The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Tuesday, December 1, 2009

2009 Yankees Season in Review: Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the Defense

As requested, here’s a look at how Francisco Cervelli, Ramiro Pena and the overall team defense did compared to their projections.

After a 2008 season that saw him get to AA, Cervelli was still probably off the radar for 2009 despite a brief cameo at the end of 2008. However, injuries forced him into the picture, and he ended up getting 101 PAs. Here are his projections entering 2009, pro-rated to those 101 PAs.

francisco cervelli PA AB H 2B 3B HR SB CS BB SO AVG OBP SLG BR/650 wOBA -2 Std -1 Std +1 Std +2 Std %
2009 chone projection 101 92 20 4 1 1 1 0 8 25 .223 .296 .304 53 .268 .174 .221 .315 .362 95.3%
2009 marcel projection 101 90 25 5 1 3 2 1 9 18 .272 .337 .422 82 .321 .221 .271 .370 .420 114.2%
2009 pecota projection 101 90 21 5 0 1 1 0 8 24 .229 .300 .335 60 .277 .182 .229 .324 .372 98.5%
2009 tht projection 101 91 21 5 0 1 1 0 8 18 .236 .315 .321 59 .284 .188 .236 .332 .380 101.1%
2009 zips projection 101 90 21 4 0 1 1 1 7 18 .236 .317 .304 56 .281 .186 .234 .329 .377 100.2%
2009 cairo projection 101 91 22 5 0 1 0 0 7 21 .240 .314 .326 61 .284 .188 .236 .332 .380 101.2%
2009 average projection 101 90 22 5 0 1 1 0 8 21 .239 .313 .335 62 .286 .190 .238 .334 .382 101.8%
2009 actuals 101 94 28 4 0 1 0 3 2 11 .298 .309 .372 55 .281 .185 .233 .329 .376


Cervelli had shown pretty good plate discipline in the minors, but it deserted him in the majors. Despite that, he was able to come fairly close to his projected OBP because he hit six more singles. That also explains why he was able to exceed his SLG by a fair amount.

The .298 average is nice, but it was sort of empty, and it's doubtful he'll be able to replicate the same type of performance in 2010 if he has to rely on hitting .298 to do it. The good news is he should walk a little more and he's still going to be just 24, so he has room for growth in his offensive game. While it's probably unlikely he'll be more than a backup, he should be a decent one, especially if the good defense he showed in 2009 carries forward.

Sort of like Cervelli, Ramiro Pena hadn't gotten past AA prior to 2009, and he hadn't really impressed there either, slugging a monstrous .297 in 2008 for Trenton. Pena's calling card isn't his bat though, it's his glove. In a surprise, he made the Yankees on opening day as a backup IF, since Alex Rodriguez was out rehabbing his hip and the only other backup IF on the roster was Angel Berroa.

Because of Pena's unimpressive minor league resume, his projections were unimpressive.

ramiro pena PA AB H 2B 3B HR SB CS BB SO AVG OBP SLG BR/650 wOBA -2 Std -1 Std +1 Std +2 Std %
2009 chone projection 121 113 26 4 1 0 2 1 8 25 .233 .284 .297 48 .258 .173 .215 .300 .342 86.7%
2009 marcel projection 121 110 25 5 0 2 1 0 8 20 .224 .272 .320 50 .255 .170 .212 .297 .339 85.7%
2009 pecota projection 121 108 24 4 0 1 1 0 10 16 .223 .285 .286 47 .255 .171 .213 .297 .339 85.8%
2009 tht projection 121 113 25 4 1 1 1 1 7 22 .224 .276 .291 45 .252 .168 .210 .294 .336 84.8%
2009 zips projection 121 114 26 3 0 0 4 2 6 16 .224 .269 .263 39 .240 .158 .199 .282 .323 80.9%
2009 cairo projection 121 112 26 4 1 1 1 1 7 21 .232 .282 .290 46 .255 .171 .213 .297 .340 85.9%
2009 average projection 121 112 25 4 1 1 2 1 8 20 .227 .278 .291 46 .252 .168 .210 .295 .337 85.0%
2009 actuals 121 115 33 6 1 1 4 1 5 20 .287 .317 .383 71 .297 .208 .253 .342 .386


Like Cervelli, Pena hit more and walked less than expected. However, he did show a little more pop than projected, with two extra doubles. Obviously when we're dealing with sample sizes like this we shouldn't try to infer too much about what it means going forward, but Pena's final line in 2009 was better than replacement level, and would have made him about a win better than replacement level on offense if he had done it over 650 PAs.

So, how about the Yankee defense?

Since I started blogging in 2004, there's been one recurring theme with the Yankees. Their defense has generally been bad to awful. While you can hit and pitch well enough to overcome that, it can be frustrating to watch players not making plays other players can make.

When the Yankees let Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi go and replaced them with Mark Teixeira and Nick Swisher, that alone looked like a pretty decent defensive upgrade. Here's how the defense projected heading into 2009 compared to what they actually ended up doing.
Player Pos pZR pUZR pRAA zRSAA uRSAA aRSAA diff
Jorge Posada C -5 -10 -5
Jose Molina C 2 -2 -2 -2 -4
Francisco Cervelli C 0 0 0 2 2 2 2
Kevin Cash C 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1
Mark Teixeira 1B 5 2 3 8 -4 2 -1
Juan Miranda 1B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robinson Cano 2B 2 -2 0 -2 -5 -3 -4
Alex Rodriguez 3B -2 -1 -2 -6 -9 -7 -6
Cody Ransom 3B 0 0 0 -4 -4 -4 -4
Angel Berroa 3B 0 0 0 0 -3 -1 -1
Melky Cabrera CF 2 -2 0 0 -2 -1 -1
Brett Gardner CF 1 2 1 0 7 4 2
Johnny Damon LF -1 4 2 0 -9 -5 -6
Freddy Guzman LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Swisher RF 1 1 1 -4 -1 -3 -4
Eric Hinske RF 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Xavier Nady RF 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 0
Shelley Duncan RF 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0
Derek Jeter SS -5 -5 -5 -2 7 2 7
Ramiro Pena SS 0 0 0 -2 1 0 0
Total -2 -27 -25


pZR: Projected runs saved above average according to zone rating, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pUZR: Projected runs saved above average according to UZR, pro-rated to 2009 playing time.
pRAA: Average of pZR and pUZR
zRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to zone rating
uRSAA: Actual runs saved above average according to UZR
aRSAA: Average of zRSAA and uRSAA
diff: aRSAA - pRAA (negative means worse than projected)

The Yankee defense actually didn't play as well as projected, with the primary culprits being Johnny Damon, Alex Rodriguez and Jorge Posada. Cody Ransom and Angel Berroa's contributions also didn't really help. On the plus side, Derek Jeter was seven runs better than projected and Brett Gardner was two runs better.

Last year's team was about 40 runs below average, so at the very least they were better than that.

Interestingly, I completely forgot to do a season review for Mark Teixeira and Alex Rodriguez, so I'll post that next, then Mo's and then that should wrap up the backwards-looking stuff for now.
--Posted at 8:54 am by SG / 101 Comments | - (197)




Sunday, July 22, 2007

Breaking Down Jose Molina

Well, I'm back from my vacation, and I see that yup has a request for me, namely to see how Jose Molina compares to the typical backup catcher.

Molina is not a very good hitter, which I think we all know. The question is, will he a decent backup when you factor in offense and defense?

The average major league starting catcher this year (all players listed as catchers that lead their team in PA) is hitting .261/.319/.404. This translates to being about 9 runs below the average hitter over 650 plate appearances (using linear weights). So we already know that catcher is a weak offensive position.

Role G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB K BA OBP SLG OPS BR/650
Starters 2200 8508 7702 870 2013 411 23 215 1045 53 24 624 1274 .261 .319 .404 .723 -9
Backups 1281 3747 3370 338 792 160 8 64 373 7 12 271 716 .235 .294 .344 .638 -23


BR/650 - Batting runs using linear weights above average, pro-rated to 650 plate appearances.

It becomes even more apparent when you look at the backups how weak it is. The average backup catcher is hitting .235/.294/.344. Over 650 plate appearances that makes the average backup catcher 23 runs worse offensively than the average hitter.

So what can we expect from Flying Molina brother #2? He's having a bad year this season, hitting .224/.242/.288, which would be equivalent to -43 runs offensively over a full season. However, when you compare that to Wil Nieves, it looks a lot better, as Nieves's performance to this point would be -64 runs over 650 plate appearances.

We shouldn't just use this year's performance because of the small sample size. So I ran Molina through Dan Szymborski's handy-dandy ZiPS in-season projection tool, which revises a player's projection based on their YTD performance while still including their past performance.

Molina PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB K BA OBP SLG OPS BR/650
Projection 212 199 18 48 11 0 4 23 2 0 11 45 .241 .288 .357 .645 -22
Year-to-Date 128 125 9 28 8 0 0 10 2 1 3 30 .224 .242 .288 .530 -44
Rest-of-Year 88 83 7 20 5 0 1 8 1 0 4 19 .241 .284 .337 .621 -27
Total 216 208 16 48 13 0 1 18 3 1 7 49 .231 .259 .308 .567 -37
Nieves PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB K BA OBP SLG OPS BR/650
Projection 338 326 33 82 14 2 4 33 3 2 12 41 .252 .284 .344 .628 -28
Year-to-Date 66 61 6 10 4 0 0 8 0 0 2 9 .164 .190 .230 .420 -65
Rest-of-Year 102 99 10 24 5 1 1 11 1 1 3 13 .242 .272 .343 .615 -31
Total 165 160 16 34 9 1 1 19 1 1 5 22 .212 .241 .300 .541 -44


Doing this, Molina is projected to hit a lofty .241/.284/.337 over the remainder of the season. Doing the same with Nieves gives a line of .242/.272/343. As bad as Molina's line looks, that's just about what an average backup catcher would do. However, the upgrade over Nieves is minimal, around a run, but this assumes that Nieves can get closer to his projection over the remainder of the season, which is something I'd have my doubts about.

Of course, we have to remember defense as well. Molina's got a good rep as a defender, and prior to 2007 his defensive stats were pretty good. I only have his defense from 2002, but he didn't play much from 1999-2001 anyway.

