1.000 | 3 | 3 | 60 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 3B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 24 | 6 | 100 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 16 | .813 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 26 | 79 | 77 | 678 | 134 | 231 | 13 | 64 | 208 | 240 | .867 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 2003 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 27 | 103 | 98 | 871 | 161 | 300 | 17 | 69 | 279 | 335 | .833 | -3 | -3 | -4 |
| 2004 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 28 | 64 | 60 | 515 | 87 | 171 | 5 | 42 | 163 | 195 | .836 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | SS | Chris Woodward | 29 | 7 | 3 | 33 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | .857 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | SS | Chris Woodward | 30 | 13 | 11 | 97 | 13 | 33 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 35 | .829 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | SS | Chris Woodward | 31 | 13 | 5 | 67 | 7 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 20 | .850 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 11 | 7 | 192 | 63 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 11 | .901 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 2B | 18 | 14 | 362 | 29 | 38 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 40 | .788 | -1 | -1 | -4 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 3B | 14 | 5 | 196 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 15 | .905 | 2 | 2 | 12 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | SS | 31 | 26 | 712 | 40 | 79 | 4 | 20 | 73 | 87 | .839 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Woodward brings a slightly better glove than Green it would appear, but a worse bat. He's probably not a good bet to make the team although I have a hunch he could sneak his way on with a hot spring.
Brett Gardner
Gardner's a long shot to start the season in the Bronx. He's shown pretty good OBP skills in the minors and he's supposed to be top of the scouting scale fast, but he has no power at all which is not a good sign for his major league future.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 469 | 427 | 55 | 108 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 35 | 9 | 40 | 91 | 2 | .253 | .320 | .328 | -13 | -1 |
| marcel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 |
| pecota | 483 | 428 | 58 | 102 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 31 | 25 | 7 | 44 | 100 | 3 | .238 | .308 | .318 | -18 | -5 |
| zips | 468 | 417 | 73 | 112 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 28 | 9 | 49 | 87 | 2 | .269 | .348 | .331 | -10 | 2 |
| cairo | 325 | 292 | 46 | 74 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 61 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .342 | -9 | -1 |
| average | 349 | 313 | 43 | 79 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 19 | 5 | 33 | 68 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .330 | -10 | -1 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 325 | 292 | 53 | 83 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 35 | 53 | 3 | .283 | .374 | .413 | 3 | 11 |
| 65% | 325 | 292 | 50 | 78 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 33 | 57 | 3 | .268 | .350 | .378 | -3 | 5 |
| Baseline | 325 | 292 | 46 | 74 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 61 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .342 | -9 | -1 |
| 35% | 325 | 292 | 43 | 70 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 4 | 27 | 65 | 1 | .239 | .302 | .307 | -16 | -7 |
| 20% | 325 | 292 | 39 | 65 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 25 | 69 | 1 | .224 | .278 | .272 | -22 | -13 |
Gardner's defense is apparently not as good as it should be with his speed because of some questionable reads, but I think he's still likely to be a plus defender.
Conclusion
We can probably assume the Yankees start the season with this lineup:
LF - Damon
SS - Jeter
RF - Abreu
3B - Rodriguez
1B - Giambi
C - Posada
DH - Matsui
2B - Cano
CF - Cabrera
We can probably also safely assume that they'll start the season with a 12 man pitching staff, which leaves four roster spots for the bench. Betemit and Molina are locks. I think Ensberg is pretty close to a lock as well, which leaves one spot for Jason Lane or Shelley Duncan or Nick Green or Chris Woodward. Duncan gives them the better bat, although Green and Woodward give them more infield flexibility. Lane is probably the best OF backup defensively since he can play CF, but he seems like the odd man out. If it was me I'd go with Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. Any situation that would require Green or Duncan could be handled without them. If you lose Alex Rodriguez, Ensberg or Betemit can play third. If you lose one of Jeter or Cano, Betemit can cover them. If you lose both Jeter and Cano, Betemit slides to second, Rodriguez to short, and Ensberg to third. If it's a long-term issue the Yankees would have Alberto Gonzalez available to backup around the IF.
The Yankees have similar OF flexibility with Damon as the backup CF, Matsui as the backup corner OF and emergency CF, and Duncan as a fifth OF who can cover the corners in a pinch.
I suppose a pinch runner for Giambi or Posada would be nice, but is that worth a roster spot? If it is I could see Gardner or Justin Christian sneaking on.
I'll take a look at what the Yankee position players add up to as far as runs and wins in my next entry and then it's on to the pitching.
