The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Tuesday, December 1, 2009

2009 Yankees Season in Review: Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the Defense

As requested, here’s a look at how Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the overall team defense did compared to their projections.

After a 2008 season that saw him get to AA, Cervelli was still probably off the radar for 2009 despite a brief cameo at the end of 2008. However, injuries forced him into the picture, and he ended up getting 101 PAs. Here are his projections entering 2009, pro-rated to those 101 PAs.

francisco cervelli PA AB H 2B 3B HR SB CS BB SO AVG OBP SLG BR/650 wOBA -2 Std -1 Std +1 Std +2 Std %
2009 chone projection 101 92 20 4 1 1 1 0 8 25 .223 .296 .304 53 .268 .174 .221 .315 .362 95.3%
2009 marcel projection 101 90 25 5 1 3 2 1 9 18 .272 .337 .422 82 .321 .221 .271 .370 .420 114.2%
2009 pecota projection 101 90 21 5 0 1 1 0 8 24 .229 .300 .335 60 .277 .182 .229 .324 .372 98.5%
2009 tht projection 101 91 21 5 0 1 1 0 8 18 .236 .315 .321 59 .284 .188 .236 .332 .380 101.1%
2009 zips projection 101 90 21 4 0 1 1 1 7 18 .236 .317 .304 56 .281 .186 .234 .329 .377 100.2%
2009 cairo projection 101 91 22 5 0 1 0 0 7 21 .240 .314 .326 61 .284 .188 .236 .332 .380 101.2%
2009 average projection 101 90 22 5 0 1 1 0 8 21 .239 .313 .335 62 .286 .190 .238 .334 .382 101.8%
2009 actuals 101 94 28 4 0 1 0 3 2 11 .298 .309 .372 55 .281 .185 .233 .329 .376


Cervelli had shown pretty good plate discipline in the minors, but it deserted him in the majors. Despite that, he was able to come fairly close to his projected OBP because he hit six more singles. That also explains why he was able to exceed his SLG by a fair amount.

The .298 average is nice, but it was sort of empty, and it's doubtful he'll be able to replicate the same type of performance in 2010 if he has to rely on hitting .298 to do it. The good news is he should walk a little more and he's still going to be just 24, so he has room for growth in his offensive game. While it's probably unlikely he'll be more than a backup, he should be a decent one, especially if the good defense he showed in 2009 carries forward.

Sort of like Cervelli, Ramiro Pena hadn't gotten past AA prior to 2009, and he hadn't really impressed there either, slugging a monstrous .297 in 2008 for Trenton. Pena's calling card isn't his bat though, it's his glove. In a surprise, he made the Yankees on opening day as a backup IF, since Alex Rodriguez was out rehabbing his hip and the only other backup IF on the roster was Angel Berroa.

Because of Pena's unimpressive minor league resume, his projections were unimpressive.

ramiro pena PA AB H 2B 3B HR SB CS BB SO AVG OBP SLG BR/650 wOBA -2 Std -1 Std +1 Std +2 Std %
2009 chone projection 121 113 26 4 1 0 2 1 8 25 .233 .284 .297 48 .258 .173 .215 .300 .342 86.7%
2009 marcel projection 121 110 25 5 0 2 1 0 8 20 .224 .272 .320 50 .255 .170 .212 .297 .339 85.7%
2009 pecota projection 121 108 24 4 0 1 1 0 10 16 .223 .285 .286 47 .255 .171 .213 .297 .339 85.8%
2009 tht projection 121 113 25 4 1 1 1 1 7 22 .224 .276 .291 45 .252 .168 .210 .294 .336 84.8%
2009 zips projection 121 114 26 3 0 0 4 2 6 16 .224 .269 .263 39 .240 .158 .199 .282 .323 80.9%
2009 cairo projection 121 112 26 4 1 1 1 1 7 21 .232 .282 .290 46 .255 .171 .213 .297 .340 85.9%
2009 average projection 121 112 25 4 1 1 2 1 8 20 .227 .278 .291 46 .252 .168 .210 .295 .337 85.0%
2009 actuals 121 115 33 6 1 1 4 1 5 20 .287 .317 .383 71 .297 .208 .253 .342 .386


Like Cervelli, Pena hit more and walked less than expected. However, he did show a little more pop than projected, with two extra doubles. Obviously when we're dealing with sample sizes like this we shouldn't try to infer too much about what it means going forward, but Pena's final line in 2009 was better than replacement level, and would have made him about a win better than replacement level on offense if he had done it over 650 PAs.

So, how about the Yankee defense?

Since I started blogging in 2004, there's been one recurring theme with the Yankees. Their defense has generally been bad to awful. While you can hit and pitch well enough to overcome that, it can be frustrating to watch players not making plays other players can make.

When the Yankees let Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi go and replaced them with Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher, that alone looked like a pretty decent defensive upgrade. Here's how the defense projected heading into 2009 compared to what they actually ended up doing.
Player Pos pZR pUZR pRAA zRSAA uRSAA aRSAA diff
Jorge Posada C -5 -10 -5
Jose Molina C 2 -2 -2 -2 -4
Francisco Cervelli C 0 0 0 2 2 2 2
Kevin Cash C 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1
Mark Teixeira 1B 5 2 3 8 -4 2 -1
Juan Miranda 1B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robinson Cano 2B 2 -2 0 -2 -5 -3 -4
Alex Rodriguez 3B -2 -1 -2 -6 -9 -7 -6
Cody Ransom 3B 0 0 0 -4 -4 -4 -4
Angel Berroa 3B 0 0 0 0 -3 -1 -1
Melky Cabrera CF 2 -2 0 0 -2 -1 -1
Brett Gardner CF 1 2 1 0 7 4 2
Johnny Damon LF -1 4 2 0 -9 -5 -6
Freddy Guzman LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Swisher RF 1 1 1 -4 -1 -3 -4
Eric Hinske RF 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Xavier Nady RF 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 0
Shelley Duncan RF 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0
Derek Jeter SS -5 -5 -5 -2 7 2 7
Ramiro Pena SS 0 0 0 -2 1 0 0
Total -2 -27 -25


pZR: Projected runs saved above average according to zone rating, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pUZR: Projected runs saved above average according to UZR, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pRAA: Average of pZR and pUZR
zRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to zone rating
uRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to UZR
aRSAA: Average of zRSAA and uRSAA
diff: aRSAA - pRAA (negative means worse than projected)

The Yankee defense actually didn't play as well as projected, with the primary culprits being Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. Cody Ransom and Angel Berroa's contributions also didn't really help. On the plus side, Derek Jeter was seven runs better than projected and Brett Gardner was two runs better.

Last year's team was about 40 runs below average, so at the very least they were better than that.

Interestingly, I completely forgot to do a season review for Mark Teixeira and Alex Rodriguez, so I'll post that next, then Mo's and then that should wrap up the backwards-looking stuff for now.
--Posted at 8:54 am by SG / 101 Comments | - (169)




Friday, September 25, 2009

Putting Linear Weights in Context, 2009 Edition

About a year ago, I wrote a post about putting linear Weights in context. The linked post has a detailed description of the hows and whys of doing this, so I'll just summarize the process briefly here. I found the spreadsheet I used to calculate that, so I figured I would re-run it for 2009.

Linear weights assigns run values to events based on their average impact to a team's run scoring. For example, a single is worth something like 0.47 to 0.49 runs on average. However, that same hit in context can actually be more or less valuable than that. If there is no one on base, a single is only worth about 0.29 runs on average. If the bases are loaded, that exact same single would be worth 1.38 runs on average.

A player can't control the context of when he bats, so looking at something like contextual linear weights should not be used as a way to evaluate a player's talent. However, it can be somewhat useful in looking at how the season has unfolded for that player and/or his team.

So, here's a table showing the Yankees' hitters, their PAs and triple slash stats, their wOBA, then two more columns. The first is context-neutral batting runs using linear weights (cnBR). The next column is also for batting runs, but this time adjusted for whatever baserunners are on base when the player hit (cBR). You can go even further into that by also accounting for the number of outs, but that changes my spreadsheet from eight worksheets to 24, so I don't do that. Fangraphs does calculate these using base out state, which I believe they call wRAA.

The final column (diff) is just cBR - cnBR. A positive number here means the player was better in situations with men on base, a negative number means that he was worse. I'm sure you can guess who's going to be have the largest difference without even looking at the table, but here it is.

One note, the data source I use for this (David Pinto's day by day database) does not split players by team, so players like Eric Hinske and Jerry Hairston Jr. will have their combined stats represented below. Also note that these numbers are NOT position-adjusted, and are compared to AVERAGE, not replacement level.

player pa avg obp slg wOBA cnBR cBR diff
Mark Teixeira 676 .292 .383 .567 .376 43.3 39.7 -3.6
Hideki Matsui 499 .278 .371 .525 .367 24.8 31.1 6.3
Alex Rodriguez 508 .283 .402 .519 .375 29.2 26.2 -3.0
Nick Swisher 573 .251 .368 .495 .354 21.3 22.9 1.6
Johnny Damon 598 .285 .366 .497 .358 22.1 21.3 -0.8
Jorge Posada 419 .283 .360 .529 .355 16.4 20.3 4.0
Derek Jeter 684 .329 .399 .460 .367 26.8 14.4 -12.4
Brett Gardner 257 .279 .354 .397 .327 1.2 6.7 5.5
Eric Hinske 211 .242 .351 .444 .331 4.2 4.4 0.2
Robinson Cano 645 .320 .350 .515 .352 19.2 0.5 -18.8
Freddy Guzman 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 0.0
Juan Miranda 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 .900 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shelley Duncan 10 .200 .200 .200 .180 -1.3 -0.7 0.6
Xavier Nady 29 .286 .310 .429 .303 -0.8 -0.9 -0.1
Ramiro Pena 108 .282 .315 .359 .292 -3.3 -1.7 1.5
Melky Cabrera 511 .273 .335 .416 .313 -1.5 -2.2 -0.7
Francisco Cervelli 89 .279 .292 .349 .276 -3.6 -2.4 1.2
Kevin Cash 28 .231 .250 .308 .235 -2.1 -2.6 -0.5
Cody Ransom 86 .190 .256 .329 .244 -6.0 -3.7 2.3
Angel Berroa 53 .143 .208 .184 .168 -7.1 -5.9 1.2
Jose Molina 136 .221 .294 .270 .259 -9.1 -7.2 1.9
Jerry Hairston 415 .251 .313 .397 .300 -5.1 -8.0 -3.0
Total 6103 .284 .361 .479 .366 168.8 152 -17


wOBA:Weighted on base average
cnBR:Context-neutral batting runs using linear weights
cBR:Batting runs adjusted for base runner state
diff:cBR - cnBR

I expected Cano to look pretty bad here, but not quite this bad. Jeter's number surprised me, considering he's so clutchy and all. At first I thought my calculations must have been wrong, but in actuality, the Yankees component stats on offense say they should have scored something like 20-30 runs more than they have to this point, which this data support (a cumulative total of -17).

On the positive side, you have Hideki Matsui, TSBG and Jorge Posada leading the pack. Most of the rest of the team is clustered right around average, which is what we should expect.

I totally forgot that Kevin Cash was a Yankee this year.

Just for the hell of it, here are the top 100 players in baseball sorted by cBR.

