Tuesday, December 1, 2009
2009 Yankees Season in Review: Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the Defense
As requested, here’s a look at how Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the overall team defense did compared to their projections.
After a 2008 season that saw him get to AA, Cervelli was still probably off the radar for 2009 despite a brief cameo at the end of 2008. However, injuries forced him into the picture, and he ended up getting 101 PAs. Here are his projections entering 2009, pro-rated to those 101 PAs.
| francisco cervelli | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 101 | 92 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 25 | .223 | .296 | .304 | 53 | .268 | .174 | .221 | .315 | .362 | 95.3% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 101 | 90 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 18 | .272 | .337 | .422 | 82 | .321 | .221 | .271 | .370 | .420 | 114.2% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 24 | .229 | .300 | .335 | 60 | .277 | .182 | .229 | .324 | .372 | 98.5% |
| 2009 tht projection | 101 | 91 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 18 | .236 | .315 | .321 | 59 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.1% |
| 2009 zips projection | 101 | 90 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 18 | .236 | .317 | .304 | 56 | .281 | .186 | .234 | .329 | .377 | 100.2% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 101 | 91 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 21 | .240 | .314 | .326 | 61 | .284 | .188 | .236 | .332 | .380 | 101.2% |
| 2009 average projection | 101 | 90 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 21 | .239 | .313 | .335 | 62 | .286 | .190 | .238 | .334 | .382 | 101.8% |
| 2009 actuals | 101 | 94 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | .298 | .309 | .372 | 55 | .281 | .185 | .233 | .329 | .376 |
Cervelli had shown pretty good plate discipline in the minors, but it deserted him in the majors. Despite that, he was able to come fairly close to his projected OBP because he hit six more singles. That also explains why he was able to exceed his SLG by a fair amount.
The .298 average is nice, but it was sort of empty, and it's doubtful he'll be able to replicate the same type of performance in 2010 if he has to rely on hitting .298 to do it. The good news is he should walk a little more and he's still going to be just 24, so he has room for growth in his offensive game. While it's probably unlikely he'll be more than a backup, he should be a decent one, especially if the good defense he showed in 2009 carries forward.
Sort of like Cervelli, Ramiro Pena hadn't gotten past AA prior to 2009, and he hadn't really impressed there either, slugging a monstrous .297 in 2008 for Trenton. Pena's calling card isn't his bat though, it's his glove. In a surprise, he made the Yankees on opening day as a backup IF, since Alex Rodriguez was out rehabbing his hip and the only other backup IF on the roster was Angel Berroa.
Because of Pena's unimpressive minor league resume, his projections were unimpressive.
| ramiro pena | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | SB | CS | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | BR/650 | wOBA | -2 Std | -1 Std | +1 Std | +2 Std | % |
| 2009 chone projection | 121 | 113 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 25 | .233 | .284 | .297 | 48 | .258 | .173 | .215 | .300 | .342 | 86.7% |
| 2009 marcel projection | 121 | 110 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 20 | .224 | .272 | .320 | 50 | .255 | .170 | .212 | .297 | .339 | 85.7% |
| 2009 pecota projection | 121 | 108 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 16 | .223 | .285 | .286 | 47 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .339 | 85.8% |
| 2009 tht projection | 121 | 113 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 22 | .224 | .276 | .291 | 45 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .294 | .336 | 84.8% |
| 2009 zips projection | 121 | 114 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16 | .224 | .269 | .263 | 39 | .240 | .158 | .199 | .282 | .323 | 80.9% |
| 2009 cairo projection | 121 | 112 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 21 | .232 | .282 | .290 | 46 | .255 | .171 | .213 | .297 | .340 | 85.9% |
| 2009 average projection | 121 | 112 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 20 | .227 | .278 | .291 | 46 | .252 | .168 | .210 | .295 | .337 | 85.0% |
| 2009 actuals | 121 | 115 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 20 | .287 | .317 | .383 | 71 | .297 | .208 | .253 | .342 | .386 |
Like Cervelli, Pena hit more and walked less than expected. However, he did show a little more pop than projected, with two extra doubles. Obviously when we're dealing with sample sizes like this we shouldn't try to infer too much about what it means going forward, but Pena's final line in 2009 was better than replacement level, and would have made him about a win better than replacement level on offense if he had done it over 650 PAs.
So, how about the Yankee defense?
Since I started blogging in 2004, there's been one recurring theme with the Yankees. Their defense has generally been bad to awful. While you can hit and pitch well enough to overcome that, it can be frustrating to watch players not making plays other players can make.
When the Yankees let Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi go and replaced them with Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher, that alone looked like a pretty decent defensive upgrade. Here's how the defense projected heading into 2009 compared to what they actually ended up doing.
