Friday, March 7, 2008
Looking Ahead to 2008 - The Bench
We've gone through the likely starters for the 2008 Yankees, so now it's time to take a look at the guys on the bench. I won't look back at 2007 for these guys, I'll just look at what they project to do this year.Wilson Betemit
Scott Proctor and his tattered arm were shipped to Los Angeles of Los Angeles last season to acquire Betemit. Betemit's a fairly young player who was once a highly touted prospect in the Braves' farm system. Although he's a switch-hitter, he has exhibited a very significant platoon split in his career.
Vs RHP: .268/.347/.464 in 800 PA
Vs LHP: .232/.281/.353 in 227 PA
Now, 227 plate appearances aren't enough to give us a solid window of Betemit's actual skill vs LHP. The sigma on his OPS vs lefties is .149, so we can say we can estimate his true talent OPS against lefties to be somewhere in the range of .485 - .783. So it's tough to say that Betemit is really a platoon player just yet.
Here's how Betemit's 2008 projections look. I am comparing him to the average 3B here.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 368 | 331 | 46 | 84 | 17 | 1 | 14 | 41 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 89 | 1 | .254 | .329 | .438 | -1 | 9 |
| marcel | 383 | 338 | 47 | 90 | 19 | 1 | 14 | 51 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 89 | 1 | .266 | .339 | .453 | 2 | 12 |
| pecota | 265 | 234 | 31 | 60 | 13 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 69 | 1 | .255 | .331 | .437 | -1 | 6 |
| zips | 336 | 301 | 42 | 78 | 17 | 1 | 14 | 46 | 1 | 1 | 34 | 86 | 1 | .259 | .336 | .462 | 2 | 11 |
| cairo | 228 | 200 | 30 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 51 | 1 | .254 | .326 | .428 | -2 | 4 |
| average | 316 | 281 | 39 | 72 | 15 | 1 | 12 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 77 | 1 | .258 | .332 | .443 | 0 | 8 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 228 | 200 | 35 | 58 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 27 | 44 | 2 | .290 | .382 | .530 | 9 | 15 |
| 65% | 228 | 200 | 33 | 55 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 47 | 1 | .272 | .354 | .479 | 3 | 9 |
| Baseline | 228 | 200 | 30 | 51 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 51 | 1 | .254 | .326 | .428 | -2 | 4 |
| 35% | 228 | 200 | 27 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 54 | 0 | .236 | .298 | .377 | -7 | -1 |
| 20% | 228 | 200 | 24 | 44 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 58 | 0 | .219 | .270 | .326 | -13 | -7 |
Betemit projects to hit about as well as an average 3B. which is pretty damn good for a backup IF.
Defensively, Betemit could see some time at first base depending on how the great Giambi experiment pans out, or in the late innings for defense, but right now his primarily role will be backing up the entire infield. He's a good bat for an infielder, but reviews are mixed on his defense. The numbers aren't great, but we have the small sample size issue to contend with.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 1B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 14 | 9 | 74 | 67 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 18 | .778 | -1 | -1 | -18 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 77 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 10 | 9 | 69 | 26 | 20 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 22 | .773 | -1 | -1 | -15 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | .857 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | 2B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | .000 | -2 | -1 | -291 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 22 | 7 | 4 | 39 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 1.000 | 2 | 1 | 47 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 63 | 46 | 431 | 26 | 94 | 6 | 6 | 103 | 124 | .831 | 5 | 4 | 13 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 30 | 20 | 204 | 8 | 40 | 3 | 9 | 41 | 51 | .804 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| 2006 | NL | LA | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 49 | 45 | 398 | 24 | 83 | 4 | 9 | 83 | 109 | .761 | -3 | -2 | -7 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 14 | 5 | 56 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 19 | .789 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | 3B | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 53 | 39 | 353 | 20 | 60 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 86 | .721 | -4 | -4 | -15 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 22 | 11 | 7 | 75 | 12 | 30 | 3 | 5 | 29 | 35 | .829 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| 2005 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 23 | 25 | 10 | 136 | 24 | 40 | 1 | 10 | 36 | 48 | .750 | -4 | -3 | -36 |
| 2006 | NL | Atl | SS | Wilson Betemit | 24 | 18 | 10 | 92 | 20 | 33 | 5 | 10 | 27 | 40 | .675 | -6 | -5 | -75 |
| 2007 | AL | NYY | SS | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 8 | 4 | 39 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | .889 | 1 | 0 | 17 |
| 2007 | NL | LA | SS | Wilson Betemit | 26 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Projection | 1B | 14 | 9 | 223 | 67 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 14 | 18 | .778 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Projection | 2B | 4 | 4 | 92 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | .791 | -2 | -2 | -27 | ||||
| Projection | 3B | 43 | 32 | 896 | 17 | 59 | 4 | 6 | 62 | 79 | .779 | -1 | 0 | -1 | ||||
| Projection | SS | 15 | 7 | 239 | 15 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 30 | .750 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
I debated including the defensive numbers for any of the bench candidates since there are sample size issues, but I'll present them with the caveat that there is not enough data to make any definitive assessment of what they may tell us. I'd say Betemit is a decent glove at third and first and probably a bit stretched in the middle infield although he can handle it. Betemit's a lock to be on the roster, and for good reason. He could very well be the best backup infielder in baseball.