player pa avg obp slg wOBA cnBR cBR diff
Albert Pujols 660 .330 .447 .676 .399 77.5 79.6 2.2
Prince Fielder 671 .297 .408 .595 .385 55.1 58.6 3.6
Jason Bay 604 .267 .387 .549 .378 36.6 52.2 15.6
Joe Mauer 552 .371 .442 .606 .416 55.6 49.5 -6.1
Derrek Lee 595 .308 .392 .588 .388 43.1 49.2 6.2
Hanley Ramirez 621 .350 .414 .553 .387 46.7 48.6 1.9
Ryan Braun 659 .315 .384 .541 .380 38.5 46.7 8.2
Adam Dunn 627 .280 .410 .556 .381 45.9 45.4 -0.5
Chase Utley 651 .294 .412 .530 .390 45.4 45.2 -0.2
Kevin Youkilis 553 .302 .410 .542 .387 38.4 42.0 3.5
Matt Holliday 637 .312 .391 .520 .370 34.9 40.4 5.5
Mark Teixeira 676 .292 .383 .567 .376 43.3 39.7 -3.6
Miguel Cabrera 630 .332 .402 .556 .382 41.0 39.7 -1.3
Pablo Sandoval 590 .326 .381 .545 .366 34.2 34.7 0.5
Ryan Howard 660 .272 .353 .564 .359 32.0 34.1 2.1
Ben Zobrist 557 .287 .400 .523 .378 34.0 33.6 -0.4
Adrian Gonzalez 641 .274 .399 .554 .367 40.2 33.4 -6.8
Adam Lind 631 .300 .366 .541 .361 29.6 32.9 3.4
Joey Votto 503 .314 .408 .543 .380 34.5 32.0 -2.5
Hideki Matsui 499 .278 .371 .525 .367 24.8 31.1 6.3
Manny Ramirez 400 .298 .420 .553 .367 31.1 30.1 -0.9
Kendry Morales 591 .303 .349 .560 .352 26.1 29.9 3.8
Jayson Werth 628 .271 .376 .516 .360 29.5 29.9 0.4
Jason Bartlett 531 .319 .382 .494 .364 24.2 29.3 5.1
Torii Hunter 480 .303 .371 .521 .361 22.2 29.0 6.8
Justin Upton 553 .304 .371 .545 .369 28.1 28.9 0.9
Todd Helton 602 .317 .409 .480 .371 31.6 28.8 -2.7
Justin Morneau 590 .274 .363 .516 .345 24.0 28.6 4.6
Lance Berkman 521 .268 .395 .504 .357 26.9 27.4 0.5
Victor Martinez 636 .299 .377 .473 .355 21.9 27.3 5.4
Aramis Ramirez 325 .322 .391 .521 .377 17.0 26.5 9.5
Alex Rodriguez 508 .283 .402 .519 .375 29.2 26.2 -3.0
Carlos Pena 570 .227 .356 .537 .347 25.4 25.9 0.5
Chipper Jones 553 .268 .391 .436 .335 18.7 24.9 6.2
Bobby Abreu 636 .293 .393 .424 .348 19.5 24.6 5.1
Brian McCann 510 .284 .347 .497 .341 12.5 24.3 11.8
Andre Ethier 651 .279 .364 .525 .352 26.2 23.9 -2.3
Ichiro Suzuki 634 .355 .388 .472 .351 27.3 23.7 -3.5
Shin-Soo Choo 643 .303 .397 .481 .366 30.7 23.1 -7.6
Nick Swisher 573 .251 .368 .495 .354 21.3 22.9 1.6
Jim Thome 427 .248 .368 .485 .350 14.5 22.9 8.3
Casey McGehee 362 .302 .365 .503 .355 12.2 22.6 10.4
Yunel Escobar 553 .299 .378 .441 .349 12.2 22.4 10.2
Mark Reynolds 625 .266 .357 .560 .365 30.7 22.4 -8.3
Nick Johnson 558 .291 .421 .407 .364 21.5 22.3 0.8
Paul Konerko 596 .283 .354 .503 .347 19.1 21.4 2.3
Jason Kubel 532 .300 .370 .530 .356 24.7 21.4 -3.3
Johnny Damon 598 .285 .366 .497 .358 22.1 21.3 -0.8
Brian Roberts 670 .286 .355 .458 .336 15.8 21.2 5.4
Evan Longoria 632 .283 .364 .532 .352 24.3 21.2 -3.1
Andrew McCutchen 443 .281 .354 .472 .340 12.3 20.8 8.5
Matt Kemp 628 .304 .360 .500 .349 21.0 20.6 -0.4
Adam LaRoche 584 .283 .360 .505 .344 20.6 20.6 0.0
J.D. Drew 520 .267 .387 .495 .362 24.5 20.5 -4.0
Raul Ibanez 533 .277 .347 .565 .353 23.0 20.4 -2.6
Jorge Posada 419 .283 .360 .529 .355 16.4 20.3 4.0
Chone Figgins 686 .301 .399 .401 .354 19.7 20.0 0.3
Josh Willingham 466 .272 .380 .520 .368 22.2 19.9 -2.3
Ryan Zimmerman 651 .290 .361 .518 .352 23.6 19.9 -3.7
Luke Scott 476 .252 .338 .486 .331 10.8 19.9 9.1
Christopher Coghlan 520 .314 .385 .452 .356 18.3 19.8 1.5
Carlos Beltran 328 .332 .421 .512 .374 20.9 19.4 -1.5
Troy Tulowitzki 587 .288 .370 .538 .365 26.8 18.9 -7.8
Brad Hawpe 558 .285 .385 .506 .361 25.1 18.6 -6.6
Seth Smith 367 .302 .387 .528 .371 20.5 18.2 -2.4
Alberto Callaspo 592 .301 .355 .451 .334 9.8 18.0 8.2
David Wright 587 .310 .395 .448 .354 20.0 17.6 -2.5
Matt Diaz 396 .318 .391 .494 .371 17.0 17.4 0.4
Marco Scutaro 675 .282 .379 .409 .344 14.4 17.1 2.7
Aaron Hill 686 .286 .328 .492 .335 10.6 17.1 6.5
Billy Butler 629 .299 .358 .483 .345 15.8 16.4 0.6
Ryan Ludwick 506 .271 .334 .449 .324 4.9 16.4 11.4
Shane Victorino 648 .295 .363 .448 .342 15.6 16.4 0.8
Nate McLouth 538 .267 .355 .447 .337 10.6 16.2 5.6
Nelson Cruz 504 .262 .335 .525 .339 15.4 16.1 0.6
Russell Branyan 504 .251 .347 .520 .343 18.0 16.0 -1.9
James Loney 616 .288 .364 .413 .324 7.1 15.9 8.9
Carlos Lee 624 .304 .349 .498 .343 16.8 15.7 -1.1
Denard Span 611 .305 .388 .409 .347 15.4 14.9 -0.5
Michael Young 573 .322 .375 .523 .368 26.1 14.8 -11.3
Ian Kinsler 594 .249 .320 .481 .326 7.6 14.7 7.2
Derek Jeter 684 .329 .399 .460 .367 26.8 14.4 -12.4
Dustin Pedroia 666 .300 .374 .446 .347 16.3 14.0 -2.3
Miguel Montero 439 .298 .358 .479 .340 12.4 13.9 1.5
Rajai Davis 383 .319 .376 .435 .348 8.5 13.3 4.8
Garrett Jones 310 .301 .371 .594 .374 20.3 13.1 -7.2
Felipe Lopez 637 .309 .380 .429 .345 16.9 13.0 -3.9
Marlon Byrd 569 .282 .325 .468 .322 5.8 12.8 7.0
Scott Rolen 509 .308 .367 .452 .345 15.0 12.6 -2.4
Cody Ross 598 .273 .323 .473 .326 3.2 12.1 8.9
Lyle Overbay 465 .269 .374 .470 .345 15.6 12.1 -3.5
Nick Markakis 668 .293 .344 .448 .332 9.2 12.1 2.8
David DeJesus 619 .283 .349 .436 .332 7.5 11.9 4.4
Asdrubal Cabrera 545 .305 .360 .436 .336 7.5 11.8 4.3
Adam Jones 519 .277 .335 .457 .326 4.3 11.6 7.3
Casey Blake 554 .280 .365 .472 .339 16.2 11.2 -5.0
Dan Uggla 629 .240 .353 .458 .337 13.7 10.7 -3.1
Nolan Reimold 411 .279 .365 .466 .348 11.3 10.7 -0.7
Jonny Gomes 302 .268 .341 .543 .351 10.4 10.6 0.2
Michael Cuddyer 599 .276 .336 .519 .343 13.6 10.0 -3.6


When I run these esoteric type stats, there are always names that jump out at me. In this case, it's Jason Bay.

And Albert Pujols is so good in the National League, he could probably hit league average in the AL.

One last table, showing players with an ABS(diff) >= 5.0.

player pa avg obp slg wOBA cnBR cBR diff
Jason Bay 604 .267 .387 .549 .378 36.6 52.2 15.6
Aubrey Huff 571 .245 .310 .394 .289 -11.2 0.9 12.1
Brian McCann 510 .284 .347 .497 .341 12.5 24.3 11.8
Ryan Ludwick 506 .271 .334 .449 .324 4.9 16.4 11.4
Gary Matthews Jr. 343 .247 .335 .357 .300 -4.9 5.8 10.7
Casey McGehee 362 .302 .365 .503 .355 12.2 22.6 10.4
Yunel Escobar 553 .299 .378 .441 .349 12.2 22.4 10.2
Pedro Feliz 584 .262 .308 .381 .290 -13.7 -3.5 10.2
Edgar Renteria 505 .250 .307 .328 .273 -21.3 -11.8 9.5
Aramis Ramirez 325 .322 .391 .521 .377 17.0 26.5 9.5
Luke Scott 476 .252 .338 .486 .331 10.8 19.9 9.1
Cody Ross 598 .273 .323 .473 .326 3.2 12.1 8.9
James Loney 616 .288 .364 .413 .324 7.1 15.9 8.9
David Eckstein 515 .260 .320 .333 .287 -15.4 -6.5 8.9
Andrew McCutchen 443 .281 .354 .472 .340 12.3 20.8 8.5
Kaz Matsui 481 .252 .301 .354 .280 -15.3 -7.0 8.4
Jim Thome 427 .248 .368 .485 .350 14.5 22.9 8.3
Alberto Callaspo 592 .301 .355 .451 .334 9.8 18.0 8.2
Ryan Braun 659 .315 .384 .541 .380 38.5 46.7 8.2
Kurt Suzuki 581 .269 .308 .411 .301 -9.4 -1.5 7.9
Randy Winn 571 .260 .317 .353 .288 -13.7 -6.1 7.6
Adam Jones 519 .277 .335 .457 .326 4.3 11.6 7.3
Ian Kinsler 594 .249 .320 .481 .326 7.6 14.7 7.2
Kevin Kouzmanoff 556 .257 .304 .421 .297 -12.0 -4.9 7.1
Jason Giambi 350 .204 .349 .391 .320 1.0 8.1 7.0
Marlon Byrd 569 .282 .325 .468 .322 5.8 12.8 7.0
Josh Anderson 272 .240 .279 .306 .258 -17.0 -10.1 6.9
Torii Hunter 480 .303 .371 .521 .361 22.2 29.0 6.8
Nick Punto 385 .232 .332 .291 .285 -12.1 -5.6 6.6
Aaron Hill 686 .286 .328 .492 .335 10.6 17.1 6.5
Hideki Matsui 499 .278 .371 .525 .367 24.8 31.1 6.3
Chipper Jones 553 .268 .391 .436 .335 18.7 24.9 6.2
Derrek Lee 595 .308 .392 .588 .388 43.1 49.2 6.2
Rod Barajas 425 .231 .264 .409 .270 -14.3 -8.2 6.1
Chase Headley 574 .264 .340 .402 .316 -3.4 2.5 6.0
Mark DeRosa 549 .256 .324 .447 .320 1.5 7.4 5.9
Nate McLouth 538 .267 .355 .447 .337 10.6 16.2 5.6
Brett Gardner 257 .279 .354 .397 .327 1.2 6.7 5.5
Matt Holliday 637 .312 .391 .520 .370 34.9 40.4 5.5
Brian Roberts 670 .286 .355 .458 .336 15.8 21.2 5.4
Victor Martinez 636 .299 .377 .473 .355 21.9 27.3 5.4
Gabe Gross 311 .239 .341 .373 .309 -1.7 3.5 5.3
Brandon Inge 585 .232 .323 .418 .314 -3.2 2.0 5.2
Khalil Greene 187 .205 .278 .355 .265 -8.3 -3.1 5.1
Casey Kotchman 404 .271 .342 .391 .306 -1.8 3.3 5.1
Jason Bartlett 531 .319 .382 .494 .364 24.2 29.3 5.1
Bobby Abreu 636 .293 .393 .424 .348 19.5 24.6 5.1
Jeff Mathis 250 .206 .288 .309 .265 -12.1 -7.1 5.0
Gerardo Enrique Parra 462 .292 .327 .408 .310 -6.4 -1.3 5.0
Alex Gonzalez 388 .239 .276 .354 .259 -17.5 -12.5 5.0
Carlos Ruiz 363 .253 .353 .423 .316 3.8 8.7 5.0
Placido Polanco 616 .284 .330 .404 .312 -5.2 -0.2 5.0
Casey Blake 554 .280 .365 .472 .339 16.2 11.2 -5.0
Rafael Furcal 641 .264 .331 .367 .303 -10.5 -15.6 -5.1
Wladimir Balentien 279 .233 .308 .382 .290 -5.8 -11.1 -5.3
Yadier Molina 527 .291 .366 .383 .328 -1.9 -7.2 -5.3
Chris Dickerson 295 .277 .373 .375 .329 2.8 -2.8 -5.6
Brendan Harris 436 .262 .310 .364 .290 -14.2 -20.2 -6.0
Luis Valbuena 359 .234 .284 .387 .279 -12.7 -18.7 -6.0
Fernando Tatis 351 .267 .328 .415 .308 -3.4 -9.5 -6.0
Curtis Granderson 652 .247 .328 .447 .319 6.0 -0.1 -6.0
J.J. Hardy 453 .228 .300 .356 .283 -16.3 -22.3 -6.1
Joe Mauer 552 .371 .442 .606 .416 55.6 49.5 -6.1
Dexter Fowler 472 .270 .371 .414 .337 9.0 2.9 -6.1
Carl Crawford 640 .305 .363 .452 .345 15.3 8.7 -6.6
A.J. Pierzynski 516 .307 .339 .436 .320 1.1 -5.5 -6.6
Brad Hawpe 558 .285 .385 .506 .361 25.1 18.6 -6.6
Cameron Maybin 159 .218 .296 .345 .272 -5.8 -12.4 -6.6
Adrian Gonzalez 641 .274 .399 .554 .367 40.2 33.4 -6.8
Garrett Jones 310 .301 .371 .594 .374 20.3 13.1 -7.2
Ryan Hanigan 275 .268 .360 .339 .299 -2.8 -10.0 -7.3
Shin-Soo Choo 643 .303 .397 .481 .366 30.7 23.1 -7.6
Troy Tulowitzki 587 .288 .370 .538 .365 26.8 18.9 -7.8
Mike Napoli 410 .268 .346 .481 .340 9.6 1.7 -8.0
Skip Schumaker 556 .304 .363 .396 .329 5.3 -3.0 -8.2
Mark Reynolds 625 .266 .357 .560 .365 30.7 22.4 -8.3
Dioner Navarro 384 .219 .260 .319 .247 -26.5 -34.9 -8.4
Fred Lewis 323 .265 .356 .403 .321 2.3 -6.3 -8.6
Jeff Francoeur 597 .277 .307 .411 .293 -10.1 -19.0 -9.0
Vernon Wells 639 .262 .315 .402 .300 -10.4 -20.1 -9.7
Carlos Gonzalez 283 .280 .353 .520 .348 10.8 1.0 -9.8
Michael Young 573 .322 .375 .523 .368 26.1 14.8 -11.3
Derek Jeter 684 .329 .399 .460 .367 26.8 14.4 -12.4
Robinson Cano 645 .320 .350 .515 .352 19.2 0.5 -18.8


Again, I'll reiterate that this doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the skill of these players. All it tells us is the timing of their hits/walks/outs with respect to the state of baserunners when they occurred. It doesn't care about the score of the game, or how many outs there are. A two run single in the first inning of a 15-0 blowout would be worth the same as a two run single that turned a 3-2 deficit into a 4-3 walkoff win. Also, as I stated earlier, these are not position-adjusted and are compared to average, not replacement level. So knock down 1B and corner OFs some and boost catchers and middle infielders.

--Posted at 6:29 am by SG / 44 Comments | - (140)




Monday, October 20, 2008

2009 Defensive Projections for Current and Former Yankees




GP: Games
Inn: Defensive Innings at Position
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double Plays
PM: Plays Made
CH: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
Avg ZR: ZR by average defender at the same position
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games




Inn : Defensive innings at position
PO : Putouts
A : Assists
TE : Throwing errors
FE : Fielding errors
WP+PB: Wild pitches plus passed balls
SBA: Stolen base attempts
SB: Stolen bases
CS: Caught stealings
CS%: Caught stealing percentage (CS / SBA)
RS: Runs saved compared to average
RS/130: Runs saved pro-rated to 130 games

Projections are based on zone rating over the last four seasons for non-catchers, weighted, regressed and aged.  For catchers, projections are based on the stats listed for the last five seasons, again weighted, regressed and aged.  Don’t read too much into the numbers for players with small sample sizes at their listed positions.

In other Hot Stove stuff:
Agent: Peavy won’t be pitching for Mets, Yankees.

I like Peavy, but I think his numbers get a fair boost from Petco and the NL.  Put him in the AL and with the Yankee defense behind him and he’s probably a non-zero amount worse, although still pretty good.

NY Post: YANKS WANT TO OFFER BOWA SECOND THIRD CHANCE.

I can’t see the Dodgers letting him go, but it’d be nice…

--Posted at 8:48 am by SG / 116 Comments | - (258)




Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Defense Edition)

Before getting to the pitching, here’s a quick look at how the 2008 Yankees performed defensively compared to their projections. For my defensive statistics, I use zone rating.  If you want to read more about how these numbers are calculated you can read this post or this post.  If you want a good general overview of zone rating, read this article by Chris Dial.

First up, here’s how I had the Yankees projected on a team level at each position compared to how they actually ended up doing.

Anyone that wants to look at the details behind the defensive projections can check out this entry so I won’t rehash all that here. 

Here’s a rundown by position.

Catcher

rvTE +/-: Run value of throwing errors
rvFE +/-: Run value of fielding errors
rvWP+PB+/-: Run value of wild pitches and passed balls
rvSBA+/-: Run value of stolen base attempts
rvSB+/-: Run value of stolen bases
rvCS+/-: Run value of caught stealings
RSAA: Runs saved above average

Jorge Posada’s a very valuable player at catcher, but that’s because of his bat.  His defense is usually average or slightly below average.  Posada’s injury led to Jose Molina playing a lot more than expected.  As we know, he hit like 1991 Bob Geren, but his glove was outstanding. Using my catcher defense system, he was the best defensive catcher in the AL, and second in MLB behind Jason Kendall.

Posada’s shoulder problems led him to be awful, 5 runs below average in just 234 innings.  It’s going to be tough to project the 2009 Yankees without knowing if Posada can handle catching the majority of the time.  If he can’t throw better than he did in 2008, he probably gives back the majority of his offensive value on defense.