| Player | Pos | pZR | pUZR | pRAA | zRSAA | uRSAA | aRSAA | diff |
| Jorge Posada | C | -5 | -10 | -5 | ||||
| Jose Molina | C | 2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -4 | ||
| Francisco Cervelli | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Kevin Cash | C | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
| Mark Teixeira | 1B | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -4 | 2 | -1 |
| Juan Miranda | 1B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robinson Cano | 2B | 2 | -2 | 0 | -2 | -5 | -3 | -4 |
| Alex Rodriguez | 3B | -2 | -1 | -2 | -6 | -9 | -7 | -6 |
| Cody Ransom | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | -4 | -4 | -4 |
| Angel Berroa | 3B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -1 | -1 |
| Melky Cabrera | CF | 2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -1 | -1 |
| Brett Gardner | CF | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| Johnny Damon | LF | -1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -9 | -5 | -6 |
| Freddy Guzman | LF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Swisher | RF | 1 | 1 | 1 | -4 | -1 | -3 | -4 |
| Eric Hinske | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Xavier Nady | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 |
| Shelley Duncan | RF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Derek Jeter | SS | -5 | -5 | -5 | -2 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| Ramiro Pena | SS | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | -2 | -27 | -25 |
pZR: Projected runs saved above average according to zone rating, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pUZR: Projected runs saved above average according to UZR, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pRAA: Average of pZR and pUZR
zRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to zone rating
uRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to UZR
aRSAA: Average of zRSAA and uRSAA
diff: aRSAA - pRAA (negative means worse than projected)
The Yankee defense actually didn't play as well as projected, with the primary culprits being Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. Cody Ransom and Angel Berroa's contributions also didn't really help. On the plus side, Derek Jeter was seven runs better than projected and Brett Gardner was two runs better.
Last year's team was about 40 runs below average, so at the very least they were better than that.
Interestingly, I completely forgot to do a season review for Mark Teixeira and Alex Rodriguez, so I'll post that next, then Mo's and then that should wrap up the backwards-looking stuff for now.
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Breaking Down Jose Molina
Well, I'm back from my vacation, and I see that yup has a request for me, namely to see how Jose Molina compares to the typical backup catcher.Molina is not a very good hitter, which I think we all know. The question is, will he a decent backup when you factor in offense and defense?
The average major league starting catcher this year (all players listed as catchers that lead their team in PA) is hitting .261/.319/.404. This translates to being about 9 runs below the average hitter over 650 plate appearances (using linear weights). So we already know that catcher is a weak offensive position.
| Role | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BR/650 |
| Starters | 2200 | 8508 | 7702 | 870 | 2013 | 411 | 23 | 215 | 1045 | 53 | 24 | 624 | 1274 | .261 | .319 | .404 | .723 | -9 |
| Backups | 1281 | 3747 | 3370 | 338 | 792 | 160 | 8 | 64 | 373 | 7 | 12 | 271 | 716 | .235 | .294 | .344 | .638 | -23 |
BR/650 - Batting runs using linear weights above average, pro-rated to 650 plate appearances.
It becomes even more apparent when you look at the backups how weak it is. The average backup catcher is hitting .235/.294/.344. Over 650 plate appearances that makes the average backup catcher 23 runs worse offensively than the average hitter.
So what can we expect from Flying Molina brother #2? He's having a bad year this season, hitting .224/.242/.288, which would be equivalent to -43 runs offensively over a full season. However, when you compare that to Wil Nieves, it looks a lot better, as Nieves's performance to this point would be -64 runs over 650 plate appearances.
We shouldn't just use this year's performance because of the small sample size. So I ran Molina through Dan Szymborski's handy-dandy ZiPS in-season projection tool, which revises a player's projection based on their YTD performance while still including their past performance.
| Molina | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BR/650 |
| Projection | 212 | 199 | 18 | 48 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 45 | .241 | .288 | .357 | .645 | -22 |
| Year-to-Date | 128 | 125 | 9 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 30 | .224 | .242 | .288 | .530 | -44 |
| Rest-of-Year | 88 | 83 | 7 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 19 | .241 | .284 | .337 | .621 | -27 |
| Total | 216 | 208 | 16 | 48 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 49 | .231 | .259 | .308 | .567 | -37 |
| Nieves | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | K | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BR/650 |
| Projection | 338 | 326 | 33 | 82 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 41 | .252 | .284 | .344 | .628 | -28 |
| Year-to-Date | 66 | 61 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | .164 | .190 | .230 | .420 | -65 |
| Rest-of-Year | 102 | 99 | 10 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | .242 | .272 | .343 | .615 | -31 |
| Total | 165 | 160 | 16 | 34 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 22 | .212 | .241 | .300 | .541 | -44 |
Doing this, Molina is projected to hit a lofty .241/.284/.337 over the remainder of the season. Doing the same with Nieves gives a line of .242/.272/343. As bad as Molina's line looks, that's just about what an average backup catcher would do. However, the upgrade over Nieves is minimal, around a run, but this assumes that Nieves can get closer to his projection over the remainder of the season, which is something I'd have my doubts about.
Of course, we have to remember defense as well. Molina's got a good rep as a defender, and prior to 2007 his defensive stats were pretty good. I only have his defense from 2002, but he didn't play much from 1999-2001 anyway.
| Yr | Name | TM | AGE | G | GS | Inn | PO | A | E | DP | PB | SB | CS | CS% | RS |
| 2002 | Jose Molina | ANA | 27 | 29 | 24 | 210.0 | 155 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 0.38 | 0 |
| 2003 | Jose Molina | ANA | 28 | 53 | 39 | 332.0 | 221 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 7 | 0.28 | 0 |
| 2004 | Jose Molina | ANA | 29 | 70 | 57 | 524.3 | 441 | 37 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 23 | 22 | 0.49 | 6 |
| 2005 | Jose Molina | ANA | 30 | 65 | 53 | 480.3 | 409 | 40 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 19 | 20 | 0.51 | 6 |
| 2006 | Jose Molina | ANA | 31 | 76 | 71 | 603.3 | 502 | 50 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 27 | 20 | 0.43 | 2 |
| 2007 | Jose Molina | ANA | 32 | 40 | 37 | 323 | 283 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 0.28 | -2 |
Molina's been a plus defender for most of his career. We don't have enough data to make a definitive assessment about Nieves, but this year he's been about a -2, and thrown out a lower percentage of base stealers than Molina (22.2%).
