The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 








RSS 2.0 Atom

*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



Player

Current Projected

Look what people have to say about Larry Mahnken's commentary!

"Larry, can you be any more of a Yankee apologist?.... Just look past your Yankee myopia and try some objectivity."
- Bernal Diaz

"Mr. Mahnken is enlightened."
- cordially, as always,
rm

"Wow, Larry. You've produced 25% of the comments on this thread and said nothing meaningful. That's impressive, even for you."
- Anonymous

"After reading all your postings and daily weblog...I believe you have truly become the Phil Pepe of this generation. Now this is not necessarily a good thing."
- Repoz

"you blog sucks, it reeds as it was written by the queer son of mike lupica and roids clemens. i could write a better column by letting a monkey fuk a typewriter. i dont need no 181 million dollar team to write a blog fukkk the spankeees"
- yan

"i think his followers have a different sexual preference than most men"
- bob

"Boring and predictable."
- No Guru No Method

"Are you the biggest idiot ever?"
- Randal

"I'm not qualified to write for online media, let alone mainstream media."
- Larry Mahnken



This site is best viewed with a monitor.

Disclaimer: If you think this is the official website of the New York Yankees, you're an idiot. Go away.


Monday, August 7, 2006

A different way of looking at it

SG’s last post ran the rest of August projections using log5 to predict that the Yankees would go 12-12 over the next 24 games and go into September 2 games behind the Red Sox.  I’ve got some issues with his conclusions.
First of all, there his projection of the Yankees/Sox 5-game set.  He made a mistake somewhere, because Boston is projected to go 3-2 that series, not 4-1.  They’re not going to win 80% of their games against the Yankees at Fenway.  That changes things to the Yankees and Sox being tied for first on 9/1, with the Yankees percentage points ahead.

The second is his HFA adjustment of .042.  That’s from Diamond-Mind’s 2002 sim on postseason records, and they used the 2002 HFA of .542 to adjust the advantage that season.  Well, it’s not 2002, and HFA this season is only .535, and .540 historically.  That makes a marginal difference.

The third is that he’s simply projecting the outcome of each series by rounding the numbers.  If the Yankees have a .499 expected winning percentage against the White Sox in US Cellular Field, then he projects they’ll go 1-2, which is a .333 winning percentage, when they’d be only slightly less likely to go 2-1.  (They actually should win .478 of the time there).  If you don’t round the numbers the Yankees should have a .556 winning percentage over the next 24 games rather than a .542.  No, they won’t be winning and losing partial games, but they’re also not going to be missing every single break.  Well, probably not.

This is more of an issue for the Red Sox, as they have a real expected winning percentage of .565 but a rounded winning percentage of .625.  Sure, if they get the breaks they could do even better than that.  But then, they also should have gone 5-2 this last week rather than 3-4.

Then, of course, there is using straight winning percentage for the projection.  Not a huge issue, but there’s also Pythagorean Record and BPro’s W3% to try.

Using Pythagorean Record, and using a .535 HFA, and not rounding off the wins and losses until after you add them all up, the Standings on September 1st would look like:



TeamWLPct.GB
Yankees7953.598-
Red Sox7856.5822

If we used BPro’s W3% instead of Pythagorean record (W3% factors in the strength of schedule), the standings would be:


TeamWLPct.GB
Yankees8052.606-
Red Sox7856.5823

And if we go with just plain old W-L record for or projections, but adjust the HFA to .535 and don’t round until afterwards, the standings would be:


TeamWLPct.GB
Yankees7953.598-
Red Sox7955.5901

A lot of things can go wrong between now and September 1st, though.  A lot of things can go right, too.  This is a very tough stretch the Yankees are starting tomorrow, but the Red Sox are hardly going through an easy stretch themselves.


--Posted at 9:38 am by Larry Mahnken / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (124)



Page 1 of 1 pages: