The Curse of Jerry Hairston, Jr./Eric Hinske:
 

Sunday, July 5, 2009

AL Team Pitching Stats Through Games of July 4, 2009

Apologies for the lack of posts this week, but I've crawled out of the basement to enjoy the July Fourth week and haven't been around a computer much. I have caught at least parts of most of the games this week at either bars or at friend's houses, with the occasional torturous John Sterling listen thrown in, so I have been able to enjoy the Yankees winning nine of their last 10 games at least.

Anyway, I was enjoying the Yankees' recent stretch of pitching (93 IP, 77 H, 9 HR, 30 BB, 81 K, 3.00 ERA over their last 10 games) and wanted to see how they rank in the AL after their crappy April. So I pulled the splits for every team for April, then May through July 4, using David Pinto's Day by Day Database.

The only problem with this database is it pulls the data in terms of how batters have done against the pitchers, so we have to finagle it a little if we want to look at in terms of our standard pitching stats.

Basically, I just have to convert outs recorded (PA - H - HBP - BB + GDP) to innings pitched. The splits don't include pickoffs, caught stealings, or outs on the bases, although those shouldn't make a big difference in the overall numbers, and probably shouldn't necessarily be credited to the pitchers anyway. I'm using the batting events to calculate context-neutral batting runs against using linear weights instead of looking at actual runs allowed.

I'll also include the FIP data to account for defense and/or random fluctuations that may not be captured in the actual batting events. I haven't park-adjusted these numbers, which for the Yankees means their HRs will probably show as too high which will impact their FIP, so keep that in mind. Their runs allowed will also look high depending on what the NYS Park Factor is. Last time I looked at it it was 1.06, but I haven't looked at in a while. If you want to adjust for that, multiply their BR allowed by 0.97.

So here's how the teams performed in April, sorted by runs saved above replacement (RSAR) looking at BR(batting runs) per nine, which will usually scale somewhere between team RA and ERA.
Team BF Outs IP H BR HR BB HBP K BR/9 FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR K/BF BB/BF
SEA 830 589 196.3 179 78 13 69 8 148 3.56 3.73 30.2 51.7 21.2 41.7 0.178 0.083
KCA 806 578 192.7 172 77 16 74 5 172 3.62 3.72 28.4 49.6 20.9 41.0 0.213 0.092
OAK 765 531 177.0 163 81 18 88 2 128 4.12 4.60 16.3 35.7 1.9 20.4 0.167 0.115
TBA 856 595 198.3 189 99 23 87 6 147 4.47 4.63 10.4 32.2 1.5 22.2 0.172 0.102
TOR 928 648 216.0 202 111 27 88 9 177 4.61 4.53 8.0 31.8 4.0 26.5 0.191 0.095
DET 791 548 182.7 185 95 26 72 3 137 4.68 4.78 5.5 25.5 -1.7 17.4 0.173 0.091
BOS 884 593 197.7 200 108 22 93 13 162 4.91 4.62 0.9 22.6 1.8 22.5 0.183 0.105
CHA 839 558 186.0 205 102 16 81 3 135 4.93 4.22 0.3 20.7 9.9 29.3 0.161 0.097
MIN 838 571 190.3 213 107 26 62 5 132 5.06 4.64 -2.4 18.5 1.2 21.0 0.158 0.074
LAA 819 549 183.0 217 103 20 70 4 114 5.05 4.59 -2.1 18.0 2.3 21.4 0.139 0.085
NYA 871 580 193.3 206 120 28 86 16 156 5.58 5.05 -13.7 7.5 -7.6 12.6 0.179 0.099
CLE 873 579 193.0 217 128 30 94 10 142 5.95 5.37 -21.6 -0.4 -14.3 5.9 0.163 0.108
TEX 853 559 186.3 215 124 33 84 11 114 5.97 5.81 -21.3 -0.8 -23.0 -3.5 0.134 0.098
BAL 890 580 193.3 243 145 40 70 8 151 6.75 5.54 -38.8 -17.6 -18.0 2.2 0.170 0.079
LgAvg 11843 8058 2686.0 2806 1476 338 1118 103 2015 4.94 4.70 0.0 21.1 0.0 20.0 0.170 0.094


BR/9: Batting runs allowed per nine innings using linear weights
FIP: Fielding Independent Pitching, a measure of all those things for which a pitcher is specifically responsible. The formula is (HR*13+(BB+HBP-IBB)*3-K*2)/IP, plus a league-specific factor (usually around 3.2) to round out the number to an equivalent ERA number.
RSAA: Runs saved above average using BR/9 subtracted from league average BR/9 divided by nine times innings pitched.
RSAR: Runs saved above replacement using BR/9 but subtracted from a replacement level instead of average (1.2 times league average)
FRSAA: RSAA calculated using FIP instead of BR/9
FRSAR: RSAR calculated using FIP instead of BR/9
K/BF: Strikeouts per batters faced
BB/BF: Walks per batters faced

The Yankees were less than a win better than replacement level in April, ranking 14th in the AL in RSAR, ahead of only Cleveland, Texas, and Baltimore. While the longball didn't help things, several teams were worse in that department. FIP felt they pitched a bit better than BR/9, but not that much better.

Since May 1, here's how the teams have performed.

Team BF Outs IP H BR HR BB HBP K BR/9 FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR K/BF BB/BF
CHA 2195 1569 523.0 482 234 63 176 16 425 4.02 4.24 30.1 82.8 11.9 63.6 0.194 0.080
SEA 2201 1535 511.7 494 247 63 202 14 379 4.34 4.59 11.2 62.8 -7.9 42.7 0.172 0.092
MIN 2223 1571 523.7 519 257 68 158 24 383 4.41 4.47 7.2 60.0 -1.2 50.6 0.172 0.071
TEX 2166 1518 506.0 497 248 58 181 25 326 4.40 4.62 7.6 58.6 -9.9 40.1 0.151 0.084
BOS 2181 1508 502.7 510 246 49 166 28 432 4.40 3.91 7.9 58.6 30.2 79.9 0.198 0.076
NYA 2182 1515 505.0 469 248 72 205 26 450 4.42 4.64 6.4 57.3 -11.0 38.9 0.206 0.094
TBA 2194 1534 511.3 499 253 64 185 15 401 4.45 4.43 5.2 56.7 0.9 51.4 0.183 0.084
OAK 2276 1583 527.7 557 267 58 175 9 402 4.56 4.15 -1.1 52.2 17.4 69.5 0.177 0.077
LgAvg 30939 21495 7165.0 7193 3613 856 2632 267 5444 4.54 4.45 0.0 40.9 0.0 38.4 0.176 0.085
DET 2212 1530 510.0 500 258 57 227 12 405 4.55 4.47 -0.6 50.8 -1.3 49.1 0.183 0.103
KCA 2184 1506 502.0 523 254 52 183 17 366 4.56 4.28 -1.2 49.4 9.1 58.7 0.168 0.084
TOR 2163 1507 502.3 512 258 64 172 19 399 4.63 4.41 -5.0 45.7 2.2 51.8 0.184 0.080
BAL 2231 1539 513.0 542 277 61 183 23 322 4.85 4.70 -18.0 33.7 -14.1 36.6 0.144 0.082
LAA 2203 1506 502.0 517 270 64 195 28 389 4.84 4.64 -17.0 33.6 -10.8 38.9 0.177 0.089
CLE 2328 1574 524.7 572 297 63 224 11 365 5.10 4.71 -32.5 20.4 -15.5 36.3 0.157 0.096


The Yankees have been markedly better since April, moving up to fifth best in terms of runs saved above replacement. Their BR/9 has been better than their FIP, which could mean any or all of the following:
1) Their defense is playing better than average
2) The pitchers are allowing more easily fieldable balls in play (fewer line drives, more fly balls)
3) Random fluctuation of how balls in play have been distributed
4) Other stuff I'm probably not thinking of

We also see the Yankees have the best strikeout rate in the AL since April (they struck out 20.6% of the batters they faced compared to a league average of 17.6%). The BB rate isn't great at 9.4%, although Cleveland (9.6%) and Detroit (10.3%) have been worse.

Lastly, here's how the teams look for the entire season.

Team BF Outs IP H BR HR BB HBP K BR/9 FIP RSAA RSAR FRSAA FRSAR K/BF BB/BF
SEA 3031 2124 708 673 325 76 271 22 527 4.13 4.35 41.3 114.5 13.3 84.4 0.174 0.089
CHA 3034 2127 709 687 336 79 257 19 560 4.26 4.24 30.4 103.6 21.8 92.9 0.185 0.085
KCA 2990 2084 694.7 695 332 68 257 22 538 4.30 4.13 27.2 99.0 30.0 99.7 0.180 0.086
TBA 3050 2129 709.7 688 351 87 272 21 548 4.45 4.49 15.5 88.9 2.3 73.6 0.180 0.089
OAK 3041 2114 704.7 720 348 76 263 11 530 4.45 4.26 15.2 87.9 19.3 89.9 0.174 0.086
BOS 3065 2101 700.3 710 353 71 259 41 594 4.54 4.11 8.8 81.2 32.0 102.4 0.194 0.085
MIN 3061 2142 714 732 364 94 220 29 515 4.59 4.52 4.8 78.5 -0.1 71.6 0.168 0.072
TOR 3091 2155 718.3 714 369 91 260 28 576 4.62 4.45 3.0 77.4 6.2 78.4 0.186 0.084
DET 3003 2078 692.7 685 353 83 299 15 542 4.58 4.55 4.8 76.3 -3.0 66.5 0.180 0.100
NYA 3053 2095 698.3 675 368 100 291 42 606 4.75 4.76 -7.3 64.9 -18.6 51.5 0.198 0.095
TEX 3019 2077 692.3 712 371 91 265 36 440 4.83 4.94 -13.7 57.8 -32.8 36.6 0.146 0.088
LAA 3022 2055 685 734 373 84 265 32 503 4.90 4.63 -19.1 51.6 -8.5 60.2 0.166 0.088
CLE 3201 2153 717.7 789 425 93 318 21 507 5.33 4.89 -54.1 20.0 -29.8 42.2 0.158 0.099
BAL 3121 2119 706.3 785 422 101 253 31 473 5.37 4.93 -56.8 16.2 -32.1 38.7 0.152 0.081
LgAvg 42782 29553 9851 9999 5089 1194 3750 370 7459 4.65 4.52 0.0 72.7 0.0 70.6 0.174 0.088


Looking at the season at a whole, the Yankees are still below average overall (10th in RSAR), although trending upward. If we adjust their numbers for a 1.06 park factor we only get about a five run difference in their BR/9, so they would still rank ninth in terms of RSAR. The K rate is encouraging, but I'd like to see the BB rate come down a little.

Looking at the teams ahead of the Yankees, none are really outpitching their FIP, so if the Yankees are going to move up this list they'll probably need to do it on their own. I think I could see them creeping towards average, which would necessitate passing Detroit and Toronto. Given their ballpark that would be pretty good.

In roster news, Wang goes to the DL, with Albaladejo being called up. I don't think this means Hughes gets Wang's next start, I think it just means they wanted a bullpen arm for the next four days while they decide who gets the start in Wang's stead.
--Posted at 9:42 am by SG / 9 Comments | - (138)

Comments

Page 1 of 1 pages:

Agreed, SG, I think Alby is just here for a few days then he’ll be sent down for Mitre (no matter who starts Thursday, I think Mitre gets called up - as a starter or as a long man if need be).

I know King Felix has been amazing, but I’m shocked Seattle’s pitching as a whole has been that good.

I know King Felix has been amazing, but I’m shocked Seattle’s pitching as a whole has been that good.

Safeco as a pitcher’s park is a big part of that.  On paper, the Mariners projected to have a very good defensive team in 2009 as well.  UZR has them third in baseball at +26.8 although ZR has them as below average.  So the pitching staff is likely being helped a non-trivial amount by the D if you believe UZR over ZR.  Losing Beltre and Endy Chavez hurts that going forward, although picking up Langerhans should help the OF D.

Hopefully they can pitch very well for one more game today.

Just checking - the statistical uncertainty on 450 is about 21 or 5%, and 0.05*20.6 is about 1 so 20.6 is separated from 17.6.  The BB uncertainty is like 14/200 = 0.07 so 0.09*0.07 = 0.006 so 9+-0.6, so maybe that’s something to work with in arguing poor luck.

I think they’ll wait until after Wednesday’s game to decide on Thursday’s starter.  If the bullpen is rested, Aceves will start and they’ll hope that he can get through five innings on 60 or so pitches.  After that game, they won’t need a fifth starter again until July 21st, and you really don’t want to make a 40-man roster move just to cover yourself for one game if you can help it.  While it’s true that they don’t have to DFA someone if they move Nady to the 60-day DL, it’s also true that Mitre is out of options, and they won’t be able to send him back down if and when Wang (or Marte for that matter) comes back.

“Mitre is out of options”

There’s a serious need for a correct database of this info, without which one can’t understand what the heck the FO is doing half the time.

Yeah, it does suck that we have to piece the options info together for ourselves, and I still cannot for the life of me figure out how Kevin Cash had an option left.  But with Mitre it seems straigthforward enough from his BB-Ref page.  He made his MLB debut on July 22, 2003, and didn’t appear in another MLB game until September.  So he must have been on the Cubs 40-man at that point, and it seems pretty unlikely that he could have pitched all of his 145 innings (and made 24 starts) in AA before that emergency start.  The number of AAA innings he pitched in 2004 and 2005 certainly make it look like he burned options in those two years as well.  His minor league time in 2006 and 2007 looks like rehab.

Do we really care if we lose Mitre?  If he isn’t going to be used now he will never be used.

Who says you’re going to lose Mitre?  If Mitre has a couple of decent starts, then rather than just cutting him loose, they’re liable to DFA someone better who might be more useful down the road.  And then you wouldn’t just losing that guy from the 40-man, you’d be keeping Mitre on the active roster beyond the time when he was needed.  Didn’t we just spend the last couple of months pissing a moaning about exactly this kind of roster mismanagement?

Page 1 of 1 pages:
0 of 963 registered readers are currently logged in.
There are currently 76 visitors who are not logged in.
There was a record 241 simultaneous visitors on May 2, 2011 at 11:54:25 pm.

Does Robinson Cano’s Approach Change With Men on Base?
(50 Comments - 1/26/2010 10:44:25 am)

2010 CAIRO Projections v0.2
(14 Comments - 1/25/2010 10:56:33 pm)

One Of The Following Stories May or May Not Be True
(26 Comments - 1/25/2010 1:51:23 pm)

What Happened to Wang?
(13 Comments - 1/24/2010 11:53:14 pm)

NY Times - Glanville: Seeing is Disbelieving
(62 Comments - 1/24/2010 9:27:27 pm)

RealGM Baseball: Yankees Among Teams Interested In Edmonds
(3 Comments - 1/23/2010 4:52:40 pm)

Should Jesus Montero Be an Option for Left Field?
(65 Comments - 1/22/2010 10:24:20 am)

CAIRO Projected 2010 AL East Standings as of January 16
(35 Comments - 1/21/2010 2:53:01 pm)

MLB.com - Bauman: Yankees appear stronger
(18 Comments - 1/21/2010 5:21:26 am)

TSBG Versus High and Low Fastballs
(5 Comments - 1/20/2010 9:00:27 am)



*ADVERTISEMENT*
Our new URL is: http://www.rlyw.net
*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

image
Way back in the 20th century, Bill James wrote the first essential book about baseball managers. Chris Jaffe has just written the second.
- Rob Neyer, ESPN.com

From now on, whenever I have a question about a manager, Jaffe's book will be the first and last one I reach for.
- Sean Forman, Baseball-Reference.com


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*
John Brattain Memorial Fund

The Hardball Times has set up a memorial fund for John Brattain's family. He left behind a wife and two teenage daughters.

Four years ago, I found from personal experience how generous the online community can be to its own in their hour of need. I am now literally begging you to be even more generous than you were to me.


*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*

*ADVERTISEMENT*