Basically, this looks like a minimal upgrade, but given the track records of the people involved, getting Molina gives the Yankees more certainty about what they can expect out of the backup catcher slot going forward. At the cost of Jeff Kennard, a 26 year old reliever still pitching in AA, it's probably worth it.
Nieves seems like a nice and popular guy in the clubhouse, so I feel a little for him, but like Joe Torre and Brian Cashman said on the post-game show yesterday, you have to do whatever you can to make the team better. I think this move does that, and I wish Nieves luck wherever he ends up.
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
2007 Yankee Defense at the All Star Break
Wrapping up my All Star Break review of the Yankees so far, here's how their defense rates by zone rating. If you want to read a good explanation about zone rating, you should read this article by Chris Dial, but I am going to run through an example as well, to try and clarify exactly what the numbers that will follow mean.I could pick on Derek Jeter, but I'm not going to go there. Instead I'm going to look at the brightest spot on the Yankee defense so far, Robinson Cano. We all know Cano's been a disappointment on offense, but let's look at his defense.
To help clarify the numbers I'm about to run through, here's the Stats Inc. Zone Rating grid, with the 2B area of responsiblity highlighted.

Any ball hit in that highlighted area that is converted into an out at least 50% of the time is considered a fieldable chance for a second baseman. This is based on observation by Stats Inc. scorers, but there are three people scoring these at every game and they score them independently to help cut down on subjectivity.
When a fielder has a ball hit into their zone of responsiblity, they are given a fieldable chance, which is the denominator in ZR. When they convert that into an out, it's considered a play made. When a fielder makes a play that is not his defined zone, it gets added to his chances and plays made so they get credit for it. The question is if they get enough credit for doing so, which is one limitation of zone rating. Another limitation is the zones of responsiblity are fixed, and do not account for positioning. This is a limitation when trying to assess a player's actual talent, but as far as their value in any given time, I don't think it's much of one. If a player is not put into position to make more plays than he is, that means they are not as valuable to their team as they should be, regardless of who is responsible for the positioning.
ZR is expressed as a three digit decimal from 0 to 1, and it's just plays made divided by fieldable chances. So if a player has 10 fieldable chances hit into his defined zone and converts 8 of them into outs, his ZR is .800. Plays are either made or not made in ZR. If a player makes an error, it's no worse than if their range never let them get to the ball in the first place.
So let's get back to Cano. Cano has played 84 games this season, and 747 defensive innings at second base. He has seen 274 fieldable chances, and has a ZR of .880. So we multiply his fieldable chances by .880 to get his plays made, which is 241.
The next thing we do is multiply the chances that Cano has had times the average ZR, to get an average plays made. This assumes that the types of chances a player faces over the course of a period are the same, and it's not necessarily true. Players could have stretches where they face easier chances or more difficult chances, which is why you will see players' defensive numbers fluctuate from season. Again, I consider this a limitation when trying to assess a player's ability, but not their value. This is the type of thing that should even out over time, which makes multi-year zone rating a decent gauge of a player's defensive talent.
In the American League, the average 2B has a ZR of .831. I separate the leagues because I've noticed systemic differences in the infields, and I assume it's at least partly due to pitchers "hitting." So, using the .831 avg ZR times Cano's 274 chances, we get an average plays made of 228. We subtract this from Cano's actual plays made to get a difference. 241 - 228 = 13, so Cano has converted 13 more plays into outs than average. This difference is then multiplied by the average run value of a play at that position, which was calculated by Dial and is based on the linear weights values of the single or XBH that the play would turn into if it is not made, as well as the marginal value of the out that was not recorded.
Here are the run values for the average plays at each position.
POS RV
1B: .798
2B: .754
3B: .800
CF: .842
LF: .831
RF: .843
SS: .753
For 2B, the average play is worth .754 runs, so we multiply that by Cano's +13 plays made and get a runs saved above average of 10. To calculate this over a full season, you just divide the runs saved by the innings played and multiply by 1440 innings.
Credit for this methodology goes to Chris Dial and his article Dr. StrangeGlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Zone Rating and to Chone Smith and his article Tweaking Zone Rating. Without them breaking zone rating down this clearly for me I never would have been able to understand it.
The same basic idea is used for figuring out all players except pitchers and catchers, and here are the numbers for the Yanks.
