Sunday, August 26, 2007
Should We Be Worried about Phil Hughes?
Consider the following list of pitchers:Jeremy Bonderman
Roger Clemens
Jon Garland
Tom Glavine
Roy Halladay
Al Leiter
Greg Maddux
Jake Peavy
Brad Penny
Jose Rijo
C.C. Sabathia
Johan Santana
John Smiley
John Smoltz
Jeff Suppan
Javier Vazquez
Obviously the first thing that comes to mind is that they've all been decent to great pitchers in MLB, varying from league average inning-eaters to future Hall of Famers and everything in between. The other thing that this group of pitchers has in common is that they all debuted in the majors by the age of 22.
Here's how this group of pitchers did collectively prior to turning 23.
| Age | W | L | RA | ERA | G | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | HR+ | BB+ | K+ |
| <23 | 194 | 225 | 5.14 | 4.68 | 759 | 3556.1 | 3620 | 2031 | 1850 | 398 | 1532 | 2596 | 90 | 105 | 93 | 106 |
ERA+, HR+, BB+, and K+ are how the pitchers' ERA, HR rate, BB rate, and K rate compared to league average. 100 is exactly average, less than 100 is worse than average, greater than 100 is better than average.
Here's how that same group of pitchers has done since turning 23 through the end of 2006.
| Age | W | L | RA | ERA | G | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | HR+ | BB+ | K+ |
| 23+ | 2090 | 1379 | 3.79 | 3.45 | 4974 | 30660.2 | 28383 | 12921 | 11758 | 2677 | 9104 | 23953 | 131 | 140 | 136 | 116 |
The point is, some pretty good pitchers have struggled in the majors before making the adjustments necessary to cope with big league batters. In other words, Phil Hughes wouldn't be the first pitcher to have a rough time when he first got to the majors and then improve.
That aside, I will admit that I was hoping to see better fastball velocity from Hughes, but given the injuries and missed time this season I'm willing to be patient. I'm also concerned that he doesn't seem to be the ground ball machine that he was in the minors to this point, although I have no idea how GB% translates from the majors to the minors. Hughes gave up six HRs in 275 minor league innings, and gave up 3 HRs in just six innings today, although Granderson's shouldn't really be considered a HR.
Hughes has a respectable FIP and xFIP of 4.18 and 4.28 respectively. He has struck out 22.5% of the hitters he has faced in the majors, compared to the AL starter average of 16.8%. One problem he's had is a higher than average walk rate, walking 9.4% of the batters he's faced compared to the AL average starter's 8.4%. His HR rate is also a touch above average thanks to today's game, at 3.1% compared to 2.6%. This matches up pretty nicely with the two tables above, which show that this selected group of pitchers all improved their HR rate and BB rate over time.
All in all, Hughes's peripherals indicate that he's not necessarily pitched as badly as you'd think if you looked at just his ERA of 5.35. That's probably at least partially a function of the big innings that Hughes has fallen victim to so far, which I think are innings where he's had to adjust to what wasn't working and part of the learning process.
Hughes is certainly not a sure thing, no pitching prospect is, but if he turns out to be a disappointment then every single scout that raved about him and every single stat he put up in the minors will have turned out to be wrong. I guess this is all a really long way of answering the question in the title. No, we should not be worried about Phil Hughes.
As for the rest of the team, I'm not particularly worried either. This has been a rough road trip, but I didn't expect it to be a good one. I'll just hope against hope that Mike Mussina can pitch serviceably well and the Yankees can steal tomorrow's game and head home for Boston on an up note.
Comments
Al Leiter, who has obviously forgotten more about pitching than I will ever know, made a comment during the YES broadcast that confused me. He said that Hughes is a two pitch pitcher right now. But in the minors, he threw a two seamer, a four seamer, a curve, and had a developing change.
As SG pointed out, we aren’t seeing the GB rate in the majors to this point. Is it because he doesn’t have a feel for the two seamer yet?
I agree that Hughes’s velocity is likely being affected by the residual effects of two serious leg injuries.
There is also the issue of whether or not the mechanical change (the higher arm slot) that Hughes has undergone from 2006 to 2007 has been beneficial.