So, like I said, my bench would be Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. There's a possibility Hideki Matsui may start the year on the DL which would open up another spot, but let's assume that's not the case for now. If you could take four players for the Yankee bench, who would they be?
Sunday, November 18, 2007
CAIRO vs. CHONE - 2008 Yankees edition
While we all wait breathlessly for Mariano Rivera to sign his contract, I noticed that Sean Smith posted his CHONE hitter projections over at his blog. I'm still messing around with my own CAIRO projections so I thought it'd be a good exercise for me to compare what the two say for the Yankees since it now appears the offense is basically set for 2008.And here's what that looks like:
| CAIRO | CHONE | |||||||||||
| Starters | POS | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | ||
| Johnny Damon | LF | 600 | .286 | .357 | .438 | 83 | .275 | .351 | .413 | 78 | ||
| Derek Jeter | SS | 600 | .318 | .388 | .463 | 92 | .299 | .373 | .433 | 84 | ||
| Bobby Abreu | RF | 600 | .284 | .392 | .461 | 94 | .268 | .375 | .422 | 84 | ||
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | 600 | .300 | .402 | .569 | 112 | .303 | .420 | .588 | 117 | ||
| Hideki Matsui | DH | 600 | .291 | .370 | .489 | 92 | .282 | .365 | .473 | 88 | ||
| Jorge Posada | C | 600 | .293 | .392 | .499 | 98 | .285 | .389 | .475 | 93 | ||
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 600 | .312 | .347 | .489 | 87 | .305 | .347 | .479 | 86 | ||
| Wilson Betemit | 1B | 400 | .265 | .338 | .443 | 52 | .254 | .329 | .438 | 51 | ||
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 600 | .281 | .341 | .403 | 72 | .278 | .342 | .397 | 72 | ||
| Starters Total | 5200 | .293 | .371 | .474 | 783 | .284 | .367 | .457 | 754 | |||
| Bench | POS | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | ||
| Jason Giambi | DH | 350 | .256 | .399 | .499 | 57 | .246 | .392 | .474 | 55 | ||
| Shelley Duncan | 1B | 325 | .257 | .322 | .480 | 44 | .235 | .301 | .452 | 40 | ||
| Jose Molina | C | 225 | .250 | .287 | .375 | 22 | .241 | .281 | .360 | 20 | ||
| Alberto Gonzalez | SS | 175 | .250 | .300 | .351 | 16 | .247 | .295 | .335 | 15 | ||
| Bronson Sardinha | RF | 150 | .230 | .293 | .376 | 15 | .240 | .305 | .388 | 16 | ||
| Brett Gardner | CF | 100 | .262 | .333 | .357 | 11 | .253 | .320 | .328 | 10 | ||
| Bench Total | 1325 | .251 | .331 | .427 | 166 | .243 | .323 | .408 | 157 | |||
| AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR | |||||
| Team Total | 6525 | .284 | .363 | .464 | 949 | .276 | .358 | .447 | 911 |
BR is batting runs using linear weights. I used the same amount of projected playing time for every single player and assumed 6525 plate appearances (last year's team had about 6550). I also factored in about 20% bench playing time.
What this data shows is that CAIRO is a lot more optimistic than CHONE, to the tune of a 38 run overall difference. My guess is that Sean is using a harsher aging factor than I am or regressing more towards the mean, or perhaps a combination of the two. The difference isn't huge on a player by player basis, but it's fairly significant overall.
Dan Szymborski's ZiPS for the Yankees are up too but since he doesn't have them in a spreadsheet yet I didn't look at how CAIRO compares yet. I'd guess ZiPS will be harsher than CHONE, but I feel pretty comfortable that the Yankees will score 900+ runs next season.
I've also updated the RLYW Lineup Toy with the CHONE projection data.
My posting may be sporadic over the next week or so as I'm heading on vacation but hopefully someone will fill in.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
2007 ALDS: Yankee Run Values
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | BRAA | DRAA | TRAA |
| R Cano | 16 | .333 | .375 | .800 | 1.175 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| S Duncan | 4 | .500 | .500 | .500 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A Rodriguez | 17 | .267 | .353 | .467 | .820 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M Cabrera | 16 | .188 | .188 | .375 | .563 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
| B Sardinha | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| J Damon | 19 | .278 | .316 | .611 | .927 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| H Matsui | 16 | .182 | .438 | .182 | .620 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| J Giambi | 4 | .250 | .250 | .250 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D Mientkiewicz | 8 | .000 | .143 | .000 | .143 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| J Posada | 17 | .133 | .235 | .200 | .435 | -2 | 0 | -2 |
| B Abreu | 17 | .267 | .353 | .533 | .886 | 1 | -4 | -3 |
| D Jeter | 17 | .176 | .176 | .176 | .352 | -2 | -1 | -3 |
BRAA: Batting runs above average by linear weights
DRAA: Defensive runs saved above average by linear weights
TRAA: BRAA + DRAA
| Player | IP | H | HR | BB | SO | RA | ERA | RSAA |
| A Pettitte | 6.3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| M Rivera | 4.7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| P Hughes | 5.7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 2 |
| K Farnsworth | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| M Mussina | 4.7 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3.86 | 3.86 | 1 |
| J Veras | 0.7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| R Villone | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
| J Chamberlain | 3.7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4.91 | 4.91 | 0 |
| L Vizcaino | 0.7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13.50 | 13.50 | -1 |
| R Clemens | 2.3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11.57 | 11.57 | -2 |
| R Ohlendorf | 1.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 27.00 | 27.00 | -2 |
| C Wang | 5.7 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 19.06 | 19.06 | -9 |
RSAA: Runs saved above average
| Player | TRAA |
| A Pettitte | 3 |
| M Rivera | 3 |
| P Hughes | 2 |
| R Cano | 1 |
| K Farnsworth | 1 |
| M Mussina | 1 |
| J Veras | 0 |
| S Duncan | 0 |
| A Rodriguez | 0 |
| R Villone | 0 |
| M Cabrera | 0 |
| B Sardinha | 0 |
| J Chamberlain | 0 |
| J Damon | 0 |
| H Matsui | 0 |
| J Giambi | 0 |
| L Vizcaino | -1 |
| D Mientkiewicz | -1 |
| J Posada | -2 |
| R Clemens | -2 |
| R Ohlendorf | -2 |
| B Abreu | -3 |
| D Jeter | -3 |
| C Wang | -9 |
| Total | -13 |
TRAA: TRAA/RSAA
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Picking the 2007 Postseason Roster
Now that the Yankees are officially in the playoffs, I can finally talk about the postseason roster. With the injuries to Carl Pavano, Darrell Rasner, Humberto Sanchez, and Andy Phillips, the Yankees basically have the flexibility to use anyone they want from their 40 man roster. Here’s a look at the candidates, with the players on the bubble separated out.
Starting Pitchers(4)
Andy Pettitte
Roger Clemens
Chien-Ming Wang
Mike Mussina
Relief Pitchers(5)
Mariano Rivera
Joba Chamberlain
Phil Hughes
Kyle Farnsworth
Luis Vizcaino
On the Bubble
Chris Britton
Brian Bruney
Tyler Clippard
Matt DeSalvo
Chase Wright
Jose Veras
Ron Villone
Sean Henn
Kei Igawa
Jeff Karstens
Ian Kennedy
Ross Ohlendorf
Edwar Ramirez
Catchers(2)
Jose Molina
Jorge Posada
Infielders(5)
Robinson Cano
Derek Jeter
Doug Mientkiewicz
Alex Rodriguez
Wilson Betemit
On the Bubble
Alberto Gonzalez
Outfielders (5)
Bobby Abreu
Melky Cabrera
Johnny Damon
Shelley Duncan
Hideki Matsui
On the Bubble
Bronson Sardinha
Designated Hitters(1)
Jason Giambi
There are 22 players I consider locks to make the roster, four starting pitchers, five relievers, two catchers, five infielders, five outfielders, and one DH. That gives the Yanks three slots to fill. If it were up to me, I’d take two more pitchers and one position player.
The position player seems like an easy choice to me, if choosing between Alberto Gonzalez or Bronson Sardinha I’d take the more valuable defensive player. Either can pinch-run, but Gonzalez gives the Yankees a little more depth in case of multiple injuries to their starting infielders.
The pitching situation is a little less clear-cut. Phil Hughes slots in as a long reliever, but the rest of the choices are mainly short relievers and that’s a concern with a gimpy Roger Clemens and Mike “Box of Chocolates” Mussina taking two starts. Because of this, one of the extra relievers should probably be someone who can pitch multiple innings. Out of the players on the bubble, the best choices for that kind of role in my mind are Kei Igawa or Ron Villone. Neither inspires much confidence, but we have to remember that you don’t have to win every single game in the playoffs, you just have to win 3 or 4 before your opponent does. If Clemens can’t go past the second inning, odds are the game is lost but you don’t want to have to burn out your bullpen either. The off days built into the schedule mitigate that to some degree. The other thing the Yankees should do is break up Pettitte and Wang. Since they’ll be starting on the road, I’d start Pettitte in game one, Clemens in game two, and Wang in game three at home. However, to be safe I think the Yankees should take Igawa. I know he hasn’t been good this year, but he could come into a game in the early innings and pitch 5 or 6 innings and put the Yankees in a position to win the next game. Now all the readers can proceed to tell me I’m insane.