Yr Name TM AGE G GS Inn PO A E DP PB SB CS CS% RS
2002 Jose Molina ANA 27 29 24 210.0 155 16 3 3 1 15 9 0.38 0
2003 Jose Molina ANA 28 53 39 332.0 221 17 1 0 3 18 7 0.28 0
2004 Jose Molina ANA 29 70 57 524.3 441 37 3 4 3 23 22 0.49 6
2005 Jose Molina ANA 30 65 53 480.3 409 40 3 6 3 19 20 0.51 6
2006 Jose Molina ANA 31 76 71 603.3 502 50 8 4 5 27 20 0.43 2
2007 Jose Molina ANA 32 40 37 323 283 17 4 2 2 18 7 0.28 -2


Molina's been a plus defender for most of his career. We don't have enough data to make a definitive assessment about Nieves, but this year he's been about a -2, and thrown out a lower percentage of base stealers than Molina (22.2%).

Basically, this looks like a minimal upgrade, but given the track records of the people involved, getting Molina gives the Yankees more certainty about what they can expect out of the backup catcher slot going forward. At the cost of Jeff Kennard, a 26 year old reliever still pitching in AA, it's probably worth it.

Nieves seems like a nice and popular guy in the clubhouse, so I feel a little for him, but like Joe Torre and Brian Cashman said on the post-game show yesterday, you have to do whatever you can to make the team better. I think this move does that, and I wish Nieves luck wherever he ends up.

--Posted at 9:37 am by SG / 7 Comments | - (679)




Wednesday, July 11, 2007

2007 Yankee Defense at the All Star Break

Wrapping up my All Star Break review of the Yankees so far, here's how their defense rates by zone rating. If you want to read a good explanation about zone rating, you should read this article by Chris Dial, but I am going to run through an example as well, to try and clarify exactly what the numbers that will follow mean.

I could pick on Derek Jeter, but I'm not going to go there. Instead I'm going to look at the brightest spot on the Yankee defense so far, Robinson Cano. We all know Cano's been a disappointment on offense, but let's look at his defense.

To help clarify the numbers I'm about to run through, here's the Stats Inc. Zone Rating grid, with the 2B area of responsiblity highlighted.



Any ball hit in that highlighted area that is converted into an out at least 50% of the time is considered a fieldable chance for a second baseman. This is based on observation by Stats Inc. scorers, but there are three people scoring these at every game and they score them independently to help cut down on subjectivity.

When a fielder has a ball hit into their zone of responsiblity, they are given a fieldable chance, which is the denominator in ZR. When they convert that into an out, it's considered a play made. When a fielder makes a play that is not his defined zone, it gets added to his chances and plays made so they get credit for it. The question is if they get enough credit for doing so, which is one limitation of zone rating. Another limitation is the zones of responsiblity are fixed, and do not account for positioning. This is a limitation when trying to assess a player's actual talent, but as far as their value in any given time, I don't think it's much of one. If a player is not put into position to make more plays than he is, that means they are not as valuable to their team as they should be, regardless of who is responsible for the positioning.

ZR is expressed as a three digit decimal from 0 to 1, and it's just plays made divided by fieldable chances. So if a player has 10 fieldable chances hit into his defined zone and converts 8 of them into outs, his ZR is .800. Plays are either made or not made in ZR. If a player makes an error, it's no worse than if their range never let them get to the ball in the first place.

So let's get back to Cano. Cano has played 84 games this season, and 747 defensive innings at second base. He has seen 274 fieldable chances, and has a ZR of .880. So we multiply his fieldable chances by .880 to get his plays made, which is 241.

The next thing we do is multiply the chances that Cano has had times the average ZR, to get an average plays made. This assumes that the types of chances a player faces over the course of a period are the same, and it's not necessarily true. Players could have stretches where they face easier chances or more difficult chances, which is why you will see players' defensive numbers fluctuate from season. Again, I consider this a limitation when trying to assess a player's ability, but not their value. This is the type of thing that should even out over time, which makes multi-year zone rating a decent gauge of a player's defensive talent.

In the American League, the average 2B has a ZR of .831. I separate the leagues because I've noticed systemic differences in the infields, and I assume it's at least partly due to pitchers "hitting." So, using the .831 avg ZR times Cano's 274 chances, we get an average plays made of 228. We subtract this from Cano's actual plays made to get a difference. 241 - 228 = 13, so Cano has converted 13 more plays into outs than average. This difference is then multiplied by the average run value of a play at that position, which was calculated by Dial and is based on the linear weights values of the single or XBH that the play would turn into if it is not made, as well as the marginal value of the out that was not recorded.

Here are the run values for the average plays at each position.

POS RV
1B: .798
2B: .754
3B: .800
CF: .842
LF: .831
RF: .843
SS: .753

For 2B, the average play is worth .754 runs, so we multiply that by Cano's +13 plays made and get a runs saved above average of 10. To calculate this over a full season, you just divide the runs saved by the innings played and multiply by 1440 innings.

Credit for this methodology goes to Chris Dial and his article Dr. StrangeGlove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Zone Rating and to Chone Smith and his article Tweaking Zone Rating. Without them breaking zone rating down this clearly for me I never would have been able to understand it.

The same basic idea is used for figuring out all players except pitchers and catchers, and here are the numbers for the Yanks.