| Player | TM | LG | Pos | G | GS | INN | PO | A | E | DP | Ch | PM | ZR | Avg ZR | AvgPM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Cano, Robinson | NYY | AL | 2B | 84 | 84 | 747 | 178 | 271 | 6 | 78 | 274 | 241 | .880 | .831 | 228 | 13 | 10 | 19 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | NYY | AL | 3B | 83 | 83 | 724 | 63 | 149 | 5 | 15 | 207 | 168 | .812 | .762 | 158 | 10 | 8 | 16 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | CF | 59 | 48 | 445 | 154 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 166 | 152 | .916 | .889 | 148 | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | LF | 18 | 16 | 142 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 31 | .912 | .872 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 3B | 7 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | .900 | .762 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 45 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | SS | 8 | 2 | 36.2 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 16 | .889 | .824 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 35 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | RF | 4 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1.000 | .859 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 48 |
| Cabrera, Melky | NYY | AL | RF | 4 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | .859 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Giambi, Jason | NYY | AL | 1B | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | .842 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Basak, Chris | NYY | AL | 3B | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | .762 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 91 |
| Posada, Jorge | NYY | AL | 1B | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | 1B | 3 | 0 | 4.1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nieves, Wil | NYY | AL | 1B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phillips, Andy | NYY | AL | 3B | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .762 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | CF | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .889 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Basak, Chris | NYY | AL | SS | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .824 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thompson, Kevin | NYY | AL | LF | 4 | 1 | 13.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | .833 | .872 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -21 |
| Phillips, Andy | NYY | AL | 1B | 13 | 10 | 90.1 | 85 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 16 | 13 | .813 | .842 | 13 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 2B | 2 | 2 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6 | .750 | .831 | 7 | -1 | 0 | -41 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | LF | 3 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | .667 | .872 | 3 | -1 | -1 | -57 |
| Phelps, Josh | NYY | AL | 1B | 29 | 20 | 162.2 | 167 | 9 | 3 | 16 | 27 | 22 | .815 | .842 | 23 | -1 | -1 | -5 |
| Abreu, Bobby | NYY | AL | RF | 84 | 81 | 720 | 156 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 183 | 156 | .852 | .859 | 157 | -1 | -1 | -2 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | LF | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | .333 | .872 | 3 | -2 | -1 | -215 |
| Damon, Johnny | NYY | AL | CF | 41 | 38 | 318 | 106 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 119 | 104 | .874 | .889 | 106 | -2 | -1 | -7 |
| Mientkiewicz, Doug | NYY | AL | 1B | 48 | 36 | 330.1 | 353 | 14 | 2 | 46 | 59 | 47 | .797 | .842 | 50 | -3 | -2 | -9 |
| Cairo, Miguel | NYY | AL | 1B | 21 | 17 | 155.1 | 161 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 42 | 32 | .762 | .842 | 35 | -3 | -3 | -25 |
| Matsui, Hideki | NYY | AL | LF | 68 | 67 | 586.1 | 131 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 152 | 127 | .836 | .872 | 132 | -5 | -5 | -11 |
| Jeter, Derek | NYY | AL | SS | 84 | 83 | 726.1 | 128 | 246 | 13 | 69 | 295 | 227 | .769 | .824 | 243 | -16 | -12 | -24 |
| Total | 678 | 601 | 5345.2 | 1765 | 748 | 42 | 261 | 1633 | 1370 | .839 | .840 | 1371 | -1 | -1 | -2 |
Legend
INN - Innings
PO - Putouts
A - Assists
E - Errors
DP - Double plays
Ch - Fieldable chances
PM - Plays made
ZR - Zone Rating
AvgZR - Average ZR
AvgPM - Average PM
Diff - PM minus AvgPM
RS - Runs saved
RS/162 - Runs saved pro-rated to 162 games
So yeah, Cano's been great. Also great, Alex Rodriguez, who has rebounded from two sub-par years at third after a solid 2004 defensively. Melky's flashing a plus glove in LF and CF and this doesn't even include his arm.
The rest of the numbers seem to match my observations pretty well, although I'd have pegged Abreu to be a little worse and Matsui to be a bit better. This is part of the reason I've grown fond of zone rating. It's freely available, it's easy to convert to runs, and for the most part the players I think are good and bad defenders show up as such in ZR.
These numbers are not meant to be an absolute assessment of either a players' defensive ability or value. First of all, we're dealing with a small sample size. The difference between Jeter being average or horrible is about one play a week. Second of all, as I've listed above, there are limitations in zone rating which need to be acknowledged and understood. Over at Bronx Banter the other day there was a heated discussion about defensive metrics and their pros and cons. The way I described it to someone over there is this. Let's say you have a group of hitters, and the only thing you know about him is their batting averages. Would you prefer to use your visual observations of the players' abilities and whether they have good at bats, or would you rather use batting average to determine their skill at least partially, even acknowledging that batting average has limitations? That's kind of where I think defensive metrics should fall into place.
For catchers, I use a combination of passed balls and stolen base percentage. It's not a great method because pitchers deserve some of the blame for stolen bases, but again, if we think of it in terms of value instead of ability it's better than nothing.
| NAME | GP | GS | INN | TC | PO | A | E | DP | FPCT | PB | SB | CS | CS% | CERA | RS | RS/150 |
| Jorge Posada, NYY | 77 | 68 | 621 | 427 | 394 | 30 | 3 | 2 | .993 | 3 | 61 | 19 | 0.24 | 4.42 | -3 | -7 |
| Wil Nieves, NYY | 21 | 18 | 142 | 105 | 99 | 5 | 1 | 1 | .990 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 0.23 | 4.12 | -1 | -5 |
| Josh Phelps, NYY | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Posada's defense has typically been average or slightly below, but he was great last year. He's back below average this year, but he's hitting more than well enough to compensate. Wil Nieves has a wonderful smile, which is apparently all he needs to have to be the Yankees' backup catcher.