Jose Molina
After the Wil Nieves Experience™ got to be too much, the Yankees picked up Molina mid-season from the hated Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for Jeff Kennard. Molina's not a good hitter, but that's why he's a backup catcher. Here are his projections for 2008, prepare to be underwhelmed.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 267 | 254 | 28 | 61 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 57 | 1 | .240 | .277 | .370 | -3 | 3 |
| marcel | 326 | 299 | 30 | 74 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 64 | 2 | .247 | .285 | .371 | -2 | 4 |
| pecota | 170 | 155 | 14 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 1 | .240 | .278 | .346 | -3 | 1 |
| zips | 203 | 194 | 17 | 47 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 44 | 1 | .242 | .276 | .340 | -4 | 1 |
| cairo | 222 | 203 | 21 | 49 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 1 | .242 | .281 | .362 | -2 | 2 |
| average | 238 | 221 | 22 | 54 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 49 | 1 | .242 | .279 | .358 | -3 | 2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 222 | 203 | 25 | 56 | 14 | 1 | 6 | 29 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 37 | 3 | .276 | .333 | .450 | 7 | 12 |
| 65% | 222 | 203 | 23 | 53 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 40 | 2 | .259 | .307 | .406 | 2 | 7 |
| Baseline | 222 | 203 | 21 | 49 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 1 | .242 | .281 | .362 | -2 | 2 |
| 35% | 222 | 203 | 18 | 46 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 47 | 1 | .224 | .254 | .318 | -7 | -3 |
| 20% | 222 | 203 | 16 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 50 | 0 | .207 | .228 | .274 | -12 | -7 |
Pray for Jorge Posada's continued good health, although to be fair Molina's defense might make him worthy of a roster spot.
| Year | Last | First | Tm | Lg | Inn | SB | CS | CS% | PBWPR | TER | FER | Tot R | R/140 |
| 2004 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 524 | 23 | 19 | 45% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 14 |
| 2005 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 480 | 19 | 18 | 49% | -3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 2006 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 603 | 27 | 19 | 41% | -5 | 0 | -2 | -4 | -8 |
| 2007 | Molina | Jose | LAA | AL | 323 | 18 | 7 | 28% | 0 | -1 | 0 | -2 | -8 |
| 2007 | Molina | Jose | NYA | AL | 169 | 13 | 5 | 28% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Projection | Molina | Jose | NYA | AL | 428 | 20 | 14 | 40% | -2 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -8 |
Molina projects to be below average defensively, mainly due to a poor projection on passed balls and wild pitches. His throwing and error rate are about average. Maybe he can recover some of that 2004 defensive magic.
Although Francisco Cervelli has had a couple of promising seasons in the minors, Molina's probably got his spot on the bench locked up this year.
Morgan Ensberg
Ensberg is coming off a very disappointing season after hitting 59 HRs and walking 186 times combined over 2005 and 2006. His performance was attributed at least partially to a shoulder injury. If that was indeed the case and he is healthy now, he has a lot of upside as not just a bench player, but as a potential starting first baseman. Here's how Ensberg projects for 2008 as compared to an average 1B.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 420 | 356 | 54 | 86 | 16 | 1 | 15 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 61 | 82 | 3 | .242 | .357 | .419 | -3 | 8 |
| marcel | 412 | 346 | 56 | 87 | 17 | 1 | 17 | 54 | 3 | 3 | 59 | 81 | 3 | .251 | .362 | .454 | 1 | 12 |
| pecota | 277 | 229 | 38 | 57 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 38 | 2 | 1 | 42 | 57 | 2 | .249 | .367 | .457 | 2 | 9 |
| zips | 475 | 395 | 60 | 96 | 18 | 1 | 20 | 59 | 1 | 3 | 76 | 105 | 4 | .243 | .371 | .446 | 1 | 14 |
| cairo | 431 | 363 | 56 | 93 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 58 | 2 | 3 | 62 | 77 | 3 | .255 | .366 | .459 | 2 | 14 |
| average | 403 | 338 | 53 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 16 | 51 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 81 | 3 | .248 | .365 | .447 | 0 | 12 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 431 | 363 | 63 | 102 | 22 | 3 | 22 | 65 | 3 | 1 | 70 | 68 | 5 | .282 | .411 | .538 | 17 | 29 |
| 65% | 431 | 363 | 59 | 97 | 20 | 2 | 20 | 62 | 3 | 2 | 66 | 73 | 4 | .268 | .388 | .499 | 10 | 22 |
| Baseline | 431 | 363 | 56 | 93 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 58 | 2 | 3 | 62 | 77 | 3 | .255 | .366 | .459 | 2 | 14 |
| 35% | 431 | 363 | 52 | 88 | 16 | 1 | 16 | 54 | 1 | 4 | 58 | 82 | 2 | .242 | .344 | .419 | -6 | 6 |
| 20% | 431 | 363 | 48 | 83 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 50 | 1 | 5 | 54 | 86 | 1 | .229 | .321 | .379 | -14 | -2 |
Again, we don't know how healthy he is, but the projections are pretty encouraging and there is some upside here.
