Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Looking Ahead to 2008 - Mike Mussina
Mike Mussina rebounded from a couple of below average seasons in 2004 and 2005 to put up a strong 2006. The Yankees re-signed Moose for two years because of that, and ended up being rewarded with his worst season ever. At age 39 Mussina's career is nearing the finish line, but does he have enough left to help the Yankees in 2008?2007
Mussina's fastball lost a few MPH, and his effectiveness suffered for it. We don't have Pitch F/X data for all of his games in 2007, but for those that we do Moose's average fastball was 86.15 mph, which makes it difficult for a right-handed pitcher to survive in MLB.
| Mike Mussina | ERA | G | IP | Hit | R | ER | HR | BB | K | RSAA | RSAA/200 | H/9 | HR/9 | BB/9 | K/9 |
| Avg Proj | 4.12 | 30 | 182 | 191 | 91 | 83 | 23 | 44 | 145 | 9 | 10 | 9.4 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 7.1 |
| Actual | 5.15 | 28 | 152 | 188 | 90 | 87 | 14 | 35 | 91 | -8 | -11 | 11.1 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 5.4 |
| Difference | 80% | 95% | 83% | -110% | -110% | 85% | 134% | 104% | 75% |
Moose was close to two wins worse than projected. He allowed 17 more runs than expected despite pitching 30 fewer innings than projected. He gave up more hits and homers on a rate basis while fanning 25% fewer batters. Only his walk rate matched expectations.
Moose had an up and down season. In his first six starts, here's how he did:
| GS | W | L | IP | H | HR | R | ER | SO | BB | TBF | Stk% |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 29.0 | 36 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 12 | 6 | 127 | 67.0% |
| FB% | GB% | LD% | ERA | RA | FIP | xFIP | HR/FB | BB/9 | K/9 | RSAA | BABIP |
| 38.2% | 32.4% | 29.4% | 6.52 | 6.52 | 5.23 | 4.92 | 0.13 | 1.9 | 3.7 | -5.1 | .304 |
Moose hurt his hamstring in the second start and missed about 4 weeks. This followed some missed spring time due to the death of his father-in-law, but even when he came back was getting torched, with 29.4% of the batted balls he allowed being scored as line drives. His BABIP was actually lower than you'd expect given that. His walk rate was great, but his K rate was horrible. 13% of the fly balls he allowed went for HRs. During this stretch he faced the Orioles, Twins, Rangers (twice), White Sox and Red Sox. Those teams ranked by 20th, 26th, 19th, 29th and 5th respectively by Baseball Prospectus's EQA, which is a rate stat used to measure offense. The average EQA is .260. So only Boston was an above average offense.
He followed up that start with a nice 14 start stretch.
| GS | W | L | IP | H | HR | R | ER | SO | BB | TBF | Stk% |
| 14 | 6 | 4 | 85.0 | 94 | 8 | 38 | 36 | 61 | 18 | 354 | 65.6% |
| FB% | GB% | LD% | ERA | RA | FIP | xFIP | HR/FB | BB/9 | K/9 | RSAA | BABIP |
| 37.2% | 44.7% | 18.0% | 3.81 | 4.02 | 3.62 | 4.07 | 0.08 | 1.9 | 6.5 | 8.5 | .323 |
His K rate spiked up, his line drive percentage plummetted, his HR rate per fly ball dropped. The opponents he faced over this stretch?
Team: EQA
Angels: .262
Red Sox: .270
White Sox: .243
Diamondbacks: .248
Rockies: .264
Giants: .247
Athletics: .262
Twins: .252
Devil Rays: .266
Devil Rays: .266
Royals: .241
White Sox: .243
Royals .241
Indians: .260
That's 7 games against average or above teams and 7 games against below average teams. The reason I bring this is up is there is a theory that Moose only did well because he was facing bad teams. Let's look at the splits over this stretch.
| Vs | GS | W | L | IP | H | HR | R | ER | BB | SO | ERA | RA | FIP | FB% | GB% | LD% | |
| EQA: .260+ | 7 | 2 | 2 | 42.7 | 53 | 4 | 22 | 22 | 13 | 27 | 4.64 | 4.64 | 4.07 | 34% | 45% | 21% | |
| EGA: <.260 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 42.3 | 41 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 5 | 34 | 2.98 | 3.40 | 3.18 | 40% | 45% | 15% |
Obviously, pitchers will do worse against good teams, otherwise they wouldn't be good teams, but it does look like there is something to the idea that Mussina benefitted from some cupcakes. Whether he suffers more than most against better teams would require a more rigorous study of all pitchers, which I don't really have the inclination to do right now.