With the pitching, offense and defense all assessed it's time to see where everyone on the Yankees ranks in terms of overall value, so here you go.
| Last | BR | DR | PR | TR |
| Rodriguez | 33 | 8 | 42 | |
| Wang | 18 | 18 | ||
| Posada | 19 | -3 | 16 | |
| Bruney | 8 | 8 | ||
| Cano | -2 | 10 | 8 | |
| Myers | 7 | 7 | ||
| Clemens | 6 | 6 | ||
| Matsui | 8 | -5 | 4 | |
| Rivera | 3 | 3 | ||
| Villone | 3 | 3 | ||
| Jeter | 15 | -12 | 2 | |
| Pettitte | 2 | 2 | ||
| Hughes | 2 | 2 | ||
| Britton | 2 | 2 | ||
| Giambi | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Proctor | 1 | 1 | ||
| Cabrera | -5 | 5 | 1 | |
| Mussina | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ramirez | 0 | 0 | ||
| Phillips | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Basak | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rasner | -1 | -1 | ||
| Thompson | -1 | 0 | -1 | |
| Pavano | -1 | -1 | ||
| Henn | -1 | -1 | ||
| Farnsworth | -1 | -1 | ||
| Bean | -2 | -2 | ||
| Wright | -3 | -3 | ||
| Vizcaino | -3 | -3 | ||
| Desalvo | -3 | -3 | ||
| Phelps | -3 | -1 | -4 | |
| Clippard | -4 | -4 | ||
| Karstens | -5 | -5 | ||
| Damon | -4 | -3 | -6 | |
| Cairo | -5 | -2 | -7 | |
| Abreu | -6 | -1 | -7 | |
| Nieves | -7 | -1 | -8 | |
| Mientkiewicz | -6 | -2 | -8 | |
| Igawa | -13 | -13 | ||
| Total | 38 | -6 | 15 | 47 |
BR = Batting runs
DR = Defensive runs
PR = Pitching runs
TR = Total runs
I'd take Bruney and Myers's high ranking with a big grain of salt. It may be better to use a linear weights type formula for relievers' value to the team since ERA or RA can hide their performances with inherited runners.
I was surprised to see that Cano's defense makes him such a plus contributor, but I guess that's the case at least by this methodology. If you want to get angry, you can figure out how much the "contributions" of Abreu, Mientkiewicz and Igawa have cost the team this year.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Yankee Offense at the All Star Break
I'm going to use the All Star Break to explain a little bit about the way I rank players' offensive values. As most regular readers know, I'm a big fan of linear weights.The concept for linear weights was introducted by Pete Palmer in his ground-breaking book, The Hidden Game of Baseball. In a nutshell, linear weights assigns a marginal value to just about every event that can happen on the baseball field, both good and bad. You can incorporate batting, baserunning, defense, etc., to really look at the overall contribution that a player is providing to his team.
Instead of getting too heavy into the mechanism of LWTS, I'd just point anyone that is interested in the guts behind it to this link. Today I'm just going to focus on the offensive portion of the Yankees' linear weights.
The formula I use was refined by Tango Tiger and uses the following weights:
Batting Runs(BR) = (.47 x H) + (.38 x 2B) + (.55 x 3B) + (.93 x HR) + (.33 x (BB + HBP)) + .22 x SB + (-.38 x CS) + (-.1 x (AB - H))
The one change I make is I add GDP into the outs factor (AB - H). You could also add reaching on errors although I tend to ignore that out of simplicity.
Anyway, unless a player is really bad, they will have a positive value for BR, because any positive contribution creates some kind of run value. The only Yankee with a negative BR is Wil Nieves, and he's only at -1.
Once you have a players BR, you can do a couple of things. The first thing is to compare them to the average batter, regardless of position. This is useful for just figuring out the net value of a player, and for when you want to look at moving players around the different positions, as well as for direct comparisons.
The other thing that you can do, is position-adjust the players. As should be fairly obvious to most baseball fans, the average shortstop does not hit as well as the average first baseman (unless it's the Yankees), so offense from the shortstop position is harder to find, and therefore more valuable. So what I do is calculate the BR at every defensive position. I then divide BR by plate appearances, and I subtract the average BR/PA from a player's BR/PA, and then multiply by the number of plate appearances that the player has had. This tells you how much better a player has been compared to an average player over the same playing time.
Let's run through an example with Derek Jeter. Jeter's raw BR this season so far is 60. Divided by his plate appearances, he creates .152 BR/PA. The average AL SS has created 596 BR this eason, over 5194 PA, a BR/PA of .115. So Jeter's position-adjusted batting runs above average would be (.152-.115) x his PA, which comes out to about 15 runs above the average AL SS this year. That makes him the third most valuable offensive Yankee this season, behind Alex Rodriguez (the most valuable offensive player in the league regardless of position by linear weights), and Jorge Posada.
So, here are the Yankees' offensive players sorted by most valuable in position-adjusted batting runs.