First Base

G: Games
GS: Games started
INN: Defensive innings at position
Ch: Fieldable chances
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double plays
ZR: Zone rating (PM/Ch)
PM: Plays made
AvgPM: Plays made by an average defender over the same # of chances
Diff: PM - AvgPM
RS: Runs saved above average (Diff times run value of play not made)

This projected to be a sore spot defensively because Jason Giambi is just not a good defender.  Giambi had a ZR of .801 compared to his projected .796, which is basically the same thing.  The Richie Sexson pickup cost the Yankees another four runs at 1B in just 19 games. Nice. 

Replacing Giambi with an average defender is probably a ten run upgrade.  If they replace him with Teixeira it’s probably close to a 15 run defensive upgrade.

Second Base

Robinson Cano had a very strange season on both sides of the ball.  We know he hit like garbage for most of the year. What’s interesting about his defense is he was actually playing very well through July 9, as detailed here.  Cano went from a zone rating of .865 and a runs saved above average of +8 to a zone rating of .799 and a runs saved above average of -8 in a span of 49 games.  From September 5 on he seemed to recover, putting up a zone rating of .884 and saving 4 runs above average over the rest of the season. 

Cano will probably project as an average defender next year instead of a plus defender because of this year, but that’d be a 5 run upgrade.

Third Base

If you just look at the runs saved total for Rodriguez it may seem like he was disappointing, but it’s interesting to note that his zone rating of .786 is actually the highest of his career at 3B.  So what happened?  The average AL 3B zone rating shot way up to .791 this year, after being about .767 from 2004 - 2007.  In a league where .767 is average, Rodriguez would have been a +6 defender.

Morgan Ensberg and Wilson Betemit were both craptacular in limited action, and that’s the main reason 3B was so negative overall.  As someone who thought an Ensberg/Betemit platoon could approach league average when Rodriguez opted out, let’s just say it’s a good thing I’m not running the Yankees…

Rodriguez probably won’t be any better defensively next year.  At his age we should expect him to lose a run or two of value defensively, so I’d say we should expect 3B to be 2 runs worse next year.

Shortstop

He’s the poster boy for defensive ineptitude, and many of the people who use defensive metrics can barely contain their glee when using them to tear apart his game, but Derek Jeter had a good defensive season this year if you believe zone rating.  Whether it was an offseason training regimen that improved his agility, better positioning, or a more favorable distibution of balls in play, the difference between last year was stark, both statistically and visually.  Realistically we shouldn’t expect it to happen again in 2009, but he was projected around a -10 coming into 2008, and probably will project to be a -6 or -7 in 2009.  2008 Jeter was more valuable than 2007 Jeter because of the glove.

With the AG gone, backup SS is looking like a problem next year.  Cody Ransom did not impress in Fenway defensively.

Left Field

I thought Johnny Damon would end up better in LF and for a while he was above average before falling off, but if he’s the LF next year he should be average or slightly below.  Xavier Nady didn’t really impress in LF, but for his career he’s been an average RF (-2 LF in a very small sample size).  Hideki Matsui has to be a full-time DH at this point.  He was awful this year in LF, and his knees won’t help that.

Center Field

We all know Melky couldn’t hit this year, but he did play solid defense.  Damon wasn’t awful in CF, although I doubt he could hold up full-time.  Brett Gardner only got 22 games in CF, but his ZR was ridiculously good and he saved 3 runs in very limited time.  While I still am not sold on him being able to hit enough to be a starting CF, if his glove and baserunning are as good as they appear to be, it’s very possible he can start in CF with a slightly below average bat.  It depends on how below average he is of course.

Right Field

Coming into 2008, Bobby Abreu projected to be about average in RF.  Instead he was the absolute worst defensive player in the AL according to zone rating.  Abreu’s not obviously bad as far as making errors, but he’s extremely tentative and just doesn’t seem to get to balls that most other players get to.  Still, he’s probably not as bad of a defender as his 2008 stats make him look.  If I had to project him next year I’d probably project him around a -10 or so.  If I were the Yankees I’d still offer him arbitration and hope he declines, because he probably will still be a pretty good player next year if you get stuck with him.  I wouldn’t entertain the thought of signing him to a multi-year extension though.  Xavier Nady should be able to fill RF next year and play average or slightly below average defense, although he’s not going to hit like Abreu has.

So going into 2008, the Yankees looked to be about two wins worse than an average defense.  They actually wound up four wins worse, and that’s almost entirely on Abreu.  They should be able to upgrade 1B fairly easily (let’s say +10), Cano should be better at 2B(+5), Jeter will likely be a fair bit worse(-10), Rodriguez and Damon will probably be a little worse(-4 combined).  CF depends on if they go with Melky/Gardner or bring someone in(??), and Nady should be better than 2008 Abreu(+15).  If Posada is the catcher, that’s a defensive hit(-15).

So minus CF, adding all that up we get +1 compared to 2008.  So yeah, don’t expect a much better defense next year.

--Posted at 11:30 am by SG / 50 Comments | - (235)




Monday, September 29, 2008

Why Did the 2008 Yankees Disappoint?(Offense Edition)

Coming into this season, the Yankees looked to be a contender for best team in baseball. Although they were taking a calculated risk in relying on some very young pitchers, they were returning the bulk of a team that has scored 968 runs last year.  Even with expected declines in their older players, they still projected to have the best offense in baseball.

When I ran the Diamond Mind Projection Blowout, they were the best team in the AL in most of the projection systems I used.  When I looked at the position players and the pitching staff I arrived at the same basic conclusion, the the Yankees should have won somewhere between 93-97 games.

As we all know, things didn’t work out that way.  The question I want to look at is why?  Were the projections wrong?  Was it injuries?  Was it a lack of testicular fortitude?  Let’s see if we can figure it out.

The projections I’ll be referencing here are the composite projections of several different systems, as detailed in this February blog entry.  I’m going to go through position by position looking at the projected starters compared to what the actual primary starters ended up doing, then looking at the bench as a unit. 

One other thing, while offense in the AL was down for most of this year compared to last year, the difference has narrowed signficantly of late to the point that it’s probably no longer statistically significant. The league average line of .268/.336/.420 equates to a BR/650 of 80 this season compared last year’s line of .271/.338/.423 which equates to a BR/650 of 81.  The BR(batting runs) I’ll be using here are context-neutral raw batting runs using linear weights, not position-adjusted or adjusted for base-out states. 

Catcher
Coming off his career year in 2007, Jorge Posada was projected to give back a fair amount of value in 2008.  Posada was projected to hit .286/.380/.469, a performance that would have been worth 76 batting runs according to linear weights using my assumed 500 plate appearances. 

Posada went down to a shoulder injury after just 195 PA, which made Jose Molina (Molino for the regulars) the primary starter.  While Molino had a strong defensive season, he hit like crap.  Molina hit .216/.263/.313 over 297 PA, which was worth 21 batting runs.  The difference between Posada’s projection and Molina’s actual performance as the primary starter was 55 runs, which was a 5.5 win underperformance.  BTW, disparities in playing time at all the positions will be accounted for when we get to the bench.

First Base
Another risk the Yankees took entering 2008 was that Jason Giambi would be able to
-Out-produce a disastrous 2007
-Play passable defense at first base
-Stay healthy all season

If you had asked me the likelihood of all three of those things happening, I’d have put it around the same likelihood as Mike Mussina winning 20 games. 

Giambi managed to achieve all three things for the most part.  His glove was bad, but not horrifically bad, and he was productive and healthy for most of the year, although 45% of his production came in the 45 games from April 22 - Jun 17 where he hit .319/.441/.694 (40 BR).  Over the other 100 games he played, he hit .213/.342/.414 (48 BR).  I don’t know if this type of split is particularly meaningful, so consider it just a random factoid.

The 2008 projections for Giambi weren’t bad on a rate basis (.245/.387/.474) but his playing time projections were pretty pessimistic (300 PA).  He projected to be worth about 46 batting runs because of that.  Instead, Giambi hit for a little more power but a little less OBP (.247/.373/.502), but thanks to exceeding his playing time projections he was far more valuable than he projected to be, exceeding his projected batting runs by 42 runs, a 4.2 win offensive upgrade.  The 2008 Yankees’ underperformance from their pre-season projections can’t be laid at Giambi’s feet.

Second Base
Pass.

Well, I wish I could pass anyway.  Robinson Cano seemed to be on the cusp of becoming the best 2B in the AL.  Cano projected to hit .308/.348/.482 and play plus defense and was at an age where he could still realistically be expected to improve.  Cano’s projected offense over 585 plate appearances would have made him worth 84 batting runs. Instead, Cano digressed in just about every facet of his game, hitting .271/.305/.410 over 634 PA, which was only worth 68 BR.  This was a downgrade of 1.6 wins.

Third Base
Boo.

Alex Rodriguez was justifiably the AL’s MVP in 2007.  He was rightfully expected to regress somewhat in 2008, projected to hit .300/.406/.574 over 650 PA, which would have been worth 123 batting runs.  On a rate basis, he basically hit his projection, but thanks to a leg injury that cost him 56 PA compared to his projection, he was 14 runs less valuable than projected, a downgrade of 1.4 wins.  It’s also a fact that Rodriguez’s performance in more crucial plate appearances were less productive than his context-neutral numbers show. This was not a problem exclusive to Rodriguez, so I’ll devote a section to that as well.

Shortstop
Derek Jeter came into 2008 projected to hit .307/.379/.438 over 600 PA, which would have been worth 86 BR.  A late hot streak pushed him closer to his projections as he ended the season at .300/.363/.408 over 668 PA, a total of 82 BR.  He was less valuable than projected on a rate basis, but by exceeding his projected playing time his overall value was only about four runs less than projected.

Left Field
Johnny Damon was shifted to LF due to his defensive decline, the seeming emergence of Melky Cabrera and Hideki Matsui’s bad knees.  This looked like a disaster in the making coming off a poor offensive 2007, although it did also seem like a defensive upgrade.  Damon projected to hit .280/.353/.423 over 585 PA, a line that would have been worth 78 batting runs.  He blew that away by hitting .303/.375/.461 over 623 PA.  So like first base, left field ended up as a net gain on the pre-season projections, to the tune of 15 runs, or 1.5 wins.

Center Field
After a promising rookie season, Melky Cabrera declined in 2007.  The projections expected him to bounce back, thanks in part to his youth.  Melky was projected to hit .282/.344/.406 over 550 PA for a total of 68 BR.  Instead, he got even worse, hitting .249/.301/.341 over 453 PA before mercifully being demoted to Scranton.  Cabrera’s line was a downgrade of 27 BR, or 2.7 wins.  And that’s all I have to say about that.

Right Field
Bobby Abreu came into 2008 projected to hit .277/.383/.439 over 600 PA, which would have been worth 89 BR.  He exceeded that by hitting .296/.371/.471 over 684 PA, worth a total of 101 BR.  Luckily for Abreu, we’re ignoring defense for now, and this was an offensive upgrade of 12 runs or 1.2 wins.

Designated Hitter
Hideki Matsui was penciled in as the primary DH coming into 2008 and his projection was pretty good, .287/.367/.477 over 500 PA, equivalent to around 74 BR.  Unfortunately, after a hot start to the season, Matsui’s knees gave out on him and he missed a significant part of the season and when he managed to come back was very unproductive, ending 2008 with a line of .294/.370/.424 over 378 PA for a total of 50 BR.  That’s a 24 run/2.4 win falloff.

So just looking at the starting nine, we see that the Yankees projected to hit .289/.372/.465 over 4870 PA, which would have been worth 724 BR.  Instead, the starting nine hit .280/.352/.443 over 4896 PA, for a total of 653 BR.  That’s a 71 run drop off or 7.1 win drop off.

The Bench
Projecting the bench is usually tricky, but at least on paper the Yankee bench looked to be serviceable this year, with Wilson Betemit, Morgan Ensberg, Jose Molina, Shelley Duncan, Brett Gardner, Alberto Gonzalez, Nick Green, Jason Lane and Chris Woodward the likely candidates to see playing time.  I had the bench projected to hit .247/.319/.404 over 1811 PA, which would have been worth 209 BR.  Instead, the collection of Betemit, Ensberg, Posada,  Duncan, Gardner, Gonzalez, Justin Christian, Francisco Cervelli, Juan Miranda, Chad Moeller, Xavier Nady, Ivan Rodriguez, Richie Sexson, Chris Stewart and Cody Ransom hit over .244/.306/.380 over 1339 PA for a total of 140 BR. That’s a 69 run underperformance.

Clutchness
Regular watchers of the 2008 Yankees as well as regular readers of this blog also know from a variety of different methods that the Yankees underperformed with runners on base.  Using the method I like best (Fangraph’s batting runs above average based on run expectancy), here’s a look at how the Yankees’ players context neutral batting runs compared to their contextualized batting runs in 2008.

Overall, the difference was small, but I think we can all pick out several games where the Yankees failure to come up with hits in big spots cost them wins.

cnBRAA: context-neutral batting runs above average.
cxtBRAA: contextualized batting runs above average.
Diff: cxtBRAA - cnBRAA.

I don’t know how good or bad the team baserunning has been aside from stolen bases, which are already included in the batting runs above, so we’ll assume they were average.

Let’s roll all that up.

So we had a team that was supposed to score 933 runs or so.  Their starting nine created 71 fewer runs than expected, and their bench created 69 fewer than expected, for a total shortfall of around 141 runs.  Subract another three runs for unclutchness.

933 run projection - 141 actual underperformance - 3 clutchness = 789.

How many runs did the 2008 Yankees score?  789. That’s creepy, huh?

If you were to rate the biggest reasons for the Yankees’ offensive underperformance, it’d be:
1) Losing Jorge Posada (55 runs)
2) Melky Cabrera sucking ass (27 runs)
3) Hideki Matsui’s knee causing him to both miss time and to underperform when he returned (24 runs)
4) Robinson Cano becoming Wayne Tolleson (16 runs)

--Posted at 1:34 pm by SG / 73 Comments | - (227)




Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Batting Runs Above Average Using Run Expectancy

My post about contextualizing linear weights got linked over at The Book Blog, which led to a new discovery for me.  Fangraphs, which is really a wonderful site for stat dorks, tracks a version of batting runs above average that is not context-neutral.  Instead, they use the difference in run expectancy before and after every plate appearance or batters faced.  The full glossary definition is here, but here’s the heart of it. 

BRAA (batting runs above average): BRAA is the difference in run expectancy (RE) between the start of the play and the end of the play. That difference is then credited/debited to the batter and the pitcher.

What I like about this is it adds the out state to the base states I was using, and it includes pitchers, and it doesn’t give different weights based on innings or scores.  Basically, you look at what an average player adds to his team on each specific play for each of the 24 base/out states, then you compare that to what each player actually does.

Since it includes pitchers we can do direct comparisons of everyone on the team and see how they’ve stacked up this year as well.

Here’s the offense.


Here are the starting pitchers.


Here are the relievers.


And here’s everyone.


These numbers are not position-adjusted, so you may want to account for that.  Here are my 2008 AL position adjustments based on 650 PAs.

C 10
1B -5
2B 0
3B 0
SS 12
LF -4
CF -3
RF -6
DH -6

So you’d subtract around 5 runs from Giambi’s value, you’d add around 12 to Jeter’s (pro-rated).  Here’s how the overall chart looks if we position-adjust for the offensive players.


These numbers are against average, not replacement level.  Also as a reminder, a measure like this is not necessarily supposed to be predictive, it’s retroactive.

This says that in total, the Yankees have been about four wins better than average including everything except baserunning and defense, although I think the bulk of defense is included in the pitchers’ BRAA.  An average team over 151 games would be 76-75 or so, and the Yankees are 80-71, or four games better than average.