Worried about his career on the basis of a couple of rough starts? Of course not. Worried about his ability to help the team make the payoffs this year? Absolutely.
Also, I thought I’d read that he was closer to the 2006 arm slot since coming back from the DL.
You’ve kind of answered your own question. The problem is that people want him to be something more than a 21-year-old, because his potential is so high and it’d be nice if he would realize all of it, right now. That’s not how it works, and in fact 21 is so young that he might NEVER make it. I expect he will, since he’s proven himself right up to the majors and has shown his ability here and there. In all likelihood it’s just a matter of getting his makeup together. But that last part almost never happens at his age.
One thing I like about what my Sox are doing is they’re sending/holding Lester and Buchholz down, even after they’ve pitched well. Buchholz was one and done; Lester is in the rotation but had his spot skipped and got shipped out to Pawtucket this weekend to stay on turn. The message this sends to them is, we’re not depending on you right now. The Yankees need to keep Hughes in the show, since he has nothing to prove anywhere else, but do it in a way that lets him breathe. That’s a conundrum when you have one month to make up ground on the playoffs though.
It was a mediocre start, but he didn’t get a lot of help from the rest of the team. Tommorrow, if we can get to the bullpen before the 6th, I say we win. Detroit has been playing with fire the entire series, and I think they’ll get burned at some point. I also imagine Moose having an amazing “save-my-job” start. Hey, I can dream, can’t I?
Don’t worry about Phil…he’ll be fine. What I’m worried about is Seattle and how they continue to get the job done.
Pete Abe:
Then I turn on the television to hear Joe Morgan talk for two minutes about what a great job “Sean” Hillenbrand did on some play for the Dodgers against the Mets. Um, that’s Shea Hillenbrand, Joe. He’s been in the majors for a while.
How does ESPN get so many good people for college hoops, college football, the NFL and other sports and use guys like Morgan, Steve Phillips and John Kruk for baseball? Or Jeff Brantley for that matter?
I don’t know what Harold Reynolds was up to. But he’s Vin Scully compared to that crew.
OK, enough ranting.
I now see why sports writers don’t jab at each other. Abraham is right, but he’s also now opened himself up to criticism for the stupid shit he says, which is plentiful, though not as plentiful as Phillips, Morgan or Kruk.
I just can’t believe how many of these guys are clueless ... you would think, somewhere someone would be good at their job, right?
Oh, and I’m not worried about Hughes. It’d be great if he was pitching better, but he’s our best option at this point and the part that I particularly like is seeing him have a good inning (2nd) after a rough one (1st) or a strike out after giving up a homerun - he’s mature and doesn’t get riled up and abandon his game plan just because things aren’t going well.
From EJ Fagan of MVN: It’s pretty clear now: Philip Hughes is messed up. He is clearly not the player right now that was placed on the top of prospect lists and looked ready to take the major leagues by storm. At the end of 2006, Hughes was comfortably pumping 95 mph fastballs on the corners to Eastern League Batters. Today, Hughes was erratically controlling a fastball that barely topped 91 mph and quite often fell into the high 80s. He was eratically controlling what used to be one of the minor’s best curveballs, and barely was able to throw the changeup.
Michael Kay asked the question to Al Leiter during the broadcast today, “Do you see greatness in Phil Hughes” and Leiter did everything he could to avoid saying “No”. Leiter, as honest as a broadcaster can be in today’s world, pointed out what he saw: a kid with plus-plus makeup, plus control, a good curveball, a good body, good mechanics and an average four-seam fastball. In other words, he saw Phil Hughes in 2004. He didn’t see the finely-honed product that the Yankees brought through their system.
What happened? The short answer is ‘a lot of things’. Hughes lefty the Yankees for almost three months with a hamstring after no-hitting the Texas Rangers through 8 innings. When I reported on that game, I counted the velocity on his fastballs. Hughes was pitching at 92 or 93 mph. That’s not the 95 mph that he was hitting before (Hughes had 3 pitches at 94 mph, but none higher), but it’s respectable. Clearly, something was different from the year before, but he still had a plus fastball. Today’s Phil Hughes had an average or worse 4-seam fastball.
What happened? Where did Phil Hughes go? Well, there are a couple of theories.