Moose's season finished off poorly.
| GS | W | L | IP | H | HR | R | ER | SO | BB | TBF | Stk% |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 38.0 | 58 | 1 | 31 | 30 | 18 | 11 | 175 | 65.2% |
| FB% | GB% | LD% | ERA | RA | FIP | xFIP | HR/FB | BB/9 | K/9 | RSAA | BABIP |
| 33.8% | 43.4% | 22.8% | 7.11 | 7.34 | 3.46 | 4.97 | 0.02 | 2.6 | 4.3 | -10.2 | .393 |
His walk rate went up, his K rate went down and he started giving up more line drives again. FIP says he had some bad luck on balls in play, but anyone that watched saw he was getting hit hard.
2008
Projecting Mussina for 2008 is a little bit dicey. Projections using past data will probably overrate him because he's lost some fastball velocity that he had in 2004-2006. Regardless, this is supposed to be objective so here's how he looks.
| Projection | G | GS | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA | FIP | RSAA | RSAR | FRSAA | FRSAR |
| chone | 29 | 28 | 163 | 185 | 89 | 82 | 19 | 42 | 109 | 4.53 | 4.15 | -1 | 15 | 4 | 18 |
| marcel | 33 | 27 | 155 | 174 | 84 | 79 | 16 | 40 | 113 | 4.59 | 3.86 | -2 | 13 | 8 | 22 |
| pecota | 25 | 25 | 150 | 164 | 82 | 76 | 18 | 40 | 101 | 4.54 | 4.21 | -1 | 14 | 2 | 15 |
| zips | 30 | 29 | 171 | 195 | 99 | 90 | 21 | 41 | 112 | 4.74 | 4.21 | -5 | 12 | 3 | 17 |
| cairo | 30 | 30 | 176 | 204 | 98 | 91 | 22 | 43 | 125 | 4.65 | 4.14 | -4 | 14 | 4 | 19 |
| average | 29 | 28 | 163 | 184 | 90 | 84 | 19 | 41 | 112 | 4.61 | 4.11 | -3 | 14 | 4 | 18 |
Moose projects to bounce back this season, although as I said a lot of his projection is based on what he has done in the past and he's not that guy anymore. The FIP and ERA disparity here makes some sense to me, because I think DIPS theory that a pitcher has minimal control over balls in play suffers from selection bias in that any pitcher who is worse than average will not last long in the majors. We saw that with Kevin Brown in his last year, as he allowed a BABIP of .381. Anyway, if Moose puts up an ERA of 4.61 he'll be a touch below average, or about a win and a half better than replacement if he can pitch 160 or so innings. Here's Moose's range of CAIRO projections.
| CAIRO % | G | GS | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | SO | ERA | FIP | RSAA | RSAR | FRSAA | FRSAR |
| 80% | 30 | 30 | 176 | 190 | 88 | 81 | 17 | 36 | 136 | 4.17 | 3.55 | 6 | 23 | 16 | 31 |
| 65% | 30 | 30 | 176 | 197 | 93 | 86 | 20 | 40 | 131 | 4.41 | 3.84 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 25 |
| Baseline | 30 | 30 | 176 | 204 | 98 | 91 | 22 | 43 | 125 | 4.65 | 4.14 | -4 | 14 | 4 | 19 |
| 35% | 30 | 30 | 176 | 211 | 103 | 96 | 24 | 46 | 119 | 4.90 | 4.43 | -8 | 9 | -2 | 13 |
| 20% | 30 | 30 | 176 | 218 | 108 | 101 | 27 | 50 | 114 | 5.14 | 4.72 | -13 | 4 | -7 | 8 |
My guess is the 35% projection is around where we'll see him in 2008, which isn't really that bad for a third or fourth starter. The innings are probably optimistic, I'd expect him to be closer to 150.