Player TM LG Pos G GS INN PO A E DP Ch PM ZR Avg ZR AvgPM Diff RS RS/162
Cano, Robinson NYY AL 2B 84 84 747 178 271 6 78 274 241 .880 .831 228 13 10 19
Rodriguez, Alex NYY AL 3B 83 83 724 63 149 5 15 207 168 .812 .762 158 10 8 16
Cabrera, Melky NYY AL CF 59 48 445 154 5 1 1 166 152 .916 .889 148 4 4 12
Cabrera, Melky NYY AL LF 18 16 142 34 2 0 0 34 31 .912 .872 30 1 1 11
Cairo, Miguel NYY AL 3B 7 3 35 1 9 1 2 10 9 .900 .762 8 1 1 45
Cairo, Miguel NYY AL SS 8 2 36.2 3 15 0 1 18 16 .889 .824 15 1 1 35
Thompson, Kevin NYY AL RF 4 2 18 6 0 0 0 5 5 1.000 .859 4 1 1 48
Cabrera, Melky NYY AL RF 4 3 26 3 0 0 0 3 3 1.000 .859 3 0 0 20
Giambi, Jason NYY AL 1B 2 2 14 11 1 0 3 2 2 1.000 .842 2 0 0 26
Basak, Chris NYY AL 3B 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1.000 .762 1 0 0 91
Posada, Jorge NYY AL 1B 1 1 6 6 0 0 1 0 0 .000 .842 0 0 0 0
Damon, Johnny NYY AL 1B 3 0 4.1 4 0 1 1 0 0 .000 .842 0 0 0 0
Nieves, Wil NYY AL 1B 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .842 0 0 0 0
Phillips, Andy NYY AL 3B 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .762 0 0 0 0
Thompson, Kevin NYY AL CF 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .889 0 0 0 0
Basak, Chris NYY AL SS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .824 0 0 0 0
Thompson, Kevin NYY AL LF 4 1 13.2 5 0 0 0 6 5 .833 .872 5 0 0 -21
Phillips, Andy NYY AL 1B 13 10 90.1 85 4 0 12 16 13 .813 .842 13 0 0 -6
Cairo, Miguel NYY AL 2B 2 2 17 5 6 0 0 8 6 .750 .831 7 -1 0 -41
Cairo, Miguel NYY AL LF 3 1 13 2 0 0 0 3 2 .667 .872 3 -1 -1 -57
Phelps, Josh NYY AL 1B 29 20 162.2 167 9 3 16 27 22 .815 .842 23 -1 -1 -5
Abreu, Bobby NYY AL RF 84 81 720 156 2 4 0 183 156 .852 .859 157 -1 -1 -2
Damon, Johnny NYY AL LF 1 1 9 1 0 0 0 3 1 .333 .872 3 -2 -1 -215
Damon, Johnny NYY AL CF 41 38 318 106 1 0 0 119 104 .874 .889 106 -2 -1 -7
Mientkiewicz, Doug NYY AL 1B 48 36 330.1 353 14 2 46 59 47 .797 .842 50 -3 -2 -9
Cairo, Miguel NYY AL 1B 21 17 155.1 161 9 4 16 42 32 .762 .842 35 -3 -3 -25
Matsui, Hideki NYY AL LF 68 67 586.1 131 4 2 0 152 127 .836 .872 132 -5 -5 -11
Jeter, Derek NYY AL SS 84 83 726.1 128 246 13 69 295 227 .769 .824 243 -16 -12 -24
Total 678 601 5345.2 1765 748 42 261 1633 1370 .839 .840 1371 -1 -1 -2


Legend
INN - Innings
PO - Putouts
A - Assists
E - Errors
DP - Double plays
Ch - Fieldable chances
PM - Plays made
ZR - Zone Rating
AvgZR - Average ZR
AvgPM - Average PM
Diff - PM minus AvgPM
RS - Runs saved
RS/162 - Runs saved pro-rated to 162 games

So yeah, Cano's been great. Also great, Alex Rodriguez, who has rebounded from two sub-par years at third after a solid 2004 defensively. Melky's flashing a plus glove in LF and CF and this doesn't even include his arm.

The rest of the numbers seem to match my observations pretty well, although I'd have pegged Abreu to be a little worse and Matsui to be a bit better. This is part of the reason I've grown fond of zone rating. It's freely available, it's easy to convert to runs, and for the most part the players I think are good and bad defenders show up as such in ZR.

These numbers are not meant to be an absolute assessment of either a players' defensive ability or value. First of all, we're dealing with a small sample size. The difference between Jeter being average or horrible is about one play a week. Second of all, as I've listed above, there are limitations in zone rating which need to be acknowledged and understood. Over at Bronx Banter the other day there was a heated discussion about defensive metrics and their pros and cons. The way I described it to someone over there is this. Let's say you have a group of hitters, and the only thing you know about him is their batting averages. Would you prefer to use your visual observations of the players' abilities and whether they have good at bats, or would you rather use batting average to determine their skill at least partially, even acknowledging that batting average has limitations? That's kind of where I think defensive metrics should fall into place.

For catchers, I use a combination of passed balls and stolen base percentage. It's not a great method because pitchers deserve some of the blame for stolen bases, but again, if we think of it in terms of value instead of ability it's better than nothing.

NAME GP GS INN TC PO A E DP FPCT PB SB CS CS% CERA RS RS/150
Jorge Posada, NYY 77 68 621 427 394 30 3 2 .993 3 61 19 0.24 4.42 -3 -7
Wil Nieves, NYY 21 18 142 105 99 5 1 1 .990 0 17 5 0.23 4.12 -1 -5
Josh Phelps, NYY 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Posada's defense has typically been average or slightly below, but he was great last year. He's back below average this year, but he's hitting more than well enough to compensate. Wil Nieves has a wonderful smile, which is apparently all he needs to have to be the Yankees' backup catcher.