1. Arm strength and Injuries. After not throwing in the offseason, it was going to take Phil some time to work back up to his maximum velocity. He was at 92-93 in May, and if everything went right, would be back at 95 by the time the summer rolled around. Unfortunately, the hamstring injury and subsequent ankle injury brought him a step back in arm strength. At present, the injuries are also impeding him mentally; preventing him from using his legs as well.
2. Mechanics. Last May, before Phil’s injury, Carlos Gomez wrote a very informative piece on Hughes’ mechanics, and followed it up with two more. In sum, Gomez writes that mechanically, the Hughes of 2006 and the Hughes of 2007 are different pitchers. The 2007 Hughes is throwing from a higher arm slot with a more controlled, less athletic stance, causing reduced velocity and movement on his fastball, but better break on his curveball.
There really isn’t much doubt in my mind that #2 is the real answer. Someone, somehow decided to mess with Hughes’ mechanics, and he’s suffering now for it. The 92-93 mph Phil is probably what we can expect to get back when he’s healthy. A line at the end of Carlos Gomez’s article in May almost perfectly echoes what Al Leiter said this evening:
And yet, even with his four-seam fastball, and such an over the top delivery, how did he get a reputation for being a groundball pitcher? Is it mostly his curveball that causes all those ground outs? His fastball in ‘07 is more conducive with flyouts/strikeouts… I can see the ground balls with his ‘06 mechanics, and I’m willing to bet that he’s been getting more fly balls after the arm slot change.
I don’t like Phil’s transformation. Why it was made is unknown to me - and it could very well have to do with a perfectly reasonable concern like the long term health of his shoulder. However, Phil does become a worse pitcher with the changes. I wrote many times before the seasons started that Hughes was “The perfect pitcher, bringing a power fastball, great curveball, phenomenal control, and the superb ability to keep the ball on the ground. Phil Hughes is without weakness.”
Guess what? That’s no longer the case. Phil’s “new” mechanics do not allow him to keep the ball on the ground (he seems to have completely abandoned his 2-seamer), and have taken away his ability to blow hitters away when his control fails. He’ll give up more home runs (his greatest strength in the minors was preventing home runs) than he would with his natural mechanics.
Are the two injuries playing a factor right now? I think that’s pretty evident. He’s not getting the controlled bite on his curveball that we saw in May, and the velocity is way down. He’ll return to form, and even now could become a very good major league pitcher, but we’re not looking at the minor’s best pitcher. We’re looking at a potential Javy Vazquez or John Lackey if everything goes right, instead of say, Curt Schilling or Mark Prior
Am I being alarmist? Maybe. It’s possible. Phil could always undo the damage done to him, or he could still be in the process of adjusting to his new mechanics. I hope that I’m wrong.
this scares me
8 - very interesting stuff, but I think that’s way more than fair use. A snippet and a link would be more standard practice.
sorry
my bad
i’ll try not to do that again
Carlos wrote that when Hughes first came up earlier this season. In his most recent analysis of Phil’s mechanics (post-DL), he says his arm slot is lower:
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/mechanics/discussion/tht_chamberlain_or_hughes_who_has_the_better_mechanics/
You’ll also note in that article that the higher arm-slot helps with is curve-ball. It is entirely possible that the Yankees want Hughes to work with the higher arm-slot to give him more options, and that there was never a plan to COMPLETELY change his delivery. A lot of pitchers through from different arm slots, and often through the same pitches from different arm slots to get different effects, and keep the hitters off balance. Moose and Pedro are two current pitchers who do it, and Cone was famous for it.
I’m not going to get too worried about anything with Hughes right now, except maybe if Steinbrenner gets anxious and fires Cashman and trades Hughes for Soriano or something. Other than that I expect 2009 to be Hughes breakout year where he nails down the top pitching spot - or #2 if Chamberlain nails down the top spot, but then I think it will be a 1 and 1A case - for years to come.
And I think Seattle is starting to fold, and when the Yankees play them the Yanks will sweep and not look back.
Moose and Pedro are two current pitchers who do it, and Cone was famous for it.
That El Duque fellow has been known to change his delivery from one pitch to the next. And us old farts remember this guy named Tiant—five different pitches from three different arm angles for a total of fifteen pitches. Well, that’s what they used to say, anyway.