| Last | pBRaa | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | K | BA | OBP | SLG |
| Rodriguez | 33 | 85 | 380 | 319 | 79 | 101 | 21 | 0 | 30 | 86 | 47 | 71 | .317 | .413 | .665 |
| Posada | 19 | 82 | 331 | 291 | 46 | 95 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 48 | 34 | 61 | .327 | .399 | .505 |
| Jeter | 15 | 85 | 395 | 348 | 57 | 117 | 23 | 3 | 5 | 44 | 35 | 47 | .336 | .408 | .463 |
| Matsui | 8 | 73 | 316 | 274 | 46 | 75 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 53 | 36 | 38 | .274 | .358 | .464 |
| Giambi | 1 | 45 | 179 | 149 | 19 | 39 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 25 | 35 | .262 | .380 | .436 |
| Phillips | 0 | 15 | 43 | 38 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6 | .316 | .381 | .474 |
| Basak | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 |
| Thompson | -1 | 11 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | .200 | .294 | .333 |
| Cano | -2 | 85 | 350 | 328 | 40 | 90 | 24 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 15 | 52 | .274 | .314 | .427 |
| Phelps | -3 | 36 | 88 | 80 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 19 | .263 | .330 | .363 |
| Damon | -4 | 76 | 313 | 273 | 44 | 67 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 38 | 42 | .245 | .339 | .344 |
| Cabrera | -5 | 76 | 299 | 265 | 31 | 73 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 22 | 33 | .276 | .331 | .385 |
| Cairo | -5 | 44 | 111 | 99 | 9 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 16 | .263 | .308 | .323 |
| Mientkiewicz | -6 | 50 | 141 | 124 | 17 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 16 | .226 | .292 | .379 |
| Abreu | -6 | 85 | 375 | 322 | 59 | 85 | 16 | 2 | 5 | 41 | 44 | 65 | .264 | .352 | .373 |
| Nieves | -7 | 22 | 53 | 50 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5 | .120 | .154 | .120 |
pBRaa = position-adjusted batting runs above average
Some more numbers that you may or may not find interesting:
| Last | HBP | GDP | SB | CS | P/PA | BA/BIP | LD% | GB% | HR/F | BA/RISP | BR | BRaa | pBR/150 |
| Rodriguez | 9 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 3.8 | .333 | 18.2% | 41.5% | 29.4% | .303 | 81 | 33 | 57 |
| Posada | 3 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 3.8 | .395 | 22.7% | 42.1% | 11.0% | .274 | 55 | 14 | 37 |
| Jeter | 8 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 3.6 | .380 | 20.8% | 55.7% | 7.1% | .427 | 60 | 10 | 24 |
| Matsui | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4.1 | .290 | 15.8% | 48.3% | 12.8% | .268 | 45 | 6 | 17 |
| Giambi | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4.4 | .302 | 19.1% | 28.7% | 11.7% | .318 | 26 | 3 | 5 |
| Phillips | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3.7 | .355 | 21.9% | 43.8% | 9.1% | .500 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| Basak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .000 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | N/A | 0 | 0 | -147 |
| Thompson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2 | .375 | 25.0% | 12.5% | 0.0% | .500 | 2 | -1 | -26 |
| Cano | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3.3 | .313 | 15.2% | 53.3% | 6.9% | .214 | 41 | -3 | -4 |
| Phelps | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 | .322 | 21.3% | 36.1% | 7.7% | .280 | 9 | -2 | -24 |
| Damon | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 4.4 | .276 | 17.3% | 51.9% | 7.0% | .238 | 36 | -3 | -8 |
| Cabrera | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3.7 | .308 | 19.7% | 55.7% | 7.1% | .234 | 33 | -4 | -10 |
| Cairo | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3.7 | .317 | 13.6% | 42.0% | 0.0% | .303 | 11 | -3 | -29 |
| Mientkiewicz | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3.7 | .233 | 23.9% | 36.7% | 9.3% | .200 | 14 | -4 | -28 |
| Abreu | 3 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 4.2 | .325 | 21.5% | 45.4% | 5.8% | .239 | 45 | -2 | -11 |
| Nieves | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 | .133 | 13.3% | 53.3% | 0.0% | .214 | -1 | -8 | -83 |
BR is the raw batting run total as I mentioned before, BRaa is batting runs above the average player without any position-adjustments, and pBR/150 is position-adjusted batting runs per 150 games. That really hammers home how bad Wil Nieves has been to this point. A full season of Wil Nievers would be eight wins worse than average. EIGHT WINS! That means that as as good as Alex Rodriguez has been to this point, he still wouldn't neutralize how bad Wil Nieves would be as a full-time starter. A-Rod plus Nieves would end up as 26 runs below average. Pray for Jorge's continued health.
LD% and GB% are just some batted ball numbers. Line drives are the most likely type of balls to be hits, so the higher the LD%, the better the hitter typically. BABIP is the player's batting average on balls in play, calculated the same way as it is calculated for pitchers. Hitters do exhibit repeatable skill here to a certain extent, but an excessively high BABIP typically will correct itself at least partially.
So what do these numbers mean?
As I mentioned earlier, Alex Rodriguez has been the most valuable player in the league. He's already been as valuable offensively as he was all of last year, and there are still 77 games to go. An amazing season for an amazing player who is finally getting the respect he deserves by the mouth-breathing contingent of Yankee fandom.
Jorge Posada is also having his strongest season in years. He's never hit higher than .287 but is on pace to beat that. I am worried about his workload and his luck on balls in play catching up to him in the second half, but there are plenty of people underperforming who should pick up some of the slack.
Derek Jeter continues to shine offensively. Only Carlos Guillen has been more productive as a SS in the AL.
Posada and Jeter have a very high BABIP, although in Jeter's case his speed likely helps. Posada is a very probable candidate to fall off in the second half, at least a little.
Hideki Matsui's recent hot streak has pushed him from slightly above average to +8. Unless Jason Giambi comes back, Matsui is probably the second best power threat in the Yankee lineup, so they need him to continue his surge badly.
Jason Giambi was underperforming expectations, but despite the media's claims about him being out helping the Yankees be more flexible, if he can come back he makes the team better.
Andy Phillips is making the most of his second chance in pinstripes. Whether it's just the fact that he has 43 plate appearances, or if it's the result of adjustments he's made due to his struggles last year, he's filled what's been a giant hole of suck so far this year. I'm not willing to bet that it's going to last, we have a much larger sample size that shows he was overmatched in the bigs, but at the very least he's an upgrade on Miguel Cairo.
Chris Basak and Kevin Thompson haven't played much. Thompson seems like an ideal fourth OF, so if Melky becomes entrenched in center he may end up getting some more playing time going forward.
