Tuesday, May 5, 2009
2009 AL Team Positional Splits Sorted By WAR through May 5
WAR stands for wins above replacement. Read the legend after the first chart for more detail. The splits below are totals for games played at position. So these include the backups at every position, but don't combine time from other positions. So, for example, Jorge Posada's DH splits are not part of the C splits, but they are in the DH splits. These don't include catcher defense since I don't have that spreadsheet handy, but include zone rating defense for all other non-DH positions. While UZR is probably better than ZR, it's not updated daily so I'm not using it for this particular exercise.Splits are from Baseball Reference, zone rating from CNNSI.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | CLE | C | 113 | .326/.416/.537 | 16 | 7.5 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.8 |
| 2 | OAK | C | 96 | .326/.365/.472 | 13 | 6.2 | 0 | 6.2 | 0.6 |
| 3 | NYY | C | 105 | .308/.394/.538 | 13 | 5.3 | 0 | 5.3 | 0.5 |
| 4 | MIN | C | 94 | .337/.394/.442 | 13 | 5.3 | 0 | 5.3 | 0.5 |
| 5 | TOR | C | 118 | .303/.330/.468 | 13 | 3.9 | 0 | 3.9 | 0.4 |
| 6 | LAA | C | 95 | .286/.409/.494 | 11 | 3.5 | 0 | 3.5 | 0.3 |
| 7 | KCR | C | 98 | .264/.306/.538 | 10 | 2.1 | 0 | 2.1 | 0.2 |
| 8 | BOS | C | 103 | .216/.320/.432 | 9 | 1.1 | 0 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 9 | CHW | C | 94 | .261/.309/.398 | 8 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 10 | DET | C | 95 | .220/.305/.317 | 7 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 11 | TEX | C | 96 | .244/.292/.356 | 7 | -0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | 0.0 |
| 12 | BAL | C | 100 | .170/.270/.307 | 6 | -1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | -0.1 |
| 13 | SEA | C | 97 | .220/.242/.308 | 5 | -2.9 | 0 | -2.9 | -0.3 |
| 14 | TBR | C | 104 | .204/.220/.337 | 4 | -4.1 | 0 | -4.1 | -0.4 |
PA: Plate appearances
AVG/OBP/SLG: Batting average/on-base percentage/slugging percentage
BR: Batting runs using linear weights
BRAR: BR above replacement level (position and playing time adjusted)
Def: Runs saved above average for everyone who's played the position using zone rating
RAR: Runs above replacement(BRAR + Def)
WAR: Wins above replacement (RAR divided by 10)
Until I add defense in here for catchers, this is incomplete. So far, at least offensively, the Yankee catchers have been solid.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | BOS | 1B | 111 | .404/.523/.764 | 23 | 12.5 | 0 | 12.8 | 1.3 |
| 2 | TOR | 1B | 119 | .290/.395/.510 | 16 | 5.3 | 2 | 7.1 | 0.7 |
| 3 | DET | 1B | 101 | .389/.455/.578 | 15 | 5.6 | 0 | 5.8 | 0.6 |
| 4 | CLE | 1B | 109 | .319/.404/.447 | 14 | 4.2 | 0 | 4.6 | 0.5 |
| 5 | MIN | 1B | 110 | .323/.382/.566 | 15 | 4.9 | -1 | 4.3 | 0.4 |
| 6 | CHW | 1B | 95 | .294/.358/.459 | 11 | 2.4 | 1 | 2.9 | 0.3 |
| 7 | SEA | 1B | 104 | .304/.375/.609 | 13 | 3.4 | -1 | 2.9 | 0.3 |
| 8 | NYY | 1B | 115 | .200/.365/.422 | 11 | 0.8 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| 9 | BAL | 1B | 112 | .284/.339/.441 | 11 | 1.0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 10 | TBR | 1B | 114 | .270/.360/.660 | 11 | 0.8 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 11 | LAA | 1B | 96 | .267/.313/.500 | 9 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 12 | KCR | 1B | 102 | .258/.353/.461 | 11 | 1.3 | -1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| 13 | TEX | 1B | 99 | .182/.253/.375 | 4 | -5.5 | 1 | -4.0 | -0.4 |
| 14 | OAK | 1B | 99 | .205/.306/.277 | 7 | -2.6 | -3 | -5.8 | -0.6 |