My theory is that its all about the legs. From watching him it seems like he isnt driving as hard with the legs as he did earlier this year/last year. This could be two things. Either the injury meant he didnt build up his leg strength as much as he should have, or he is concerned about re-injuring the leg and thus isnt going after it as hard. Both of these are fixable. Hughes will never throw 98 but I fully expect him back to 93-95 next year.
Remember last year Hughes was better in the second half, this year he didnt have the first half to help him build up.
i’m not worried about Phil. i expect the yankees to work on his mechanics over the winter. right now, he is just here to get more experience and hold down the #5 spot.
if everyone on the internet is talking about the difference in his mechanics, surely the yankees are aware of it. he’s going to have to throw some innings this winter to make up for the 3 months he lost this year, and hopefully things will start to click for him.
the yankees need to tread water for another week, and then they can hopefully make their move in the WC race.
as bad as this weekend was, Seattle kept it from being disastrous.
I’m hoping this turns out like the Rosalita lyric: “Some day we’ll look back and this will all seem funny.”
oh your papa says he knows that i don’t have any money.
I listened to the game on the radio and the Tigers announcers said Hughes was throwing slightly harder the last three innings. I also noticed more troubling was him falling behind early in the count on almost every hitter it seemed. Strangely though, he managed to rally to retire most everyone on a long fly or K. The more disappointing part was the Yanks offense once again not being able to close a one run game. To some degree at some point the manager’s decisions play into these close games. Allowing lefty on lefty situations (waiting to make substitutions) and counting on rallies in the last two innnings, not trying to steal a base, etc. It looked to me that Leyland knew exactly what needed to be done and made all the right moves at the right times. I didn’t stay up on Friday night once the Yanks had come back and tied at 6. For some reason I was confident that the Tigers would win that one and sure enough that’s exactly what happened. Crazy though, umpires starting a game at past 10 Eastern.
“Tommorrow, if we can get to the bullpen before the 6th, I say we win.”
I haven’t seen much evidence in this series myself to feel comfortable with the Yanks doing damage to this team’s pen. Jeter must be seriously injured or just getting old. He hasn’t hit a fastball to the warning track in months it seems. He poked an opposite field homer Aug 1 in NY, but is late on every fastball, normally missing completely or fouling back. He better step up his game for the team to have any chance at the card. I’m not nearly as confident as some of you at least at this point.
i also don’t understand why giambi hasn’t been playing consistently.
everytime he plays he hits a HR. then he sits for 2 days. it’s just bizarre.
everytime he plays he hits a HR. then he sits for 2 days. it’s just bizarre.
Did you hear? Home runs don’t win games, small ball does. Torre keeps giving Giambi a chance to prove he knows how to win, but Giambi keeps going and hitting those homers. Torre is going to keep the tough-love up until Giambi figures it out and starts bunting with runners on.
I really need to know why there seems to be a large number of Red Sox fans here in Rochester! Every time we play the Pawsox, there seems to be more people cheering for them then for our home team (Red Wings). There’s just something wrong with that.
Lar—what’ll you give me to not tell Trisha all the cute “when Larry was a kid” stories? *evil laugh*
Where’s the dancing banana?
How come this blog never reaches 1000 comments?
Here’s my position on Hughes’ start against the Tigers:
He lost because he made a rookie mistake in the first. With a man on first and two outs, you don’t give Carlos Guillen anything good to hit. The guys after him in the lineup range from terrible to not major league ready. See if Guillen will chase something 3-1 and, if not, be happy with the walk and go after Rodriguez who looks to be 70-80% cooked.
isn’t that posada’s job?
same thing with calling that 1st pitch curveball to Jeff Mathis.
Ultimately, I expect the pitcher to throw the right pitches. And it’s possible that Posada wanted a pitch off the plate, but Hughes didn’t get it there. Hughes is learning and that kind of mistake will come less frequently as time goes on. If there’s one thing his track record indicates, it’s that Hughes adapts well.
I am worried about Hughes not just because of the results, my concern is his velocity on his FB that is 5 mph slower than one year ago and that he is not mixing his pitches, he throws 95% of the time 4 seamers and curveballs. He is not throwing his 2 seamer to get groundballs and he throws a changeup once every 3 innings. I like the way he pitches, his confidence on the mound but his stuff is not what I expected.