Also of note are Ensberg's career splits. Versus lefties he has hit .284/.406/.530 in his career over 686 PA, compared to .258/.350/.456 versus righties. Even in his down 2007 he hit .257/.345/.486 versus lefties.
Ensberg's primarily played 3B in his career, but I think he should be reasonably competent at first base because of that infield experience. Here are his career defensive numbers at 3B.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 27 | 43 | 37 | 328 | 28 | 76 | 8 | 5 | 80 | 110 | .727 | -5 | -4 | -16 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 27 | 111 | 89 | 818 | 77 | 184 | 9 | 18 | 195 | 248 | .786 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 28 | 118 | 103 | 921 | 80 | 164 | 13 | 23 | 180 | 243 | .741 | -7 | -6 | -9 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 29 | 148 | 147 | 1286 | 100 | 296 | 15 | 31 | 324 | 403 | .804 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 30 | 117 | 106 | 975 | 80 | 230 | 12 | 25 | 247 | 301 | .821 | 11 | 9 | 13 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 32 | 68 | 52 | 492 | 36 | 107 | 11 | 12 | 118 | 161 | .733 | -6 | -5 | -15 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | 3B | Morgan Ensberg | 32 | 12 | 10 | 93 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 32 | .906 | 4 | 3 | 53 |
| 3B | 102 | 91 | 2474 | 67 | 183 | 11 | 20 | 198 | 252 | .786 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
I'd worry about how Ensberg may handle scooping throws, but other than that I think anyone that can play an average 3B should at the very least be average at 1B. Couple that with a bat that projects around average and with a tendency for lefty-mashing, and Ensberg seems like a good guy to have on the bench as well.
Shelley Duncan
The man, the myth, the legend. Duncan scuffled around the minors for most of his career until breaking through in 2007 and getting a shot at the majors as a 27 year old rookie. Duncan slammed 7 HRs in 74 MLB at bats and ended the season with a line of .257/.329/.554. Duncan's projections for 2008 aren't very good because of his lackluster performance in the minors before 2007.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 465 | 425 | 58 | 98 | 19 | 1 | 21 | 60 | 2 | 2 | 36 | 113 | 4 | .231 | .297 | .428 | -11 | 2 |
| marcel | 242 | 215 | 35 | 58 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 45 | 2 | .270 | .339 | .465 | 0 | 7 |
| pecota | 460 | 412 | 51 | 98 | 19 | 1 | 21 | 70 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 112 | 4 | .239 | .308 | .439 | -7 | 5 |
| zips | 446 | 405 | 45 | 98 | 18 | 1 | 24 | 74 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 103 | 3 | .242 | .312 | .469 | -4 | 9 |
| cairo | 369 | 334 | 44 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 77 | 2 | .250 | .316 | .477 | -2 | 9 |
| average | 396 | 358 | 48 | 88 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 59 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 88 | 3 | .246 | .314 | .456 | -4 | 7 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 369 | 334 | 51 | 93 | 20 | 2 | 24 | 66 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 69 | 4 | .278 | .360 | .560 | 12 | 23 |
| 65% | 369 | 334 | 47 | 88 | 18 | 1 | 22 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 73 | 3 | .264 | .338 | .518 | 5 | 16 |
| Baseline | 369 | 334 | 44 | 84 | 16 | 1 | 19 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 77 | 2 | .250 | .316 | .477 | -2 | 9 |
| 35% | 369 | 334 | 41 | 79 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 82 | 2 | .236 | .294 | .435 | -9 | 2 |
| 20% | 369 | 334 | 37 | 74 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 51 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 86 | 1 | .223 | .272 | .393 | -16 | -5 |
I think Duncan may be better than what those numbers show because I think he made some adjustments in his game that allowed him to play like he did in 2007. I can see him as a .250/.320/.480 type hitter with HR power, and that's a damn fine bench player.
Defensively, we don't have much data on Duncan, but the scouting reports see him as a below average defender at either first base or the OF corners.