Value
If you guessed that Moose is overpaid relative to his free agent worth, you win nothing but a pat on the back.
| Proj WAR | Proj Value | Salary | Difference |
| 1.4 | $6,300,000 | $12,000,000 | -$5,700,000 |
Conclusion
This is very likely Mussina's last year as a Yankee. He's no longer needed to be an ace on the staff, just to be serviceable at the back of the rotation while hopefully mentoring the younger pitchers on the team. He looked good in his last spring training start, hitting 88 mph and showing good command. If he can keep his fastball in the 88-90 mph range instead of the 84-86 range I think he'll be fine in that role. On an unrelated note, Jeteupthemiddle is running her community projections for 2008. If you're interested in helping out, you can visit her blog.
Comments
Very sneaky of you, faking like you’re linking to her blog, but then just linking back to RLYW. I see what you’re doing.
I’m really hopefull this season isn’t Kevin Brown Farewell Tour 2.0 for Moose. I really like the guy, and honestly want him to put up at least slightly above replacement level numbers. If Hughes and Kennedy work out well, having Moose as the #5 iis nothing to sneeze at.
No sinister plot here, just bad HTML. It’s fixed.
I like Moose too and hope he does well, but it’s tough to fight a physical loss of skill.
One has to wonder though, given the fact that Mussina was hitting 88 in March during this last start, whether injuries last year were aggravating his loss of skill. Working out during the off-season may have helped as well. In any case, Mussina essentially only needs to give the Yanks a good to serviceable first half, at least in theory, as the team can then substitute Joba for him after the AS break - again, if everything goes according to plan.
As IE said, there was some talk that Moose was fighting through several minor injuries last year. Plus as noted he has finally decided that strength training is a good thing. From an objective prediction system, I agree that you can’t factor those things in; you can speculate, but what happened, happened.
Subjectively, I think Moose will do well this year. Not 2003 good certainly, and probably not even 2006 good. But I think he could get back to being a decent 3/4 type, which may also mean that this may *not* be his last season with the Yanks; there are a lot of other things that have to happen if he wants to be back, but the only one he can control is how well he pithes.
there was some talk that Moose was fighting through several minor injuries last year
Of course, that can be looked at as just another way of saying that he’s 39.
Indeed, there is some talk this spring that Moose is 39.
That said, I will root like hell for him to put up decent numbers during the regular season and contribute some good innings to a WS run. There’s always been an anti-Mussina crowd that overstates his failings, I believe, because Moose doesn’t profile the way we like our athletes to. This has made me like him more.
Also, Kay hates Mussina.
I like Mussina, too, and I’m certainly not rooting against him. But nagging injuries come with the territory at his age. I expect him to give the Yankees some effective starts when he’s feeling good, and some not so effective starts when he’s not feeling good. I just hope that Eiland and Girardi are perceptive enough, and Mussina cooperative enough, to minimize the number of times that he takes the hill when his body isn’t going to give him a chance to be competitive.
Kay hates anyone who’s smarter than he is. That’s why he’s got so much hate.
Kay hates Mussina because he has more trouble with the New York Times crossword puzzle.
Seriously, I don’t think I’ve ever been as aware of a team’s broadcaster/local radio personality hating an essential member of the team, and for years. Hates him! Like, with hatred! It’s almost as if Mussina went to Stuyvesant or something.
Perhaps Mike M. attended the Stuyvesant of Williamsport, PA.
Oh, do they have a branch there?
Are you in the market for some rustic employment, Frog?
By the way, Scott Patterson is really making a case for himself. Girardi puts him in the middle of innings with men on and he has come through again and again. He’s also shown an ability to strike out major league hitters in his small sample size. Right now, I’d rather have him on the roster than Veras or Bruney.
It also appears the Yanks have avenged Cervelli as Heath Phillips hit Evan Longoria with a pitch and was ejected in the first inning.
apparently Shelley came into 2nd base with his spikes high and started a bench clearing fiasco. Supposedly Johnny Gomes laid him out.