With the pitching, offense and defense all assessed it's time to see where everyone on the Yankees ranks in terms of overall value, so here you go.

Last BR DR PR TR
Rodriguez 33 8 42
Wang 18 18
Posada 19 -3 16
Bruney 8 8
Cano -2 10 8
Myers 7 7
Clemens 6 6
Matsui 8 -5 4
Rivera 3 3
Villone 3 3
Jeter 15 -12 2
Pettitte 2 2
Hughes 2 2
Britton 2 2
Giambi 1 0 2
Proctor 1 1
Cabrera -5 5 1
Mussina 0 0
Ramirez 0 0
Phillips 0 0 0
Basak 0 0 0
Rasner -1 -1
Thompson -1 0 -1
Pavano -1 -1
Henn -1 -1
Farnsworth -1 -1
Bean -2 -2
Wright -3 -3
Vizcaino -3 -3
Desalvo -3 -3
Phelps -3 -1 -4
Clippard -4 -4
Karstens -5 -5
Damon -4 -3 -6
Cairo -5 -2 -7
Abreu -6 -1 -7
Nieves -7 -1 -8
Mientkiewicz -6 -2 -8
Igawa -13 -13
Total 38 -6 15 47


BR = Batting runs
DR = Defensive runs
PR = Pitching runs
TR = Total runs

I'd take Bruney and Myers's high ranking with a big grain of salt. It may be better to use a linear weights type formula for relievers' value to the team since ERA or RA can hide their performances with inherited runners.

I was surprised to see that Cano's defense makes him such a plus contributor, but I guess that's the case at least by this methodology. If you want to get angry, you can figure out how much the "contributions" of Abreu, Mientkiewicz and Igawa have cost the team this year.
--Posted at 4:27 am by SG / 30 Comments | - (1222)




Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Yankee Offense at the All Star Break

I'm going to use the All Star Break to explain a little bit about the way I rank players' offensive values. As most regular readers know, I'm a big fan of linear weights.

The concept for linear weights was introducted by Pete Palmer in his ground-breaking book, The Hidden Game of Baseball. In a nutshell, linear weights assigns a marginal value to just about every event that can happen on the baseball field, both good and bad. You can incorporate batting, baserunning, defense, etc., to really look at the overall contribution that a player is providing to his team.

Instead of getting too heavy into the mechanism of LWTS, I'd just point anyone that is interested in the guts behind it to this link. Today I'm just going to focus on the offensive portion of the Yankees' linear weights.

The formula I use was refined by Tango Tiger and uses the following weights:

Batting Runs(BR) = (.47 x H) + (.38 x 2B) + (.55 x 3B) + (.93 x HR) + (.33 x (BB + HBP)) + .22 x SB + (-.38 x CS) + (-.1 x (AB - H))

The one change I make is I add GDP into the outs factor (AB - H). You could also add reaching on errors although I tend to ignore that out of simplicity.

Anyway, unless a player is really bad, they will have a positive value for BR, because any positive contribution creates some kind of run value. The only Yankee with a negative BR is Wil Nieves, and he's only at -1.

Once you have a players BR, you can do a couple of things. The first thing is to compare them to the average batter, regardless of position. This is useful for just figuring out the net value of a player, and for when you want to look at moving players around the different positions, as well as for direct comparisons.

The other thing that you can do, is position-adjust the players. As should be fairly obvious to most baseball fans, the average shortstop does not hit as well as the average first baseman (unless it's the Yankees), so offense from the shortstop position is harder to find, and therefore more valuable. So what I do is calculate the BR at every defensive position. I then divide BR by plate appearances, and I subtract the average BR/PA from a player's BR/PA, and then multiply by the number of plate appearances that the player has had. This tells you how much better a player has been compared to an average player over the same playing time.

Let's run through an example with Derek Jeter. Jeter's raw BR this season so far is 60. Divided by his plate appearances, he creates .152 BR/PA. The average AL SS has created 596 BR this eason, over 5194 PA, a BR/PA of .115. So Jeter's position-adjusted batting runs above average would be (.152-.115) x his PA, which comes out to about 15 runs above the average AL SS this year. That makes him the third most valuable offensive Yankee this season, behind Alex Rodriguez (the most valuable offensive player in the league regardless of position by linear weights), and Jorge Posada.

So, here are the Yankees' offensive players sorted by most valuable in position-adjusted batting runs.

Last pBRaa G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K BA OBP SLG
Rodriguez 33 85 380 319 79 101 21 0 30 86 47 71 .317 .413 .665
Posada 19 82 331 291 46 95 25 0 9 48 34 61 .327 .399 .505
Jeter 15 85 395 348 57 117 23 3 5 44 35 47 .336 .408 .463
Matsui 8 73 316 274 46 75 19 0 11 53 36 38 .274 .358 .464
Giambi 1 45 179 149 19 39 5 0 7 23 25 35 .262 .380 .436
Phillips 0 15 43 38 6 12 3 0 1 5 3 6 .316 .381 .474
Basak 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000
Thompson -1 11 17 15 1 3 2 0 0 2 2 7 .200 .294 .333
Cano -2 85 350 328 40 90 24 4 6 40 15 52 .274 .314 .427
Phelps -3 36 88 80 8 21 2 0 2 12 6 19 .263 .330 .363
Damon -4 76 313 273 44 67 10 1 5 27 38 42 .245 .339 .344
Cabrera -5 76 299 265 31 73 9 4 4 31 22 33 .276 .331 .385
Cairo -5 44 111 99 9 26 6 0 0 10 6 16 .263 .308 .323
Mientkiewicz -6 50 141 124 17 28 7 0 4 16 10 16 .226 .292 .379
Abreu -6 85 375 322 59 85 16 2 5 41 44 65 .264 .352 .373
Nieves -7 22 53 50 2 6 0 0 0 4 2 5 .120 .154 .120


pBRaa = position-adjusted batting runs above average

Some more numbers that you may or may not find interesting:

Last HBP GDP SB CS P/PA BA/BIP LD% GB% HR/F BA/RISP BR BRaa pBR/150
Rodriguez 9 8 9 2 3.8 .333 18.2% 41.5% 29.4% .303 81 33 57
Posada 3 14 1 0 3.8 .395 22.7% 42.1% 11.0% .274 55 14 37
Jeter 8 11 7 7 3.6 .380 20.8% 55.7% 7.1% .427 60 10 24
Matsui 2 5 2 1 4.1 .290 15.8% 48.3% 12.8% .268 45 6 17
Giambi 4 1 1 0 4.4 .302 19.1% 28.7% 11.7% .318 26 3 5
Phillips 1 2 0 0 3.7 .355 21.9% 43.8% 9.1% .500 6 1 5
Basak 0 0 0 0 3 .000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0 0 -147
Thompson 0 0 0 0 4.2 .375 25.0% 12.5% 0.0% .500 2 -1 -26
Cano 5 6 2 4 3.3 .313 15.2% 53.3% 6.9% .214 41 -3 -4
Phelps 2 5 0 0 3.9 .322 21.3% 36.1% 7.7% .280 9 -2 -24
Damon 1 0 15 0 4.4 .276 17.3% 51.9% 7.0% .238 36 -3 -8
Cabrera 2 7 6 1 3.7 .308 19.7% 55.7% 7.1% .234 33 -4 -10
Cairo 1 2 7 1 3.7 .317 13.6% 42.0% 0.0% .303 11 -3 -29
Mientkiewicz 2 3 0 0 3.7 .233 23.9% 36.7% 9.3% .200 14 -4 -28
Abreu 3 10 12 4 4.2 .325 21.5% 45.4% 5.8% .239 45 -2 -11
Nieves 0 3 0 0 3.4 .133 13.3% 53.3% 0.0% .214 -1 -8 -83


BR is the raw batting run total as I mentioned before, BRaa is batting runs above the average player without any position-adjustments, and pBR/150 is position-adjusted batting runs per 150 games. That really hammers home how bad Wil Nieves has been to this point. A full season of Wil Nievers would be eight wins worse than average. EIGHT WINS! That means that as as good as Alex Rodriguez has been to this point, he still wouldn't neutralize how bad Wil Nieves would be as a full-time starter. A-Rod plus Nieves would end up as 26 runs below average. Pray for Jorge's continued health.

LD% and GB% are just some batted ball numbers. Line drives are the most likely type of balls to be hits, so the higher the LD%, the better the hitter typically. BABIP is the player's batting average on balls in play, calculated the same way as it is calculated for pitchers. Hitters do exhibit repeatable skill here to a certain extent, but an excessively high BABIP typically will correct itself at least partially.

So what do these numbers mean?

As I mentioned earlier, Alex Rodriguez has been the most valuable player in the league. He's already been as valuable offensively as he was all of last year, and there are still 77 games to go. An amazing season for an amazing player who is finally getting the respect he deserves by the mouth-breathing contingent of Yankee fandom.

Jorge Posada is also having his strongest season in years. He's never hit higher than .287 but is on pace to beat that. I am worried about his workload and his luck on balls in play catching up to him in the second half, but there are plenty of people underperforming who should pick up some of the slack.

Derek Jeter continues to shine offensively. Only Carlos Guillen has been more productive as a SS in the AL.

Posada and Jeter have a very high BABIP, although in Jeter's case his speed likely helps. Posada is a very probable candidate to fall off in the second half, at least a little.

Hideki Matsui's recent hot streak has pushed him from slightly above average to +8. Unless Jason Giambi comes back, Matsui is probably the second best power threat in the Yankee lineup, so they need him to continue his surge badly.

Jason Giambi was underperforming expectations, but despite the media's claims about him being out helping the Yankees be more flexible, if he can come back he makes the team better.

Andy Phillips is making the most of his second chance in pinstripes. Whether it's just the fact that he has 43 plate appearances, or if it's the result of adjustments he's made due to his struggles last year, he's filled what's been a giant hole of suck so far this year. I'm not willing to bet that it's going to last, we have a much larger sample size that shows he was overmatched in the bigs, but at the very least he's an upgrade on Miguel Cairo.

Chris Basak and Kevin Thompson haven't played much. Thompson seems like an ideal fourth OF, so if Melky becomes entrenched in center he may end up getting some more playing time going forward.