Jason Lane
Lane's a long-shot to make the roster. He's a similar player to Shelley Duncan, but 3 years older and with a couple of bad seasons in his recent past (.201/.318/.392 in 2006 and .175/.254/.345 in 2007). Despite being a righty he doesn't have a huge platoon split (.768 OPS vs RPH, .779 vs LHP). His projections for 2008, as you may imagine, are a little ugly.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 407 | 363 | 48 | 87 | 18 | 1 | 14 | 46 | 2 | 2 | 40 | 74 | 4 | .240 | .322 | .410 | -8 | 3 |
| marcel | 332 | 294 | 39 | 68 | 14 | 1 | 13 | 44 | 3 | 2 | 30 | 63 | 3 | .231 | .304 | .418 | -7 | 2 |
| pecota | 321 | 285 | 35 | 66 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 43 | 4 | 1 | 28 | 61 | 3 | .232 | .302 | .404 | -8 | 1 |
| zips | 434 | 391 | 46 | 90 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 56 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 88 | 5 | .230 | .306 | .402 | -11 | 1 |
| cairo | 342 | 302 | 39 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 3 | .245 | .319 | .434 | -4 | 5 |
| average | 367 | 327 | 41 | 77 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 47 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 69 | 4 | .236 | .311 | .413 | -8 | 2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 342 | 302 | 45 | 83 | 20 | 2 | 17 | 53 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 54 | 5 | .274 | .365 | .518 | 9 | 18 |
| 65% | 342 | 302 | 42 | 78 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 49 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 58 | 4 | .259 | .342 | .476 | 2 | 12 |
| Baseline | 342 | 302 | 39 | 74 | 16 | 1 | 13 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 62 | 3 | .245 | .319 | .434 | -4 | 5 |
| 35% | 342 | 302 | 36 | 70 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 43 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 66 | 2 | .231 | .295 | .392 | -11 | -2 |
| 20% | 342 | 302 | 33 | 65 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 39 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 70 | 1 | .217 | .272 | .350 | -18 | -9 |
Defensively, Lane does have the ability to play CF which Duncan does not. However, he doesn't grade well defensively if you believe zone rating.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | 1B | Jason Lane | 27 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | 1B | Jason Lane | 29 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 26 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 53 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 26 | 6 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .500 | -1 | -1 | -78 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 27 | 17 | 3 | 49 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10 | .700 | -2 | -1 | -39 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 28 | 6 | 4 | 37 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 13 | .846 | 0 | 0 | -13 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 29 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | .833 | 0 | 0 | -15 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | CF | Jason Lane | 31 | 36 | 27 | 261 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 88 | .875 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | CF | Jason Lane | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 137 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 26 | 11 | 1 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 0 | 28 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 26 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 27 | 35 | 6 | 102 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 24 | .917 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 28 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | .429 | -3 | -3 | -153 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 29 | 6 | 1 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 43 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | LF | Jason Lane | 31 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 26 | 27 | 16 | 151 | 39 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 49 | .796 | -4 | -4 | -35 |
| 2003 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 26 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| 2004 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 27 | 24 | 13 | 141 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 31 | .871 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 28 | 137 | 126 | 1116 | 225 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 203 | 248 | .819 | -13 | -11 | -14 |
| 2006 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 29 | 89 | 73 | 679 | 155 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 183 | .814 | -11 | -9 | -19 |
| 2007 | NL | Hou | RF | Jason Lane | 31 | 18 | 15 | 128 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 47 | .851 | -1 | -1 | -13 |
| 2007 | NL | SD | RF | Jason Lane | 31 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 32 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | CF | 32 | 16 | 9 | 285 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 31 | .859 | -4 | -3 | -17 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | LF | 32 | 9 | 2 | 86 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | .843 | -4 | -4 | -62 | |
| Projection | AL | NYY | RF | 32 | 57 | 48 | 1314 | 98 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 91 | 111 | .823 | -6 | -5 | -5 |
I'd have a tough time building a case for Lane over Ensberg or Duncan, unless the Yankees need an OF more than they need a backup corner IF.