Update(s):
As requested by DaPuj, I’ve added the context neutral batting runs above average for the position players to the overall Yankee chart.

And here’s the top 25 in the AL for contextualized, position adjusted BRAA for position players.

And the bottom 25.

Lastly, adding in pitchers here’s the top 50.

--Posted at 12:08 pm by SG / 23 Comments | - (357)




Monday, August 11, 2008

Clutchness and the 2008 Yankees

In the previous thread, PhilRizzuto raised a question about how bad the Yankees have been hitting this year with runners in scoring position. I think anyone who's watched this team all season knows they've been bad even without looking at the numbers, but since I'm a stat dork, let's look at some stats.

First off, let's take a look at the 2008 Diamond Mind Projection Blowout. According to the aggregate of six different projection systems, the Yankees projected to score 924 runs this year. Losing Alex Rodriguez for a month and losing Jorge Posada obviously put a damper on that.

In addition, the run environment in the AL is down this year. Last year, AL teams averaged 4.93 runs per game and hit for a line of .271/.338/.423. This year they are averaging 4.71 runs per game and are hitting .266/.334/.416. So that's around a 4% reduction in run scoring. The standard deviation on the AL runs scored using last year's total of 11185 is 106 runs, so one standard deviation in either direction gives us 4.88 runs per game to 4.98 runs per game. Two standard deviations gives us 4.84 runs to 5.02 runs per game. So the lower AL scoring this season appears to be statistically significant.

Rank Team RF/G
1 Texas 5.61
2 Detroit 5.09
3 Chicago Sox 5.01
4 Boston 5.00
5 Minnesota 4.97
6 Baltimore 4.92
7 NY Yankees 4.82
8 LA Angels 4.73
9 Cleveland 4.66
10 Tampa Bay 4.61
11 Toronto 4.24
12 Kansas City 4.20
13 Seattle 4.12
14 Oakland 4.02


Still, the Yankees are 7th in the league in actual runs scored.

But what about the park factors you ask? Using a weighted average of 2006-2008, here's how the rankings would look (park factors from The 4 letter.com).

Rank Team PkAdj RF/G
1 Texas 5.39
2 Minnesota 5.30
3 Detroit 4.91
4 Tampa Bay 4.81
5 Chicago Sox 4.81
6 Boston 4.75
7 Baltimore 4.73
8 NY Yankees 4.66
9 LA Angels 4.61
10 Cleveland 4.60
11 Toronto 4.33
12 Seattle 4.26
13 Oakland 4.23
14 Kansas City 4.14


Either way, the Yankee offense has been mediocre this year, despite projecting to be one of the better ones in the league. They are on pace to score 781 runs, That's a falloff of almost 200 runs from last season.

According to linear weights, the context-independent batting events that the Yankee offense has accrued this year should total 586 runs. Using runs created instead of linear weights says they should have scored 598. So why have they only scored 568?

First of all, the Yankees have hit into what seems like a million double plays. The actual number is 109, which is the fourth highest total in the league. Adding those DPs into linear weights knocks the runs scored estimate down by 11 runs. But getting back to the clutch thing, The Hardball Times tracks a stat called 'clutch' coincidentally enough. Now the whole concept of clutch is murky and hard to define, so this is just one of probably a million different ways to measure it. Anyway, the definition of clutch they are using is based of the 2002 version of Bill James's runs created and is defined as:

Hits(with runners in scoring position) - (AB with RISP times BA) + HR(with runners on base) - (AB(with runners on base) times HR)/AB).

or


Clutch is expressed in terms of runs above and below average. Here's how the Yankees rate.

Tm Clutch
MIN 37
LAA 35
BAL 27
OAK 22
KC 20
CHA 14
CLE 14
TEX 12
DET -9
TOR -11
SEA -11
BOS -15
TB -18
NYA -26


I know it's hard to believe, but yes, the Yankees are the unclutchest(is that a word?) team in the AL this year. Here are the individuals and their clutch rankings.

Last, First Tm Lg Pos Clutch
Damon, Johnny NYA AL LF 7
Abreu, Bobby NYA AL RF 4.5
Gardner, Brett NYA AL LF 3.6
Christian, Justin NYA AL LF 1.8
Matsui, Hideki NYA AL DH 0.8
Sexson, Richie NYA AL 1B 0.5
Moeller, Chad NYA AL C 0.4
Jeter, Derek NYA AL SS 0.1
Stewart, Chris D NYA AL C 0
Duncan, Shelley NYA AL 1B -0.3
Posada, Jorge NYA AL C -1.2
Gonzalez, Alberto R NYA AL SS -1.3
Ensberg, Morgan NYA AL 3B -1.6
Cano, Robinson NYA AL 2B -1.7
Nady, Xavier NYA AL LF -2.1
Molina, Jose NYA AL C -3.5
Betemit, Wilson NYA AL 1B -3.9
Rodriguez, Ivan NYA AL C -5.3
Cabrera, Melky NYA AL CF -5.5
Giambi, Jason NYA AL 1B -10.3
Rodriguez, Alex NYA AL 3B -13.2


Now I'm not really going to get into the whole clutch hitting as a skill thing here. Well, maybe just for a second. This is not a measure of a player's clutch skill/ability, it's a measure of their value in the current season. Last year, Alex Rodriguez's clutch rating was +9.8. Did Madonna make him unclutch? In 2006 it was +3.2, in 2005 it -8.8.

It's definitely a problem when your two best offensive players aren't hitting with runners in scoring position though. And how the hell is Pudge -5.3 already? He's only played in like 5 games.

If we add those clutch values to the players' position-adjusted batting runs above replacement level here's how the players rank.

Last, First Tm Lg Pos PA BA OBP SLG pBRAR Clutch Total
Damon, Johnny NYA AL LF 443 .322 .392 .459 26.9 7 33.9
Rodriguez, Alex NYA AL 3B 420 .315 .402 .599 45.4 -13.2 32.2
Abreu, Bobby NYA AL RF 500 .287 .358 .467 19.2 4.5 23.7
Giambi, Jason NYA AL 1B 397 .252 .393 .517 29.5 -10.3 19.2
Jeter, Derek NYA AL SS 499 .283 .346 .398 18.9 0.1 19.0
Matsui, Hideki NYA AL DH 285 .323 .404 .458 14.5 0.8 15.3
Posada, Jorge NYA AL C 195 .268 .364 .411 8.6 -1.2 7.4
Nady, Xavier NYA AL LF 58 .365 .431 .731 8.0 -2.1 5.9
Christian, Justin NYA AL LF 39 .278 .333 .361 1.0 1.8 2.8
Sexson, Richie NYA AL 1B 30 .292 .400 .458 1.7 0.5 2.2
Moeller, Chad NYA AL C 84 .227 .310 .333 0.4 0.4 0.8
Stewart, Chris D NYA AL C 3 .000 .000 .000 -0.7 0 -0.7
Gardner, Brett NYA AL LF 68 .153 .227 .169 -4.8 3.6 -1.2
Duncan, Shelley NYA AL 1B 65 .175 .262 .281 -2.9 -0.3 -3.2
Cano, Robinson NYA AL 2B 461 .263 .300 .397 -3.1 -1.7 -4.8
Rodriguez, Ivan NYA AL C 19 .278 .316 .444 0.2 -5.3 -5.1
Gonzalez, Alberto R NYA AL SS 58 .173 .232 .212 -3.9 -1.3 -5.2
Betemit, Wilson NYA AL 1B 153 .253 .276 .411 -2.2 -3.9 -6.1
Ensberg, Morgan NYA AL 3B 80 .203 .263 .243 -5.1 -1.6 -6.7
Molina, Jose NYA AL C 237 .230 .278 .315 -4.1 -3.5 -7.6
Cabrera, Melky NYA AL CF 435 .245 .299 .341 -7.9 -5.5 -13.4


Alex Rodriguez and Jason Giambi's clutch performances hurt their value, but they still have been valuable this year, just not as valuable as the raw numbers may show. Johnny Popup isn't a bad player, but if he's your most valuable offensive performer you probably have issues. And boy, does Melky stink.

Do I think clutch hitters exist? Not really, but I do think unclutch hitters can exist, and I do think pressure can have some impact, although it's my opinion that it's not nearly as big of a deal as it's made out to be by the mass media. Also, this is just one definition of clutch, a different definiton may show something totally different, so keep that in mind.

So yeah, the 2008 Yankees have been unclutch by this measure. I'm guessing you didn't need a blog entry to know that though.
--Posted at 9:25 am by SG / 67 Comments | - (283)




Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Yankee Defense by Zone Rating through May 18, 2008

Player Pos G INN PO A E DP Ch ZR Avg ZR PM AvgPM Diff RS RS/162
Giambi, Jason 1B 31 268.2 296 13 2 26 59 .814 .867 48 51 -3 -3 -14
Duncan, Shelley 1B 8 63 59 3 1 5 8 1.000 .867 8 7 1 1 19
Ensberg, Morgan 1B 6 34 38 0 0 1 4 1.000 .867 4 3 1 0 18
Betemit, Wilson 1B 2 11 12 1 0 1 2 1.000 .867 2 2 0 0 28
Posada, Jorge 1B 1 8 7 0 0 1 3 .667 .867 2 3 -1 0 -86
Damon, Johnny 1B 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .867 0 0 0 0 0
Cano, Robinson 2B 43 364.2 86 140 4 32 151 .841 .829 127 125 2 1 5
Gonzalez, Alberto 2B 3 21 3 6 0 1 9 .778 .829 7 7 0 0 -24
Rodriguez, Alex 3B 21 178 15 47 2 6 56 .893 .800 50 45 5 4 34
Ensberg, Morgan 3B 17 124 8 30 1 2 45 .689 .800 31 36 -5 -4 -47
Gonzalez, Alberto 3B 10 53.2 5 11 1 2 14 .857 .800 12 11 1 1 17
Betemit, Wilson 3B 5 30 3 9 1 2 15 .667 .800 10 12 -2 -2 -77
Cabrera, Melky CF 42 352.2 98 2 1 0 107 .907 .901 97 96 1 0 2
Damon, Johnny CF 4 33 5 0 0 0 7 .714 .901 5 6 -1 -1 -48
Damon, Johnny LF 33 272.1 60 0 0 0 65 .892 .846 58 55 3 2 13
Matsui, Hideki LF 14 113.1 27 1 1 0 36 .694 .846 25 30 -5 -5 -58
Abreu, Bobby RF 42 353.2 77 4 1 1 94 .830 .867 78 81 -3 -3 -12
Matsui, Hideki RF 3 18 2 0 0 0 2 1.000 .867 2 2 0 0 18
Duncan, Shelley RF 3 14 2 0 0 0 2 1.000 .867 2 2 0 0 23
Jeter, Derek SS 38 328.2 45 95 4 19 113 .796 .837 90 95 -5 -3 -15
Gonzalez, Alberto SS 5 41 10 14 0 2 12 1.000 .837 12 10 2 1 52
Betemit, Wilson SS 3 16 2 6 0 1 6 .833 .837 5 5 0 0 -2


Pos: Position
G: Games
INN: Defensive Innings at Position
PO: Putouts
A: Assists
E: Errors
DP: Double Plays
Ch: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
Avg ZR: ZR by average defender at the same position and in the same league
PM: Plays Made
AvgPM: Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games

--Posted at 7:02 am by SG / 41 Comments | - (410)




Sunday, May 18, 2008

Why The Yankees Are Losing

The chart below shows the Yankees' average projections pro-rated to their actual playing time this season on the left. On the right are the actual YTD performance.

Team NYA Proj Actual
Starters POS PA AVG OBP SLG BR PA AVG OBP SLG BR Diff
Jorge Posada C 66 .293 .392 .499 11 66 .302 .333 .476 9 -2
Jason Giambi 1B 139 .256 .399 .499 23 139 .193 .345 .468 19 -3
Robinson Cano 2B 164 .312 .347 .489 24 164 .208 .256 .318 10 -13
Alex Rodriguez 3B 99 .300 .402 .569 18 99 .286 .343 .495 15 -4
Derek Jeter SS 163 .318 .388 .463 25 163 .314 .346 .431 20 -5
Johnny Damon LF 175 .286 .357 .438 24 175 .257 .341 .454 24 0
Melky Cabrera CF 158 .281 .341 .403 19 158 .262 .325 .426 19 0
Bobby Abreu RF 176 .284 .392 .461 28 176 .288 .352 .450 23 -5
Hideki Matsui DH 163 .291 .370 .489 25 163 .306 .387 .458 24 -1
Starters Total 1303 .292 .373 .471 197 1303 .287 .336 .436 163 -34
Bench POS PA AVG OBP SLG BR PA AVG OBP SLG BR Diff
Shelley Duncan 1B 41 .257 .322 .480 6 41 .194 .293 .250 3 -3
Chad Moeller C 41 .231 .287 .373 4 41 .243 .317 .378 4 0
Alberto Gonzalez SS 41 .250 .300 .351 4 41 .257 .333 .314 4 0
Jose Molina C 84 .250 .287 .375 8 84 .203 .220 .304 5 -4
Chris Stewart C 3 .250 .300 .375 0 3 .000 .000 .000 0 -1
Morgan Ensberg 3B 76 .261 .368 .467 11 76 .214 .276 .257 4 -7
Wilson Betemit SS 27 .265 .338 .443 4 27 .269 .296 .462 3 0
Bench Total 313 .256 .316 .410 36 313 .233 .275 .308 22 -14
Team Total 1616 .285 .362 .459 233 1616 .258 .325 .410 186 -48


BR here are batting runs by linear weights (not position-adjusted or compared to average). Apart from Johnny Damon and Melky Cabrera, every Yankee starter has provided less offense than projected and overall the starters are 34 runs below their expectations. The bench has also significantly underperformed to the tune of 14 runs below expectations.

The Yankees are 48 runs below expectations even accounting for the injuries to Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. That's five wins, and it at least partially explains why they are 20-23. If the offense had played as expected, they'd be 25-18, which is a 94 win pace and right around where they should have been. Offense is down in the AL by around 11% this season, but the Yankees are scoring 20% less frequently than expected so that's not the whole explanation.

The pitching and defense have not been the problem. The defense is below average but it was supposed to be. The pitching staff has been a little worse than average, but not egregiously so (-2 runs saved above average). It's the lack of offense that's killing this team. Unfortunately, I don't see any moves that can be done to fix that.

--Posted at 2:04 pm by SG / 9 Comments | - (353)




Monday, April 21, 2008

April 21 - Yankee Offense Projections vs. Actuals

So the team that I projected to score around 930 runs this year is on pace to score 689, which would rank ninth in the AL if things held up. Here's a look at each player's contributions to that.