How come this blog never reaches 1000 comments?
Most readers don’t comment, and it’s quality over quantity thing I think. I’d rather read 30-50 somewhat interesting comments than 500+ of garbage, and I think most of the readers here feel the same way.
isn’t that posada’s job?
It was Molina yesterday, not Posado.
I like the way he pitches, his confidence on the mound but his stuff is not what I expected.
I agree, I expected better physical stuff, but I wouldn’t be surprised if with the leg issues he had earlier that never comes back this season. Since he didn’t have an arm injury I’d expect an offseason of rehab to help him get back to that.
Ok, first of all, dakranker, Hughes never sat at 95. For some reason, that has spread all over the place. Hughes has always sat around 93, going anywhere from 90-95. Yesterday he was in that range, and as mentioned above, he was around 93 for the last three innings. Hughes tends to slow down and speed up his FB depending on location and batter—he has also said he CAN throw harder, but chooses control instead.
Secondly, the post written by EJ from MVN IS alarmist, and actually gets some things wrong. Hughes has said himself he changed the arm angle before going to Trenton, so it doesn’t account for any dramatic difference between GB #s.
If you look at the differences between Hughes in the two starts before injury and the starts since you see a pitcher who has been sapped of strength from an injury to the place where he generates it from and a lack of innings (remember he didn’t throw in the offseason either). Plus, as mentioned above, despite Hughes having a 4 seamer, 2 seamers, curve, slider and change as all plus pitches, the game plan has been 90% 2 seamers and 10% curves. period. The 2 seemer is a much slower pitch than the 4 seamer but moves downward a bit more.
I don’t know why this has been the pitch selection, it might be to work on Hughes regaining his strength without cranking out the slider before he is 100% trustworthy of his legs. I don’t know why no changeup really though.
Finally, Hughes is 21. he is 6 years away from his prime and has yet to log close to 200 innings. He basically lost this entire year to injury, and this was a key year for his development. He should pitch in the AFL, and if not, you are looking at next year as another development year as well…
It was Molina yesterday, not Posado.
good point.
Most readers don’t comment, and it’s quality over quantity thing I think. I’d rather read 30-50 somewhat interesting comments than 500+ of garbage, and I think most of the readers here feel the same way.
the best part of this site is that most of the comments are NOT coming from the type of morons that post on Abraham’s blog. this does not include some of the people from here that post over there, and it also doesn’t apply to *some* of the regulars over there, but for the most part the quality of the comments over there is 1 notch below awful.
In addition to the odd 2-pitch restriction with Phil, there’s Henn’s absurd down and in slider to Guillen on Friday night. This is either very bad scouting or very bad coaching. Unfortunately, it’s probably both. You work inside early in the count to set up hitters for the stuff away later in the count. You don’t throw anything inner half on a “go” pitch, such as a 2 strike count. This is fundamental yet Yankees pitchers have been doing this since Mel was coaching. Kaat used to bemoan it (even though he would never explicitly call out Mel or Joe for this).
the best part of this site is that most of the comments are NOT coming from the type of morons that post on Abraham’s blog.
somehow i feel like the exception.
Hughes overrated, Alex is unclutch, Abreu sucks, trade Melky, Cano is playing way over his head, Jeter plays stellar defense, Giambi clogs bases, Damon sucks, Mo is losing it, Torre sucks, Damon sucks, Farnsworth sucks, Betemit is AAAA player, Phillips is AAAA player, Mussina sucks, Yankees suck.
Otherwise, uh, panic.
there’s Henn’s absurd down and in slider to Guillen on Friday night.
Watching the highlights, that was so not a strike, I guess Guillen is a free swinger so it might have been in his zone, but it seem like an okay, though heartbreaking, pitch. I just wished Torre pitched some of the guys for more than one freakin inning.
Posted this on a few threads here:
Brackman to have surgery.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08272007/sports/yankees/yanks__top_pick_to_have_surger.htm
Next entry: Set Five
Previous entry: New York Yankees(72-57) at Detroit Tigers(69-60), 7:05pm ***Liveblog/Game Chatter***
There are currently 73 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.