Nick Green
The triumphant return of a Yankee legend. Green's the prototypical utility player. He projects to be bad on offense.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 388 | 358 | 43 | 85 | 16 | 2 | 12 | 44 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 101 | 5 | .237 | .296 | .394 | -9 | 1 |
| marcel | 216 | 189 | 27 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 19 | 49 | 4 | .238 | .315 | .360 | -5 | 0 |
| pecota | 457 | 410 | 47 | 97 | 21 | 2 | 12 | 51 | 6 | 4 | 34 | 129 | 6 | .237 | .300 | .385 | -10 | 1 |
| zips | 370 | 341 | 36 | 88 | 17 | 2 | 11 | 38 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 90 | 4 | .258 | .316 | .416 | -4 | 6 |
| cairo | 265 | 237 | 30 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 57 | 4 | .266 | .321 | .418 | -2 | 5 |
| average | 339 | 306 | 37 | 76 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 83 | 5 | .247 | .310 | .395 | -6 | 3 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 265 | 237 | 35 | 71 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 49 | 6 | .299 | .374 | .511 | 10 | 16 |
| 65% | 265 | 237 | 33 | 67 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 53 | 5 | .283 | .348 | .464 | 4 | 10 |
| Baseline | 265 | 237 | 30 | 63 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 57 | 4 | .266 | .321 | .418 | -2 | 5 |
| 35% | 265 | 237 | 27 | 59 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 61 | 3 | .249 | .294 | .371 | -8 | -1 |
| 20% | 265 | 237 | 24 | 55 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 65 | 2 | .232 | .267 | .325 | -14 | -7 |
He can play pretty much any infield position, although not necessarily all that well.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 1B | Nick Green | 27 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 194 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 2B | Nick Green | 25 | 75 | 61 | 572 | 137 | 203 | 8 | 44 | 187 | 222 | .842 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 2005 | AL | TB | 2B | Nick Green | 26 | 91 | 83 | 731 | 141 | 195 | 4 | 44 | 186 | 240 | .775 | -11 | -8 | -16 |
| 2006 | AL | TB | 2B | Nick Green | 27 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | .778 | 0 | 0 | -14 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 2B | Nick Green | 27 | 19 | 11 | 103 | 37 | 29 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 35 | .743 | -3 | -2 | -30 |
| 2007 | AL | Sea | 2B | Nick Green | 29 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| 2004 | NL | Atl | 3B | Nick Green | 25 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | AL | TB | 3B | Nick Green | 26 | 13 | 11 | 104 | 4 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 30 | .767 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | 3B | Nick Green | 27 | 17 | 8 | 80 | 7 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 27 | .704 | -2 | -1 | -25 |
| 2006 | AL | TB | SS | Nick Green | 27 | 10 | 7 | 67 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 28 | .786 | -1 | -1 | -17 |
| 2006 | AL | NYY | SS | Nick Green | 27 | 10 | 3 | 35 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 15 | .733 | -1 | -1 | -42 |
| 2007 | AL | Sea | SS | Nick Green | 29 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 65 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 2B | 38 | 32 | 853 | 63 | 85 | 2 | 19 | 79 | 99 | .799 | -2 | -2 | -3 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 3B | 13 | 7 | 213 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 22 | .739 | -1 | 0 | -3 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | SS | 6 | 3 | 86 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 | .795 | 0 | 0 | -8 |
Green is probably the best choice if the Yankees decide they want a second backup middle infielder, although if they carry 12 pitchers that may make it tough to squeeze him on.
Chris Woodward
Take Nick Green and make him worse and make him a few years older and you have Chris Woodward.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 242 | 222 | 23 | 52 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 51 | 1 | .234 | .298 | .333 | -9 | -3 |
| marcel | 301 | 268 | 32 | 64 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 61 | 2 | .239 | .299 | .351 | -10 | -2 |
| pecota | 84 | 75 | 8 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 1 | .240 | .310 | .333 | -3 | 0 |
| zips | 179 | 165 | 18 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 40 | 1 | .224 | .285 | .321 | -8 | -3 |
| cairo | 238 | 212 | 23 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 48 | 1 | .231 | .286 | .330 | -10 | -4 |
| average | 209 | 188 | 21 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 43 | 1 | .234 | .295 | .334 | -8 | -2 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 238 | 212 | 28 | 56 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 41 | 2 | .264 | .337 | .412 | 0 | 6 |
| 65% | 238 | 212 | 25 | 53 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 45 | 2 | .248 | .311 | .371 | -5 | 1 |
| Baseline | 238 | 212 | 23 | 49 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 48 | 1 | .231 | .286 | .330 | -10 | -4 |
| 35% | 238 | 212 | 21 | 46 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 51 | 1 | .215 | .260 | .289 | -14 | -8 |
| 20% | 238 | 212 | 18 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 55 | 0 | .198 | .234 | .248 | -19 | -13 |
Woodward has seen some spot duty in the OF which could theoretically give him an edge on Green.
| YEAR | LG | Tm | POS | Player Name | Age | GP | GS | Innings | PO | A | E | DP | PM | CH | ZR | PMAA | RSAA | RS/162 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 1B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 1B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 34 | 21 | 199 | 206 | 10 | 2 | 16 | 30 | 33 | .909 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 1B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 1B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 6 | 4 | 35 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 8 | .875 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 2B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 6 | 3 | 26 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 13 | .846 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 2B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 10 | .700 | -1 | -1 | -41 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 2B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 39 | 33 | 292 | 72 | 93 | 4 | 20 | 76 | 91 | .835 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 2B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 11 | 6 | 54 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 23 | .652 | -4 | -3 | -70 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | 3B | Chris Woodward | 26 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 121 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | 3B | Chris Woodward | 29 | 6 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | .923 | 2 | 1 | 79 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | 3B | Chris Woodward | 30 | 11 | 6 | 66 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 16 | 1.000 | 3 | 3 | 60 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | 3B | Chris Woodward | 31 | 24 | 6 | 100 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 16 | .813 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 2002 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 26 | 79 | 77 | 678 | 134 | 231 | 13 | 64 | 208 | 240 | .867 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| 2003 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 27 | 103 | 98 | 871 | 161 | 300 | 17 | 69 | 279 | 335 | .833 | -3 | -3 | -4 |
| 2004 | AL | Tor | SS | Chris Woodward | 28 | 64 | 60 | 515 | 87 | 171 | 5 | 42 | 163 | 195 | .836 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| 2005 | NL | NYM | SS | Chris Woodward | 29 | 7 | 3 | 33 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | .857 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2006 | NL | NYM | SS | Chris Woodward | 30 | 13 | 11 | 97 | 13 | 33 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 35 | .829 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| 2007 | NL | Atl | SS | Chris Woodward | 31 | 13 | 5 | 67 | 7 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 20 | .850 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Projection | AL | NYY | 1B | 11 | 7 | 192 | 63 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 11 | .901 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 2B | 18 | 14 | 362 | 29 | 38 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 40 | .788 | -1 | -1 | -4 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | 3B | 14 | 5 | 196 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 15 | .905 | 2 | 2 | 12 | ||
| Projection | AL | NYY | SS | 31 | 26 | 712 | 40 | 79 | 4 | 20 | 73 | 87 | .839 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Woodward brings a slightly better glove than Green it would appear, but a worse bat. He's probably not a good bet to make the team although I have a hunch he could sneak his way on with a hot spring.