Apparently the going rate for middling 1B production is $22M per season. I kid. Sort of.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | KCR | 2B | 102 | .378/.441/.567 | 18 | 9.1 | 0 | 9.3 | 0.9 |
| 2 | BOS | 2B | 118 | .307/.398/.416 | 15 | 4.5 | 2 | 6.9 | 0.7 |
| 3 | NYY | 2B | 109 | .363/.394/.569 | 15 | 5.3 | 1 | 6.8 | 0.7 |
| 4 | TEX | 2B | 113 | .337/.389/.703 | 17 | 6.6 | 0 | 6.6 | 0.7 |
| 5 | BAL | 2B | 120 | .314/.400/.448 | 15 | 4.5 | 1 | 5.7 | 0.6 |
| 6 | DET | 2B | 110 | .265/.303/.382 | 11 | 1.0 | 4 | 5.4 | 0.5 |
| 7 | TOR | 2B | 130 | .358/.400/.558 | 18 | 5.7 | -3 | 3.1 | 0.3 |
| 8 | LAA | 2B | 102 | .271/.300/.438 | 10 | 0.2 | 2 | 2.4 | 0.2 |
| 9 | CLE | 2B | 103 | .284/.382/.375 | 12 | 2.9 | -3 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 10 | TBR | 2B | 105 | .274/.343/.379 | 13 | 3.5 | -3 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 11 | OAK | 2B | 95 | .241/.287/.276 | 6 | -2.4 | 2 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| 12 | CHW | 2B | 108 | .269/.346/.355 | 12 | 2.5 | -4 | -1.6 | -0.2 |
| 13 | SEA | 2B | 106 | .263/.314/.358 | 8 | -2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | -0.2 |
| 14 | MIN | 2B | 111 | .168/.227/.238 | 4 | -6.3 | -2 | -7.9 | -0.8 |
Looks like even with his hot offensive start, Cano is still about equal with Pedoria once defense is factored in.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | TBR | 3B | 116 | .343/.397/.657 | 18 | 8.9 | 4 | 12.6 | 1.3 |
| 2 | DET | 3B | 97 | .316/.443/.671 | 13 | 5.3 | 3 | 8.5 | 0.8 |
| 3 | TOR | 3B | 121 | .308/.392/.433 | 14 | 5.0 | 3 | 7.7 | 0.8 |
| 4 | MIN | 3B | 102 | .237/.304/.398 | 8 | 0.2 | 7 | 7.2 | 0.7 |
| 5 | KCR | 3B | 106 | .264/.368/.473 | 12 | 4.1 | 3 | 7.1 | 0.7 |
| 6 | LAA | 3B | 106 | .247/.368/.303 | 12 | 3.6 | 1 | 4.5 | 0.5 |
| 7 | BOS | 3B | 106 | .284/.311/.529 | 11 | 3.2 | -1 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| 8 | TEX | 3B | 110 | .314/.364/.578 | 14 | 5.8 | -5 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 9 | CLE | 3B | 116 | .226/.284/.415 | 8 | -1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | -0.1 |
| 10 | CHW | 3B | 103 | .283/.359/.402 | 11 | 3.3 | -6 | -2.5 | -0.2 |
| 11 | OAK | 3B | 96 | .163/.250/.302 | 5 | -2.9 | 0 | -2.5 | -0.3 |
| 12 | SEA | 3B | 108 | .202/.222/.269 | 5 | -2.9 | 0 | -2.6 | -0.3 |
| 13 | NYY | 3B | 92 | .212/.256/.306 | 7 | -0.6 | -5 | -5.4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | BAL | 3B | 106 | .238/.274/.307 | 5 | -3.0 | -5 | -7.9 | -0.8 |
Ramiro Pena's unexpected performance is the only reason the Yankee 3B conglomerate is not in last place. The Yankees may be getting a reinforcement here as soon as Friday, although Serena Roberts will do everything in her power to stop that apparently.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | TOR | SS | 135 | .262/.396/.458 | 15 | 5.5 | 8 | 13.6 | 1.4 |
| 2 | TBR | SS | 104 | .378/.413/.561 | 16 | 8.5 | 4 | 12.5 | 1.3 |
| 3 | TEX | SS | 90 | .313/.353/.438 | 11 | 4.0 | 0 | 3.7 | 0.4 |
| 4 | NYY | SS | 119 | .280/.353/.439 | 13 | 4.3 | -1 | 3.5 | 0.3 |
| 5 | MIN | SS | 94 | .278/.370/.291 | 9 | 2.2 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.2 |
| 6 | CHW | SS | 95 | .221/.274/.291 | 6 | -0.8 | 3 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| 7 | BAL | SS | 93 | .264/.304/.333 | 8 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.2 |
| 8 | DET | SS | 94 | .268/.318/.402 | 8 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 9 | LAA | SS | 93 | .282/.308/.341 | 8 | 1.5 | -2 | -0.5 | 0.0 |
| 10 | OAK | SS | 107 | .237/.298/.269 | 7 | -1.3 | 0 | -0.9 | -0.1 |
