The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Looking Ahead to 2009: Johnny Damon

When the Yankees signed Johnny Damon after 2005, I hated it. I hated it for emotional reasons primarily, but also because I felt he was a poor risk to be productive offensively and defensively through age 35. Heading into 2009 and the final year of his contract, let's take a look at Damon's value to this point.

Player Year Age Pos PA AVG OBP SLG BR BRAR zr rs uzr rs avg rs WAR Value Salary Difference
Johnny Damon 2006 32 cf 669 .285 .359 .482 101.0 40 4 -7 -2 3.8 $19,014,058 $13,000,000 $6,014,058
Johnny Damon 2007 33 cf 604 .270 .351 .396 78.5 11 -1 7 3 1.4 $7,397,618 $13,000,000 -$5,602,383
Johnny Damon 2008 34 lf 621 .303 .375 .461 95.3 36 -1 3 1 3.7 $20,313,310 $13,000,000 $7,313,310
Total 1894 .286 .362 .448 274.9 87 2 3 2 8.9 $46,724,985 $39,000,000 $7,724,985


I'm assuming a marginal win for the Yankees was worth $5M in 2006, $5.25M in 2007, and $5.5M in 2008. With that assumption, so far the Damon contract has been worth it and then some.

For information about the projections being used and the acronyms in the tables below, check out the first and second posts in this series.

2008
After a poor 2007, Damon looked like he was on the verge of collapse. Offensively, he slugged under .400 for the first time since his age 23 season, and defensively his range in CF appeared to decline drastically and his poor arm seemed to get even worse. CF also seemed to be taking a physical toll on Damon. Because of all that, the Yankees officially moved Damon to LF to start 2008.

PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BR BR/650 BRAR/650 wOBA
2008 chone 598 535 97 148 26 3 16 63 17 5 60 78 3 .277 .353 .426 80 87 26 .334
2008 marcel 570 507 89 142 28 3 13 63 20 4 54 75 3 .280 .349 .424 76 87 27 .329
2008 pecota 534 471 76 131 25 3 11 59 15 4 55 69 3 .278 .354 .417 70 85 25 .330
2008 zips 575 519 93 145 25 3 12 67 17 4 54 73 2 .279 .350 .408 74 83 23 .327
2008 cairo 647 575 101 165 29 4 17 74 21 5 64 81 3 .287 .358 .437 90 90 30 .338
2008 average 585 523 92 147 27 3 14 66 18 4 58 75 3 .280 .354 .424 78 87 27 .333
2008 actual 623 555 95 168 27 5 17 71 29 8 64 82 1 .303 .374 .461 94 98 38 .355
difference 7% 6% 3% 8% -4% 46% 15% 2% 50% 71% 5% 3% -65% .022 .020 .038 15 11 11 .021


Damon's projections were slightly pessimistic, pegging him to hit for an average line of .280/.354/.424, and projecting him to be worth around 2.4 wins above replacement. It's worth noting that the deadly accurate CAIRO projection system was the closest. Yay CAIRO! Damon instead was worth 3.6 wins above replacement offensively,

Offense
Here's how Damon projects in 2009.

PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BR BR/650 BRAR/650 wOBA
2009 chone 615 551 97 152 27 3 15 65 19 5 62 81 2 .276 .351 .417 81 85 25 .330
2009 marcel 572 507 84 140 26 3 15 62 22 6 58 80 1 .276 .348 .428 77 87 27 .329
2009 pecota 549 486 80 136 26 4 12 62 22 6 55 77 3 .280 .353 .423 74 87 27 .331
2009 tht 573 512 74 140 26 3 13 61 2 22 59 80 2 .273 .351 .412 64 73 13 .328
2009 zips 628 564 99 164 30 4 15 69 2 25 62 78 2 .291 .363 .438 77 79 19 .342
2009 cairo 634 564 102 159 30 4 16 69 22 6 63 84 2 .282 .354 .433 87 89 28 .335
2009 average 595 532 90 149 27 4 14 65 15 12 60 80 2 .280 .355 .426 77 84 23 .334


The projections are expecting Damon to fall off by about a win and a half. I do expect him to fall off some, although perhaps not quite that much.

Here are his CAIRO percentile forecasts.

cairo percentiles PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP AVG OBP SLG BR BR/650 BRAR/650 wOBA
80% 647 575 114 175 36 7 20 79 28 4 73 77 4 .304 .389 .494 108 108 48 .372
65% 641 569 108 167 33 6 18 74 25 5 68 80 3 .293 .371 .464 97 99 38 .353
baseline 634 564 102 159 30 4 16 69 22 6 63 84 2 .282 .354 .433 87 89 28 .335
35% 603 536 92 145 25 3 13 62 19 7 56 84 1 .271 .336 .403 73 79 19 .316
20% 552 490 80 127 21 2 10 53 15 7 48 81 1 .260 .319 .373 59 69 9 .297


Defense
It doesn't seem like the Yankees are entertaining the idea of putting Damon back in CF, although it'd be a way to get the best offense on the field. Since it's still a remote possibility, here are Damon's ZRs and UZRS going back to 2005.

Year Age Pos GP Inn RS (ZR) RS (UZR) Avg (ZR/UZR) p162
2005 31 CF 147 1225 0 -8 -4 -5
2006 32 CF 131 1087 1 -7 -3 -4
2007 33 CF 48 377 1 2 1 5
2008 34 CF 34 285 0 -6 -3 -14
2009 35 CF 89 722 0 -4 -2 -4


That doesn't include his arm, which probably costs about five runs a season.

Damon's LF statistics suffer from small sample size, but here they are anyway.