That leaves one other pitcher to take. Ian Kennedy’s hurt so scratch him. Realistically it comes down to taking one of Chris Britton, Brian Bruney, Jose Veras, Villone, Ross Ohlendorf or Edwar Ramirez.
Britton - had success in the AL East last year and did well in AAA this season. For whatever reason he doesn’t seem to be well-regarded by the organization right now, and his stuff isn’t really that great for a short reliever.
Bruney - You know the deal with this guy. Great fastball, horrendous command.
Veras - See Bruney, although with a slightly better breaking pitch. I swear I have not seen Veras hit the catcher’s target on a single pitch yet this season.
Villone - Chock full of veterany-goodness. Hasn’t been horrible this year, but his control scares the hell out of me and he has a very high likelihood to implode in any given outing.
Ohlendorf - He’s looked pretty good so far in the majors, but it’s only been three innings. He’s got good stuff but his minor league numbers are pretty bad, but he was injured for much of the year and converted from a starter to a reliever so that should be considered.
Ramirez - I was pulling like hell for Edwar to come up the majors and succeed, but he still needs to work on his approach IMO. Until he can consistently get ahead in the count and make optimal use of his killer changeup, I wouldn’t have any faith in him in a tight spot. He does have strikeout ability (29 Ks in 19.3 innings), but he also has giving up HR ability (6 in 19.3 innings). He’s probably pitched himself off the postseason roster at this point.
Not a very inspiring bunch. I’d imagine we’ll get a healthy dose of all of these guys over the last four games of the year to see if one becomes a hot hand. I find Ohlendorf the most intriguing of this group, so he’d probably be my pick.
I’d like to see what other people would do instead of me, so let’s hear it…
Saturday, August 18, 2007
Lineup Permutations
With Jason Giambi back in the fold, the Yankees have a problem now. It's not a bad problem, because having more talent than you have spots for is a good thing. The key will be using the talent on hand in the way that is most likely to help you win games.This is not as clear-cut as the numbers that will follow may make it seem, because you're dealing with egos, over/under performances, possible injuries and fatigue, and many other factors(base clogging, chemistry of the lineup,etc.,). However, since I don't have any way to quantify any of that, I'm just going to look at the data that is available to me and see how the different options shake out.
For offense, I'm using a runs created formula that multiplies OBP times SLG times .92. This is then multiplied by 4.4 PA per player, which is the average PA per game for the Yankees's lineup. This doesn't consider lineup order. OBP and SLG are 2/3 based on the players' projections coming into 2007 and 1/3 based on their YTD performance. For Shelley Duncan I've included his MLEs so his stats aren't skewed by his small sample size MLB performance to this point. Since no one projected Duncan coming into the season, here's the projection I used for him:
| Year | Team | Last | First | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | K | BA | OBP | SLG |
| 2005 | Trenton | Duncan | Shelley | 142 | 521 | 76 | 113 | 23 | 1 | 27 | 71 | 43 | 147 | .216 | .277 | .422 |
| 2006 | Tre-Col | Duncan | Shelley | 104 | 384 | 43 | 88 | 21 | 0 | 18 | 51 | 31 | 91 | .230 | .287 | .426 |
| 2007 | Scranton | Duncan | Shelley | 91 | 325 | 53 | 88 | 17 | 1 | 23 | 66 | 38 | 88 | .271 | .350 | .537 |
| 2007 | Yankees | Duncan | Shelley | 17 | 42 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 5 | 12 | .310 | .383 | .738 |
| Projection | 109 | 416 | 59 | 106 | 26 | 1 | 25 | 67 | 43 | 109 | .255 | .325 | .501 |
I just figured out my own versions of Duncan's MLEs (major league equivalencies) then weighed each season to get a .325 OBP and .501 SLG, which doesn't seem out of line.
For defense, I'm using a combination of career defense as rated by zone rating combined with YTD 2007 performance as far as runs saved per game. For players with small sample size I made some assumptions based on scouting reports and my visual observations. I realize this turns what is supposed to be an objective exercise into a somewhat subjective one, but I think that the logic I used here is at least somewhat sound.
So the numbers that follow are the overall runs created on offense and the runs saved above/below average on defense for a single game. Multiply by 162 if you want to see how that translates to a full season.
Let's first look at the lineup that had become the basic lineup of choice prior to Giambi's return.