Brett Gardner
Gardner's a long shot to start the season in the Bronx. He's shown pretty good OBP skills in the minors and he's supposed to be top of the scouting scale fast, but he has no power at all which is not a good sign for his major league future.
| Projection | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| chone | 469 | 427 | 55 | 108 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 35 | 9 | 40 | 91 | 2 | .253 | .320 | .328 | -13 | -1 |
| marcel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 |
| pecota | 483 | 428 | 58 | 102 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 31 | 25 | 7 | 44 | 100 | 3 | .238 | .308 | .318 | -18 | -5 |
| zips | 468 | 417 | 73 | 112 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 28 | 9 | 49 | 87 | 2 | .269 | .348 | .331 | -10 | 2 |
| cairo | 325 | 292 | 46 | 74 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 61 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .342 | -9 | -1 |
| average | 349 | 313 | 43 | 79 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 19 | 5 | 33 | 68 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .330 | -10 | -1 |
| CAIRO % | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | HBP | AVG | OBP | SLG | BRAA | BRAR |
| 80% | 325 | 292 | 53 | 83 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 35 | 53 | 3 | .283 | .374 | .413 | 3 | 11 |
| 65% | 325 | 292 | 50 | 78 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 33 | 57 | 3 | .268 | .350 | .378 | -3 | 5 |
| Baseline | 325 | 292 | 46 | 74 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 61 | 2 | .253 | .326 | .342 | -9 | -1 |
| 35% | 325 | 292 | 43 | 70 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 4 | 27 | 65 | 1 | .239 | .302 | .307 | -16 | -7 |
| 20% | 325 | 292 | 39 | 65 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 25 | 69 | 1 | .224 | .278 | .272 | -22 | -13 |
Gardner's defense is apparently not as good as it should be with his speed because of some questionable reads, but I think he's still likely to be a plus defender.
Conclusion
We can probably assume the Yankees start the season with this lineup:
LF - Damon
SS - Jeter
RF - Abreu
3B - Rodriguez
1B - Giambi
C - Posada
DH - Matsui
2B - Cano
CF - Cabrera
We can probably also safely assume that they'll start the season with a 12 man pitching staff, which leaves four roster spots for the bench. Betemit and Molina are locks. I think Ensberg is pretty close to a lock as well, which leaves one spot for Jason Lane or Shelley Duncan or Nick Green or Chris Woodward. Duncan gives them the better bat, although Green and Woodward give them more infield flexibility. Lane is probably the best OF backup defensively since he can play CF, but he seems like the odd man out. If it was me I'd go with Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. Any situation that would require Green or Duncan could be handled without them. If you lose Alex Rodriguez, Ensberg or Betemit can play third. If you lose one of Jeter or Cano, Betemit can cover them. If you lose both Jeter and Cano, Betemit slides to second, Rodriguez to short, and Ensberg to third. If it's a long-term issue the Yankees would have Alberto Gonzalez available to backup around the IF.
The Yankees have similar OF flexibility with Damon as the backup CF, Matsui as the backup corner OF and emergency CF, and Duncan as a fifth OF who can cover the corners in a pinch.
I suppose a pinch runner for Giambi or Posada would be nice, but is that worth a roster spot? If it is I could see Gardner or Justin Christian sneaking on.
I'll take a look at what the Yankee position players add up to as far as runs and wins in my next entry and then it's on to the pitching.
So, like I said, my bench would be Betemit/Molina/Ensberg/Duncan. There's a possibility Hideki Matsui may start the year on the DL which would open up another spot, but let's assume that's not the case for now. If you could take four players for the Yankee bench, who would they be?
Comments
Betemit splits, as presented (emphasis mine):
Vs RHP: .268/.347/.464 in 800 PA
Vs LHP: .232/.281/.634 in 227 PA
Can I assume that you accidentally put Betemit’s LHP OPS where his slugging should be? Otherwise I can’t make sense of these numbers and the ensuing OPS discussion doesn’t jive.