Robinson Cano's been a big disappointment offensively. Some falloff from .342 was certainly expected, but not this much of one. He's walking a touch more this season, but he's also striking out a lot more. Until he gets a better approach at the plate, expect him to be consistently inconsistent.
Josh Phelps is gone. He didn't get a fair chance to play regularly, so it's tough to know if he wasn't very good or if the erratic playing time hurt him.
Johnny Damon has stunk while batting leadoff, so he gets more chances to stink than anyone else on the team when he's in the lineup. It doesn't look like him going on the DL is a consideration at this point. If he can play some LF going forward he can rest Matsui and perhaps contribute defensively, but the contract he signed last season is starting to look like a disaster.
Melky's seasonal output has been disappointing, but he's been hitting well since May 1. Ignore the bleating that his early struggles were due to not getting regular playing time in April, he played in 21 of 24 games that month.
Miguel Cairo has been brutal offensively, which isn't a surprise. The problem is he's played far more than he should be, primarily at a position where his lack of offense is even more glaring. Add in the fact that his calling card of good defense no longer even seems to be a factor, and he's hurting the team on both sides of the ball. I personally like Miggy for some reason that I really can't understand, but the less he plays going forward the better. I don't know that Basak would be a better option than him as the backup infielder, but it may be worth considering.
Doug Mientkiewicz has hit like garbage. His supposedly great defense at first wasn't reflected in zone rating to this point, although ZR doesn't capture all the elements of first base defense . I wish him a healthy recovery from his multitude of injuries, but I'd prefer he doesn't get back before November. I'd really prefer to see Phillips get first base for the rest of the season just to see once and for all what he's got.
Bobby Abreu has been the biggest problem on the team relative to his expectations. Unless he hits going forward, the Yankees aren't going anywhere. Meanwhile, Gary Sheffield has been tearing it up in Detroit. Brian Cashman made the right move on paper, but it didn't play out on the field. Sheffield's +18 pBRaa, so he's been 24 runs better than Abreu offensively, but he's primarily DHing now.
Wil Nieves has pulled off the amazing feat of being the least valuable offensive player on the team despite only getting 53 plate appearances. He seems like a nice guy, but the sooner the Yankees can replace him with anyone they'll be better. In praise of Nieves, he's hitting much better with runners in scoring position at a lofty .214.
Overall as a team the Yankees are +38 pBRaa. Take out Alex Rodriguez, and they're just +5. Unless Cano, Abreu and Damon play better going forward, they're not going anywhere.
Wednesday, May 2, 2007
Yankee Defense by Zone Rating - through Games of May 1
Since it's been a while since I posted any charts or tables, here's a look at how the Yankees rate by zone rating (except for the catchers) so far this year. As I always suggest, anyone unfamiliar with Zone Rating should read this article.| Player | Pos | G | GS | INN | PM | Ch | ZR | Avg ZR | AvgPM | Diff | RS | RS/162 |
| Mientkiewicz, Doug | 1B | 23 | 16 | 151.0 | 19 | 24 | 0.792 | 0.835 | 20 | -1 | -1 | -8 |
| Phelps, Josh | 1B | 10 | 7 | 56.0 | 8 | 9 | 0.889 | 0.835 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Giambi, Jason | 1B | 1 | 1 | 7.0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.835 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| Cairo, Miguel | 1B | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.835 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cano, Robinson | 2B | 24 | 24 | 215.0 | 59 | 73 | 0.808 | 0.837 | 61 | -2 | -2 | -11 |
| Rodriguez, Alex | 3B | 24 | 24 | 213.0 | 40 | 51 | 0.784 | 0.763 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Cairo, Miguel | 3B | 1 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.763 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Damon, Johnny | CF | 19 | 16 | 140.0 | 41 | 46 | 0.891 | 0.883 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Cabrera, Melky | CF | 11 | 8 | 74.0 | 28 | 31 | 0.903 | 0.883 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Thompson, Kevin | CF | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.883 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cabrera, Melky | LF | 13 | 11 | 102.0 | 25 | 27 | 0.926 | 0.868 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 18 |
| Matsui, Hideki | LF | 11 | 11 | 92.0 | 17 | 21 | 0.810 | 0.868 | 18 | -1 | -1 | -16 |
| Cairo, Miguel | LF | 2 | 1 | 11.0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0.868 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| Thompson, Kevin | LF | 2 | 1 | 10.0 | 4 | 5 | 0.800 | 0.868 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -41 |
| Abreu, Bobby | RF | 24 | 24 | 214.0 | 55 | 66 | 0.833 | 0.856 | 57 | -2 | -1 | -9 |
| Thompson, Kevin | RF | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.856 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 174 |
| Jeter, Derek | SS | 22 | 22 | 195.0 | 70 | 91 | 0.769 | 0.831 | 76 | -6 | -4 | -31 |
| Cairo, Miguel | SS | 4 | 1 | 20.0 | 12 | 14 | 0.857 | 0.831 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Total | 194 | 167 | 1505 | 382 | 462 | 0.827 | 0.841 | 389 | -7 | -5 | -35 | |
| NAME | Pos | GP | GS | INN | A | E | PB | SB | CS | CS% | RS | RS/162 |