Player pAVG pOBP pSLG pBR aAVG aOBP aSLG aBR Brdiff
Jose Molina .243 .280 .360 3 .333 .333 .528 6 3
Chad Moeller .225 .299 .348 2 .350 .435 .600 5 3
Hideki Matsui .287 .367 .477 11 .323 .405 .523 13 2
Melky Cabrera .282 .344 .406 8 .281 .353 .456 10 1
Alberto Gonzalez .253 .301 .348 2 .333 .400 .467 3 1
Morgan Ensberg .248 .365 .446 3 .333 .333 .500 3 0
Shelley Duncan .243 .311 .453 1 .200 .200 .200 0 -1
Johnny Damon .280 .353 .423 11 .215 .333 .400 10 -1
Bobby Abreu .277 .383 .439 12 .306 .367 .458 11 -1
Alex Rodriguez .300 .406 .574 16 .308 .357 .551 14 -1
Wilson Betemit .258 .333 .445 2 .154 .214 .154 0 -2
Derek Jeter .307 .379 .438 8 .309 .339 .418 7 -2
Jorge Posada .286 .380 .469 7 .261 .306 .391 5 -2
Jason Giambi .245 .387 .474 9 .109 .288 .283 5 -4
Robinson Cano .308 .348 .482 12 .169 .200 .234 2 -9
Total .280 .362 .453 107 .265 .331 .425 93 -13


pAVG: Projected batting average
pOBP: Projected on base percentage
pSLG: Projected slugging average
pBR: Projected batting runs (pro-rated to actual playing time, not position-adjusted)
aAVG: Actual batting average
aOBP: Actual on base percentage
aSLG: Actual slugging average
aBR: Actual batting runs (pro-rated to actual playing time, not position-adjusted)
Brdiff: Difference between projected batting runs and actual, pro-rated to actual playing time

There are some rounding issues in the table above so if things don't seem to add up here, trust me, they actually do in Excel. The batting runs are adjusted for actual playing time so it's a direct comparison, but no position-adjusment is included. The Yankee offense theoretically should have scored 13 fewer runs than you'd expect given the allocation of playing time and the players' projections on offense. They're actually even worse than that at 85 runs, thanks to poor hitting in the clutch primarily.

God bless Molino and Moello, or they'd be six runs worse than that. Add in the pitching staff, which has the fifth worst RA in the AL at 4.82 and has saved five fewer runs than average, and you have a 23 run deficit, which is about 2.3 wins. Not coincidentally, they sit 10-10 while log5 says they should have expected to be 11.6 - 8.4 to this point.

For all the crap Giambi's been getting, Cano is the single biggest problem on this team. He's been so bad offensively that even with the +1 defense he's played so far, his overall "value" to the team is -8 runs. Let's hope for a heat wave soon.
--Posted at 8:37 pm by SG / 34 Comments | - (384)




Friday, April 11, 2008

Worst Offense Ever Takes a Night Off

In a shocking turn of events, the Yankees managed to score a decent number of runs last night, beating the Royals 6-1. Granted, two of the runs came in the ninth inning against Hideo Nomo, who I could have sworn has been retired for a few years, but it was still good to see. Jorge Posada's HR was especially nice considering the way he has started the season off with his injury and ineffectiveness.

More important than the offensive outburst was Andy Pettitte's good pitching. Pettitte went six and two-thirds innings and allowed just one run and five hits. The Yankees really need Pettitte and Wang to do what they are projected to do this season if they want to have a shot at the postseason. it was still a save situation when Pettitte was pulled so Joba Chamberlain pitched the end of the seventh as well as the eighth. I like seeing Joba pitch more than one inning because I still think he should end up in the rotation. Mariano Rivera came in to pitch the ninth despite the Yankees adding a couple of runs, which was fine, he hadn't pitched for a few days and was already warmed up anyway. One thing that I noticed last night is Mo was throwing a lot of two-seamers. I'd like to see him continue to do that.

Now comes three games against some .500 team. Your pitching matchups for the weekend:

Friday April 11: C. Wang (2-0,1.38) vs. C. Buchholz (0-1,5.40)
Saturday April 12: M. Mussina (1-1,3.09) vs. J. Beckett (0-1,9.64)
Sunday April 13: P. Hughes (0-1,5.00) vs. D. Matsuzaka (2-0,1.47)

I hate these series, mainly because of the ridiculous hype certain media outlets try to give these games. It's an interesting set of matchups. Wang makes his first road start of the year and the Yankees haven't seen Buccholz before, so hopefully he doesn't no-hit them. Beckett's still working his way back to full strength but Moose is going to have to try to trick one of the better lineups in baseball, and who knows what either Hughes or Matsuzaka will bring on Sunday night?

Since I don't know how long this will last, here's an early meaningless and small sample size look at how the Yankee defense has performed according to zone rating so far this season.
Player Pos G INN Ch ZR PM AvgPM Diff RS RS/162
Giambi, Jason 1B 6 43 11 .818 9 10 -1 0 -15
Ensberg, Morgan 1B 3 17 3 1.000 3 3 0 0 26
Betemit, Wilson 1B 2 11 2 1.000 2 2 0 0 27
Duncan, Shelley 1B 1 9 0 .000 0 0 0 0 0
Cano, Robinson 2B 10 88 43 .837 36 36 0 0 6
Rodriguez, Alex 3B 10 87 29 .931 27 23 4 3 50
Betemit, Wilson 3B 1 1 0 .000 0 0 0 0 0
Molina, Jose C 7 55 1 1.000 1 1 0 0 4
Posada, Jorge C 4 33 1 1.000 1 1 0 0 7
Cabrera, Melky CF 8 70 21 .810 17 19 -2 -2 -31
Damon, Johnny CF 2 18 3 1.000 3 3 0 0 21
Damon, Johnny LF 6 53 9 1.000 9 8 1 1 28
Matsui, Hideki LF 3 27 7 .571 4 6 -2 -2 -90
Abreu, Bobby RF 8 70 10 .900 9 9 0 0 2
Matsui, Hideki RF 1 9 1 1.000 1 1 0 0 15
Duncan, Shelley RF 1 1 1 1.000 1 1 0 0 137
Jeter, Derek SS 7 56 26 .731 19 22 -3 -2 -54
Gonzalez, Alberto SS 2 17 5 1.000 5 4 1 1 52
Betemit, Wilson SS 2 15 5 1.000 5 4 1 1 58
Total 84 680 178 .854 152 150 2 1 21


INN: Defensive Innings at Position
Ch: Playable Chances
ZR: Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
PM: Plays Made
AvgPM: Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender
Diff: Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS: Runs Saved
RS/162: Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games

Melky's had some tough chances so I wouldn't pay much heed to his numbers yet, but I think Hideki Matsui needs to be kept out of the outfield whenever possible. For those of you thinking Alex Rodriguez is playing Gold Glove caliber defense this year, you're right.

In bad news down on the farm, Alan Horne suffered some kind of injury in his start last night and will have an MRI today. Let's hope for good news there.
--Posted at 7:58 am by SG / 40 Comments | - (409)




Thursday, April 10, 2008

Oh Where, Oh Where Has My Little Offense Gone?

While my head knows that nine games is still way too small of a sample size to draw undue distinctions from, it sure didn’t feel like it while I watched the again punchless Yankees fall to Kansas City 4-0 last night.  Granted, sometimes you run into a Roy Halladay.  Sometimes you run into A.J. Burnett. Sometimes you run into Dustin McGowan. Sometimes you run into   Andy Sonnastine. Sometimes you run into Edwin Jackson.  Sometimes you run into James Shields.  Sometimes you run into Jason Hammel.  Sometimes you run into Brian Bannister.  Sometimes you run into Zach Greinke.  But come on, ALL NINE OF THEM?

With a forecast of rain all night, Joe Girardi pulled Ian Kennedy from starting the game and went with Brian Bruney to start the game.  The reason given was so that they wouldn’t start the game with Kennedy and then lose him if the rain stopped the game.  Considering the grief Girardi got for bringing back Josh Johnson from a long rain delay when he managed the Marlins in 2006 and Johnson’s subsequent breakdown which may or not have been related, this was pretty interesting out of the box thinking.  For the most part it seemed to work well, although it likely cost the Yankees the use of Bruney and Farnsworth in today’s game.  That’s probably bad in the former case but not necessarily so in the latter case.  Kennedy ended up pitching the 6th through 8th, starting off poorly but finishing off pretty well.

The pitching didn’t really matter because the offense continued to stink.  Here’s how the Yankees rate by position-adjusted batting runs above average using linear weights to this point.

Matsui : 2
Abreu : 1.5
Rodriguez : 0.7
Molina : 0.3
Gonzalez : 0.2
Cabrera : 0.1
Ensberg : -0.5
Damon : -0.5
Duncan : -0.5
Betemit : -1
Jeter : -1.5
Posada : -1.9
Giambi : -2.4
Cano : -4.4

How is Damon not worse?  Hey Robinson, feel free to stop sucking.  How bad has Cano been?  Here are the five worst offensive players so far in the AL this season by position-adjusted BRAA:

Crawford : -4.3
Johjima : -4.3
Ortiz : -4.3
Cano : -4.4
Polanco : -4.6

Only Placido Polanco has been worse.  He’s in good company with David Ortiz and Carl Crawford at least.

Like I said, it’s still too early to panic, but it’s probably not too early to get irritated or annoyed.

--Posted at 7:53 am by SG / 43 Comments | - (371)




Saturday, March 8, 2008

Looking Ahead to 2008 - Position Player Wrapup

So now that I've gone through the position players, it's time to close out what the outlook is on a team level. To do that I've built depth charts on offense and defense which we can use as a rough gauge,

Offensively, there's little question that the Yankees are probably the most talented team in baseball. The one question that could impact that is the health of their regulars given their ages. Projections of single players are for the most part objective, but when we try to roll them up into a team-wide performance we will run into subjective issues with playing time, so keep that in mind.

This is my projected lineup for the Yankees this year. I am basing the playing time on their projected playing time with some downward adjustments for potential injuries. I am allocating total playing time based on expected outs by each player, with the assumption that the team will have 27 outs per game minus about 80 outs to account for ninth innings in home victories, so a total of 4294 outs. I didn't subtract more outs than that to account for extra innings.

The projections below are the average of five systems (CHONE, MARCEL, PECOTA, ZiPS and CAIRO). The last column (BR) is batting runs by linear weights. There are no position adjustments or comparisons to average in the batting runs calculated here, since I am looking for a total number.

Starters POS AVG OBP SLG PA Outs BR
Johnny Damon LF .280 .353 .423 585 379 78
Derek Jeter SS .307 .379 .438 600 373 86
Bobby Abreu RF .277 .383 .439 600 370 89
Alex Rodriguez 3B .300 .406 .574 650 386 123
Jason Giambi 1B .245 .387 .474 300 184 46
Jorge Posada C .286 .380 .469 500 310 76
Hideki Matsui DH .287 .367 .477 500 316 74
Robinson Cano 2B .308 .348 .482 585 381 84
Melky Cabrera CF .282 .344 .406 550 361 68
Starters Total .289 .372 .465 4870 3060 724


I can't account for the event of catastrophic injury here, so I tried to spread the injury risk among everyone with the exception of Giambi, who I'm assuming will be restricted to around 300 plate appearances. Outs are just calculated as (1 - OBP) times PA.

Here's how the bench looks.

Bench POS AVG OBP SLG PA Outs BR
Wilson Betemit 3B .258 .333 .445 350 233 46
Morgan Ensberg 1B .248 .365 .446 290 184 40
Jose Molina C .243 .280 .360 250 180 23
Shelley Duncan 1B .243 .311 .453 250 172 32
Brett Gardner OF .253 .325 .327 150 101 15
Alberto Gonzalez SS .253 .301 .348 140 98 13
Nick Green UT .246 .308 .397 129 89 14
Jason Lane OF .235 .311 .414 127 87 15
Chris Woodward UT .234 .294 .339 125 88 11
Bench Total .247 .312 .404 1811 1234 209


I have no idea if any of Jason Lane, Nick Green or Chris Woodward will see any playing time but I figure they will be stashed at Scranton so there's at least some possibility of it. What should be obvious is that the Yankees have two potentially strong bench players in Betemit and Ensberg, who both project well enough to be starters at their respective positions. That helps mitigate any potential injuries in the infield with Betemit's ability to cover any position and with Ensberg presumably able to cover 3B and 1B.

Add it up, and here's what you get.

Team Total AVG OBP SLG PA Outs BR
Starters + Bench .277 .355 .448 6681 4294 933


The sigma on a team's runs scored in a season is around 30, so that puts the Yankees in a range of 903-963 runs scored this year on paper using the projections I'm using and the playing time assumptions I'm using.

Looking at baserunning using Lee Panas's bases gained above average, here's how the players that Lee had data for did last year:

Player Team BGAA Hits BGAA Ground BGAA Air BGAA Other BGAA Total
Damon NYA 3.7 2.3 12.3 15.3 33.6
Rodriguez NYA 11.8 2.7 2.5 11.1 28.1
Abreu NYA 1.1 1.2 5.7 0.7 8.7
Jeter NYA 9 -3.6 1.3 -3 3.7
Matsui NYA 4.5 1.5 -2.3 -2.8 0.9
Cabrera NYA 4.9 2.6 -6.9 -1.4 -0.8
Cano NYA 4.6 6 -5.3 -8.7 -3.4
Giambi NYA -9.1 0.5 -1 -0.6 -10.3
Posada NYA -7.5 -5 -5.1 -0.6 -18.2
Ensberg NYA -6.3 2.8 -2.4 -0.2 -6.1
16.7 11 -1.2 9.8 36.2


A team total of 36 would be worth an additional 10 runs, but we should regress that towards average since we only have one year of data. Let's assume the Yankees will be about 5 runs better than average on the bases this year.

So we've got 933 runs at the plate and another 5 on the bases, but unfortunately, we're not quite done yet.

Projecting defense is tricky, but I'm going to take a stab at it anyway. Using zone rating projections and defensive depth charts, here's how that looks.

First up, the expected starters. A full season is about 1450 defensive innings.

Starters POS Inn Proj CH Proj ZR Proj PM Avg ZR Avg PM PMAA RSAA
Jason Giambi 1B 500 96 .796 77 .841 81 -4 -3
Robinson Cano 2B 1300 479 .833 399 .823 394 5 4
Alex Rodriguez 3B 1300 392 .758 298 .761 298 -1 -1
Derek Jeter SS 1300 487 .806 392 .825 402 -9 -7
Johnny Damon LF 1000 257 .869 223 .862 222 2 1
Melky Cabrera CF 1100 361 .898 324 .885 320 5 4
Bobby Abreu RF 1300 325 .864 280 .868 282 -1 -1
Total 13050 2397 1993 1999 -5 -4


POS: Position
Inn: Defensive innings
Proj CH: Projected chances
Proj ZR: Projected zone rating
Proj PM: Projected plays made
Avg ZR: Average projected ZR at POS
Avg PM: Average plays made
PMAA: Plays made above average
RSAA: Runs saved above average

That looks like the best defensive team the Yankees have run out there in a while, with only Giambi and Jeter as big minuses. In Giambi's case he probably won't play enough to really hurt the team, and in Jeter's case the more he plays the more he bats so I guess it's not really all that bad.

Filling in the remaining innings with bench guys, here's what I get.

Bench POS Inn Proj CH Proj ZR Proj PM Avg ZR Avg PM PMAA RSAA
Wilson Betemit 1B 400 77 .816 63 .841 65 -2 -2
Wilson Betemit 2B 80 29 .813 24 .823 24 0 0
Wilson Betemit 3B 50 15 .786 12 .761 11 0 0
Wilson Betemit SS 100 37 .793 30 .825 31 -1 -1
Shelley Duncan 1B 100 19 .834 16 .841 16 0 0
Shelley Duncan LF 50 13 .871 11 .862 11 0 0
Shelley Duncan RF 50 12 .875 11 .868 11 0 0
Jason Lane LF 50 13 .869 11 .862 11 0 0
Jason Lane CF 200 66 .833 55 .885 58 -3 -3
Jason Lane RF 100 25 .828 21 .868 22 -1 -1
Morgan Ensberg 1B 450 87 .816 71 .841 73 -2 -2
Morgan Ensberg 3B 90 27 .791 21 .761 21 1 1
Nick Green 2B 40 15 .804 12 .823 12 0 0
Nick Green SS 40 15 .825 12 .825 12 0 0
Chris Woodward 2B 30 11 .807 9 .823 9 0 0
Chris Woodward 3B 10 3 .846 3 .761 2 0 0
Chris Woodward SS 10 4 .842 3 .825 3 0 0
Hideki Matsui LF 350 90 .833 75 .862 78 -3 -2
Johnny Damon CF 150 49 .881 43 .885 44 0 0


The Yankee bench may end up hitting pretty well for a bench, but they don't look to field particularly well.