*quickly checks ESPN’s splits*
Yes, this appears to be what has happened.
I was looking over Lane’s numbers earlier in the week. He really doesn’t have a shot. I’d like to see more of Ensberg this spring to get a handle on what he can contribute.
And, of course, by “jive” what I really meant was “jibe.”
Perhaps I am too easily amused, but the idea of trademarking the Wil Nieves Experience had me giggling like a madwoman at work.
Ensberg has seen fairly regular playing time if I’m not mistaken and has shown some pop. A bench of Betemit, Ensberg, Molina and Duncan would really be a strength - although it would leave the team a bit short in terms of having a speedy pinch runner type. On the other hand, when teams bring in a lefty in the late innings to face, say, Abreu, countering with Duncan or Ensberg would certainly give Girardi some good options.
Can I assume that you accidentally put Betemit’s LHP OPS where his slugging should be?
Good catch, I’ll fix it.
What are you base-lining Duncan’s numbers against? As a DH, RF, etc. Probably wouldn’t change the numbers much anyway given his expected playing time, but I’m just curious. I’ve got to think that an average offensive RF on the bench is a plus.
As to which four I would take…I think you’ve nailed it exactly. I can see Cervelli being in the discussion for a backup C next year, but not his. Ditto for Gonzalez as a backup infielder. It would be nice if they could carry only 11 pitchers, but I think until they figure out what they’re going to be able to get from what they have, it makes sense to have the extra pitcher. If everything goes well maybe they can drop down to 11 pitchers sometime in May, and carry either Gardner or Gonzalez for the pinch-runner/extra defensive replacement.
What are you base-lining Duncan’s numbers against? As a DH, RF, etc.
1B.
It would be nice if they could carry only 11 pitchers, but I think until they figure out what they’re going to be able to get from what they have, it makes sense to have the extra pitcher.
I think with the young pitchers carrying 12 to soak up the extra innings makes sense. Hopefully Girardi is more willing to use them than his predecessor.
“Can I assume that you accidentally put Betemit’s LHP OPS where his slugging should be?
Good catch, I’ll fix it.”
Damn.
All the coverage seems to agree that Girardi, & the NYY in general, are very impressed with Duncan both offensively and defensively. Subjectively, from what I’ve seen and heard (including the recent spot on FAN), it’s hard not to root for him. It looks like he’s close to a lock, too, which makes SG’s projection almost a lock.
SG (or anyone else): is a late-inning speedster the advantage it seems in a close game, or am I just tortured with visions of Dave Roberts? The idea of eventually going down to 11 pitchers and adding Gardner seems attractive (except that you probably end up paying for it in pitchers’ minor league options, right?)... how much is it really worth?
I agree with your picks SG, and that would probably be the best bench the Yankees had in AGES.
as for pinch runners, it’s nice and all, but in the course of the regular season it’s pretty worthless if said runner is a bad hitter.
in the regular season you MUCH rather have guys that won’t waste 5PA a game if they’re given a start to rest a starter.
and yes they probably will and should carry 12 pitcher for 2 reason
1. the kids and oldies…. a lot of your guys are unlikely to go too deep in the game.
2. the on going bullpen trial out. let’s face it, we’re NOT going to figure out who REALLY is the best bullpen option in ST until we actually throw them in a real game. might as well carry more guys to throw around and see who works out.
I really think the team needs 12 pitchers. Given that, in order to carry a pinch runner, you have to dump one of Ensberg/Duncan. If Ensberg proves that his injuries have rendered him useless, or if Duncan proves that he really is just a AAA player who got hot for a couple of months, fine, bring up Gardner. But to start the season, I want the guys SG listed for the bench.
is a late-inning speedster the advantage it seems in a close game, or am I just tortured with visions of Dave Roberts?
It’s probably not worth it over a full season, but it is a tactical advantage that can be important in a close game with post-season implications or in the post-season itself. If Giambi or Posada doubles in a tie game in the late innings, it’d be nice to have the option to pinch run for them if needed.
I’m not sure how to quantify it, exactly. Maybe something like Giambi has a 50% chance to score from second on a single whereas pinch runner deluxe has a 90% chance to score? So that could increase your odds of winning the game by 40%.
It will be interesting to see whether or not Girardi lets Giambi remain in the game at 1B in close and late situations. I’m skeptical that he will reflexively pull him for a pinch runner in the 7th inning of a one run or tied game like the previous manager did. If he does let him remain in the game, the need for a pinch runner would be even more attenuated, at least until the playoffs, unless Matsui’s knee continues to be an issue.
well you could do a basic matter and just looking at how many run a good runner typically can create over a season (say use Dave Roberts over the last few year) and take a educated guess of how many times a pinch runner can be used in a season and compare that to a porportion.
I’m not going to look that much. but lets just put it this way, in the mid 70s the A’s signed a guy name Herb Washington as a PURE pinch runner. Washington was a world class track and field star. and he only lasted a little more then a season in the bigs.