| 11 | BOS | SS | 99 | .236/.313/.337 | 8 | 0.4 | -2 | -1.8 | -0.2 |
| 12 | CLE | SS | 110 | .224/.303/.316 | 9 | 0.5 | -3 | -2.6 | -0.3 |
| 13 | KCR | SS | 99 | .202/.224/.309 | 5 | -2.5 | -1 | -3.8 | -0.4 |
| 14 | SEA | SS | 96 | .287/.284/.383 | 9 | 1.4 | -6 | -4.3 | -0.4 |
Remember when I told you to enjoy it while it lasted? I hope you listened, because it's apparently over. Since April 11, Derek Jeter's zone rating has gone from .923 to .771. He's gone from a full season pace of +61 to -9. He's still hitting well though.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | TBR | LF | 119 | .311/.378/.377 | 18 | 8.0 | 2 | 10.5 | 1.0 |
| 2 | LAA | LF | 99 | .322/.384/.400 | 13 | 4.6 | 2 | 6.9 | 0.7 |
| 3 | BOS | LF | 108 | .300/.472/.575 | 17 | 8.0 | -3 | 5.1 | 0.5 |
| 4 | DET | LF | 95 | .259/.326/.365 | 11 | 3.1 | 1 | 4.0 | 0.4 |
| 5 | SEA | LF | 109 | .309/.385/.394 | 12 | 3.2 | 1 | 3.9 | 0.4 |
| 6 | TOR | LF | 111 | .250/.333/.406 | 10 | 0.9 | 1 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| 7 | TEX | LF | 103 | .236/.330/.449 | 9 | 0.6 | 1 | 1.7 | 0.2 |
| 8 | CLE | LF | 103 | .236/.333/.404 | 10 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| 9 | OAK | LF | 104 | .227/.279/.351 | 7 | -2.1 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| 10 | KCR | LF | 111 | .260/.330/.396 | 10 | 0.7 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| 11 | MIN | LF | 106 | .283/.362/.435 | 12 | 2.7 | -2 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 12 | CHW | LF | 105 | .233/.362/.523 | 9 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 13 | NYY | LF | 115 | .267/.348/.495 | 12 | 1.9 | -2 | -0.3 | 0.0 |
| 14 | BAL | LF | 97 | .207/.320/.293 | 7 | -1.4 | -7 | -8.1 | -0.8 |
Damon's hitting pretty well I thought, but Yankee LF has been pretty unproductive in context of AL LF. When I saw Tampa Bay LF so high despite a .377 SLG, I figured there was something wrong with my spreadsheets, but nope. TSCC has stolen 18 bases without being caught, which is worth somewhere around four runs. Go TSCC. Defense looks like it's partially to blame here, with all three Yankees who've seen LF time having a below average zone rating so far.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | KCR | CF | 117 | .247/.357/.464 | 14 | 4.5 | 4 | 8.1 | 0.8 |
| 2 | MIN | CF | 105 | .271/.324/.365 | 11 | 3.0 | 5 | 7.7 | 0.8 |
| 3 | DET | CF | 113 | .270/.333/.530 | 10 | 1.0 | 4 | 4.9 | 0.5 |
| 4 | BAL | CF | 116 | .324/.391/.569 | 17 | 7.4 | -5 | 2.7 | 0.3 |
| 5 | OAK | CF | 100 | .227/.310/.295 | 7 | -0.9 | 4 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| 6 | TOR | CF | 125 | .286/.352/.473 | 15 | 4.7 | -3 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| 7 | NYY | CF | 104 | .275/.343/.374 | 10 | 1.9 | 0 | 2.1 | 0.2 |
| 8 | SEA | CF | 101 | .262/.347/.369 | 8 | -0.1 | 2 | 1.5 | 0.2 |
| 9 | TEX | CF | 107 | .267/.299/.386 | 10 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 10 | CLE | CF | 121 | .250/.347/.481 | 12 | 2.0 | -1 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 11 | LAA | CF | 102 | .292/.363/.539 | 12 | 4.1 | -4 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 12 | TBR | CF | 121 | .188/.314/.307 | 10 | 0.5 | -1 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| 13 | BOS | CF | 118 | .279/.314/.333 | 11 | 2.0 | -2 | -0.2 | 0.0 |
| 14 | CHW | CF | 89 | .263/.330/.288 | 6 | -0.9 | -2 | -3.2 | -0.3 |