Robinson Cano's been a big disappointment offensively. Some falloff from .342 was certainly expected, but not this much of one. He's walking a touch more this season, but he's also striking out a lot more. Until he gets a better approach at the plate, expect him to be consistently inconsistent.

Josh Phelps is gone. He didn't get a fair chance to play regularly, so it's tough to know if he wasn't very good or if the erratic playing time hurt him.

Johnny Damon has stunk while batting leadoff, so he gets more chances to stink than anyone else on the team when he's in the lineup. It doesn't look like him going on the DL is a consideration at this point. If he can play some LF going forward he can rest Matsui and perhaps contribute defensively, but the contract he signed last season is starting to look like a disaster.

Melky's seasonal output has been disappointing, but he's been hitting well since May 1. Ignore the bleating that his early struggles were due to not getting regular playing time in April, he played in 21 of 24 games that month.

Miguel Cairo has been brutal offensively, which isn't a surprise. The problem is he's played far more than he should be, primarily at a position where his lack of offense is even more glaring. Add in the fact that his calling card of good defense no longer even seems to be a factor, and he's hurting the team on both sides of the ball. I personally like Miggy for some reason that I really can't understand, but the less he plays going forward the better. I don't know that Basak would be a better option than him as the backup infielder, but it may be worth considering.

Doug Mientkiewicz has hit like garbage. His supposedly great defense at first wasn't reflected in zone rating to this point, although ZR doesn't capture all the elements of first base defense . I wish him a healthy recovery from his multitude of injuries, but I'd prefer he doesn't get back before November. I'd really prefer to see Phillips get first base for the rest of the season just to see once and for all what he's got.

Bobby Abreu has been the biggest problem on the team relative to his expectations. Unless he hits going forward, the Yankees aren't going anywhere. Meanwhile, Gary Sheffield has been tearing it up in Detroit. Brian Cashman made the right move on paper, but it didn't play out on the field. Sheffield's +18 pBRaa, so he's been 24 runs better than Abreu offensively, but he's primarily DHing now.

Wil Nieves has pulled off the amazing feat of being the least valuable offensive player on the team despite only getting 53 plate appearances. He seems like a nice guy, but the sooner the Yankees can replace him with anyone they'll be better. In praise of Nieves, he's hitting much better with runners in scoring position at a lofty .214.

Overall as a team the Yankees are +38 pBRaa. Take out Alex Rodriguez, and they're just +5. Unless Cano, Abreu and Damon play better going forward, they're not going anywhere.

--Posted at 5:35 am by SG / 49 Comments | - (1126)




Wednesday, May 2, 2007

Yankee Defense by Zone Rating - through Games of May 1

Since it's been a while since I posted any charts or tables, here's a look at how the Yankees rate by zone rating (except for the catchers) so far this year. As I always suggest, anyone unfamiliar with Zone Rating should read this article.

Player Pos G GS INN PM Ch ZR Avg ZR AvgPM Diff RS RS/162
Mientkiewicz, Doug 1B 23 16 151.0 19 24 0.792 0.835 20 -1 -1 -8
Phelps, Josh 1B 10 7 56.0 8 9 0.889 0.835 8 0 0 10
Giambi, Jason 1B 1 1 7.0 1 1 1.000 0.835 1 0 0 27
Cairo, Miguel 1B 1 0 1.0 0 0 0.000 0.835 0 0 0 0
Cano, Robinson 2B 24 24 215.0 59 73 0.808 0.837 61 -2 -2 -11
Rodriguez, Alex 3B 24 24 213.0 40 51 0.784 0.763 39 1 1 6
Cairo, Miguel 3B 1 0 2.0 0 0 0.000 0.763 0 0 0 0
Damon, Johnny CF 19 16 140.0 41 46 0.891 0.883 41 0 0 3
Cabrera, Melky CF 11 8 74.0 28 31 0.903 0.883 27 1 1 10
Thompson, Kevin CF 1 0 1.0 0 0 0.000 0.883 0 0 0 0
Cabrera, Melky LF 13 11 102.0 25 27 0.926 0.868 23 2 1 18
Matsui, Hideki LF 11 11 92.0 17 21 0.810 0.868 18 -1 -1 -16
Cairo, Miguel LF 2 1 11.0 2 2 1.000 0.868 2 0 0 29
Thompson, Kevin LF 2 1 10.0 4 5 0.800 0.868 4 0 0 -41
Abreu, Bobby RF 24 24 214.0 55 66 0.833 0.856 57 -2 -1 -9
Thompson, Kevin RF 1 0 1.0 1 1 1.000 0.856 1 0 0 174
Jeter, Derek SS 22 22 195.0 70 91 0.769 0.831 76 -6 -4 -31
Cairo, Miguel SS 4 1 20.0 12 14 0.857 0.831 12 0 0 20
Total 194 167 1505 382 462 0.827 0.841 389 -7 -5 -35
NAME Pos GP GS INN A E PB SB CS CS% RS RS/162
Wil Nieves, NYY C 7 5 41 3 0 0 3 3 50% 1 41
Jorge Posada, NYY C 22 19 173 9 1 1 20 3 13% -1 -5
Josh Phelps, NYY C 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0