| Wil Nieves, NYY | C | 7 | 5 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 1 | 41 |
| Jorge Posada, NYY | C | 22 | 19 | 173 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 13% | -1 | -5 |
| Josh Phelps, NYY | C | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| G | Games | |
| GS | Games Started | |
| INN | Defensive Innings at Position | |
| A | Assists | |
| E | Errors | |
| Ch | Playable Chances | |
| PM | Plays Made | |
| ZR | Zone Rating (PM/Ch) | |
| Avg ZR | ZR by average defender at the same position and in the same league | |
| AvgPM | Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender | |
| Diff | Difference between PM and AvgPM | |
| RS | Runs Saved | |
| RS/162 | Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games | |
| PB | Passed Balls | |
| SB | Stolen Bases Allowed | |
| CS | Caught Stealing | |
| CS% | SB / (SB + CS) |
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
2007 Yankee Run Values - Through April 9
I figure it's a good time for a small sample-size look at how the Yankees have performed so far. Here's the position players on offense and defense. The last 3 columns are if you pro-rate over the rest of the season.| Player | BR | Def | Total | pBR | pDef | pTotal |
| A Rodriguez* | 6.7 | -0.3 | 6.3 | 180 | -9 | 171 |
| J Damon* | 2.5 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68 | 18 | 86 |
| B Abreu* | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 48 | 32 | 79 |
| J Posada* | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 43 | 4 | 48 |
| J Phelps* | -0.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | -4 | 18 | 15 |
| W Nieves* | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.4 | -12 | 0 | -12 |
| M Cairo* | -0.9 | 0.3 | -0.6 | -23 | 8 | -15 |
| J Giambi* | -0.8 | 0.0 | -0.8 | -23 | 0 | -23 |
| D Mientkiewicz* | -1.0 | -0.3 | -1.3 | -26 | -8 | -34 |
| H Matsui* | -0.4 | -0.9 | -1.4 | -11 | -26 | -37 |
| M Cabrera* | -3.0 | 1.4 | -1.7 | -82 | 37 | -45 |
| D Jeter* | 0.2 | -1.9 | -1.7 | 6 | -52 | -46 |
| R Cano* | -0.8 | -1.8 | -2.6 | -22 | -48 | -71 |
| Total | 5.2 | -1.0 | 4.3 | 142 | -26 | 115 |
Alex Rodriguez is on fire. Damon's not getting the hype, but he's doing really well too. The middle infield is sucking it up so far on both sides of the ball, but I don't expect that to continue for long. And what about the pitching?
| Player | RSAA | pRSAA |
| S Henn* | 2.2 | 59 |
| M Myers* | 1.9 | 51 |
| B Bruney* | 1.7 | 46 |
| K Farnsworth* | 1.4 | 38 |
| M Rivera* | 0.9 | 25 |
| L Vizcaino* | 0.6 | 15 |
| A Pettitte* | 0.3 | 9 |
| S Proctor* | -0.3 | -8 |
| C Pavano* | -0.7 | -18 |
| D Rasner* | -3.0 | -80 |
| M Mussina* | -4.1 | -111 |
| K Igawa* | -4.7 | -126 |
| Total | -3.7 | -100 |
| BR | Batting Runs above average (linear weights) |
| Def | Runs saved above average by Zone Rating |
| Total | BR + Def |
| RSAA | Runs saved above average (lgERA - ERA)/9 x IP |
The bullpen is carrying the pitching staff so far, which isn't exactly news to anyone who's been watching. They won't be able to keep up their performance, because if they're pitching as much as they have to this point they're going to get worn out, but you have to figure Moose will get better, and Igawa will either get better or be pitching in Scranton. Wang should return by the end of the month. As I mentioned at the top, small sample size clearly applies, but this should give you a rough idea of where the Yankees should get better. The fact that they've been scoring like they have with minimal to negative contribution from the bulk of their players is a very good sign. If they get their starting pitching to be serviceable, they'll be in pretty good shape.
Friday, February 9, 2007
Looking Ahead to 2007: The Backup Catcher Candidates
I’m having a rough week at work, which you may have noticed from my meager posting, but I wanted to at least get my 2007 player previews started. So, I figured I could squeeze in a quick look at the exciting trio of backup catchers the Yankees are bringing to spring training with an eye on the backup role to Jorge Posada. The three candidates whom it seems will be fighting out are Raul Chavez, Wil Nieves, and Todd Pratt.
Like last year, I’m going to run throught the various projection systems for each of these guys. In this case, we’ll be looking at their CHONE projections , their Marcel projections, their ZiPS projections, and their PECOTA projections.
First up, there’s Raul Chavez. Chavez will 34 in 2007, and brings a career line of .212/.253/.284 to the battle. How does he project in 2007? I’m sure it’s not very good, but we’ll take a look anyway.
Next up is Wil Nieves, the bounty for Bret Prinz a couple of years ago. Nieves isn’t particularly young at 29, and is pretty much a singles hitter with very little plate discipline.
Next up is non-roster invite Todd Pratt. At one time, Pratt was a really good backup catcher. He’s now 40. Would you believe he’s older than John Flaherty? 
I calculated the projected batting runs using linear weights compared to average, and position-adjusted for catchers. I removed PECOTA from the charts so I don’t get sued.
Remember Kelly Stinnett and how much he sucked? Raul Chavez is worse.
Based on projected playing time, Pratt’s about a half-win better than Nieves and a full win better than Chavez. Of course, this ignores defense. Here’s how their defense rates over the last five seasons.
Joe Torre is likely to take Pratt due to his experience. The numbers say it would end up being the smart move. Of course, Tessio thought he was making the smart move too.
Page 1 of 1 pages:








