Year Age Pos GP Inn RS (ZR) RS (UZR) Avg (ZR/UZR) p162
2005 31 LF 0 0 0 0 0 0
2006 32 LF 0 0 0 0 0 0
2007 33 LF 32 271 0 6 3 16
2008 34 LF 87 659 -3 8 2 5
2009 35 LF 81 612 -2 5 2 4


UZR likes Damon's defense more than ZR. As discussed in the Jeter thread, that probably means he saw a more difficult distribution of fieldable chances.

Dates Player TM LG Pos G INN Ch PM ZR Diff RS
Through June 16 Damon, Johnny NYY AL LF 54 443.2 119 106 .891 6 5
After June 16 Damon, Johnny NYY AL LF 33 215.9 58 42 .724 -8 -7
Total Damon, Johnny NYY AL LF 87 659.1 177 148 .836 -2 -2


Damon's zone rating was solid through June 16, then tanked. I blame Snacks Pontoon.

It's probably a safe assumption that Damon should be average or slightly above in LF defensively when looking at the combination of his CF and LF projections. A rough rule of thumb is that a league average CF should be anywhere from 10-15 runs above average in LF.

Baserunning
Year GA_OPPS EQGAR AA_OPPS EQAAR HA_OPPS EQHAR OA_OPPS EQOAR OPPS EQBRR
2007 41 0.4 42 1.7 60 2.0 371 -0.4 514 7.5
2008 46 -0.2 54 -1.1 55 -0.5 411 1.3 566 0.0
2009 Proj 44 0.0 50 -0.1 57 0.3 398 0.7 549 2.5


Damon was one of the better baserunners in the league in 2007 but fell to average in 2008. He should probably be somewhere close to that projection if he's healthy.

Value
Well, we already touched on Damon's value to this point, so let's see what the projections see as the final verdict on the Damon contract.

Category Runs Wins
Offense 23 2.3
Defense 2 0.2
Baserunning 3 0.3
Total 28 2.8
2009 Salary $13,000,000
Value if:a marginal win is worth: Value Difference
$3,000,000 $8,271,727 ($4,728,273)
$3,500,000 $9,650,348 ($3,349,652)
$4,000,000 $11,028,969 ($1,971,031)
$4,500,000 $12,407,590 ($592,410)
$5,000,000 $13,786,212 $786,212
$5,500,000 $15,164,833 $2,164,833
$6,000,000 $16,543,454 $3,543,454


It looks like the Yankees will end up ahead on the Damon deal unless disaster strikes.

Conclusion
Damon's possibly playing for his last MLB contract so I think he'll do whatever he can to have a big year. The news that Joe Girardi is going to bat him 2nd this year behind Derek Jeter seems like a smart move. I'd be curious to see the stats of lefty batters with 1B occupied, but I don't have time to run the data right now. Anyway, it makes sense because it splits up the possible Gardner/Damon lefty bottleneck between 9 and 1 and it moves Damon's power down a slot where it should be more advantageous, since he should see more opportunities with runners on.

I didn't think it would happen, but I've warmed up to Damon. I probably wouldn't bring him back in 2010, but he's been solid as a Yank.

It looks like the season is dawning on us faster than I'll be able to get through all the players, but I'll try to double and triple them up to get through them. Also, I expect to have the Diamond Mind Projection Blowout posted early next week.
--Posted at 11:55 pm by SG / 106 Comments | - (330)

Comments

Page 2 of 2 pages:  <  1 2

I’ll settle for the Melky equivalent an infieler. A 22-23 year old AAA type who has hit a snag at the big league level and may need a change of scenery. For 2009, the Yankees are about as deep as you can expect to be in the OF, but are ready to fall off a cliff if any (more) trouble comes up in the infield.

Actually, forget I said settle… I’d “love” that kind of a player. I’m not sure that one exists, however. Jeff Baker? A little old, but he’d be a nice depth piece.

We should go real time with Gardner’s ZR.. I’m willing to bet he’s not as much of a fall off as he’s being projected from his out-of-this-world SSS numbers.

The thing is if you make that kind of trade, then you’re pretty much committed to keeping the Jeff Baker equivalent on the active roster.  OTOH, if you trade Melky for dreck, then it means you’re going with Berroa or Pena.  Not a lot of good options here.

Then again, Berroa’s not on the 40-man either.  One way or another, they have to make some kind of roster move to make room for a utility infielder until Rodriguez is back.

you are right, but my point was that once A-Rod comes back, unless you are ready to cut Ransom, you can never get Pena’s spot back.

A-Rod comes back, you can send Pena down, your 40 man is still full and you’ve used a spot prematurely on Pena.

if it’s Berroa, once A-Rod comes back, you can release him and you have that spot for the inevitable addition of someone like Melancon.

Was Nady left off because he spent his time in Pitt in RF but most of in NY in LF?  In general is there a huge difference (other than arm) between a LF and RF when evaluating for a corner outfield spot?  To be more direct, is there any reason why his (or anyone elses) time in RF shouldn’t count?

Yeah, I should have included it but I just did a quick pull of year = 2008 and position = LF.  There’s really no reason RF/LF time should not be lumped together, offensively or defensively, aside from arm maybe.

SG- Are you citing the WAR values in dollars for the Yankees assuming they are inflated?
Yeah, since the Yankees are the highest revenue team in the game a marginal win should be worth more to them.

The current WAR in millions is 4.5 according to “The Book” blog.

I’m not sure how the economy is affecting that, which is why I put a range from $3M to $6M.

Page 2 of 2 pages:  <  1 2
0 of 963 registered readers are currently logged in.
There are currently 70 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.

Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*