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Phillips | .537 | .037 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Matsui | .741 | -.062 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Damon | .620 | .000 |
| Off | 5.469 | -.015 | |
| Over 162 | 886 | -2 | |
| Per Game | 5.454 |
We'd expect this lineup to score 5.469 runs per game using the runs created formula I'm using assuming 40 plate appearances per game. We'd expect them to be .015 runs below average defensively per game. So net, offense plus defense this lineup is worth 5.454 runs per games. Over a full season, we'd expect them to score around 886 runs and be around 2 runs above average on defense. Bear in mind that Melky's projection coming into the year was a little a low and that his YTD performance would be worth .684 RC for ever 4.4 plate appearances. If we swap that out with his .575 combined projection you get an extra 17 runs over a full season. However, as much as I'd like to that, that's not objective analysis, so the projection stays as is with the understanding that it's possibly not indicative of a likely change in Melky's talent level (or a decline by Damon which makes him worse than projected).
So, let's look at a few other combinations.
First up, let's just swap out Damon for Giambi.
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Phillips | .537 | .037 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Matsui | .741 | -.062 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Giambi | .818 | .000 |
| Off | 5.668 | -.015 | |
| Over 162 | 918 | -2 | |
| Total | 5.653 |
No impact on the defense obviously, but over a full season it'd be about a 30 run upgrade on offense.
How about Damon at first and Giambi at DH? To make this work I assumed that Damon would be a slightly below average defensive 1B, but not too bad of one. I have no idea if that's a reasonable assumption or not.
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Damon | .620 | -.006 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Matsui | .741 | -.062 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Giambi | .818 | .000 |
| Off | 5.751 | -.059 | |
| Over 162 | 932 | -10 | |
| Total | 5.692 |
It's too bad this isn't a realistic option, because it's better than the first two. Unfortunately, it likely isn't or we'd have seen it already.
We also have to consider Wilson Betemit and Shelley Duncan in the mix. How about Duncan at first and Giambi at DH?
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Duncan | .659 | -.059 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Damon | .620 | -.003 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Giambi | .818 | .000 |
| Off | 5.668 | -.052 | |
| Over 162 | 918 | -8 | |
| Total | 5.616 |
We don't have enough data to have a good read on Duncan's defense at first although the consensus is it's not good, so I gave him a rating equivalent to a -10 over a full season.
Another option is, Betemit at first, Giambi still at DH.
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Betemit | .612 | -.006 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Matsui | .741 | -.062 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Giambi | .818 | .000 |
| Off | 5.743 | -.059 | |
| Over 162 | 930 | -10 | |
| Total | 5.684 |
We have a winner. According to these numbers, this is the best combination the Yankees can run out there if Damon at first is not an option, at least against righties. The nice thing is that since Betemit doesn't hit lefties they could use Duncan against lefties. I'd also assume that Betemit is a better defender at first base than Duncan, although without enough data to know I made him touch below average for this exercise.
The Yankees can also use Duncan in the OF corners although he's supposedly going to be pretty bad out there.
The best defensive team is probably the one below.
| Pos | Player | RC | Def |
| 1B | Phillips | .537 | .037 |
| 2B | Cano | .686 | .077 |
| 3B | Rodriguez | .900 | .073 |
| SS | Jeter | .721 | -.164 |
| LF | Damon | .620 | -.003 |
| CF | Cabrera | .588 | .042 |
| RF | Abreu | .677 | -.018 |
| DH | Giambi | .818 | .000 |
| Off | 5.547 | .044 | |
| Over 162 | 899 | 7 | |
| Total | 5.591 |
For all the crap Andy Phillips has been getting lately, offense plus defense he's not really that big of a problem.
There are way too many potential combinations for me to run through in this space, so I've uploaded the spreadsheet that I used for this if you want to play around with it yourselves. Just select a player's name and you'll get a pulldown which lets you change the player and their values will fill in automatically.
There are 39 games left in the season. I'd try to use the Duncan/Betemit platoon at first in at least half of them. I'd use Damon to rest Melky, Abreu, and Matsui once a week, and I'd save Andy Phillips for late inning defense. The nice thing about the current Yankee bench is they can rest almost anyone on the team without losing a ton of value. It seems to me that the main thing the Yankees have to avoid is starting Phillips at first base on the same day they start Damon at DH. If they avoid that, they'll be putting a pretty strong lineup out there no matter what combination they use. Except for House Money day of course.
Page 1 of 1 pages:








