G Games
GS Games Started
INN Defensive Innings at Position
A Assists
E Errors
Ch Playable Chances
PM Plays Made
ZR Zone Rating (PM/Ch)
Avg ZR ZR by average defender at the same position and in the same league
AvgPM Estimated Plays Made over the same # of chances by an average defender
Diff Difference between PM and AvgPM
RS Runs Saved
RS/162 Runs Saved pro-rated to 162 games
PB Passed Balls
SB Stolen Bases Allowed
CS Caught Stealing
CS% SB / (SB + CS)
As a team, they're on pace to end up about 35 runs below average. Sadly, that seeems about right. As you can see, some of the #s are a little off due to the small sample sizes. What really jumps out at me is how well Melky rates defensively so far this season, after not looking so good last year by zone rating. It also seems that so far, Alex Rodriguez's defense has been better than it was in either 2005 or 2006. Hopefully that continues.
--Posted at 10:24 pm by SG / 5 Comments | No Trackbacks - (498)




Tuesday, April 10, 2007

2007 Yankee Run Values - Through April 9

I figure it's a good time for a small sample-size look at how the Yankees have performed so far. Here's the position players on offense and defense. The last 3 columns are if you pro-rate over the rest of the season.
Player BR Def Total pBR pDef pTotal
A Rodriguez* 6.7 -0.3 6.3 180 -9 171
J Damon* 2.5 0.7 3.2 68 18 86
B Abreu* 1.8 1.2 2.9 48 32 79
J Posada* 1.6 0.2 1.8 43 4 48
J Phelps* -0.1 0.7 0.5 -4 18 15
W Nieves* -0.4 0.0 -0.4 -12 0 -12
M Cairo* -0.9 0.3 -0.6 -23 8 -15
J Giambi* -0.8 0.0 -0.8 -23 0 -23
D Mientkiewicz* -1.0 -0.3 -1.3 -26 -8 -34
H Matsui* -0.4 -0.9 -1.4 -11 -26 -37
M Cabrera* -3.0 1.4 -1.7 -82 37 -45
D Jeter* 0.2 -1.9 -1.7 6 -52 -46
R Cano* -0.8 -1.8 -2.6 -22 -48 -71
Total 5.2 -1.0 4.3 142 -26 115


Alex Rodriguez is on fire. Damon's not getting the hype, but he's doing really well too. The middle infield is sucking it up so far on both sides of the ball, but I don't expect that to continue for long. And what about the pitching?

Player RSAA pRSAA
S Henn* 2.2 59
M Myers* 1.9 51
B Bruney* 1.7 46
K Farnsworth* 1.4 38
M Rivera* 0.9 25
L Vizcaino* 0.6 15
A Pettitte* 0.3 9
S Proctor* -0.3 -8
C Pavano* -0.7 -18
D Rasner* -3.0 -80
M Mussina* -4.1 -111
K Igawa* -4.7 -126
Total -3.7 -100


BR Batting Runs above average (linear weights)
Def Runs saved above average by Zone Rating
Total BR + Def
RSAA Runs saved above average (lgERA - ERA)/9 x IP

The bullpen is carrying the pitching staff so far, which isn't exactly news to anyone who's been watching. They won't be able to keep up their performance, because if they're pitching as much as they have to this point they're going to get worn out, but you have to figure Moose will get better, and Igawa will either get better or be pitching in Scranton. Wang should return by the end of the month. As I mentioned at the top, small sample size clearly applies, but this should give you a rough idea of where the Yankees should get better. The fact that they've been scoring like they have with minimal to negative contribution from the bulk of their players is a very good sign. If they get their starting pitching to be serviceable, they'll be in pretty good shape.
--Posted at 7:58 am by SG / 13 Comments | No Trackbacks - (683)




Friday, February 9, 2007

Looking Ahead to 2007: The Backup Catcher Candidates

I’m having a rough week at work, which you may have noticed from my meager posting, but I wanted to at least get my 2007 player previews started.  So, I figured I could squeeze in a quick look at the exciting trio of backup catchers the Yankees are bringing to spring training with an eye on the backup role to Jorge Posada.  The three candidates whom it seems will be fighting out are Raul Chavez, Wil Nieves, and Todd Pratt.
Like last year, I’m going to run throught the various projection systems for each of these guys.  In this case, we’ll be looking at their CHONE projections , their Marcel projections, their ZiPS projections, and their PECOTA projections

First up, there’s Raul Chavez.  Chavez will 34 in 2007, and brings a career line of .212/.253/.284 to the battle.  How does he project in 2007?  I’m sure it’s not very good, but we’ll take a look anyway.

Next up is Wil Nieves, the bounty for Bret Prinz a couple of years ago.  Nieves isn’t particularly young at 29, and is pretty much a singles hitter with very little plate discipline. 

Next up is non-roster invite Todd Pratt.  At one time, Pratt was a really good backup catcher.  He’s now 40.  Would you believe he’s older than John Flaherty? 



I calculated the projected batting runs using linear weights compared to average, and position-adjusted for catchers.  I removed PECOTA from the charts so I don’t get sued.

Remember Kelly Stinnett and how much he sucked?  Raul Chavez is worse.

Based on projected playing time, Pratt’s about a half-win better than Nieves and a full win better than Chavez.  Of course, this ignores defense.  Here’s how their defense rates over the last five seasons.



Joe Torre is likely to take Pratt due to his experience.  The numbers say it would end up being the smart move.  Of course, Tessio thought he was making the smart move too.


--Posted at 9:30 am by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (179)



Page 1 of 1 pages: