The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Looking Ahead to 2007: Mike Mussina

DATE: 3/18/2007 04:42:00 PM
Mike Mussina put up two of the worst seasons of his career in 2004 and 2005.  Entering the final guaranteed year of his contract at age 37, a rebound seemed to be less likely than a continued descent.  However, a spring training discovery by Jorge Posada that Mussina’s grip was tipping his changeup was credited with Mussina rebounding last season.  I think improved health was also a factor.

The table below shows the pitch results for all of major league baseball in 2006, as well as Mussina’s 2004-2005 seasons, and 2006, expressed as a percentage of all pitches thrown.

The only real change between 2004-2005 and 2006 was that Mussina threw fewer pitches that were called for balls, and more called strikes.  Hitters put the same percentage of balls in play, and swung and missed at the same percentage of pitches.  If the changeup was more deceptive, it wasn’t causing hitters to swing and miss any more often.  This tells me Moose’s health was probably the main factor in his 2006 resurgence.

Mussina’s ERA went up as the season progressed.  From the start of the season through May 31, Mussina had an ERA of 2.42.  From June 1 on, it was 4.28.  However, his FIP (fielding independent pitching) was fairly consistent throughout the season.  FIP is a quick and east way to remove the factors that are at least partially outside of a pitcher’s control when assessing their performance, by focusing on the components that they have direct control over, namely HRs, BB + HBP, and Ks.  It’s calculated using the following formula:

(13 x HR + 3 x (HBP + BB) - 2 x K ) / IP + 3.2

The final result is a # that should scale fairly closely to ERA.  If a pitcher’s ERA doesn’t line up with their FIP, you should expect them to move closer together the more they pitch.  This is illustrated very clearly if you look at Mussina’s 2006.

 

So, he was probably a little bit fortunate in the first half of the season, and a little unfortunate in the second half, but he basically pitched fairly consistently well all season.  In 2006 among ERA qualifiers, Mussina’s FIP was fifth in the league, behind Santana, Bonderman, Sabathia, and Lackey.  He was also able to go a little deeper into games this season compared to last year, but he’s still not much more than a six inning pitcher most of the time.  Here’s how Mussina’s performance in 2006 breaks down by inning.

 

Calculating ERA from the play by play data is a little tricky due to inherited runners and partial innings, so instead I’m using CERA here (component ERA).  This is calculated using the formula 31 x OBP x SLG.  As you can see, the sixth inning is by far Mussina’s worst (with a significant sample size), yet for some reason Joe Torre is often asleep at the switch when the implosion comes.  It would behoove the Yankees to have someone at least loosening in the pen when the sixth inning starts in a Mussina game.  With a fifty man bullpen that shouldn’t be an issue.

Mussina projects to be worse in 2007, which is understandable given his 2004 and 2005 seasons.

 

RSAA is runs saved above average.

Anyone who can’t see the charts above should be able to view them via this link.

He’s still projected to be around a win above average, or three wins above a replacement pitcher.  If he is healthy, I’d expect him to better those projections, but health is a legitimate concern, and he hasn’t looked particularly good in spring training so far, although he pitched pretty well today.This season will be a pivotal one for Mussina’s fading Hall of Fame chances.  He lacks a lot of the baubles that a typical HOFer has, but if he can get a World Series title and/or a 20 win season, it’ll help his chances a lot.

--Posted at 4:42 pm by SG / No Comments | No Trackbacks - (162)

Comments

Hey, check it out -- nobody's commented yet! You could be the first to comment on this AWESOME post! Hurry up and think of something to say! And not "First!", or anything like that, because that would be lame, and you'd be lame for doing it. Especially if someone beats you to it.

Well, since you spent so much time reading this, you've probably missed your shot to be first, but go ahead and post anyway. Someone might read it. Not ME, but someone.

1 of 963 registered readers are currently logged in.
There are currently 61 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.

Logged in users: PredX


Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*