According to Peter Abraham, Gomes ran in from right field and “tackled” him. In any case, Duncan just became even more of an icon. This also probably guarantees a roster spot for Morgan Ensberg as Shelley will almost certainly sit out a few games to begin the season. In any case, I’m all for this sort of thing. If Tampa wants to play spring training games like the 7th game of the World Series, that’s their business. But other teams, namely the Yanks, don’t have to stand by idly while their players get knocked around in exhibition games.
By the way, what is it about Andy Sonnastine that the Yanks can’t touch the guy - even in spring training?
Kay hates Mussina, cuz this is how we rolled at Stuyvesant.
But nagging injuries come with the territory at his age.
Yes, of course. And it is a fine-line with, “he was unlucky with the injuries last year”, and “he’s just old”. I *think* he was a little unlucky with the nagging injuries last year. And even if he wasn’t he certainly *could* be lucky with them this year. And of course, if he is on a good strength/conditioning program, it could help prevent some of these injuries as well. I will be optimistic with him until proven otherwise!
I’d really like to see Moose get into the Hall, because if he doesn’t it will be due to stuff out of his control; not having enough offense/bullpen to win 20 games, etc. Certainly it is unlikely he is there (as in, has compiled the numbers) yet. Being an important part of a World Series winner would help!
Mussina is on the all-time snakebit team, for sure. Two of his best years, ‘94-5, he would have had a strong possibility of 20 wins if it weren’t for the strike. He probably deserved the 2001 CY Young Award over his teammate. Carl Everett: We won’t even go there.
At the same time, Mussina played his entire career for winning teams, with the exception of his last two years on the Orioles. Let’s not pretend he has labored in obscurity for baseball’s downtrodden. He spent a good part of his career having the best closer in baseball history backing him up, if not always the best middle men. In any case, if we give Mussina another 10 career wins to make up for 94-95 and some tough luck, that still only puts him at 260. That’s a fine career, no doubt about it, but he was never quite dominant enough to be considered in the same class as say, Randy Johnson or even Schilling. Failing that, he needs 300 wins, which is out of reach.
IE,
In the past a lot of the talk has been about Mussina missing the “magic” numbers. Things like, “he’s never won 20 games”, or, “he hasn’t ever won a Cy Young”. For the most part, HOF voters don’t dig deep. I think Moose having 260 wins PLUS 3 or 4 20 win seasons, and a Cy Young, would get him in the Hall. I’m not saying he would have had to pitch better, just have a handful more wins at the right time.
Is that right? No. But I think it would have changed the perception of a number of the voters about him, and it seems that perception is probably more important than fact with a number of voters. Schilling may be a keystone player for Moose though. If Schilling doesn’t get in, Moose probably won’t either. But if Schilling does get in, I think Moose has a punchers chance. Especially if he can get a big WS moment this year.
<a href =“http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/yankees/ny-spbrawl0313,0,4256678.story”>Tag</a>
Wow, Shelley looks really big next to Iwamura. I wouldn’t mind having him behind me at any point.
Darn it, hit submit instead of preview and screwed up the tag. Oh well. I just hope this doesn’t spill over and start anything actually bad. Can you imagine if Posada had gotten his wrist broken instead of Cervilli? Posada probably would have gotten out of the way, but I still shudder at the thought.
I really believe that Mussina will have a bounce back year in 2008.
I’m feeling extremely lazy at the moment, but there is a list of something like 8 players who had an ERA under 4 after the age of 35, and then had an ERA over 5 the following year.
In the third year, the players bounced back tremendously.
I truly think that he will give the team at least his 65% CAIRO line.
Oh, and thanks for the linkage.
Good point, I remember writing about the bounce back effect with Randy Johnson last offseason.
Ok, feeling less lazy and went back to where I posted the information. pretty table
It has happened 11 times since 1950 (including to Jaimie Moyer twice).
Year 1 average: 212.4 IP 3.46 ERA
Year 2 average: 169.7 IP 5.60 ERA
Year 3 average: 184.1 IP 4.09 ERA….with every single pitcher dropping in ERA and 7 of them increasing their IP total (or stayed within 2 innings).
I think there is a lot of encouragement there.
including to Jaimie Moyer twice
so far
Next entry: YES: Tempers flare in Yanks-Rays matchup
Previous entry: Looking Ahead to 2008 - Andy Pettitte
There are currently 62 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.
Logged in users: PredX