I’d definately agree that in a playoff game a great base stealing threat on the bench is a HUGE asset. but in the course of the regular season you can’t possibly waste a roster space purely for that purpose, if that guy doesn’t also bring very significantly value eslewhere then carrying a guy that won’t waste 5PA if given a start is much more valuable.
remember , over the course of a normal season, your very very likely to give something like 900PA give or take a 100 to guys outside of your original starting 9. that’s a TON of PAs it’s quiet obvious to think that a guy who can hit like Wilson Betemit in the course of 300 PA ‘s value difference to ... say a Miguel Cario can’t be made up by base running unless Cairo steal like 50 bags during that span . Cairo is actually a pretty damn good runner. and the Yankees released him for Betemit should just about sum up the value of a pinch runner in the regular season.
in the playoffs however, since your not going to carry the 5th starter and don’t REALLY need that many pitchers. carrying a pinch runner or 2 makes a ton of sense.
I agree that 12 pitchers and Betemit-Ensberg-Molina-Duncan makes sense to start the season. As the pitching shakes out, perhaps then a pitcher can be dropped for Gardner or Gonzalez. I’d personally like to see Gardner on the team at some point just because he sounds like an exciting player to watch. But also important to remember about the “pinch runner” role, Betemit can certainly run a little, and can be expected to do a lot of pinch running/defensive replacementing for whomever is playing first base, especially Giambi. Beyond that, it should also be remembered that given the current configuration of the team, players like Damon, Melky, and Abreu all figure to get regular days off, so on those days they’d make fine pinch runners.
Gardner probably needs at least another half season in AAA, especially as he’s only 24 and needs to play every day and get regular at bats. As I’ve said earlier, Justin Christian basically has the same skill set as Gardner and is soon to be 28 so he would make more sense if the Yanks need that type of guy in 2008.
As for Wilson Betemit, he has five career stolen bases. Although he’s certainly faster than Giambi or Posada, he’s not the guy if the Yanks need to steal a base late in a game.
In any case, I agree that over the course of a long season, it’s better to have a guys who can actually hit like Ensberg or Shelley Duncan than a pinch runner type.
Boy, I hope I didn’t start this conversation! I think if everything shakes out well, the Yankees could be at 11 pitchers later this year, maybe as early as late May. I think they DO need 12 now, but I’m the optimistic sort, who is hoping that everyone pitches so well that the seventh pitcher in the pen is superfluous. Unlikely to happen, but that 98 team worked out pretty well.
IF the Yankees can take a 5th person on the bench, then I would want Gardner (or Christian) or Gonzalez on the bench. The pinch-running would be nice, and there really isn’t a “late inning defensive replacement” many places right now, except maybe 1B. Also, it may be nice to see what the youngsters could do to get a preview of next year.
Betemit, Duncan, Ensberg, and Molina is definitely the best bench to start with, but it would be nice if they could add another player with a different skill-set.
sure, I definately agree that if something shakes out and we could either open a space viva shaking out 1 pitcher or one of the regulars are hurt I’d definately go with either Gonzalez or Gardner / Christian .
of course a lot could change in the course of the season… let say if Giambi’s sudden agil looking nimbleness turn out to break down his 38 year old ex-roiding body as a lot of us would fear by mid May.. and Eric Duncan suddenly remembers how to hit again or Juan Miranda is putting some crooked #.... do you call them up?
A pinch runner would be nice but you need to remember you’re burning 2 players unless the pinch runner takes over the position for who he replaced, leaving a 2 man bench with one being the catcher.
“we can estimate his true talent OPS against lefties to be somewhere in the range of .485 - .783”
SG, you rock.
SG,
I agree with your logical choices for the Yankee bench. One thing you failed to mention, Molina 3 of the last 4 years has hit lefties very well. Last year the Yankees played 39 games against lefty starters so playing Molina against them whenever possible could work out very well. If Posada dh’s with Molina catching the Yankees could put a lineup out with 7 right handed bats with Cano and Damon/Matsui as the lone lefty bats.
if that guy doesn’t also bring very significantly value eslewhere then carrying a guy that won’t waste 5PA if given a start is much more valuable.
The worst hitter you can find only wastes four of those five PA, and a guy who makes your roster primarily to play defense and pinch run is going to get pinch hit for in close and late situations when he starts anyway.
remember , over the course of a normal season, your very very likely to give something like 900PA give or take a 100 to guys outside of your original starting 9.
And how many of those PA go to your original bench? More than half of the position players the Yankees used last season spent some time either in the minors or in other organizations. Same goes for the pitchers. The roster isn’t set in stone on opening day.
The Yankees are going to carry 12 pitchers because that’s what everybody does these days. But that doesn’t make it smart or necessary. Of course, back when I was a kid and ten pitchers was the rule, most teams carried three catchers, which wasn’t exactly smart or necessary either.
Next entry: Spring Training Liveblog - Astros at Yankees: March 7, 1:05 PM ET
Previous entry: Interview with Jonathan Mayo
There are currently 67 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.