The first place Royals are getting yeoman's work out of CF. And some pitcher named Greinke. While we've not enjoyed the Brett Gardner experience, Fluky Cabrera has pushed Yankee CF performance overall into the middle of the pack. Will it last? My head says nope, but Austin Jackson may fix that given the way he's playing in AAA to this point.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | BAL | RF | 116 | .361/.448/.546 | 19 | 8.7 | -1 | 7.2 | 0.7 |
| 2 | TEX | RF | 103 | .290/.350/.527 | 11 | 2.3 | 5 | 7.2 | 0.7 |
| 3 | NYY | RF | 108 | .319/.407/.574 | 16 | 6.5 | 0 | 6.4 | 0.6 |
| 4 | OAK | RF | 103 | .311/.398/.422 | 12 | 3.0 | 3 | 5.8 | 0.6 |
| 5 | SEA | RF | 115 | .308/.351/.411 | 11 | 1.4 | 2 | 3.8 | 0.4 |
| 6 | TBR | RF | 100 | .226/.350/.345 | 10 | 1.2 | 2 | 3.2 | 0.3 |
| 7 | CHW | RF | 101 | .287/.327/.468 | 8 | -0.4 | 2 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| 8 | MIN | RF | 106 | .280/.358/.419 | 12 | 3.4 | -2 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| 9 | TOR | RF | 125 | .263/.312/.404 | 12 | 1.9 | -1 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| 10 | LAA | RF | 100 | .278/.320/.344 | 11 | 2.1 | -1 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 11 | CLE | RF | 109 | .236/.352/.393 | 11 | 1.4 | -1 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 12 | BOS | RF | 109 | .280/.376/.516 | 13 | 4.1 | -6 | -1.8 | -0.2 |
| 13 | DET | RF | 103 | .216/.324/.284 | 6 | -2.8 | 0 | -2.3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | KCR | RF | 98 | .233/.320/.337 | 7 | -0.9 | -2 | -2.9 | -0.3 |
Nick Markakis is ridiculously good, isn't he? Nick Swisher looks to be as well, at least so far.
| Rk | TM | Pos | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | BR | BRAR | Def | RAR | WAR |
| 1 | TOR | DH | 122 | .302/.388/.528 | 17 | 7.0 | 0 | 7.0 | 0.7 |
| 2 | TEX | DH | 106 | .305/.377/.695 | 14 | 6.1 | 0 | 6.1 | 0.6 |
| 3 | CLE | DH | 115 | .276/.383/.520 | 14 | 5.4 | 0 | 5.4 | 0.5 |
| 4 | LAA | DH | 101 | .319/.380/.484 | 12 | 4.1 | 0 | 4.1 | 0.4 |
| 5 | NYY | DH | 110 | .253/.364/.407 | 12 | 3.9 | 0 | 3.9 | 0.4 |
| 6 | TBR | DH | 112 | .237/.348/.333 | 11 | 2.6 | 0 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| 7 | CHW | DH | 104 | .253/.346/.505 | 10 | 2.0 | 0 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| 8 | SEA | DH | 110 | .253/.355/.358 | 11 | 1.9 | 0 | 1.9 | 0.2 |
| 9 | OAK | DH | 102 | .214/.353/.333 | 9 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 10 | BAL | DH | 106 | .247/.340/.430 | 9 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 11 | BOS | DH | 114 | .208/.298/.302 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 12 | MIN | DH | 109 | .238/.266/.410 | 8 | -0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | -0.1 |
| 13 | KCR | DH | 105 | .191/.276/.351 | 7 | -1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | -0.1 |
| 14 | DET | DH | 101 | .226/.267/.290 | 5 | -2.4 | 0 | -2.4 | -0.2 |
Admit it, you thought Hideki Matsui was washed up. So did I. Yankee DH numbers are supressed by pre-knee drain Matsui, who hit .148/.303/.296 through his first nine games. He's hit .362/.436/ .553 since then. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't do that well all year, but I think .280/.350/.460 is reasonable (if his average drops .080 points and his IsoD and IsoP stay the same, his .362/.436/.553 becomes .282/.356/.473). That's pretty solid out of DH.
As I shouldn't have to tell you, there are sample size issues here with everything, which should be apparent given the small spread between best and worst. This should be combined with the information we had entering the season, it should not displace it.
I am going back on vacation until the Yankees win again, so I should be back in about five weeks.
Page 1 of 1 pages:








