Let's add in the catchers:

Catchers Inn SB CS CS% PBWPR TER FER Tot R R/140
Posada 1022 83 31 27% -2 1 0 -4 -4
Molina 428 20 14 40% -2 0 0 -3 -8


And let's then add it all up.

Pos Inn Proj CH Proj ZR Proj PM Avg ZR Avg PM PMAA RS
1B 1450 279 .810 226 .841 235 -9 -7
2B 1450 534 .831 443 .823 439 4 3
3B 1450 438 .762 333 .761 333 1 0
SS 1450 543 .806 438 .825 448 -10 -8
LF 1450 373 .860 321 .862 321 -1 -1
CF 1450 476 .887 423 .885 422 1 1
RF 1450 362 .862 312 .868 314 -2 -2
C 1450 -7
Total 11600 3005 .831 2496 .836 2513 -17 -13


So overall, the Yankees are projecting to be about 13 runs worse than an average team defensively, which seems bad but for them is pretty good considering some of the teams that they've run out there recently.

So what do all these dorky numbers really mean? The Yankee position players project to score about 938 runs and allow 13 runs more than an average team. According to my Diamond Mind projections which should be released sometime around March 24, the average non-Yankee AL team projects to score 786 runs and be average defensively (shocking, I realize).

938 - 13 - 786 = 139

So the Yankee position players project to be about 14 wins better than an average (81 win team). Now injury or a bigger decline than projected could certainly affect those numbers, but then again a meteor could hit earth and make it all moot too. 81 + 14 = 95 wins. The next question will be whether the pitching staff is going to be able to do their part, which I'll try and answer over the next couple of weeks.

Update: In case any one wants to mess around with different playing times, I've made a spreadsheet that you can use. You can download it here. You can change the players and plate appearances on offense, and on defense you can mess around with innings and positions.

For offense, the projected outs should = the expected outs, you'll have to adjust the plate appearances to get to that. On defense, defensive innings at a position should sum up to 1450.

--Posted at 9:01 am by SG / 26 Comments | - (903)




Friday, March 7, 2008

Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Bench

We've gone through the likely starters for the 2008 Yankees, so now it's time to take a look at the guys on the bench. I won't look back at 2007 for these guys, I'll just look at what they project to do this year.

Wilson Betemit
Scott Proctor and his tattered arm were shipped to Los Angeles of Los Angeles last season to acquire Betemit. Betemit's a fairly young player who was once a highly touted prospect in the Braves' farm system. Although he's a switch-hitter, he has exhibited a very significant platoon split in his career.

Vs RHP: .268/.347/.464 in 800 PA
Vs LHP: .232/.281/.353 in 227 PA

Now, 227 plate appearances aren't enough to give us a solid window of Betemit's actual skill vs LHP. The sigma on his OPS vs lefties is .149, so we can say we can estimate his true talent OPS against lefties to be somewhere in the range of .485 - .783. So it's tough to say that Betemit is really a platoon player just yet.

Here's how Betemit's 2008 projections look. I am comparing him to the average 3B here.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 368 331 46 84 17 1 14 41 2 1 36 89 1 .254 .329 .438 -1 9
marcel 383 338 47 90 19 1 14 51 3 1 39 89 1 .266 .339 .453 2 12
pecota 265 234 31 60 13 1 9 36 2 1 27 69 1 .255 .331 .437 -1 6
zips 336 301 42 78 17 1 14 46 1 1 34 86 1 .259 .336 .462 2 11
cairo 228 200 30 51 10 1 8 27 1 1 22 51 1 .254 .326 .428 -2 4
average 316 281 39 72 15 1 12 40 2 1 32 77 1 .258 .332 .443 0 8
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 228 200 35 58 13 2 11 32 1 0 27 44 2 .290 .382 .530 9 15
65% 228 200 33 55 11 1 9 30 1 0 25 47 1 .272 .354 .479 3 9
Baseline 228 200 30 51 10 1 8 27 1 1 22 51 1 .254 .326 .428 -2 4
35% 228 200 27 47 8 0 6 24 0 1 20 54 0 .236 .298 .377 -7 -1
20% 228 200 24 44 7 0 5 22 0 2 18 58 0 .219 .270 .326 -13 -7


Betemit projects to hit about as well as an average 3B. which is pretty damn good for a backup IF.

Defensively, Betemit could see some time at first base depending on how the great Giambi experiment pans out, or in the late innings for defense, but right now his primarily role will be backing up the entire infield. He's a good bat for an infielder, but reviews are mixed on his defense. The numbers aren't great, but we have the small sample size issue to contend with.

YEAR LG Tm POS Player Name Age GP GS Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RS/162
2007 AL NYY 1B Wilson Betemit 26 14 9 74 67 4 0 9 14 18 .778 -1 -1 -18
2005 NL Atl 2B Wilson Betemit 23 1 1 8 1 3 0 0 3 3 1.000 1 0 77
2006 NL Atl 2B Wilson Betemit 24 10 9 69 26 20 0 7 17 22 .773 -1 -1 -15
2007 AL NYY 2B Wilson Betemit 26 2 2 17 3 7 0 1 6 7 .857 0 0 15
2007 NL LA 2B Wilson Betemit 26 1 1 6 1 0 0 1 0 2 .000 -2 -1 -291
2004 NL Atl 3B Wilson Betemit 22 7 4 39 2 6 0 2 7 7 1.000 2 1 47
2005 NL Atl 3B Wilson Betemit 23 63 46 431 26 94 6 6 103 124 .831 5 4 13
2006 NL Atl 3B Wilson Betemit 24 30 20 204 8 40 3 9 41 51 .804 1 1 6
2006 NL LA 3B Wilson Betemit 24 49 45 398 24 83 4 9 83 109 .761 -3 -2 -7
2007 AL NYY 3B Wilson Betemit 26 14 5 56 1 14 2 3 15 19 .789 1 0 11
2007 NL LA 3B Wilson Betemit 26 53 39 353 20 60 4 6 62 86 .721 -4 -4 -15
2004 NL Atl SS Wilson Betemit 22 11 7 75 12 30 3 5 29 35 .829 0 0 -6
2005 NL Atl SS Wilson Betemit 23 25 10 136 24 40 1 10 36 48 .750 -4 -3 -36
2006 NL Atl SS Wilson Betemit 24 18 10 92 20 33 5 10 27 40 .675 -6 -5 -75
2007 AL NYY SS Wilson Betemit 26 8 4 39 9 9 1 2 8 9 .889 1 0 17
2007 NL LA SS Wilson Betemit 26 2 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 1 1.000 0 0 26
Projection 1B 14 9 223 67 4 0 9 14 18 .778 0 0 0
Projection 2B 4 4 92 10 10 0 3 8 10 .791 -2 -2 -27
Projection 3B 43 32 896 17 59 4 6 62 79 .779 -1 0 -1
Projection SS 15 7 239 15 26 2 6 23 30 .750 0 0 -3


I debated including the defensive numbers for any of the bench candidates since there are sample size issues, but I'll present them with the caveat that there is not enough data to make any definitive assessment of what they may tell us. I'd say Betemit is a decent glove at third and first and probably a bit stretched in the middle infield although he can handle it. Betemit's a lock to be on the roster, and for good reason. He could very well be the best backup infielder in baseball.

Jose Molina
After the Wil Nieves Experience™ got to be too much, the Yankees picked up Molina mid-season from the hated Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for Jeff Kennard. Molina's not a good hitter, but that's why he's a backup catcher. Here are his projections for 2008, prepare to be underwhelmed.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 267 254 28 61 13 1 6 30 2 1 12 57 1 .240 .277 .370 -3 3
marcel 326 299 30 74 17 1 6 34 3 1 17 64 2 .247 .285 .371 -2 4
pecota 170 155 14 37 8 0 3 18 2 1 9 36 1 .240 .278 .346 -3 1
zips 203 194 17 47 10 0 3 23 2 0 8 44 1 .242 .276 .340 -4 1
cairo 222 203 21 49 11 0 4 24 2 0 12 43 1 .242 .281 .362 -2 2
average 238 221 22 54 12 0 4 26 2 1 12 49 1 .242 .279 .358 -3 2
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 222 203 25 56 14 1 6 29 3 0 15 37 3 .276 .333 .450 7 12
65% 222 203 23 53 12 1 5 26 2 0 14 40 2 .259 .307 .406 2 7
Baseline 222 203 21 49 11 0 4 24 2 0 12 43 1 .242 .281 .362 -2 2
35% 222 203 18 46 9 0 3 21 1 1 10 47 1 .224 .254 .318 -7 -3
20% 222 203 16 42 7 0 2 19 0 1 8 50 0 .207 .228 .274 -12 -7


Pray for Jorge Posada's continued good health, although to be fair Molina's defense might make him worthy of a roster spot.

Year Last First Tm Lg Inn SB CS CS% PBWPR TER FER Tot R R/140
2004 Molina Jose LAA AL 524 23 19 45% 1 1 0 6 14
2005 Molina Jose LAA AL 480 19 18 49% -3 0 0 2 6
2006 Molina Jose LAA AL 603 27 19 41% -5 0 -2 -4 -8
2007 Molina Jose LAA AL 323 18 7 28% 0 -1 0 -2 -8
2007 Molina Jose NYA AL 169 13 5 28% 0 1 0 1 6
Projection Molina Jose NYA AL 428 20 14 40% -2 0 0 -3 -8


Molina projects to be below average defensively, mainly due to a poor projection on passed balls and wild pitches. His throwing and error rate are about average. Maybe he can recover some of that 2004 defensive magic.

Although Francisco Cervelli has had a couple of promising seasons in the minors, Molina's probably got his spot on the bench locked up this year.

Morgan Ensberg
Ensberg is coming off a very disappointing season after hitting 59 HRs and walking 186 times combined over 2005 and 2006. His performance was attributed at least partially to a shoulder injury. If that was indeed the case and he is healthy now, he has a lot of upside as not just a bench player, but as a potential starting first baseman. Here's how Ensberg projects for 2008 as compared to an average 1B.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 420 356 54 86 16 1 15 46 2 2 61 82 3 .242 .357 .419 -3 8
marcel 412 346 56 87 17 1 17 54 3 3 59 81 3 .251 .362 .454 1 12
pecota 277 229 38 57 11 1 12 38 2 1 42 57 2 .249 .367 .457 2 9
zips 475 395 60 96 18 1 20 59 1 3 76 105 4 .243 .371 .446 1 14
cairo 431 363 56 93 18 1 18 58 2 3 62 77 3 .255 .366 .459 2 14
average 403 338 53 84 16 1 16 51 2 2 60 81 3 .248 .365 .447 0 12
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 431 363 63 102 22 3 22 65 3 1 70 68 5 .282 .411 .538 17 29
65% 431 363 59 97 20 2 20 62 3 2 66 73 4 .268 .388 .499 10 22
Baseline 431 363 56 93 18 1 18 58 2 3 62 77 3 .255 .366 .459 2 14
35% 431 363 52 88 16 1 16 54 1 4 58 82 2 .242 .344 .419 -6 6
20% 431 363 48 83 13 0 14 50 1 5 54 86 1 .229 .321 .379 -14 -2


Again, we don't know how healthy he is, but the projections are pretty encouraging and there is some upside here.

Also of note are Ensberg's career splits. Versus lefties he has hit .284/.406/.530 in his career over 686 PA, compared to .258/.350/.456 versus righties. Even in his down 2007 he hit .257/.345/.486 versus lefties.

Ensberg's primarily played 3B in his career, but I think he should be reasonably competent at first base because of that infield experience. Here are his career defensive numbers at 3B.

YEAR LG Tm POS Player Name Age GP GS Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RS/162
2002 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 27 43 37 328 28 76 8 5 80 110 .727 -5 -4 -16
2003 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 27 111 89 818 77 184 9 18 195 248 .786 6 5 9
2004 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 28 118 103 921 80 164 13 23 180 243 .741 -7 -6 -9
2005 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 29 148 147 1286 100 296 15 31 324 403 .804 5 4 5
2006 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 30 117 106 975 80 230 12 25 247 301 .821 11 9 13
2007 NL Hou 3B Morgan Ensberg 32 68 52 492 36 107 11 12 118 161 .733 -6 -5 -15
2007 NL SD 3B Morgan Ensberg 32 12 10 93 3 29 1 3 29 32 .906 4 3 53
3B 102 91 2474 67 183 11 20 198 252 .786 2 1 1


I'd worry about how Ensberg may handle scooping throws, but other than that I think anyone that can play an average 3B should at the very least be average at 1B. Couple that with a bat that projects around average and with a tendency for lefty-mashing, and Ensberg seems like a good guy to have on the bench as well.

Shelley Duncan
The man, the myth, the legend. Duncan scuffled around the minors for most of his career until breaking through in 2007 and getting a shot at the majors as a 27 year old rookie. Duncan slammed 7 HRs in 74 MLB at bats and ended the season with a line of .257/.329/.554. Duncan's projections for 2008 aren't very good because of his lackluster performance in the minors before 2007.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 465 425 58 98 19 1 21 60 2 2 36 113 4 .231 .297 .428 -11 2
marcel 242 215 35 58 10 1 10 34 3 1 22 45 2 .270 .339 .465 0 7
pecota 460 412 51 98 19 1 21 70 3 1 39 112 4 .239 .308 .439 -7 5
zips 446 405 45 98 18 1 24 74 1 2 38 103 3 .242 .312 .469 -4 9
cairo 369 334 44 84 16 1 19 58 0 0 30 77 2 .250 .316 .477 -2 9
average 396 358 48 88 16 1 19 59 2 1 33 88 3 .246 .314 .456 -4 7
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 369 334 51 93 20 2 24 66 1 0 36 69 4 .278 .360 .560 12 23
65% 369 334 47 88 18 1 22 62 0 0 33 73 3 .264 .338 .518 5 16
Baseline 369 334 44 84 16 1 19 58 0 0 30 77 2 .250 .316 .477 -2 9
35% 369 334 41 79 14 0 17 55 0 1 28 82 2 .236 .294 .435 -9 2
20% 369 334 37 74 12 0 15 51 0 1 25 86 1 .223 .272 .393 -16 -5


I think Duncan may be better than what those numbers show because I think he made some adjustments in his game that allowed him to play like he did in 2007. I can see him as a .250/.320/.480 type hitter with HR power, and that's a damn fine bench player.

Defensively, we don't have much data on Duncan, but the scouting reports see him as a below average defender at either first base or the OF corners.

Jason Lane
Lane's a long-shot to make the roster. He's a similar player to Shelley Duncan, but 3 years older and with a couple of bad seasons in his recent past (.201/.318/.392 in 2006 and .175/.254/.345 in 2007). Despite being a righty he doesn't have a huge platoon split (.768 OPS vs RPH, .779 vs LHP). His projections for 2008, as you may imagine, are a little ugly.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 407 363 48 87 18 1 14 46 2 2 40 74 4 .240 .322 .410 -8 3
marcel 332 294 39 68 14 1 13 44 3 2 30 63 3 .231 .304 .418 -7 2
pecota 321 285 35 66 14 1 11 43 4 1 28 61 3 .232 .302 .404 -8 1
zips 434 391 46 90 20 1 15 56 2 2 38 88 5 .230 .306 .402 -11 1
cairo 342 302 39 74 16 1 13 46 2 1 32 62 3 .245 .319 .434 -4 5
average 367 327 41 77 16 1 13 47 3 2 34 69 4 .236 .311 .413 -8 2
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 342 302 45 83 20 2 17 53 3 0 38 54 5 .274 .365 .518 9 18
65% 342 302 42 78 18 2 15 49 3 1 35 58 4 .259 .342 .476 2 12
Baseline 342 302 39 74 16 1 13 46 2 1 32 62 3 .245 .319 .434 -4 5
35% 342 302 36 70 14 1 11 43 1 2 29 66 2 .231 .295 .392 -11 -2
20% 342 302 33 65 12 0 9 39 1 2 26 70 1 .217 .272 .350 -18 -9


Defensively, Lane does have the ability to play CF which Duncan does not. However, he doesn't grade well defensively if you believe zone rating.

YEAR LG Tm POS Player Name Age GP GS Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RS/162
2004 NL Hou 1B Jason Lane 27 3 1 13 13 1 1 3 2 2 1.000 0 0 27
2006 NL Hou 1B Jason Lane 29 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0
2002 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 26 1 1 12 4 0 0 0 4 4 1.000 1 0 53
2003 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 26 6 2 23 2 0 0 0 2 4 .500 -1 -1 -78
2004 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 27 17 3 49 8 0 0 0 7 10 .700 -2 -1 -39
2005 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 28 6 4 37 11 0 0 0 11 13 .846 0 0 -13
2006 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 29 5 1 17 5 0 0 0 5 6 .833 0 0 -15
2007 NL Hou CF Jason Lane 31 36 27 261 80 2 0 1 77 88 .875 0 0 0
2007 NL SD CF Jason Lane 31 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1.000 0 0 137
2002 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 26 11 1 22 4 0 0 0 4 4 1.000 1 0 28
2003 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 26 3 1 14 3 0 0 0 3 3 1.000 0 0 33
2004 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 27 35 6 102 24 2 1 0 22 24 .917 1 1 16
2005 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 28 4 3 24 3 0 0 0 3 7 .429 -3 -3 -153
2006 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 29 6 1 23 6 0 0 0 6 6 1.000 1 1 43
2007 NL Hou LF Jason Lane 31 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0
2002 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 26 27 16 151 39 3 1 1 39 49 .796 -4 -4 -35
2003 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 26 2 0 6 2 0 0 0 2 2 1.000 0 0 51
2004 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 27 24 13 141 28 0 0 0 27 31 .871 0 0 1
2005 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 28 137 126 1116 225 4 6 0 203 248 .819 -13 -11 -14
2006 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 29 89 73 679 155 1 0 0 149 183 .814 -11 -9 -19
2007 NL Hou RF Jason Lane 31 18 15 128 43 0 0 0 40 47 .851 -1 -1 -13
2007 NL SD RF Jason Lane 31 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0
Projection AL NYY 1B 32 2 0 17 7 0 0 1 1 1 1.000 0 0 0
Projection AL NYY CF 32 16 9 285 28 1 0 0 27 31 .859 -4 -3 -17
Projection AL NYY LF 32 9 2 86 6 0 0 0 6 7 .843 -4 -4 -62
Projection AL NYY RF 32 57 48 1314 98 1 1 0 91 111 .823 -6 -5 -5


I'd have a tough time building a case for Lane over Ensberg or Duncan, unless the Yankees need an OF more than they need a backup corner IF.

Nick Green
The triumphant return of a Yankee legend. Green's the prototypical utility player. He projects to be bad on offense.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 388 358 43 85 16 2 12 44 3 3 25 101 5 .237 .296 .394 -9 1
marcel 216 189 27 45 9 1 4 19 3 2 19 49 4 .238 .315 .360 -5 0
pecota 457 410 47 97 21 2 12 51 6 4 34 129 6 .237 .300 .385 -10 1
zips 370 341 36 88 17 2 11 38 3 3 25 90 4 .258 .316 .416 -4 6
cairo 265 237 30 63 11 2 7 28 2 1 18 57 4 .266 .321 .418 -2 5
average 339 306 37 76 15 2 9 35 3 3 25 83 5 .247 .310 .395 -6 3
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 265 237 35 71 14 3 10 33 3 0 22 49 6 .299 .374 .511 10 16
65% 265 237 33 67 13 3 8 31 3 1 20 53 5 .283 .348 .464 4 10
Baseline 265 237 30 63 11 2 7 28 2 1 18 57 4 .266 .321 .418 -2 5
35% 265 237 27 59 9 1 6 25 1 2 16 61 3 .249 .294 .371 -8 -1
20% 265 237 24 55 8 1 4 23 1 2 14 65 2 .232 .267 .325 -14 -7


He can play pretty much any infield position, although not necessarily all that well.

YEAR LG Tm POS Player Name Age GP GS Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RS/162
2006 AL NYY 1B Nick Green 27 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1.000 0 0 194
2004 NL Atl 2B Nick Green 25 75 61 572 137 203 8 44 187 222 .842 4 3 8
2005 AL TB 2B Nick Green 26 91 83 731 141 195 4 44 186 240 .775 -11 -8 -16
2006 AL TB 2B Nick Green 27 4 4 32 7 8 0 3 7 9 .778 0 0 -14
2006 AL NYY 2B Nick Green 27 19 11 103 37 29 1 6 26 35 .743 -3 -2 -30
2007 AL Sea 2B Nick Green 29 2 1 8 2 2 0 1 1 1 1.000 0 0 24
2004 NL Atl 3B Nick Green 25 5 0 12 0 2 0 0 2 2 1.000 0 0 0
2005 AL TB 3B Nick Green 26 13 11 104 4 21 3 2 23 30 .767 0 0 -2
2006 AL NYY 3B Nick Green 27 17 8 80 7 18 2 4 19 27 .704 -2 -1 -25
2006 AL TB SS Nick Green 27 10 7 67 10 21 0 6 22 28 .786 -1 -1 -17
2006 AL NYY SS Nick Green 27 10 3 35 10 11 2 4 11 15 .733 -1 -1 -42
2007 AL Sea SS Nick Green 29 3 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 2 1.000 0 0 65
Projection AL NYY 1B 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1.000 0 0 0
Projection AL NYY 2B 38 32 853 63 85 2 19 79 99 .799 -2 -2 -3
Projection AL NYY 3B 13 7 213 4 15 2 2 16 22 .739 -1 0 -3
Projection AL NYY SS 6 3 86 5 9 0 2 9 12 .795 0 0 -8


Green is probably the best choice if the Yankees decide they want a second backup middle infielder, although if they carry 12 pitchers that may make it tough to squeeze him on.

Chris Woodward
Take Nick Green and make him worse and make him a few years older and you have Chris Woodward.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 242 222 23 52 11 1 3 22 1 1 19 51 1 .234 .298 .333 -9 -3
marcel 301 268 32 64 13 1 5 29 2 1 24 61 2 .239 .299 .351 -10 -2
pecota 84 75 8 18 4 0 1 8 1 0 7 17 1 .240 .310 .333 -3 0
zips 179 165 18 37 8 1 2 16 1 0 13 40 1 .224 .285 .321 -8 -3
cairo 238 212 23 49 10 1 3 22 1 0 18 48 1 .231 .286 .330 -10 -4
average 209 188 21 44 9 1 3 19 1 0 16 43 1 .234 .295 .334 -8 -2
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 238 212 28 56 13 2 5 27 2 0 22 41 2 .264 .337 .412 0 6
65% 238 212 25 53 12 2 4 24 2 0 20 45 2 .248 .311 .371 -5 1
Baseline 238 212 23 49 10 1 3 22 1 0 18 48 1 .231 .286 .330 -10 -4
35% 238 212 21 46 8 1 2 20 1 0 16 51 1 .215 .260 .289 -14 -8
20% 238 212 18 42 7 0 1 17 0 0 14 55 0 .198 .234 .248 -19 -13


Woodward has seen some spot duty in the OF which could theoretically give him an edge on Green.

YEAR LG Tm POS Player Name Age GP GS Innings PO A E DP PM CH ZR PMAA RSAA RS/162
2002 AL Tor 1B Chris Woodward 26 3 1 10 9 0 0 1 2 2 1.000 0 0 37
2005 NL NYM 1B Chris Woodward 29 34 21 199 206 10 2 16 30 33 .909 1 1 7
2006 NL NYM 1B Chris Woodward 30 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0
2007 NL Atl 1B Chris Woodward 31 6 4 35 28 1 1 3 7 8 .875 0 0 6
2002 AL Tor 2B Chris Woodward 26 6 3 26 8 14 2 4 11 13 .846 0 0 6
2005 NL NYM 2B Chris Woodward 29 5 3 30 4 7 2 1 7 10 .700 -1 -1 -41
2006 NL NYM 2B Chris Woodward 30 39 33 292 72 93 4 20 76 91 .835 2 1 7
2007 NL Atl 2B Chris Woodward 31 11 6 54 12 16 0 4 15 23 .652 -4 -3 -70
2002 AL Tor 3B Chris Woodward 26 2 1 9 2 3 0 0 4 4 1.000 1 1 121
2005 NL NYM 3B Chris Woodward 29 6 2 25 1 11 0 0 12 13 .923 2 1 79
2006 NL NYM 3B Chris Woodward 30 11 6 66 3 17 0 2 16 16 1.000 3 3 60
2007 NL Atl 3B Chris Woodward 31 24 6 100 5 16 3 2 13 16 .813 1 1 7
2002 AL Tor SS Chris Woodward 26 79 77 678 134 231 13 64 208 240 .867 4 3 7
2003 AL Tor SS Chris Woodward 27 103 98 871 161 300 17 69 279 335 .833 -3 -3 -4
2004 AL Tor SS Chris Woodward 28 64 60 515 87 171 5 42 163 195 .836 -1 0 -1
2005 NL NYM SS Chris Woodward 29 7 3 33 5 7 1 1 6 7 .857 0 0 3
2006 NL NYM SS Chris Woodward 30 13 11 97 13 33 1 10 29 35 .829 0 0 -2
2007 NL Atl SS Chris Woodward 31 13 5 67 7 20 2 5 17 20 .850 0 0 7
Projection AL NYY 1B 11 7 192 63 3 1 5 10 11 .901 0 0 2
Projection AL NYY 2B 18 14 362 29 38 2 8 32 40 .788 -1 -1 -4
Projection AL NYY 3B 14 5 196 3 14 1 1 13 15 .905 2 2 12
Projection AL NYY SS 31 26 712 40 79 4 20 73 87 .839 0 0 0


Woodward brings a slightly better glove than Green it would appear, but a worse bat. He's probably not a good bet to make the team although I have a hunch he could sneak his way on with a hot spring.

Brett Gardner
Gardner's a long shot to start the season in the Bronx. He's shown pretty good OBP skills in the minors and he's supposed to be top of the scouting scale fast, but he has no power at all which is not a good sign for his major league future.

Projection PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
chone 469 427 55 108 18 4 2 43 35 9 40 91 2 .253 .320 .328 -13 -1
marcel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0 0
pecota 483 428 58 102 17 4 3 31 25 7 44 100 3 .238 .308 .318 -18 -5
zips 468 417 73 112 15 4 1 27 28 9 49 87 2 .269 .348 .331 -10 2
cairo 325 292 46 74 11 3 3 23 9 3 30 61 2 .253 .326 .342 -9 -1
average 349 313 43 79 12 3 2 25 19 5 33 68 2 .253 .326 .330 -10 -1
CAIRO % PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BRAA BRAR
80% 325 292 53 83 14 5 5 28 12 1 35 53 3 .283 .374 .413 3 11
65% 325 292 50 78 13 4 4 25 11 2 33 57 3 .268 .350 .378 -3 5
Baseline 325 292 46 74 11 3 3 23 9 3 30 61 2 .253 .326 .342 -9 -1
35% 325 292 43 70 9 2 2 21 8 4 27 65 1 .239 .302 .307 -16 -7
20% 325 292 39 65 8 1 1 18 6 5 25 69 1 .224 .278 .272 -22 -13


Gardner's defense is apparently not as good as it should be with his speed because of some questionable reads, but I think he's still likely to be a plus defender.

Conclusion
We can probably assume the Yankees start the season with this lineup:

LF - Damon
SS - Jeter
RF - Abreu
3B - Rodriguez
1B - Giambi
C - Posada
DH - Matsui
2B - Cano
CF - Cabrera

We can probably also safely assume that they'll start the season with a 12 man pitching staff, which leaves four roster spots for the bench. Betemit and Molina are locks. I think Ensberg is pretty close to a lock as well, which leaves one spot for Jason Lane or Shelley Duncan or Nick Green or Chris Woodward. Duncan gives them the better bat, although Green and Woodward give them more infield flexibility. Lane is probably the best OF backup defensively since he can play CF, but he seems like the odd man out. If it was me I'd go with Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. Any situation that would require Green or Duncan could be handled without them. If you lose Alex Rodriguez, Ensberg or Betemit can play third. If you lose one of Jeter or Cano, Betemit can cover them. If you lose both Jeter and Cano, Betemit slides to second, Rodriguez to short, and Ensberg to third. If it's a long-term issue the Yankees would have Alberto Gonzalez available to backup around the IF.

The Yankees have similar OF flexibility with Damon as the backup CF, Matsui as the backup corner OF and emergency CF, and Duncan as a fifth OF who can cover the corners in a pinch.

I suppose a pinch runner for Giambi or Posada would be nice, but is that worth a roster spot? If it is I could see Gardner or Justin Christian sneaking on.

I'll take a look at what the Yankee position players add up to as far as runs and wins in my next entry and then it's on to the pitching.

So, like I said, my bench would be Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. There's a possibility Hideki Matsui may start the year on the DL which would open up another spot, but let's assume that's not the case for now. If you could take four players for the Yankee bench, who would they be?
--Posted at 8:46 am by SG / 23 Comments | - (698)




Sunday, November 18, 2007

CAIRO vs. CHONE - 2008 Yankees edition

While we all wait breathlessly for Mariano Rivera to sign his contract, I noticed that Sean Smith posted his CHONE hitter projections over at his blog. I'm still messing around with my own CAIRO projections so I thought it'd be a good exercise for me to compare what the two say for the Yankees since it now appears the offense is basically set for 2008.

And here's what that looks like:

CAIRO CHONE
Starters POS PA AVG OBP SLG BR AVG OBP SLG BR
Johnny Damon LF 600 .286 .357 .438 83 .275 .351 .413 78
Derek Jeter SS 600 .318 .388 .463 92 .299 .373 .433 84
Bobby Abreu RF 600 .284 .392 .461 94 .268 .375 .422 84
Alex Rodriguez 3B 600 .300 .402 .569 112 .303 .420 .588 117
Hideki Matsui DH 600 .291 .370 .489 92 .282 .365 .473 88
Jorge Posada C 600 .293 .392 .499 98 .285 .389 .475 93
Robinson Cano 2B 600 .312 .347 .489 87 .305 .347 .479 86
Wilson Betemit 1B 400 .265 .338 .443 52 .254 .329 .438 51
Melky Cabrera CF 600 .281 .341 .403 72 .278 .342 .397 72
Starters Total 5200 .293 .371 .474 783 .284 .367 .457 754
Bench POS PA AVG OBP SLG BR AVG OBP SLG BR
Jason Giambi DH 350 .256 .399 .499 57 .246 .392 .474 55
Shelley Duncan 1B 325 .257 .322 .480 44 .235 .301 .452 40
Jose Molina C 225 .250 .287 .375 22 .241 .281 .360 20
Alberto Gonzalez SS 175 .250 .300 .351 16 .247 .295 .335 15
Bronson Sardinha RF 150 .230 .293 .376 15 .240 .305 .388 16
Brett Gardner CF 100 .262 .333 .357 11 .253 .320 .328 10
Bench Total 1325 .251 .331 .427 166 .243 .323 .408 157
AVG OBP SLG BR AVG OBP SLG BR
Team Total 6525 .284 .363 .464 949 .276 .358 .447 911


BR is batting runs using linear weights. I used the same amount of projected playing time for every single player and assumed 6525 plate appearances (last year's team had about 6550). I also factored in about 20% bench playing time.

What this data shows is that CAIRO is a lot more optimistic than CHONE, to the tune of a 38 run overall difference. My guess is that Sean is using a harsher aging factor than I am or regressing more towards the mean, or perhaps a combination of the two. The difference isn't huge on a player by player basis, but it's fairly significant overall.

Dan Szymborski's ZiPS for the Yankees are up too but since he doesn't have them in a spreadsheet yet I didn't look at how CAIRO compares yet. I'd guess ZiPS will be harsher than CHONE, but I feel pretty comfortable that the Yankees will score 900+ runs next season.

I've also updated the RLYW Lineup Toy with the CHONE projection data.

My posting may be sporadic over the next week or so as I'm heading on vacation but hopefully someone will fill in.
--Posted at 8:28 pm by SG / 63 Comments | - (1415)




Tuesday, October 9, 2007

2007 ALDS: Yankee Run Values

Player PA AVG OBP SLG OPS BRAA DRAA TRAA
R Cano 16 .333 .375 .800 1.175 1 0 1
S Duncan 4 .500 .500 .500 1.000 0 0 0
A Rodriguez 17 .267 .353 .467 .820 0 0 0
M Cabrera 16 .188 .188 .375 .563 -1 1 0
B Sardinha 0 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 0 0
J Damon 19 .278 .316 .611 .927 1 -1 0
H Matsui 16 .182 .438 .182 .620 0 0 0
J Giambi 4 .250 .250 .250 .500 0 0 0
D Mientkiewicz 8 .000 .143 .000 .143 -1 0 -1
J Posada 17 .133 .235 .200 .435 -2 0 -2
B Abreu 17 .267 .353 .533 .886 1 -4 -3
D Jeter 17 .176 .176 .176 .352 -2 -1 -3


BRAA: Batting runs above average by linear weights
DRAA: Defensive runs saved above average by linear weights
TRAA: BRAA + DRAA

Player IP H HR BB SO RA ERA RSAA
A Pettitte 6.3 7 0 2 5 0.00 0.00 3
M Rivera 4.7 2 0 1 6 0.00 0.00 3
P Hughes 5.7 3 1 0 6 1.59 1.59 2
K Farnsworth 1.0 1 0 0 2 0.00 0.00 1
M Mussina 4.7 4 0 4 3 3.86 3.86 1
J Veras 0.7 1 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0
R Villone 0.3 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0
J Chamberlain 3.7 3 0 3 4 4.91 4.91 0
L Vizcaino 0.7 2 0 2 0 13.50 13.50 -1
R Clemens 2.3 4 1 2 1 11.57 11.57 -2
R Ohlendorf 1.0 4 1 1 0 27.00 27.00 -2
C Wang 5.7 14 3 4 2 19.06 19.06 -9


RSAA: Runs saved above average

Player TRAA
A Pettitte 3
M Rivera 3
P Hughes 2
R Cano 1
K Farnsworth 1
M Mussina 1
J Veras 0
S Duncan 0
A Rodriguez 0
R Villone 0
M Cabrera 0
B Sardinha 0
J Chamberlain 0
J Damon 0
H Matsui 0
J Giambi 0
L Vizcaino -1
D Mientkiewicz -1
J Posada -2
R Clemens -2
R Ohlendorf -2
B Abreu -3
D Jeter -3
C Wang -9
Total -13


TRAA: TRAA/RSAA
--Posted at 7:59 am by SG / 120 Comments | - (1529)




Thursday, September 27, 2007

Picking the 2007 Postseason Roster

Now that the Yankees are officially in the playoffs, I can finally talk about the postseason roster.  With the injuries to Carl Pavano, Darrell Rasner, Humberto Sanchez, and Andy Phillips, the Yankees basically have the flexibility to use anyone they want from their 40 man roster.  Here’s a look at the candidates, with the players on the bubble separated out.

Starting Pitchers(4)
Andy Pettitte
Roger Clemens
Chien-Ming Wang
Mike Mussina

Relief Pitchers(5)
Mariano Rivera
Joba Chamberlain
Phil Hughes
Kyle Farnsworth
Luis Vizcaino

On the Bubble
Chris Britton
Brian Bruney
Tyler Clippard
Matt DeSalvo
Chase Wright
Jose Veras
Ron Villone
Sean Henn
Kei Igawa
Jeff Karstens
Ian Kennedy
Ross Ohlendorf
Edwar Ramirez

Catchers(2)
Jose Molina
Jorge Posada

Infielders(5)
Robinson Cano
Derek Jeter
Doug Mientkiewicz
Alex Rodriguez
Wilson Betemit

On the Bubble
Alberto Gonzalez

Outfielders (5)
Bobby Abreu
Melky Cabrera
Johnny Damon
Shelley Duncan
Hideki Matsui

On the Bubble
Bronson Sardinha

Designated Hitters(1)
Jason Giambi

There are 22 players I consider locks to make the roster, four starting pitchers, five relievers, two catchers, five infielders, five outfielders, and one DH.  That gives the Yanks three slots to fill.  If it were up to me, I’d take two more pitchers and one position player. 

The position player seems like an easy choice to me, if choosing between Alberto Gonzalez or Bronson Sardinha I’d take the more valuable defensive player.  Either can pinch-run, but Gonzalez gives the Yankees a little more depth in case of multiple injuries to their starting infielders.

The pitching situation is a little less clear-cut.  Phil Hughes slots in as a long reliever, but the rest of the choices are mainly short relievers and that’s a concern with a gimpy Roger Clemens and Mike “Box of Chocolates” Mussina taking two starts.  Because of this, one of the extra relievers should probably be someone who can pitch multiple innings.  Out of the players on the bubble, the best choices for that kind of role in my mind are Kei Igawa or Ron Villone.  Neither inspires much confidence, but we have to remember that you don’t have to win every single game in the playoffs, you just have to win 3 or 4 before your opponent does.  If Clemens can’t go past the second inning, odds are the game is lost but you don’t want to have to burn out your bullpen either.  The off days built into the schedule mitigate that to some degree.  The other thing the Yankees should do is break up Pettitte and Wang.  Since they’ll be starting on the road, I’d start Pettitte in game one, Clemens in game two, and Wang in game three at home.  However, to be safe I think the Yankees should take Igawa.  I know he hasn’t been good this year, but he could come into a game in the early innings and pitch 5 or 6 innings and put the Yankees in a position to win the next game.  Now all the readers can proceed to tell me I’m insane.

That leaves one other pitcher to take.  Ian Kennedy’s hurt so scratch him.  Realistically it comes down to taking one of Chris Britton, Brian Bruney, Jose Veras, Villone, Ross Ohlendorf or Edwar Ramirez.

Britton - had success in the AL East last year and did well in AAA this season.  For whatever reason he doesn’t seem to be well-regarded by the organization right now, and his stuff isn’t really that great for a short reliever.

Bruney - You know the deal with this guy.  Great fastball, horrendous command.

Veras - See Bruney, although with a slightly better breaking pitch.  I swear I have not seen Veras hit the catcher’s target on a single pitch yet this season.

Villone - Chock full of veterany-goodness.  Hasn’t been horrible this year, but his control scares the hell out of me and he has a very high likelihood to implode in any given outing.

Ohlendorf - He’s looked pretty good so far in the majors, but it’s only been three innings.  He’s got good stuff but his minor league numbers are pretty bad, but he was injured for much of the year and converted from a starter to a reliever so that should be considered.

Ramirez - I was pulling like hell for Edwar to come up the majors and succeed, but he still needs to work on his approach IMO.  Until he can consistently get ahead in the count and make optimal use of his killer changeup, I wouldn’t have any faith in him in a tight spot.  He does have strikeout ability (29 Ks in 19.3 innings), but he also has giving up HR ability (6 in 19.3 innings).  He’s probably pitched himself off the postseason roster at this point.

Not a very inspiring bunch.  I’d imagine we’ll get a healthy dose of all of these guys over the last four games of the year to see if one becomes a hot hand.  I find Ohlendorf the most intriguing of this group, so he’d probably be my pick.

I’d like to see what other people would do instead of me, so let’s hear it…

--Posted at 8:08 am by SG / 67 Comments | - (1723)




Saturday, August 18, 2007

Lineup Permutations

With Jason Giambi back in the fold, the Yankees have a problem now. It's not a bad problem, because having more talent than you have spots for is a good thing. The key will be using the talent on hand in the way that is most likely to help you win games.

This is not as clear-cut as the numbers that will follow may make it seem, because you're dealing with egos, over/under performances, possible injuries and fatigue, and many other factors(base clogging, chemistry of the lineup,etc.,). However, since I don't have any way to quantify any of that, I'm just going to look at the data that is available to me and see how the different options shake out.

For offense, I'm using a runs created formula that multiplies OBP times SLG times .92. This is then multiplied by 4.4 PA per player, which is the average PA per game for the Yankees's lineup. This doesn't consider lineup order. OBP and SLG are 2/3 based on the players' projections coming into 2007 and 1/3 based on their YTD performance. For Shelley Duncan I've included his MLEs so his stats aren't skewed by his small sample size MLB performance to this point. Since no one projected Duncan coming into the season, here's the projection I used for him:

Year Team Last First G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K BA OBP SLG
2005 Trenton Duncan Shelley 142 521 76 113 23 1 27 71 43 147 .216 .277 .422
2006 Tre-Col Duncan Shelley 104 384 43 88 21 0 18 51 31 91 .230 .287 .426
2007 Scranton Duncan Shelley 91 325 53 88 17 1 23 66 38 88 .271 .350 .537
2007 Yankees Duncan Shelley 17 42 9 13 0 0 6 13 5 12 .310 .383 .738
Projection 109 416 59 106 26 1 25 67 43 109 .255 .325 .501


I just figured out my own versions of Duncan's MLEs (major league equivalencies) then weighed each season to get a .325 OBP and .501 SLG, which doesn't seem out of line.

For defense, I'm using a combination of career defense as rated by zone rating combined with YTD 2007 performance as far as runs saved per game. For players with small sample size I made some assumptions based on scouting reports and my visual observations. I realize this turns what is supposed to be an objective exercise into a somewhat subjective one, but I think that the logic I used here is at least somewhat sound.

So the numbers that follow are the overall runs created on offense and the runs saved above/below average on defense for a single game. Multiply by 162 if you want to see how that translates to a full season.

Let's first look at the lineup that had become the basic lineup of choice prior to Giambi's return.

Pos Player RC Def
1B Phillips .537 .037
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Matsui .741 -.062
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Damon .620 .000
Off 5.469 -.015
Over 162 886 -2
Per Game 5.454


We'd expect this lineup to score 5.469 runs per game using the runs created formula I'm using assuming 40 plate appearances per game. We'd expect them to be .015 runs below average defensively per game. So net, offense plus defense this lineup is worth 5.454 runs per games. Over a full season, we'd expect them to score around 886 runs and be around 2 runs above average on defense. Bear in mind that Melky's projection coming into the year was a little a low and that his YTD performance would be worth .684 RC for ever 4.4 plate appearances. If we swap that out with his .575 combined projection you get an extra 17 runs over a full season. However, as much as I'd like to that, that's not objective analysis, so the projection stays as is with the understanding that it's possibly not indicative of a likely change in Melky's talent level (or a decline by Damon which makes him worse than projected).

So, let's look at a few other combinations.

First up, let's just swap out Damon for Giambi.

Pos Player RC Def
1B Phillips .537 .037
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Matsui .741 -.062
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Giambi .818 .000
Off 5.668 -.015
Over 162 918 -2
Total 5.653


No impact on the defense obviously, but over a full season it'd be about a 30 run upgrade on offense.

How about Damon at first and Giambi at DH? To make this work I assumed that Damon would be a slightly below average defensive 1B, but not too bad of one. I have no idea if that's a reasonable assumption or not.

Pos Player RC Def
1B Damon .620 -.006
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Matsui .741 -.062
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Giambi .818 .000
Off 5.751 -.059
Over 162 932 -10
Total 5.692


It's too bad this isn't a realistic option, because it's better than the first two. Unfortunately, it likely isn't or we'd have seen it already.

We also have to consider Wilson Betemit and Shelley Duncan in the mix. How about Duncan at first and Giambi at DH?

Pos Player RC Def
1B Duncan .659 -.059
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Damon .620 -.003
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Giambi .818 .000
Off 5.668 -.052
Over 162 918 -8
Total 5.616


We don't have enough data to have a good read on Duncan's defense at first although the consensus is it's not good, so I gave him a rating equivalent to a -10 over a full season.

Another option is, Betemit at first, Giambi still at DH.

Pos Player RC Def
1B Betemit .612 -.006
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Matsui .741 -.062
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Giambi .818 .000
Off 5.743 -.059
Over 162 930 -10
Total 5.684


We have a winner. According to these numbers, this is the best combination the Yankees can run out there if Damon at first is not an option, at least against righties. The nice thing is that since Betemit doesn't hit lefties they could use Duncan against lefties. I'd also assume that Betemit is a better defender at first base than Duncan, although without enough data to know I made him touch below average for this exercise.

The Yankees can also use Duncan in the OF corners although he's supposedly going to be pretty bad out there.

The best defensive team is probably the one below.

Pos Player RC Def
1B Phillips .537 .037
2B Cano .686 .077
3B Rodriguez .900 .073
SS Jeter .721 -.164
LF Damon .620 -.003
CF Cabrera .588 .042
RF Abreu .677 -.018
DH Giambi .818 .000
Off 5.547 .044
Over 162 899 7
Total 5.591


For all the crap Andy Phillips has been getting lately, offense plus defense he's not really that big of a problem.

There are way too many potential combinations for me to run through in this space, so I've uploaded the spreadsheet that I used for this if you want to play around with it yourselves. Just select a player's name and you'll get a pulldown which lets you change the player and their values will fill in automatically.

There are 39 games left in the season. I'd try to use the Duncan/Betemit platoon at first in at least half of them. I'd use Damon to rest Melky, Abreu, and Matsui once a week, and I'd save Andy Phillips for late inning defense. The nice thing about the current Yankee bench is they can rest almost anyone on the team without losing a ton of value. It seems to me that the main thing the Yankees have to avoid is starting Phillips at first base on the same day they start Damon at DH. If they avoid that, they'll be putting a pretty strong lineup out there no matter what combination they use. Except for House Money day of course.

--Posted at 8:07 pm by SG / 16 Comments | - (970)



Page 1 of 1 pages: